Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of prolonged postoperative ileus between laparoscopic right and left colectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score matching analysis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 20, Article number: 68 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There were differences in the recovery of bowel function and prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) between laparoscopic right colectomy (RC) and left colectomy (LC) under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Methods

We selected 870 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy from June 2016 to December 2021, including 272 patients who had RC and 598 who had LC. According to 1:1 proportion for propensity score matching and correlation analysis, 247 patients who had RC and 247 who had LC were finally enrolled.

Results

The incidence of PPOI in all patients was 13.1%. Age, sex, smoking habit, preoperative serum albumin level, operation type, and operation time were the important independent risk factors based on multivariate logistic regression and correlation analysis for PPOI (p<0.05). Age, sex, body mass index, preoperative serum albumin level, operation time, and degree of differentiation between the two groups were significantly different before case matching (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics and preoperative biochemical parameters between the two groups after case matching (p>0.05). The incidence of PPOI in patients who had RC was 21.9%, while that in patients who had LC was 13.0%. The first flatus, first semi-liquid, and length of stay in LC patients were lower than those in RC patients (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The return of bowel function in LC was faster than that in RC, and the incidence of PPOI was relatively lower. Therefore, caution should be taken during the early feeding of patients who had laparoscopic RC.

Introduction

Postoperative ileus (POI) is defined as an inevitable, temporary decrease in gastrointestinal motility following major abdominal surgery. The average gut dysmotility is widely reported to last 0–24 h in the small intestine, 24–48 h in the stomach, and 48–72 h in the colon [1, 2]. Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a gastrointestinal function that does not recover beyond this time. The principal manifestation of PPOI is nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, pain, inability to eat or drink, and delayed passage of flatus and stool, which lead to increased postoperative complications, slow rehabilitation, extended length of hospital stay, aggravating financial burden, and increased mortality risk [3, 4].

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program aims to promote early feeding and progressive patient mobilization, shorten the length of hospital stay, and improve the quality of life of patients without affecting the overall survival and relapse-free survival [5,6,7]. ERAS has been rapidly popularized and applied in recent years. In 2017, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) jointly released the clinical practice guideline of ERAS in colorectal surgery to provide important references and guidance for clinical work [8]. There are obvious differences in clinicopathological features, molecular biology, histological features, and prognosis between left and right colon tumors [9, 10]. Moreover, there are differences in the return of bowel function and complications after surgery [11]. However, the ERAS clinical practice guideline does not distinguish between right colectomy (RC) and left colectomy (LC). Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the incidence of PPOI and postoperative return of bowel function between laparoscopic RC and LC with the ERAS protocol.

Methods

Patients

Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy at Fujian Cancer Hospital from June 2016 to December 2021 were selected for the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathologically confirmed colon cancer; (2) radical resection; (3) adequate implementation of more than 70% compliance with the ERAS protocol (The ERAS pathway is shown in Table 1); and (4) complete clinical characteristics. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) emergency surgery for preoperative intestinal hemorrhage and ileus; (2) multi-organ resection combined with colorectal cancer; (3) mental disturbance; (4) temporary ileostomy; and (5) conversion to open surgery during the operation.

Table 1 ERAS protocol applied in the study
Full size table

Definitions

RC is defined as the removal of the terminal ileum and the ascending right colon followed by an ileo-colonic anastomosis, including cecal, ascending, and hepatic flexure colon cancers.

LC is defined as the resection of the descending colon or the sigmoid colon followed by a colo-colonic anastomosis, including splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, and rectosigmoid junction colon cancers [12, 13]. During the study period, 870 patients with colon cancer were included as research subjects, including 598 who had LC and 272 who had RC.

The definition of PPOI has not been unified yet. According to references, PPOI is defined as meeting two or more of the following criteria, which were assessed on or after the fourth day of the postoperative period [14, 15]: 1. nausea or vomiting, 2. inability to tolerate an oral diet over the last 24 h, 3. abdominal distention, 4. absence of flatus over the last 24 h, and 5. ileus noted on plain abdominal films or computed tomography scans.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS 24.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. The continuous data were evaluated using the Student’s test or Mann–Whitney U test. The chi-square test was used to compare the count data of the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with PPOI. Variables with p <0.05 in the univariate analyses were analyzed in the subsequent multivariable logistic regression model. The nearest neighbor matching method was used for 1:1 matching, and the caliper value was 0.05. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05.

Results

Postoperative outcomes of patients

PPOI occurred in 13.1% (114/870) of all patients with colon cancer. The average length of postoperative hospital stay in patients with PPOI was 8.6±2.5 days, which was significantly longer than the 6.3±1.1 days in patients without no PPOI before case matching (t=12.049, p=0.000).

Univariate and multivariate analysis of PPOI risk factors in colon cancer

Among the same background and comorbidity measures, sex, age, smoking habit, preoperative serum albumin level, operation type, and operation time were associated with PPOI (Table 2). All these variables were entered in the multivariate logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis found the following independent risk factors for PPOI: sex (odds ratio [OR]=2.242), age (OR=0.935), smoking habit (OR=1.732), preoperative serum albumin level (OR=1.072), operation type (OR=2.193), and operation time (OR=2.205) (Table 3).

Table 2 Univariate analysis for PPOI risk factors in colon cancer
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of PPOI after colon cancer surgery
Full size table

Comparison of the type of surgical procedure of patients who had RC

The occurrence probability of PPOI in patients who had laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) was higher than that in patients who had totally laparoscopic right colectomy (TLRC). Compared with LRC, TLRC was associated with shorter first flatus, first semi-liquid diet, and postoperative length of stay (p<0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and discharge time between LRC and TLRC
Full size table

Comparison of general clinicopathological data of patients who had RC and LC before matching

Compared with patients who had RC, statistical differences were observed in age, sex, body mass index BMI, preoperative serum albumin level, operation time, and grade of differentiation in patients who had LC before case matching. The incidence of PPOI in patients who had RC was 20.6% (56/272), which was higher than the 9.7% incidence (58/598) in patients who had LC. The first flatus, semi-liquid diet, and length of postoperative hospital stay in patients who had RC were higher than those in patients who had LC (Table 5).

Table 5 Demographic characteristics of patients and postoperative functional recovery before matching
Full size table

Clinicopathological characteristics after case matching

To reduce the possibility of selection bias, we conducted propensity score matching. Based on baseline data, the propensity score matching method was conducted with 1:1 matching, and 247 patients were included in each group. The clinicopathological features between the two groups were not statistically significantly different after matching (Table 6).

Table 6 Comparison of the two groups’ baseline characteristics after matching
Full size table

Comparison of the return of bowel function and length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups after matching

The occurrence probability of PPOI in patients who had RC was 21.9% (54/247), while the occurrence probability of PPOI in patients who had LC was 13.0% (32/247). The time of first flatus, semi-liquid time, and length of postoperative hospital stay in patients who had LC were lower than those in patients who had RC (p<0.05) (Table 7).

Table 7 Comparison of postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and discharge time between the two groups
Full size table

Discussion

Compared with open colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy has many advantages, such as faster postoperative return of bowel function, fewer complications, less pain, fewer hospital stays, and similar long-term effect [16,17,18]. The clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the ASCRS and SAGES strongly recommends employing a minimally invasive surgical approach whenever expertise is available and appropriate for colon cancer [8]. Laparoscopic colectomy has been widely recognized worldwide. Since 2016, most patients with curable colon cancer have undergone laparoscopic surgery in our hospital. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were included in this study to eliminate errors and improve the reliability of research.

Murphy et al. [19] studied 9734 patients identified from the colectomy-specific American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent elective surgery. They found that 1364 (14%) patients had PPOI. Alhashemi et al. [14] found that the incidence of PPOI was 19% after colorectal surgery in the context of enhanced recovery pathways. The incidence of PPOI is 10.3% in a meta-analysis comprising 18,983 patients with colon cancer [20]. This is similar to the 13.1% overall incidence of PPOI in our study. However, a snapshot, prospective, observational study in England showed that the rate of PPOI was as high as 22.5% after elective colorectal surgery [21]. The reason may be that perioperative management was not performed in accordance with the ERAS guidelines in this study.

As early as 1990, Bufill confirmed the difference between right and left colon cancer from the perspective of molecular genetics and proposed that they can be regarded as distinct disease entities for the first time [22]. Subsequently, a large number of studies showed significant differences between them, such as clinical features, epidemiological features, histological characteristics, molecular biology, treatment, and prognosis [23,24,25]. In this study, we found statistical differences in age, sex, BMI, preoperative serum albumin level, and grade of differentiation among the two groups. Although not strongly supported by the references, the surgery of LC is more challenging to perform than that of RC due to better exposure and intraperitoneal location of the anastomosis, especially when splenic flexure mobilization or rectal mobilization is warranted [26]. In this study, the operation time of LC was longer than that of RC, indicating that LC surgery may be more difficult.

Although postoperative recovery following colorectal surgery has been well studied, few studies have directly compared the incidence of PPOI and recovery from RC and LC. The first flatus, first semi-liquid diet, and PPOI of patients who had RC are higher than those of patients who had LC. Moreover, this study showed that age, sex, smoking history, smoking habit, preoperative serum albumin level, operation type, and operation time were independent risk factors for PPOI. Therefore, propensity score matching was used to reduce the deviation caused by interference factors and make the baseline characteristics of the two groups more comparable. After matching, the differences in clinicopathologic features between the two groups were not statistically significant. The first flatus, first semi-liquid diet, length of postoperative hospital stays, and PPOI in patients who had RC were higher than those of patients who had LC. It shows that the return of bowel function after RC surgery is slower and the incidence of PPOI is higher than that in patients who had LC. Consistent with previously published studies, Garfinkle et al. [13] conducted a study based on 40,636 patients who had colon surgery in the public database of the American College of Surgeons and concluded that the PPOI of patients who had RC was 35% higher than the PPOI of those who had LC (OR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.25–1.47). The RC group also had a longer mean length of stay and more 30-day readmissions. Yuan et al. [11] studied 94 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resections with primary anastomosis and found that LC results in a faster return of bowel function than RC. Grass et al. [12] found that the operative time of LC was longer than that of RC, but the incidence of PPOI in LC was lower than that in RC.

The pathophysiological mechanism underlying the slower recovery of bowel function and higher incidences of PPOI in RC has not been fully clarified. One possible explanation is that the most distal region of the colon has a specialized “rectosigmoid brake” role, with retrograde cyclic motor patterns (CMPs) occurring prominently after meals at a rate of approximately 2–4 cycles per minute, which limits rectal filling and thereby potentially contributes to continence [27]. A recent manometry study in patients who had RC showed that the distal colon becomes hyperactive after surgery with CMPs [28]. Another explanation could be that the colonic peristalsis and transit are regulated by the ileocecal valve. The ileocecal valve’s loss during RC and bowel disturbances are due to bacterial translocation from the colon to the small intestine [29, 30]. A third explanation could be the increased trauma to the small bowel associated with an ileocolic anastomosis compared to a more distal anastomosis. Surgical trauma results in a surge in sympathetic and adrenergic motor neuron activity, which causes intestinal analysis [31]. Other authors have also cited differences in vagal innervation between the proximal colon (inputs from the brainstem) and distal colon (inputs from pelvic ganglia). It has been proposed that the “pacemaker” regions in the distal colon contribute to the normal regulation of the intestinal transit, and resection of these may lead to accelerated postoperative transit through the distal colon [21].

The surgical procedure for RC is not standardized, including LRC and TLRC. TLRC was associated with significantly faster to first flatus, first semi-liquid diet, and postoperative length of stay, confirming that TLRC leads to faster recovery of bowel functions after surgery. LRC requires extracorporeal anastomosis, while TLRC requires directly intracorporeal anastomosis. TLRC with a lesser bowel mobilization, manipulation, and traction could lead to faster recovery of bowel function [32].

Conclusion

Although ERAS has been widely accepted and popularized, PPOI remains an incurable complication after colectomy. The return of bowel function in patients who had RC was slower than those who had LC, and the incidence of RC’s PPOI was relatively higher. ERAS requires normal oral intake to be restored as soon as possible, but it may be necessary to appropriately extend the fasting time for patients who had RC.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on request from the authors.

Abbreviations

POI:

Postoperative ileus

PPOI:

Prolonged postoperative ileus

ERAS:

Enhanced recovery after surgery

ASCRS:

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

SAGES:

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

RC:

Right colectomy

LC:

Left colectomy

OR:

Odds ratio

CMPs:

Cyclic motor patterns

References

  1. Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I. Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:962–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, et al. Postoperative ileus: Recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):367–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao H, Milne TGE, O’Grady G, et al. Prolonged postoperative ileus significantly increases the cost of inpatient stay for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: results of a multivariate analysis of prospective data at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;05,62(5):631–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, et al. Postoperative ileus-more than just prolonged length of stay? J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(9):1684–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ota H, Ikenaga M, Hasegawa J, et al. Safety and efficacy of an “enhanced recovery after surgery” protocol for patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a multi-institutional controlled study. Surg Today. 2017;47(6):668–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang B, Wu Z, Zhang R, et al. Retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery pathways in stage II-III colorectal cancer patients submitted to surgery and adjuvant therapy. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viannay P, Hamy A, Jaouen R, et al. Does enhanced recovery improve the survival rates of patients 3 years after undergoing surgery to remove a tumor in the colon? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(3):441–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, et al. Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3412–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung MK, Shin US, Ki YJ, et al. Is the Location of the Tumor Another Prognostic Factor for Patients With Colon Cancer? Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee MS, Menter DG, Kopetz S. Right versus left colon cancer 10. biology: integrating the consensus molecular subtypes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(3):411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan L, O'Grady G, Milne T, et al. Prospective comparison of return of bowel function after left versus right colectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(4):E242–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grass F, Lovely JK, Crippa J, et al. Comparison of recovery and outcome after left and right colectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(4):481–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garfinkle R, Al-Rashid F, Morin N, et al. Are right-sided colectomies for neoplastic disease at increased risk of primary postoperative ileus compared to left-sided colectomies? A coarsened exact matched analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(12):5304–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alhashemi M, Fiore JF, Safa N, et al. Incidence and predictors of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(7):2313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang WQ, Zhang KC, Li H, et al. Preoperative albumin levels predict prolonged postoperative ileus in gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;21,26(11):1185–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang W, Li J, Zhang W, et al. Prolonged postoperative ileus in gastric surgery: Is there any difference between laparoscopic and open surgery? Cancer Med. 2019;09,8(12):5515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishibe A, Ota M, Fujii S, et al. Midterm follow-up of a randomized trial of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):3890–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang ZF, Wu DQ, Wang JJ, et al. Short-and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(1):76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy MM, Tevis SE, Kennedy GD. Independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus development. J Surg Res. 2016;201(2):279–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, et al. Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:01–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yorkshire Surgical Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study of gastrointestinal recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bufill JA. Colorectal cancer: evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal or distal tumor location. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(10):779–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalantzis I, Nonni A, Pavlakis K, et al. Clinicopathological differences and correlations between right and left colon cancer. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(8):1424–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Beltrán L, González-Trejo S, Carmona-Herrera DD, et al. Prognostic factors and differences in survival of right and left colon carcinoma: a strobe compliant retrospective cohort study. Arch Med Res. 2019;50(2):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Helvaci K, Eraslan E, Yildiz F, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological and survival features of right and left colon cancers. J BUON. 2019;24(5):1845–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Turrado-Rodriguez V, Targarona Soler E, Bollo Rodriguez JM, et al. Are there differences between right and left colectomies when performed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin AY, Du P, Dinning PG, et al. High-resolution anatomic correlation of cyclic motor patterns in the human colon: evidence of a rectosigmoid brake. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;312:G508–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seo SHB, Bissett I. O’Grady G, et al. Variable gut function recovery after right vs. left colectomy may be due to rectosigmoid hyperactivity. Front Physiol. 2021;12:635167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(9):1349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Foloranmi S, Rakoczy G, Bruce J, et al. Ileocaecal valve:how important is it? Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:613–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut. 2009;58:1300–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang M, Lu Z, Zheng Z, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between totally laparoscopic right colectomy and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy: a retrospective study in a single institution on 300 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(1):176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Fujian Cancer Hospital (Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery) for collecting the data of the patients.

Funding

This work was supported by the Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University (Grant number:2018QH1231,2019QH1199), Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project (Grant number:2021TG015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, No 420 fuma road, Jin’ an district, Fuzhou, China

    Zhenmeng Lin, Chunkang Yang, Yi Wang & Mingfang Yan

  2. Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, No 420 fuma road, Jin’ an district, Fuzhou, China

    Huizhe Zheng

Authors
  1. Zhenmeng Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chunkang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingfang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huizhe Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhenmeng Lin analyzed the data and wrote the paper. Chunkang Yang designed the study and provided clinical advice. Yi Wang and Mingfang Yan conducted the literature search and collected the clinical data. Huizhe Zheng designed the study and supervised the statistical data. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huizhe Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Fujian Cancer Hospital. All patients signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Z., Yang, C., Wang, Y. et al. Comparison of prolonged postoperative ileus between laparoscopic right and left colectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg Onc 20, 68 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02504-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02504-6

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us