Open Access

BRAFV600E status and clinical characteristics in solitary and multiple papillary thyroid carcinoma: experience of 512 cases at a clinical center in China

  • Xiangqian Zheng1,
  • Tingting Xia1,
  • Lin Lin1,
  • Songyuan Gao2,
  • Yigong Lee1,
  • Yang Yu1,
  • Songfeng Wei1 and
  • Ming Gao1, 3Email author
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201210:104

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-104

Received: 17 November 2011

Accepted: 8 June 2012

Published: 8 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is one of the most frequent endocrine malignancies. In most cases, it often presents as multifocal tumor. It has been reported that multifocal tumors are associated with elevated risk of lymph node and distant metastases. Multifocality is also one of the factors predicting prognosis. Recent studies show that BRAFV600E mutation occurs more frequently in aggressive PTC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BRAFV600E status and clinicopathological features in multiple and solitary PTC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study to analyze 512 PTC cases who received surgery, including 376 solitary PTCs and 136 multiple PTCs.

Results

Multiple PTC is more related to lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion than solitary PTC. However, the distant metastasis rate and 10-year survival rate showed no difference between these two groups. BRAFV600E mutation status was more frequent in multiple PTC patients with lymph node metastasis and late stage at diagnosis.

Conclusion

BRAFV600E mutation is most commonly associated with extra-thyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis in PTC. Multiple PTC patients with young age, large tumors and BRAFV600E mutation should be followed carefully. Our study provides useful information for PTC patients’ followup and treatment.

Keywords

Papillary thyroid carcinoma Multiple PTC Solitary PTC BRAFV600E mutation

Background

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine neoplasm, and one of the leading causes of death in patients with endocrine cancers [1, 2]. The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing more rapidly than other cancers in both the United States [3] and other countries [4]. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most frequent type of thyroid cancer and represents one of the most frequent endocrine malignancies [57], it originates from the follicular cells of the thyroid. Surgery can cure most well-differentiated thyroid cancer when diagnosed and treated in early stage before the establishment of local or distant metastases. However, there are still some patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer that die of the disease.

PTC is often present as multiple tumors [8, 9]. Postsurgical pathologic analysis has shown that 18% to 87% of PTC have multiple noncontiguous tumor foci in the individual glands, with a dominant tumor and multiple additional smaller foci of microcarcinomas [10, 11]. Studies have also reported that “multiple” tumors arising from metastasis of a single primary carcinoma origin, and “multicentricity” tumors arising independently from different origins in a context of genetic and/or environmental predisposition [1214]. Some clinical factors have been used to predict which patients with thyroid cancer might have worse prognosis. Factors such as older age (>45 years old), male gender, certain histologic subtypes (i.e. tall cell, columnar cell and diffuse sclerosing variants of PTC), tumor size greater than 4 cm and presence of extrathyroidal extension are associated with neck recurrences and distant metastases [1518]. In addition, multiple PTC is associated with increased risks of metastases and regional recurrences [19, 20]. Intra-glandular dissemination from the dominant tumor may serve as an indicator of metastatic potential and more aggressive phenotype.

The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) mutation is the most common genetic alteration in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Of the three forms of Raf kinase, BRAF is the most potent activator of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which plays a major role in the regulation of cell growth, division, and proliferation [21]. An activating mutation of BRAFV600E has been found in 36% to 69% of patients with PTC. This mutation is very prevalent in PTC and is frequent in the tumors in late stages (stages III and IV) of PTC [22, 23], with lymphovascular invasion and metastases [24, 25]. However, other studies did not find any association between BRAFV600E mutation and tumor stage, local invasiveness and lymph node metastasis [26].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features with multiple and solitary PTC, and found that the status of BRAFV600E mutation in multiple PTC and solitary PTC.

