- Open Access
Joint-preserving palliative surgery using self-locking screws of intramedullary nail and percutaneous cementoplasty for proximal humeral metastasis in the advanced cancer patients
World Journal of Surgical Oncologyvolume 16, Article number: 93 (2018)
We introduced a palliative joint-preserving surgery using proximal self-locking screws of intramedullary (IM) nail and percutaneous cementoplasty (PC) in patients with proximal humeral metastases, including the head and neck, and evaluated the outcome of the surgical method.
Twenty-three patients (mean age = 63.0 ± 11.8 years, M:F = 14:9) had IM nailing with a self-locking screw system and PC for the treatment of humeral head and neck metastases. Usually, three proximal locking screws were inserted after IM nailing, and 20.9 ± 8.0 ml of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was injected in the perimetal osteolytic area.
Regional anesthesia with interscalene block was performed in 87.0% (20/23), and the duration of surgery (from anesthesia to awakening) was approximately 40–55 min. Red blood cell was not transfused intra- and/or postoperatively in 65.2% (15/23). The localized preoperative pain (visual analog scale (VAS), 8.2 ± 3.1) was gradually decreased at postoperative 1 week (VAS, 4.9 ± 2.1) and at 6 weeks (VAS, 2.9 ± 2.1) (P < 0.001). Among nine patients who underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT, the proximal humeral metastasis around PC showed improved, stable, and aggravated states in five (55.6%), three (33.3%), and one patient (11.1%), respectively. Meanwhile, 88.8% (8/9) of patients showed aggravation at the naive bone metastasis area.
The selection of the self-locking screw type of the IM nail and PC was helpful in preventing fixation failure for joint-preserving palliative surgery in the proximal humeral metastasis.
The management of humerus metastasis is to alleviate patients’ symptoms and maintain function, and surgical approach has benefits by reducing local pain and early mobilization [1, 2]. Intramedullary (IM) nail fixation is the main treatment for long bone and humeral metastases [3,4,5]. However, obtaining a successful result for the proximal humeral metastasis is difficult, because the possibility of fixation failure is high in IM nail fixation, and the risk of open surgery and tumor progression is high in plate fixation. Hence, joint replacement surgery after marginal or wide excision was mainly performed in the proximal part of the humerus .
The self-locking screw type of the IM nail had been introduced for surgical treatment of proximal femoral fracture. The gamma nail has the locking mechanism between an IM nail and screws, which lowers the possibility of loosening in osteoporotic bones . For the proximal humerus, the self-locking screw type of the IM nail (Trigen Humeral Nail; Smith and Nephew, USA) has been introduced to inhibit loosening failure of osteoporotic bone . There is a unique thread inside the hole to make a locking mechanism between the IM nail and proximal screws. Theoretically, when osteolysis progresses postoperatively, loosening would not occur in the proximal part of the humerus due to the self-locking mechanism between the IM nail and screws.
The percutaneous cementoplasty (PC) of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is a useful method for metastatic bone disease [9, 10]. By PC, patients achieved good pain relief and early function recovery of the extremities [10, 11]. However, PC alone is not sufficient for maintaining long bone strength against pathologic fracture . Recently, PC is combined with flexible or rigid IM nail for long bone metastasis [9, 13, 14] or hollow perforated screws for femur neck metastasis [15, 16] and showed durable stability and effective local tumor suppression.
We hypothesized that proximal self-locking screw insertion of an IM nail and combination with PC can be useful for salvaging the shoulder joint in the humeral head and neck metastasis as a palliative minimally invasive surgery.
Among 122 patients who underwent humeral metastasis surgery between July 2012 and May 2015, 98 patients whose metastatic area was the proximal humerus were retrospectively reviewed. In the proximal humerus, surgical treatment for bone metastasis was performed mainly in patients with impending/pathologic fractures by osteolytic bone metastasis. For patients with osteoblastic bone metastasis, surgical treatments were performed by other methods than self-locking type IM nailing, because mechanical failure risk was expected low. Among patients who underwent surgical treatment for the proximal humerus metastasis, 23 patients underwent rigid IM nailing with the self-locking screw type to stabilize the proximal humerus. In our institute, PMMA was routinely used for osteolytic long bone metastasis after metal fixation since 2008. For 23 patients in final analysis, all patients had osteolytic bone metastasis in the proximal humerus and PC was used as combined treatment.
All patients met the criteria of the Mirel score of > 9 for humeral metastasis . The primary malignancies were the lungs, kidney, liver, breast, prostate, multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and salivary gland in eight patients, four patients, three patients, two patients, two patients, two patients, one patient, and one patient, respectively.
All patients were positioned supine with head slightly up. We used the deltoid-splitting approach, and the supraspinatus tendon was divided sharply using a knife for easy repair after nail insertion. The entry point was created just medial to the supraspinatus tendon insertion in the anteroposterior view and was centered in the lateral view. We selected the smallest diameter with measured length of the nail and assembled it before proximal reaming. Through the entry hole in the proximal humerus, the self-locking screw type of the humeral IM nail (Trigen Humeral Nail; Smith and Nephew, USA) was inserted according to the usual proximal humeral IM nail method. Three 4.5-mm proximal locking screws were inserted using a targeting device. Distal locking screw fixation was optional. After targeting device removal, fluoroscopic check of the nail insertion and fixation of the proximal self-locking screws was performed (Fig. 1a, b).
For PC, a percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) needle (10 gauge, 11 cm; poverty needle; Kyungwon Medical, Seoul, Korea) was inserted into the medullary cavity by hand-pushing or hammering in a percutaneous and transcortical manner. Additional PV needles were inserted in cases of long intramedullary or skipped lesions. The entry point of the needle was selected at the most easily accessible area to the lesion, which was apart from the neurovascular bundles. After identifying the location of the PV needle by fluoroscopy, the low-viscosity radiopaque PMMA (Depuy International Ltd., Blackpool, UK) was mixed for 2 min and transferred to a 30- or 50-ml syringe, depending on the number of cement pack (20 g/pack). Subsequently, PMMA was transferred again into 18 to 20 1-ml syringes/pack and injected 3–4 min after mixing. The initial PMMA was slowly injected by checking venous drainage by monitoring using fluoroscopy and evaluating blood pressure. Bone cement was injected as much as possible, with frequent checking of the anesthetic monitor and fluoroscopy (Fig. 1c). The PV needle was removed before complete cement solidification, which was approximately 10–12 min after mixing.
The conventional treatment for bone metastasis, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy was decided by a multidisciplinary team approach of the hemato-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and orthopedic surgeons . The patients who were indicated adjuvant therapy were referred for adjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy without delay postoperatively because only stab wounds were made with our method.
Self-locking screw insertion of IM nail with PC result evaluation
The patients’ anesthesia method, duration of surgery, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, pain killer use, and complication were checked by reviewing the medical records. In addition, each patient was asked to quantify pain based on the numeric visual analog scale (VAS) with values from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (strongest pain ever experienced) a day before surgery and 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively . Postoperative bone destruction status was evaluated by plain radiography.
F-18-FDG PET/CT image acquisition and evaluation
To evaluate the patients’ tumor progression status, F-18-FDG PET/CT was evaluated in patients who performed before and after the self-locking screw insertion with PC. PET/CT was taken when needed from a multidisciplinary point of view for systemic assessment, and no case was taken for the purpose of tracking only bone metastasis. There were nine patients who had both preoperative and postoperative PET/CT. We evaluated the progressiveness of bone metastases in each individual patient between the proximal self-locking screw insertion of IM nail with PC area and other naive bone metastasis areas. PET/CT evaluation was grouped into three categories: improved, stable, and aggravated states. The improved state was defined as decreased extent and intensity of lesion uptake, the stable state was defined as no significant interval change, and the aggravated state was defined as increased extent and intensity of uptake or new metastatic lesion. In addition, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) calculated was acquired based on the following equation to quantify F-18-FDG uptake: SUV = (tissue radioactivity [Bq/ml])/(total injected activity [Bq]/body weight [g]).
The patients’ pain score changes (preoperative vs. postoperative 1 week vs. postoperative 6 weeks) were evaluated by repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. The statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSS 18.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
Patients’ baseline characteristics
Our study included 23 patients (mean age = 63.0 ± 11.8 years, range = 36–80 year; M:F = 14:9). The Mirel scores were 9 and 10 in 7 (30.4%) and 16 patients (69.6%), respectively. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy for the proximal humeral metastases were performed in 91.3% (21/23) and 95.7% (22/23) of the patients, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 6.3 ± 6.2 months (Table 1).
Clinical results of self-locking screw insertion with PC
Three proximal self-locking screw insertions and PC were successfully performed in all patients without major complication. The patients underwent regional and general anesthesia in 87.0% (20/23) and 13.0% (3/23), respectively. The injected cement amount was 20.9 ± 8.0 ml (range = 11–40 ml). The mean duration of surgery was approximately 40 min without distal locking screw insertion (with insertion = 55 min), and two packs (400 ml/pack) of RBC was transfused in 34.8% (8/23) of patients (no RBC transfusion in the remaining 15 patients). Distal locking screws were not inserted in nine patients (with insertion = 14 patients). Preoperative embolization in the nail insertion track was not performed in any of the patients. Postoperatively, good immediate structural stability was achieved in all patients (Fig. 2), and durability was achieved even when the adjacent bony structure was severely damaged (Fig. 3). Postoperative complication was merely transient delirium in 13.0% (3/23) of patients. At the final follow-up, one patient survived, 16 patients died of disease, and six patients were lost to follow-up (Table 2). The patients’ preoperative VAS was 8.2 ± 3.1. The patients’ pain was gradually decreased 1 week (VAS, 4.9 ± 2.1) and 6 weeks postoperatively (VAS, 2.9 ± 2.1) (P < 0.001; Fig. 4).
Bone destruction and tumor progression evaluation
Postoperative progressive bone destruction of the proximal humerus was found in 39.1% (9/23) of patients by simple pain radiography; however, the patient showed no screw back-out and fixation failure.
Of 23 patients, there were nine patients who were finally included for the evaluation of F-18-FDG PET/CT study. Preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT was performed 1.3 ± 0.6 months preoperatively, and postoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT was performed 2.7 ± 0.8 months postoperatively. Among them, the proximal humeral metastasis around PC showed improved, stable, and aggravated states in five (55.6%), three (33.3%), and one patient (11.1%), respectively. SUVmax change in self-locking screws with PC area was from 9.1 ± 3.0 to 7.6 ± 2.5. In contrast, the naive bone metastasis area demonstrated aggravated state in eight patients (88.9%) and improved state in one patient (11.1%). SUVmax changes of naive bone metastasis area were from 2.5 ± 0.8 to 6.1 ± 2.0 (Table 3 and Fig. 5).
The proximal self-locking screws of IM nail were helpful to maintain stability without loosening in severely damaged bone by metastasis. Furthermore, combined PC not only contributed to maintaining stability, but also helped suppress bone metastasis. In our study, no loosening and fixation failure occurred even in extensive osteolysis by self-locking screw insertion and PC.
Pain relief and pathological fracture prevention are important when treating patients with metastatic bone cancer. Closed intramedullary nailing is the most useful method for metastatic cancer of the long bone in the limbs . The IM nail with self-locked screws were initially introduced in proximal femur fractures and showed pain relief, function recovery, and decreased reoperation rate . Additional stability that was achieved by the locking mechanism between screws and an IM nail may also be useful for pathological fractures in long bones. However, because closed intramedullary nailing in the long bone does not remove tumor tissue, patients are at risk for progressive bone destruction due to intramedullary spreading of the tumor during medullary reaming or inserting of the nail. In order to overcome the disadvantages of closed intramedullary nailing, using a nail with the smallest diameter had some advantages when treating long bone metastasis to avoid reaming and pushing down the tumor to the distal marrow space. In addition, when PC is combined, a nail with the smallest diameter provides a sufficient space between the nail and cortical bone for injecting bone cement. Unlike the femur, a small-sized unreaming nail (8 mm) may be sufficient because the humerus is a non-weight-bearing bone. In this study, there were no patients who encountered mechanical failure in the proximal humerus. The distal locking screws were inserted in the patients with pathologic fractures of the distal one third of the proximal humerus or combined bone metastasis in the distal one third of the humerus. Nine patients (39.1%) had no distal locking screws, and the duration of surgery and radiation exposure by intraoperative fluoroscopy were reduced in these patients.
Combining PC while performing proximal self-locking screws of IM nail insertion has many advantages. First, intraoperative bone bleeding was stopped by bone cement injection, and postoperative bleeding was also reduced. Preoperative embolization procedure was not necessary even in bone metastasis of renal cell carcinoma which is a well-known hypervascular tumor. Second, because the bone cement fills the microfracture and the gap between an osteolytic bone and the nail, immediate fixation stability is improved, resulting in immediate pain relief. Third, combined PC influences local tumor suppression by inhibiting intramedullary tumor spreading. When PC was performed in the intramedullary area, the cement was distributed around the normal intramedullary area as well as osteolytic lesion . The blocking effect of nutrition and cytotoxic effect of the tumor was induced by cement and achieved tumor volume reduction and tumor necrosis . Because F-18-FDG PET/CT is a good imaging modality to detect bone metastasis , it can be used to identify the tumor suppression effect of the treatment . In the study, aggravation of metastasis around self-locking screws with the PC was found in only one case (11.1%), which implies effective tumor control. In contrast, other naive metastasis area showed increased uptake in most cases (88.9%), which means ineffective tumor control. The most worrisome complications during bone cement injection are fat and cement embolisms [24, 25]. In our study, no major complications, including fat or bone cement embolisms, occurred.
Our study has some limitations. The number of the patients was relatively small. In addition, because the patients had multiple factors associated with patients’ status, VAS pain score was difficult to evaluate at follow-up. Finally, radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy factors could be the confounding factor for exact evaluation. The influence of combined therapy and comparison with standard surgical technique should be performed in the future.
The self-locking screw insertion of IM nail with PC is a feasible procedure as a minimally invasive and joint-preserving surgery for proximal humeral metastasis of patients with advanced cancer.
Goodman MA, Weiss KR. Surgical approach to metastatic bone disease. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2014;24:85–90.
Sarahrudi K, Hora K, Heinz T, Millington S, Vécsei V. Treatment results of pathological fractures of the long bones: a retrospective analysis of 88 patients. Int Orthop. 2006;30:519–24.
Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Casadei R, Errani C, Angelini A, Calabrò T, et al. Protocol of surgical treatment of long bone pathological fractures. Injury. 2010;41:1161–7.
Eastley N, Newey M, Ashford RU. Skeletal metastases—the role of the orthopaedic and spinal surgeon. Surg Oncol. 2012;21:216–22.
Cappuccio M, Bandiera S, Babbi L, Boriani L, Corghi A, Amendola L, et al. Management of bone metastases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:407–14.
Lor RR. Metastatic bone disease: Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5662-9.
Zhang L, Shen J, Chen S, Wu Z, Huang Z, He S, et al. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with locking gamma nail (LGN): a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;26:12–7.
Liu QH, Sun W, Zhou JL, Ren XB, Lu T, Shan L, et al. A new approach for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures using the TRIGEN proximal humeral nail. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:467–74.
Kim JH, Kang HG, Kim JR, Lin PP, Kim HS. Minimally invasive surgery of humeral metastasis using flexible nails and cement in high-risk patients with advanced cancer. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e32–7.
Kim YI, Kang HG, Kim SK, Kim JH, Kim HS. Clinical outcome prediction of percutaneous cementoplasty for metastatic bone tumor using 18F-FDG PET-CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:916–23.
Cazzato RL, Palussière J, Buy X, Denaro V, Santini D, Tonini G, et al. Percutaneous long bone cementoplasty for palliation of malignant lesions of the limbs: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:1563–72.
Gangi A, Buy X. Percutaneous bone tumors management. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27:124–36.
Kim YI, Kang HG, Kim JH, Kim SK, Lin PP, Kim HS. Closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous cement augmentation for long bone metastases. Bone Joint J. 2016;98:703–9.
Kim YI, Kang HG, Kim TS, Kim SK, Kim JH, Kim HS. Palliative percutaneous stabilization of lower extremity for bone metastasis using flexible nails and bone cement. Surg Oncol. 2014;23:192–8.
Lin PP, Kang HG, Kim YI, Kim JH, Kim HS. Minimally invasive surgery for femoral neck fractures using bone cement infusible hollow-perforated screw in high-risk patients with advanced cancer. Surg Oncol. 2015;24:226–31.
Kang HG, Roh YW, Kim HS. The treatment of metastasis to the femoral neck using percutaneous hollow perforated screws with cement augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1078–82.
Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathological fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:256–64.
Mercadante S, Fulfaro F. Management of painful bone metastases. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:308–14.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117–26.
Arvinius C, Parra JL, Mateo LS, Maroto RG, Borrego AF, Stern LL. Benefits of early intramedullary nailing in femoral metastases. Int Orthop. 2014;38(1):129–32.
Matre K, Vinje T, Havelin LI, Gjertsen JE, Furnes O, Espehaug B, et al. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:200–8.
Uemura A, Matsusako M, Numaguchi Y, Oka M, Kobayashi N, Niinami C, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for hemorrhagic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:493–5.
Qu X, Huang X, Yan W, Wu L, Dai K. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET–CT, 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1007–15.
Wang LJ, Yang HL, Shi YX, Jiang WM, Chen L. Pulmonary cement embolism associated with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg. 2012;4(3):182–9.
Duran C, Sirvanci M, Aydogan M, Ozturk E, Ozturk C, Akman C. Pulmonary cement embolism: a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol. 2007;48(8):854–9.
This research was supported by a grant from the Research Driven Hospital R&D project, funded by the National Cancer Center.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (IRB; Surgical treatment of metastatic bone cancer: clinical and radiological evaluation, NCC2014-0215), and the study was performed according to the Helsinki Declaration guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from the patients prior to enrolling in the study.
Consent for publication
We obtained consent for publication from the patients.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.