Skip to main content

A review of 14 cases of perianal Paget’s disease: characteristics of anorectal cancer with pagetoid spread

Abstract

Background

Perianal Paget’s disease (PPD) is an intraepithelial invasion of the perianal skin and is frequently associated with underlying anorectal carcinoma. The relatively rare nature of this disease has made it difficult to develop treatment recommendations. This study aims to analyze the clinical and pathological features of perianal Paget’s disease (PPD) and to explore rational treatment options and follow-up for this disease.

Methods

The National Cancer Center Hospital database was searched for all cases of perianal Paget’s disease diagnosed between 2006 and 2021. In the 14 patients identified, we reviewed the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adenocarcinoma with pagetoid spread, including suspected or recurrent cases.

Results

All 14 cases met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 4.5 (range, 0.1–13.0) years. Pagetoid spread before initial treatment was suspected in 12 cases (85.7%). Underlying rectal cancer was identified in 6 cases, and no primary tumor was detected in the other 6 cases. Seven patients had recurrent disease, with the median time to recurrence of 34.6 (range, 19.2–81.7) months. The time to the first relapse was 3 months, and that to the second relapse was 6 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 90.0%.

Conclusions

Endoscopic and radiologic evaluation, as well as immunohistologic examination, should be performed. is to differentiate PPD with and without underlying anorectal carcinoma. The time to first recurrence varies widely, and long-term and regular follow-up for more than 5 years is considered necessary for local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Background

Pagetoid spread (PS) is defined as the proliferation of individual cells in the epithelium characterized by erythema and inflammation. It can manifest as mammary or extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) and is described as an apocrine gland tumor that can be benign or malignant with metastatic potential. EMPD has been reported at several extramammary sites, including the axilla, thigh, groin, perineum, scrotum, vulva, and perianal area [1, 2]. When EMPD affects the perianal region, it is called perianal Paget’s disease (PPD). PPD is usually associated with an underlying malignancy, such as anal, rectal, cervical, or urinary bladder adenocarcinoma, with an appearance similar to that of simple PPD without an underlying malignancy [3, 4]. The prognosis of simple PPD is relatively favorable, with overall and disease-free survival of approximately 60% at 5 years [5,6,7]. However, PPD associated with an underlying malignancy has been reported to have a poor prognosis [5,6,7,8,9].

Immunohistochemical analysis of the skin lesion is useful for differentiating whether or not PPD is associated with underlying anorectal adenocarcinoma or carcinoma. Immunohistochemical markers that are frequently used include cytokeratin 7 (CK7), CK20, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), and CDX2. Although CK7 is a sensitive marker for almost all pagetoid neoplasms, it is not practical for differentiating PPD because some rectal adenocarcinomas also express CK7 [10, 11]. CK20 might be expressed in colorectal carcinoma but not in simple PPD [12]. GCDFP-15, which is regarded as a specific marker for apocrine epithelium tissue, is usually positive in simple PPD [13,14,15]. As mentioned above, PPD associated with anorectal carcinoma often has the CK20+/GCDFP-15− immunophenotype. In contrast, simple PPD shows a CK20−/GCDFP-15+ pattern [16]. CDX2, which has a high positivity rate in gastrointestinal cancers, including rectal cancer, has been used [17]. However, about 17% of colorectal cancers are negative for CK20 [18]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the underlying malignancy using a combination of colonoscopy and radiology [19].

Staging classification and treatment outcome

A staging classification for PPD that includes appropriate treatment for each stage has been proposed (Table 1) [9, 20]. The prognosis is good for stage I (Paget’s cells found in the perianal epidermis and adnexa without primary carcinoma) but worsens for stage II (invasive cutaneous disease penetrating the basement membrane and entering the underlying stroma and/or synchronous localized malignancies, i.e., IIa adnexal malignancy and IIb visceral malignancy), stage III (regional metastatic disease), and stage IV (distant metastatic disease).

Table 1 Perianal Paget’s disease classification and accompanying suggested therapy

The treatment options for PPD depend on local (extent and depth of invasion) and regional (lymph node involvement) factors and the extent of systemic disease. Local excision (with macroscopic clearance of surgical margins) has been performed as a treatment for non-invasive PPD but was associated with a high local recurrence rate (40%) [19]. Wide local excision (WLE, >1 cm microscopic clearance of surgical margins) with a sphincter-saving technique was later proposed as the treatment of choice for PPD due to the higher survival rate in patients treated with WLE than in those treated with local excision and due to the better chance of cure and normal survival. The standard treatment for PPD associated with the anorectal canal is abdominoperineal resection (APR) [9, 20]. However, it is recommended that adenocarcinoma of the anal canal be managed in the same way as rectal cancer [21], and transanal local excision is appropriate for selected early-stage rectal cancers [22]. Therefore, even in cases of PPD associated with anal canal cancer, combined transanal local excision and WLE may be an alternative to APR.

The distinction between PPD with and without underlying anorectal cancer is essential [3, 23,24,25] because of the differences in treatment methods and the prognosis [4]. Due to the rarity of PPD, few cases have been reported [24,25,26,27], and long-term outcomes of treatment for PS are unknown. This study aims to analyze the clinical and pathological features of perianal Paget’s disease (PPD) and to explore rational treatment options and follow-up for this disease.

Methods

A search of the National Cancer Center Hospital database identified 14 cases of PPD diagnosed between 2006 and 2021. Cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum or anal canal with pagetoid spread, including suspected and recurrent cases, were retrospectively reviewed for age, sex, tumor size, presence or absence of preoperative endoscopic findings, presence or absence of mapping biopsy, treatment methods, and long-term prognosis.

The study was approved by the National Cancer Center Hospital Institutional Review Board (code: 2017–437). The requirement for written informed consent was waived in view of the retrospective nature of the research and the anonymity of the study data.

Results

All 14 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients (57.1%) were male, and 7 (50.0%) were female (Table 2). The median age was 74 (range, 55–84) years. Twelve patients (85.7%) were suspected of having PS before initial treatment. The most commonly used immunostaining for differentiation was CK7+/CK20+/GCDFP-15−/CDX2+. These 12 patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated for underlying anorectal carcinoma, which was identified in 6 cases. The median size of the primary tumor was 52 (9–110) mm. No primary lesions were detected in the other 6 cases. There were no distant metastases at the initial diagnosis; however, 1 patient had metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes, and another had metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes.

Table 2 Clinicopathologic characteristics

The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 4.5 (range, 0.1–13.0) years. At the last follow-up, 7 patients were alive with no evidence of disease, 4 were alive with recurrent disease, 1 had transferred to another hospital, and 2 had died of disease. A summary of the 13 cases and their clinical course is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 A summary of cases attended

Seven patients (50%) developed recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 34.6 (range 19.2–81.7) months. Three patients had local recurrence, and 4 (28.6%) had a recurrence in the inguinal lymph nodes. One patient had distant metastases. The time to the first relapse was 3 months, and that to the second relapse was 6 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 90.0%.

The initial treatment in the 6 patients with no detectable primary lesion was WLE alone (n=4, 66.7%), APR + WLE (n=1, 16.7%), and radiotherapy (n=1, 16.7%). The outcomes in the 4 patients who underwent WLE alone were as follows: alive with no evidence of disease (n=2), alive with lung metastasis (n=1), and died after inguinal lymph node metastases at first relapse and liver and bone metastases at the second relapse (n=1).

The initial treatment of the 6 patients in whom anorectal carcinoma was detected was APR + WLE (n=3, 50%), transanal local excision + WLE (n=2, 33.3%), and referral to another hospital (n=1, 16.7%). The outcomes in the group that underwent APR + WLE were as follows: alive with no evidence of disease (n=2) and dead (n=1). The outcomes in the group that underwent transanal local excision + WLE were as follows: alive with no evidence of disease (n=1) and alive with recurrent disease (n=1).

In terms of initial treatment, there were 4 recurrences after WLE (with or without transanal local excision), 2 after APR, and 1 after radiotherapy. All 6 cases of recurrence after surgical resection had positive resection margins at the initial surgery. Mapping biopsy was performed in 5 (45.4%) of the 11 patients who underwent surgical resection, and 4 (80.0%) had positive margins. In the 6 cases without mapping biopsy, 2 (33.3%) had positive margins.