Methods

Patients

512 patients with PTC underwent surgery from May 1995 to Jan 2000 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. The diagnosis of PCT was pathologically confirmed in all patients (Table 1). 376 patients (281 female and 95 malewith mean age of 42.5 ± 17.4, 4–78 years old) had solitary PTC. 136 patients (104 female and 32 male, with mean age of 44.3 ± 15.1, 6–76 years old) had multiple PTC, including 79 patients with 2 separated tumor foci, 28 patients with 3 tumor foci, 29 patients with four or more tumor foci. Thus, we investigated a total of 369 PTC foci in 136 multiple PTC patients.
Table 1

Clinicopathological Characteristics of 512 cases of PTCs

Characteristics

Number

Number of patients

512

Male/female

127/385

Mean age (yr) ± SD

43.5 ± 16.4 (4–78)

Mean size (cm) ± SD

1.58 ± 1.35

  Less than 1 cm

235 (45.9%)

  1 cm - 2 cm

173 (33.8%)

  2 cm – 4 cm

73 (14.3%)

  More than 4 cm

31 (6.0%)

Multiple

136 (26.6%)

Extra-thyroidal invasion

128 (25.0%)

Lymph node metastasis

207 (40.4%)

Distant metastasis

20 (3.9%)

Recurrence

36 (7.0%)

Family history

13 (2.5%)

BRAFv600E mutation

263 (51.4%)

TNM stage

 

  I

242 (47.3%)

  II

151 (29.5%)

  III

83 (16.2%)

  IV

36 (7.0%)

The TNM stage is based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition (2002).

Treatment and follow-up of PTC

The patients were treated with thyroidectomy in the Department of head and neck. The initial treatment was lobectomy and total/ near total thyroidectomy, central neck and/or lateral-cervical lymph node dissection when necessary,. (According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 1995) Tumor samples were obtained in accordance with protocols approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was achieved 1 day before surgery together with the surgical one.

Histological diagnosis was made independently, in a blinded fashion, by two pathologists. Tumors were classified according to the histopathological typing of the World Health Organization. The multifocal or solitary tumor was identified by pathologist. A concordance rate of 98% was obtained between the two pathologists. The few discordant cases were discussed with a third pathologist.

131I postoperative administration was performed for thyroid remnant ablation when the patient received total or near-total thyroidectomy, L-thyroxine (L-T4) suppressive therapy. Additional 131I therapies were given to treat local recurrences or distant metastases that were not removable by surgery. The patients was performed cervical ultrasound and TSH-suppressed thyroglobulin 6 months after treatment, the anti-throglubulin antibody and T3, T4, TSH, serum thyroglobulin was measured after thyroxine withdrawal or rhTSH stimulation approximately 12 months after the ablation to verify absence of disease.

Criteria for disease remission were negative for 131I Whole Body Scanning (WBS) and Tg < 2 ng/mL after L-T4 withdrawal or recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone injection. The diagnosis of recurrence was made after observing an elevation of Tg levels associated with focal areas of 131I uptake at WBS and/or evidence of lesions at ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) and/or positive cytology examination. 435 patients were followed up by reviewing the clinical records for 10 years or to the death of patients. 46 patients were dead in 10 years, 77 patients were lost of follow up.

Tumor sample preparation and examination

Specimens from surgery were cut and fixed in 10% formalin for preparing paraffin-embedded sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) for histologic examination. One to 3 representative sections of the tumor and all suspicious lesions were submitted for microscopic examination by two endocrine pathologists. The diagnosis of PTC was based on characteristic architectural features, including the presence of true papillae and/or characteristic nuclear changes, such as ground glass nuclei, nuclear pseudoinclusions, and nuclear grooves.

Detection of BRAFV600E mutation

DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue. Briefly, unstained tumor tissues on 20-mm-thick sections were chosen by comparing to H & E-stained sections. For larger tumors, the marked areas were deparaffined and tissues were collected. For small tumors, laser-capture microdissection was performed to collect tissues. Samples from large tumors were incubated in TE9 (0.5 M TRIS, 0.2 M EDTA, 0.01 M sodium chloride, and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate; pH 9.0) and 0.2 mg/ml of proteinase K for 4 days at 55°C. Small tumor samples in Laser-capture microdissection caps were incubated in TE9 for 2 days at 37°C. Fresh proteinase K was added daily. Samples were centrifuged and supernatants were subjected to digestion for two additional days at 55°C. Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad) was added to each sample and incubated for 1 hour and the supernatant was removed. DNA was extracted using phenol–chloroform and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. DNA was resuspended in TRIS–EDTA (10 mM TRIS hydrochloride and 1 mM EDTA; pH 8.0).

