Open Access

Malignant pleural mesothelioma metastatic to the submandibular salivary gland, simulating glandular hypertrophy, diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a case report and literature review

  • Massimo Ambroggi1,
  • Elena Orlandi1,
  • Raoul P Foroni2 and
  • Luigi Cavanna1Email author
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201412:129

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-129

Received: 16 August 2013

Accepted: 7 April 2014

Published: 28 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm that generally develops in the pleural or peritoneal cavity. Distant metastases are common; it rarely metastatizes to the head and neck region.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old white man, a non-smoker, was treated with chemotherapy, surgery and radiation for a malignant pleural mesothelioma. Seven months after the last treatment, he developed a right submandibular enlargement: clinical examination, ultrasound and computerized tomography scans revealed a salivary gland hypertrophy. Anti-inflammatory and antibiotic treatment was then started, without improvement. An ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) showed atypical mesothelial cells with nuclear enlargement and increased chromatin representation. Immunocytochemistry showed positivity for calretinin and WT-1.

A diagnosis of right submandibular salivary gland involvement from mesothelioma was established, allowing an adequate treatment.

Conclusion

We report a very rare site of metastasis from malignant pleural mesothelioma. We suggest that US-guided FNAB is a useful, quick, and cheap procedure for a definite diagnosis.

Keywords

Mesothelioma Salivary gland metastasis Fine needle aspiration

Background

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm with an incidence rate of 1 per 100,000 (both sexes, United States) [1].

Approximately 80% of cases of mesothelioma develop in the pleural cavity, whereas the other 20% arise in the peritoneum; the pericardium is affected very rarely [2].

Metastases from malignant mesothelioma are common, usually to the local lymph nodes, pleurae of the contralateral lung, bone, liver and brain [3]. However, metastases to the head and neck region are uncommon but the jaw bones, particularly the mandibular molar area, are more likely to be the site of metastases than the perioral region [419].

We present a 54-year-old man, a non-smoker, with no occupational exposure to asbestos with malignant pleural mesothelioma, previously treated with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. He presented with right submandibular salivary gland enlargement, diagnosed using US and computerized tomography (CT) scan imaging techniques, as salivary gland hypertrophy, while a fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) showed metastasis from malignant mesothelioma.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old Caucasian man underwent right pleural biopsy in December 2005 for recurrent pleural effusion and locally advanced malignant mesothelioma was diagnosed. Subsequently, he was treated with chemotherapy containing cisplatin and pemetrexed for seven cycles; CT scan showed a partial response. In December 2006, he underwent surgery involving total right pleuro-pneumonectomy plus partial resection of the pericardium and diaphragm. The histological features showed epithelioid malignant mesothelioma involving the parietal and the visceral pleurae, the lung, the pericardium and the diaphragm.

Subsequent radiotherapy to the right chest was administered using 50.4 Gy, 28 fractions.

The patient remained disease-free until June 2009 when an isoechogenic and hypodense nodule of 35 × 16 mm was discovered on US and CT scan in the right side of the anterior abdominal wall. An ultrasound-guided biopsy showed metastasis of mesothelioma. In August 2009, the nodule was surgically removed, and radiotherapy was then administered to this site using 45 Gy, 15 fractions.

In September 2011, a relapse in the mediastinum (lymph nodes) was found by CT scan and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), so six cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed were started which lasted until January 2012. Complete response at PET examination in February 2012 was demonstrated.

In November 2012, a right submandibular salivary gland tumefaction was recorded. US examination showed right submandibular gland hypertrophy (Figure 1), confirmed on CT scan and with neither US nor CT signs of metastasis; a diagnosis of inflammation of the gland was made. Anti-inflammatory therapy was administered; the patient also received antibiotic therapy but without improvement. An US-guided FNAB of the right submandibular salivary gland was then performed using a 22-gauge needle and showed atypical mesothelial cells, with nuclear enlargement and increased chromatin representation (Figure 2). Immunocytochemistry showed positivity for calretinin (Figure 3) and nuclear, weak and focal positivity for WT-1 (Figure 4). Based on the previous history of malignant mesothelioma and the morphologic features of the cells, immunocytochemistry allowed confirmation of the diagnosis of right submandibular involvement from epithelioid mesothelioma. The subsequent PET scan was positive for the right submandibular salivary gland. The patient was treated with radiotherapy to this site.
Figure 1

Ultrasound image showing a right submandibular salivary gland enlargement with a low-echogenic pattern.

Figure 2

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of right submandibular salivary gland shows atypical mesothelial cells with nuclear enlargement and increased chromatin representation (A) and normal salivary gland cells ((B) acinar cells; (C) ductal cells). May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) x40.

Figure 3

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of right submandibular salivary gland shows neoplastic mesothelial cells positive for calretinin (A) and normal acinar glandular cells (B). Immunocytochemistry, Fast red N.4.

Figure 4

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of right submandibular salivary gland, showing nuclear, weak and focal, immunocytochemically WT-1 positive mesothelioma cells (A) and normal acinar salivary gland cells (B). Immunocytochemistry, DAB.

Literature review

A computerized literature search through MEDLINE, Cancerlit and Embase was performed, in order to make a comparison with our case, applying the words: ‘mesothelioma', ‘metastasis', ‘oral cavity', ‘mouth', ‘buccal', ‘tongue', ‘head and neck area’. Articles and abstracts were also identified by back-referencing from original and relevant papers. Selected for the present review were papers published in English before April 2013.

Conclusion

With this case report, we would like to focus on two aspects: 1) metastases from mesothelioma to the head and neck area (except for lymph nodes), in particular to the salivary glands, are very rare; 2) diagnosis of metastasis from mesothelioma is made usually by biopsy, and not by FNAB as in our case (Table 1).
Table 1

Review of head and neck (except for lymph node) metastases from mesothelioma published in the literature

Site of metastasis

Number of patients

Clinical presentation

Diagnostic modality

References

Tongue

7

Tongue lesion, nodular consolidation of the tongue with chronic bleeding, submucosal mass, horizontal fissure, swelling of the dorsal surface of the tongue, polypoid lesion

Surgery, lingual incisional and excisional biopsy

[5, 7, 10, 1416, 18]

Mandible

4

Radicular cyst, mandibular gingival mass, periapical radiolucency

Excision of the tooth, biopsy, incisional biopsy, excision of the mass

[5, 6, 8, 12]

Oral mucosa

3

Submucosal mass

Biopsy

[11, 17, 19]

Lips

1

Lip lesion

Lip biopsy

[9]

Conjunctiva

1

n/a

n/a

[11]

Thyroid

1

n/a

n/a

[11]

Total

17

   

We collected the previously published cases of metastases from mesothelioma to the head and neck area, except for lymph node metastases. Tongue was the most frequent site of metastases, with different clinical presentations; no metastases to the salivary glands had previously been found, and no diagnoses of metastases with FNAB had been made.

Reviewing the literature, we found 17 other cases of metastases to the head and neck area (except for lymph nodes) from mesothelioma, but none to the salivary glands. The most involved site was the tongue, with different clinical presentations, followed by the mandible and in particular the mandibular alveolus, and then the oral mucosa. The clinical presentation can be of a benign polypoid-like lesion of the tongue or a radicular cyst in the mandibular alveolus, with only cyto-histological examination allowing a definite diagnosis.

The diagnosis of primary malignant mesothelioma is established by a combination of clinical, imaging, histopathological and immunohistochemical features. The diagnosis of a secondary mesothelioma is easier and can be made more rapidly since there is a previous diagnosis of the primary lesion [19]. However, even with the knowledge of a primary mesothelioma it is necessary to perform a definite diagnosis of a putative lesion to allow appropriate management of the patient.

Reviewing the literature, in almost all cases of head and neck metastases from mesothelioma, incisional or excisional biopsy was performed to obtain the diagnosis; in some cases surgical excision was needed. We found no cases diagnosed by FNAB.

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is a clinically accepted, minimally invasive technique that allows sampling of tumor for diagnosis by percutaneously directing a needle into the target lesion guided either by direct palpation or under image guidance [20]. In general, the accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of FNAB results depend on the size of the lesion, the method of biopsy, and the histology of the tumor [21]. When FNAB is applied as a diagnostic technique in patients with suspected malignant mesothelioma, the accuracy of diagnosis may be low.

Though the cytologic diagnostic features of malignant mesothelioma were described more than 50 years ago, there is still doubt as to the ability of the cytopathologic modality to obtain a definitive diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma [2224].

The published sensitivity of cytologic diagnosis of mesothelioma ranges between 32% and 76%, and this wide range of sensitivity is probably related to the sampling technique rather than the interpretation [24].

It must be emphasized that application of immunocytochemical and molecular techniques greatly enhance the diagnostic accuracy of cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma [2527]. FNAB biopsies are an ideal method for detecting tumor relapse during the life cycle of the cancer [28], as demonstrated in our case where the imaging techniques of US and CT scans suggested only salivary gland hypertrophy, while FNAB confirmed mesothelioma relapse.

This case is interesting in that it demonstrates a rare site of metastasis from malignant mesothelioma, and shows the efficacy of FNAB for a definite cytologic diagnosis, thus allowing optimum treatment.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Abbreviations

FNAB: 

fine needle aspiration biopsy

US: 

ultrasound

CT: 

computerized tomography

PET: 

Positron Emission Tomography.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oncology and Hematology, Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera, ‘Guglielmo da Saliceto’
(2)
Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera, ‘Guglielmo da Saliceto’

References

  1. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR). 1975-20011.http://seer.cancer.gov/,
  2. Brenner J, Sordillo PP, Magrill GB, Golbey RB: Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: review of 123 patients. Cancer. 1982, 49: 2431-2435. 10.1002/1097-0142(19820601)49:11<2431::AID-CNCR2820491134>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. King JA, Tucker JA, Wong SW: Mesothelioma: a study of 22 cases. South Med J. 1997, 90: 199-205. 10.1097/00007611-199702000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirshberg A, Shnaiderman-Shapiro A, Kaplan I, Berger R: Metastatic tumours to the oral cavity: pathogenesis and analysis of 673 cases. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44: 743-752. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.09.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kerpel SM, Freedman PD: Metastatic mesothelioma of the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993, 76: 746-751. 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90046-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sproat CP, Brown AE, Lindley RP: Oral metastasis in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993, 31: 316-317. 10.1016/0266-4356(93)90069-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Piattelli A, Fioroni M, Rubini C: Tongue metastasis from a malignant diffuse mesothelioma of the pleura: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999, 57: 861-863. 10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90831-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garcia-Reija MF, Matilla JM, De Paz A, Sanchez-Cuellar A, Verrier A: Unusual metastasis to the mandibular alveolus of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002, 126: 435-437. 10.1067/mhn.2002.123921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassarino DS, Xue W, Shannon KJ: Widespread cutaneous and perioral metastases of mesothelioma. J Cutan Pathol. 2003, 30: 582-585. 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2003.00110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zanconati F, Delconte A, Bonifacio-Gori D, Falconieri G: Metastatic pleural mesothelioma presenting with solitary involvement of the tongue: report of a new case and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2003, 11: 51-55. 10.1177/106689690301100114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Soyuer I, Soyuer S, Canöz Ö, Coşkun S, Balkanli S: Three patients with unusual metastases. Cytopathology. 2004, 15: 58-62. 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00113.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Terakado N, Shintani S, Nakashiro K, Hamakawa H: Malignant pleural mesothelioma metastasis to the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 33: 789-800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tho LM, O’Rouke NP: Unusual metastases from malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005, 17: 293-10.1016/j.clon.2004.07.017. abstractView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Glazer CA, Waldman EH, Ansari-Lari AM, Broussard JN, Brahmer J, Tufano RP: Pathology quiz. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006, 132 (1012): 1014-1015.Google Scholar
  15. Higginson DS, Brahmer J, Tufano RP, Bajaj GK: Pleural mesothelioma metastatic to the tongue. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 2133-2135. 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashitani S, Sakurai K, Takaoka K, Urade M: Metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma of the tongue: report of a case. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009, 47: 247-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirke D, Horwood K, Wallwork B: Floor of mouth and tongue metastasis from malignant pleural mesothelioma. ANZ J Surg. 2010, 80: 556-558. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05383.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Murray LJ, Higham J, Suvarna SK, Craig GT, Bridgewater CH, Fisher PM, Thornhill MH: Oral presentation of malignant mesothelioma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011, 111: e21-e26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sinon SH, Rich AM, Hussaini HM, Yoon HS, Firth NA, Seymour GJ: Metastases to the oral region from pleural mesothelioma: clinicopathologic review. Head Neck. 2013, 35 (4): 599-604. 10.1002/hed.21942.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cavanna L, Lazzaro A, Vallisa D, Civardi G, Artioli F: Role of image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of patients with splenic metastasis. World J Surg Oncol. 2007, 5: 13-10.1186/1477-7819-5-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vilmann P, Saftoiu A: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: equipment and technique. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 21: 1646-1655. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04475.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Whitaker D: The cytology of malignant mesothelioma. Cytopathology. 2000, 11 (3): 139-151. 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00247.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheaff M: Should cytology be an acceptable means of diagnosing malignant mesothelioma?. Cytopathology. 2011, 22 (1): 3-4. 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00840.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Husain AN, Colby T, Ordomnez N, Krausz T, Attanoos R, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Butnor K, Cagle PT, Chirieac LR, Churg A, Dacic S, Fraire A, Galateau-Salle F, Gibbs A, Gown A, Hammar S, Litzky L, Marchevsky AM, Nicholson AG, Roggli V, Travis WD, Wick M, International Mesothelioma Interest Group: Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. 2012 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013, 137 (5): 647-67. 10.5858/arpa.2012-0214-OA.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Au AY, Hackl T, Yeager TR, Cohen SB, Pass HI, Harris CC, Reddel RR: Telomerase activity in pleural malignant mesotheliomas. Lung Cancer. 2011, 73 (3): 283-288. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.12.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T: Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011, 39 (6): 395-401. 10.1002/dc.21398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T: IMP3/L523S, a novel immunocytochemical marker that distinguishes benign and malignant cells: the expression profiles of IMP3/L523S in effusion cytology. Hum Pathol. 2010, 41 (5): 745-750. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. De Rienzo A, Dong L, Yeap BY, Jensen RV, Richards WG, Gordon GJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Bueno R: Fine-needle aspiration biopsies for gene expression ratio-based diagnostic and prognostic tests in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 310-316. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0806.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ambroggi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement