Skip to main content
Download PDF

Application of MFI-5 in severe complications and unfavorable outcomes after radical resection of colorectal cancer

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 21, Article number: 307 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Frailty is considered a characteristic manifestation of physiological decline in multiple organ systems, which significantly increases the vulnerability of elderly individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. While studies have demonstrated that the 11-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) can effectively predict adverse outcomes following radical resection of CRC, there is a lack of research on the applicability of the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) within this patient population.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, we examined a cohort of CRC patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone radical resection. For each patient, we calculated their mFI-5 score, considering a score of ≥ 2 as an indication of frailty. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between the mFI-5 and adverse outcomes as well as postoperative complications.

Results

Patients with an mFI-5 score ≥ 2 exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious postoperative complications (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.001) and experienced a longer hospital stay [19.00 (15.00–24.50) vs. 17.00 (14.00–20.00); P < 0.05]. Notably, an mFI-5 score greater than 2 emerged as an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications (odds ratio: 2.297; 95% confidence interval: 1.216 to 4.339; P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mFI-5 score displayed predictive capabilities for severe postoperative complications with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.629 (95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.707; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The mFI-5 demonstrates a high level of sensitivity in predicting serious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and mortality following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma. As a practical clinical assessment tool, the mFI-5 enables the identification of high-risk patients and facilitates preoperative optimization.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a digestive tract disease that poses a significant threat to human health. According to the latest statistics from 2020, it ranks third in terms of incidence rate and second in terms of mortality rate among malignancies worldwide [1]. Elderly patients often experience varying degrees of organ degeneration, and they are particularly susceptible to underlying diseases such as lung infections, coronary heart disease, reduced body reserves, surgical trauma, postoperative complications, and even death. These factors can have adverse effects on prognosis and recovery [2, 3]. Recent research by Tsutomu et al. has demonstrated a significant increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates among patients with sarcopenia, which is one of the manifestations of weakness [4]. Consequently, there is a need for preoperative risk stratification and perioperative clinical consultation specifically tailored to elderly CRC patients (age ≥ 65 years) to improve the prognosis of radical CRC surgery [5, 6].

To better capture the cumulative physical deterioration and deficits, the Canadian Study of Health and Aging introduced a less complex frailty index known as the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index (CSHA-FI) [6]. In 2013, a modified frailty index (mFI) was developed by aligning the CSHA-FI with 11 variables collected by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) [7]. Similar to the CSHA-FI, mFI-11 has been validated as a reliable predictor of postoperative outcomes [8,9,10,11]. More recently, a simpler and less time-consuming mFI-5 has been developed [12]. The mFI-5 has undergone validation and demonstrated significant agreement with the mFI-11 in the context of upper gastrointestinal and multiorgan resections [13, 14]. The five comorbidities included in the mFI-5 are diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or pneumonia, hypertension requiring medication, and non-independent functional status. Each preoperative comorbidity is assigned a value of 1, resulting in total values ranging from 0 to 5. In terms of predicting poor postoperative prognosis, the mFI-5 has been validated and shown to have significant agreement with the mFI-11 in the context of upper orthopedics and multiorgan resections [15,16,17,18,19]. Early identification of frail patients and prompt intervention for diagnosis and treatment align with the theory of perioperative applications aimed at enhancing postoperative recovery [20, 21].

In numerous surgical areas, preoperatively assessable metrics have been found to significantly correlate with important postoperative metrics, such as hospital length of stay (LOS), cost, and unplanned readmissions [2, 22,23,24]. While previous assessment models have provided guidance, their limited clinical integration and slow implementation in practice have severely restricted their practical utility. In contrast, mFI-5, which can be readily identified in clinical screening settings, has demonstrated similar performance and utility compared to traditional predictive health-related assessment models [8, 12, 16]. In this study, we investigated the predictive role of the mFI-5 for serious complications and adverse outcomes following radical CRC surgery in elderly patients.

Materials and methods

General information

A total of 208 elderly patients, aged ≥ 65 years, who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery for CRC at the Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College between January 2017 and September 2022, were selected as the study population. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients with complete medical history; (2) Patients with no history of other neoplasms; (3) Patients with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of CRC. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Patients undergoing palliative resection or emergency surgery; (2) Patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy; (3) Patients with other malignancies. Consent for participation in the study was obtained from the patients themselves or their families, with all participants signing an informed consent form. The radical resections for CRC were performed by our specialist gastrointestinal surgery team. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and complied with the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data collection

The Jiahe Electronic Medical Record System, developed by Beijing Jiahe Meikang Information Technology Co., Ltd, was utilized to extract general preoperative patient data including age, sex, body mass index (BMI) (overweight defined as BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2), hemoglobin concentration (anemia defined as hemoglobin concentration below 120 g/L for men or 110 g/L for women), serum albumin (hypoproteinemia defined as plasma albumin concentration below 30 g/L), history of smoking and alcohol consumption, length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, serious postoperative complications, and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Serious postoperative complications were evaluated based on indicators such as hypoproteinemia, anastomotic leak, incisional infection, pulmonary infection, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, occurrence of cardiovascular accidents, and readmission to the hospital within 30 days after the operation. Surgical complications were categorized according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (21)—with grades I + II representing minor surgical complications and grades III + IV representing major surgical complications. Perioperative and subsequent complication data was reported for a period of 30 days postoperatively. In this study, the mFI-5 score, as described by Subramaniam et al. [15], was used by accessing the ACS-NSQIP database. The mFI-5 score was treated as a binary categorical variable [15, 18, 25], with an mFI-5 score ≥ 2 indicating frailty and an mFI-5 score < 2 representing the non-frailty group.

Group setting

A comparison was made between the frail and non-frail groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, serum albumin, hemoglobin, history of smoking and alcohol consumption, tumor location, maximum tumor meridian, as well as surgical data (operative time, intraoperative fluid replacement, intraoperative blood loss) and incidence of postoperative complications (hypoproteinemia, sepsis, pulmonary infections, cardiovascular accidents, lower limb venous thrombosis). Additionally, the mortality rates within 30 days after surgery were compared between groups.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 software. Continuous variables with normal distributions were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and t-tests were employed for comparison between groups. Continuous variables with skewed distributions were presented as [n (%)], including the number and percentage of cases, and the rank sum test was utilized for comparisons between groups. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages within the respective groups, and the X2 test was used for comparison between groups. Multivariate analyses were conducted with frailty as the independent variable and postoperative outcome indicators as the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were employed to adjust for relevant confounders. The predictive value of a mFI-5 score < 2 for postoperative complications was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). A significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Serious postoperative complications of patients

The study comprised a total of 208 patients, with 78 individuals experiencing severe postoperative complications, accounting for 38% (78 out of 208). The Clavien Dindo grading system was utilized to categorize the complications. Specifically, complications were classified as I, II, III, IV, and V, representing 22%, 18%, 3%, 7%, and 3% respectively (Table 1). Hypoalbuminemia exhibited the highest incidence rate of serious postoperative complications at 22%. Other complications included lung infection (14%), deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs (2%), postoperative wound infection (2%), anastomotic fistula (3%), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents (4%), sepsis (3%), and death occurring within 30 days after surgery (3%).

