Open Access

Prediction of the preoperative chemoradiotherapy response for rectal cancer by peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets

  • Noriko Tada1,
  • Kazushige Kawai1Email author,
  • Nelson H Tsuno1, 2,
  • Soichiro Ishihara1,
  • Hironori Yamaguchi1,
  • Eiji Sunami1,
  • Joji Kitayama1,
  • Koji Oba3 and
  • Toshiaki Watanabe1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201513:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-014-0418-0

Received: 19 June 2014

Accepted: 23 December 2014

Published: 7 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become a standard procedure to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer prior to surgery, markers to predict the response to CRT have not been fully identified. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of response to CRT, especially focusing on peripheral blood leukocyte subsets.

Methods

A total of 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled and received CRT followed by curative resection. The numbers of each lymphocyte subset in peripheral blood pre- and post-CRT were analyzed using flow cytometry. According to the pathological response to CRT, patients were classified into high (Hi-R) and low (Lo-R) response groups.

Results

Hi-R cases had significantly higher numbers of pre-CRT lymphocytes (p = 0.018), T lymphocytes (p = 0.009) and helper T lymphocytes (Th lymphocytes, p = 0.015) compared to the Lo-R cases. With the receiver-operating characteristic curve for numbers of pre-CRT T lymphocytes, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.733, and the optimal cutoff value was 1196/μl, with 76.5% sensitivity, 67.8% specificity, 59.1% positive and 82.6% negative predictive values. The numbers of pre-CRT Th lymphocytes and cytotoxic lymphocytes were both independent predictors of the high CRT response in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In addition to the direct cytotoxicity of CRT, recent studies have demonstrated the induction of an immunological host response, which also contributed to the tumor regression induced by CRT. Our result suggested the potential role of circulating T lymphocytes in predicting the response to CRT in colorectal cancer patients.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Chemoradiotherapy T lymphocyte Peripheral blood

Background

In the recent years, combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Tumor downstaging with preoperative CRT increases the curative resection rate and lowers the local recurrence rate [1-3]. However, it is now evident that the preoperative CRT is not equally effective for all rectal cancer patients. Whereas some patients show an important regression with no detectable cancer cells in the primary tumor location or in lymph nodes in the surgical specimens, others have only a minimal response to CRT [4-6].

Although clinical factors such as gender, age or clinical TNM stage had little association with CRT response [7], many molecular predictors of tumor response to CRT have been determined, such as p53 [8], epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) [9,10], Ki-67 [11] and p21 [9]. We have also reported Ku70, Ku86, P16 and telomerase reverse transcriptase as promising biomarkers in predicting the radiosensitivity of rectal cancer [7,12,13]. Furthermore, we recently reported that the gene expression profiles of rectal cancer determined by DNA microarray analysis were correlated with the histological regression [14]. All these approaches are based on the idea that the chemoradiosensitivity of rectal cancer is closely associated with the direct cytotoxic effect of radiation by inducing DNA damage or apoptosis of cancer cells. However, growing evidence indicates the possibility that the tumor shrinkage of rectal cancer depends not only on the radiocytotoxity to cancer cells, but also on the tumor microenvironment and host immune response [15,16]. Recently we reported that both the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and those circulating in peripheral blood strongly correlate with the response rate of CRT in retrospective studies [17-19] and demonstrated the involvement of antitumor immunity in the cancer regression process induced by CRT.

In the present prospective study with new series of patients, we aimed to elucidate which subset of circulating lymphocytes most reflects the immune response evoked during CRT in patients with rectal cancer and analyze their predictive ability for the response to CRT.

Methods

Patients

A total of 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer of clinical T3-4 and M0 stage at the Department of Surgical Oncology, the University of Tokyo Hospital between January 2010 and June 2012 were prospectively enrolled in the study. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (Research ethics committee, Graduate school of medicine and Faculty of medicine, The University of Tokyo), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients enrolled in the study received a total dose of 50.4 Gy of radiation and concomitant 5-FU based chemotherapy, and they underwent standardized curative resection, following an interval of 6–8 weeks after CRT. Barium enema (BE) was performed before and after CRT, and the longitudinal dimension of the rectal tumor was measured on BE images before (A) and after (B) CRT. The reduction rate was calculated as (A-B)/A, as described by Suzuki et al. [20,21].

Pathological study

All of the resected specimens were examined pathologically, and the findings were recorded in accordance with the TMN classification. The histological regression of the primary rectal lesion in response to CRT was evaluated and classified as high or low, based on the amount of residual cancer according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma, i.e., cases in which more than two-thirds of the cancer had degraded, necrotized or disappeared were classified as cases of high histological regression (Hi-R), and those with less than two-thirds reduction were classified as low histological regression (Lo-R).

Blood sampling and analysis of leukocyte phenotypes

Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained before neoadjuvant CRT and 4–6 weeks after completion of CRT, prior to surgery. Samples were collected in ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid collection tubes, and the blood cell counts in the samples were analyzed using an automated hematology analyzer (XE-5000, Sysmex, Japan). Lymphocyte subsets were also analyzed using flow cytometry, as described previously, with small modifications [22]. Briefly, whole blood was treated with FACS Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson) to lyse red cells and fix leukocytes with 1% formaldehyde. Then, leukocytes were incubated with 10 μl of each antibody for 20 min at room temperature and analyzed in the flow cytometer. The region of lymphocytes was gated, and two-color flow-cytometric analysis for each cell phenotype on 10,000 events was performed on the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) using the Multiset software package (Becton Dickinson), and the data were analyzed using the CellQuest software. A combination of isothiocyanate (FITC) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibody (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to identify lymphocyte subsets, as follows: CD3(+)/CD19(−) for the T lymphocytes, CD3(−)/CD19(+) for the B lymphocytes, CD3(+)/CD4(+) for the helper T lymphocytes (Th lymphocytes), CD3(+)/CD8(+) for the cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Tc lymphocytes) and CD3(−)/CD56(+) for the natural killer cells (Table 1).
Table 1

Definitions of lymphocyte subpopulations

Surface markers

Subpopulation

CD3 (+)/CD19 (-)

T lymphocytes

CD3 (-)/CD19 (+)

B lymphocytes

CD3 (+)/CD4 (+)

Helper T lymphocytes (Th lymphocytes)

CD3 (+)/CD8 (+)

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Tc lymphocytes)

CD3 (-)/CD56 (+)

Natural killer cells

Statistical analysis

The analysis of the associations between blood cell counts or numbers of lymphocyte subsets and clinicopathological variables was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U test. Association between the numbers of lymphocytes and tumor regression rate evaluated by barium enema was analyzed using the coefficient of correlation. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was used in analyzing the independency of the predictors for CRT response. All analyses were performed with JMP 9 software, and p-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 2. The 45 patients were divided into two groups according to the pathological response, i.e., Lo-R (28 cases, 62.2%) and Hi-R (17 cases, 37.8%), and the 8 cases of pathological CR were included in the Hi-R group. The correlation between the pre- or post-CRT number of leukocyte subpopulations and the pathological response is presented in Table 3. Cases of Hi-R had significantly higher numbers of pre-CRT lymphocytes compared to the Lo-R, whereas in the analysis of post-CRT peripheral blood leukocytes, any subpopulation of leukocytes correlated with the pathological response. Therefore, we focused on the pre-CRT lymphocyte subsets and analyzed their correlation with the response to CRT. As shown in Figure 1A, the number of T lymphocytes and Th lymphocytes in Hi-R group was markedly higher than that in the Lo-R group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.015, respectively). Although without statistical significance (p = 0.056), the number of Tc lymphocytes also showed the same tendency. As expected from the results of the blood cell count, no difference between the Lo-R and Hi-R groups was observed for any lymphocyte subsets post-CRT (Figure 1B). Similar results were obtained in the analysis of the correlation between the number of lymphocytes and tumor reduction rate evaluated by BE (Figure 2). The pre-CRT total number of T lymphocytes (Figure 2A) and Th lymphocytes (Figure 2B) significantly correlated with the tumor reduction rate (p = 0.049 and p = 0.042, respectively), whereas the pre-CRT number of Tc lymphocytes (Figure 2C) and post-CRT lymphocyte subsets (data not shown) showed no correlation. The higher the number of pre-CRT lymphocytes, the higher the tumor regression achieved was. Figure 3 represents the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for numbers of pre-CRT T lymphocytes, Th and Tc lymphocytes in predicting the pathological response in the Hi-Response group. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.733, 0.718 and 0.671, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of T lymphocytes was 1,196/μl, with 76.5% sensitivity, 67.8% specificity, 59.1% positive predictive value (PPV) and 82.6% negative predictive value (NPV). The cutoff value of Th lymphocytes was 683/μl, with 71.4% sensitivity, 76.5% specificity, 61.9% PPV and 83.3% NPV. The cutoff value of Tc lymphocytes was 367/μl, with 53.6% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, 53.6% PPV and 88.2% NPV. Based on these cutoff values, each lymphocyte subset was divided into two groups, namely lower and higher, and multivariate analysis of each factor in predicting CRT response was performed. As shown in Table 4, none of the pre-CRT clinical factors showed a correlation with the CRT response, whereas high pre-CRT Th and Tc lymphocytes were independent predictive factors of a good response to therapy.
Table 2

Patient characteristics ( n= 45)

Characteristics

 

Number of patients (%)

Gender

Male

29 (64.4)

 

Female

16 (35.6)

Age (years)

Median

64

 

Range

43 − 81

Ratio of tumor reduction (%)

 

43.7 ± 20.4*

Histological regression

Low regression (Lo-R)

28 (62.2)

 

High regression (Hi-R)

17 (37.8)

Depth of tumor

pT0-pT2

23 (51.1)

 

pT3-pT4

22 (48.9)

Lymph node metastasis

Absent

32 (71.1)

 

Present

13 (28.9)

Lymphatic invasion

Absent

38 (84.4)

 

Present

7 (15.6)

Venous invasion

Absent

19 (42.2)

 

Present

26 (57.8)

Histological classification

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

21 (46.7)

 

Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma

15 (33.3)

 

Mucinous carcinoma

1 (2.2)

 

No cancer remaining

8 (17.8)

Values are number (percentage) unless otherwise noted.

*Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

Table 3

The relations between the pathological response and subpopulations of leukocytes, pre- and post- CRT

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

Lo-R

Hi-R

P value

 

Lo-R

Hi-R

P value

White blood cells (cells/μl)

6,250 (2,800 − 9,400)

6,500 (3,700 − 9,600)

0.150

White blood cells (cells/μl)

4,700 (2,300 − 7,300)

4,300 (2,200 − 9,100)

0.598

Neutrophils (%)

65.9 (53.2 − 79)

60.2 (45.2 − 72.9)

0.106

Neutrophils (%)

71.1 (51 − 85.5)

70.1 (53 − 79.8)

0.543

Neutrophils (cells/μl)

4,211 (1,652 − 6,476)

4,250 (1,898 − 6,257)

0.743

Neutrophils (cells/μl)

3,334 (1,403 − 6,071)

2,994 (1,540– 6,379)

0.440

Lymphocytes (%)

25.9 (16.1 − 38.2)

31.5 (15.2 − 42.4)

0.261

Lymphocytes (%)

18.5 (5.5 − 33)

17 (10.9 − 36)

0.935

Lymphocytes (cells/μl)

1,510 (896 − 3,487)

1,998 (1,183 − 3,331)

0.018

Lymphocytes (cells/μl)

801 (391 − 1,351)

663 (386 − 2366)

0.743

Monocytes (%)

5.1 (3 − 10.7)

5.5 (3.8 − 9)

0.535

Monocytes (%)

6.9 (3 − 11)

7.1 (3.4 − 13)

0.752

Monocytes (cells/μl)

289 (168 − 696)

374 (185 − 801)

0.198

Monocytes (cells/μl)

278 (171 − 748)

309 (132 − 663)

0.717

Eosinophils (%)

1.5 (0 − 5.1)

3 (0.5 − 7.6)

0.040

Eosinophils (%)

2.0 (0 − 8.9)

2.9 (0.3 − 10)

0.079

Eosinophils (cells/μl)

86 (0 − 418)

177 (31 − 669)

0.010

Eosinophils (cells/μl)

84.2 (0 − 543)

112 (27.3 − 450)

0.147

Basophils (%)

0.2 (0 − 1.3)

0.4 (0 − 1.3)

0.277

Basophils (%)

0.3 (0 − 2)

0.2 (0 − 1)

0.307

Basophils (cells/μl)

16.5 (0 − 122)

23.2 (0 − 107)

0.167

Basophils (cells/μl)

12.9 (0− 94)

11.8 (0 − 61)

0.357

Figure 1

The correlation between the pathological response and number of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets before CRT. Filled bars represent numbers of cells of pre-CRT (A) and post-CRT (B) in the Lo-R group and blank bars in the Hi-R group. Data are expressed as mean + SD of results. *Statistical significance.

Figure 2

The numbers of lymphocyte subsets before CRT and tumor reduction ratio in response to CRT. The longitudinal length of the rectal tumor was measured by barium enema before and after CRT, and the tumor reduction ratio was calculated. Histological response grade was evaluated by the pathologists, according to the definitions in the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. The correlations between the numbers of T lymphocytes (A), Th lymphocytes (B) and Tc lymphocytes (C) and tumor reduction rate are presented. Correlations of coefficient are presented as r.

Figure 3

The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the numbers of pre-CRT T lymphocytes (A), Th lymphocytes (B) and Tc lymphocytes (C) in predicting the pathological high response group. The X-axis represents “1–sensitivity” and the Y-axis, the sensitivity. The areas under the curve for each ROC curve are shown.

Table 4

Multivariate analysis of clinical factors in predicting CRT response

  

Univariate

Multivariate

  

P value

Hazard ratio

95% CI

P value

Gender

Male vs. female

0.9758

   

Age

65 vs. >65

0.6547

   

Clinical T

T3 vs. T4

0.8847

   

Clinical N

N0 vs. N+

0.6547

   

T lymphocytes

1,196 vs. >1,196 (cells/μl)

0.0033

1.46

0.18 − 14.6

0.7261

Th lymphocytes

683 vs. >683 (cells/μl)

0.0015

10.56

1.5 − 99.6

0.0124

Tc lymphocytes

367 vs. >367 (cells/μl)

0.0032

11.38

1.5 − 146.4

0.0194

We evaluated the association between lymphocyte subsets and the clinicopathological variables of the resected specimens. However, as presented in Table 5, both pre- and post-CRT lymphocyte subsets showed almost no correlation with the clinicopathological factors. Although the post-CRT number of B lymphocytes was higher in males than females (p = 0.026), and the number of natural killer cells in both pre- and post-CRT was higher in the cases with venous invasion (p = 0.024 and p = 0.018, respectively), these subsets account for only a small proportion of lymphocytes; thus, the clinical impact of these findings remains to be elucidated. The reductions in the number of T lymphocytes, Th and Tc lymphocytes during CRT are also shown in Figure 4. A significantly higher reduction in the number of T, Th and Tc lymphocytes during CRT was observed in the T0-2 than in the T3/4 group (p = 0.022, p = 0.034 and p = 0.026, respectively).
Table 5

The correlations between the clinicopathological factors and numbers of lymphocyte subsets, pre- and post- CRT

Gender

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

Male

Female

P value

Male

Female

P value

T lymphocytes

1,196 (675 − 2,273)

1,046 (686 − 1,688)

0.325

608 (258 − 1,240)

455 (321 − 1,856)

0.228

Th lymphocytes

667 (329 − 1,489)

587 (383 − 1,180)

0.619

248 (89 − 696)

196 (118 − 692)

0.334

Tc lymphocytes

448 (258 − 855)

374 (200 − 847)

0.083

324 (119 − 671)

238 (137 − 1,144)

0.441

B lymphocytes

140 (31 − 675)

173 (30 − 409)

0.822

40 (1 − 185)

20 (9 − 73)

0.026

Natural killer cells

259 (56 − 966)

236 (135 − 1,020)

0.831

179 (15 − 811)

162 (35 − 497)

0.519

Depth of invasion

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

pT0-2

pT3/4

P value

pT0-2

pT3/4

P value

T lymphocytes

1,196 (732 − 2,217)

1,157 (675 − 2,273)

0.489

482 (258 − 1,010)

694 (268 − 1,856)

0.136

Th lymphocytes

683 (329 − 1,496)

513 (361 − 1,364)

0.525

215 (89 − 620)

276 (99 − 696)

0.120

Tc lymphocytes

458 (200 − 847)

394 (270 − 855)

0.658

268 (141 − 495)

348 (119 − 1,144)

0.182

B lymphocytes

172 (73 − 675)

143 (30 − 459)

0.594

31 (1 − 140)

24 (9 − 185)

0.619

Natural killer cells

221 (135 − 966)

268 (56 − 1,020)

0.586

167 (28 − 335)

179 (15 − 811)

0.261

Lymph node metastasis

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

Absent

Present

P value

Absent

Present

P value

T lymphocytes 1,135

(675 − 2,273) 1,233

(686 − 1,399)

0.507

494 (268 − 1,856)

628 (258 − 1,240)

0.332

Th lymphocytes

665 (329 − 1,496)

641 (383 − 907)

0.395

217 (99 − 696)

276 (89 − 564)

0.346

Tc lymphocytes

430 (258 − 855)

439 (200 − 752)

0.970

307 (119 − 1144)

316 (167 − 671)

0.324

B lymphocytes

178 (77 − 675)

122 (30 − 459)

0.089

26.5 (9 − 185)

30 (1 − 94)

0.769

Natural killer cells

260 (56 − 929)

232 (124 − 1,020)

0.590

173.5 (15 − 811)

174 (45 − 552)

0.837

Lymphatic invasion

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

Absent

Present

P value

Absent

Present

P value

T lymphocytes

1,181 (732 − 2,273)

895 (675 − 2,217)

0.247

494 (258 − 1,856) 694

(366 − 1,240)

0.136

Th lymphocytes

675 (329 − 1,364)

602 (361 − 1,496)

0.491

210 (89 − 696)

276 (226 − 564)

0.100

Tc lymphocytes

453 (258 − 855)

350 (200 − 694)

0.434

268 (137 − 1,144)

348 (119 − 671)

0.206

B lymphocytes

167 (30 − 675)

122 (33 − 185)

0.103

27 (1 − 185)

30 (10 − 70)

0.931

Natural killer cells

232 (56 − 1,020)

495 (135 − 929)

0.199

167 (28 − 811)

201 (15 − 552)

0.283

Venous invasion

Pre-CRT

Post-CRT

 

Absent

Present

P value

Absent

Present

P value

T lymphocytes

1,122 (675 − 2,273)

1,181 (686 − 2,217)

0.774

481 (328 − 1,200)

619 (258 − 1,856)

0.227

Th lymphocytes

722 (329 − 1,364)

607 (383 − 1,496)

0.505

224 (146 − 696)

265 (89 − 692)

0.896

Tc lymphocytes

371 (200 − 855)

464 (258 − 847)

0.228

233 (119 − 495)

321 (137 − 1,144)

0.112

B lymphocytes

193 (73 − 409)

137 (30 − 675)

0.370

29 (10 − 185)

25 (1 − 121)

0.520

Natural killer cells

210 (117 − 498)

314 (56 − 1,020)

0.024

132 (15 − 811)

201 (80 − 552)

0.018

Data are expressed as median (range).

Pre-CRT: measured before chemoradiation therapy; post-CRT: measured after chemoradiation therapy.

Figure 4

The correlations between the reductions in numbers of lymphocyte subsets during CRT and pathological T factor of the resected specimens. Shaded bars represent the reduction in numbers of each lymphocyte subset in the T0-2 cases and blank bars in the T3/4 cases. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of results. *Statistical significance.

Discussion

In recent years, CRT has become one of the standard therapeutic modalities for the treatment of rectal cancer. Although CRT for rectal cancer has been shown to reduce postoperative local recurrence, it is now evident that preoperative CRT is not equally effective for all rectal cancer patients. If tumor response could be predicted before surgery, CRT-related toxicity and expense could be avoided for patients with resistant tumors, and/or more aggressive preoperative regimens could be considered for those patients. Therefore, a number of trials have been conducted to identify a useful marker for the prediction of the response to CRT [7-14]. Although most of the biomarkers identified so far are factors related to the radio-resistance of cancer cells themselves, in recent years, it has been elucidated that the immunological host response is also essential for tumor regression in CRT. Experimental T cell elimination remarkably reduced the therapeutic efficacy of radiation in a mouse model [23], and we have previously demonstrated that the densities of CD4(+) and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were significantly associated with the histological grade after CRT, and the density of CD8(+) TIL was an independent prognostic factor for achieving CR after CRT [19]. Recently, we reported that a high pre-CRT lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood of rectal cancer patients was significantly associated with pathological response [18]. A similar result was also reported from Korea [24], but the subset of circulating lymphocytes mostly involved in the antitumor immunity evoked during CRT remains to be elucidated. Therefore, in this prospective study, we aimed to clarify whether circulating lymphocytes could reflect local immunological response and, if so, to identify the subset of lymphocytes mostly involved, which might be used as a potential predictor of the pathological CRT response.

Initially, we evaluated the association between peripheral blood leukocyte counts and the pathological response. Patients with high response showed a significantly higher pre-CRT number of circulating lymphocytes than those with low response, corroborating the results of previous reports [18,24]. Because the lymphocyte population assessed by the hematology analyzer contains several subsets, further analysis of lymphocyte subsets using flow cytometry was conducted. Pre-CRT circulating T lymphocytes and Th lymphocytes, but not B lymphocytes, showed a significant correlation with the pathological response and the tumor regression rate, and a high T lymphocyte or Th lymphocyte count correlated with a larger tumor reduction. Both T and B lymphocytes significantly decreased during CRT, and the post-CRT lymphocyte subsets did not differ between the high- and low-response groups. A number of precedent studies have documented the participation of T lymphocytes, but not B lymphocytes, in the radiation-induced antitumor immunity [16,25], and our present results were also concordant. The AUC of pre-CRT T lymphocytes in predicting the low-response group was as high as 0.733, and in multivariate analysis, the numbers of Th lymphocytes and Tc lymphocytes were independent predictors of response to CRT. Because the negative predictive values of each lymphocyte subset in predicting good response were higher than 80%, lymphocytes subsets should be a promising marker for the screening of CRT-resistant patients prior to CRT, thus avoiding unnecessary CRT. Some of the previously reported predictive factors of the CRT effect were based on the analysis of the surgically resected specimens; thus, their value as a predictive marker of CRT is low. For their analysis, biopsy specimens are necessary, which hold two problems: first, the findings obtained from post-CRT resected specimens may be affected by the CRT, not reflecting the primary nature of the tumor; second, the biopsy samples do not necessarily represent the whole cancer tissue because of the heterogeneity of cancer. In this respect, peripheral blood lymphocytes, which are easily obtained through the collection of a small amount of blood and represent the systemic immunologic condition, might have an advantage over these previously reported markers.

The correlation between lymphocytes in peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has not been fully investigated. Milne et al. have reported that the lymphocyte count in peripheral blood did not correlate with CD8 (+) or CD20 (+) TIL in patients with ovarian cancer, and both lymphocyte count and TIL significantly correlated with prognosis, but the correlations were independent of each other [26]. Therefore, the role of circulating lymphocytes in antitumor immunity remains to be clarified; however, a number of reports have documented the association of a high peripheral lymphocyte count and favorable prognosis in patients with various types of malignancies including uterine, cervix, breast and nasopharyngeal carcinoma [27,28]. Our prospective study advanced these precedent findings in raising the following issues. First, peripheral lymphocytes seem to play a crucial role not only in treatment-naïve cancer tissue, but also in the CRT-mediated systemic anticancer immunological response. Second, among the various lymphocyte subsets, T lymphocytes, especially Th lymphocytes, seem to play a central role in the immunological response.

We also evaluated the association between the clinicopathological factors and the pre- and post-CRT peripheral lymphocyte subset counts. Contrary to the analysis of pathological regression, neither pre- nor post-CRT lymphocyte subsets showed a correlation with the clinicopathological factors. Interestingly, in cases with pathological T0-2, i.e., those with tumor downstaging, the higher reduction of T lymphocytes and Tc lymphocytes was induced by CRT. We previously reported that in vitro radiation-induced apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocytes is correlated with histological regression of preoperative CRT [29], and the present finding of the correlation between the clinical reduction of lymphocytes induced by CRT and the downstaging of T factor strongly supports our previous finding.

Several problems, however, still remain to be addressed in our present study. Pathological regression strongly correlated with pre-CRT Th, but not Tc lymphocyte counts. In contrast, downstaging of the T factor correlated with post-CRT, but not with pre-CRT, Tc or Th lymphocyte counts. Cancer cells undergo apoptosis by the direct cytotoxic effect of radiation or chemotherapy, and consequently release cancer-specific antigens. These released antigens are phagocytized by antigen-presenting cells, such as macrophages or dendritic cells, resulting in induction of tumor-specific Th and Tc lymphocyte responses [30-32]. Furthermore, irradiated tissue releases various chemoattractant factors, such as CCL11 or CXCL16 [33,34], and promotes infiltration of lymphocytes into the cancer tissue. A more detailed role of peripheral Th and Tc lymphocytes in these processes should be clarified in further investigations. Another problem is that the observation period of this study was relatively short, and there were only a few patients with postoperative recurrence; thus, the effect of lymphocytes on prognosis is still unclear. Further investigation with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up period is desired.

Conclusions

Both systemic and local immunity may play important roles in antitumor immunity, and from our present data, the analysis of the systemic one may efficiently predict the response to neoadjuvant CRT. The circulating T lymphocyte and Th lymphocyte counts would be promising markers for the prediction of response to CRT.

Consent

Patient consent was obtained for the study presented in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CRT: 

Chemoradiotherapy

BE: 

Barium enema

Hi-R: 

High histological regression

Lo-R: 

Low histological regression

Th lymphocytes: 

Helper T lymphocytes

Tc lymphocytes: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mika Matsuhashi from the Department of Transfusion Medicine, The University of Tokyo hospital for the experimental assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo
(2)
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo
(3)
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo

References

  1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1114–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ortholan C, Francois E, Thomas O, Benchimol D, Baulieux J, Bosset JF, et al. Role of radiotherapy with surgery for T3 and resectable T4 rectal cancer: evidence from randomized trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:302–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biondo S, Navarro M, Marti-Rague J, Arriola E, Pares D, Del Rio C, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: influence on long-term results. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:472–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, Campos FG, Nadalin W, Kiss D, et al. Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1319–28. discussion 1328-1319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Willeke F, Horisberger K, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Wenz F, Leitner A, Hochhaus A, et al. A phase II study of capecitabine and irinotecan in combination with concurrent pelvic radiotherapy (CapIri-RT) as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:912–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Komuro Y, Watanabe T, Hosoi Y, Matsumoto Y, Nakagawa K, Tsuno N, et al. The expression pattern of Ku correlates with tumor radiosensitivity and disease free survival in patients with rectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:1199–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu CG, Tominaga O, Nagawa H, Nita ME, Masaki T, Ishimaru G, et al. Role of p53 and p21/WAF1 detection in patient selection for preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:68–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuremsky JG, Tepper JE, McLeod HL. Biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:673–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Marquardt F, Rodel F, Capalbo G, Weiss C, Rodel C. Molecular targeted treatment and radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009;185:371–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kikuchi M, Mikami T, Sato T, Tokuyama W, Araki K, Watanabe M, et al. High Ki67, Bax, and thymidylate synthase expression well correlates with response to chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers: proposal of a logistic model for prediction. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:116–23.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Komuro Y, Watanabe T, Tsurita G, Muto T, Nagawa H. Evaluating the combination of molecular prognostic factors in tumor radiosensitivity in rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:666–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Komuro Y, Watanabe T, Tsurita G, Muto T, Nagawa H. Expression pattern of telomerase reverse transcriptase in rectal carcinoma predicts tumor radiosensitivity, local recurrence and disease-free survival. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:985–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Watanabe T, Komuro Y, Kiyomatsu T, Kanazawa T, Kazama Y, Tanaka J, et al. Prediction of sensitivity of rectal cancer cells in response to preoperative radiotherapy by DNA microarray analysis of gene expression profiles. Cancer research. 2006;66:3370–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Systemic effects of local radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:718–26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Demaria S, Formenti SC. Role of T lymphocytes in tumor response to radiotherapy. Front in Oncol. 2012;2:95.Google Scholar
  17. Kitayama J, Yasuda K, Kawai K, Sunami E, Nagawa H. Circulating lymphocyte number has a positive association with tumor response in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:47.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitayama J, Yasuda K, Kawai K, Sunami E, Nagawa H. Circulating lymphocyte is an important determinant of the effectiveness of preoperative radiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:64.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yasuda K, Nirei T, Sunami E, Nagawa H, Kitayama J. Density of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes in biopsy samples can be a predictor of pathological response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:49.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Suzuki T, Sadahiro S, Fukasawa M, Ishikawa K, Kamijo A, Yasuda S, et al. Predictive factors of tumor shrinkage and histological regression in patients who received preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:740–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Maeda Y, Tanaka Y, Nakamura T, Saguchi T, et al. Predictors of tumor downsizing and regression with preoperative radiotherapy alone and with concomitant tegafur/uracil (UFT) for resectable advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1107–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawai K, Tsuno NH, Kitayama J, Okaji Y, Yazawa K, Asakage M, et al. Epigallocatechin gallate, the main component of tea polyphenol, binds to CD4 and interferes with gp120 binding. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:951–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone HB, Peters LJ, Milas L. Effect of host immune capability on radiocurability and subsequent transplantability of a murine fibrosarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979;63:1229–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Choi CH, Kim WD, Lee SJ, Park WY. Clinical predictive factors of pathologic tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2012;30:99–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma Y, Kepp O, Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, Aymeric L, Locher C, et al. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy: cryptic anticancer vaccines. Semin Immunol. 2010;22:113–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Milne K, Alexander C, Webb JR, Sun W, Dillon K, Kalloger SE, et al. Absolute lymphocyte count is associated with survival in ovarian cancer independent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Transl Med. 2012;10:33.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Riesco A. Five-year cancer cure: relation to total amount of peripheral lymphocytes and neutrophils. Cancer. 1970;25:135–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. He JR, Shen GP, Ren ZF, Qin H, Cui C, Zhang Y, et al. Pretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and lymphocytes as independent prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:1769–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ishihara S, Iinuma H, Fukushima Y, Akahane T, Horiuchi A, Shimada R, et al. Radiation-induced apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocytes is correlated with histological regression of rectal cancer in response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1192–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikitina EY, Gabrilovich DI. Combination of gamma-irradiation and dendritic cell administration induces a potent antitumor response in tumor-bearing mice: approach to treatment of advanced stage cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:825–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Barrio MM, Abes R, Colombo M, Pizzurro G, Boix C, Roberti MP, et al. Human macrophages and dendritic cells can equally present MART-1 antigen to CD8(+) T cells after phagocytosis of gamma-irradiated melanoma cells. PloS one. 2012;7:e40311.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta A, Probst HC, Vuong V, Landshammer A, Muth S, Yagita H, et al. Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells via dendritic cell activation. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189:558–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber MA, Kraut N, Addicks T, Peter RU. Cell-type-dependent induction of eotaxin and CCR3 by ionizing radiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269:546–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsumura S, Wang B, Kawashima N, Braunstein S, Badura M, Cameron TO, et al. Radiation-induced CXCL16 release by breast cancer cells attracts effector T cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:3099–107.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tada et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement