Open Access

Sialyl Lewis X as a predictor of skip N2 metastasis in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

  • Hiroaki Komatsu1,
  • Shinjiro Mizuguchi1,
  • Nobuhiro Izumi1,
  • Kyukwang Chung1,
  • Shoji Hanada1,
  • Hidetoshi Inoue1,
  • Shigefumi Suehiro1 and
  • Noritoshi Nishiyama1Email author
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:309

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-309

Received: 17 April 2013

Accepted: 22 November 2013

Published: 6 December 2013

Abstract

Background

Radical segmentectomy has been performed for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, underestimation of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in the absence of hilar or interlobar metastasis (skip N2) affects surgical strategy. Our aim was to investigate preoperative and intraoperative predictors of skip N2 in clinical stage (c-stage) IA NSCLC.

Methods

From 1998 to 2011, 279 patients (155 men and 124 women) with c-stage IA NSCLC (230 pN0, 17 pN1, 12 skip N2, 20 non-skip N2) underwent systematic lobectomy (R0 resection) at our institute. We compared preoperative serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19 fragment, sialyl Lewis X (SLX), and pre- and intraoperative clinicopathological features of pN0 and skip N2 patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to distinguish between the two patient groups.

Results

The 5-year survival rate of skip N2 patients was 78.6%, higher than that of non-skip N2 patients (44.9%), and not significantly different than that of pN0 (86.7%) or pN1 patients (82.4%). The mean serum SLX concentration in skip N2 patients (28.0 U/ml) was elevated compared to that in pN0 patients (22.9 U/ml). In ROC analysis of SLX, the area under the curve was 0.710, and the optimal cut-off value was 21.4 U/ml (sensitivity, 91.7%; specificity, 51.7%). In multivariate analysis, SLX was an independent predictor of skip N2 in patients with c-stage IA NSCLC (odds ratio, 9.43; p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Skip N2 metastasis is common in patients with c-stage IA NSCLC with high serum SLX, and lobectomy with complete dissection of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes should remain the standard surgical procedure for these cases.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancerSialyl Lewis XSkip N2SurgeryPrognosis

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on the stage of the disease [2]. Lobectomy with radical lymph node dissection remains the standard initial therapy for patients with stage I, II, and IIIA NSCLC [3, 4], but limited resection has also been performed for early stage NSCLC. The Lung Cancer Study Group performed a pivotal study comparing limited resection (segment or wedge) with lobectomy for clinical stage (c-stage) IA NSCLC and found inferior overall survival and three times the local recurrence rate in the limited resection group [5]. Radical segmentectomy has been performed for small-sized (tumor diameter ≤3 cm) c-stage IA NSCLC [68]. In reported studies there was no significant difference in overall 5-year survival rates between patients undergoing segmentectomy compared to lobectomy (75.0 to 89.8% and 81.0 to 84.0%, respectively) [69]. In a separate study, Whitson et al. reported that lobectomy conferred superior unadjusted overall and cancer-specific 5-year survival compared with segmentectomy [10]. Thus, the issue of surgical strategy remains controversial. A phase III study is underway in Japan to evaluate overall survival of patients with small-sized (tumor diameter ≤2 cm) peripheral NSCLC treated with segmentectomy versus lobectomy (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L) [11].

The surgical indication for radical segmentectomy must include negative hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastases. If any diseased lymph node is found, segmentectomy should be converted to standard lobectomy. In some reports, segmentectomy was performed in patients with NSCLC (tumor diameter ≤2 cm) negative for lymph node metastasis, as confirmed by frozen-section intraoperative examination [12, 13]. However, N2 lymph node metastasis without N1 hilar or interlobar lymph node involvement (skip N2 metastasis) might be overlooked if segmentectomy is performed with frozen-section examination of hilar and interlobar lymph nodes only. It has been reported that among 275 patients with c-stage IA NSCLC who were scheduled to undergo radical segmentectomy, 15 patients (6%) had pathologically confirmed N1 or N2 disease, and 4 of these (27%) had skip N2 metastasis [14]. Recently, intraoperative sentinel-node biopsy has been performed using new methods, such as isotope [14, 15] or indocyanine green fluorescence [16] to avoid overlooking skip N2 metastasis. Patients with skip N2 have a better prognosis than non-skip N2 patients (overall 5-year survival rate, 34.4 to 41.0% and 14.0 to 24.0%, respectively) when treated with lobectomy and hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection [1722]. Therefore, accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node involvement is very important in planning adequate surgical resection. Our aim was to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative predictors of skip N2 and to recommend appropriate surgical resection in small-sized (tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm) c-stage IA NSCLC.

Methods

Two hundred seventy-nine patients (155 men and 124 women, mean age 66.2 years) with c-stage IA (tumor diameter ≤3 cm) NSCLC underwent pulmonary resection (R0) at Osaka City University Hospital from January 1998 to December 2011. The surgical procedure performed was potentially curative complete resection by systematic lobectomy in combination with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection (over ND2a-1). When lymph node metastases in lymph nodes number 10, 11, and 12 were suspected intraoperatively, these lymph nodes were examined by frozen section. Patients with preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded from the study. Pathological diagnoses were performed by at least two pathologists in our hospital according to the criteria of the World Health Organization [23], and stages were classified according to the tumor, metastasis, node (TMN) classification of the International Union Against Cancer [24]. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, bone scintigraphy, and positron-emission tomography (PET) were performed to examine the distant metastasis. If CT revealed a mediastinal lymph node with a short axis-length over 10 mm, mediastinal staging was performed using video-assisted thoracotomy, fine-needle aspiration with bronchoscopy, or PET. The sites of the N1 and N2 lymph nodes were determined based on primary tumor location according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer using the new lymph node map for NSCLC [25]. Skip N2 metastases were defined as N2 lymph node metastases without N1 node involvement. Histopathologic evaluations were done by microscopic examinations of hematoxylin and eosin staining. Proportion of ground-glass opacity (GGO) area was calculated as follows:
Area on lung window Area on solid window / Area on lung window × 100 .

Preoperative serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), and sialyl-Lewis X (SLX) were measured in each patient.

Institutional review board approval and informed consent

This study was approved by the ethics committee at Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine. Written informed consent was received from all patients.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and JMP, version 9 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences in serum levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1, and SLX were analyzed for statistical significance using a nonparametric test (Mann–Whitney U-test). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff point and the sensitivity and specificity of each tumor marker to distinguish skip N2 patients from patients without pathological lymph node metastasis (pN0). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Statistical significance of the associations between skip N2 and various clinicopathological variables was evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Survival curves were calculated from the day of surgery to death or to final follow up using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Postoperative survival of patients with different pathological N factors

The 279 patients with NSCLC included 230 patients without pathological lymph node metastasis (pN0), 17 patients with hilar or interlobar lymph node metastasis (pN1), 12 patients with skip N2 metastasis, and 20 patients with non-skip N2 metastasis. Table 1 shows pathological stages of patients based on each pathological N factor. The median postoperative observation time was 47 months (range 2 to 148 months). The overall 5-year survival rates for patients with pN0, pN1, skip N2, and non-skip N2 were 86.7%, 82.4%, 78.6%, and 44.9%, respectively (Figure 1). The prognosis of skip N2 patients was significantly better than that of non-skip N2 patients (P = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the prognoses of skip N2 and pN0 or pN1 patients (P = 0.336, P = 0.700, respectively).
Table 1

Pathological stages of patients based on each pathological N factor

 

Number of patients

 

Pathological N0

Pathological N1

Skip N2

Non-skip N2

Pathological stage

    

  IA/IB

189/31

0/0

0/0

0/0

  IIA/IIB

0/4

17/0

0/0

0/0

  IIIA

6

0

12

20

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves for postoperative overall survival of 230 pathologic (p)N0 patients, 17 pN1 patients, 12 skip N2 patients, and 20 non-skip N2 patients. The prognosis of skip N2 patients was significantly better than that of non-skip N2 patients (P = 0.008). There was no significant difference between the prognosis of skip N2 and pN0 or pN1 patients (P = 0.801, P = 0.985, respectively). pN0: pathological N0; pN1: pathological N1.

Distributions of serum CEA, CYFRA21-1, and SLX in pN0 and skip N2 patients

To avoid underestimating skip N2 metastasis with frozen-section examination of only hilar and interlobar lymph nodes, clinical and surgical features of pN0 and skip N2 patients were compared. Table 2 shows the mean serum concentration of CEA, CYFRA21-1, and SLX in pN0 and skip N2 patients. Serum concentrations of CEA and CYFRA21-1 were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.196, P = 0.936, respectively). As shown in Figure 2, serum concentration of SLX rose with increasing pathological N factor. The serum SLX levels in skip N2 patients (mean 28.0 U/mL) and non-skip N2 patients (mean, 33.6 U/mL) were significantly higher than in pN0 patients (mean, 22.9 U/mL; P = 0.015, P = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the serum SLX levels of pN1 (mean 25.1 U/mL) and pN0 patients (P = 0.226). The ROC curve of SLX concentration to distinguish skip N2 patients from pN0 patients is shown in Figure 3. The AUC was 0.710. The calculated optimal cutoff point for serum SLX level was 21.4 U/mL (Youden index = 0.433). The sensitivity of this cutoff was 91.7% (11 of 12 skip N2 patients), and the specificity was 51.7% (109 of 211 pN0 patients). ROC curve analysis of CEA levels was also performed. The AUC was 0.611, the optimal cutoff point was 2.8 ng/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 37.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the AUC of SLX and CEA (P = 0.227).
Table 2

Serum concentrations of CEA, CYFRA21-1, and SLX in pN0 and skip N2 patients

 

Number of patients

Mean serum level (95% CI)

P-value

Pathological N0

Skip N2

Pathological N0

Skip N2

 

CEA (ng/mL)

230

12

5.3 (4.5, 6.0)

5.4 (3.5, 7.4)

0.196

CYFRA21-1 (ng/mL)

219

12

1.4 (1.3, 1.6)

1.8 (0.6, 2.9)

0.936

SLX (U/mL)

211

12

22.9 (21.7, 24.1)

28.0 (23.5, 32.6)

0.015

CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CYFRA: cytokeratin 19 fragment; SLX: sialyl Lewis X

 

Mann-Whitney U-test

Figure 2

Percentile distribution of serum sialyl Lewis X (SLX) concentrations in pathological (p)N0, pN1, skip N2, and non-skip N2 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Each box contains the variable distribution between the 25th and 75th percentiles, with median value indicated with a line in the box. The bars extending above and below the box indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles, respectively. The mean SLX concentration was significantly higher in the skip N2 patients compared to that in the pN0 patients (P = 0.015).

Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic curve for serum sialyl Lewis X (SLX) in pathological (p)N0 and skip N2 patients. The area under the curve (AUC) = 0.710. The calculated optimal cutoff point for serum SLX concentration was 21.4 U/mL (Youden index = 0.433), and the sensitivity was 91.7% (11 of 12 skip N2 patients), whereas the specificity was 51.7% (109 of 211 pN0 patients).

Clinicopathological features of 12 skip N2 patients

Table 3 shows clinicopathological features of 12 skip N2 patients according to age, sex, tumor side, tumor location, histology, tumor size, proportion of GGO, distance from tumor to pleura on CT, serum concentration of SLX, lymph vessel invasion (ly) factor, venous invasion (v) factor, pathological pleural invasion (pPL) factor, and site of skip N2 metastasis. Of 12 patients with skip N2, 10 (83.3%) were positive for ly factor, and 5 (41.7%) were positive for v factor, whereas among pN0 patients, only 20.2% were positive for ly factor and 3.8% for v factor (P <0.001). On preoperative CT, eight of twelve skip N2 patients had peripheral lung cancers located close to the pleura (distance ≤5 mm). Six patients (50%) had lung cancer in the lower lobes; of these, three had skip metastasis to subcarinal lymph nodes and three had skip metastasis to upper mediastinal lymph nodes. By contrast, all six patients with lung cancer in the upper lobes had skip metastasis to upper mediastinal lymph nodes. In relation to the site of skip N2 metastasis, nine patients (75%) had single-station disease, and three patients (25%) had multi-station disease.
Table 3

Clinicopathological features of 12 skip N2 patients

Pt. no.

Age/sex

Side

Location (lobe)

Histology

Tumor size (mm)

Proportion of GGO (%)

Distance to pleura (mm)

SLX (U/mL)

ly

v

pPL

Site of skip N2

1

73/M

Rt

Upper

Sq

15

19

4

36.2

+

-

0

No. 2R, 4R LN

2

34/F

Rt

Upper

Ad

16

68

13

27.4

+

-

0

No.4R LN

3

70/F

Rt

Upper

Ad

21

47

30

21.4

+

+

0

No.2R, 4R LN

4

62/F

Rt

Upper

Ad

14

24

28

13.1

+

-

0

No. 4R LN

5

71/M

Rt

Lower

Ad

30

9

0

40.2

-

-

0

No. 7 LN

6

61/F

Rt

Lower

Ad

24

27

0

32.8

+

+

1

No. 7 LN

7

60 M

Rt

Lower

Ad

24

23

0

29.0

+

+

0

No.2R, 4R LN

8

62/F

Lt

Upper

Ad

20

72

5

23.6

+

+

1

No. 5 LN

9

81/M

Lt

Upper

Sq

27

13

0

24.5

+

-

2

No. 5 LN

10

63/M

Lt

Lower

Ad

15

38

0

28.0

+

-

0

No. 5 LN

11

60/M

Lt

Lower

Ad

23

7

14

27.0

-

+

0

No. 7 LN

12

57/F

Lt

Lower

Ad

20

3

0

33.0

+

-

0

No. 5 LN

Pt. no., patient number; M,male; F, female; Rt, right; Lt, left; Ad, adenocarcinoma; Sq, squamous cell carcinoma; GGO, ground-glass opacity; distance to pleura, measured on computed-tomography; SLX, sialyl Lewis X; ly, lymph vessel invasion factor; v, venous invasion factor; pPL, pathological pleural invasion factor; No. 2R, upper paratracheal lymph node; No. 4R LN, lower paratracheal lymph node; No. 5 LN, subaortic lymph node; No. 7 LN, subcarinal lymph node.

Clinical and surgical features of pN0 and skip N2 patients

To reveal preoperative and intraoperative predictive factors for skip N2, we compared pN0 and skip N2 patients, looking for underestimation of nodal factors based on intraoperative hilar or interlobar lymph node examination. Table 4 lists the clinical and surgical features of 230 pN0 patients and 12 skip N2 patients according to age, sex, tumor side, tumor location, histology, tumor differentiation, tumor diameter, sPL factor, serum SLX concentration, and serum CEA concentration. Univariate analysis revealed that skip N2 was significantly associated with elevated serum SLX concentrations (odds ratio = 9.91; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other clinical or surgical features. Results of multivariate analysis show that SLX was the only independent predictor of skip N2 metastasis in patients with c-stage IA NSCLC (odds ratio = 9.43; P = 0.006).
Table 4

Clinical and surgical features of 230 pathological (p)N0 patients and 12 skip N2 patients

 

Number of patients

Univariate

Multivariate

pN0

Skip N2

P-value

P-value

Odds ratio

95% CI

Age

      

  Mean ± SD

66.5 ± 10.2

62.8 ± 11.4

0.268a

   

Sex

      

  Male

121

6

1.000

NA

NA

NA

  Female

109

6

    

Side

      

  Right

131

7

1.000

NA

NA

NA

  Left

99

5

    

Location

      

  Upper/Middle lobe

151

6

0.353

NA

NA

NA

  Lower lobe

79

6

    

Histology

      

  Ad

192

10

1.000

NA

NA

NA

  Sq/AdSq

38

2

    

Tumor differentiation

      

  Well/moderate

181

7

0.146

0.361

1.80

0.49, 6.13

  Poor

49

5

    

Tumor diameter (cm)

      

  ≤2

113

6

1.000

NA

NA

NA

  >2

117

6

    

sPL factor

      

  sPL0

141

6

0.547

NA

NA

NA

  sPL1-3

89

6

    

SLX (U/mL)

      

  ≥21.4

121

11

0.007

0.006

9.43

1.75, 175

  <21.4

109

1

    

CEA (ng/mL)

      

  ≥2.8

143

11

0.060

0.077

4.78

0.87, 89.2

  <2.8

87

1

    

Ad: adenocarcinoma

 

Fisher’s exact test

Multivariate logistic regression analysis

Sq: squamous cell carcinoma

 

aMann-Whitney U-test

   

AdSq: adenosquamous carcinoma

     

sPL factor: surgical pleural invasion factor

     

CI: confidence interval

     

Discussion

Radical segmentectomy with systematic lymph node dissection has been performed for small-sized NSCLC [7, 8, 14, 15]. When intraoperative frozen-section examination of hilar or interlobar lymph node reveals metastasis, we believe segmentectomy should be converted to standard lobectomy. The question of whether radical segmentectomy allows adequate lymph node dissection remains controversial, because the mean number of dissected lymph nodes with segmentectomy is significantly lower than with lobectomy [7]. Intraoperative frozen-section examination of hilar or interlobar lymph can detect pN1 or non-skip N2 disease, which leads to appropriate surgical resection. However, underestimation of skip N2 due to the difficulty of examining all mediastinal lymph nodes intraoperatively leads to challenges in choosing the appropriate surgical procedure. In a study on intraoperative sentinel lymph node identification, Kim et al. reported that five of forty c-stage I NSCLC patients (12.5%) had mediastinal sentinel lymph nodes without hilar lymph node involvement [26]. One mechanism of skip N2 is lymphatic flow from the lung directly to the mediastinum through the pleura [27]. Radical segmentectomy for patients with skip N2 metastasis has the possibility that micro cancer cells remain in pleural lymphatic ducts. Therefore, a preoperative or intraoperative predictive factor for skip N2 metastasis is necessary to choose adequate surgical resection.

Skip metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes has been reported to occur in 20 to 40% of patients with N2 NSCLC [4, 27, 28]. In our study, the 5-year survival rate for skip N2 patients was even higher than that in other previous reports [1722], which was because these previous reports included many patients with large-sized tumor (tumor diameter >3 cm) [18, 2022]. In addition, 75% of skip N2 patients had single-station disease, which was more frequent than the other reports [21, 22] and affected this discrepancy. In several reports, clinicopathological factors were analyzed in patients with skip N2 metastasis. Skip N2 metastasis was more frequent with tumors in the upper lobes than the lower lobes [17, 18], in right-sided lesions than left-sided lesions [21], and in cases of squamous cell carcinoma than in cases of adenocarcinoma [21, 22]. In our study, there were no significant differences between pN0 and skip N2 patients in tumor side, location, or histology. Small-sized NSCLCs are heterogenous, including pure GGO, GGO with small consolidation and real consolidation. The proportion of GGO area on CT has been reported as a predictor of lymph node metastasis. There has been shown to be no lymph node metastasis in patients with c-stage IA adenocarcinoma with more than 50% proportion of GGO [29]. In addition, 98.7% of patients with c-stage IA NSCLC with less than 25% consolidation of the maximum tumor diameter showed pathological non-invasiveness [30]. In our study, the patients with c-stage IA NSCLC with more than a 75% proportion of GGO never exhibited skip N2 metastasis, and those with a 50 to 75% proportion of GGO occasionally exhibited skip N2 metastasis, as shown in Table 3.

Pathological factors such as pleural invasion [31] and tumor size [18] have also been reported to be associated with skip N2. There were no significant associations between skip N2 metastasis and surgical or pathological PL factor or tumor diameter in this study. One mechanism of skip N2 is pleural lymphatic flow [27], and ly and v factors have been reported to predict lymph node metastasis in NSCLC [32]. Therefore, we investigated whether distance to pleura or intersegmental plane, ly factor, or v factor were important predictors of skip N2 metastasis. Our data support distance to pleura, ly factor, and v factor as risk factors for skip N2 metastasis as shown in Table 3. Eight of twelve patients with skip N2 metastasis had peripheral lung cancers located close to the pleura (distance ≤5 mm), and eleven of twelve were positive for either ly or v factor. The only case of skip N2 that was close to the pleura and was negative for both ly and v factors was the largest tumor in the group (30 mm). Although ly and v factors were significantly associated with skip N2, it is important to note that these factors cannot be assessed preoperatively or intraoperatively. In our study, serum SLX concentration was the only useful preoperative or intraoperative test to help predict skip N2.

SLX is a carbohydrate antigen adhesion molecule that has been used as a tumor marker for carcinoma of many organs, including the lungs [33]. SLX plays an important role in cell-cell recognition and is therefore thought to be associated with the metastatic ability of cancer cells. In the case of lung cancer, we have reported that high serum concentrations of SLX are predictive of lymph node metastasis, postoperative recurrence, and poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC [3436]. Several authors have reported that SLX is predictive of distant metastasis in patients with primary lung cancer [3739]. As for other tumor markers, high serum CEA has also been reported to be a predictive factor for lymph node metastasis in patients with small-sized adenocarcinoma of the lung [40]. Although the AUC for SLX was 0.710, which was higher than that for CEA (0.611, P = 0.227) or for CYFRA21-1 (0.507, P = 0.106), results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed serum SLX concentration was an independent predictive factor for skip N2 in patients with c-stage IA NSCLC. The calculated optimal cutoff point for serum SLX concentration in this study (21.4 U/mL) was lower than the accepted cutoff for cancer screening (38.0 U/mL). We propose that the prognosis cutoff value should be used to predict skip N2 metastasis rather than the diagnosis cutoff value.

Conclusions

We found that serum SLX concentration was an independent predictive factor for skip N2 in c-stage IA NSCLC. Skip metastasis is common in NSCLC patients with high serum SLX, and lobectomy with complete dissection of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes should remain the standard surgical procedure for these patients. Preoperative serum SLX levels have the possibility to change the present surgical procedure of segmentectomy for patients with c-stage IA NSCLC.

Abbreviations

AUC: 

Area under the curve

CEA: 

Carcinoembryonic antigen

c-stage: 

Clinical stage

CT: 

Computed tomography

CYFRA21-1: 

Cytokeratin 19 fragment

GGO: 

Ground-glass opacity

ly factor: 

Lymph vessel invasion factor

NSCLC: 

Non-small cell lung cancer

PET: 

Positron-emission tomography

pN0: 

No pathological lymph node metastasis

pN1: 

Patients with hilar or interlobar lymph node metastasis

pPL factor: 

Pathological pleural invasion factor

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

SLX: 

Sialyl Lewis X

sPL factor: 

Surgical pleural invasion factor

v factor: 

Venous invasion factor.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007, 57: 43-66. 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstraw P, Crowley JJ, IASLC International Staging Project: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Project on Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2006, 1: 281-286. 10.1097/01243894-200605000-00002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fukui T, Mori S, Yokoi K, Mitsudomi T: Significance of number of positive lymph nodes in resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2006, 1: 120-125. 10.1097/01243894-200602000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Naruke T, Tsuchiya R, Kondo H, Nakayama H, Asamura H: Lymph node sampling in lung cancer: how should it be done?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999, 16: S17-S24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV: Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995, 60: 615-622. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00537-U. discussion 622–3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Okada M, Tsutani Y, Ikeda T, Misumi K, Matsumoto K, Yoshimura M, Miyata Y: Radical hybrid video-assisted thoracic segmentectomy: long-term results of minimally invasive anatomical sublobar resection for treating lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012, 14: 5-11. 10.1093/icvts/ivr065.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Anami K, Moroga T, Miyawaki M, Chujo M, Yamamoto S, Kawahara K: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy for T1 classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a single center experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012, 42: 83-88. 10.1093/ejcts/ezr254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yamashita S, Chujo M, Kawano Y, Miyawaki M, Tokuishi K, Anami K, Yamamoto S, Kawahara K: Clinical impact of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy under complete video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2011, 166: 46-51. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang CF, D'Amico TA: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 94: 668-681. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Andrade RS, Maddaus MA, Habermann EB, D'Cunha J: Survival after lobectomy versus segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011, 92: 1943-1950. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, Okada M, Asamura H, Shibata T, Nakamura S, Tada H, Tsuboi M: A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010, 40: 271-274. 10.1093/jjco/hyp156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Koike T, Koike T, Yamato Y, Yoshiya K, Toyabe S: Prognostic predictors in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing intentional segmentectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 93: 1788-1794. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhong C, Fang W, Mao T, Yao F, Chen W, Hu D: Comparison of Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Small-Sized Stage IA Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 94: 362-367. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nomori H, Mori T, Izumi Y, Kohno M, Yoshimoto K, Suzuki M: Is completion lobectomy merited for unanticipated nodal metastases after radical segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0/pN1-2 non-small cell lung cancer?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 143: 820-824. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nomori H, Mori T, Ikeda K, Yoshimoto K, Iyama K, Suzuki M: Segmentectomy for selected cT1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective study at a single institute. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 144: 87-93. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moroga T, Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Miyawaki M, Anami K, Yamamoto S, Kawahara K: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy with intraoperative evaluation of sentinel nodes for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 18: 89-94. 10.5761/atcs.oa.11.01726.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Prenzel KL, Mönig SP, Sinning JM, Baldus SE, Gutschow CA, Grass G, Schneider PM, Hölscher AH: Role of skip metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2003, 82: 256-260. 10.1002/jso.10219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Riquet M, Assouad J, Bagan P, Foucault C, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Dujon A, Danel C: Skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis and lung cancer: a particular N2 subgroup with a better prognosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 225-233. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunluoglu Z, Solak O, Metin M, Gurses A: The prognostic significance of skip mediastinal lymphatic metastasis in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002, 21: 595-10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01135-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gawrychowski J, Gabriel A, Lackowska B: Heterogeneity of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and evaluation of late results of surgical treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003, 29: 178-184. 10.1053/ejso.2002.1321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Misthos P, Sepsas E, Athanassiadi K, Kakaris S, Skottis I: Skip metastases: analysis of their clinical significance and prognosis in the IIIA stage of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004, 25: 502-508. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ilic N, Petricevic A, Arar D, Kotarac S, Banovic J, Ilic NF, Tripkovic A, Grandic L: Skip mediastinal nodal metastases in the in the IIIa/N2 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007, 2: 1018-1021. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318158d471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Beasley MB, Brambilla E, Travis WD: The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors. Semin Roentgenol. 2005, 40: 90-97. 10.1053/j.ro.2005.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C: TMN Classification of Malignant Tumours. 2009, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 7Google Scholar
  25. Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P, Members of IASLC Staging Committee: The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009, 4: 568-577. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a0d82e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim S, Kim HK, Kang DY, Jeong JM, Choi YH: Intra-operative sentinel lymph node identification using a novel receptor-binding agent (technetium-99 m neomannosyl human serum albumin, 99mTc-MSA) in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010, 37: 1450-1456. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Riquet M, Hidden G, Debesse B: Direct lymphatic drainage of lung segments to the mediastinal nodes. An anatomic study on 260 adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989, 97: 623-632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Asamura H, Nakayama H, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R, Naruke T: Lobe-specific extent of systematic lymph node dissection for non-small cell lung carcinomas according to a retrospective study of metastasis and prognosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999, 117: 1102-1111. 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70246-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuguma H, Yokoi K, Anraku M, Kondo T, Kamiyama Y, Mori K, Tominaga K, Tsuura Y, Honjo S: Proportion of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography in clinical T1 N0 M0 adenocarcinoma of the lung: A predictor of lymph node metastasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002, 124: 278-284. 10.1067/mtc.2002.122298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, Kusumoto M, Asamura H, Nagai K, Tada H, Mitsudomi T, Tsuboi M, Shibata T, Fukuda H, Kato H, Japan Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group (JCOG LCSSG): A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol. 2011, 6: 751-756. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821038ab.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Manac'h D, Riquet M, Medioni J, Le Pimpec-Barthes F, Dujon A, Danel C: Visceral pleura invasion by non-small cell lung cancer: an underrated bad prognostic factor. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001, 71: 1088-1093. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02649-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yilmaz A, Duyar SS, Cakir E, Aydin E, Demirag F, Karakaya J, Yazici U, Erdogan Y: Clinical impact of visceral pleural, lymphovascular and perineural invasion in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 40: 664-670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishida K, Yamamoto H, Ohtsuki T, Matsuba M, Mukai S, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T, Kondo M: Elevated tissue concentrations of sialyl Lex-i in cancerous tissues compared with those in noncancerous tissues of various organs. Cancer. 1991, 68: 111-117. 10.1002/1097-0142(19910701)68:1<111::AID-CNCR2820680122>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mizuguchi S, Nishiyama N, Iwata T, Nishida T, Izumi N, Tsukioka T, Inoue K, Uenishi T, Wakasa K, Suehiro S: Serum Sialyl Lewis x and cytokeratin 19 fragment as predictive factors for recurrence in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007, 58: 369-375. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mizuguchi S, Inoue K, Iwata T, Nishida T, Izumi N, Tsukioka T, Nishiyama N, Uenishi T, Suehiro S: High serum concentrations of Sialyl Lewisx predict multilevel N2 disease in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006, 13: 1010-1018. 10.1245/ASO.2006.05.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mizuguchi S, Nishiyama N, Iwata T, Nishida T, Izumi N, Tsukioka T, Inoue K, Kameyama M, Suehiro S: Clinical value of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment and sialyl-Lewis x in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007, 83: 216-221. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fukuoka K, Narita N, Saijo N: Increased expression of sialyl Lewis(x) antigen is associated with distant metastasis in lung cancer patients: immunohistochemical study on bronchofiberscopic biopsy specimens. Lung Cancer. 1998, 20: 109-116. 10.1016/S0169-5002(98)00016-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Kamma H, Yamashita YT, Takahashi H, Ohtsuka M, Hasegawa S: Serum sialyl lewis X-i antigen levels in non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with distant metastasis and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 1997, 3: 495-499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Kamma H, Yamashita YT, Takahashi H, Ohtsuka M, Hasegawa S: Elevated serum sialyl Lewis X-i antigen levels in non-small cell lung cancer with lung metastasis. Respiration. 1998, 65: 295-298. 10.1159/000029279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Inoue M, Takakuwa T, Minami M, Shiono H, Utsumi T, Kadota Y, Nasu T, Aozasa K, Okumura M: Clinicopathologic factors influencing postoperative prognosis in patients with small-sized adenocarcinoma of lung. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008, 135: 830-836. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Komatsu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement