Open Access

Predictive factors for time to recurrence, treatment and post-recurrence survival in patients with initially resected colorectal liver metastases

  • Jon-Helge Angelsen1, 2Email author,
  • Asgaut Viste1, 2,
  • Inger Marie Løes3, 6,
  • Geir Egil Eide4, 5,
  • Dag Hoem1,
  • Halfdan Sorbye3, 6 and
  • Arild Horn1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201513:328

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0738-8

Received: 7 March 2015

Accepted: 23 November 2015

Published: 3 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Despite progress in resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the majority of patients experience recurrence. We aimed to evaluate factors influencing time to recurrence (TTR), treatment and post-recurrence survival (PRS) related to site of recurrence.

Methods

This is a retrospective population-based cohort study (1998–2012) of consecutive patients without extrahepatic disease treated with resection for CLM in a referral centre.

Results

A total of 311 patients underwent resection for CLM. After a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 1.2–15.2), 209 (67.4 %) patients developed recurrence, hepatic 90, extrahepatic 59 and both 60. Median TTR was 14.0 months, and 5-year recurrence-free status was 25.7 %. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) was 38.8 and 22.0 %, respectively. Median OS was 45 months. A multivariate analysis displayed synchronous disease (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (HR 1.40), increasing number (HR 1.24) and size of metastases (HR 1.08) to shorten TTR (all p < 0.05). Perioperative chemotherapy (n = 59) increased overall TTR (HR 0.63) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.55). Hepatic TTR was correlated to synchronous disease (HR 2.07), number of lesions (HR 1.20), R1 resection (HR 2.00) and ASA score (HR 1.69), whereas extrahepatic TTR was correlated to N stage of the primary (HR 1.79), number (HR 1.27) and size of metastases (HR 1.16). Single-site recurrence was most common (135 of 209, 64.5 %), while 58 patients had double- and 16 triple-site relapses. Median PRS was 24.3 months. There was a difference in median PRS (months) according to site of relapse: liver 30.5, lung 32.3, abdominal 22.0, liver and lung 14.3, others 14.8 (p = 0.002). Repeated liver resections were performed in n = 57 patients resulting in 40.6 months median OS and 36.8 % 5-year OS.

Conclusions

An adverse overall TTR was correlated to number and size of metastases, ASA score and synchronous disease. Perioperative chemotherapy increased TTR and OS after surgery for CLM. Patients with solitary post-resection relapse in the liver or lungs had the potential for longevity due to multimodal treatment.

Keywords

Resection colorectal liver metastases Overall survival Time to recurrence Sites of recurrence Perioperative chemotherapy Post-recurrence survival

Background

Surgical intervention (resection or local ablation) is the only potentially curative option for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Due to progress in surgical technique and perioperative care during the last two decades, perioperative morbidity (17–38 %) and mortality (1–2 %) have declined [13]. Furthermore, by multimodal treatment like chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and portal vein embolization, some patients have achieved downsizing of initially unresectable CLM and might be offered a potentially curative resection [4]. Perioperative chemotherapy has also improved progression-free survival [5] and overall survival (OS) in the adjuvant setting [6]. Following these advancements, OS has increased to 47–58 % in several series [3, 7, 8]. Despite this, the recurrence rates (57–77 %) and disease-free survival have remained almost unchanged in the same period [7, 911]. Due to improved surgical approach, repeated resections are more often offered to selected patients with recurrent disease [12, 13]. For patients beyond the range of cure, optimal oncological therapy may yield life extension [14, 15].

A large number of reports have evaluated survival after resection, whereas rather few studies have highlighted the fate of patients with recurrence according to site of relapse.

In this paper, we aimed to analyse the (1) sites of recurrence after liver resections for CLM, (2) factors influencing time to recurrence (TTR) in different sites and (3) treatment of post-resection recurrence and the impact on survival according to site of relapse.

Methods

This is a population-based retrospective cohort study with a consecutive series of patients with CLM treated at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway (1998–2012). The data were retrospectively recorded from 1998 to 2008 and prospectively from 2009 to 2012. The unit is the only hepato-pancreato-biliary centre in the region, which makes this a population-based cohort from this catchment area of 0.7 million people. Clinical data were retrieved from the patients’ medical records. All patients were prospectively followed up until 15 March 2014. Recorded variables were TNM stage and site of primary tumour, synchronous metastases (detected within 3 months after resection of the primary colorectal tumour [16, 17]), time between resection of primary tumour and diagnosis of liver metastases (disease-free interval), number and size of metastases, chemotherapy (indication, number of cycles and response), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, date of liver resection, resection margins (R1 <1 mm [8]), complications (Clavien-Dindo classification [18]), in-hospital mortality, time to recurrence, sites of recurrence and death (perioperative, cancer-related and other causes) and last date of follow-up for survivors.

Preoperative assessments

The selection criteria for surgery were a sufficient tumour-free liver remnant (>30 %) and absence of (a) disseminated disease as evaluated preoperatively and/or (b) non-resectable extrahepatic metastases. Patients with preoperatively detected resectable extrahepatic disease and macroscopically incomplete resection (R2) were excluded from further analyses (Fig. 1). Preoperative investigations included computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen/pelvis and tumour marker analysis (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)). In cases with an inconclusive CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or 18fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan were performed. Each patient was finally discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting.
Fig. 1

Selection of patients. Incomplete tumour eradication: liver, n = 3 (i.e. failure of completing two-stage resection); primary rectal tumour not resected due to progression after liver first procedure, n = 3; minor liver resection performed despite finding of peritoneal carcinomatosis, n = 1

Chemotherapy

Perioperative chemotherapy was given in 59 cases. Forty-six patients were initially considered unresectable and underwent downsizing chemotherapy. Seven patients developed CLM while on adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for stage III colon cancer. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour (RECIST) version 1.1 was applied to evaluate the efficiency of chemotherapy [19]. The size of the metastases was measured on CT scan by dedicated radiologists. All patients in the perioperative group received treatment with FOLFOX regimen (fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) with intended six cycles before and after surgery. The indications for perioperative chemotherapy have changed during the study period. A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) multicentre study 40983 in the period 2001–2004 [5]. Later on, perioperative chemotherapy given as Nordic FLOX [20] were offered to patients <76 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 and no previous treatment with oxaliplatin. In the downsizing group, patients were treated with a variety of chemotherapy regimens. First-line treatment with Nordic FLOX or Nordic FLIRI regimen was most commonly used [15, 20] optionally in combination with endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (if KRAS wild type) or angiogenesis inhibitors.

Surgical procedures

Surgical techniques included intraoperative ultrasonography, repeated inflow control (Pringle manoeuvre) and transection using Ultracision, Kelly clamp, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) or Ultrasonic Aspirator (Olympus Sonosurg™). Throughout the period, we have intended to obtain a parenchyma sparing approach with wedge resections whenever possible. Formal resections (hemihepatectomies or lobectomies) were reserved for metastases abutting the portal triad or the hepatic veins. To increase intended complete tumour eradication, intraoperative RFA (StarBurst®) and portal vein ligations/embolization with two-stage resections were performed. Simultaneous colorectal cancer surgery was reserved for healthy patients with colon cancer and less advanced CLM. Further details are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics

Variable, statistics

Estimate

Age in years, median (range)

66.1 (22.8, 91.3)

Gender males/females—ratio

169/142

Location primary tumour

 Colon, n (%)

205 (65.9)

 Rectum, n (%)

101 (32.5)

 Combined, n (%)

5 (1.6)

Synchronous metastasesa, n (%)

157 (50.5)

Disease-free intervalb in months, median (range)

4.2 (−11, 131)

Resections, n

311

 Hemihepatectomy/lobectomy, n (%)

137 (44.1)