Discussion

PPD is usually associated with an underlying malignant anorectal tumor and has a relatively poor prognosis [23] with a high risk of local recurrence [28]. The rate of malignancy associated with PPD ranges from 33 to 86% [29]. In the present study, of the 11 cases of PPD associated with anal canal cancer who presented with CK20+/GCDFP-15− (GCDFP was not examined in some cases), anal cancer could be noted in 6 patients by endoscopic or radiographic evaluation. Immunohistological examination alone is not sufficient to identify underlying malignancy, and it is critical to apply PD staging (Table 1) in conjunction with endoscopic and radiologic evaluation.

In the present study, primary anorectal carcinoma could not be identified preoperatively in half of the patients, and APR was performed in only 1 case. There was 1 death in the WLE group. However, only half of the patients with anorectal cancer underwent APR + WLE to preserve the anus, although there were cases of recurrence-free survival of more than 5 years after WLE. Further investigations are needed to identify cases in which APR should be pursued aggressively and those in which WLE (with or without transanal local excision) can be considered.

The 2 deaths occurred in a patient without an identified primary tumor who underwent WLE alone as the initial treatment (case 1) and in a patient with a primary tumor identified preoperatively who underwent APR + WLE (case 7).

Of the 6 cases in which anal cancer was detected, APR + WLE was performed in 3 patients and Transanal Local Excision was performed in 2 cases. In the latter two cases, the depth of the primary tumor was M/SM1, and recurrence-free survival of 2 to 5 years was achieved. Further investigation is considered to be necessary.

On the other hand, both these fatal cases had inguinal lymph node metastasis as the first relapse, and distant metastasis several months later.

The time to first recurrence varies from 7 months to about 5 years, and it is difficult to predict prognosis in general from the course of the disease, but long-term and regular follow-up for more than 5 years is considered necessary to check for recurrence and distant metastasis.

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of the resection margin has been proposed to reduce the possibility of borderline invasion and minimize the local recurrence rate [19]. However, frozen section analysis of surgical margins in PPD can be misleading and dangerous because it may appear negative intraoperatively but become permanently positive on subsequent histological analysis. It is believed that permanent margin status is not a predictor of local recurrence and that a minimally invasive carcinoma measuring <1 mm probably does not have an adverse prognosis, whereas a deeply invasive carcinoma behaves as a fully malignant adenocarcinoma [30]. Of the five patients who underwent mapping biopsy in this study, four were positive for transection, but only one case resulted in local recurrence. This is consistent with previous studies that have shown that edge evaluation is not a predictor of local recurrence.

There are several potential limitations to this study. First, there is the possibility of selection bias due to the retrospective study design. Second, the sample size is very small (14 cases) and cannot shed light on treatment possibilities, especially the optimal approach and prognosis. Despite these limitations, we believe that our findings warrant more extensive investigation in patients with PPD.

Conclusions

Although skin biopsy and immunohistological diagnosis are useful for distinguishing underlying malignancy in patients with PPD, endoscopic and radiologic evaluation is mandatory. The time to first recurrence varies widely, and long-term and regular follow-up for more than 5 years is considered necessary for local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

EMPD:

Extramammary Paget’s disease

HR:

Hazard ratio

PPD:

Perianal Paget’s disease

PS:

Pagetoid spread

References

  1. Shepherd V, Davidson EJ, Davies-Humphreys J. Extramammary Paget’s disease. BJOG. 2005;112:273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones RE Jr, Austin C, Ackerman AB. Extramammary Paget’s disease. A critical reexamination. Am J Dermatopathol. 1979;1:101–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chumbalkar V, Jennings TA, Ainechi S, Lee EC, Lee H. Extramammary Paget’s disease of anal canal associated with rectal adenoma without invasive carcinoma. Gastroenterology Res. 2016;9:99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao X, Mao W, Lin A. Perianal Paget’s disease co-associated with anorectal adenocarcinoma: primary or secondary disease. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2014;8:186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCarter MD, Quan SH, Busam K, Paty PP, Wong D, Guillem JG. Long-term outcome of perianal Paget’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:612–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarmiento JM, Wolff BG, Burgart LJ, Frizelle FA, Ilstrup DM. Paget’s disease of the perianal region--an aggressive disease? Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchesa P, Fazio VW, Oliart S, Goldblum JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW. Long-term outcome of patients with perianal Paget’s disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:475–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman S, Ihre T, Lagerstedt U, Svensson C. Perianal Paget’s disease: report of five cases. Int J Colorect Dis. 1992;7:167–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shutze WP, Gleysteen JJ. Perianal Paget’s disease. Classification and review of management: report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:502–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith KJ, Tuur S, Corvette D, Lupton GP, Skelton HG. Cytokeratin 7 staining in mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. Mod Pathol. 1997;10:1069–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundquist K, Kohler S, Rouse RV. Intraepidermal cytokeratin 7 expression is not restricted to Paget cells but is also seen in Toker cells and merkel cells. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:212–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases. Modern Pathol. 2000;13:962–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ansai S, Mitsuhashi Y, Kondo S, Manabe M. Immunohistochemical differentiation of extra-ocular sebaceous carcinoma from other skin cancers. J Dermatol. 2004;31:998–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldblum JR, Hart WR. Perianal Paget’s disease: a histologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases with and without associated rectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:170–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohler S, Smoller BR. Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 reactivity in extramammary Paget’s disease with and without associated internal malignancy. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:118–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohnishi T, Watanabe S. The use of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in the diagnosis of primary and secondary extramammary Paget’s disease. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:243–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng HA, Cartun R, Ricci A Jr. Potential diagnostic utility of CDX-2 immunophenotyping in extramammary Paget’s disease. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2005;13:342–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bayrak R, Haltas H, Yenidunya S. The value of CDX2 and cytokeratins 7 and 20 expression in differentiating colorectal adenocarcinomas from extraintestinal gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: cytokeratin 7-/20+ phenotype is more specific than CDX2 antibody. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyriazanos ID, Stamos NP, Miliadis L, Noussis G, Stoidis CN. Extra-mammary Paget’s disease of the perianal region: a review of the literature emphasizing the operative management technique. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehta NJ, Torno R, Sorra T. Extramammary Paget’s disease. South Med J. 2000;93:713–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Cederquist L, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, et al. Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:852–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Cederquist L, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:874–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kubota K, Akasu T, Nakanishi Y, Sugihara K, Fujita S, Moriya Y. Perianal Paget’s disease associated with rectal carcinoma: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:347–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamaura M, Yamada T, Watanabe R, Kawai H, Hirose S, Tajima H, et al. Anal canal adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features accompanying secondary extramammary Paget disease, successfully treated with modified FOLFOX6: a case report. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yukimoto R, Fujino S, Miyoshi N, Ogino T, Takahashi H, Uemura M, et al. A case report of anal canal cancer with pagetoid spread requiring differential diagnosis. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;75:198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Suenaga M, Oya M, Ueno M, Yamamoto J, Yamaguchi T, Mizunuma N, et al. Anal canal carcinoma with pagetoid spread: report of a case. Surg Today. 2006;36:666–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimizu T, Inozume T, Takaki M, Ohnuma T, Sano S, Kawamura T, et al. Case of anal adenocarcinoma in situ with pagetoid spread but without macroscopic abnormality in anal mucosa. J Dermatol. 2017;44:1076–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen SL, Sjølin KE, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Hagen K, Harling H. Paget’s disease of the anal margin. Br J Surg. 1988;75:1089–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanitakis J. Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:581–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldblum JR, Hart WR. Vulvar Paget’s disease: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 19 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21:1178–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sigeki Sekine, all of whom served as staff members at the National Cancer Center Hospital.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JI and KM designed the report, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. ST, YT, MI, and YK collected the patient’s clinical data and coordinated and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konosuke Moritani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from our hospital’s review board (NCC2017437).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imaizumi, J., Moritani, K., Takamizawa, Y. et al. A review of 14 cases of perianal Paget’s disease: characteristics of anorectal cancer with pagetoid spread. World J Surg Onc 21, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02872-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02872-z

Keywords

  • Pagetoid spread
  • Extramammary paget’s disease
  • Anorectal cancer
  • CK20
  • GCDFP-15
  • CDX-2