Skip to main content
Download PDF

Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients aged 60 and older: a retrospective cohort study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 20, Article number: 396 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective laparoscopic surgical excision is the recommended treatment for liver cancers, yet its benefits in patients aged 60 and older remain poorly understood. Thus, this study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy for patients aged 60 and older with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

After screening, 107 patients who underwent hepatectomy for ICC were enrolled and grouped into either laparoscopic (LH) or open hepatectomy (OH) groups. Baseline characteristics, pathological findings, and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Among baseline characteristics and pathological findings, only pre-operative albumin was higher in the LH group. The LH group had more favorable short-term outcomes such as incision length, level of postoperative total bilirubin, and length of postoperative stays than the OH group. The postoperative complication, lymph node dissection and R0 resection rate, and long-term outcomes including OS and DFS were not significantly different between the two groups. Cancer Antigen-19-9(CA-19-9) and pathological differentiation were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas CA-19-9 and neutrophil count were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

Conclusion

LH is safe, reliable, and feasible for treatment of ICC patients aged 60 and older as it had better short-term clinical outcomes than OH and achieved long-term prognoses that were comparable to those of OH.

Introduction

Liver cancers are highly malignant, often fatal, and have a global occurrence [1, 2]. They are classified, based on the source of tumor cells, into either hepatocellular carcinomas or cholangiocarcinoma, with the latter having more aggressiveness and poorer prognoses [2,3,4]. Anatomically, cholangiocarcinoma is divided into extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and the more common intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Most incidences of ICC are found in individuals aged 60 and older because the typical age for the onset of ICC is between 50 and 70 years [5]. Despite patients aged 60 and older having a low tolerance for intensive surgery, inferior cardiopulmonary function, and high risk of postoperative complications, complete surgical excision remains currently preferred treatment for all ICC patients [6, 7]. This surgical excision is performed via either conventional open hepatectomy (OH) or laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). With the advance of modern medicine in terms of minimally invasive surgery and laparoscopic techniques in particular, LH has several advantages such as mild trauma, rapid recovery, lower intensity of pain, and short hospital stays [8, 9]. Nonetheless, LH may nonetheless lead to increased risk of cardiorespiratory and unpredictable problems [10]. Currently, the benefits of LH for ICC patients who were older remain poorly understood. Therefore, the present study examined short- and long-term outcomes of patients aged 60 and older with ICC who had undergone either OH or LH. The study also assessed potential risk factors for prognosis.

Materials and methods

Patient enrollment

Between January 2011 and October 2021, 107 ICC patients who had undergone hepatectomies at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China, were enrolled, having fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) patient with ICC confirmed by postoperative pathology, (2) patient underwent complete surgical tumor resection without macroscopic residual tumor (R0 or R1) and absence of distant metastasis, and (3) patient was monitored until date of mortality/last check-up. Surgical procedures were selected based on the following criteria: (1) According to whether it is minimally invasive surgery or not, the patients and their families chose the open or laparoscopic approach independently, (2) the surgeon evaluated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery based on the location of the tumor, and (3) some patients who chose open surgery because of the difficulty of surgery were excluded (two patients who converted to open surgery due to intraoperative massive bleeding). In total, 29 patients who only underwent laparoscopic surgery during tumor resection were divided into the LH group, and 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration or open surgery were divided into OH group. The present research represents a retrospective study, and the data used in this study were queried from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University databases, following approval by the hospital.

Preoperative preparation

Both liver function tests and preoperative hematology examinations were conducted on all patients. Further, patients were regularly provided with support therapy and monitored using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electrocardiograms (ECG), echocardiography, and specifically monitored via automatic 3D liver organ reconstruction that was used for on-demand volumetric analysis. Before surgery, patients fasted immediately prior to gastric tube insertion. Lastly, preoperative assessments and re-operative health education were required of all patients.

Surgical technique

All patients were placed in the supine position after general anesthesia was administered. Routine surgical disinfection and draping were performed. For the LH group, pneumoperitoneum was established using the infraumbilical port, followed by insertion of three or four additional trocars. Before liver resection, tourniquets were prepared to possibly block the portal vein. Sterile gauze was used to expose the operative field and clean the surgical area. Standard laparoscopic instruments and an ultrasonic scalpel were used for surgical procedures such as partial hepatectomy, segment hepatectomy, and lobectomy whose election was determined by tumor location. If necessary, intraoperative ultrasonic and indocyanine green were used to locate tumors. For the major hepatectomy which involved 3 liver segments, and extended liver resection which involved more than 3 liver segments, such as left hemihepatectomy or right hemihepatectomy, we preferred the extrahepatic Glissonean approach. Minor liver resection was defined as the removal of one or two segments, the hepatic parenchymal transection approach was the preferred choice. For the OH group, traditional open hepatectomy was done with an anti-L-shaped incision of ca. 30cm. An ultrasonic scalpel (similar to that used in the LH group) was used to cut liver tissue, whereas absorbable and home-lock clamps were used to occlude the bile duct and vascular system. Bipolar electro-coagulation was regularly performed for hemostasis. Lymph node dissection (LND) is generally not performed in all patients at the center of our study, conversely, only performed in patients with enlarged lymph nodes on preoperative imaging or detected during intraoperative examination.

Postoperative management

After surgery, all patients received professional postoperative management, nutritional support, rehydration, symptomatic support, and standard postoperative analgesic plans. On the first and third postoperative days, blood routine, coagulation tests, liver, and kidney functions and other indicators were examined. Additionally on the first postoperative days, gastric tubes were removed and on the fourth postoperative days, abdominal CT scans were done to assess patients’ intra-abdominal condition.

Data collection and definitions

Patient’s medical records, which included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative hematology and chemistries, intraoperative data, postoperative, and follow-up data, were collected retrospectively. Postoperative follow-ups were performed once every 3 months via telephone interviews. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration between surgery and death, and disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the post-surgery duration that had no signs of disease. The 8th edition of AJCC/UICC TNM staging system and the Clavien-Dindo complication classification system were used to evaluate postoperative complications. According to the WHO latest principles of antibiotic classification, the antibiotic usage was divided into two categories: nonrestricted antibiotics and other antibiotic (restricted antibiotics and special class antibiotic).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as percentages and the statistical significance of their comparisons was assessed using either χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. Continuous variables were expressed as medians/25th–75th percentiles/means/± standard deviations, and the statistical significance of their comparisons was assessed using either Student’s t or Mann–Whitney U tests. OS and DFS curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Risk factors for OS and DFS were analyzed by Cox regression. All statistical analyses were done in SPSS Statistics V.25 (IBM SPSS Software) and/or R V.3.5.3, and a 0.05 alpha level was used for all tests.

Results

Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups are summarized in the Table 1. Patients in LH and OH groups did not significantly differ (p>0.05) in terms of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, and hepatitis B virus infection. In addition, there were 11 (14.1%) and 5 (17.2%) patients with liver cirrhosis in the OH and the LH group, respectively, which was no significant differences (p=0.921). Moreover, no significant differences (p>0.05) in portal hypertension, ascites, preoperative antitumor treatment, and all preoperative blood tests except preoperative albumin (Alb) levels, which were significantly lower (p=0.039) in the OH compared to the LH group. However, the mean values of Alb for both groups were over the lower limit of normal, which is 40 g/L in our research center (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of the baseline characteristics between OH and LH groups
Full size table

Pathological findings

A comparison of pathological findings between the OH and LH groups was as summarized in Table 2. Although the proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis was higher in the OH than the LH group (20.5 vs. 6.9%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.167). Other parameters without statistically significant differences in the two groups were pathological differentiation, tumor number, tumor diameter, TNM stage, surgical margin, microscopic microvascular invasion, microscopic perineural invasion, and satellite foci. It should be mentioned that no differences in major hepatectomy ratio were found between the two groups of our study (64.1 vs. 58.6%, p=0.167).

Table 2 Comparison of the pathologic findings between the OH and LH groups
Full size table

Surgical outcomes

Surgical outcomes for both OH and LH groups are summarized in Table 3. Incision lengths were obviously significantly shorter in the LH than OH group (5.7±2.3 vs. 20.1±1.5 p=0.000). Differences in operation time, albumin infusion, and intraoperative and postoperative transfusions were not statistically significant (p=0.907, p=0.070, p=0.185, and p=0.555, respectively). Similarly, R0 resection (92.3 vs. 93.1% p=1.000), liver door block (34.6 vs. 55.2% p=0.054) rates, and LND (47.4 vs. 27.6% p=0.064) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in the comparison of the number of lymph nodes between the groups (p=0.165). The LH group, had no intraperitoneal infections, incision-related complications, delayed gastric emptying, and bile leakage nor ICU admissions. The number of other postoperative complications—arrhythmology (0 vs. 3.4% p=0.271), peritoneal effusion (12.8 vs. 6.9% p=0.604), lung infection (14.1 vs. 3.4% p=0.227), myocardial infarction (0 vs. 6.9% p=0.072), and heart failure (2.6 vs. 10.3% p=0.122)—did not significantly differ between the two. Furthermore, grading of antibiotic was not different in both groups (p=1.000). Table 3 summarizes results of hematological examinations undertaken on the first postoperative day—total bilirubin levels (TBIL) were significantly higher in the OH than LH group (p=0.01). Plasma ALT and AST levels (median 297.0 and 261.5, respectively) in the OH group were higher than those (median 208.0 and 242, respectively) in the LH group (p=0.271 and p=0.446, respectively).

Table 3 Comparison of the surgical outcomes and follow-up outcomes between OH and LH groups
Full size table

It was found that postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the LH than OH group (8.6 days vs. 11.6 days, p=0.009). However, hospital costs did not significantly differ between the two (7.7W RMB vs. 7.2W RMB, p=0.502). For both groups, no deaths were recorded within the first 30 days post-surgery.

Long-term outcomes

Comparisons of long-term outcomes between the OH and LH groups are shown in Table 3 and Figs. 1 and 2. It was found that a higher proportion of patients relapsed (59.0 %) and died (46.2 %) in the OH group as compared with that in the LH group (37.9 % and 31.5 %, respectively). However, it was evident that the differences of relapse and death in the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In patients who relapsed, the hepatic and extrahepatic recurrence (52.2% and 54.5%) was the main site of relapse in both groups, followed by hepatic recurrence (32.6% and 36.4%). The total number of patients who received treatment following recurrence are 41 and 9 patients in two groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Among the patients with recurrence in the two group, 4 patients (8.7%) and 2 patients (18.2%) received radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 11 patients (23.9%) and 2 patients (18.2%) received repeated liver resection, 19 patients (41.3%) and 3 patients (27.3%) received oncologic palliative therapy, 3 patients (6.5%) and 0 patients (0.0%) received repeated liver resection and oncologic palliative therapy, and 4 patients (8.7%) and 2 patients (18.2%) received RFA and oncologic palliative therapy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of overall survival between the two groups

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of disease-free survival between the two groups

Full size image

The mean follow-up time was similar between the OH group and LH group (17.2±16.4 vs. 13.3±12.3, p = 0.254). The median OS and DFS for the OH group were 20.5 and 13.0 months, respectively, whereas for the LH group was 27.1 and 18.9 months, respectively (Figs. 1 and 2). These differences between the two groups were also not statistically significant (p = 0.53 and p = 0.35, respectively).

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS and DFS

Results of univariate and multivariate analyses of variables for OS and DFS are summarized in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. CA-19-9, BMI, neutrophil count, TNM stage, platelet count, AST, pathological differentiation, lymphatic metastasis, satellite foci, and liver capsule invasion were independent prognostic factors for OS (p<0.05), and CA-19-9 (HR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.003, p=0.000) and moderate differentiation (HR 0.344, 95% CI 0.159–0.744 p=0.007) were independent risk factors for OS. CA-19-9, TNM stage, neutrophil count, pathological differentiation, lymphatic metastasis, and liver capsule invasion were independent prognostic factors for DFS (p<0.05), and CA-19-9 (HR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000–1.002, p=0.006) and neutrophil count (HR 1.326, 95% CI 1.128–1.558, p=0.001) were independent risk factors for DFS.

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall survival rates
Full size table
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with disease-free survival rates
Full size table

Discussion

ICC is the second most common primary malignant hepatic tumor [11] and most remain undiagnosed at early stages due to lack of typical distinct symptoms and have poor prognoses [3, 6]. The same phenomenon was observed in our study, where patients with relapse had a high mortality rate in both groups (36/46 and 9/11, respectively). Moreover, these tumors remain most neglected in the patients aged 60 and older, due to low awareness of the illness.

Surgical resection, especially R0, is the main treatment for ICC patients despite its considerable risk of recurrence [3, 6, 7]. In this study, most patients in both groups had R0 resection, indicating that laparoscopic surgery was now relatively feasible for ICC treatment. Rather than only in our research, many research centers had demonstrated the same attitude [12,13,14,15]. Relatedly, LH, when compared to OH for ICC treatment, had a higher R0 resection, more favorable short-term outcomes and lower LND rates [8, 9, 14, 15]. Furthermore, it was found that the LND rates in this study were lower in the LH as compared with the rates in OH group (Table 3), but the differences were not statistically significant.

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) had been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in ICC [16], and the controversy of lymph node dissection for ICC had been attracting great attention in recent years. Advocates of routine LND in ICC patients suggest that LND not only prolongs OS and DFS but also allows for accurate lymph node staging, which can help in determining the patient’s prognosis and developing subsequent adjuvant treatment plans [17, 18]. While opponents argue that LND fails to improve OS or DFS in such patients and was responsible for the increased risk of postoperative complications [19]. Therefore, we performed the cox regression analysis to explore the clinical significance of LND in our experiments. The results revealed that both LND and the number of LND may not be an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. This may suggest that LND does not affect the prognosis and outcome in patients aged 60 and older with ICC.

Mean tumor diameters were larger in the OH than LH group, but this difference was not statistically significant. This difference may be because, logically and ethically, conventional open surgery was recommended for patients with large tumors. However, the rate of major hepatectomy via laparoscopic in LH group is comparable to OH group in our research center, which benefitted greatly from advances in laparoscopic instruments and techniques and indicated that laparoscopic major hepatectomy is also can performed. The significant differences in incision length and the duration of postoperative stays between the two groups (Table 3) corroborated previous studies [8, 12]. An advantage of shorter incision lengths in LH when compared to OH is prevention of possible complications and pain reduction. Indeed, the LH group had a zero incidence of incision-related complications. Postoperative infection, particularly lung infection in elderly patients, is an increasingly common clinical complication [20,21,22]. It is evident that no significant distinction was indicated in antibiotic usage. In this case, the rates of lung and intraperitoneal infections were lower in the LH than OH group. Therefore, a worthwhile research study would be to explore how laparoscopic surgery can be used to reduce postoperative infections in the elderly.

Owing to the dismal prognosis of ICC, it is urgent to find prognostic indicators to improve the prognosis. Perioperative level of Alb is reported as a possible independent prognostic factor for ICC [23,24,25]. In our present study, the preoperative levels of Alb significantly differed between the two groups (Table 1). However, we tentatively suggest that Alb played little role for the long-term outcomes in the study. There are two explanations. First, mean Alb levels for both groups not only slightly differed but also were over the lower limit of normal (Table 1). Second, a substantial proportion of patients lacked sufficient c-reactive protein (CRP) levels; thus, CRP/Alb ratios could not be calculated [24,25,26]. The total bilirubin level (TBIL) is a significant index of liver function [27,28,29,30], and thus, TBIL was monitored and high TBIL was promptly treated. Additionally, TBIL was an important independent prognosis predictor for ICC patients [31,32,33] and was significantly higher in the OH than LH group on the first postoperative blood tests (Table 3). However, TBIL did not differ between the two before operations, further demonstrating laparoscopic in lieu of open surgery as a means to prevent high TBIL. Body mass index (BMI), which is calculated from weight and height, is highly correlated with obesity. Obesity is a major concern that is correlated with increasing risks of cancers, including ICC [34, 35]. Likewise, the BMI is also known to be associated with the prognosis of ICC [36]. In the present study, we demonstrated that BMI was an independent prognostic factor for ICC (Tables 4). The ratio of the neutrophil count and other inflammatory biomarkers can predicate the prognosis of an ICC patient [37, 38]. Neutrophil count also affect prognoses and we also demonstrated this (Tables 4 and 5). The understanding of those risk factors and protective factors associated with prognosis is important to guide future interventions directed at improving long-term prognosis for of patients with ICC.

Research on treatments that ensure long-term survival of patients is high relevant for clinical cancer. Today, surgery-based comprehensive therapy combined with chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy is the recommended basic route. In terms of surgery-based comprehensive therapy, this study demonstrated that ICC patients who underwent LH achieved long-term outcomes comparable to those of patients who underwent OH, and this corroborated previous studies [8, 12, 13]. Taken together, LH was a safe and feasible alternative treatment for ICC patients aged 60 and older, which achieved short and long-term outcomes that were comparable and even superior to those of OH.

There are two limitations in the study should be point out. Firstly, it was a retrospective analysis. Second, it had a small sample size (n=107) due to insufficient medical records for a large proportion of patients who were from other research centers. The latter especially limited the study as the robustness of the employed methods increases with the amount of systematic information and sample size.

Conclusion

In conclusion, LH was safe, reliable, and feasible for the treatment of ICC patients aged 60 and older. We also found that the rate of major hepatectomy and LND in the LH group can achieve the same effects as the OH group. Furthermore, patients in the LH group had better short-term clinical outcomes as compared with that in OH whereas the long-term prognoses of patients in the two group were statistically comparable to each other.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ICC:

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

LH:

Laparoscopic hepatectomy

OH:

Open hepatectomy

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

RFA:

Radiofrequency ablation

ICU:

Intensive care unit

BMI:

Body mass index

TBIL:

Total bilirubin level

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

OS:

Overall survival

DFS:

Disease-free survival

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

LND:

Lymph node dissection

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xia T, Li K, Niu N, Shao Y, Ding D, Thomas DL, et al. Immune cell atlas of cholangiocarcinomas reveals distinct tumor microenvironments and associated prognoses. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elvevi A, Laffusa A, Scaravaglio M, Rossi RE, Longarini R, Stagno AM, et al. Clinical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an updated comprehensive review. Ann Hepatol. 2022;27:100737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu M, Liu BL, Liu B, Guo L, Wang Q, Song YQ, et al. Cutaneous metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3066–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Massironi S, Pilla L, Elvevi A, Longarini R, Rossi RE, Bidoli P, et al. New and Emerging Systemic Therapeutic Options for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Cells. 2020;9(3):688.

  7. Gunasekaran G, Bekki Y, Lourdusamy V, Schwartz M. Surgical treatments of hepatobiliary cancers. Hepatology. 2021;73(Suppl 1):128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Regmi P, Hu HJ, Paudyal P, Liu F, Ma WJ, Yin CH, et al. Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:979–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Machairas N, Kostakis ID, Schizas D, Kykalos S, Nikiteas N, Sotiropoulos GC. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Updat Surg. 2021;73:59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel S, Lutz JM, Panchagnula U, Bansal S. Anesthesia and perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients - a clinical review (Part 1). J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28:162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banales JM, Marin J, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:557–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu J, Han J, Zhang Y, Liang L, Zhao J, Han F, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Biosci Trends. 2020;14:376–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang SH, Choi Y, Lee W, Ahn S, Cho JY, Yoon YS, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 3-year outcomes of a cohort study with propensity score matching. Surg Oncol. 2020;33:63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerrini GP, Esposito G, Tarantino G, Serra V, Olivieri T, Catellani B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the first meta-analysis. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2020;405:265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anselmo A, Siragusa L, Pisani G, Materazzo M, Pirozzi B, Tisone G. Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocellular Carcinoma: An Adequate Lymphadenectomy is Also Possible in Artery Variation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11549-6.

  16. Umeda Y, Mitsuhashi T, Kojima T, Satoh D, Sui K, Endo Y, et al. Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29:217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang F, Wu C, Bo Z, Xu J, Yi B, Li J, et al. The clinical value of regional lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:376–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ke Q, Wang L, Lin Z, Lou J, Zheng S, Bi X, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with clinically negative lymph node metastasis: a multi-center study from China. Front Oncol. 2021;11:585808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu Y, Song J, Xu X, Tan Y, Yang J. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with large or multiple intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: a propensity score based case-matched analysis from a single institute. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e18307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Liu X, Chen J. Risk factors of enterostomy infection caused by bacterial infection through mathematical modelling-based information data analysis. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:4634659.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Panagiotakis GI, Andreou AG, Petrakis IE, Tzardi M, Daskalogiannaki M, Chalkiadakis GE. Laparoscopic resection of a sigmoid colon lipoma in a young female patient: a case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:1303–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spoto S, Valeriani E, Caputo D, Cella E, Fogolari M, Pesce E, et al. The role of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of bacterial infection after major abdominal surgery: advantage from daily measurement. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e9496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao J, Chen Y, Wang J, Wang J, Wang Y, Chai S, et al. Preoperative risk grade predicts the long-term prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Surg. 2021;21:113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakao Y, Yamashita YI, Arima K, Miyata T, Itoyama R, Yusa T, et al. Clinical usefulness of perioperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective single institutional study. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:2641–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kano H, Midorikawa Y, Song P, Nakayama H, Moriguchi M, Higaki T, et al. High C-reactive protein/albumin ratio associated with reduced survival due to advanced stage of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Biosci Trends. 2020;14:304–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ito T, Shinkawa H, Takemura S, Tanaka S, Nishioka T, Miyazaki T, et al. Impact of the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the long-term outcomes of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21:2373–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rivadeneyra-Domínguez E, Pérez-Pérez JE, Vázquez-Luna A, Díaz-Sobac R, Rodríguez-Landa JF. Effects of Cassava Juice (Manihot esculenta Crantz) on Renal and Hepatic Function and Motor Impairments in Male Rats. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(11):708.

  28. Hamoud AR, Weaver L, Stec DE, Hinds TD Jr. Bilirubin in the liver-gut signaling axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:140–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma K, Zajc I, Žiberna L. Dietary vitamin D equilibrium in serum ameliorates direct bilirubin associated diabetes mellitus. Chem Biol Interact. 2021;337:109399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaestner F, Seiler F, Rapp D, Eckert E, Müller J, Metz C, et al. Exposure of patients to di(2-ethylhexy)phthalate (DEHP) and its metabolite MEHP during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0224931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Singal AG, Rakoski MO, Salgia R, Pelletier S, Welling TH, Fontana RJ, et al. The clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:625–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaneko S, Kurosaki M, Tsuchiya K, Yasui Y, Inada K, Kirino S, et al. Prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma stratified by albumin-bilirubin grade. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:902–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsilimigras DI, Hyer JM, Moris D, Sahara K, Bagante F, Guglielmi A, et al. Prognostic utility of albumin-bilirubin grade for short- and long-term outcomes following hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis of 706 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:206–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:288–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tyson GL, El-Serag HB. Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2011;54:173–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Merath K, Mehta R, Hyer JM, Bagante F, Sahara K, Alexandrescu S, et al. Impact of body mass index on tumor recurrence among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma- a multi-institutional international analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1084–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohira M, Yoshizumi T, Yugawa K, Kosai-Fujimoto Y, Inokuchi S, Motomura T, et al. Association of inflammatory biomarkers with long-term outcomes after curative surgery for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2020;50:379–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin G, Liu Y, Li S, Mao Y, Wang J, Shuang Z, et al. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:50963–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Project of Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center of National Health Commission.

Funding

This study was funding by the Project of Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center of National Health Commission (China) in 2021 (GWJJ2021100302).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jianlei Wang and Wei Wang contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Operative Surgery, Integration and Practice Center, Cheeloo College Department of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China

    Jianlei Wang & Wei Wang

  2. Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China

    Jianlei Wang, Delin Ma, Tong Xia & Zhaochen Jiang

  3. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China

    Xiaolei Chen

  4. Department of Organ Transplantation, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China

    Gang Du & Bin Jin

Authors
  1. Jianlei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaolei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Delin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gang Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tong Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhaochen Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bin Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jianlei Wang and Wei Wang conceptualized and designed the study. Xiaolei Chen and Delin Ma collected the data and performed the analysis. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. Gang Du, Tong Xia, and Tingxiao Zhang drafted the initial version of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed many revisions of the manuscript and contributed important intellectual content. Bin Jin had full access to all the data in the study and had responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analyses. And the final, all the authors reviewed the manuscript and decided to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Jin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University (approval number: KYLL-202011-180).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wang, W., Chen, X. et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients aged 60 and older: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Onc 20, 396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02870-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02870-1

Keywords

  • Population aged 60 and older
  • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
  • Laparoscopic hepatectomy
  • Open hepatectomy
  • Prognosis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us