Open Access

Identification of a novel germ-line mutation in the TP53 gene in a Mexican family with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

  • Lucia Taja-Chayeb1Email author,
  • Silvia Vidal-Millán1,
  • Olga Gutiérrez-Hernández1,
  • Catalina Trejo-Becerril1,
  • Enrique Pérez-Cárdenas1,
  • Alma Chávez-Blanco1,
  • Erick de la Cruz-Hernández1 and
  • Alfonso Dueñas-González1, 2
Contributed equally
World Journal of Surgical Oncology20097:97

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-7-97

Received: 31 August 2009

Accepted: 17 December 2009

Published: 17 December 2009

Abstract

Background

Germ-line mutations of the TP53 gene are known to cause Li-Fraumeni syndrome, an autosomal, dominantly inherited, high-penetrance cancer-predisposition syndrome characterized by the occurrence of a variety of cancers, mainly soft tissue sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinoma, leukemia, breast cancer, and brain tumors.

Methods

Mutation analysis was based on Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) screening of exons 2-11 of the TP53 gene, sequencing, and cloning of DNA obtained from peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Results

We report herein on Li Fraumeni syndrome in a family whose members are carriers of a novel TP53 gene mutation at exon 4. The mutation comprises an insertion/duplication of seven nucleotides affecting codon 110 and generating a new nucleotide sequence and a premature stop codon at position 150. With this mutation, the p53 protein that should be translated lacks the majority of the DNA binding domain.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this specific alteration has not been reported previously, but we believe it is the cause of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome in this family.

Background

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominantly inherited high-penetrance cancer-predisposition syndrome characterized by the occurrence of a variety of cancers in children and young adults. While the majority of cancer-predisposition syndromes are tissue-specific, such as those associated with breast cancer, colon cancer, and melanoma, LFS is associated with several different cancer types, mainly bone and soft tissue sarcoma, breast cancer, brain tumors, adrenocortical carcinoma, and leukemia [1, 2]. These cancers often appear at a young age and can occur several times throughout the life of an affected person. Approximately 70% of LFS families and 8-22% of families with LF like (LFL) carry germ-line mutations at the tumor suppressor gene TP53 [36]. The majority of missense alterations occur at evolutionarily conserved amino acid residues in the DNA binding domain [7]; outside of this core region, deleterious TP53 changes tend to be nonsense or frameshift mutations that cause premature protein-translation termination [810]. At present, 399 pathogenic germ-line mutations have been reported for TP53, 78% of which are missense mutations principally located at the sequence coding for the DNA binding domain [11]. Epidemiological studies estimate that approximately 70% of males and 100% of females who inherit a TP53 mutation are at increased risk for developing cancer of the breast, brain, soft tissue, bone, blood, and adrenal cortex [12].

In order to recognize the syndrome, the French LFS Working Group has developed practical criteria: The so-called Chompret criteria. These criteria integrate the following three different clinical situations suggestive of LFS: (a) a proband with a tumor belonging to the narrow LFS tumor spectrum (soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, brain tumor, pre-menopausal breast cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, leukemia, lung bronchioloalveolar carcinoma) prior to the age of 46 years and at least one first- or second-degree relative with LFS tumor (except for breast cancer if the proband is affected by breast cancer) before 56 years of age or with multiple tumors, or (b) a proband with multiple tumors (except multiple breast tumors), two of which belong to the LFS tumor spectrum and the first of which occurred prior to the age of 46 years, or (c) a proband with adrenocortical carcinoma or choroid plexus tumor, irrespective of family history [13, 14].

The TP53 tumor suppressor gene (chromosome 17p13) encodes a protein that participates in many overlapping cellular pathways that control cell proliferation and homeostasis, such as cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA repair. The p53 protein is a transcription factor constitutively expressed in the majority of cell types and activated in response to various stress signals (importantly, genotoxic stress) [15]. Loss of p53 function is thought to suppress a mechanism of protection against the accumulation of genetic alterations, as the mutant p53 protein is unable to carry out, i.e., transcriptional transactivation of downstream target genes that regulate the cell cycle and apoptosis. Somatic TP53 genetic alterations are found frequently in a variety of human sporadic cancers, with frequencies varying from 10-60%, depending on tumor type or population group [16, 17].

In this work, we describe a family with LFS syndrome with one novel TP53 germ-line mutation that corresponds to a 7 nucleotide insertion at exon 4, which generates a frameshift and a premature stop codon at position 150. Initially, the mutation was identified in a patient with breast cancer and was based on the pedigree from which the mutation derived from the paternal side, which was corroborated afterward. The mutation was also identified in one other family member (healthy at the moment of the study). These findings bear important implications for genetic counseling and possibly clinical management.

Patients and Methods

Family

The family studied is of Mexican origin. The index case was a 23-year-old female diagnosed with breast carcinoma of the left breast with combined histological features of lobular carcinoma and infiltrating ductal carcinoma. The family history suggested LFS: the patient's father was diagnosed with dorsal soft tissue leiomyosarcoma at the age of 67 years, and a half-sister (from the paternal side) died of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma at the age of 25 years. The patient's grandparents died of different causes, but none had cancer. These data were confirmed by clinical files and histopathological reports. Before the molecular analysis, the family received genetic counseling and signed informed consent. This protocol was approved by the local Ethical and Scientific Committees.

DNA extraction

DNA was obtained from 10 ml of peripheral blood leukocytes. Genomic DNA was extracted with the extraction kit Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to manufacturer instructions. DNAs were quantified spectrophotometrically and stored at -20°C.

Polymerase chain reaction

The oligonucleotides were designed to amplify the coding regions as well as the adjacent intronic sequences. Seven pairs of primers were used to amplify the entire TP53 gene as described by Loyant in 2005 [18]. The primer sequence for exon 4 was the following: Forward 5'GGT CCT CTG ACT GCT CTT TTC ACC-3', Reverse 5'-CAG GCA TTG AAG TCT CAT GGA AG-3'. The Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and sequence analysis were performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing 50 ng of DNA, 1 μmol/L of each primer (forward and reverse), 200 μmol/L dNTPs (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 0.25 U Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems™), and buffer 1× provided by the manufacturer. PCRs were performed in a 2400 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems). Amplifications were performed according to a touchdown protocol with initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and final extension at 72°C for 5 min, denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 56.5-49.5°C and decreasing 0.5°C per cycle for 14 cycles, followed by 16 cycles at 49.5°C; extension carried out at 72°C for 40 sec. Amplification was verified by gel electrophoresis.

DHPLC

After corroborating a correct amplification, PCR reactions were denatured at 95°C for 10 min and renatured by decreasing the temperature at a rate of 2°C per min to 25°C. Samples were analyzed in a DHPLC device (Transgenomics, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) according to temperature and elution conditions calculated by DHPLC software. Approximate time of analysis was 9 min per sample. Heterozygote profiles were identified by visual analysis of the chromatograms, comparing peak shapes with a wild-type sample.

Sequencing

Samples were sequenced to identify sequence change in samples with an aberrant DHPLC profile. PCR amplicons were purified utilizing isopropanol precipitation and then sequenced in both forward and reverse directions, from at least two independent amplification products. Purified DNA was diluted and cycle-sequenced employing the ABI BigDye Terminator kit v3.1 (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. Sequencing reactions were electrophoresed on an ABI3100 genetic analyzer. Electropherograms were analyzed in both sense and antisense direction for presence of mutations. The sequences obtained were compared with the reference TP53 (GenBank X54156). Results were compared with the following three databases: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) database; the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD), and the P53 Knowledgebase [11, 19, 20].

Cloning

To determine the precise site and sequence of the insertion, PCR products corresponding to exon 4 were cloned using the TOPO-TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing, (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer instructions. The product of the ligation reaction was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α by calcium precipitation and plated on Luria Bertani-agar plates and selected with 100 μg/ml of ampicillin. Twelve colonies were picked and grown in Luria Bertani media in the presence of ampicillin. Plasmid extraction was performed by the alkaline lysis method and purified for sequencing.

Results

TP53 Analysis

Based on clinical data, the family was diagnosed with LFS. The pedigree (Figure 1) suggested that individual II-5 might be the carrier of the de novo TP53 mutation because none of his ancestors had had cancer. The first family member studied was the index patient. We analyzed exons 2-11 by DHPLC and observed an abnormal chromatogram in exon 4 (Figure 2). Subsequent direct sequencing of the aberrant PCR product of exon 4 demonstrated a 7-nucleotide insertion. Further analysis of the sequence demonstrated that the insertion was, in fact, tandem duplication (c.329-330insGTTTCCG). This duplication generates a frameshift and a premature stop signal at codon 150 (Figure 3).
Figure 1

Pedigree of the studied family. Square symbols indicate males, round symbols indicate females, diamond symbols indicate individuals of unknown sex, line through symbol means deceased individual. Tumor type and age at diagnosis of the tumors are indicated below the individual identifiers. Sarc = sarcoma; LuC = lung cancer; Breast = breast cancer. * = mutation present; W = mutation absent.

Figure 2

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) analysis of TP53 exon 4. A. Wild-type chromatogram profile. B. Abnormal elution profile found for the proband. The X axis represent time of elution (retention time), while the Y axis indicates height of the peaks.

Figure 3

DNA sequence showing the insertion and cDNA sequence generated by the mutation. A. Sequence analysis of TP53 exon 4 for the index patient. Bold underlined indicates the duplicated sequence, below which the wild-type sequence is shown. B. Changes in the cDNA sequence: new cDNA sequence (bold) and generation of a premature stop codon (italics). The 7 nucleotide insertion is underlined.

Once the mutation was detected, we searched for the specific alteration in the index patient's father and two half-sisters (paternal side). This mutation was also detected in the father, as well as in patient III-1 (III-2 was wild-type). Additionally, we found that the proband and the two remaining mutated members were homozygous for the Arg >Pro polymorphism at codon 72. We must continue to seek the mutation in other family members; however, they have refused to participate in the study until the present.

Cloning of the mutated exon 4

To further characterize the mutation, we cloned the mutated PCR product into the pCR4-TOPO vector (TOPO-TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing, Invitrogen). We sequenced 12 clones and found the mutated allele in five clones. Sequence analysis revealed that the insertion indeed corresponded to GTTTCCG, disrupting codon 110, and inducing a frameshift and generation of a premature stop codon at position 150 (Figure 4). The GTTTCCG sequence corresponds to a duplication of the upstream GTTTCCG sequence.
Figure 4

Sequence of the cloned fragments. The upper sequence corresponds to the wild-type allele; the red bracket indicates the 7 nucleotide sequence that is duplicated. The lower sequence corresponds to the mutated allele, and the asterisk and red box indicates the inserted/duplicated sequence.

We searched for this mutation in three different databases: IARC database; P53 Knowledgebase, and HGMD [11, 19, 20] and found that this specific alteration has not been reported either as a germ-line or as somatic mutation.

Discussion

Identification of a germ-line TP53 mutation in a patient allows for the following a) to confirm the diagnosis of LFS on a molecular basis; b) to ensure regular clinical surveillance by an informed clinician in order to avoid a delay in diagnosis of a second tumor; c) to avoid radiation whenever possible, and d) to offer genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis to the families [21].

In this work, we presented the mutational analysis of a family with LFS in whom the tumor spectra reported, which suggested that family members could have LFS. Molecular analysis revealed an insertion/duplication of 7 nucleotides at exon 4. The mutation was detected in two affected relatives and in one healthy member. The GTTTCCG sequence was duplicated and inserted after the last G. This insertion disrupted codon 110 and generated a shift in the open reading frame and a stop codon at position 150. This alteration should induce the generation of a shorter p53 protein with a different amino acid sequence in its carboxy terminal portion. This means that the DNA binding domain, oligomerization domain, and nuclear localization signals should be lost.