DNA samples were applied for PCR analysis using the following primers: BRAF 11F (5′-TCCCTCTCAGGCATAAGGTAA-3′) and BRAF 11R (5′-CGAACAGTGAATATTTCCTTTGAT-3′; PCRproduct, 312 bp) for exon BRAF11, and primers BRAF 15F (5′-TCATAATGCTTGCTCTGATAGGA-3′) and BRAF 15R (5′-GGCCAAAAATTTAATCAGTGGA-3′; PCR product, 223 bp) for exon BRAF 15.

Cycle sequencing of the purified PCR products was performed by using one of the PCR primers and the big dye terminator sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The Sephadex G-50–purified cycle sequencing products were analyzed using an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 11.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare frequencies between groups. All data were expressed as means ± SD. Differences between group means were compared by the independent sample Student t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Comparison of progression between patients with solitary and multiple PTC

Papillary thyroid carcinomas represent about 90% of all thyroid cancers and tumor incidence has been increasing in recent decades [2, 10]. Although PTC patients generally respond in a favorable manner and have a favorable prognosis, many develop recurrence and some die from this disease. Pathological analysis of patients with PTC undergoing surgical treatment have shown that the incidence of multiple noncontiguous tumor foci in individual glands is high [27, 28]. Thus, we evaluated progression of disease between patients with solitary and multiple PTC.

Large tumor size, age, gender, extra-thyroidal invasion, lymph node and distant metastasis, and the variant of the PTC are the main determinants for poor prognosis in PTC patients.

We performed a retrospective study of 376 patients with solitary PTC and 136 patients with multiple PTC to assess the risk factors in disease progression at diagnosis, including sex, age at diagnosis, extra-thyroidal extension, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis (including lung, bone and liver) Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and 10-year survival rate, etc (Table 2). Our results showed that the Micro variant, rate of lymph node metastasis, and tumor recurrence in patients with were significantly higher in patients of multiple PTC than those with solitary PTC (p < 0.001). Tumor size, vascular invasion, incidence of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and having family history were also higher in patients with multiple PTC compared to those in patients with solitary PTC (p < 0.05). However, other clinical parameters that we evaluated showed no significant differences between these two groups. The 10-year survival rate between multiple PTC and solitary PTC has no significant difference (Figure 1).
Table 2

Comparison of progression between patients with solitary and multiple PTC

 

Multiple PTC

solitary PTC

P value

Number

136

376

 

Male/female

32/104

95/281

0.451

Mean age (yr) ± SD

44.3 ± 15.1

42.5 ± 17.4

0.226

Mean size (cm) ± SD

1.29 ± 1.44

1.67 ± 1.15

0.048

Micro variant

84 (61.8%)

147(39.1%)

< 0.001

Tall cell variant

17 (12.5%)

38 (10.1%)

0.267

Extrathyroidal invasion

35 (25.9%)

93 (24.7%)

0.450

Vascular invasion

15 (11.0%)

16 (4.3%)

0.006

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

36 (26.5%)

61 (16.2%)

0.007

Lymph node metastasis

74 (54.4%)

123 (32.7%)

< 0.001

Distant metastasis

6 (4.4%)

14 (3.7%)

0.447

Recurrence

21 (15.4%)

15 (4.0%)

< 0.001

10-year survival rate

125 (91.9%)

341 (90.7%)

0.579

BRAFv600E mutation

75 (55.1%)

188 (50%)

0.176

Family history

7 (5.1%)

6 (1.6%)

0.032

TNM stage

   

  I

56 (41.2%)

186 (49.5%)

 

  II

40 (29.4%)

111 (29.5%)

0.031

  III

24 (17.6%)

59 (15.7%)

 

  IV

16 (11.8%)

20 (5.3%)

 

The TNM stage is based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition (2002).

Figure 1

Comparison of 10-year survival rate between solitary and multiple PTC.

