Skip to main content
Download PDF

Re-stratification of patients with copy-number low endometrial cancer by clinicopathological characteristics

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 21, Article number: 332 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To stratify patients with copy-number low (CNL) endometrial cancer (EC) by clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

EC patients who underwent surgery between June 2018 and June 2022 at Peking University People’s Hospital were included and further classified according to TCGA molecular subtyping: POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability high (MSI-H), CNL, and copy-number high (CNH). Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of CNL patients were retrospectively reviewed. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform univariate and multivariate analysis, and independent risk factors were identified. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to overall survival (OS) were screened based on the transcriptome of CNL cases from the TCGA program. Finally, a nomogram was established, with an accuracy analysis performed.

Results

(1) A total of 279 EC patients were included, of whom 168 (60.2%) were in the CNL group. A total of 21 patients had recurrence and 6 patients deceased, and no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) was exhibited among the four molecular subtypes (P = 0.104), but that in overall survival (OS) was statistically significant (P = 0.036). (2) CNL patients were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups, and significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between the two groups in terms of pathological subtype, FIGO stage, ER, PR, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All the above factors were included in univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, among which pathological subtype, PR, and HDL-C were statistically different (P < 0.05), resulting in three independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients in the CNL group. (3) By comparing the transcriptome of tumor tissues between living and deceased CNL patients from the TCGA database, 903 (4.4%) DEGs were screened, with four lipid metabolism pathways significantly enriched. Finally, a nomogram was established, and internal cross-validation was performed, showing good discrimination accuracy with an AUC of 0.831 and a C-index of 0.748 (95% CI 0.444–1.052). (4) According to the established nomogram and the median total score (85.89), patients were divided into the high score group (n = 85) and low score group (n = 83), and the 8 patients with recurrence were all in the high score group. Survival analysis was performed between the two groups, and the difference in RFS was statistically significant (P = 0.010).

Conclusion

In the CNL group of EC patients, pathological subtype, PR, and HDL-C were independent prognostic risk factors, the nomogram established based upon which had a good predictive ability for the recurrence risk of patients with CNL EC.

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the three major cancers of the female reproductive system, with an incidence rate ranking 4th among all cancers and showing high heterogeneity in histological, genetic, and molecular characteristics [1]. In 2013, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Project [2] applied a multi-omic analysis and re-classified EC into four molecular subtypes, including POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), copy-number low (CNL), and copy-number high (CNH), which have started a new era of diagnosis and treatment by combining histopathological characteristics and molecular subtyping [2]. However, the large proportion of patients in the CNL group [3] (especially in the Chinese population [4], the absence of specific molecular patterns, and the large difference in prognosis, greatly require further refinement of stratification to guide the management of CNL patients. In this study, we presented a retrospective analysis of EC patients who underwent TCGA molecular subtyping in our institution in recent years to explore the feasibility of re-stratification for CNL patients based on clinicopathological characteristics.

Materials and methods

Study subjects and data collection

  1. 1.

    Study subjects: a total of 279 patients with EC who underwent surgical treatment and molecular subtyping between June 2018 and June 2022 at Peking University People’s Hospital were collected. Patients’ clinicopathological data including age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, metabolic syndrome-related comorbidities, comorbid malignancies of other organs, family history of cancer, preoperative serum CA125 and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels, stage, pathological subtype, tumor grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis, tumor maximum diameter, and immunohistochemical parameters (including ER, PR, etc.) et al. were collected from the medical record system. All pathological reviews were finished in the Department of Pathology of Peking University People’s Hospital by two independent gynecologic pathologists. The staging was determined according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging system [5]. Histopathological classification was performed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2014 classification system. The grading of tumors was in accordance with the FIGO criteria [6]. This study was approved by the biomedical ethics committee of Peking University People's Hospital, with informed consent from all participants. To explore differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with overall survival (OS) in CNL patients, we also extracted mRNA expression profiles from the Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) database through cBioPortal [7, 8].

  2. 2.

    We tried to control selection bias by expanding the sample size as much as possible and strictly screening the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria: The pathological diagnosis was endometrial cancer; There was no abnormal liver and kidney function and bone marrow suppression before the operation. The subjects voluntarily joined the study, signed the informed consent, had good compliance, and cooperated with the follow-up. Exclusion criteria: previous history of other malignancies or concurrent malignancies; Unwilling to accept follow-up.

  3. 3.

    Follow-up: patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years after completing treatment and every 6 months for 3 years thereafter. The follow-up contents mainly included imaging (including pelvic abdominal ultrasound or CT) examination and serum tumor marker. The last follow-up date was December 31, 2022, and 279 patients were followed up for a median of 16.9 months (range 0.7–70.7 months) postoperatively, with the rate of follow-up being 100%.

Molecular subtyping and immunohistochemical detection

  1. 1.

    Molecular subtyping: endometrial cancer tissue and blood samples from patients were collected, sequencing was performed using a high-throughput sequencer (Illumina products, USA), and sequencing data were analyzed using a high-throughput sequencing data analysis system (Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.). Based on the sequencing results, in this study, we refer to the 2013 TCGA molecular classification method [2] to classify the patients into four subtypes: POLE ultramutated, MSI-H, CNL, and CNH, and the specific subtyping was performed using Trans-PORTEC [9], as follows: (1) the mutation status of the POLE gene was detected if the pathogenic mutation of the POLE gene was judged to be POLE ultramutated; (2) a microsatellite instability (MSI) value ≥ 0.4 in a sample wild-type for the POLE gene was judged as MSI-H type; (3) TP53 mutation status was determined in microsatellite stable patients and CNH and cases without mutation were judged as CNL [10].

  2. 2.

    Immunohistochemistry: ER, PR, p53, and Ki-67 expression were detected by immunohistochemistry with an envision kit purchased from Zymed (USA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data were tested for normality and those with a normal distribution were given \(\overline{x }\)±s indicated, by independent samples t-test or one-way ANOVA; Measures that are not normally distributed are presented as the median (25th–75th percentile) [M(P25–p75)] with the nonparametric Mann‑Whitney U test or Kruskal‑Wallis H rank sum test. The counting data were tested for the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact probability method. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors associated with prognosis in the CNL group; These factors were determined with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). As for the TCGA database, DEGs of tumor tissues between living and deceased patients were screened by the ‘limma’ package and focused on whether DEG was related to glucose, sex hormones, or lipid metabolism pathways [11].

The final model selection for the nomogram was performed by a backward step-down selection process using a threshold of P < 0.05, and factors without clinical significance were also excluded from the model. ROC curves were used to find the cut-off value and evaluate the discriminatory ability of the model. All statistical analyses were 2-tailed and P < 0 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. The DEG analysis, nomogram, and time-dependent ROC were established with R (http://www.R-project.org) and EmpowerStats software (www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions, Inc. Boston, MA, USA).

Results

Clinicopathological and molecular features of EC cases

A total of 279 patients were included, of whom 15 (5.4%) were in the POLE ultramutated group, 49 (17.6%) in MSI-H, 168 (60.2%) in CNL, and 47 (16.8%) in CNH (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The proportion of four molecular subtypes in the total EC cohort, the number of patients with recurrence and death. The recurrence rates and mortality contrasts by molecular subtyping

Full size image

Postoperative follow-up as of December 31, 2022, a total of 21 patients had recurrence, including 0 in the POLE ultramutated group, 6 in MSI-H (12.2%), 8 in CNL (4.8%), and 7 in CNH (14.9%) (Fig. 1B, D). A total of 6 patients died, including 0 in the POLE ultramutated group, 4 in MSI-H (8.2%), 1 in CNL (0.6%), and 1 in CNH (2.1%) (Fig. 1C, E).

The survival analysis showed that the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) of patients in POLE ultramutated group was 100%, and the 3-year RFS of patients in MSI‑H, CNL, and CNH groups were 79.1%, 81.2%, and 55.8%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.104) (Fig. 2A); the 1-year OS of patients in the POLE ultramutated group was 100%, and the 3-year OS of patients in MSI‑H, CNL, and CNH groups were 84.0%, 99.4%, and 80.0%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.036) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier analysis for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in EC patients stratified by molecular subtyping

Full size image

Because of the large proportion of patients and the large difference in prognosis in the CNL group, they were further analyzed. Clinicopathological data of patients in the recurrence (n = 8) and non-recurrence (n = 160) groups are shown in Table 1. There were 8 non-endometrioid carcinoma patients: 2 patients in the recurrence group: 1 serous carcinoma and 1 undifferentiated carcinoma; 6 patients in the non-recurrence group: 2 serous carcinomas, 1 mixed carcinoma, 1 clear cell carcinoma, 1 carcinosarcoma, 1 mucinous carcinoma. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in surgical approach and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy, but significant differences were exhibited in pathological subtype, FIGO stage, ER, PR, HbA1c, and HDL-C (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the CNL subgroup
Full size table

Predictors for survival in the CNL group

The pathological subtype, FIGO stage, ER, PR, HbA1c, and HDL-C were included in the univariate and multivariate Cox regression model analysis (Table 2), in the multivariate Cox analysis, the pathological subtype (HR 0.053, 95% CI 0.008–0.363), PR (HR 0.969, CI 0.945–0.994), and HDL-C (HR 0.059, CI 0.005–0.646) were statistically different, thus the three factors were independent risk factors for prognosis in the CNL group. Further transcriptomic analysis of the TCGA database screened 903 (4.4%) DEGs between living and deceased CNL patients (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1), Gene Ontology (GO) analysis based on which enriched 141 pathways in the biological process (BP) group (Supplementary Table 2), with 4 pathways associated with lipid metabolism (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Results of multivariate Cox regression analysis
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Various pathways associated with lipid metabolism were enriched when comparing transcriptome of tumor tissue from living and deceased CNL patients

Full size image

Construction of a nomogram for the prediction of recurrence in the CNL group

Based on results from the multivariate Cox regression model, a nomogram was constructed and incorporated clinical variables, including pathological subtype, PR, and HDL-C. For individualized prediction, draw an upward vertical line to the “points” bar to calculate the total points corresponding to the patient’s characteristics. Then, draw a downward vertical line from the “total points” line based on the sum to calculate the risk of recurrence 20 months after surgery (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Nomogram predicting the recurrence of CNL group

Full size image

Accuracy of the nomogram

The nomogram was cross-validated internally by the 500 repetitions of bootstrap sample corrections. For the prediction of the recurrence of the CNL group, the nomogram showed good discrimination accuracy with an AUC of 0.831 and a C-index of 0.748 (95% CI 0.444–1.052) in internal validation (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Receiver operating characteristic curves of internal verification corresponding nomogram to predict the recurrence of CNL group

Full size image

Based on the established nomogram, the median total score of each CNL patient (n = 168) was calculated to be 85.89, and patients were divided into low (total score < 85.89, n = 83) and high (total score ≥ 85.89, n = 85) score groups according to which. All 8 patients with recurrence were in the high-score group. Survival analysis was performed and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.010) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Kaplan–Meier analysis for RFS in CNL group with low score group and high score group

Full size image

Discussion

Since 2013, TCGA-based molecular subtyping has provided an important reference value for judging the prognosis and treatment of EC patients, shows good application prospects, and has been included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines [12] to recommend clinical application. In this study, the enrolled EC patients were molecularly typed according to TCGA criteria [2] by detecting POLE mutation, microsatellite stability status, and TP53 mutation status using high-throughput sequencing technology, the clinicopathological characteristics of EC patients were retrospectively analyzed, and prognosis analysis was performed, because of the large proportion of patients in the CNL group and the great difference in prognosis, further analysis was performed to identify 3 independent risk factors for prognosis. Nomograms [13,14,15], which is an intuitive and easily readable graphical chart based on the results of the logistic regression or Cox regression, could accurately predict the probability of occurrence of an event. For clinical application, the nomogram could incorporate patient individual characteristics and need further validation by cross-validation and bootstrapping methods. In the current study, we constructed a nomogram based on three clinicopathological parameters to predict the risk of recurrence for patients in the CNL group. The exploration of re-stratification of patients in the CNL group by clinicopathological characteristics was initially explored.

Endometrial cancer molecular subtyping and clinicopathological characteristics

In 2013, TCGA project [2] performed an integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic study of 373 endometrial cancer patients, including 307 endometrioid, 53 serous, and 13 mixed carcinomas, and classified endometrial cancers into four molecular subtypes: POLE ultramutated (7%), MSI‒H (28%), CNL (39%), and CNH (26%), Among them, POLE ultramutated type had the best prognosis [16], MSI‒H patients and CNL patients had the intermediate prognosis, while CNH patients had the worst prognosis. In 2020, TCGA molecular typing assays were first incorporated into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines; In the same year, molecular typing of endometrial cancer was included in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors of the female reproductive organs. Molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer is becoming more widely used.

Molecular subtyping was different and also brought about differences in clinicopathological and immunomolecular features, and the study showed that the stage, pathological type, and grade of the four molecular subtypes patients were all statistically different, with the POLE ultramutated, MSI-H, and CNL subtypes more prone to early clinical stage (higher proportion in FIGO stage I–II) and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, while the CNH type patients were more III-IV and non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma at diagnosis. In endometrioid adenocarcinoma, the POLE ultramutated and CNL subtypes are mainly highly differentiated. The MSI and CNH subtypes are mostly low and medium differentiated. The positive expression rate of PD-L1 in patients with the MSI-H subtype was significantly higher than that in patients with POLE ultramutated, CNL, and CNH subtypes.

However, currently used molecular typing still has certain limitations. A large proportion of endometrial cancer patients are classified as CNL type [17], limiting the use of molecular subtyping for prognosis determination and treatment selection in these patients.

Thus, in recent years, numerous studies have been developed to refine the clinical management and personalization of patient therapy with EC, considering not only traditional prognostic factors but also an innovative molecular analysis with the aim of defining different classes of risk and developing therapies targeted to the molecules involved in carcinogenesis [18].

The 2021 joint guidelines of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) for the management of patients with EC encourage molecular classification, especially in high-grade tumors, and propose a new prognostic risk stratification based on both histological and molecular features [19]. However, how the molecular signature can be integrated with classic pathological factors is still under investigation.

Recent studies [20] have shown that LVSI has a prognostic value independent of TCGA signature, as well as age and adjuvant treatment, increasing the risk of death of any cause, death due to EC, and recurrent or progressive disease by 1.5–2 times. Deep myometrial invasion has been shown to affect the risk of recurrence independently from the TCGA groups, but not the risk of death of any cause [21]. In addition, there are other histopathological features, not considered in the current guidelines, that were proposed as possible independent prognostic factors, such as microcystic, elongated, and fragmented (MELF) patterns of invasion and tumor budding [22,23,24]. The prognostic significance of these factors, their reproducibility, and their possible integration into the current risk stratification system require further investigation.

Endometrial cancer and metabolic syndrome

Studies [25, 26] have shown that obesity and metabolic abnormal diseases such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperinsulinemia are associated with endometrial cancer incidence, adverse pathological features, and poor prognosis. Epidemiological studies have shown that overweight patients (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) have a 2.45-fold higher risk of developing EC and diabetic patients a 2.12-fold higher risk [27]. In addition, obesity-associated insulin resistance, sedentary lifestyle, Lynch syndrome, nulliparity, early menarche, and anovulation are potential risk factors for EC. Among them, insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) promote EC cell proliferation and migration through PI3K/Akt and RAS/MAPK pathways [28].

Another study from our unit [26] showed that Metabolic syndrome (Mets) was strongly associated with advanced-stage, high-grade, positive lymph node metastasis, LVSI positivity, and deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer patients, in which HDL-C was an independent risk factor for EC. To further evaluate the ability of HDL-C to predict the prognosis of EC patients, ROC analysis was performed, and the areas under the curve (AUC) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.626, 0.599, and 0.648, respectively. Based on HDL-C, grade, and stage, nomograms were constructed to predict the 1- and 3-year survival rates of EC patients. And the prediction performance is good.

Therefore, several metabolic-related indexes including FBG, FINS, HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C were included in this study to conclude that HDL-C is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients in the CNL group. For the re-stratification of CNL patients at the molecular level, we also designed a transcriptomic analysis based on tumor tissues from the TCGA database. We found 903 DEGs between EC from living and deceased CNL patients (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1), and 4 lipid metabolism pathways were enriched (Fig. 4), suggesting the role of lipid metabolism in the progress of CNL EC and the rationality of incorporating molecular features into the re-stratification of CNL EC. However, no glucose or sex hormone metabolism pathways were enriched, probably due to the relatively small number of total CNL patients (n = 149) and those with recurrence (n = 12) in the TCGA database. However, given the relatively large proportion of CNL patients in EC patients from China [4] and the wide application of second-generation sequencing (or even single-cell RNA sequencing) in scientific research [29], it is believed that a practical re-stratification strategy combining clinicopathological and molecular in CNL patients will soon be proposed.

The endometrial cancer immune microenvironment

In endometrial cancer, as in many cancers, the immune microenvironment plays an important role in cancer progression and therapeutic response. This includes both tumor-stroma interactions and tumor-infiltrating immune cell interactions. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is composed of immune cells, mesenchymal cells, endothelial cells, inflammatory mediators, and extracellular matrix molecules [30]. The occurrence and development of EC are closely related to the regulation of the TIME. Through a series of mechanisms, tumor cells eventually escape the surveillance of the immune system and inhibit the cytotoxic effects of immune cells [31].

A series of recent studies have immunophenotyped EC according to immune-related genes or immune cell infiltration. Included: Li and Wan [32] defined four immunophenotypes, C1(immunodepression), C2(IFN‐ɣ dominant type), C3(inflammatory type), and C4(immunologically balanced type), using immune-related gene signatures from the TCGA database combined with gene-set variant analysis and hierarchical clustering. Cai et al. [33] clustered the samples according to the infiltration of immune cells in tumor tissues and obtained three subpopulations with high, intermediate, and low immune cell infiltration, namely, C I, C II, C III, among which C I and C II patients performed adjuvant treatment better. Another study from our group [10], combining molecular subtyping with the immune microenvironment, explored the immune microenvironment characteristics of different molecular subtyping, in which the tumor mutation burden (TMB) levels of POLE mutant and MSI-H cases were significantly higher than that of the other two subtypes (P < 0.001). He combined POLE mutant and MSI-H subtypes into the TMB high (TMB-H) subtype. The TMB-H subtype showed a high degree of infiltration of CD8 + T cells. Concluded that EC of TMB-H, no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and TP53 mutant subtypes displayed phenotypes of the normal immune response, absence of immune infiltration, and suppressed immune response, respectively. These features may provide mechanistic explanations for the differences in patients’ prognosis and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapies among different endometrial cancer subtypes.

These studies all illustrate that the immune microenvironment and immunophenotyping may be the next areas we should focus on, and combining molecular subtyping and immune signature may be more helpful in guiding the prognosis of patients and selecting the patients who are suitable for immunotherapy, which will facilitate a more individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients. Therefore, our group will further incorporate tumor tissue immune microenvironment indicators in the future to make immune scores for patients, strive to combine multi-dimensional indicators, establish an early warning model of endometrial cancer prognosis, and implement a precision stratified diagnosis and treatment for patients. Limitation of this study: on the one hand, this study was retrospective and included insufficient cases, some missing data, insufficient follow-up time, and a low number of patients with recurrence and death, leading to possible bias in the results. The established model lacks external validation and awaits further validation. On the other hand, this study only explored the effect of clinical indicators on prognosis and did not explore the deep mechanism, which was the focus of our next research.

Conclusion

In this study, further stratification of endometrial cancer patients with CNL type was explored and attempted, three independent risk factors including pathological type, PR, and HDL-C were sought, based on which a nomogram was constructed and validated for accuracy. This model can be quite instructive for the prognosis of patients.

Availability of data and materials

All data of this research are from Peking University People's Hospital databases, and algorithms and annotated data in this research can be requested from the corresponding author based on academic collaboration.

Abbreviations

EC:

Endometrial cancer

POLE:

Polymerase epsilon

MSI-H:

High microsatellite instability

CNH:

Copy number high

CNL:

Copy number low

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

OS:

Overall survival

BMI:

Body mass index

LVSI:

Lymph‑vascular space invasion

ER:

Estrogen receptor

PR:

Progesterone receptor

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

FINS:

Fasting insulin

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

NCCN:

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the curve

C-index:

Concordance Index

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao LY, Dai YB, Li LW, et al. Application and clinical significance of TCGA molecular classification in endometrial cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021;56(10):697–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zong LJ, Xiang Y, Yu SN, et al. Expression and significance of immune checkpoint B7-homolog 4 in endometrial cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022;57(12):921–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):103–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soslow RA, Tornos C, Park KJ, et al. Endometrial carcinoma diagnosis: use of FIGO grading and genomic subcategories in clinical practice: recommendations of the international society of gynecological pathologists. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019;38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S64-s74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):pl1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stelloo E, Bosse T, Nout RA, et al. Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative. Modern Pathol. 2015;28(6):836–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai Y, Zhao L, Hua D, et al. Tumor immune microenvironment in endometrial cancer of different molecular subtypes: evidence from a retrospective observational study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1035616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bradley K, et al. NCCN guidelines® Insights: uterine neoplasms, version 3.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(8):888–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tendulkar RD, Agrawal S, Gao T, et al. Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(30):3648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):e173–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1499–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Raffone A, Travaglino A, Mascolo M, et al. TCGA molecular groups of endometrial cancer: pooled data about prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(2):374–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Molecular classification of the PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer: impact on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(29):3388–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. GoliaD’Augè T, Cuccu I, Santangelo G, et al. Novel insights into molecular mechanisms of endometrial diseases. Biomolecules. 2023;13(3):499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D, et al. Lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a prognostic factor independent from molecular signature. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(1):192–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D, et al. Prognostic value of myometrial invasion and TCGA groups of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(2):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. He D, Wang H, Dong Y, et al. POLE mutation combined with microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion in endometrial carcinomas might be associated with poor survival in Chinese women. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(1):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Santoro A, Angelico G, Inzani F, et al. Pathological features, immunoprofile and mismatch repair protein expression status in uterine endometrioid carcinoma: focus on MELF pattern of myoinvasion. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(2):338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rau TT, Bettschen E, Büchi C, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma within distinct molecular subgroups. Modern Pathol. 2021;34(1):222–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Özdemir S, Batmaz G, Ates S, et al. Relation of metabolic syndrome with endometrial pathologies in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(9):725–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang X, Li X, Dong Y, et al. Effects of metabolic syndrome and its components on the prognosis of endometrial cancer. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:780769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387(10023):1094–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mu N, Zhu Y, Wang Y, et al. Insulin resistance: a significant risk factor of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):751–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren X, Liang J, Zhang Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis highlights origin and pathological process of human endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen P, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Identification of prognostic immune-related genes in the tumor microenvironment of endometrial cancer. Aging. 2020;12(4):3371–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lei X, Lei Y, Li JK, et al. Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment: biological functions and roles in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2020;470:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li BL, Wan XP. Prognostic significance of immune landscape in tumour microenvironment of endometrial cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(14):7767–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cai Y, Chang Y, Liu Y. Multi-omics profiling reveals distinct microenvironment characterization of endometrial cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Developmental Program of China (Program Nos. 2022YFC2704303). Special Scientific Research Project for Health Development in the Capital under Grant number 2022-1-4081. Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research, CFH 2022-2Z-4086. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 81972426).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

    Li Liwei, Li He, Shen Zhihui, Wang Zhiqi & Wang Jianliu

  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Dai Yibo

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

    Zhao Luyang

  4. Department of Pathology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

    Kang Nan & Shen Danhua

  5. The Big Data and Public Policy Laboratory, School of Government, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Wang Junzhu

Authors
  1. Li Liwei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dai Yibo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhao Luyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shen Zhihui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kang Nan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shen Danhua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wang Junzhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wang Zhiqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wang Jianliu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Wang Zhiqi; Li Liwei Methodology: Li Xingchen; Wang Zhiqi; Wang Jianliu Formal analysis and investigation: Li Liwei; Li He; Dai Yibo; Zhao Luyang; Shen Zhihui; Wang Junzhu; Shen Danhua; Kang Nan Writing—original draft preparation: Li Liwei Writing—review and editing: Li Liwei; Li He; Wang Zhiqi Resources: Dai Yibo; Zhao Luyang; Shen Danhua; Kang Nan; Wang Zhiqi Supervision: Wang Zhiqi; Wang Jianliu All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wang Zhiqi or Wang Jianliu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to data abstraction by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital and written informed consent was also obtained from individual participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure S1.

DEGs between living and deceased CNL patients from TCGA database.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table S1.

DEGs between living and deceased CNL patients from TCGA database.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table S2.

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liwei, L., He, L., Yibo, D. et al. Re-stratification of patients with copy-number low endometrial cancer by clinicopathological characteristics. World J Surg Onc 21, 332 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03229-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03229-w

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us