Acquisition of TP53 mutations can have two consequences: 1) a dominant negative effect by hetero-oligomerization of the more stable mutant p53 with wild-type p53 molecules expressed from the normal remaining allele, and 2) a gain of function of the mutant p53 protein [22]. Thus, mutation of TP53 may provide a selective advantage for clonal expansion of pre-neoplastic or neoplastic cells. However, all mutations are not equivalent.

Mutant proteins differ in terms of the extent of their loss of suppressor function and by their capacity to inhibit wild-type p53 in a dominant-negative manner. In addition, some p53 mutants apparently exert an oncogenic activity of their own [9]. The TP53 region that most frequently contains deletions or insertions is that of codons 151-159: CGC CCG CGC CGC ACC CGC GTC CGC GCC. In fact, approximately 9% of all deletions and insertions and 1% of all TP53 mutations have been reported at this G:C-rich sequence with multiple runs and direct repeats [23]. The mutation reported in this work is located before this region.

To our knowledge, this mutation has not been previously reported; however, the mutation site has been reported as involved in several other alterations, including deletions and insertions of one or several nucleotides. In 1994, Birch et al [3] reported a complex mutation involving deletion of 11 base pairs and insertion of 5 base pairs in exon 4, which involves nearly the same site as the mutation reported herein; however, this mutation did not alter the reading frame.

The existence has been reported recently of at least nine isoforms of TP53, generated either by alternative splicing or by the presence of an internal promoter within intron 4 (none of which resembled the putative product that might be generated by the insertion found in our family with LFS) [24, 25]. The role of these isoforms in the cell is not yet clear; however, it has been demonstrated that their expression is tissue-dependent, indicating that their expression is selectively regulated and that they bind differentially to endogenous p53-inducible promoters. However, three of these nine isoforms, denominated Δ133p53, -p53β, and -p53γ, which are generated by an internal promoter, produce mRNAs and proteins that lack the first 132 codons, involving the region where the mutation that we report herein is located. Additionally, these isoforms have been associated with breast cancer [24, 25]. These isoforms begin at the ATG at position 133 (in exon 5), which at the DNA level is not affected in the case reported on here, making possible the existence of the Δ133p53 isoforms, which could participate in the carcinogenesis of the different tumors found in this family (one of them, breast cancer). In the absence of the full- length p53 protein, it is possible that expression of Δ133p53 isoforms might be favored, which might act as a dominant negative, inactivating the p53 protein generated by the wild-type allele and blocking activities such as induction of apoptosis. This could explain the pathogenicity of the insertion/duplication in this family with LFS.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating this mutation associated with LFS. The functional consequence of this insertion is not known, and further analysis should be conducted to elucidate this. However, we believe that this mutation might be the cause of the LFS, because it is present in at least two affected family members. One of these developed breast cancer and died at a very young age, and in fact one half-sister of the proband also died of lung cancer at a very young age; although we did not have the opportunity to test the latter for the mutation, it is very likely that she was also a LFS carrier. It is necessary to carry out analysis of p53 mRNA and protein in this family in order to further elucidate the consequences of the mutation in the expression of p53 and the possible mechanism of carcinogenesis in carriers of the mutation.

Consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Psicofarma, S.A. de C.V. for DHPLC equipment facilities.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)
(2)
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (IIB), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

References

  1. Li FP, Fraumeni JR: Soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer and other neoplasms, a familial syndrome?. Ann Intern Med. 1969, 71: 747-752.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Li FP, Fraumeni JF: Prospective study of a family cancer syndrome. JAMA. 1982, 247: 2692-2694. 10.1001/jama.247.19.2692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Birch JM, Hartley AL, Tricker KJ, Prosser J, Condie A, Kelsey AM, Harris M, Morris Jones PH, Binchy A, Crowther D, Craft AW, Eden OB, Evans GR, Thompson E, Mann JR, Martin J, Mitchell ELD, Santibáñez-Koref MF: Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 1298-1304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Frebourg T, Barbier N, Yan Y, Garber JE, Dreyfus M, Fraumeni JF, Li FP, Friend SH: Germ-line p53 mutations in 15 families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 56: 608-615.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Varley JM, McGown G, Thorncroft M, Santibáñez-Koref MF, Kelsey AM, Tricker KJ, Evans DG, Birch JM: Germ-line mutations of TP53 in Li-Fraumeni families: an extended study of 39 families. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 3245-3252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Varley JM: Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2003, 21: 313-320. 10.1002/humu.10185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho Y, Gorina S, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP: Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science. 1994, 265: 346-355. 10.1126/science.8023157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ishioka C, Englert C, Winge P, Yan YX, Engelstein M, Friend SH: Mutational analysis of the carboxy-terminal portion of p53 using both yeast and mammalian cell assays in vivo. Oncogene. 1995, 10: 1485-1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hainaut P, Soussi T, Shomer B, Hollstein M, Greenblatt M, Hovig E, Harris CC, Montesano R: Database of p53 gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines: updated compilation and future prospects. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 151-157. 10.1093/nar/25.1.151.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Béroud C, Soussi T: p53 Gene mutation: software and database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 200-204. 10.1093/nar/26.1.200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. The IARC database. [http://www-p53.iarc.fr]
  12. Chompret A, Brugieres L, Ronsin M, Gardes M, Dessarps-Freichey F, Abel A, Hua D, Ligot L, Dondon MG, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Frébourg T, Lemerle J, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Feunteun J: P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. Br J Cancer. 2000, 82: 1932-1937. 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1167.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brugiéres L, Pagés S, Feunteun J, Bonaïti-Pellié C: Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening. J Med Genet. 2001, 38: 43-47. 10.1136/jmg.38.1.43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tinat J, Bougeard J, Baert-Desurmont S, Vasseur S, Martin C, Bouvignies E, Caron O, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Berthet P, Dugast C, Bonaiti-Pellié C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Frébourg T: 2009 Version of the Chompret Criteria for Li Fraumeni Syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: e108-e109. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7967.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pluquet O, Hainaut P: Genotoxic and non-genotoxic pathways of p53 induction. Cancer Lett. 2001, 174: 1-15. 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00698-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Petitjean A, Achatz MI, Borresen-Dale AL, Hainaut P, Olivier M: TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 2157-2165. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ: Surfing the p53 network. Nature. 2000, 408: 307-310. 10.1038/35042675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Loyant V, Jaffré A, Breton J, Baldi I, Vital A, Chapon F, Dutoit S, Lecluse Y, Loiseau H, Lebailly P, Gauduchon P: Screening of TP53 mutations by DHPLC and sequencing in brain tumours from patients with an occupational exposure to pesticides or organic solvents. Mutagenesis. 2005, 20: 365-373. 10.1093/mutage/gei052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. P53 Knowledgebase. [http://p53.bii.a-star.edu.sg]
  20. Human Genome Mutation Database. [http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac]
  21. Bougeard G, Sesboüé R, Baert-Desurmont S, Vasseur S, Martin C, Tinat J, Brugières L, Chompret A, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Frébourg T, the French LFS Working Group: Molecular basis of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome: an update from the French LFS families. J Med Genet. 2008, 45: 535-538. 10.1136/jmg.2008.057570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfeifer GP, Besaratinia A: Mutational spectra of human cancer. Hum Genet. 2009, 125: 493-506. 10.1007/s00439-009-0657-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenblatt MS, Grollman AP, Harris CC: Deletions and insertions in the p53 tumor suppressor gene in human cancers: confirmation of the DNA polymerase slippage/misalignment model. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 2130-2136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bourdon JC, Fernandes K, Murray-Zmijewski F, Liu G, Diot A, Xirodimas DP, Saville MK, Lane DP: p53 Isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 2122-2137. 10.1101/gad.1339905.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mills AA: p53: link to the past, bridge to the future. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 2091-2099. 10.1101/gad.1362905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Taja-Chayeb et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.