Lymph node metastasis, as a sign of high aggressiveness, has been reported to be a risk factor for persistence/recurrence of disease and also for cancer-related mortality in many studies [2931]. Our data show that multiple PTC correlates with higher lymph node metastasis. We analyzed clinical parameters in multiple PTC patients in the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis.(Table 3) We found that the younger age, larger tumor size, extra-thyroidal extension, vascular invasion and distant metastases have an significant association with lymph node metastases in multiple PTC (p < 0.05).
Table 3

Clinical parameters in multiple PTC patients in the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis

Lymph node metastasis

Yes

No

P value

Number

74 (54.4%)

62 (45.6%)

 

Age (years)

41.5 ± 12.2 (9–60)

50.3 ± 14.2 (18–75)

0.028

Tumor diameter (mm)

2.08 ± 1.51

1.13 ± 1.36

0.016

Extrathyroidal invasion

26 (35.1%)

9 (14.5%)

0.005

Vascular invasion

13 (17.6%)

2 (3.2%)

0.007

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

23 (31.1%)

13 (21.0%)

0.128

Distant metastasis

6 (8.1%)

0 (0%)

0.024

In patients with surgical treatment for PTC, pathological analysis commonly identifies multiple noncontiguous tumor foci in individual glands. Estimates of the frequency of such multiple tumors vary, between 18 and 87 percent depending on the techniques used. Multiple tumors have been associated with increased risk of lymph node and distant metastases, persistent local disease after initial treatment, and regional recurrence [32]. Therefore, our results are consistent with previous reported studies that patients with multiple PTC associate with increased risk of lymph-node metastases and regional recurrence. However, in this study, distant metastasis did not significantly differ. All these findings suggest that patients with multiple papillary thyroid cancer should receive aggressive treatment. According to the guideline by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (Table 2). An association can be made when comparing tumor stage in patients with solitary and multiple PTC. More stage III/IV cases were found in multiple PTC patients compared to those in solitary PTC patients. Consistently, the number of patients with stage I is higher in solitary PTC patients than that in multiple PTC.

BRAFV600E mutational status and clinicopathologic characteristics in 512 patients of PTC

BRAFV600E is the most prevalent genetic alteration implicated in the initiation and progression of PTC, especially in aggressive subtypes such as the tall cell variant of PTC and in those with extra-thyroidal extension and lymph node or distant metastases. The mutation has been associated with both radioactive iodine refractoriness and PTC recurrence. Xing et al. [33, 34] have reviewed studies of the association between the BRAFV600E mutation and clinicopathologic characteristics in PTC. In a review of 12 studies with a total of 1,168 patients. Lee et al. [35, 36] reported that the BRAFV600E mutation was detected in 49% (570/1,168) cases. Recent studies report a varying prevalence of the mutation in PTC, ranging from 29 to 83%.

Correlation analysis between the BRAFV600E mutation status and the clinicopathologic characteristics of PTC patients revealed that extra-thyroidal invasion, central and lateral lymph node metastasis were significantly higher when BRAFV600E mutation is present(p < 0.001). Elder age and male gender are much more prevalent in BRAFV600E mutation patients (p < 0.05). However, the BRAFV600E mutation was not significantly associated with multiple PTC and distant metastasis (Table 4).
Table 4

BRAF V600E mutational status in 512 patients of PTC

Characteristic

BRAFV600E mutation

P value

Positive

Negative

Number

263

249

 

Age (yr)

45.4 ± 12.3

40.8 ± 16.2

0.028

Male/ Female ratio

79/184

48/201

0.003

Extrathyroidal invasion

91 (34.6%)

37 (14.9%)

< 0.001

Multiple PTC

75 (28.5%)

61 (24.5%)

0.184

Central LNM*

151 (57.4%)

56 (22.5%)

< 0.001

Lateral LNM*

83 (31.6%)

31 (12.5%)

< 0.001

Distant metastasis

18 (6.8%)

12 (4.8%)

0.261

LNM: lymph node metastases.

Many other studies have found that the BRAFV600Emutation is most commonly associated with extra-thyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and advanced disease stage. [37] Our data also found a significant association between the BRAFV600E mutation and extra-thyroidal invasion and lymph node metastasis. This study also showed that the BRAFV600E mutation correlated with male gender and elder age.