Table 1 Clavien-Dindo classification
Full size table

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients

Detailed demographic and clinical information for the 208 patients is presented in Table 2. No significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning preoperative parameters, including gender, BMI, overweight body mass, albumin levels, history of smoking and alcohol consumption, as well as weight loss. Moreover, there were no significant differences observed in surgical parameters such as tumor location, maximum tumor diameter, intraoperative fluid administration, intraoperative bleeding, and operative time (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Demographic data of patients in two groups
Full size table

Analysis of frailty and serious postoperative complications

Univariate analysis of frailty and postoperative complications

As shown in Table 3, patients with mFI-5 ≥ 2 exhibited a higher incidence of serious complications compared to those with mFI-5 < 2 (P = 0.001). Specifically, the incidence of complications such as pulmonary infections, sepsis and cardiovascular accidents was significantly higher in the frail group compared to the non-frail group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the frail group had a significantly higher incidence of death within 30 days after surgery compared to the non-frail group (P = 0.014). Conversely, no statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of anastomotic leak, postoperative incisional infection, hypoproteinemia, lower limb venous thrombosis, other complications, or return to the hospital within 30 days postoperatively (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Univariate analysis of frailty and severe postoperative complications
Full size table

Logistic regression analysis of frailty and serious postoperative complications

According to Table 4, the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days after surgery was greater in the frail group if not corrected. Even after accounting for gender and preoperative hemoglobin levels, the frail group continued to have a higher risk of postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days compared to the non-frail group. Frailty was an independent risk factor for postoperative pulmonary infections, sepsis, cardiovascular events, and mortality within 30 days after surgery.

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality
Full size table

Univariate and multivariate analysis of postoperative complication

The results presented in Table 5 demonstrate significant differences between the group experiencing postoperative complications and the group without such complications. These differences were observed in various factors, including the presence of overweight (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2), preoperative levels of albumin and hemoglobin, frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2), and the total length of hospital stay (p < 0.05). Through binary logistic multivariate analysis, it was determined that frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2), as well as decreased levels of preoperative serum albumin and hemoglobin, were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Among these factors, the mFI-5 exhibited the greatest predictive ability for severe postoperative complications (OR = 2.254, 95% CI 1.344—4.740, P = 0.004).

Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis of postoperative Complication
Full size table

Predictive power of the predictive value of mFI-5

As shown in Fig. 1, the area under the curve of the mFI-5 for the prediction of complications following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients was found to be 0.629 (95% CI: 0.551—0.707) (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for mFI-5 for the prediction of complications following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients

Full size image

Discussion

In this retrospective analysis of elderly patients undergoing radical CRC surgery, statistically significant differences were found in baseline data between frail and non-frail patients regarding age, preoperative hemoglobin levels, and other variables. Frail patients with an mFI-5 score of ≥ 2 had longer hospital stays compared to the non-frail group. They also experienced significantly higher rates of postoperative pulmonary infections, sepsis, cardiovascular accidents, and other complications, leading to mortality within 30 days after surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2), preoperative albumin levels, and prolonged hospitalization were independent risk factors for serious postoperative complications. These findings suggest that mFI-5 plays a crucial role in predicting such complications and short-term postoperative mortality. Similar to previous research on various subspecialties, mFI-5 ≥ 2 has consistently shown beneficial results in studies of radical CRC surgery in elderly patients [26, 27]. Studies in orthopedics, neurosurgery, and other fields have demonstrated that mFI-5 is an independent predictor of prognostic evaluations, including postoperative medical complications and outcomes. It has been shown to be consistent with the findings of the mFI-11 as an independent predictor of postoperative complications in various surgical specialties [12, 15, 16, 26, 27]. Therefore, this present study evaluating CRC surgery in older adults using mFI-5 aligns with previous studies assessing the benefits of CRC surgery in older adults using mFI-11 in large national databases [28].

The results of this study indicate that age of patients correlates with the prognosis of CRC treatment. However, it is important to note that not all elderly patients are frail. Shintaro et al. conducted a study showing that patients in their 90 s can safely undergo radical resection of CRC. Elderly patients who exhibit good preoperative performance can still achieve excellent short-term and long-term prognoses after surgery [29]. The mFI-5 offers rapid identification in clinical practice, allowing for early recognition and improvement of a patient's physiological reserve. This approach can lead to the best possible outcomes for patients with underlying diseases or low functional reserves. For high-risk patients, aggressive preoperative interventions such as exercise, respiratory adjustment training, or nutritional supplementation may enhance their physiological reserve and improve prognosis. A systematic review of 15 randomized trials comparing 457 pretreated patients with 450 controls undergoing major abdominal surgery showed that pretreated patients had lower rates of pulmonary morbidity and postoperative complications [30]. Several studies [31, 32] have demonstrated that preoperative exercise and nutritional therapy can improve frailty, facilitate postoperative recovery from gastrointestinal malignancies, and reduce hospital stays. Optimizing and intervening in the preoperative state benefits both patients and reduces the burden on the medical system. Anastomotic leakage after CRC surgery was found to prolong postoperative hospitalization by 26 days and increase total hospitalization costs by $10,970 compared to cases without leakage [33]. Manuel's study also revealed a correlation between prolonged postoperative hospital stay and postoperative severity [34]. In clinical diagnosis and treatment, particularly in perioperative management, frailty is associated with factors such as malnutrition and inadequate cardiopulmonary reserve, which can be modified. Therefore, incorporating mFI-5 into clinical decision-making helps identify and stratify older patients undergoing radical CRC surgery, enhances understanding of the additional risks associated with increased frailty, improves expectations of the recovery process, and optimizes patient prognosis.

However, this study had several limitations. It was a retrospective clinical study with a small sample size. Due to the lack of large epidemiological surveys and studies on elderly patients undergoing radical CRC in China, the results may not fully represent the overall situation of Chinese patients. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out studies with larger samples in future to further validate these findings. Additionally, data availability was limited to the first 30 days after the operation, which may have underestimated the incidence of complications. Thus, future studies should collect and analyze long-term follow-up data. Nonetheless, this study is the first to use an mFI-5 score of ≥ 2 as a cutoff value for radical CRC surgery in the elderly. This suggests that mFI-5 is promising for rapid preoperative clinical risk stratification.

Conclusions

MFI-5 was demonstrated to be a reliable predictor of complications and mortality occurring within 30 days after CRC surgery. By combining the preoperative mFI-5 with preoperative albumin levels, it is possible to more accurately identify patients at high risk, thus offering a valuable tool for assessing surgical risk, optimizing planning for elective surgeries, and effectively managing resources in elderly patients undergoing radical CRC surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials contributing to this article may be made available upon request by sending an e-mail to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

mFI:

Modified frailty index

CSHA-FI:

Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index

ACS-NSQIP:

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

CHF:

Congestive heart failure

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

BMI:

Body mass index

mFI-11:

11-Factor Modified Frailty Index

mFI-5:

5-Factor Modified Frailty Index

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L, et al. Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties. Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):544–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson TN, Wu DS, Stiegmann GV, et al. Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. Am J Surg. 2011;202(5):511–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Takenami T, Tsujinaka S, Miyakura Y, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(12):2686–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoogendijk EO, Theou O, Rockwood K, et al. Development and validation of a frailty index in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(5):927–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruiz JG, Priyadarshni S, Rahaman Z, et al. Validation of an automatically generated screening score for frailty: the care assessment need (CAN) score. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, et al. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183(1):104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Traven SA, Mcgurk KM, Reeves RA, et al. Modified frailty index predicts medical complications, length of stay, readmission, and mortality following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(10):1854–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

  10. Kim K-I, Park K-H, Koo K-H, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56(3):507–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, et al. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Subramaniam S, Aalberg J J, Soriano R P, et al. New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data. J Am Coll Surg 2018, 226(2).

  13. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(4):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chappidi MR, Kates M, Patel HD, et al. Frailty as a marker of adverse outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. 2016;34(6):256.e1-256.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal DN, Wilson JM, Staley C, et al. The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Is Predictive of 30-Day Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Kyphoplasty Vertebral Augmentation. World Neurosurgery. 2018;116:e225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Traven SA, Reeves RA, Slone HS, et al. Frailty Predicts Medical Complications, Length of Stay, Readmission, and Mortality in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7):1412–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah NV, Kim DJ, Patel N, et al. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) is predictive of 30-day postoperative complications and readmission in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). J Clin Neurosci. 2022;104:69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson JM, Holzgrefe RE, Staley CA, et al. Use of a 5-Item Modified Frailty Index for Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Surgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures. J Hand Surg. 2018;43(8):701–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vermillion SA, Hsu FC, Dorrell RD, et al. Modified frailty index predicts postoperative outcomes in older gastrointestinal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(8):997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tweed T T T, Sier M a T, Van Bodegraven A A, et al. Feasibility and Efficiency of the BEFORE (Better Exercise and Food, Better Recovery) Prehabilitation Program. Nutrients, 2021, 13(10).

  21. Schaller SJ, Kiselev J, Loidl V, et al. Prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO): study protocol for a randomized, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Okabe H, Ohsaki T, Ogawa K, et al. Frailty predicts severe postoperative complications after elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2019;217(4):677–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eamer GJ, Clement F, Holroyd-Leduc J, et al. Frailty predicts increased costs in emergent general surgery patients: A prospective cohort cost analysis. Surgery. 2019;166(1):82–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Araújo-Andrade L, Rocha-Neves JP, Duarte-Gamas L, et al. Prognostic effect of the new 5-factor modified frailty index in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia - A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;80:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rockwood K, Song X, Macknight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, et al. The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in the Geriatric Surgical Population. Am Surg. 2021;87(9):1420–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin JI, Keswani A, Lovy AJ, et al. Simplified Frailty Index as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(11):2389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashimoto S, Hamada K, Sumida Y, et al. Short-and long-term survival after curative resection for colorectal cancer in nonagenarian patients. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(1):208–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vermillion S A, Hsu F-C, Dorrell R D, et al. Modified frailty index predicts postoperative outcomes in older gastrointestinal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2017, 115(8).

  31. Hughes MJ, Hackney RJ, Lamb PJ, et al. Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Oba MS, et al. Matched pair analysis to examine the effects of a planned preoperative exercise program in early gastric cancer patients with metabolic syndrome to reduce operative risk: the Adjuvant Exercise for General Elective Surgery (AEGES) study group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(6):2044–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mukai T, Maki A, Shimizu H, et al. The economic burdens of anastomotic leakage for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in Japan. Asian J Surg, 2023 Jul, Epub ahead of print.

  34. Buitrago-Ruiz M, Martinez-Nicolas I, Soria-Aledo V. Validation of prolonged length of stay as a reliable measure of failure to rescue in colorectal surgery. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(1):126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Guangdong Municipal Department of Science and Technology, Municipal Schools (Institutes) Jointly Funded Project, China (NO.2023A03J0386); Guangzhou Medical University, First-class Professional Construction Project in 2022-Enhancement of Undergraduates' Scientific Research and Innovation Ability Project (NO.02 -408–2203-2059).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lihong Huang and Zhifa Li contributed equally to the manuscript and should be considered as co-first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastrointestinal Surgery; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Lihong Huang, Zhifa Li, Mengru Jian, Xiaobing Wu & Rong Chen

  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Third Clinical School of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Province, 510150, China

    Huixian Chen, Haifeng Qin, Ziqiao Li & Shixi Song

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Yingjun Xie

Authors
  1. Lihong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhifa Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mengru Jian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaobing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huixian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haifeng Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ziqiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shixi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yingjun Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript: Lihong Huang, Zhifa Li, and Mengru Jian. Conducted the study and managed the database:Huixian Chen, Haifeng Qin, Ziqiao Li, and Shixi Song. Design and drafted the manuscript: Zhifa Li and Xiaobing Wu. Manuscript review: Yingjun Xie and Rong Chen. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yingjun Xie or Rong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Medical ethics review [2023] No.013.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, L., Li, Z., Jian, M. et al. Application of MFI-5 in severe complications and unfavorable outcomes after radical resection of colorectal cancer. World J Surg Onc 21, 307 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03186-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03186-4

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us