Skip to main content
Download PDF

Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 22, Article number: 109 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Methods

Data were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

In SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157–5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830).

Conclusions

Limited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Background

In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancers, considered invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) as a variant subtype of invasive adenocarcinoma (ADC) [1]. The distinctive histological morphology is characterized by goblet or columnar cells with abundant intracytoplasmic mucin. Compared to nonmucinous ADC, IMA accounts for nearly 5% of all kinds of lung ADCs and had striking differences in its clinical, radiological, pathological, and genetic aspects [2, 3]. More importantly, patients with IMA have a more favorable prognosis than those with nonmucinous ADC. Furthermore, previous studies have reported that patients with IMA have a comparable prognosis to patients with acinar and papillary subtypes nonmucinous ADC [4, 5].

With the increasing detection rate of early-stage lung cancer using thin-section computed tomography, limited resection aroused great interest as a therapy for early-stage lung cancers [6, 7]. Despite ongoing controversies about the oncologic efficiency between limited resection and lobectomy, its use in early-stage lung cancers is increasing [8]. In clinical practice, limited resection is generally considered acceptable for early-stage lung ADC presenting as ground glass opacity-dominant (GGO) nodules [9, 10]. However, there is little evidence to support the appropriateness of limited resection as a treatment for patients with early-stage IMA.

Hence, we used the patients data from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the potential candidates with clinical stage IA IMA who were benefited from limited resection.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Data were obtained from patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgical treatment in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Tumor size ≤ 3 cm on computed tomography (CT) scans; (2) tumors that were pathologically diagnosed as pure IMA or mixed mucinous and nonmucinous ADC; and (3) aged between 20 and 80 years old. Patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma were excluded. Patients with multiple nodules or had the concomitant presence of other malignancies were also excluded. We also excluded the patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy or had history of malignant tumors. All the patients were staged according to the 8th TNM staging system [11]. The end date of follow-up was December 1, 2020.

SEER database. We used the SEER 18 Registry data including the Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2017 Sub (1973–2015 varying) for this analysis. This SEER database was queried for IMA of the lung from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 based on the 3rd edition codes for IMA of the lung (8253, 8254, 8480). Patients were included when the following inclusion criteria were met: T1a or T1b (tumor size ≤ 2 cm or 2–3 cm) based on AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 7th ed from column of SEER database, lobectomy, limited resection and presence of one primary cancer only. The age older than 80 and younger than 20 were also excluded.

Surgical treatment for the Shanghai pulmonary hospital cohort

In our hospital, patients with clinical stage IA lung mucinous ADC were more likely to have undergone lobectomy. However, limited resection was also performed after a comprehensive evaluation. There were mainly two indications of limited resection in our hospital. The main candidate group for limited resection was the patients deemed unfit or at high risks for a lobectomy, including underlying pulmonary disease and/or heart disease and advanced age, according to previous studies [12,13,14,15]. The second indication was that patients were required to meet all the following criteria according to previous studies: [16]: (i) ≤ 3 cm in maximum diameter with radiologically non-invasive appearance (consolidation/tumors ratio < 0.5), (ii) location within the outer third of the lung parenchyma.

For lobectomy, systemic lymph node dissection is mandatory, including hilar lymph node and at least three stations of mediastinal lymph node from 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9 for the right side and 4 L, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for the left side, respectively. Limited resection was included wedge resection and segmentectomy. Most of the patients underwent systemic lymph node dissection for segmentectomy. However, if patient conditions do not permit, it is acceptable to remove mediastinal lymph nodes during segmentectomy. For wedge resection, selective mediastinal lymph node dissection was accepted and the selective sample of the mediastinal lymph node was also allowed after a comprehensive evaluation by the surgeons [17].

A resection margin of more than 2 cm was ensured following a comprehensive preoperative examination and discussion before chosing the surgical strategy. And the pathologic diagnosis would check the resection margin for subsequent treatment decisions.

Radiological and pathological evaluation for the Shanghai pulmonary hospital cohort

All chest CT scans and tumor size were re-evaluated by two radiologists, respectively. When a disagreement occurred, a third senior radiologist was required for an accurate diagnosis. The size of the tumors was measured as the largest axial diameter of the lesion on the lung window setting [level, -500 Hounsfield unit (HU); width, 1350 HU].

All available hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were reviewed by two pathologists independently in SPH cohort. If disagreement occurred, the third senior pathologist would join the discussion to reach a final consensus. The criteria for histological subtyping were performed according to the 2015 WHO lung ADC classification [1]. The definition of IMA was tumors having columnar or goblet cells with abundant intracellular mucin and with lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, or solid pattern. Each histologic pattern was recorded in 5% increments. According to the percentage of mucinous and nonmucinous components, IMAs were divided into two groups: pure IMA (with > 90% invasive mucinous pattern) and mixed invasive mucinous and nonmucinous ADCs (with ≥ 10% of each pattern of mucinous and nonmucinous). Tumor size, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), and lymph node involvement were recorded as pathologic features.

Clinical follow-up and outcome for the Shanghai pulmonary hospital cohort

All the patients included in this study were regularly monitored for at least three years from the date of surgery, and the patients before December 1, 2016 were followed-up for more than five years. For the first two years, physical examination, chest CT and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements were performed at least twice per year. Thereafter, physical examinationand chest CT scans would be performed semiannually for years three through five post-surgery. Additional examinations, including radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain were performed when patients had any signs of recurrence or symptom occurred. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of surgery to the date of first recurrence or death, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All clinical data are either shown as mean ± standard deviation or number (percent values). The Pearson χ2 test was conducted to compare categorical variables, and an independent sample t test was used to compare continuous variables. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model were applied to evaluate predictive factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) for Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital corhort, lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort. All the statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY) and statistical significance was set as p < 0.05.

Result

The Shanghai pulmonary hospital cohort

Patient characteristics

A total of 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA were met our inclusion criteria. Among them, 316 patients (78.4%, 316/403) underwent lobectomy, and 87 patients (21.6%, 87/403) were treated by limited resection. Among limited resection group, 28 patients underwent segmentectomy and 59 patients underwent wedge resection. Patients were classified into two groups according to surgical types and the clinicopathological characteristics were summarized and compared in Table 1. There are no significant differences between patients in limited resection group and lobectomy group in terms of age (p = 0.156), sex (p = 0.149), smoking status (p = 0.626), CEA (p = 0.432), %predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1) (p = 0.103), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.083), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.103). Patients in the limited resection group had smaller tumor size than those in the lobectomy group. The median follow-up time was 46 months (range, 24 to 82 months) and 43 months (range, 21 to 80 months) in lobectomy and limited resection groups, respectively.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Stage IA Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Cohort
Full size table

374 (92.8%, 374/403) tumors were pure IMA, and 29 tumors (7.2%, 29/403) were mixed mucinous/nonmucinous ADC: 15 (51.7%,15/29) tumors with acinar pattern, 8 (27.6%, 8/29) tumors with papillary pattern, and 6 (20.7%, 6/29) tumors with acinar and papillary pattern (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Outcomes of patients with clinical stage IA invasive lung mucinous adenocarcinomas

The survival analysis by Log-rank test showed that patients who underwent lobectomy had a similar RFS (5-year RFS: 82.6% versus. 79.3%; p = 0.116) and OS (5-year OS: 88.3% versus. 86.2%; p = 0.235) than those who underwent limited resection (Fig. 1A, B). Patients with IMA > 2.1 to 3 cm had worse RFS (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%; p = 0.007) than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm, whereas similar OS was observed between the two groups (5-year OS: 83.9% versus. 89.8%; p = 0.105) (Fig. 1C, D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA stratified by surgical procedures and tumor size. (A) RFS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA. (B) OS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA. (C) RFS by tumor size for patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA. (D) OS by tumor size for patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA

Lob, lobectomy; Lim, limited resection

Full size image

In further multivariable Cox analysis, lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 4.204; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.126–8.315; p < 0.001) and IMA > 2.1 to 3 cm (HR, 1.286; 95% CI, 1.019–1.621; p = 0.033) were independent risk factors of worse RFS. In terms of OS, lymph node metastasis (HR, 4.497; 95% CI, 2.106–9.603; p < 0.001) was the only independent risk factor (Table 2).

Table 2 Cox Proportional-hazards Regression Model for Recurrence-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with IMA ≤ 3 cm of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Cohort (n = 403)
Full size table

Outcomes of patients with clinical stage IA invasive lung mucinous adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm

There were 266 patients in the subgroup of IMA ≤ 2 cm, including 67 patients who underwent limited resection and 199 patients who underwent lobectomy. The survival analysis by Log-rank test showed that patients undergoing lobectomy had a similar RFS (5-year RFS: 88.1% versus. 85.4%; p = 0.953) and OS (5-year OS: 89.9% versus. 89.6%; p = 0.552) than those who underwent limited resection. (Fig. 2A, B) Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that lymph node metastasis was the independent risk factor of worse RFS (HR, 6.981; 95% CI, 2.433–20.034; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 4.296; 95% CI, 1.291–14.297; p = 0.020) (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA stratified by surgical procedures and tumor size. (A) RFS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA ≤ 2 cm. (B) OS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA ≤ 2 cm. (C) RFS by surgical procedures for patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA > 2 to 3 cm. (D) OS by surgical procedures for patients with clinical stage IA lung IMA > 2 to 3 cm

Lob, lobectomy; Lim, limited resection

Full size image
Table 3 Cox Proportional-hazards Regression Model for Recurrence-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with IMA ≤ 2 cm (n = 266) and > 2 to 3 cm of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Cohort (n = 137)
Full size table

Outcomes of patients with clinical stage IA invasive lung mucinous adenocarcinomas 2–3 cm

137 patients were included in the subgroup of IMA > 2.1–3 cm, which 20 patients underwent limited resection and 117 patients underwent lobectomy. There was a significant difference in RFS between lobectomy and limited resection (5-year RFS: 77.8% versus. 50.0%; p = 0.007) in the group with IMA > 2.1–3 cm, however, similar OS were observed (5-year OS: 85.5% versus. 75.0%; p = 0.112) (Fig. 2C, D). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model reveals limited resection (HR, 2.417; 95% CI, 1.157–5.049; p = 0.019) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 3.444; 95% CI, 1.492–7.949; p = 0.004) were the independent risk of worse RFS. Lymph node metastasis (HR, 4.059; 95% CI, 1.495–11.025; p = 0.005) was the only independent risk of worse OS (Table 3).

The SEER cohort

Patient characteristics

We identified 480 patients from the SEER database who had stage T1 disease with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma 403 (403/480 84.0%) or mucinous bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma 68 (68/480 14.1%) or mixed mucinous and non-mucinous bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma 9 (9/480 1.9%). Among them, 376 (376/480 78.3%) were underwent lobectomy, and 104 (104/480 21.7%) were treated by limited resection. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 4. There are no significant differences between patients in limited resection group and lobectomy group in terms of sex (p = 0.741), age (p = 0.116), race/ethnicity (p = 0.965), tumor location (p = 0.331), and histology (p = 0.712). Patients in the limited resection group had smaller tumor size (p = 0.002) and fewer lymph nodes involvement (p = 0.005) than those in the lobectomy group.

Table 4 Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Stage IA Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Seer Cohort(n = 480)
Full size table

Outcomes of patients with invasive lung mucinous adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm

The survival analysis by log-rank test showed that patients undergoing lobectomy had a similar LCSS (5-year LCSS: 91.0% versus 91.1%; p = 0.703) and OS (5-year OS: 88.3% versus 84.8%; p = 0.830) than those who underwent limited resection. (Fig. 3A, B) Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that lymph node metastasis (HR, 8.234; 95% CI, 3.586–18.904; p < 0.001) was the independent risk factor of worse LCSS. And lymph node metastasis (HR, 7.778; 95% CI, 3.730-16.217; p < 0.001) was an independent predictive factor of worse OS.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage T1 lung IMA stratified by surgical procedures and tumor size. (A) LCSS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage T1 lung IMA ≤ 2 cm. (B) OS by surgical procedures in patients with clinical stage T1 lung IMA ≤ 2 cm. (C) LCSS by surgical procedures for patients with clinical stage T1 lung IMA > 2 to 3 cm. (D) OS by surgical procedures for patients with clinical stage T1 lung IMA > 2 to 3 cm

Lob, lobectomy; Lim, limited resection

Full size image

Outcomes of patients with invasive lung mucinous adenocarcinomas 2–3 cm

In the group with IMA > 2–3 cm, there was a significant difference in LCSS between lobectomy and limited resection (5-year LCSS: 92.8% versus 64.0%; p < 0.001), and similar OS were observed (5-year OS: 90.2% versus 60.0%; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3C, D). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model reveals limited resection (HR, 10.066; 95% CI, 3.571–28.376; p < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 14.346; 95% CI, 4.962–41.476; p < 0.001) were the independent risk of worse LCSS. Limited resection (HR, 8.527; 95% CI, 3.355–21.676; p < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 11.199; 95% CI, 4.188–29.950; p < 0.001) were independent risk of worse OS (Table 5).

Table 5 Cox Proportional-hazards Regression Model for Recurrence-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with IMA ≤ 2 cm (n = 302) and > 2 to 3 cm of SEER Cohort (n = 178)
Full size table

Discussion

Based on a special profile of clinical features, gene mutations, radiological presence, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcomes, IMA was regarded as a variant subtype of lung ADC in the 2015 WHO classification [1]. Although several retrospective studies observed the clinical characteristics and pathological features of IMA, the optimal surgical extent for early-stage IMA remains uncertain [4, 5, 18]. In the current study, the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital cohort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA from the cases of resected lung ADC. We found larger tumor size (> 2 to 3 cm versus ≤ 2 cm) and lymph node metastasis as independent predictors of poor RFS. In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, limited resection was associated with poor RFS compared to lobectomy. However, in the IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection achieved similar prognosis to lobectomy. In the SEER cohort, limited resection and lymph node invoement were both prognostic factors for LCSS and OS in IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup. Our findings indicated that patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm could be candidates for limited resection, whereas lobectomy should be recommended for IMA > 2 to 3 cm to avoid recurrence.

IMA was previously classified as a mucinous bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma (BAC) in the classification system of lung ADC [2, 19]. Radiographically, BAC present as GGO with/without a central solid region, including (1) a single focus ground-glass nodule, (2) multifocal lesions with the semblable appearance, or (3) dense pneumonic consolidation with mass containing prominent air-bronchograms. IMA exhibit a variety of BAC manifestations [20, 21]. The low invasive nudules usually show a higher proportion of GGO compoment in ADC. In order to minimize surgical trauma and preserve more pulmonary function, limited resection become a great choice for preinvasive and low risk lesions such as ADC in situ, minimally invasive ADC and lepidic predominant invasive ADC in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, it is natural to assume that tumors with better prognosis could be excised with a smaller resection method.

But on the other hand, the optimal surgical strategy for early-stage NSCLC remains controversial. Although lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection has been the standard surgical treatment for stage IA NSCLC [22,23,24], limited resection with great advantage aroused surgeon’s interest. In a previous randomized control trial, patients with peripheral NSCLC ≤ 2 cm that underwent limited resection retained more lung function than those who underwent lobectomy without a compromised prognosis [16]. Another meta-analysis revealed that patients with stage I lung cancer who underwent intentional limited resection achieved comparable survival with lobectomy [23]. In our study, patients with IMA ≤ 2 cm had no differences in prognosis between lobectomy and limited resection. Resently, a milestone randomized control trial, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802 trial [25], shows that patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≥ 0.5 peripheral NSCLC had a comparable OS and relapse-free survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy in 5 years. They also confirmed that segmentectomy had superiority in preserving pulmonary function (FEV 1.0) at 6 months and 1 year post operation.

Several studies have evaluated the survival difference between limited resection and lobectomy for BAC. Koike et al. [26] performed a prospective study and concluded that limited resection was a potentially curative surgical procedure as an alternative to lobectomy for patients with BAC. Compared to lobectomy, limited resection may offer additional benefits for patients with small size lung cancer in addition to survival. Limited resection allowed for preserving more lung capacity and affording the opportunity for the excision of a second pulmonary neoplasm [27]. Furthermore, limited resection has a significant lower incidence of postoperative complications than lobectomy [28]. Watanabe et al. reported that limited resection could be an appropriate treatment for early-stage BAC [29]. However, few studies have specifically investigated the role of limited resection in mucinous BAC. Our results show that the prognosis was similar between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with IMA ≤ 2 cm. Thus, these findings strongly support that limited resection is an alternative procedure for patients with IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Recently, limited studies have discussed about using imaging features to identify early-stage IMA [30]. Unfortunately, applying these imaging features to guide surgical management is still difficult due to their inaccuracy. Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis could be an effective method to guide surgical strategy for early-stage invasive lung ADC [31]. Walts et al. [32] found that the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis for invasive lung ADC was greater than 97%. Liu et al. [31] used frozen section diagnosis to guide limited resection for peripheral early-stage lung ADC and found a concordance rate of 96.6% between frozen section diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis. Thus, they concluded that intraoperative frozen section diagnosis could be a method to guide resection strategy for early-stage ADC. Furthermore, intraoperative frozen section can aid in surgical decisions. According to our research, when IMA ≤ 2 cm in preoperative CT discovered intraoperatively by frozen section, limited resection is permissible as long as a 2 cm resection margin ensured. If the IMA 2–3 cm cm in preoperative CT diagnosis intraoperatively by frozen section, a complementary lobectomy should be performed.

Lymph nodes involvement is an crucial prognostic factor in early-stage lung cancer [33, 34]. Regardless of whether the IMA ≤ 2 cm or 2–3 cm, the status of the lymph nodes remains the most significant factor influencing prognosis in our study. A cautious and comprehensive preoperative diagnosis and staging of lymph nodes will significantly benefit the prognosis of early-stage IMA. When the patient’s lymph node is suspected to be positive in preoperative CT, further examinations such as positron emission tomography (PET) and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) will be performed. It is a rare occurrence to have unexpected macroscopic nodal involvement discovered intraoperatively after negative CT/PET-CT and negative EBUS [35]. Even if unsuspected N2 discovered intraoperatively, a comprehensive adjuvant therapy should be administered for a more favorable the postoperative prognosis [36].

We acknowledge that there were some limitations in our study. First, there were insufficient cases that underwent limited resection to allow us for further analysis of the risk factors of prognosis between segmentectomy and wedge resection. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the patients selection bias biases were unavoidable. Future prospective studies with less patient selection bias will be conducted to further validation of the impact of surgical methods on the prognosis of IMA. Second, The relative short observation period may reduce the power to analyze the difference in prognosis. Finally, it’s difficult to diagnose a certain histopathological subtype of lung tumor based on preoperative CT alone in clinical practice. Use of frozen section for the diagnosis of IMA may remedy this limitation in future studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm could be candidates for limited resection, whereas limited resection should be performed cautiously in IMA > 2 to 3 cm. Future studies with larger sample size are needed to verify the appropriate surgical extent for IMA.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

ADC:

Adenocarcinoma

IMA:

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinom

GGO:

Ground-glass opacity

SEER:

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

CT:

Computed tomography

VPI:

Visceral pleural invasion

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

LCSS:

Lung cancer–specific survival

OS:

Overall survival

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

BAC:

Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PET:

Positron emission tomography

EBUS:

Endobronchial ultrasound

References

  1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:1243–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:244–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang DH, Sholl LM, Rojas-Rudilla V, et al. KRAS and NKX2-1 mutations in Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee HY, Cha MJ, Lee KS, et al. Prognosis in Resected Invasive Mucinous adenocarcinomas of the lung: related factors and comparison with Resected Nonmucinous Adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1064–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo J, Wang R, Han B, et al. Analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of stage I invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:1837–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wisnivesky JP, Henschke CI, Swanson S, et al. Limited resection for the treatment of patients with stage IA lung cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:550–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhong C, Fang W, Mao T, et al. Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:362–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blasberg JD, Pass HI, Donington JS. Sublobar resection: a movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1583–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshida Y, Manaka T, Nitadori JI, et al. A comparison between 2- and 3-dimensional approaches to solid component measurement as radiological criteria for sublobar resection in lung adenocarcinoma = 2 cm in size</at. Surg Today. 2019;49:828–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiang XH, Hsu HH, Hsieh MS, et al. Propensity-matched analysis comparing Survival after Sublobar Resection and Lobectomy for cT1N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;27:703–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM Stage groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:39–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kocaturk CI, Gunluoglu MZ, Cansever L, et al. Survival and prognostic factors in surgically resected synchronous multiple primary lung cancers. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sihoe AD, Van Schil P. Non-small cell lung cancer: when to offer sublobar resection. Lung Cancer. 2014;86:115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koike T, Yamato Y, Yoshiya K, et al. Intentional limited pulmonary resection for peripheral T1 N0 M0 small-sized lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:924–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koike T, Koike T, Yoshiya K, et al. Risk factor analysis of locoregional recurrence after sublobar resection in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:372–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koike T, Koike T, Sato S, et al. Lobectomy and limited resection in small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:3265–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, et al. Sublobar resection for lung adenocarcinoma meeting node-negative criteria on preoperative imaging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM classification of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1204–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shim HS, Kenudson M, Zheng Z, et al. Unique Genetic and Survival Characteristics of Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:1156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandara DR, Aberle D, Lau D, et al. Radiographic imaging of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: screening, patterns of presentation and response assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:S20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D, et al. Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology. 2013;266:62–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, et al. Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:eS278–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S, et al. Could less be more?-A systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer. 2015;89:121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:16–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimoyama R, Tsutani Y, Wakabayashi M, et al. A multi-institutional randomized phase III trial comparing anatomical segmentectomy and wedge resection for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in high-risk operable patients: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1909 (ANSWER study). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50:1209–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koike T, Togashi K, Shirato T, et al. Limited resection for noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative pathologic examination. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1106–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:615–22. discussion 622 – 613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ichinose J, Yamamoto H, Aokage K et al. Real-world perioperative outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 63.

  29. Watanabe S, Watanabe T, Arai K, et al. Results of wedge resection for focal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma showing pure ground-glass attenuation on computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1071–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Raz DJ, Kim JY, Jablons DM. Diagnosis and treatment of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007;13:290–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu S, Wang R, Zhang Y, et al. Precise diagnosis of Intraoperative Frozen section is an effective method to Guide Resection Strategy for Peripheral Small-Sized Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walts AE, Marchevsky AM. Root cause analysis of problems in the frozen section diagnosis of in situ, minimally invasive, and invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:1515–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dezube AR, Mazzola E, Bravo-Iñiguez CE, et al. Analysis of Lymph Node Sampling Minimums in Early Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33:834–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Darling GE. Lymph node assessment in early stage non-small cell lung cancer lymph node dissection or sampling? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:716–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang CJ, D’Amico TA, Berry MF. Frozen section of N2 nodes is invaluable whenever unexpected suspicious operative findings are encountered. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1643–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang CF, Kumar A, Gulack BC, et al. Long-term outcomes after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer when unsuspected pN2 disease is found: a National Cancer Data Base analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:1380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in this study.

Funding

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802256, NSFC91959126), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (15411968400 and 14411962600), Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR1021B & SHDC22020218 & SHDC2020CR1021B), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202040322).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China

    Weikang Lin, Hang Su, Long Xu, Tingting Wang, Long Wang, Xuefei Hu, Deping Zhao, Yuming Zhu, Haifeng Wang, Gening Jiang, Dong Xie & Chang Chen

  2. Clinical Center for Thoracic Surgery Research, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Weikang Lin, Hang Su, Long Xu, Tingting Wang, Long Wang, Xuefei Hu, Deping Zhao, Yuming Zhu, Haifeng Wang, Gening Jiang, Dong Xie & Chang Chen

  3. Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Huikang Xie

Authors
  1. Weikang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hang Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huikang Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Long Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tingting Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Long Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xuefei Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Deping Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuming Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Haifeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gening Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dong Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Chang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the Surgical Thoracic Alliance of Rising Star Group

Contributions

Conception and design: Weikang Lin; Hang Su; Huikang Xie; Yunlang She; Tingting Wang; Long Wang; Gening Jiang; Dong Xie; Chang Chen. Collection and assembly of data: Weikang Li; Hang Su; Huikang Xie; Yunlang She; Tingting Wang; Xuefei Hu; Yuming Zhu; Haifeng Wang. Data analysis and interpretation: Weikang Lin; Hang Su; Huikang Xie; Long Wang; Deping Zhao; Gening Jiang; Dong Xie; Chang Chen. Manuscript writing: All authors. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong Xie or Chang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Shanghai pulmonary Hospital ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for research and publication from the patients was obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, W., Su, H., Xie, H. et al. Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma. World J Surg Onc 22, 109 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03387-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03387-5

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us