We also compared clinicopathological characteristics and BRAFV600E mutation status between solitary and multiple PTC. (Table 5) No significant difference in age, extra-thyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were found between solitary and multiple PTC with BRAFV600E mutations, beside the male gender.
Table 5

Correlation between clinicopathological characteristic and BRAF V600E mutation in solitary PTC and multiple PTC

Characteristic

BRAFV600E mutation patients

solitary PTC (188)

multiple PTC (75)

P value

Age (yr)

   

Less than 45

67 (35.6%)

30 (40%)

0.3

45 or older

121 (64.4%)

45 (60%)

 

Gender

   

Male

62 (33.0%)

17 (22.7%)

0.045

Female

126 (67.0%)

58 (77.3%)

 

Extrathyroidal invasion

   

Yes

66 (35.1%)

25 (33.3%)

0.451

No

122 (64.9%)

50 (66.7%)

 

Lymph node metastasis

   

Yes

104 (55.3%)

47 (62.7%)

0.171

No

84 (44.7%)

28 (37.3%)

 

Distant metastasis

   

Yes

13 (6.9%)

5 (6.7%)

0.591

No

175 (93.1%)

70 (93.3%)

 

Comparison of the effects of BRAFV600E mutation on progression in multiple PTC patients

The multiple foci in papillary thyroid carcinoma is a common clinical finding, but the origin of these foci is ambiguous. Despite attempts to establish whether multiple intra-thyroidal tumors are metastases of a primary thyroid tumor or arise independently, the question remains unresolved. Evidence from previous studies has lent support to both arguments. We analyzed whether multiple intra-thyroidal tumors were metastases of a primary thyroid tumor cell or arise independently from different tumor cells, and effects of tumor foci origin on disease progression. We assessed the origin of multiple PTC by analyzing the BRAFV600E mutation status in the multiple PTC. The status of the BRAFV600E mutation was heterogeneous (35 mixed BRAFV600E mutation status of 75 BRAFV600E mutation multiple PTC) in 46.7% cases, suggesting at least some of multiple PTC arise as independent tumors. It’s difficult to study whether those with same BRAF change are from the same origin, since BRAF is a hot spot mutation and many cases have the same change just by chance. It should be noted that the possibility cannot be excluded that tumors with or without BRAFV600E mutation in PTC have a unique clonal origin, because BRAFV600E mutation is a common genetic alteration in PTC and more than one tumor foci may have this mutation at the same time. In our study, 46.7% multiple PTC are heterogeneous.

Studies have showed that BRAFV600E mutation was significantly more frequent in multiple PTC patients with extra-thyroid invasion, and lymph nodes metastasis. These observations indicate that BRAFV600E mutation may be a predictor of tumors with high aggressiveness [3840]. Therefore, we evaluated the status of BRAFV600E mutation in progression of multiple PTC patients. In these 136 patients with multiple PTC, 40 patients (29.4%) had BRAFV600E mutation in all foci, 61 patients (44.9%) patients showed negative for BRAFV600E mutation in all foci, and 35 patients (25.7%) showed mixed status for BRAFV600E mutation (BRAFV600E mutation positive and negative tumor foci coexisted in the same patient). When we analyzed BRAFV600E mutation status in multiple PTC, we found that BRAFV600E mutation mixed status was more frequent in patients with more than 4 tumors compared with patients with 2 or 3 tumors.

Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the BRAFV600E mutation was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and late age at diagnosis (≤14 year old in patients) with multiple PTC. However, there was no difference in tall cell variant, extra-thyroidal invasion, vascular invasion, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, distant metastasis and 10-year survival rate between multiple PTC patients with or without BRAFV600E mutation (Table 6).
Table 6

The effects of BRAF V600E mutation on progression in multiple PTC patients

BRAFv600E mutation

All negative

All positive

Mixed

P value

Number

61

40

35

 

Age ≤ 14

15 (24.6%)

1 (2.5%)

1 (2.9%)

0.001

Tall cell variant

3 (4.9%)

8 (20.0%)

6 (17.1%)

0.597

Extrathyroidal invasion

10 (16.4%)

17 (42.5%)

8 (22.9%)

0.214

Vascular invasion

3 (4.9%)

8 (20.0%)

4 (11.4%)

0.097

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

12 (19.7%)

14 (35.0%)

10 (28.6%)

0.088

Lymph node metastasis

27 (44.3%)

32 (80.0%)

15 (42.9%)

< 0.001

Distant metastasis

1 (1.6%)

3 (7.5%)

2 (5.7%)

0.065

10-year survival rate

56 (91.8%)

35 (87.5%)

34 (97.1%)

0.336

Conclusion

In conclusion, we showed in this study that late stage tumors, lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion in multiple PTC patients are more frequent than those in solitary PTC patients. In patients with multiple PTC, the status of lymph node metastasis was related to the early age at diagnosis, the larger tumor, extra-thyroidal invasion, and BRAFV600E mutation status. Therefore, multiple PTC patients with young age, large tumors and BRAFV600E mutation should be treated and follow-up carefully.

Abbreviations

PTC: 

Papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Baocun Sun in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital for providing materials, the members of Dr. Gao’s department for their assistance in the discussion, and Dr. Yan F, Professor, Venderbilt university school of medicine, Dr. Jiao Y, John Hopkins Kimmel Cancer center for scientific and language editing.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Oncology Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
(2)
Department of Pathology, Tsinghua University Medical College, Tsinghua University
(3)
Department of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute

References

  1. Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR: A national cancer data base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985–1995. Cancer. 1998, 83: 2638-2648. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12<2638::AID-CNCR31>3.0.CO;2-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schlumberger MJ: Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Eng J Med. 1998, 338: 297-306. 10.1056/NEJM199801293380506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies L, Welch HG: Thyroid cancer survival in the United States: observational data from 1973 to 2005. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010, 136 (5): 440-444. 10.1001/archoto.2010.55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Leenhardt L, Bernier MO, Boin-Pineau MH: Advances in diagnostic practices affect thyroid cancer incidence in France. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004, 150 (2): 133-139. 10.1530/eje.0.1500133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G, Pupi A, Castagnoli A, Rosai J: Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A clinicopathologic study of 241 cases treated at the University of Florence, Italy. Cancer. 1985, 55: 805-828. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850215)55:4<805::AID-CNCR2820550419>3.0.CO;2-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Russell WO, Ibanez ML, Clark RL, White EC: Thyroid carcinoma classification, intraglandular dissemination, and clinicopathological study based upon whole organ section of 80 glands. Cancer. 1963, 16: 1425-1460. 10.1002/1097-0142(196311)16:11<1425::AID-CNCR2820161106>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Udelsman R, Chen H: The current management of thyroid cancer. Adv Surg. 1999, 33: 1-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLellis RA: Pathology and genetics of thyroid carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2006, 94: 662-669. 10.1002/jso.20700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Katoh R, Sasaki J, Kurihara H, Suzuki K, Iida Y, Kawaoi A: Multiple thyroid involvement (intraglandular metastasis) in papillary thyroid carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 105 consecutive patients. Cancer. 1992, 70: 1585-1590. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920915)70:6<1585::AID-CNCR2820700623>3.0.CO;2-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM: Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 1994, 97: 418-428. 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90321-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Matos PS, Ferreira AP, Ward LS: Prevalence of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid in Brazilian autopsy and surgic series. Endocr Pathol. 2006, 17: 165-173. 10.1385/EP:17:2:165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sugg SL, Ezzat S, Rosen IB, Freeman JL, Asa SL: Distinct multiple RET/PTC gene rearrangements in multiple papillary thyroid neoplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83: 4116-4122. 10.1210/jc.83.11.4116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moniz S, Catarino AL, Marques AR, Cavaco B, Sobrinho L, Leite V: Clonal origin of non-medullary thyroid tumours assessed by non-random X-chromosome inactivation. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002, 146: 27-33. 10.1530/eje.0.1460027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shattuck TM, Westra WH, Ladenson PW, Arnold A: Independent clonal origins of distinct tumor foci in multiple papillary thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 2406-2412. 10.1056/NEJMoa044190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Roti E, Degli Uberti EC, Bondanelli M, Braverman LE: Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008, 159: 659-673. 10.1530/EJE-07-0896.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pazaitou-Panayiotou K, Capezzone M, Pacini F: Clinical features and therapeutic implication of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2007, 17: 1085-1092. 10.1089/thy.2007.0005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hay ID, Grant CS, Van Heerden JA, Goellner JR, Ebersold JR, Bergstralh EJ: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 535 cases observed in a 50-year period. Surgery. 1992, 112: 1139-1146. discussion 1146–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baudin E, Travagli JP, Ropers J: Microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland: the Gustave–Roussy Institute experience. Cancer. 1998, 83: 553-559. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980801)83:3<553::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chow SM, Law SC, Chan JK, Au SK, Yau S, Lau WH: Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and multiple. Cancer. 2003, 98: 31-40. 