A single-center experience: management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors
World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 18, Article number: 202 (2020)
Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplasias. There are no internationally accepted standards to treat this complex oncological disease. The studies on which our knowledge is based frequently have methodological weaknesses. If the tumor is resectable, complete surgical excision is currently the first-line therapy. Thymic epithelial tumors respond to radiation. The therapeutic benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy depends on tumor stage. To validate and improve treatment, we share our current experiences with clinical management and surgical intervention.
This single-center retrospective study included 40 patients with primarily resectable thymic epithelial tumors who underwent resection with curative intent. The survival data was collected and presented according to Kaplan-Meier. Single- and multiple predictor survival analyses were carried out using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
Single-predictor survival analysis showed survival to be dependent on the Masaoka-Koga classification, WHO histological classification, resection status, surgical technique, and Clavien-Dindo grade for postoperative complications. Multiple predictor analysis confirms that the Masaoka-Koga stage (HR = 4.876, P = 0.032) and Clavien-Dindo grade (HR = 4.904, P = 0.011) are independent prognostic factors for survival.
In addition to the Masaoka stage, the occurrence of severe postoperative complications represents an independent prognostic factor. Given the tumor’s sensitivity to radiation, the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy can be considered to downstage Masaoka-Koga stages III and higher, thus reducing surgical risks. Further prospective multicenter studies are urgently needed.
Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplasias. The rate of incidence is 1.7 per million per year in Europe; in the USA, it is given as 1.3 to 2.7 per million per year . The disease most commonly appears between the ages of 50 and 60 . The 5-year survival rate is 30 to 60% for patients with thymic carcinoma . Due to its rarity, there are no internationally accepted standards or national guidelines for managing this complex oncological disease. Prospective studies are difficult owing to the infrequency of the disease. Current knowledge is based predominantly on small, retrospective single-center studies [4,5,6], or database analyses such as Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). These studies often have methodological weaknesses: for instance, important confounders, such as the severity of postoperative complications, are not systematically documented. In some cases, resection status and histological classification are recorded only subsequently. Also, the included cases have heterogeneous treatment modalities, could have taken place as long as up to 50 years ago, and do not take the interim progress in surgical interventions or radiotherapy into account [7,8,9].
The thymus is a primary lymphoepithelial organ. It plays a central role in the maturation of thymocytes into thymus lymphocytes (T cells). Histomorphologically, the thymus can be divided into the cortex and medulla. In the cortex and medulla, finely branched epithelial cells connect with each other to form a three-dimensional network that surrounds the thymocytes. Over the course of maturation, the thymocytes migrate from the cortex to the medulla. The numerous lobes of the thymus are contained by a delicate, connective tissue-like capsule. After puberty, the specialized thymus tissue is replaced by fatty tissue, although the residual thymus tissue continues to remain indefinitely .
Thymomas originate from the epithelial cells of the thymus. Thirty to 40% of patients with thymoma develop symptoms of myasthenia gravis. Clinical signs entail drooping eyelids, double vision, and rapid exhaustion. Conversely, only five to 15% of all patients with myasthenia gravis have thymomas. In contrast to thymoma, there are practically never clinical signs of myasthenia gravis in the case of thymic carcinoma .
Transcapsular invasion is used as a criterion to differentiate histologically between thymoma and thymic carcinoma. In 1981, Masaoka et al. stated that the clinical course depends on the invasion of the capsule and the surrounding structures as well as pleural, pericardial, lymphogenous, and hematogenous metastases . This led to the definition of four stages, which were then specified even further by Koga et al. in 1994 . This staging system is currently recommended by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group to classify patients. It is the one most often used worldwide (Table 1) [14, 15]. No less established in clinical practice is the World Health Organization (WHO) histological classification. Marx et al. validated six subtypes based on tumor morphology and the ratio of lymphocytes to epithelial cells (Table 2) .
The disease is often detected late if no typical signs of myasthenia are present. Among the symptoms are localized feeling of pressure, retrosternal pain, and coughing. Large tumors can lead to superior vena cava syndrome. The phrenic nerve or the recurrent laryngeal nerve can be infiltrated and result in neurological deficiencies. The diagnostic standard is CT with contrast agent. Performing an MRI or PET-CT can make sense to determine resectability and exclude distant metastasis [17, 18]. No preoperative biopsy is required if the tumor is deemed to be fully resectable based on such imaging.
The recommended therapy for patients with a thymic epithelial tumor currently depends on whether the tumor appears to be resectable prior to surgery. If this is the case, complete excision is the primary therapy. Anatomically, the thymus is located in the anterior mediastinum. The ventral border is the sternum. Dorsally, the thymus is positioned on the pericardium, the aorta, the superior vena cava, and the brachiocephalic veins. An extended resection is required if the tumor has spread into these critical mediastinal structures or into the lung . If complete resection is not achievable, neoadjuvant therapy can be attempted to downstage or alternatively debulking surgery with subsequent adjuvant treatment [6, 20]. In terms of surgical techniques, minimally invasive procedures and conventional open surgery are available [21,22,23]. Minimally invasive techniques are limited by infiltrative tumor growth into adjacent organs; complete excision is always the outcome aimed for.
Thymic epithelial tumors are radio-sensitive , so if resection is incomplete, there is a clear indication for adjuvant radiotherapy. In the case of an R0 resection, the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy depends on tumor stage [7, 25]. There is consensus that adjuvant radiotherapy is worthwhile in patients with Masaoka-Koga stages III and higher, regardless of resection status. Palliative chemotherapy is indicated in the event of metastatic cancer. An optimal chemotherapy regimen has not yet been established [26, 27]. Usually, a combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide is used [1, 28]. The molecular basis of this cancer is only rudimentarily understood. Targeted therapies are the subject of current studies .
Given this problematic context, it is absolutely necessary to report current experiences and survival data regarding these rare tumor entities and, in doing so, to contribute to validating and developing our current therapeutic approach.
The retrospective study included 40 patients with primarily resectable thymic epithelial tumor who underwent resection with curative intent between 2004 and 2018 at the Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf. None of the patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The tumor stage was identified according to Masaoka-Koga . Tumor histopathology was classified in compliance with WHO . Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo (Table 3) . The overall survival (OS) was computed as the time period from the date of surgery to either the date of death or last follow-up, whichever occurred first. Events considered for survival analysis were death due to cancer diagnosis. If no event was recorded, the patients were censored at the last contact for statistical evaluation. The median follow-up period for the patient group was 70.5 months. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Board in Hamburg, Germany. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS®) for Mac (Version 25) (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient baseline characteristics. The chi-square test was used for correlation between discrete variables. Survival curves for the overall survival of the patients were plotted (Kaplan-Meier method) and analyzed by implementing the log-rank test as a single-predictor model. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed as a multiple predictor model of survival. The interactions between the time measure and the covariates were tested in the multiple predictor model. None of the covariates was time-dependent (P > 0.05). Therefore, the proportional hazard assumption was confirmed. Statements of significance refer to P values of two-tailed tests that were less than 0.05.
The study population consisted of 26 (65%) women and 14 (35%) men. The median age was 55.2 years (range 30–85). The 5-year survival for all included patients was 70.5%. The included patients had the following Masaoka-Koga stages: stage I, 10 (27%); stage IIa, 14 (37.8%); stage IIb, 1 (2.7%); stage IVa, 5 (12.5%); and IVb, 3 (7.5%). Pleural and/or pericardial metastases of the tumor were seen in stage IVa patients. In patients with stage IVb, there was tumor infiltration of the lymph nodes, lungs, and/or heart. All included patients underwent resection with curative intent. An R0 resection was achieved in 27 (67.5%) patients. Half of the included patients underwent minimally invasive surgery, while open surgery was selected for the remaining patients. In 11 (27.5%) patients, there was an R1 situation, and in two (5 %) patients an R2 situation. The postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo: grade I, 18 (45%); grade II, 10 (25%): grade IIIa, 4 (10%); grade IIIb, 5 (12.5%); grade IVa, 2 (5%); and grade V, 1 (2.5%). One patient died during the postoperative hospital stay. The postoperative complications are listed in detail in Table 4. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 15 (37.5%) patients. The total dose varied between 50 and 60 Gy. Eight (20%) of the included patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Four (10%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Single-predictor survival analysis
The results of the single-predictor survival analysis are summarized in Table 5. Gender and age exert no influence on survival. Classification according to Masaoka-Koga enables a sufficient stratification of survival (P < 0.001, Fig. 1). Patients with WHO histologic description B3 (well-differentiated thymic carcinoma) or C tumor (thymic carcinoma) show poorer survival than patients in the other groups: A (medullary thymoma), AB (mixed thymoma), B1 (predominantly cortical thymoma), and B2 (cortical thymoma) (P = 0.007). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery have better survival than patients who underwent conventional open surgery (P = 0.001). Patients with an advanced Masaoka-Koga stage more often underwent open surgery (P = 0.033, Table 6).
Resection status correlates with survival. Patients with incomplete tumor resection show poorer survival (P = 0.012, Fig. 2). Comparing the survival of patients with R0 and R1 resection only, excluding patients with R2 resection, a better survival for patients with R0 resection can be confirmed (P = 0.032). There is a highly significant correlation between the postoperative complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo and survival. Severe complications, particularly grade IIIb (intervention under general anesthesia), are accompanied long term by a distinctly reduced survival (Fig. 3). Severe complications occur more often if open surgery had been performed (P = 0.018, Table 6).
Patients who received postoperative radiotherapy show no significant difference in survival in comparison to patients who received none (P = 0.578). More advanced Masaoka-Koga stages were more frequent in the group of patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.019, Table 6). Chemotherapy was more often carried out if there was an advanced Masaoka-Koga stage (P < 0.001, Table 6). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy show significantly poorer survival (P = 0.001, Table 5). Incomplete resection was present in 88% of the patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001, Table 6).
Multiple predictor survival analysis
Multiple predictor survival analysis looks at the parameters of the Masaoka-Koga stage (I + II vs. III + IV), complete resection (yes vs. no), Clavien-Dindo grade (I–IIIa vs. IIIb–IV) and adjuvant chemotherapy (no vs. yes). With an HR of 4.876 [95% Cl 1.145; 20.775], the Masaoka-Koga stage is an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.032). Hence, the risk of death for patients with the advanced Masaoka-Koga stage increases 4.876-fold in comparison to patients with early diseases (Table 7). Likewise, the degree of severity of the postoperative complication stratified according to Clavien-Dindo shows itself to be an independent prognostic factor with an HR of 4.904 [95% Cl 1.447; 16.623] (P = 0.011). Thus, the risk of death for patients with severe complications increases 4.904-fold. No other included parameter attains significance (Table 7).
In the present study, we analyzed the treatment and survival of patients with thymic epithelial tumors taking relevant prognostic factors into account, including the severity of postoperative complications.
Classification according to the Masaoka-Koga staging system shows itself to be valid: the more advanced the Masaoka-Koga stage, the poorer the survival. The multiple predictor analysis confirmed the Masaoka-Koga stage as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 4.876 [95% Cl 1.145; 20.775], P = 0.032). This corroborates the literature in which the Masaoka-Koga stage is established as a suitable parameter for estimating the prognosis [3, 30, 31]. Likewise, the diagnostically complex WHO histologic description can be confirmed by the single-predictor analysis as a prognostic factor for survival. Patients with incomplete tumor resection show a poorer survival, which is consistent with many studies . Gender has no influence on survival. Weksler et al. report that gender is a prognostic factor; however, this cannot be confirmed based on the data presented here .
The multiple predictor analysis of our study shows that a complication corresponding to Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher is an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR = 4.904 [95% Cl 1.447; 16.623], P = 0.011). Severe complications occurred significantly more often if an open surgery was performed. This type of operation was more frequently necessary in the advanced Masaoka-Koga stages . In the context of other surgical procedures, e.g., colectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy, the impact of postoperative complications on survival has already been demonstrated . However, studies on which current treatment of thymic epithelial tumors is based have not investigated the influence of postoperative complications on long-term survival [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Consequently, the severity of postoperative complications must be considered in future prospective studies.
Thymic epithelial tumors are radio-sensitive . In the event of incomplete tumor excision, there is a clear indication for adjuvant radiotherapy. Consensus exists on the performance of adjuvant radiotherapy for the Masaoka-Koga stages III and higher, regardless of resection status. Patients in this study who received adjuvant radiotherapy showed no difference in survival compared to those who received none. It must be noted here that patients who did receive radiation had a significantly more advanced Masaoka-Koga stage (P = 0.019, Table 6). Thus, it can be assumed that adjuvant radiotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with the advanced Masaoka-Koga stages. Ahmad et al. demonstrated that the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy depends on tumor stage [7, 25]. Due to the rarity of the investigated tumor entity, the number of patients included in this study is too small for subgroup analysis according to the Masaoka-Koga stage. Besides, the small number of patients results in relatively wide confidence intervals of the hazard ratios. The resulting statistical uncertainty is, along with the retrospective nature, a limitation of this study.
The postoperative course in patients with an advanced Masaoka-Koga stage (stages III–IV) is more often characterized by severe complications resulting from the necessarily more extensive surgery. In the multiple predictor analysis, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb) represent an independent prognostic factor for survival. Future studies must, therefore, systematically document complications that occur following surgery. The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy can be confirmed by these study findings. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for Masaoka-Koga stage III and higher could initially lead to downstaging and increase the probability of complete resection using minimally invasive procedures, thereby reducing the extent of resection. Consequently, the frequency of severe postoperative complications and the accompanying disadvantage to survival could be reduced. Initial studies by Lucchi et al. and Korst et al., who have already tested this hypothesis, demonstrate the feasibility of this therapeutic strategy [20, 34]. Twenty-two patients were included in the prospective multicentric study by Korst et al. In that study, 11 of the 22 patients were in regression after undergoing neoadjuvant therapy with a consecutive high percentage of complete resections. Our data support that additional prospective multicenter studies are urgently needed to evaluate this therapeutic approach, which, due to the rarity of this disease, can only be realized as multicentric studies.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Surveillance epidemiology and end results
National cancer data base
- T cells:
World health organization
Magnetic resonance imaging
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography
Statistical package for social sciences
Scorsetti M, Leo F, Trama A, D’Angelillo R, Serpico D, Macerelli M, et al. Thymoma and thymic carcinomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;99:332–50.
Benjamin DJ, Klapheke A, Lara PN, Cress RD, Riess JW. A population-based study of incidence and survival of 1588 thymic malignancies: results from the California Cancer Registry. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20(6):477–83.
Weksler B, Dhupar R, Parikh V, Nason KS, Pennathur A, Ferson PF. Thymic carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of factors predictive of survival in 290 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;95:299–303.
Lindenmann J, Fink-Neuboeck N, Pichler M, Anegg U, Maier A, Smolle J, et al. Stage-based treatment for thymoma in due consideration of thymectomy: a single-center experience and comparison with the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:303.
Song Z, Zhang Y. Outcomes after surgical resection of thymic carcinoma: a study from a single tertiary referral centre. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1523–7.
Tseng Y-H, Lin Y-H, Tseng Y-C, Lee Y-C, Wu Y-C, Hsu W-H, et al. Adjuvant therapy for thymic carcinoma – a decade of experience in a Taiwan National Teaching Hospital. Heymann D, editor PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146609–10.
Ahmad U, Yao X, Detterbeck F, et al. Thymic carcinoma outcomes and prognosis: results of an international analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:95–101.e2.
Patel S, Macdonald OK, Nagda S, Bittner N, Suntharalingam M. Evaluation of the role of radiation therapy in the management of malignant thymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1797–801.
Fernandes AT, Shinohara ET, Guo M, Mitra N, Wilson LD, Rengan R, et al. The role of radiation therapy in malignant thymoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1454–60.
Schünke M, Schulte E, Schumacher U, Voll M, Wesker KH. PROMETHEUS Innere Organe. 2018;.
Detterbeck FC, Parsons AM. Thymic tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1860–9.
Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer. 1981;48:2485–92.
Koga K, Matsuno Y, Noguchi M, Mukai K, Asamura H, Goya T, et al. A review of 79 thymomas: modification of staging system and reappraisal of conventional division into invasive and non-invasive thymoma. Pathol Int. 2008;44:359–67.
Detterbeck FC, Nicholson AG, Kondo K, Schil PV, Moran C. The Masaoka-Koga stage classification for thymic malignancies: clarification and definition of terms. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:S1710–6.
Kondo K, Monden Y. Therapy for thymic epithelial tumors: a clinical study of 1,320 patients from Japan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:878–84.
Marx A, Ströbel P, Badve SS, Chalabreysse L, Chan JKC, Chen G, et al. ITMIG consensus statement on the use of the WHO histological classification of thymoma and thymic carcinoma: refined definitions, histological criteria, and reporting. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:596–611.
Marom EM. Advances in thymoma imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2013;28:69–80 quiz 81–3.
Razek AAKA, Khairy M, Nada N. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in thymic epithelial tumors: correlation with World Health Organization classification and clinical staging. Radiology. 2014;273:268–75.
Wright CD. Extended resections for thymic malignancies. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:S344–7.
Lucchi M, Melfi F, Dini P, Basolo F, Viti A, Givigliano F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III and IVA thymomas: a single-institution experience with a long follow-up. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:308–13.
Toker A, Sonett J, Zielinski M, Rea F, Tomulescu V, Detterbeck FC. Standard terms, definitions, and policies for minimally invasive resection of thymoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:S1739–42.
Pennathur A, Qureshi I, Schuchert MJ, Dhupar R, Ferson PF, Gooding WE, et al. Comparison of surgical techniques for early-stage thymoma: feasibility of minimally invasive thymectomy and comparison with open resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:694–701.
Kimura T, Inoue M, Kadota Y, Shiono H, Shintani Y, Nakagiri T, et al. The oncological feasibility and limitations of video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymomas. Eur J Cardiol. 2013;44:e214–8.
Onuki T, Ishikawa S, Yamamoto T, Ito H, Sakai M, Onizuka M, et al. Pathologic radioresponse of preoperatively irradiated invasive thymomas. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:270–6.
Ruffini E, Detterbeck F, Van Raemdonck D, et al. Thymic carcinoma: a cohort study of patients from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:541–8.
Attaran S, McCormack D, Pilling J, Harrison-Phipps K. Which stages of thymoma benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy post-thymectomy? Interact Cardiov Th. 2012;15:273–5.
Okuma Y, Hosomi Y, Takagi Y, Sasaki E, Hishima T, Maeda Y, et al. Clinical outcomes with chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2013;80:75–80.
Evans TL, Lynch TJ. Role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced thymic tumors. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;17:41–50.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Hosaka Y, Tsuchida M, Toyabe S, Umezu H, Eimoto T, Hayashi J. Masaoka stage and histologic grade predict prognosis in patients with thymic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:912–7.
Lee CY, Bae MK, Park IK, Kim DJ, Lee JG, Chung KY. Early Masaoka stage and complete resection is important for prognosis of thymic carcinoma: a 20-year experience at a single institution. European J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2009;36:159–62 discussion 163.
Weissferdt A, Moran CA. Thymic Carcinoma, Part 1. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138:103–14.
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;123:32–48.
Korst RJ, Bezjak A, Blackmon S, Choi N, Fidias P, Liu G, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced thymic tumors: a phase II, multi-institutional clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:36–46.e1.
Open access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Board in Hamburg, Germany. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kemper, M., Moradzadeh, M., Bellon, E. et al. A single-center experience: management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors. World J Surg Onc 18, 202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01988-4