Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the patients

From: Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

Characteristic

ORH

MLRH

p-value

Total

336

302

 

Patients lost to follow-up (n)

15

11

 

Patients followed up with (n)

321

291

0.016

Age (y)

48.55 ± 8.51

46.92 ± 8.10

 

BMI (kg/m2)

23.39 ± 2.98

23.20 ± 3.15

0.442

Histological grading (%)

  

0.146

 G1

23 (7.2)

45 (15.5)

 

 G2

173 (53.9)

136 (46.7)

 

 G3

125 (38.9)

110 (37.8)

 

Pathological type (%)

  

0.700

 Squamous cell carcinoma

262 (81.6)

233 (80.1)

 

 Adenocarcinoma

55 (17.1)

52 (17.9)

 

 Adenosquamous carcinoma

4 (1.2)

6 (2.1)

 

FIGO stage (%)

  

< 0.001

 IB1

265 (82.6)

269 (92.4)

 

 IIA1

56 (17.4)

22 (7.6)

 

Tumor diameter (%)

  

0.079

 < 2 cm

87 (27.1)

98 (33.7)

 

 2~4 cm

234 (72.9)

193 (66.3)

 

Invasion depth (%)

  

0.001

 Inner 1/3

119 (37.1)

142 (48.8)

 

 Middle 1/3

116 (36.1)

97 (33.3)

 

 Deep 1/3

86 (26.8)

52 (17.9)

 

Vascular tumor embolus (%)

  

0.325

 Negative

243 (75.7)

230 (79.0)

 

 Positive

78 (24.3)

61 (21.0)

 

Lymph node metastasis (%)

  

0.143

 Negative

258 (80.4)

247 (84.9)

 

 Positive

63 (19.6)

44 (15.1)

 

Adjuvant therapy (%)

  

0.058

 None

163 (50.8)

179 (61.5)

 

 Radiotherapy

35 (10.9)

28 (9.6)

 

 Chemotherapy

22 (6.9)

14 (4.8)

 

 CCRT

101 (31.5)

70 (24.1)

 
  1. FIGO 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CCRT concurrent chemoradiation therapy, ORH open radical hysterectomy, MLRH modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy