Skip to main content

TREM-1 as a potential prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma



The tumor immune microenvironment plays a crucial role in the efficacy of various therapeutics. However, their correlation is not yet completely understood in Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aimed to investigate the potential of TREM-1 as a potential novel biomarker for ccRCC.


We constructed a ccRCC immune prognostic signature. The clinical characteristics, the status of the tumor microenvironment, and immune infiltration were analyzed through the ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms for the hub gene, while the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and PPI analysis were performed to predict the function of the hub gene. Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of TREM-1 in renal clear cell carcinoma tissues.


The CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms revealed that TREM-1 was correlated with the infiltration of 12 types of immune cells. Therefore, it was determined that TREM-1 was involved in numerous classical pathways in the immune response via GSEA analysis. In Immunohistochemical staining, we found that the expression of TREM-1 was significantly upregulated with increasing tumor grade in renal clear cell carcinoma, and elevated TREM-1 expression was associated with poor prognosis.


The results suggest that TREM-1 may act as an implicit novel prognostic biomarker in ccRCC that could be utilized to facilitate immunotherapeutic strategy.


Globally, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common pathological types of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accounting for about 75% of RCCs [1]. Although ccRCC can be detected in its early stages and surgical resection is the mainstream strategy for its mitigation, up to one-third of patients with ccRCC will still develop metastases [2]. ccRCC is a highly immune-invasive tumor. Immunotherapy-based combination therapies have now become the standard of care, so the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to mitigate tumor-associated suppressed anti-cancer immune responses, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), has revolutionized the treatment of advanced ccRCC and significantly improved survival status in patients with this disease [3, 4]. Despite advances in treatment, patients with advanced ccRCC still have a poor prognosis, mainly due to drug resistance [5]. This response often relies on the dynamic interaction between the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) [6]. However, the molecular mechanisms and pathological processes involved in cancer-causing immunity of ccRCC are unknown.

The TME, which includes tumor cells, local stromal cells, and other immune cells [7], is crucial in tumor progression and metastasis. Moreover, most non-tumor cell populations, such as stromal and immune cells, have been identified as prognostic markers of tumorigenesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that inflammation in TME, in which infiltrated diverse inflammatory cells contribute to tumorigenesis, is generally considered as a hallmark of cancer [8, 9]. Cancer immunotherapy mainly exerts effects with some proteins to enhance the function of or restore immune cells in the TME. Considering the importance of immunity in the development and the treatment of cancer, discovering novel ccRCC immune-related biomarkers may be useful for immunotherapy.

TREM-1 is involved in triggering DAP12 association and Src family kinase-mediated phosphorylation of ITAM tyrosine on cell membranes [10,11,12], followed by recruitment and phosphorylation of GRBP-2, Syk, and ZAP70, thereby initiating downstream signal transduction [10, 11, 13]. These pathways induce the mobilization of Ca2+, actin cytoskeletal rearrangement, and activation of transcription factors such as Elk1 (ETS domain protein), NFAT (nuclear factor that activates T cells), AP1, c-Fos, c-Jun, and Nf-κB, which transcribe genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and cell surface molecules [14]. Recent studies have shown a close link between TREM-1 and cancer, as TREM-1 is selectively expressed on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in non-small cell lung cancer [15], activates in the liver Kupffer cells, and promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [16]. Moreover, the increased abundance of TREM-1 in neutrophils may promote the development of colorectal cancer [17]. Nevertheless, the association of TREM-1 with immune infiltration in ccRCC has not been investigated.

In this paper, we identified the prognostic immune-related genes (IRGs) and immune-related lncRNAs (irlncRNAs) based on the TCGA database. Subsequently, differential expression analysis combined with Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and protein and protein interaction (PPI) analysis were performed to find the immune-related hub gene in high- and low-risk groups by utilizing the LASSO regression model. We have selected and compared IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL13, CXCL8, CXCL2, CXCL6, PI3, NFKBIZ, and TREM1 hub genes. Although these hub genes can secrete the release of promote inflammatory factors, affect the tumor microenvironment [18,19,20,21,22], only TREM-1 is a cell surface receptor and a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that potently amplifies inflammatory responses by secretion of proinflammatory mediators. TREM-1 is known as an activating receptor expressed on neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages [23]. Furthermore, we performed immune microenvironment analysis, immune cell infiltration analysis, clinical correlation analysis, and GSEA analysis for TREM-1 to determine their potential involvement in immune infiltration in ccRCC.


Data collection and pre-processing

The data of 539 ccRCC and 72 normal samples were obtained from the TCGA database ( From the ImmPort database (, a list of recognized 2484 IRGs was obtained. We have covered case-control studies of bioinformatics analysis methods.

Establishment of weighted co-expression network and immune prognostic signature

The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify the modules associated with survival time and status. We obtained a list of irlncRNAs that were co-expressed with the IRGs through Pearson correlation analysis [18]. Then, we conducted a univariate Cox analysis of the irlncRNAs to identify the prognostic irlncRNAs.

Construction of the prognostic IRGs and irlncRNA signature model

To construct the prognostic signature model, the Lasso regression analysis was applied using the R package glmnet. The stability of the model was verified via univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis in combination with the clinicopathological characteristics correlation analysis. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curves and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn using the survminer and timeROC R packages, respectively.

Differential gene analysis and functional enrichment analysis

Differentially expressed IRGs were analyzed through the limma R package using the following screening criteria: false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and log2 |fold change| >1, which means that the difference multiplier is greater than 2 times. Functional enrichment analyses using GO and KEGG were conducted for differentially expressed IRGs using the clusterProfiler R package.

Exploring the hub gene and validation of its mRNA expression level and prognostic value

The hub gene was screened from the IRGs in the GO enrichment results using the String website ( The setting parameters of the String website: network type: full STRING network; meaning of network edges: evidence; active interaction sources: textmining, experiments, databases, co-expression, neighborhood, gene fusion, co-occurrence; minimum required interaction score: medium confidence (0.400); network display mode: interactive svg. Then, the mRNA expression levels of the hub gene in ccRCC were assessed in TIMER and TCGA database. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curve, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were plotted to investigate the prognostic value using the corresponding R packages.

Exploring the relationship between hub gene expression and immunocytes and their marker genes

The ESTIMATE algorithm was applied to evaluate the tumor microenvironment scores. Then, the corresponding survival analysis was performed using the survminer R package. To evaluate the relationship between the proportion of 22 immune cell types and the hub gene, CIBERSORT, a newly developed deconvolution algorithm, was applied. Then, the correlation between TREM-1 expression and the gene markers of the main immune cells was verified in TCGA.

Gene set enrichment analysis and PPI network analysis of the hub gene

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to analyze the immune-related KEGG pathways of the hub gene through the R package. To further investigate the role of the hub gene, we constructed the PPI networks using the String website ( and GeneMANIA (

Chemicals and antibody

All chemical reagents were purchased from Beijing Sinopharm Chemical Reagents Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). TREM-1 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Cat#: sc-9013. Texas, USA).

Kidney cancer tissue

The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded kidney cancer TMA used in this work was obtained from the Department of Pathology, Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang Province from January 2021 to November. To avoid subjective differences, all cancer tissue samples were pathologically confirmed by two pathologists with 8 years of diagnostic experience in accordance with Fuhrman nuclear grading [24]. The use of human kidney cancer tissue samples was approved by the Institutional Ethic Committee of Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province (K20210755).

Entry criteria: (1) patients with no metastasis found before surgery, (2) no history of major diseases or malignant tumors in the past, (3) the specimen collection method is total nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, (4) postoperative or puncture biopsy confirmed clinicopathological confirmation as ccRCC.

Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with evidence of metastasis, who have received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy; (2) patients with postoperative pathological confirmation of mixing two or more clinical pathological types; (3) patients with other major diseases after surgery.


Briefly, paraffin-embedded 3-μm-thick sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, submerged into citric acid buffer for heat-induced antigen retrieval, immersed in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidase activity, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin, incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, and developed using the DAKO ChemMate Envision Kit/HRP (Dako-Cytomation, USA). The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared and mounted. The tissues exhibiting brown staining in the cytoplasm, nucleus, or membrane were considered positive. The slides were scanned using Leica SCN400 slide scanner (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The optical density (OD) of protein expression was quantitatively determined using Image J software.


Identification of prognostic IRGs and irlncRNAs

We identified 1358 differentially expressed IRGs associated with ccRCC using the limma package in the R language. Subsequently, the clinical data of ccRCC and 1358 IRGs were analyzed and classified through WGCNA analysis using the R language (Fig. 1A). A total of 200 prognostic IRGs were obtained by univariate Cox analysis (p < 0.05). Then, we utilized co-expression analysis to obtain irlncRNAs that were co-expressed with IRGs (| r | > 0.6, p < 0.001). A total of 364 irlncRNAs were identified, of which 275 were distinguished as prognostic via univariate Cox analysis (p < 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The WGCNA analysis and the LASSO Cox regression model. A The correlation coefficient and the p value are shown in the figure. B–C The parameters of LASSO Cox regression model

Construction of the prognostic IRGs and irlncRNAs signature model

The previously acquired 200 IRGs and 275 irlncRNAs were used to construct the LASSO Cox regression model regarding the prognosis of ccRCC (Fig. 1B–C). We integrated the expression profiles of 3 hub genes (AR, TREM-1, PTX3) and 3 hub lncRNAs (HOTAIRM1, AC003092.1, DLGAP1-AS2) involved in model construction (Fig. 2A). The risk score was calculated by multiplying the expression level of each gene or lncRNA and its corresponding coefficient. The 530 ccRCC samples were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on the median risk score (Fig. 2B–D). Kaplan Meier analysis showed that the long-term survival time of patients with ccRCC in the high-risk group was shorter than that in the low (Fig. 2E). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC for 3-year survival was 0.718 (Fig. 2F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Risk model construction and its related analysis. A Expression levels of the genes and lncRNAs involved in model construction, ***p < 0.001. B–C Distribution of the risk scores, survival status, and the heat maps of three hub lncRNAs and three hub mRNAs. E–F Survival curve and ROC curve analysis. G Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients with ccRCC

Model validation and clinical relationship assessment

Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression results showed that the tumor stage, tumor grade, and the risk score of this model were all associated with the prognosis of ccRCC (Fig. 2G). These results demonstrated that our model could be used as the independent prognostic factor for ccRCC. The relationship between risk groups and clinicopathological characteristics noted that the risk score was correlated with survival status, tumor grade, and tumor stage but not with the age or gender of the patients (Table 1).

Table 1 Relationship between risk groups and clinicopathological characteristics in 524 ccRCC patients

GO, KEGG, and PPI analyses

We conducted differential gene expression analysis and obtained 503 DEGs, including 66 IRGs. Then, we performed GO and KEGG analysis of these DEGs (Fig. 3A). To search for immune-related DEGs, we selected genes enriched via GO involved in the immune response, including B-cell activation, B-cell mediated immunity, T-cell activation, etc. Next, we constructed the PPI network for these selected immune-related DEGs using string and cytoscape software (Fig. 3B). The number of nodes in the top 20 immune-related DRGs is shown in Fig. 3C. Eventually, we selected a significant module from the MCODE plugin analysis that included the following genes: IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL13, CXCL8, CXCL2, CXCL6, PI3, NFKBIZ and TREM-1 (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The enrichment analysis. A GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of 503 DEGs. B Construction of a PPI network that includes 36 nodes and 64 edges. C The number of nodes in the top 20 immune-related DEGs. D A significant module was selected using the MCODE plugin of Cytotype software

Correlation between TREM-1 expression and ccRCC

We analyzed the clinical relationship between the nine immune-related DEGs and ccRCC according to the ranking order obtained from the ENCODE results and selected the hub gene TREM-1. The oncomine database analysis revealed that TREM-1 was highly expressed in different types of cancer, including ccRCC (Fig. 4A). We further validated the relationship of TREM-1 to ccRCC using the TCGA database, and the results were similar to before (Fig. 4B–C). The TREM-1 levels were gradually upregulated along with the tumor grades and stage 3 to stage 4 in ccRCC (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, the analysis of the clinical characteristics revealed that TREM-1 was correlated with survival status, grade, and TNM stage in ccRCC (Table 2). The survival analysis showed that ccRCC patients with high TREM-1 expression have a shorter survival time than those with low expression (Fig. 4E). Univariate and multifactorial Cox regression results indicated that TREM-1 is an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC (Table 3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The relationship between TREM-1 and ccRCC in TCGA. A The TREM-1 expression profiles in different cancers, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B–D Expression levels of TREM-1 in patients with ccRCC. E Survival curve analysis

Table 2 Relationship between TREM-1 expression level and clinicopathological characteristics in 524 KIRC patients
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate COX regression of TREM-1

Correlation of TREM-1 with immune infiltration and their gene markers in ccRCC

The ESTIMATE results revealed that the presence of stromal cells and immune cells in the high-TREM-1 expression group was more abundant than the group with the low expression (Fig. 5A). The survival analysis showed a negative correlation between the immune score and survival time (Fig. 5B). The CIBERSORT analysis results displayed higher contents of activated memory CD4+ T cells, monocytes, M0 and M2 macrophages, resting dendritic cells, activated resting mast cells, and neutrophils in the high-TREM-1 expression group than in the low-TREM-1 expression group. In contrast, a low expression of TREM-1 yielded higher concentrations of CD8+ T cells, resting NK cells, activated NK cells, M1 macrophages, and resting mast cells (Fig. 5C). In addition, the different abundances of the infiltrated immune cells between the high- and low-TREM-1 expression groups were further confirmed through the correlation analysis conducted between the different marker subsets of immune cells and TREM-1 [25]. These findings validate that TREM-1 is strongly linked with innate immunity since the major innate immune cell types such as dendritic cells, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and macrophages were strongly associated with TREM-1 expression (Table 4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Tumor microenvironment scores and survival analysis. A The immune scores in TME. B The survival analysis of the immune score. C Violin plot of 22 types of immune cells

Table 4 Relationship between TREM-1 and immune cell markers

TREM-1 showed correlation IHC

We found that uniform cytoplasmic and membrane staining showed positive expression of TREM-1. In benign tissues, TREM-1 expression was very low, but high in tumor tissue areas. And TREM-1 expression increased with increasing Fuhrman grade. OD values: Grade 3 vs Grade 1: 0.308 vs 0.199 (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Immunohistochemical analysis of TREM-1 expression in renal clear cell carcinoma

Prediction of the function of TREM-1

GSEA analysis showed that TREM-1 was involved in various immune-related pathways, including B-cell receptor, JAK-STAT, NOD-like receptor, Toll-like receptor, and T-cell receptor signaling pathway (Fig. 7A). Moreover, the string and GeneMANIA results showed that the function of TREM-1 and its associated molecules (TYROBP, CD274, SFTPD, and VSIG4) were primarily related to the negative regulation of mononuclear cell, lymphocyte and leukocyte proliferation, and the negative regulation of lymphocyte activation (Fig. 7B-C). These results indicate that TREM-1 is closely related to immune infiltration. Flow chart of bioinformatics analysis in this paper (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The GSEA and PPI enrichment. A The GSEA results. B–C The functional interactions related to TREM-1 in string and GeneMANIA

Fig. 8
figure 8

Flow chart of bioinformatics analysis in this paper


The TME could affect the prognosis of patients in the primary location, as there is complicated dynamic crosstalk among neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells, including adjacent stromal cells and infiltrating immune cells. In addition, immune and stromal scores were significantly associated with the expression of TREM-1. Our findings showed that only the group with a higher immune score had a poor survival prognosis, consistent with those of Wu et al. [26]. Interestingly, unlike previous studies of gastric cancer [27], clear cell renal cell carcinoma [28], and glioblastoma [29], higher stromal and immune scores indicate better OS in patients, suggesting that TME scores may have different prognostic values in different tumor types. Subsequently, we identified that one of the immune-related hub gene responsible for this difference is TREM1 and is gradually upregulated with increasing pathologic stages and grades. Therefore, TREM1 might be identified as a novel and potential biomarker that could be of interest for further research in ccRCC.

Previous studies have shown that macrophages, which play an essential role in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment, are generally divided into two categories: M1 macrophages of the classical activation pathway and M2 macrophages of the alternative activation pathway. In this study, we found that compared to M1 macrophages, the content of M2 macrophages was more abundant in the high TREM-1 expression group. However, the functions of the two are different, with M1 macrophages inhibiting tumor progression and M2 macrophages having a tumor-promoting phenotype [30, 31]. Furthermore, Yoshihiro et al. revealed that TAMs, especially M2-polarized TAMs, contribute to the activation of STAT3, which can promote cancer cell survival, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment [32]. The content of Tregs is also increased in high TREM-1 group, which could produce immunosuppressive cytokines and immune-inhibitory receptors to disturb the activation of anti-tumor T cell responses, leading to a worse prognosis.

We further found that TREM-1 levels in ccRCC correlate with T cell exhaustion markers (PD-1 and CTLA-4). CTLA-4 and PD-1, which have been widely studied in malignant tumors, can be converted into immune regulation of TME [33]. PD-1 signaling inhibits Akt phosphorylation by preventing CD28-mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). The differential regulation of PI3K activation by the ligation of PD-1 and CTLA-4 led to different cell phenotypes, while TREM-1’s conduction pathway can lead to downstream signal transduction of PI3K [34]. Hence, TREM-1 might play a critical role in regulating the tumor microenvironment in ccRCC and may influence the prognosis of patients.

To explore the underlying molecular mechanism of TREM-1, we further conducted GSEA and constructed the PPI network. GSEA results revealed that the pathways involving TREM-1 were mainly enriched in the B-cell receptor, JAK/STAT, NOD-like receptor, T-cell receptor, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. These pathways have previously been reported to be involved in the immune response in ccRCC [35,36,37]. As reported, the effect of inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway on the suppression of immune activity appears promising and could become a strategy to prevent tumor progression [38]. The top 10 related genes that may have a similar function in ccRCC were predicted by constructing a string network. A recent study uncovered TREM2/APOE/C1Q-positive macrophage infiltration as a potential prognostic biomarker and a candidate therapeutic target [39]. Further research revealed that TYROBP, HMGB1, and TLR4 were also significantly associated with the progression of ccRCC (40).

However, this research had a few limitations. First, although we confirmed that TREM-1 was highly expressed in tumor tissue compared with benign tissue, and the expression was positively correlated with Fuhrman grade, by immunohistochemistry experiment. However, due to the limitation of the small number of tumor tissue sections, the expression and distribution of TREM-1 and the invasion of immune cells were not simultaneously investigated. Second, the bioinformatics analysis needs to be supported by future biological experiments that involve in vivo and in vitro methods. In summary, these results indicate that TREM-1 may have the potential to drive the progression of ccRCC. Therefore, this gene may serve as an independent prognostic predictor and be a candidate novel biomarker for ccRCC diagnosis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. Clark DJ, Dhanasekaran SM, Petralia F, Pan J, Song X, Hu Y, et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cell. 2019;179(4):964-83 e31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonasch E, Walker CL, Rathmell WK. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma ontogeny and mechanisms of lethality. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(4):245–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diab A, Tannir NM, Bentebibel S-E, Hwu P, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Haymaker C, et al. Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: phase i dose-escalation study of safety, efficacy, and immune activation (PIVOT-02). Cancer Discov. 2020;10(8):1158–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell BL, Sooklal SA, Malindisa ST, Daka LJ, Ntwasa M. The tumor microenvironment factors that promote resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:641428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Molina AM, Lin X, Korytowsky B, Matczak E, Lechuga MJ, Wiltshire R, et al. Sunitinib objective response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 1059 patients treated on clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(2):351–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu T, Dai Y. Tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response. Cancer Lett. 2017;387:61–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J, Bae J-S. Tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils in tumor microenvironment. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:6058147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu K, Lin K, Li X, Yuan X, Xu P, Ni P, et al. Redefining tumor-associated macrophage subpopulations and functions in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li S, Xu W. Mining TCGA database for screening and identification of hub genes in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma microenvironment. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121(8-9):3952–60.

  10. Bouchon A, Dietrich J, Colonna M. Cutting edge: inflammatory responses can be triggered by TREM-1, a novel receptor expressed on neutrophils and monocytes. J Immunol. 2000;164(10):4991–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharif O, Knapp S. From expression to signaling: roles of TREM-1 and TREM-2 in innate immunity and bacterial infection. Immunobiology. 2008;213(9–10):701–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duc Nguyen H, Hoang NMH, Jo WH, Ham JR, Lee M-K, Kim MS. Associations among the TREM-1 pathway, tau hyperphosphorylation, prolactin expression, and metformin in diabetes mice. NeuroImmunoModulation. 2022;29(4):359–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortin CF, Lesur O, Fulop T. Effects of TREM-1 activation in human neutrophils: activation of signaling pathways, recruitment into lipid rafts and association with TLR4. Int Immunol. 2007;19(1):41–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tammaro A, Derive M, Gibot S, Leemans JC, Florquin S, Dessing MC. TREM-1 and its potential ligands in non-infectious diseases: from biology to clinical perspectives. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;177:81–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan Z, Mehta HJ, Mohammed K, Nasreen N, Roman R, Brantly M, et al. TREM-1 is induced in tumor associated macrophages by cyclo-oxygenase pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e94241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu J, Li J, Salcedo R, Mivechi NF, Trinchieri G, Horuzsko A. The proinflammatory myeloid cell receptor TREM-1 controls Kupffer cell activation and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72(16):3977–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Saurer L, Zysset D, Rihs S, Mager L, Gusberti M, Simillion C, et al. TREM-1 promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14870.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Porta C, Riboldi E, Ippolito A, Sica A. Molecular and epigenetic basis of macrophage polarized activation. Semin Immunol. 2015;27(4):237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schultze JL, Schmidt SV. Molecular features of macrophage activation. Semin Immunol. 2015;27(6):416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis CE, Pollard JW. Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res. 2006;66(2):605–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeannin P, Paolini L, Adam C, Delneste Y. The roles of CSFs on the functional polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. FEBS J. 2018;285(4):680–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Korbecki J, Kojder K, Kapczuk P, Kupnicka P, Gawronska-Szklarz B, Gutowska I, et al. The effect of hypoxia on the expression of CXC chemokines and CXC chemokine receptors-a review of literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandestienne M, Zhang Y, Santos-Zas I, Al-Rifai R, Joffre J, Giraud A, et al. TREM-1 orchestrates angiotensin II-induced monocyte trafficking and promotes experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(2):e142468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuhrman SA, Larry CM, Catherine Limas M. Prognostic sugnificance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6(7):655–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu J, Qiu D, Yu A, Hu J, Deng H, Li H, et al. YTHDF1 is a potential pan-cancer biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:607224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu J, Li L, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Wu S, et al. A risk model developed based on tumor microenvironment predicts overall survival and associates with tumor immunity of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Oncogene. 2021;40(26):4413–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang H, Wu X, Chen Y. Stromal-immune score-based gene signature: a prognosis stratification tool in gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu W-H, Xu Y, Wang J, Wan F-N, Wang H-K, Cao D-L, et al. Prognostic value and immune infiltration of novel signatures in clear cell renal cell carcinoma microenvironment. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(17):6999–7020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jia D, Li S, Li D, Xue H, Yang D, Liu Y. Mining TCGA database for genes of prognostic value in glioblastoma microenvironment. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(4):592–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xia Y, Rao L, Yao H, Wang Z, Ning P, Chen X. Engineering macrophages for cancer immunotherapy and drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2020;32(40):e2002054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roumenina LT, Daugan MV, Noé R, Petitprez F, Vano YA, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. Tumor cells hijack macrophage-produced complement C1q to promote tumor growth. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(7):1091–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Komohara Y, Hasita H, Ohnishi K, Fujiwara Y, Suzu S, Eto M, et al. Macrophage infiltration and its prognostic relevance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(7):1424–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rudick CP, Cornell DL, Agrawal DK. Single versus combined immunoregulatory approach using PD-1 and CTLA-4 modulators in controlling sepsis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(9):907–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Parry RV, Chemnitz JM, Frauwirth KA, Lanfranco AR, Braunstein I, Kobayashi SV, et al. CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(21):9543–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W, Voss MH, Li W, Martini DJ, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science. 2018;359(6377):801–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu S, Wang Y, Miao C, Xing Q, Wang Z. High expression of CDCA7 predicts poor prognosis for clear cell renal cell carcinoma and explores its associations with immunity. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Carrasco K, Boufenzer A, Jolly L, Le Cordier H, Wang G, Heck A Jr, et al. TREM-1 multimerization is essential for its activation on monocytes and neutrophils. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16(5):460–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Groner B, von Manstein V. Jak Stat signaling and cancer: opportunities, benefits and side effects of targeted inhibition. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;451:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Obradovic A, Chowdhury N, Haake SM, Ager C, Wang V, Vlahos L, et al. Single-cell protein activity analysis identifies recurrence-associated renal tumor macrophages. Cell. 2021;184(11):2988-3005 e16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang J-F, Shi S-N, Xu W-H, Qiu Y-H, Zheng J-Z, Yu K, et al. Screening, identification and validation of CCND1 and PECAM1/CD31 for predicting prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(24):12057–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the TRIPOD reporting checklist (available at

Peer Review File: Available at tau-20-1348

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).



This work was supported in part by grants from Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Progra (2022ZB388 to Licai Mo). Thanks to the open TCGA public database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception and design: Y Pu, D Cai. Administrative support: G Wu, Q Guo, S Liu. Research implementation: Y Pu, D Cai, L Jin, F Xu, E Ye, L Mo. Collection and assembly: Y Pu, D Cai. Data analysis and interpretation: Y Pu, D Cai, L Jin. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Suzhi Liu, Qunyi Guo or Gang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, Y., Cai, D., Jin, L. et al. TREM-1 as a potential prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. World J Surg Onc 21, 156 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: