- Open Access
Value of multi-detector computed tomography combined with serum tumor markers in diagnosis, preoperative, and prognostic evaluation of pancreatic cancer
World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 20, Article number: 323 (2022)
Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and serum tumor markers are commonly used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). In this article, we focused on the evaluation of the clinical value of MDCT combined with serum tumor markers CA199, CA242, and CEA in diagnosis, preoperative, and prognostic evaluation of PC.
Eighty-five PC patients (PC group) and 39 patients with pancreatitis (control group) admitted to our hospital were selected for our present research study. MDCT, CA199, CA242, and CEA examination were examined in all patients, and their value in diagnosis, preoperative, and prognostic evaluation of PC was retrospectively analyzed.
There were 69 patients whose clinical staging results of MDCT were consistent with the postoperative pathological diagnosis. The coincidence rate was 70.00% in stage I, 62.96% in stage II, 72.72% in stage III, and 80.00% in stage IV, respectively, and the overall coincidence rate was 69.57%The levels of CA199, CA242, and CEA in PC group were remarkably higher than those in control group and were sharply correlated with clinical stage, differentiation degree, and distant metastasis. The sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of MDCT combined with serum CA199, CA242 and CEA in the diagnosis of PC were significantly improved compared with those of each single test. In PC group, the 2-year event-free survival rate of the group with high CA199, CA242, and CEA expression was remarkably lower than that of the low expression group.
MDCT combined with CA199, CA242, and CEA notably improved the diagnostic efficiency of PC and had guiding significance for preoperative and prognostic evaluation of PC.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a ductal adenocarcinoma mostly originating from the glandular epithelium, which is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system. Pancreatic cancer is one of the malignant tumors with a high degree of malignancy and a seriously poor prognosis . With the increase of work pressure, the fast pace of life and the change of diet structure, the incidence of PC has been on the rise worldwide . The pancreas is located behind the peritoneum of human body and is hidden, with many blood vessels and other organs distributed nearby, so it is different to detect PC early. Moreover, there are no typical clinical symptoms in the early stage and the diagnosis is often in the middle and late stages, leading to a poor prognosis . It is reported that the 5-year survival rate of advanced PC is less than 5% . Therefore, early diagnosis of PC, correct assessment of the disease before treatment and formulation of the best treatment are of great significance for improving the prognosis . Imaging is an important means for the diagnosis of PC. Ultrasound is often used as the first choice for the diagnosis of PC, due to its low cost and non-invasive characteristics. However, due to the deep anatomical position of the pancreas and the influence of anterior intestinal gas, it is not effective in identifying small lesions, differentiating benign and malignant tumors and tumor invasion, and is not suitable for the early diagnosis of PC . Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques for the diagnosis of PC, which can provide an objective basis for the diagnosis and preoperative clinical staging evaluation . Serum tumor markers are not only used in the early diagnosis, but also have certain value in prognostic evaluation as quantitative indicators in PC .
In this study, 85 patients with PC were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the clinical value of MDCT combined with serum markers, and to provide reference significance for the early diagnosis of PC.
Materials and methods
From January 2016 to December 2018, 85 patients with PC (PC group) and 39 patients with pancreatitis (control group) admitted to Qilu Hospital (Qingdao) were selected as the research objects. PC group: There were 46 cases of painless jaundice, 80 cases of upper abdominal discomfort, and 73 cases of weight loss. There were 56 males and 29 females. The age range was 35–69 years, with an average of 51.26 ± 8.94 years. Control group: there were 25 males and 14 females. The age ranged from 34 to 70 years, with an average of 52.10 ± 9.03 years. Inclusion criteria were as follows: ① patients were confirmed by histopathology, ② patients were newly diagnosed, and examined by MDCT and serum tumor markers CA199, CA242, and CEA, ③ patients were informed of the study and signed the consent form. Exclusion criteria were as follows: ① with signs of organ failure such as heart, lung, liver and kidney, ② without pathological diagnosis, ③ incomplete research data, ④ with other malignant tumors, ⑤ patients allergic to iohexol. There was no statistical difference in general data between the two groups (p > 0.05), with comparability. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital (YYLUNLH20150230).
Discovery CT 750 HD CT (GE, USA) was used for MDCT examination. The patients were forbidden to eat or drink for 8 hours prior to the examination, which must be performed on an empty stomach. Before examination, patients drank 600 mL of water to fill the duodenum. All positions from the lower kidneys to the top of the diaphragm were sequentially scanned, followed by enhanced scans. The scanning parameters were 2.5 mm of interval and layer thickness, rotation time of 0.5 s/rot, field of view of 348 × 348, collimation of 0.5mm, scanning current and voltage of 300 mA and 120 kV respectively. The contrast agent iohexol was injected into the cubital vein at 3~4 mL/s. Arterial phase, parenchymal phase and delayed phase scanning were performed 20~25, 35~40, and 60~70 s after contrast injection, respectively. The images were processed on a MDCT system. The radiographic review was carried out by two imaging physicians, including the size, morphology, edge, degree of enhancement, nerve infiltration, lymph node metastasis, and tumor stage.
MDCT of PC showed irregular spherical shape with unclear margin and maximum density difference from surrounding normal pancreatic parenchyma. MDCT scan images of PC are shown in Fig. 1. MDCT images of pancreatitis are shown in Fig. 2.
Preoperative clinical staging were as follows : stage I: the diameter of the lesion was less than 2 cm, the lesion was confined to the pancreatic capsule without vascular involvement. Stage II: the tumor was 2–4 cm in diameter, and the capsule was infiltrated by cancer cells without vascular involvement. Stage III: the tumor diameter was over 4 cm, and lymph node metastasis was less than two stations, but with no distant metastasis. Stage IV: the tumor diameter was more than 4 cm, with lymph node metastasis at more than three stations and with distant metastasis.
Serum tumor markers
3.5 ml elbow venous blood was extracted from the two groups on an empty stomach from 6:00–8:00 a.m., and the serum was separated by centrifugation after standing for self-coagulation. CA199, CA242, and CEA were detected by Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (Roche Elecsys-2010, Switzerland).
MDCT results of PC consistent with pathological diagnosis was defined as true positive, and inconsistent was defined as false negative MDCT results of benign pancreatic lesions consistent with the pathological diagnosis was defined as true negative, and inconsistent was false positive. Serum tumor marker less than or equal to the critical value was considered as negative, and greater than the critical value was judged as positive. Joint examination was judged as positive when one or more items were positive, and as negative when all items were negative.
After treatment, patients came to the hospital for re-examination every 2 months, including imaging (CT, magnetic resonance, ultrasound) and serum tumor markers, plus 18F-FDG PET/CT if necessary. Follow-up was discontinued when recurrence, metastasis, or death occurred. No recurrence, metastasis or death occurred during the follow-up period, and the end point of the follow-up period was 24 months.
SPSS19.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Measurement data were expressed by mean ± standard deviation, and comparison between the two groups was performed by t test. The count data were expressed as rate (%), and χ2 test was used for comparison between groups. The diagnostic value of MDCT, CA199, CA242, and CEA in PC was calculated by four-grid table method. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank were used to test survival analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Diagnostic analysis of PC and pancreatitis by MDCT
After MDCT examination of 85 PC, 69 cases (true positive) were consistent with pathological diagnosis, and 16 cases (false negative) were misdiagnosed. In 39 cases of pancreatitis, the results of MSCT were consistent with pathological diagnosis in 34 cases (true negative), and 5 cases were misdiagnosed as PC (false positive). The preoperative clinical staging of MDCT in 69 patients with PC was compared with postoperative pathological staging. The coincidence rate of stage I, II, III, and IV assessment was 70.00% (7/10), 62.96% (17/27), 72.72% (16/22), and 80.00 (8/10), respectively, and the overall coincidence rate was 69.57% (48/69) (Table 1).
Comparison of serum CA199, CA242, and CEA expression levels between PC group and pancreatitis group
The levels of CA199, CA242, and CEA in patients with PC were sharply higher than those in patients with pancreatitis (p < 0.01, Table 2).
Correlation analysis of CA199, CA242, CEA expression levels, and clinicopathological factors in PC
The expression levels of CA199, CA242, and CEA in PC group had no significant correlation with gender, age, and tumor site (p > 0.05), but were notably correlated with clinical stage, differentiation degree, and distant metastasis (p < 0.01, Table 3). The levels of CA199, CA242, and CEA in patients with high stage, low differentiation, or distant metastasis were clearly higher than those in patients with low stage, high and middle differentiation, and no distant metastasis (p < 0.01, Table 3).
Comparison of MDCT combined with CA199, CA242, and CEA in diagnosis of PC
The results of MDCT, CA199, CA242, and CEA in diagnosis of PC were compared with the pathological diagnosis (Table 4). The comparison of single and combined examination of MDCT, CA199, CA242, and CEA in diagnosis of PC was shown in Table 5. The sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of MDCT combined with CA199, CA242, and CEA in the diagnosis of PC were sharply higher than those of each single examination (p < 0.01).
Effects of CA199, CA242, and CEA levels on prognosis before treatment
Before treatment, the 2-year event-free survival rate in high expression group of serum tumor markers (CA199 > 418.06 U/mL, CA242 > 389.46 U/mL, CEA > 203.44 ng/mL) was significantly lower than the low expression group (CA199 ≤ 418.06 U/mL, CA242 ≤ 389.46 U/mL, CEA ≤ 203.44 ng/mL) (χ2 = 9.746, 12.896, 10.212, p = 0.002, 0.000, 0.001, p < 0.01, Figs. 3, 4, and 5).
At present, MDCT has become the first choice for diagnosis, tumor staging and treatment planning of PC . MDCT is a method to display the structure of tumor lesions by imaging the density difference between lesions and tissues . MDCT in the diagnosis of PC can clearly observe the location, size, enhancement, adjacent fat space, and relationship with surrounding tissues, as well as pancreatic lymph node metastasis, vascular infiltration, and distant metastasis, which has certain advantages for preoperative evaluation of clinical stage . All the patients in this study presented iso-density or low-density on MDCT plain scan, and the tumor density was similar to that of pancreatic parenchyma, so it was easy to miss diagnosis by plain scan. When dynamic enhanced scan was performed, the enhancement of the lesion was not obvious and showed a low-density shadow, while the surrounding pancreas was significantly enhanced and the density was relatively uniform, which made the outline and morphology of the tumor more clear . The main reasons for misdiagnosis in this study may be that the lesions were small and easy to be missed. On the other hand, some tumors were difficult to be accurately located and may show atypical imaging manifestations. For example, in two cases of mass pancreatitis, the lesions were located in the head of the pancreas, and the lesions were compressed into the common bile duct and pancreatic duct, resulting in double duct sign. The other two patients had obvious low-density lesions on plain scan, and the enhancement pattern on enhanced scan was similar to that of PC, thus causing misdiagnosis. Preoperative staging of patients with PC can provide an important basis for making an accurate surgical plan. The results of this study showed that the overall coincidence rate between preoperative clinical staging and postoperative pathological staging of MDCT was 69.57%, which was basically consistent with the previous report . Although MDCT is of great value in the diagnosis of PC, the sensitivity of the lesion to a diameter smaller than 2 cm causes a certain degree of misdiagnosis.
As a simple and non-invasive diagnostic method, serum tumor markers have been widely used in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of various tumors. A large number of studies have shown that biomarkers related to PC have certain guiding significance for early diagnosis and prognosis assessment, including CA199, CA242, CA50, CEA, etc. . CA199 is the most widely used and effective tumor marker in the diagnosis of PC, and was once known as the ‘gold marker’ in the diagnosis of PC . CA199, a Lewis blood group antigen, is significantly increased in the serum of PC patients . However, CA199 was also increased in biliary tract obstruction, pancreatitis, and other digestive tract tumors, which limits its clinical application. Therefore, CA199 cannot be used as a separate indicator to distinguish PC from benign pancreatic diseases . In addition, some people lack Lewis-a blood group antigen gene and do not express CA199. Even if PC occurs, they cannot synthesized CA199 resulting in false negative . CA242 is mainly expressed in pancreatic and colon malignant tumors . Serum CA242 level was increased in patients with PC, especially in patients with pancreatic head cancer . CA242 expression was not affected by bile secretion and Lewis antigen . Additionally, studies have shown  that CA242 was rarely expressed in patients with acute pancreatitis and biliary benign diseases, and basically not affected by acute pancreatitis and cholecystosis, so it can be used as a marker related to the diagnosis of PC. CEA, as a broad-spectrum tumor marker, is involved in cell adhesion and only exists in trace in serum of healthy persons . CEA is widely used as a biomarker for colorectal cancer, but about 60% of patients with PC have elevated serum CEA level. Although the practical frequency is not as high as CA199, CEA can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic indicator for PC combined examination , especially in judging the recurrence and metastasis of PC . Our study found that the levels of serum CA199, CA242, and CEA in PC group were clearly higher than those in control group. The levels of CA199, CA242, and CEA in PC group were not significantly correlated with age, sex, and tumor site, but were notably correlated with tumor size, differentiation degree, clinical stage, and metastasis. However, as an in vitro diagnostic test, the detection of tumor markers is prone to false positive and false negative due to the influence of internal and external factors, so it should be combined with imaging.
To sum up, both imaging and serological examinations have their own advantages and disadvantages. MDCT combined with serum tumor markers in the diagnosis of PC can complement and confirm each other, significantly improve the sensitivity and accuracy compared with single examination, and have guiding significance for preoperative and prognostic evaluation.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Rieser CJ, Zenati M, Narayanan S, Bahary N, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH. Optimal management of resectable pancreatic head cancer in the elderly patient: does neoadjuvant therapy offer a survival benefit? Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6264–72.
Kardosh A, Lichtensztajn DY, Gubens MA, Kunz PL, Fisher GA, Clarke CA. Long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer: a california population-based study. Pancreas. 2018;47(8):958–66.
Outani H, Akita H, Nakai T, Takada R, Imura Y, Tanaka T, Tamiya H, Oshima K, Takahashi H, Ohkawa K, Katayama K, Araki N, Naka N. Clinical features and prognosis of patients with the bone metastasis of pancreatic cancer: a single-institutional cohort study. Pancreas. 2018;47(7):e43–6.
Neesse A, Bauer CA, Öhlund D, Lauth M, Buchholz M, Michl P, Tuveson DA, Gress TM. Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer: ready for clinical translation? Gut. 2019;68(1):159–71.
Silvestris N, Brunetti O, Pinto R, Petriella D, Argentiero A, Fucci L, Tommasi S, Danza K, De Summa S. Immunological mutational signature in adenosquamous cancer of pancreas: an exploratory study of potentially therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2018;22(5):453–61.
Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, Kamel IR, Schulick R, Zhang Z, Topazian M, Takahashi N, Fletcher J, Petersen G, Klein AP, Axilbund J, Griffin C, Syngal S, Saltzman JR, Mortele KJ, Lee J, Tamm E, Vikram R, Bhosale P, Margolis D, Farrell J, Goggins M. American Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):796–804.
Zamboni GA, Ambrosetti MC, Guariglia S, Cavedon C, Pozzi Mucelli R. Single-energy low-voltage arterial phase MDCT scanning increases conspicuity of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(3):e113-117.
Young MR, Wagner PD, Ghosh S, Rinaudo JA, Baker SG, Zaret KS, Goggins M, Srivastava S. Validation of biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic cancer: summary of the alliance of pancreatic cancer consortia for biomarkers for early detection workshop. Pancreas. 2018;47(2):135–41.
Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.
Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Miyoshi T, Shiratori Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(3):751–6.
Du T, Bill KA, Ford J, Barawi M, Hayward RD, Alame A, Berri RN. The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: a comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography with pancreas protocol. Am J Surg. 2018;215(3):472–5.
Liu QY, Lin XF, Li HG, Gao M, Zhang WD. Tumors with macroscopic bile duct thrombi in non-HCC patients: dynamic multi-phase MSCT findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(11):1273–8.
Scialpi M, Cagini L, Pierotti L, De Santis F, Pusiol T, Piscioli I, Magli M, D’Andrea A, Brunese L, Rotondo A. Detection of small (≤ cm) pancreatic adenocarcinoma and surrounding parenchyma: correlations between enhancement patterns at triphasic MDCT and histologic features. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:16.
Morgan DE, Waggoner CN, Canon CL, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Posey JA, Vickers SM. Resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with locally advanced disease downstaged by preoperative therapy: a challenge for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(3):615–22.
Liao Q, Zhao YP, Yang YC, Li LJ, Long X, Han SM. Combined detection of serum tumor markers for differential diagnosis of solid lesions located at the pancreatic head. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6(6):641–5.
Zhang S, Wang YM, Sun CD, Lu Y, Wu LQ. Clinical value of serum CA19-9 levels in evaluating resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(23):3750–3.
Luo G, Xiao Z, Long J, Liu Z, Liu L, Liu C, Xu J, Ni Q, Yu X. CA125 is superior to CA19-9 in predicting the resectability of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(12):2092–8.
Chen Y, Gao SG, Chen JM, Wang GP, Wang ZF, Zhou B, Jin CH, Yang YT, Feng XS. Serum CA242, CA199, CA125, CEA, and TSGF are biomarkers for the efficacy and prognosis of cryoablation in pancreatic cancer patients. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71(3):1287–91.
Ge L, Pan B, Song F, Ma J, Zeraatkar D, Zhou J, Tian J. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12): e018175.
Gu YL, Lan C, Pei H, Yang SN, Liu YF, Xiao LL. Applicative value of serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125 and CA242 in diagnosis and prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6569–73.
Gui JC, Yan WL, Liu XD. CA19-9 and CA242 as tumor markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med. 2014;14(2):225–33.
Zhang Y, Yang J, Li H, Wu Y, Zhang H, Chen W. Tumor markers CA19-9, CA242 and CEA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11683–91.
Lei XF, Jia SZ, Ye J, Qiao YL, Zhao GM, Li XH, Chang H. Application values of detection of serum CA199, CA242 and CA50 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31(2):383–8.
Xing H, Wang J, Wang Y, Tong M, Hu H, Huang C, Li D. Diagnostic value of CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:8704751.
Kim YC, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Shin JH. Can preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels predict the resectability of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(12):1869–75.
Lee KJ, Yi SW, Chung MJ, Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB, Park JY. Serum CA19-9 and CEA levels as a prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(3):643–9.
No funding was received.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University. Signed written informed consents were obtained from the patients and/or guardians.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Su, J., Wang, Y., Shao, H. et al. Value of multi-detector computed tomography combined with serum tumor markers in diagnosis, preoperative, and prognostic evaluation of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg Onc 20, 323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02785-x
- Pancreatic cancer
- Multi-detector computed tomography