 Wedge/segment resections, n (%)

174 (55.9)

 Simultaneous radio frequency ablation, n (%)

12 (3.9)

 Two-stage resections with PVL, n (%)

3 (1.0)

 Simultaneous colorectal cancer surgery, n (%)

18 (5.8)

R1 resections (<1 mm)

63 (20.3)

Extent of RM in millimeter, median (range)

4 (0–50)

Number of metastases, median (range)

2 (1, 12)

Metastases diameter in centimeter, median (range)

3.0 (0.2, 15.0)

Bilobar metastases, n (%)

108 (34.7)

Number of procedures/patient (1/2/3/4/5)

254/42/11/3/1

Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score 1/2/3/4/5)

19/28/52/5/6

Outcome of chemotherapy (RECIST criteria)

 Partial response, n (%)

63 (56.2)

 Stable disease, n (%)

42 (37.5)

 Progression, n (%)

5 (4.4)

 Unknown, n (%)

2 (1.8)

Unknown Clavien-Dindo score n = 1

RM resection margin, RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour version 1.1

aSynchronous metastases: detection of liver metastases within 3 months after primary colorectal resection

bDisease-free interval: time between resection of the primary colorectal tumour and detection of CLM

Surveillance

Follow-up after surgery included CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis every 3 months for the first 2 years, and thereafter every 6 months for the next 3 years. After completing the 5-year follow-up, survival data were retrieved from the medical record and the Norwegian National Registry. Patients that died from other causes were also included in the analysis of OS but were censored in the estimation of TTR according to the definition stated by Punt et al. [21].

Statistical analysis

Variables with possible impact on TTR and OS like size and number of metastases, resection margins, synchronous disease and TNM stage of primary tumour were analysed with univariate and multivariate survival methods [22]. The exact chi-square (χ 2) test was used for categorical variables, the t test and the one-way analysis of variance for normally distributed variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Univariate analyses of TTR and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method [23] and tested for significance with the log-rank test [24]. Multivariate analyses of risks for overall, hepatic and extrahepatic TTR were performed as Cox proportional hazards regression reporting hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) [25] A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant. OS was defined as time to death irrespective of cause, and TTR was defined as the interval between resection and the detection of relapse [21]. The analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and Stata 13 statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). We decided to use TTR rather than disease-free survival as an outcome in assessing recurrence patterns, since the latter has treatment-related and non-cancer-related deaths as endpoints [21].

Ethics

The regional committee for medical and health research ethics, western Norway approved the study, with an exemption to the requirement for obtaining informed consent from patients included in the retrospective part (1998 to 2008). In the prospective part (2009 to 2012), patients were enrolled through written consent.

Results

A total of 342 patients were resected for CLM of whom 311 were eligible for further analysis. Patient selection and characteristics are outlined in Fig. 1 and Table 1, respectively.

Patterns and sites of recurrence

After a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 1.2–15.2) 209 patients (67.4 %) developed recurrence. The sites of recurrence were distributed between hepatic (n = 90), extrahepatic (n = 59) and both locations (n = 60). Further details are outlined in Fig. 2. Median TTR was 14.0 months, and 5-year recurrence-free status was 25.7 %. Single-site relapse was most common (135 of 209, 64.5 %), while 58 patients had double- and 16 triple-site relapses. TTR was associated with number and size of metastases, synchronous disease, increasing ASA score and perioperative chemotherapy in the multivariate analysis (Tables 2 and 3). Hepatic TTR correlated with synchronous CLM, ASA score, R1 resections and number of metastases. Extrahepatic TTR (including hepatic/extrahepatic) corresponded with node positive of the primary, number and size of metastases. Positive margins and synchronous disease were insignificant. The sites of recurrence were independent on the primary tumour location (colon vs. rectum) both in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Fig. 2

Patterns of recurrence in the three most common sites in n = 209 patients. Note: Other sites and combinations of recurrence: cerebral only, n = 1; liver/bones, n = 2; liver/cerebral, n = 1; lungs/cerebral, n = 2; liver/lungs/cerebral, n = 1; liver/abdominal/bones, n = 2; liver/lungs/bones, n = 4; liver/ovary n = 1. Recurrence was not detected in n = 101 patients with a median observation time of 4.2 years. Definitions: Abdominal locoregional recurrence involving peritoneal, lymph node and local recurrence

Table 2

Cox regression analysis of factors affecting time to overall recurrence

  

Overall recurrence (TTR)

 
  

Univariate

Multivariate

Variable

n

HR

95 % CI

p

HR

95 % CI

p

Age/10 years

311

1.11

(0.98, 1.26)

0.113

1.08

(0.94, 1.25)

0.253

Synch. mets

 No

154

1.00

Reference

0.002

1.00

Reference

0.010

 Yes

157

1.65

(1.25, 2.17)

 

1.50

(1.10, 2.04)

 

No. of mets

311

1.21

(1.14, 1.30)

<0.001

1.24

(1.14, 1.34)

<0.001

Mets diam (cm)

311

1.11

(1.04, 1.18)

0.002

1.08

(1.01, 1.16)

0.022

RM status

 R0

246

1.00

Reference

0.013

1.00

Reference

0.143

 R1

63

1.53

(1.11, 2.11)

 

1.30

(0.92, 1.84)

 

ASA score (1–3)

311

1.28

(1.00, 1.65)

0.054

1.40

(1.05, 1.87)

0.022

Clavien-Dindo

311

1.12

(1.01, 1.25)

0.037

1.07

(0.95, 1.20)

0.267

N-posa

 No

190

1.00

Reference

0.058

1.00

Reference

0.091

 Yes

109

1.32

(0.99, 1.78)

 

1.30

(0.96, 1.77)

 

Chemotherapy

 None

199

1.00

Reference

0.010

1.00

Reference

0.014

 Periop.

59

0.71

(0.49, 1.05)

 

0.63

(0.42, 0.95)

 

 Downsiz.

46

1.31

(0.90, 1.89)

 

0.93

(0.62, 1.39)

 

 Adj. colonb

7

2.98

(1.31, 6.79)

 

2.80

(1.21, 6.48)

 

Unknown N status n = 12. Unknown RM n = 2

RM resection margins, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

aN-pos: positive lymph nodes of the primary tumour in colon or rectum

bAdj. colon: adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for stage III (node positive) colon cancer

Table 3

Cox regression analysis of factors affecting time to hepatic and extrahepatic recurrence

 

Hepatic recurrence

Extrahepatic recurrencea

 

Multivariate

Variable

HR

95 % CI

p

HR

95 % CI

p

Age/10 years

1.00

(0.81, 1.24)

0.995

1.14

(0.95, 1.37)

0.165

Synch. mets

 No

1.00

Reference

0.002

1.00

Reference

0.499

 Yes

2.07

(1.28, 3.33)

 

1.15

(0.77, 1.73)

 

No. of mets

1.20

(1.07, 1.35)

0.005

1.27

(1.14, 1.41)

<0.001

Mets diam (cm)

0.99

(0.88, 1.10)

0.828

1.16

(1.07, 1.27)

0.001

RM status

 R0

1.00

Reference

0.010

1.00

Reference

0.769

 R1

2.00

(1.20, 3.31)

 

0.93

(0.57, 1.52)

 

ASA score

 (1–3)

1.69

(1.08, 2.64)

0.021

1.24

(0.85, 1.81)

0.264

 Clavien-Dindo

0.99

(0.83, 1.19)

0.958

1.12

(0.96, 1.30)

0.165

N-pos

 No

1.00

Reference

0.652

1.00

Reference

0.007

 Yes

0.90

(0.58, 1.41)

 

1.79

(1.16, 2.76)

 

Chemotherapy

 None

1.00

Reference

0.143

1.00

Reference

0.036

 Periop.

0.63

(0.34, 1.18)

 

0.64

(0.37, 1.11)

 

 Downsiz.

1.36

(0.78, 2.39)

 

0.63

(0.35, 1.14)

 

 Adj. colon

2.28

(0.54, 9.60)

 

3.12

(1.10, 8.84)

 

Unknown N status n = 12. Unknown RM n = 2

RM resection margins, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

aExtrahepatic recurrence also included combined hepatic and extrahepatic recurrence

Chemotherapy

The clinical characteristics of patients undergoing downsizing or perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone are described in Table 4. Forty-five patients completing perioperative chemotherapy experienced a longer median TTR (19.1 months) compared with patients who aborted this treatment (n = 14, 10.8 months), downsizing chemotherapy (n = 46, 10.4 months), surgery alone (n = 199, 14.4 months) or adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary (n = 7, 4.6 months), p = 0.005. Five-year recurrence-free status for these groups was 43.2, 30.8, 19.5, 23.7 % and none, respectively, (p = 0.005, Fig. 3). TTR was different between patients with response, stable disease and progression, with a 5-year recurrence-free status of 35.3, 26.0 % and none, respectively (p = 0.021). Positive margins influenced TTR in responders to chemotherapy where 3-year recurrence-free status in R0 and R1 was 47.8 and 7.1 % and median TTR was 2.0 and 0.4 years, respectively (p < 0001). This difference was not evident in patients with stable disease. For this group, 3-year recurrence-free status was 30.4 % in R0 whereas all patients with R1 had recurrence within 3 years. Median TTR was 1.1 and 1.5 years, respectively (p = 0.756). Perioperative chemotherapy correlated to an increased overall TTR in the multivariate analysis (Tables 2 and 3). Five- and 10-year OS with perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone was 57.0 and 31.6 % vs. 37.1 and 20.0 %, respectively (p = 0.024). Median OS in the same groups was 73 and 43 months, respectively. This finding was also confirmed in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.55 [0.34, 0.89], p = 0.014). Patients completing perioperative regimen had an improved 5- and 10-year OS of 62.0 and 51.6 %, respectively.
Table 4

Clinical characteristics in n = 304 patients with no chemotherapy, perioperative and downsizing chemotherapy in conjunction with resection for colorectal liver metastases

Variable

No chemo (n = 199)

Perioperative (n = 59)

Downsizing (n = 46)

p

No. of mets (mean/median)

2.1/1

2.4/2

3.4/3

0.001a

Mets size (cm, median)

3.5/3

2.8/2.1

4.1/3.5

0.003a

Age (year, mean/median)

65.9/66.5

63.7/65.1

62.0/63.6

0.055b

R1 (n, %)

40 (20.2)

12 (20.7)

10 (21.7)

0.973c

N-pos primary (n, %)

68 (36.0)

19 (32.8)

21 (46.7)

0.311c

Clavien-Dindo (1–5)

61 (31.3)

24 (41.4)

16 (35.6)

0.350c

ASA (1/2/3)

20/136/43

5/50/4

2/34/10

0.069c

Synch. mets (n, %)

71 (35.7)

36 (61.0)

30 (65.2)

0.001c

Gender (M/F)

104/95

36/23

26/20

0.475c

Recurrence pattern (n, A/B)

53/82

15/18

20/15

0.256c

Seven of 311 patients had progress on chemotherapy after stage III colon cancer, not included in the analysis

A hepatic recurrence, B extrahepatic recurrence

aKruskal-Wallis test

bOne-way analysis of variance

c χ 2 test

Fig. 3

Time to recurrence according to different chemotherapy regimens. PO chemo compl perioperative chemotherapy completed, Adj. chemo adjuvant chemotherapy after stage III colon cancer (lymph node positive) with progression of liver metastases. Log-rank test: No chemo vs. PO chemo completed, p = 0.045; No chemo vs. downsizing chemo, p = 0.155

Post-recurrence survival (PRS)

Median PRS was 24.3 months and differed according to sites of relapse; liver 30.4; lungs 33.1; abdominal 22.0; liver and lungs 14.3; other combinations 14.8 months as outlined in Fig. 4 (p = 0.002). Five-year PRS in these groups was 23.9, 16.4, 8.7, 4.1 and 13.6 %, respectively. Median PRS was related to the number of recurrence sites; one site 28.8; two 16.8; three 13.5 months (p = 0.001). Hepatic re-resections were performed in n = 57 cases, whereas 9 patients had resections of emerging lung metastases. The number of recurrence sites correlated with a secondary surgical resection (p < 0.001). Of 90 patients with sole hepatic recurrence, 48 underwent resection, 20 chemotherapy, 6 RFA and 9 patients best supportive care. Data were not available in 7 patients. Median PRS (months) varied between these groups; resection 50.0; chemotherapy 15.2; RFA 19.9; best supportive care 5.3 (p < 0.001). Patients with combined recurrence in the liver and lungs underwent resection in 5 of 28 (17.8 %) cases.
Fig. 4

Post-recurrence survival according to sites of relapse. Log-rank test: recurrence in lung vs. liver, p = 0.586; liver vs. abdominal, p = 0.040; liver vs. liver/lung, p = 0.010; liver vs. other combinations, p = 0.012

Overall survival

Three-, 5- and 10-year OS after the first hepatic resection were 58.8, 38.8 and 22.0 %, respectively. Median OS was 45 months. During follow-up, 17 non-CLM-related deaths were observed (other malignant disease n = 2; cardiac disease n = 4; other liver disease n = 2; miscellaneous n = 9). Five-year OS after the second liver resection was 36.8 % and median OS 40.6 months.

Discussion

Single-site hepatic and pulmonic recurrences were most common after surgery for CLM. Positive resection margins, number of metastases and synchronous disease were associated with hepatic recurrence, whereas number and size of metastases and positive primary nodal status were correlated with extrahepatic recurrence. Perioperative chemotherapy increased TTR and OS as well. Patients with single-organ recurrence in the lungs or liver were offered re-resections and/or supplementary chemotherapy had an extended survival.

About two thirds experienced recurrence after hepatic resection with the liver as the most common site (43 %) which is fairly consistent with other reports [7, 9, 10]. Positive margins were associated with hepatic TTR, supporting previous series from de Jong et al. where R1 resection was predictive for hepatic recurrence (HR 1.36) [7]. In a former publication, we also demonstrated a correlation between R1 resections and local recurrence [26]. In cases with synchronous disease, sole hepatic post-resection recurrence may indicate an underestimation of tumour advancement due to preoperatively undetected liver lesions. A limitation in our cohort is the lack of routinely performed preoperative MRI. Several series have shown this modality to be more accurate than CT scan [2730]. With the evolvement of efficient cytotoxic regimens, MRI may also yield additional information in cases of CT-verified complete response [30]. Primary nodal status indicated a high risk for extrahepatic recurrence. This represents most probably a more aggressive clinical course with undetected systemic disease at the time of liver surgery. A recent study by Lee et al. detected a significant distributive variation in metastatic pattern, concatenating a rectal primary with extrahepatic recurrence, and a colon primary with hepatic recurrence, respectively [31]. No such association was verified in the present study.

The indication for perioperative chemotherapy is still reported as controversial [32]. The EORTC intergroup trial 40983 demonstrated an increase in progression-free survival in patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy [5], especially in patients with CEA above 5.0 [33]. However, after a long-term follow-up, no significant benefit was obtained in OS [34]. The current study observed a significant improvement in overall TTR for the perioperative chemotherapy group compared with resection only. This finding was not significant in the site-specific recurrence analysis (Tables 2 and 3), most probably due to an insufficient number of patients. Data from the EORTC trial also demonstrated a reduction in hepatic relapse following perioperative FOLFOX regimen [35]. In our cohort, patients in the perioperative group had more advanced clinical course like synchronous disease and increased number of metastases compared to patients with resection only. Positive margins influenced TTR in cases with response (p < 0.0001) as opposed to patients with stable disease (p = 0.756). In responders after chemotherapy, tumour shrinkage may lead to remaining therapy-resistant islets of malignant cell clusters near the main lesion as well as an irregular surface which may cause local recurrence in cases with narrow or positive margins [36]. Furthermore, we detected a significantly better 5-year OS in the chemotherapy group, with a 5-year OS of 62 % in patients completing chemotherapy, as opposed to other reports [37, 38]. However, our results should be interpreted with caution due to possible selection bias and a heterogeneous cohort mainly retrospectively observed.

Patients in the downsizing group presented an insignificant difference in the univariate (p = 0.155) and multivariate analysis in overall, hepatic and extrahepatic TTR compared with the surgery alone group (Fig. 3 and Tables 2 and 3) despite more adverse tumour load (Table 4). These results support a previous study by Adam et al. [4]. Patients offered resection after progression while on adjuvant chemotherapy after stage III colon surgery demonstrated a short median TTR of 4.6 months. Based on this finding in this small group of patients, surgery may not be beneficial [39].

We demonstrated that PRS was correlated to the site of recurrence. Single-organ lesions in the lungs or liver appeared to have the best outcome. A high proportion of repeated hepatic resections increased the PRS in patients with hepatic recurrence. Five-year OS of 36.8 % after the second resection was comparable to the survival rates after the first resection (5-year OS 38.8 %). A similar survival rate has been demonstrated in several other studies [12, 13, 40]. The use of repeated liver resections varies in the literature. Assumpcao et al. [11] and D’Angelica et al. [9] performed a second resection in 28 and 30 % of the cases with recurrence, respectively, whereas Mise et al. [10] conducted metastasectomy in 85 % of isolated hepatic or lung recurrence. Despite unresectable lesions in the lung, nearly 3-year median survival was observed in the present cohort. This finding may also justify the expanding criteria for liver resection in selected patients with unresectable lung metastases [41]

Conclusions

Sites of recurrence predict the outcome after surgery for CLM. Resection margins, number of metastases and synchronous disease were associated with hepatic recurrence, whereas N positive (primary tumour), number and size of metastases were associated with extrahepatic recurrence. Perioperative chemotherapy prolonged TTR and increased OS significantly. Patients with single-organ relapse have the potential for longevity due to multimodal treatment with repeated resections and supplementary chemotherapy.

Abbreviations

ASA: 

American Society of Anaesthesiologists

CLM: 

colorectal liver metastases

HR: 

hazard ratio

OS: 

overall survival

PRS: 

post-recurrence survival

RFA: 

radio frequency ablation

TTR: 

time to recurrence

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Acute and Digestive Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital
(2)
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen
(3)
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital
(4)
Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital
(5)
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen
(6)
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen

References

  1. Dunne DF, Yip VS, Jones RP, McChesney EA, Lythgoe DT, Psarelli EE, et al. Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam R, Bhangui P, Poston G, Mirza D, Nuzzo G, Barroso E, et al. Is perioperative chemotherapy useful for solitary, metachronous, colorectal liver metastases? Ann Surg. 2010;252:774–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wei AC, Greig PD, Grant D, Taylor B, Langer B, Gallinger S. Survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: a 10-year experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:668–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, Valeanu A, Castaing D, Azoulay D, et al. Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy—a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2004;240:644–57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1007–16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitry E, Fields AL, Bleiberg H, Labianca R, Portier G, Tu D, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4906–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, Strub J, Mentha G, Schulick RD, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:440–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, Abdalla EK, Andres A, Eng C, et al. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2005;241:715–24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Angelica M, Kornprat P, Gonen M, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, et al. Effect on outcome of recurrence patterns after hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1096–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mise Y, Imamura H, Hashimoto T, Seyama Y, Aoki T, Hasegawa K, et al. Cohort study of the survival benefit of resection for recurrent hepatic and/or pulmonary metastases after primary hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2010;251:902–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Assumpcao L, Choti MA, Gleisner AL, Schulick RD, Swartz M, Herman J, et al. Patterns of recurrence following liver resection for colorectal metastases: effect of primary rectal tumor site. Arch Surg. 2008;143:743–9. discussion 749–750.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Adair RA, Young AL, Cockbain AJ, Malde D, Prasad KR, Lodge JP, et al. Repeat hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1278–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulik U, Bektas H, Klempnauer J, Lehner F. Repeat liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:926–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:229–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glimelius B, Sorbye H, Balteskard L, Bystrom P, Pfeiffer P, Tveit K, et al. A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:909–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruers T, Punt C, Van Coevorden F, Pierie JP, Borel-Rinkes I, Ledermann JA, et al. Radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized EORTC Intergroup phase II study (EORTC 40004). Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2619–26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nozawa H, Sunami E, Nakajima J, Nagawa H, Kitayama J. Synchronous and metachronous lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a 20-year monocentric experience. Exp Ther Med. 2012;3:449–56.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Berglund A, Fokstuen T, Tveit KM, Braendengen M, et al. Multicenter phase II study of Nordic fluorouracil and folinic acid bolus schedule combined with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:31–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Punt CJA, Buyse M, Kohne C-H, Hohenberger P, Labianca R, Schmoll HJ, et al. Endpoints in adjuvant treatment trials: a systematic review of the literature in colon cancer and proposed definitions for future trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer—analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309–18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric-estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Society Ser B-Stat Methodol. 1972;34:187.Google Scholar
  26. Angelsen JH, Horn A, Eide GE, Viste A. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases: the impact of resection margins on recurrence and overall survival. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Fischman AJ, Kadavigere R, Blake M, Hahn PF, et al. Detection of liver metastases from adenocarcinoma of the colon and pancreas: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced liver MRI and whole-body FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:239–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA, Downing S, Wilson D, Lodge JP, et al. Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;237:170–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sahani DV, Bajwa MA, Andrabi Y, Bajpai S, Cusack JC. Current status of imaging and emerging techniques to evaluate liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014;259:861–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Auer RC, White RR, Kemeny NE, Schwartz LH, Shia J, Blumgart LH, et al. Predictors of a true complete response among disappearing liver metastases from colorectal cancer after chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116:1502–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee H, Choi DW, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, et al. Recurrence pattern depends on the location of colon cancer in the patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1641–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Ferla F, La Torre M, Aurello P, Ramacciato G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases: what is the evidence? Results of a systematic review of comparative studies. Surgeon. 2015;13:83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorbye H, Mauer M, Gruenberger T, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, et al. Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983). Ann Surg. 2012;255:534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1208–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sorbye H. Recurrence patterns after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;203:243–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ng JKS, Urbanski SJ, Mangat N, McKay A, Sutherland FR, Dixon E, et al. Colorectal liver metastases contract centripetally with a response to chemotherapy—a histomorphologic study. Cancer. 2008;112:362–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu D, Zhong Y, Wei Y, Ye L, Lin Q, Ren L, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86543.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Scoggins CR, Campbell ML, Landry CS, Slomiany BA, Woodall CE, McMasters KM, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy does not increase morbidity or mortality of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:35–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Adam R, Pascal G, Castaing D, Azoulay D, Delvart V, Paule B, et al. Tumor progression while on chemotherapy—a contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases? Ann Surg. 2004;240:1052–64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Salloum C, Andreani P, Pascal G, Sotirov D, et al. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:808–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hwang M, Jayakrishnan TT, Green DE, George B, Thomas JP, Groeschl RT, et al. Systematic review of outcomes of patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of extra hepatic disease. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1747–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Angelsen et al. 2015

Advertisement