Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease: a propensity score-matched analysis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 18, Article number: 266 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with Graves’ disease (GD) are at a 2.5 times higher risk of developing thyroid cancer than the general population. Previous studies reported conflicting results about the prognosis of thyroid cancer concomitant with GD. This study aimed to investigate the effect of GD to the recurrence rates of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods

We reviewed 3628 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC at the Ewha Womans University Medical Center from January 2006 to June 2014. Of those, 114 patients had non-occult PTC with concomitant GD. To reduce potential confounding effects and selection bias, we conducted 1:5 propensity score matching and analyzed the recurrence-free survival.

Results

Thyroid cancer in patients with GD showed lower rate of lymphatic invasion (1.8% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.037), microscopic resection margin involvement (0.9% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.024), and lymph node metastasis (29.8% vs. 37.3%; p = 0.001) than in patients without GD, respectively. During the median follow-up of 94.1 months, recurrence occurred in one patient (0.9%) with GD. After propensity score matching for adjusting clinicopathological features, 5-year recurrence-free survival was comparable between patients with GD and euthyroid patients (100% vs. 98.4%, p = 0.572). Both tumor size [hazard ratio (HR) 1.585, p < 0.001] and lymph node metastasis (HR for N1a 3.067, p = 0.024; HR for N1b 15.65, p < 0.001) were predictive factors for recurrence-free survival, while GD was not associated with the recurrence.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that GD does not affect the prognosis of PTC. Thyroid cancer in patients with GD is not more aggressive than in euthyroid patients.

Background

Graves’ disease (GD) is an autoimmune thyroid disease and is considered the most common cause of hyperthyroidism [1]. The prevalence of GD is about 0.5% in the general population, with a lifetime risk of 0.5% for men and 3% for women. The central mechanism of GD is an activation of thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies (TSAbs), which provoke the overproduction of thyroid hormone [2]. As the binding of TSAbs to thyrotropin receptor promotes tumor formation and angiogenesis, GD can be associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer [3, 4]. TSAbs also upregulate various growth factors and enhance tumor invasiveness [5, 6]. Autoimmunity of GD and altered host immune tolerance further increases the risk of thyroid cancer [7, 8].

Thyroid cancer in patients with GD was reported with incidences varying from 2.3 to 21.1% [9,10,11,12]. A meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma was roughly 2.5 times higher in patients with GD than in the general population [4]. In recent two nationwide cohort studies, the hazard ratio for developing thyroid cancer might be up to 12-fold higher for patients with GD than the general population [11, 12]. Over 85% of thyroid cancer in patients with GD were papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), although other histologic types including follicular, medullary, and anaplastic carcinoma could be found in those studies. The higher prevalence of thyroid cancer raised interests about the prognosis in patients with GD.

There is an ongoing debate about the prognosis of thyroid cancer associated with GD. Some previous studies indicated that recurrence and disease-specific mortality of thyroid cancer were higher in patients with GD than in euthyroid patients [13,14,15]. Pellegriti et al. reported that the cumulative risk for recurrent thyroid cancer was approximately three times higher in patients with GD than in euthyroid patients [13]. On the contrary, other studies demonstrated that thyroid cancer in patients with GD had an excellent prognosis and longer disease-free survival [16, 17]. These inconsistent results are because of, at least in part, limited number of patients or unadjusted clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, some studies included occult thyroid cancer after thyroidectomy, which had little impact to the recurrence.

This study therefore investigated the recurrence rates of non-occult PTC in patients with GD and compared them with the rates in matched euthyroid patients.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB No. 2019-10-039-001), and the need for written informed consent was waived. Between January 2006 and June 2014, 3628 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma underwent total thyroidectomy. In all patients, thyroid nodules were detected prior to surgery, and fine needle aspiration was preoperatively performed for suspicious nodules. We excluded cases of occult thyroid cancer, which was occasionally found at histologic exam after surgery. Of those 3628 patients, 114 non-occult cases with concomitant GD were included in the present study. All patients underwent neck ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography preoperatively to evaluate tumor location and cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis. Patients with suspicious LN enlargement performed therapeutic LN dissection in addition to total thyroidectomy.

Data pertaining to patient age, sex, body mass index, and pathological features, including tumor size, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), resection margin involvement, and LN metastasis were collected. Follow-up duration and recurrence status were also recorded. The primary outcome measure was the rate of recurrences.

Postoperative management and follow-up

All patients underwent thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy. Radioactive iodine treatment was considered in patients with high risk for recurrence (incomplete tumor resection, gross ETE, or distant metastases). Follow-up evaluations, including physical examination, neck ultrasound, serum thyroglobulin, and thyroglobulin antibodies, were performed at intervals of 6–12 months.

Statistical analysis

To reduce potential confounding effects and selection bias, we conducted 1:5 propensity score matching. We selected the following eight factors which could affect recurrence: age, sex, tumor size, ETE, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, resection margin involvement, and LN metastasis.

SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Continuous data were compared using Student’s t test. Comparisons of categorical data were performed with the chi-squared test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed by using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between recurrence and prognostic factors. Statistical significance was determined using a p value of < 0.05 as the threshold.

Results

Characteristics of the patients with GD

The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up period of patients with GD was 94.1 months [interquartile range (IQR), 69.3–118.8 months]. Thyroid cancer showed lower rate of lymphatic invasion (1.8% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.037) and microscopic resection margin involvement (0.9% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.024) in patients with GD than in patients without GD. Patient with GD also showed lower rate of LN metastasis (29.8% vs. 37.3%; p = 0.001). Distant metastasis was not found in all patients. There was no significant difference in sex, age, tumor size, presence of ETE, and AJCC 7th TNM classification.

Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological features between patients with and without Graves’ disease
Full size table

Comparison of the recurrences rates

Recurrence was found in one patient (0.9%) in GD group, and 67 patients (2.7%) without GD developed recurrence (p = 0.487) including five patients with distant metastasis, respectively. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed no difference; the 5-year RFS for patients with GD was comparable with those without GD (100.0% vs. 97.5%, p = 0.246; Fig. 1a). To control the differences of baseline characteristics, patients with GD were 1:5 propensity matched to yield 114 matched pairs of 684 patients. Table 2 showed the clinicopathological comparison between the GD group versus the matched patients in euthyroid state without GD. The matched cohorts did not differ in terms of pathological features including tumor size, ETE, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, resection margin involvement, and LN metastasis. After adjustment of possible confounders, the overall recurrence rates did not significantly differ between groups (0.9% in GD group vs. 1.6% in matched control group; p = 0.557), during the median follow-up of 94.1 months (interquartile ratio 69.3–118.8 months, p = 0.894 between groups). The 5-year RFS was also comparable between the matched groups (100.0% vs. 98.4%, p = 0.572; Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Recurrence-free survival for patients with or without Graves’ disease. a Recurrence-free survival before matching. b Recurrence-free survival after 1:5 matching

Full size image
Table 2 Patient demographics and pathologic features after propensity-score matching
Full size table

Predictive factors of recurrence

Univariate Cox-proportional hazard analysis showed that ETE (hazard ratio [HR] for microscopic ETE 3.146, p = 0.001; HR for gross ETE 10.22, p < 0.001), lymphatic invasion (HR 5.520, p < 0.001), vascular invasion (HR 4.990, p = 0.002), resection margin involvement (HR 2.238, p = 0.019), LN metastasis (HR for N1a 3.331, p = 0.003; HR for N1b 22.76, p < 0.001), and 131I remnant ablation (HR 4.858, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of recurrence (Table 3). Multivariate analysis showed that both tumor size (HR 1.585, p < 0.001) and LN metastasis (HR for N1a 3.067, p = 0.023; HR for N1b 15.65, p < 0.001) were independently associated with recurrence. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that GD was not a predictive factor of the recurrence of thyroid cancer.

Table 3 Predictive factors for recurrence-free survival
Full size table

Discussion

This study demonstrated that GD did not affect the prognosis of the patients with PTC. From the 1990s, GD has been believed to be associated with aggressive thyroid cancer [18, 19]. High serum levels of TSAbs from GD can stimulate growth and metastasis of thyroid cancer [20,21,22]. Chronic abnormal stimulation by TSAbs may lead to more aggressiveness of thyroid cancer in patients with GD [22]. However, recent studies indicated that humoral immune response triggered by GD was protective against thyroid cancer [23]. Increased concentration of activated NK cells or M1 macrophage provided tumor-protective immunity, which resulted in less aggressive thyroid cancer. Yoshioka et al. further indicated that immunologic remission of TSAbs could be obtained by surgery, which eliminated the deleterious effect of TSAbs [24].

In the present study, 5-year RFS of PTC in patients with GD was comparable, at least not bad, to that in euthyroid patients (100% vs. 99.6%, p = 0.516). Kikuchi et al. suggested two possible mechanisms for the good prognosis of thyroid cancer with GD [16]. First, the size of thyroid cancer was relatively small due to thyroid hypertrophy, which would make it difficult to invade thyroid capsule or adjacent organs. The other mechanism was that attentive surgical procedure in Graves’ disease led to lesser remnant thyroid tissue. We also found that patients with GD showed lower rate of margin involvement (0.9% vs 5.8%, p = 0.024) and comparable rate of ETE (48.2% vs 52.7%, p = 0.317) to those without GD, respectively. A lower rate of LN metastasis (29.8% vs 37.3%, p = 0.001) in patients with GD further contributed to the good prognosis in our study.

Both tumor size (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.24–2.01) and LN metastasis (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.09–5.66) were predictive factors for recurrence in the present study, while GD (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.15–8.34) was not associated with the recurrence. Tumor size has been recognized as a predictive factor for recurrence in various risk stratification system, including AGES, AMGES, and MACIS score [25]. LN metastasis also has been widely described as a risk factor for recurrence [26,27,28]. A recent meta-analysis further demonstrated that tumor size over 2 cm (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.06–3.50) or LN metastasis (OR 3.24, 95% CI 2.61–4.02) significantly increased the risk of recurrence [29]. Recent research from Medas et al. indicated that both LN metastasis and large tumor size were independent predictors of recurrences as well [28]. The result of our study is consistent with previous reports.

There is no consensus or recommended protocol for detection of thyroid cancer in patients with GD, although GD is associated with higher risk of PTC [30]. Thyroid USG can identify more thyroid nodules or cancers in patients with GD, compared with palpation or radioactive iodine scintigraphy [30]. Routine USG for screening could result in the higher detection rate of small PTCs [31]. Some studies, therefore, illustrated that patients with GD tended to have microcarcinomas, which had little impact on recurrence [32]. Conversely, other researchers emphasized that patients with GD needed early detection and aggressive treatment of thyroid cancer [13]. In my institution, annual thyroid USG was recommended to all patients with GD. Annual USG may facilitate early diagnosis of PTC, which can further decrease the risk of recurrence.

This study has some limitations. First, all patients in the GD group underwent thyroidectomy due to concomitant thyroid cancer, although they had well controlled GD. Therefore, the influence of GD on recurrence may have been underestimated. Second, the effect of thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies was not investigated in the present study because there was only one recurrence in patients with GD. Third, we did not evaluate long-term prognosis including mortality. During the follow-up period of 7.8 years, there was no cancer-related death in our cohort. Further validation study in larger cohort is warranted.

Conclusion

PTC in patients with GD showed excellent prognosis and disease-free survival rates comparable to those of patients with euthyroid states. Thyroid cancer in patients with GD is not more aggressive than in euthyroid patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ETE:

Extrathyroidal extension

GD:

Graves’ disease

HR:

Hazard ratio

IQR:

Interquartile range

LN:

Lymph node

PTC:

Papillary thyroid carcinoma

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

TSAbs:

Thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies

References

  1. Smith TJ, Hegedus L. Graves’ disease. N Eng J Med. 2016;375:1552–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies TF, Andersen S, Latif R, Nagayama Y, Barbesino G, Brito M, et al. Graves’ disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt F, Thvilum M, Almind D, Christensen K, Green A, Hegedus L, et al. Morbidity before and after the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism: a nationwide register-based study. Plos One. 2013;8:e66711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Staniforth JU, Erdirimanne S, Eslick GD. Thyroid carcinoma in Graves’ disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;27:118–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee J, Nam KH, Chung WY, Soh EY, Park CS. Clinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients with concurrent Graves’ disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23:796–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pazaitou-Panayiotou K, Michalakis K, Paschke R. Thyroid cancer in patients with hyperthyroidism. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44:255–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriele R, Letizia C, Borghese M, De Toma G, Celi M, Izzo L, et al. Thyroid cancer in patients with hyperthyroidism. Horm Res. 2003;60:79–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrari SM, Fallahi P, Elia G, Ragusa F, Ruffilli I, Paparo SR, et al. Thyroid autoimmune disorders and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;64:135–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber KJ, Solorzano CC, Lee JK, Gaffud MJ, Prinz RA. Thyroidectomy remains an effective treatment option for Graves’ disease. Am J Surg. 2006;191:400–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keskin C, Sahin M, Hasanov R, Aydogan BI, Demir O, Emral R, et al. Frequency of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer in thyroidectomized patients with Graves’ disease. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16:302–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shu X, Ji J, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Hemminki K. Cancer risk in patients hospitalised for Graves’ disease: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1397–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen YK, Lin CL, Chang YJ, Cheng FT, Peng CL, Sung FC, et al. Cancer risk in patients with Graves’ disease: a nationwide cohort study. Thyroid. 2013;23:879–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pellegriti G, Mannarino C, Russo M, Terranova R, Marturano I, Vigneri R, et al. Increased mortality in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer associated with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1014–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Menon R, Nair CG, Babu M, Jacob P, Krishna GP. The outcome of papillary thyroid cancer associated with Graves’ disease: a case control study. J Thyroid Res. 2018;2018:8253094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cappelli C, Braga M, De Martino E, Castellano M, Gandossi E, Agosti B, et al. Outcome of patients surgically treated for various forms of hyperthyroidism with differentiated thyroid cancer: experience at an endocrine center in Italy. Surg Today. 2006;36:125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kikuchi S, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Uchino S, Kawamoto H. Prognosis of small thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease. Br J Surg. 2006;93:434–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yano Y, Shibuya H, Kitagawa W, Nagahama M, Sugino K, Ito K, et al. Recent outcome of Graves’ disease patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157:325–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim WB, Han SM, Kim TY, Nam-Goong IS, Gong G, Lee HK, et al. Ultrasonographic screening for detection of thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol. 2004;60:719–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. You E, Mascarella MA, Al Jassim A, Forest VI, Hier MP, Tamilia M, et al. Prevalence and aggressiveness of papillary thyroid carcinoma in surgically-treated Graves’ disease patients: a retrospective matched cohort study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morshed SA, Latif R, Davies TF. Characterization of thyrotropin receptor antibody-induced signaling cascades. Endocrinology. 2009;150:519–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Medas F, Erdas E, Canu GL, Longheu A, Pisano G, Tuveri M, et al. Does hyperthyroidism worsen prognosis of thyroid carcinoma? A retrospective analysis on 2820 consecutive thyroidectomies. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;47:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin CH, Chiang FY, Wang LF. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in hyperthyroidism treated by surgery. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003;19:379–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dias Lopes NM, Mendonca Lens HH, Armani A, Marinello PC, Cecchini AL. Thyroid cancer and thyroid autoimmune disease: a review of molecular aspects and clinical outcomes. Pathol Res Pract. 2020;216(9):153098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshioka W, Miyauchi A, Ito M, Kudo T, Tamai H, Nishihara E, et al. Kinetic analyses of changes in serum TSH receptor antibody values after total thyroidectomy in patients with Graves’ disease. Endocr J. 2016;63(2):179–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang BH, Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Staging systems for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a review and comparison. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):366–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward DL, et al. The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid. 2012;22:1144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Suh YJ, Kwon H, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Lee KE, Park YJ, et al. Factors affecting the locoregional recurrence of conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma after surgery: a retrospective analysis of 3381 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3543–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Medas F, Canu GL, Boi F, Lai ML, Erdas E, Calo PG. Predictive factors of recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis on 579 patients. Cancers. 2019;11:1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo K, Wang Z. Risk factors influencing the recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(9):5393–403.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, et al. 2016 American Thyroid Association guidelines for diagnosis and management of hyperthyroidism and other causes of thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016;26(10):1343–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Premoli P, Tanda ML, Piantanida E, Veronesi G, Gallo D, Masiello E, et al. Features and outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma associated with Graves’ disease: results of a large, retrospective, multicenter study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43(1):109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mekraksakit P, Rattanawong P, Karnchanasorn R, Kanitsoraphan C, Leelaviwat N, Poonsombudlert K, et al. Prognosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients with Graves’ disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract. 2019;25:1323–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (2017R1C1B5076977). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-Gu, Seoul, 07985, South Korea

    Hyungju Kwon & Byung-In Moon

Authors
  1. Hyungju Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Byung-In Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HK designed the study. HK collected the data. HK and BIM analyzed and interpreted the data. HK drafted the manuscript. BIM reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyungju Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB No. 2019-10-039-001), and the need for written informed consent was waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have no competing interests for this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Patient demographics and pathologic features after propensity-score matching using age, sex and tumor size

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, H., Moon, BI. Prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Surg Onc 18, 266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02044-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02044-x

Keywords

  • Graves’ disease
  • Papillary thyroid carcinoma
  • Recurrence
  • Prognosis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us