Skip to main content

Advertisement

Thoracic tumor resection combined with SVC replacement using autologous pericardium

Abstract

Background

Invasion of the superior vena cava (SVC) by thoracic tumors and occurrence of SVC syndrome are often encountered in clinical practice; but the prognosis in these cases is poor. Replacement of the SVC with autologous pericardial tissue is rarely performed. In this study, we sought to investigate the postoperative outcomes of this rare procedure.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of six patients who underwent SVC replacement using autologous pericardial tissue between October 2010 and November 2016. We collected data on the patients’ pathological features, operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival.

Results

All six patients were male with an average age of 52 years (range, 18–62 years). Three of the patients had lung cancer, one had stage III thymoma, and two had germinoma. Four of the six patients had mild or moderate superior vena cava compression and no corresponding clinical symptoms. The other two patients had severe compression and obvious symptoms of SVC syndrome, with the typical swelling of the face, eyelids, and upper extremities. All six patients underwent complete tumor resection, with two of the lung cancer patients undergoing right lobectomy and one undergoing right pneumonectomy. With respect to the postoperative outcomes, one patient died, whereas the others did not develop any major complications. At the end of the follow-up period, five of the patients were alive and none of the patients had developed thrombosis in the grafts.

Conclusions

Our findings indicated that SVC replacement with autologous pericardium is technically feasible and safe, with few postoperative complications and favorable long-term effects. Although it has some limitations, this method appears to be useful in achieving SVC reconstruction of moderate size. SVC replacement with autologous pericardium appears to have the potential for widespread clinical use.

Introduction

Locally advanced lung or mediastinal tumors sometimes invade the superior vena cava (SVC), and surgery for such invasive lesions is still controversial because of the poor prognosis [1, 2]. Locally advanced lung or primary mediastinal malignancies are the most common causes of SVC syndrome, accounting for 60% of the cases [3]. However, improved surgical techniques and neoadjuvant therapy have made it possible to eliminate the clinical symptoms as well as achieve favorable immediate and long-term outcomes [2, 4].

Surgical treatment for the management of lung cancer or mediastinal malignancy invading the SVC involves the replacement of the SVC. The use of autologous tissue, particularly the pericardium, is less common and challenging in a clinical setting, especially when performed by surgeons who lack relevant experience [5]. Cases of SVC replacement in which the use of autologous pericardium is being considered need to be carefully evaluated for the applicability of the biological graft, survival status, and risk of complications after surgery. As early as 1973, Miller et al. [6] have shown that SVC replacement could be successfully performed in dogs by using an autologous pericardium. Subsequently, in 1990, Piccione et al. [7] reported the first successful SVC replacement using an autologous pericardium in humans.

Although successful SVC replacement with an autologous pericardium has been reported in a few cases, the application of this technique in actual practice still remains limited. In this study, we examine in detail the process of pericardial replacement of the SVC and summarize the advantages and long-term results of this procedure.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

This investigation was designed as a retrospective study of the data of patients who underwent SVC replacement with an autologous pericardium at the Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, between October 2010 and November 2016. Three of these patients had lung cancer, one had thymoma, and two had germinomas. We analyzed the data of the patients to evaluate their clinical characteristics, pathological features, type of surgery, postoperative outcomes, and long-term survival rates. In addition, we assessed their imaging findings; representative images obtained from 2 of the 6 patients are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Tumors invading SVC on chest CT. a Right hilus pulmonis Sq.in patient 2. b Dysgerminoma in patient 3. c Right hilus pulmonis Sq.in patient 4. d Right upper lobe Sq.in patient 5. e Type AB thymoma in patient 6. SVC superior vena cava, Sq. squamous cell carcinoma, CT computed tomography

Reconstruction process (two methods)

No invasion of the confluence in the left and right brachial veins

In the patient who underwent SVC reconstruction for a thymoma, we performed a median sternotomy with an incision in the right first intercostal space. For the three lung cancer patients, a right posterolateral incision was taken on the fifth intercostal space. The arteries, veins, and bronchi of the lungs were prepared routinely, and the lung tissues were removed. The azygos vein was ligated and severed, with proximal and distal clamping of the SVC. We then resected the tumor-invaded portion of the SVC. Depending on the extent of the SVC resected, an appropriate length of the pericardium was obtained, from the precordial region. A 5-0 prolene suture line was used for the continuous eversion suturing of the two edges of the pericardium to form a tubular pericardium (Fig. 2). The inner and outer surfaces of the pericardial tube thus prepared were washed repeatedly with 1:1000 heparin saline. By placing additional continuous eversion sutures with the 5–0 prolene line, the two ends of the pericardial tube were anastomosed to the ligated distal and proximal ends of the SVC, taking care to eliminate any torsion. The lumen of the tube thus created was washed repeatedly with heparin saline, after checking for any kinks or trapped gas within (Fig. 3). The blockage of the SVC was removed, and filling of the pericardial tube was closely observed to rule out any bleeding through the anastomoses. The initial steps of reconstruction are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 2
figure2

a Suitable size of autologous pericardium obtained and repeatedly washed with heparin saline. b The autogenous pericardium sutured to form a tubular pericardium

Fig. 3
figure3

Reconstruction of the superior vena cava with a tube of autologous pericardial (white arrow)

Fig. 4
figure4

a Tumor invading the SVC, but not reaching the confluence of the right and left brachiocephalic veins. b SVC severed at the upper and lower ends of the tumor. c Autologous pericardial tube anastomosed to the distal and proximal ends of the SVC

Invasion of the upper left and right brachial vein junctions

Two of the enrolled patients underwent surgery for germinoma. In these patients, we performed median sternotomy in combination with an incision in the right first intercostal space. Further, the distal and proximal ends of the azygos vein and right brachiocephalic vein were clamped and then severed. The graft obtained was flushed with heparin saline, and proximal ligation of the right brachiocephalic veins and distal ligation of the azygos vein were performed. By using a 5-0 prolene suture line, the distal end of the right brachiocephalic vein was anastomosed with the proximal end of the azygous vein by serial sutures. Then, the two veins were declamped, and the blood flow in the anastomosis was checked to ensure that it was smooth and that there was no bleeding. A portion of the pericardium was resected from the precordial region, according to the required size, and the two edges of the pericardium were approximated to form a tubular pericardium by continuous eversion suture using a 5-0 prolene line. The inner and outer surfaces of the pericardial tube were repeatedly washed with 1:1000 heparin saline. The left brachiocephalic vein was blocked and cut-off, followed by flushing of the section with heparin saline. One end of the pericardial tube was anastomosed to the distal end of the left brachiocephalic vein using a 5-0 consecutive prolene suture line. The SVC was then clipped and severed at a distance of ≥ 2 cm from the base of the tumor. The other end of the pericardial tube was anastomosed to the proximal end of the SVC, taking care to avoid any torsion. Finally, the lumen of the prepared tube was repeatedly washed with heparin saline, after checking for any trapped gas and kinking. The blockage of the SVC was then released, and the pericardial tube filling was checked to ensure that there was no bleeding from the anastomosis. The procedure of this reconstruction process is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure5

d The tumor invaded the SVC and reach the confluence of the right and left brachiocephalic veins. e Severed right and left brachiocephalic veins, distal end of the azygos vein, and the SVC at a distance of ≥ 2 cm from the base of the tumor. f Right brachiocephalic vein and azygos vein proximal anastomosis: The two orifices of the pericardial tube anastomosed proximally to the SVC and distally to the left brachial vein

Postoperative management

After the operation, patients were administered short-term intravenous anticoagulants (infusion of heparin 8000 U plus normal saline 500 mL/day). Routine thoracic spiral computed tomography (CT) and 3D reconstruction was performed for all patients, to assess the patency of the graft after surgery. Procedure-related mortality was defined as death occurring within 30 days of the surgery or within the first 30 days of the initial postoperative hospitalization period. Survival was defined as the time from surgery to death or the last follow-up.

Results

Clinical and pathological characteristics

In our study, 2 of the 6 patients had developed manifestations of SVC syndrome before surgery, with the typical swelling of the face, eyelids, and upper extremities. After the surgery, symptoms had significantly reduced (Fig. 6). One of the enrolled patients underwent preoperative chemotherapy, whereas the others underwent postoperative chemotherapy and a stable disease (SD) was achieved in these patients, with no recurrence. At the time of presentation, the patients had varying degrees of SVC invasion of the tumors. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the six patients are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 6
figure6

a Severe symptomatic superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome in a 57-year-old patient (#4). b Photograph of the patient 10 days after the SVC replacement with autologous pericardial; postoperative symptoms were significantly reduced. The clinical result is excellent 7 years after the operation

Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of six patients

Surgical features

Intravenous sodium heparin (0.5 mg/kg) was administered before the clamping of the SVC. In five of the six cases, SVC reconstruction was performed using the SVC clamp technique; the average duration of SVC clamping in these cases was 77 min. In the remaining case, clamping was performed for 20 min combined with a venovenous shunt creation. The average operative time was 420 min, and the average volume of blood loss during the operation was 1050 mL. The amount of intraoperative blood transfusion required for the patients was different for different patients. Complete resection was performed for all patients with no instances of intraoperative death. The operative data for the six patients is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Operative characteristics of six patients

Immediate and long-term outcomes after surgery

The average length of hospital stay for five of our patients was 25 days. The average duration of postoperative anticoagulation was 10 days (range, 8–17 days). Postoperative thoracic spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3D reconstruction was performed in all cases, and uninterrupted flow and adequate filling of the SVC were noted in all cases (Fig. 7). The average follow-up duration was 55 months (range, 17–90 months), with only minor (non-life-threatening) postoperative complications and no serious complications. At the end of the follow-up period, five patients had survived. The sixth patient underwent right pneumonectomy and carinal reconstruction; on the first postoperative day, the patient developed respiratory failure and tracheotomy was performed immediately. However, it was ineffective and the patient was declared dead. Thus, the main cause of death in this patient was unrelated to the SVC reconstruction. The details of the immediate and long-term outcomes of surgery for all the six patients are provided in Table 3.

Fig. 7
figure7

a and b Postoperative thoracic spiral computed tomography (CT) plus 3D reconstruction showing unobstructed, reconstructed SVC with adequate filling (white arrow). c CT venogram showing adequate postoperative filling of reconstructed SVC (white arrow)

Table 3 Immediate and long-term outcomes after surgery in six patients

Discussion

For patients with malignant thoracic tumors that invade the SVC, treatment options such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, resection of the SVC lesion, and bypass shunts [8, 9] have not proven to be sufficiently effective. Therefore, reconstruction of the SVC is the most important aspect of treatment in such cases. However, drawbacks of the surgical techniques and the high rate of rejection of transplant materials have resulted in postoperative mortality rates as high as 4.5–14% [2, 10, 11]. Nevertheless, some reports have been published on the successful reconstruction of the SVC with further improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management [12,13,14,15].

Currently, the most common grafts used in SVC reconstruction are polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Gore-Tex® synthetic prostheses and heterologous (bovine) custom-made pericardial prostheses [16,17,18]. Autologous pericardium grafts are currently rather unpopular, mainly because their preparation is difficult and time-consuming [19]. PTFE prosthesis offers the advantage of “rings,” which prevent graft collapse when the central venous pressure becomes negative [10]. However, it also has some disadvantages, mainly postoperative complications such as severe transplant rejection, early graft thrombosis, and high risk of infection. To prevent these complications, patients are required to take long-term anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapies.

With respect to the use of the bovine pericardial tissue, the main advantages are the lack of limitation in the length of the graft and lower risk of pericardial infection and thrombosis as compared to PTFE. However, Ciccone et al. [20] recommended the administration of continuous anticoagulant therapy for 6 months after surgery when bovine pericardium grafts are used. This is because bovine pericardium is heterogeneous and rejection at different levels of severity may still occur, which would increase the overall cost of the graft when compared with an autologous pericardium graft. Thus far, no reports have indicated the application of bovine pericardial tubes in SVC reconstruction [21]. Therefore, the safety and long-term effects of bovine pericardial tubes are still controversial.

One of the most important advantages of SVC reconstruction using an autologous pericardium is the material. Since this is an autologous tissue, the risk of antigenicity of other materials and rejection are completely eliminated. Furthermore, soon after implantation, the graft is re-epithelized with autogenous epithelial cells in humans, and it is associated with a low risk of infection, reduced platelet deposition, and less thrombogenicity on the flow surface. Thus, patients treated with this method do not require long-term, postoperative anticoagulant therapy.

The optimal duration for short-term anticoagulant therapy has not yet been established [22]. In our study, all 6 patients were empirically administered anticoagulant drugs for an average of 10 days, which greatly reduced the total duration of anticoagulation and significantly improved the patients’ quality of life. Because the length of the autologous pericardium is limited, it is suitable for SVC reconstruction when a moderate graft length is required.

In this paper, we describe, in detail, two surgical procedures for SVC replacement with an autologous pericardium. These procedures were useful in successfully creating unobstructed SVC grafts, without any serious postoperative complications. One of our patients was scheduled for right pneumonectomy and carinal reconstruction, which led to death during hospitalization. Spaggiari et al. suggest that pneumonectomy with complete resection of the SVC and reconstruction increases the risk of mortality in patients [11]. It must be emphasized that the mortality in our study group was due to pneumonectomy and oncological reasons and was not related to the SVC replacement with the autologous pericardium.

This study has a few limitations. The sample size is too small and larger-scale studies are necessary. Further, in the case of the pericardium, there is a limit to the size that can be utilized. This is a drawback of the replacement surgery. Nevertheless, the main purpose of this study was to propose an innovative surgical technique process, and this surgical technique has some obvious advantages and value.

Conclusions

To conclude, we found that the use of other methods for SVC replacement could lead to serious postoperative complications, such as severe rejection. The choice of autologous pericardium would preclude some of these serious complications. We found that among the 6 patients included in this study, 5 had relatively few postoperative complications, which implies that there is still some predictability in the safety of the surgery. This study at least proves that it is feasible to use the autologous pericardium for the operation, and only interception of the pericardium makes it complex. There is a degree of predictability in terms of safety and efficacy with this method, and the replacement of the SVC with autologous pericardium seems to have broad clinical application potential.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Martini N, Yellin A, Ginsberg RJ, Bains MS, Burt ME, McCormack PM, Rusch VW. Management of non-small cell lung cancer with direct mediastinal involvement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:1447–51.

  2. 2.

    Shargall Y, de Perrot M, Keshavjee S, Darling G, Ginsberg R, Johnston M, Pierre A, Waddell TK. 15 years single center experience with surgical resection of the superior vena cava for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:357–63.

  3. 3.

    Kalra M, Sen I, Gloviczki P. Endovenous and operative treatment of superior vena cava syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98:321–35.

  4. 4.

    Peng ZM, Chen JH, Meng L, Du JJ, Wang L, Zhang L, Wang XH. Resection for lung cancer invading the superior vena cava. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44:402–4.

  5. 5.

    Dai W, Dong J, Zhang H, Yang X, Li Q. Superior vena cava replacement combined with venovenous shunt for lung cancer and thymoma: a case series. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:363–70.

  6. 6.

    Miller RE, Corneil NJ, Sullivan FJ. Replacement of superior vena cava with autogenous tissue. An experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973;15:474–82.

  7. 7.

    Piccione W Jr, Faber LP, Warren WH. Superior vena caval reconstruction using autologous pericardium. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:417–9.

  8. 8.

    Dhaliwal RS, Das D, Luthra S, Singh J, Mehta S, Singh H. Management of superior vena cava syndrome by internal jugular to femoral vein bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:310–2.

  9. 9.

    Panneton JM, Andrews JC, Hofer JM. Superior vena cava syndrome: relief with a modified saphenojugular bypass graft. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:360–3.

  10. 10.

    Picquet J, Blin V, Dussaussoy C, Jousset Y, Papon X, Enon B. Surgical reconstruction of the superior vena cava system: indications and results. Surgery. 2009;145:93–9.

  11. 11.

    Spaggiari L, Magdeleinat P, Kondo H, Thomas P, Leon ME, Rollet G, Regnard JF, Tsuchiya R, Pastorino U. Results of superior vena cava resection for lung cancer. Analysis of prognostic factors. Lung Cancer. 2004;44:339–46.

  12. 12.

    Jeanfaivre T, Pegis JD, Enon B, Tuchais E. Surgical vein reconstruction in patients with tumor invasiveness of the superior caval system. Retrospective study of 7 cases. J Chir (Paris). 1996;133:61–4.

  13. 13.

    Lee DS, Flores RM. Superior vena caval resection in lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24:441–7.

  14. 14.

    Venuta F, Rendina E, Furio Coloni G. Lung resections combined with vena cava replacement. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2017. 2017.

  15. 15.

    Garcia A, Flores RM. Surgical management of tumors invading the superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:2144–6.

  16. 16.

    Spaggiari L, Veronesi G, D'Aiuto M, Tosoni A. Superior vena cava reconstruction using heterologous pericardial tube after extended resection for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:649–51.

  17. 17.

    Zhang S, Liu X, Huang W, Li J. A programmed procedure of prosthetic reconstruction of the superior vena cava for thoracic tumors via median thoracotomy. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017;20:751–4.

  18. 18.

    Del Campo C, Love J, Bowes F. Prosthetic replacement of the superior vena cava with a custom-made pericardial graft: an experimental study. Can J Surg. 1992;35:305–9.

  19. 19.

    D'Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Venuta F, De Giacomo T, Coloni GF, Rendina EA. Glutaraldehyde preserved autologous pericardium for patch reconstruction of the pulmonary artery and superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:357–8.

  20. 20.

    Ciccone AM, Venuta F, D’Andrilli A, Andreetti C, Ibrahim M, De Giacomo T, Massullo D, Rendina EA. Long-term patency of the stapled bovine pericardial conduit for replacement of the superior vena cava. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1487–91 discussion 1491.

  21. 21.

    Spaggiari L, Galetta D, Veronesi G, Leo F, Gasparri R, Petrella F, Borri A, Pelosi G, Venturino M. Superior vena cava replacement for lung cancer using a heterologous (bovine) prosthesis: preliminary results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:490–1.

  22. 22.

    Dartevelle PG, Chapelier AR, Pastorino U, Corbi P, Lenot B, Cerrina J, Bavoux EA, Verley JM, Neveux JY. Long-term follow-up after prosthetic replacement of the superior vena cava combined with resection of mediastinal-pulmonary malignant tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:259–65.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81560403 to JianJun Tang) and the Jiangxi Provinces Program of the Preponderant Team Building in Science and Technology Innovation (no. 20161BCB24011).

Author information

Sicong Jiang and Hao Hu contributed equally to this work. Xi Liu, Lang Tang and Feng Jiang conceived of the study. All authors participated in the design of the study. Sicong Jiang collected the clinical data. Sicong Jiang and Hao Hu processed the data. Jianjun Tang, Xiaoliang Cheng performed the statistical analysis. Sicong Jiang helped to interpret the results. Sicong Jiang drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Jianjun Tang or Xiaoliang Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Cancer Hospital reviewed and approved the study protocol. Each participant provided signed informed consent prior to enrollment.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent was obtained from the patient’s guardians for publication of this manuscript and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, S., Hu, H., Guo, C. et al. Thoracic tumor resection combined with SVC replacement using autologous pericardium. World J Surg Onc 17, 227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1769-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Superior vena cava
  • Autologous pericardium
  • Thoracic tumor
  • Lung cancer
  • Resection
  • Postoperative