10.1002/cncr.11442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. ItoK SuginoK, OzakiO MimuraT, IwasakiH ItoK: Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. J Endocrinol Invest. 1998, 21: 445-448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Aherne Sinéad T, Smyth Paul C, Flavin Richard J: Geographical mapping of a multiple thyroid tumour using genetic alteration analysis & miRNA profiling. Mol Cancer. 2008, 7: 89-10.1186/1476-4598-7-89.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Namba H, Nakashima M, Hayashi T, Hayashida N, Maeda S, Rogounovitch TI: Clinical implication of hot spot BRAF mutation, V599E, in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 4393-4397. 10.1210/jc.2003-030305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nikiforova MN, Kimura ET, Gandhi M, Biddinger PW, Knauf JA, Basolo F: BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors are restricted to papillary carcinomas and anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas arising from papillary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 5399-5404. 10.1210/jc.2003-030838.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu X, Quiros RM, Gattuso P, Ain KB, Prinz RA: High prevalence of BRAF gene mutation in papillary thyroid carcinomas and thyroid tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4561-4567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim KH, Kang DW, Kim SH, Seong IO, Kang DY: Mutations of the BRAF gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma in a Korean population. Yonsei Med J. 2004, 45: 818-821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Puxeddu E, Moretti S, Elisei R, Romei C, Pascucci R, Martinelli M: BRAF (V599E) mutation is the leading genetic event in adult sporadic papillary thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 2414-2420. 10.1210/jc.2003-031425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazeh H, Samet Y, Hochstein D, Mizrahi I, Ariel I, Eid A, Freund HR: Multiple in well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas calls for total thyroidectomy. Am J Surg. 2010, 9: 22-Google Scholar
  28. Vriens MR, Suh I, Moses W: Clinical features and genetic predisposition to hereditary nonmedullary thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009, 19: 1343-1349. 10.1089/thy.2009.1607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang BY, Lin JD, Chao TC: Therapeutic outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer patients in different risk groups. Oncology. 2011, 80 (1–2): 123-129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bozec A, Dassonville O, Chamorey E: Clinical impact of cervical lymph node involvement and central neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 368 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011, 268 (8): 1205-1212. 10.1007/s00405-011-1639-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iida F, Yonekura M, Miyakawa M: Study of intraglandular dissemination of thyroid cancer. Cancer. 1969, 24: 764-771. 10.1002/1097-0142(196910)24:4<764::AID-CNCR2820240416>3.0.CO;2-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Xiaoqi Lin, Finkelstein Sydney D, Bing Zhu, Silverman Jan F: Molecular analysis of multiple papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Mol Endocrinol. 2008, 41: 195-203. 10.1677/JME-08-0063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing M: BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer: pathogenic role, molecular bases, and clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2007, 28: 742-762. 10.1210/er.2007-0007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Frasca F: BRAF(V600E) mutation and the biology of papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008, 15: 191-205. 10.1677/ERC-07-0212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee JH, Lee ES, Kim YS: Clinicopathologic significance of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid. Cancer. 2007, 110: 38-46. 10.1002/cncr.22754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nucera C, Goldfarb M, Hodin R: Role of B-Raf (V600E) in differentiated thyroid cancer and preclinical validation of compounds against B-Raf (V600E). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1795 (2): 152-161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim TY, Kim WB, Rhee YS: The BRAF mutation is useful for prediction of clinical recurrence in low-risk patients with conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006, 65: 364-368. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02605.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Howell Gina M, Carty Sally E, Armstrong Michaele J: Both BRAF V600E mutation and older age (>65 Years)are associated with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 5: 19-Google Scholar
  39. Trovisco V, de Vieira Castro I, Soares P, Ma’ximo V, Silva P, Magalhaes J: BRAF mutations are associated with histologic types of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Pathol. 2004, 202: 247-251. 10.1002/path.1511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Trovisco V, Soares P, Preto A, de Vieira Castro I, Lima J, Castro P: Type and prevalence of BRAF mutations are closely associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma histotype and patients’ age but not with tumour aggressiveness. Virchows Arch. 2005, 446: 589-595. 10.1007/s00428-005-1236-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement