Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32.
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum N, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos S, Cho K, et al. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(1):64–84.
Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N, et al. Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(Suppl 4):72–83.
Costales A, Michener C, Escobar-Rodriguez PF. Radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2018;19:75.
Lee EJ, Kang H, Kim DH. A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical open hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156:83–6.
Nam J-H, Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, Kim Y-M, Kim Y-T. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:903–11.
Gallotta V, Conte C, Federico A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a case matched control study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(6):754–9.
Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, et al. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(6):994–1002.
Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q, Wan T, Liu J. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:990–8.
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1895–904.
Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1905–114.
Bertagnolli MM, DeCosse JJ. Laparoscopic colon resection for cancer-an unfavorable view. Adv Surg. 1996;29:155–64.
Kong TW, Chang SJ, Piao X, Paek J, Lee Y, Lee EJ, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival after open versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:77–86.
Balli JE, Franklin ME, Almeida JA, Glass JL, Diaz JA, Reymond M. How to prevent port-site metastases in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1034–6.
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, et al. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(9):1269–77.
Boyraz G, Karalok A, Basaran D, Turan T. Vaginal closure with EndoGIA to prevent tumor spillage in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(4):602.
Shiozaki A, Ichikawa D, Kosuga T, Marunaka Y, Otsuji E. Regulation of osmolality for cancer treatment. J Physiol Sci. 2017;67:353–60.
Li M, Hu M, Wang Y, Yang X. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;238:1–6.
Wang W, Chu HJ, Shang CL, Gong X, Liu TY, Zhao YH, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:1264–73.
Wang YZ, Deng L, Xu HC, Zhang Y, Liang ZQ. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:928.
Bogani G, Rossetti D, Ditto A, Martinelli F, Chiappa V, Leone C, et al. Minimally in vasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open surgery. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30:e27.
Wei XQ, Ma Y, Chen Y, Liu X, Zhao M, Zhou LW. Laparoscopic surgery for early cervical squamous cell carcinoma and its effect on the micrometastasis of cancer cells. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11921.
Kanao H, Matsuo K, Aoki Y, Tanigawa T, Nomura H, Okamoto S, et al. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30:e71.
O’Leary D, O’Leary E, Foley N, Cotter TG, Wang JH, Redmond HP. Effects of surgery on the cancer stem cell niche. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:319–25.
FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125:97–8.
Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Konishi I, Mikami M. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:87–93.
Canaz E, Ozyurek ES, Erdem B, Talmac MA, Ozaydin IY, Akbayir O, et al. Preoperatively assessable clinical and pathological risk factors for parametrial involvement in surgically treated FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:1722–8.
Margul DJ, Yang J, Seagle BL, Kocherginsky M, Shahabi S. Outcomes and costs of open, robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:5502.
Kim SI, Cho JH, Seol A, Im Kim Y, Lee M, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153:3–12.
Kim SI, Lee M, Lee S, Suh DH, Kim HS, Kim K, et al. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: a matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155:75–82.
Paik ES, Lim MC, Kim MH, Nie D, Li Z. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 1028). Gynecol Oncol. 2019;154:547–53.
Pedone Anchora L, Carbone V, Gallotta V, et al. Should the number of metastatic pelvic lymph nodes be integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer? Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1552.
Kim S, Min KJ, Lee S, Hong JH, Song JY, Lee JK, et al. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:174–80.
Liu Y, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, et al. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019;68:72–7.
Suh DH, Cho HY, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB. Matched-case comparisons in a single institution to determine critical points for inexperienced surgeons’ successful performances of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131170.