Skip to main content
Download PDF

Protection of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves by different surgical procedures in comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy for locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a multicenter experience

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 21, Article number: 30 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

According to the different characteristics of patients and cervical lymph node metastasis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer, the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves were treated by different surgical procedures, and the safety and protective effects of different surgical procedures were investigated.

Methods

One hundred ninety-seven patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected. According to the different characteristics of patients and cervical metastatic lymph nodes, three different surgical procedures were used to treat the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve: finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps, finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves at the intersections of the distal ends of facial arteries and veins with the mandible, and not exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves. The anatomical position, injury, and complications of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were observed.

Results

The marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were found and exposed at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps in 102 patients; the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves were found and exposed at the intersections of the distal ends of the facial arteries and veins with the mandibles in 64 patients; the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves were not exposed in 31 patients; among them, four patients had permanent injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, and temporary injury occurred in seven patients. There were statistically significant differences in the protection of the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve among the three different surgical methods (P = 0.0184). The best protective effect was to find and expose the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle of the platysma muscle flap, and the injury rate was only 2.94%.

Conclusion

The three different surgical procedures were all safe and effective in treating the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, the best protective effect was to find and expose the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle of the platysma muscle flap.

Introduction

Comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy includes all the lymphoid and adipose tissues that can be dissected in classical radical cervical lymphadenectomy, and whether the internal jugular veins, sternocleidomastoid muscles, and accessory nerves are preserved does not affect whether it is classified as comprehensive [1]. Radical resection or radical resection plus repair and reconstruction with comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy is the main method for comprehensive treatment of locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer, although there is evidence that the submandibular glands can be spared in cervical lymphadenectomy for early-stage oral and oropharyngeal cancer [2,3,4,5]. However, removal of the submandibular glands is inevitable in cervical lymphadenectomy for locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer [6,7,8].

Surgeries involving the facial nerves have a high risk of iatrogenic injuries. The marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves are extremely special in nature. Once an injury occurs, the complications will be devastating and functions will be lost, which will involve the patient’s facial aesthetics [9,10,11], causing great psychological trauma to the patient, and thus affecting tumor treatment [12, 13]. Whether it is necessary to dissect the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves when removing the submandibular glands during comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy and whether the dissection can protect the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves are a subject worthy of clinical research. In this study, according to the different characteristics of patients and cervical lymph node metastasis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer, different surgical procedures were used to treat the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, and the safety and protective effects of different surgical procedures were investigated, so as to further summarize the clinical experience, reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury to the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, and maintain the aesthetics and functions of patients’ faces to the maximum extent.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Ethical Committee of the Longgang E.N.T Hospital approved clinical samples for research purposes (NO. 2022–0001), and this study conformed to the principles contained in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was requested as anonymous specimens and was given by all human participants in this study.

Case inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria include ① age > 18 years; ② definitive pathological diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer requiring cervical lymphadenectomy with submandibular gland resection according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines or the results of multidisciplinary care discussion; ③ no significant invasion of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves before operation; ④ no serious cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, etc.; ⑤Karnofsky score ≥ 80 points; ⑥ an estimated survival of more than one year; ⑦ and patients who voluntarily participated and signed the informed consent form.

The exclusion criteria include ① cervical lymphadenectomy for oral and oropharyngeal cancer without the need for submandibular gland resection, ② significant invasion of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves before operation, ③ significant submandibular lesions, ④ a history of surgery or radiotherapy of the neck, ⑤ distant metastasis, and ⑥ unable to tolerate the surgery due to severe comorbidities.

Clinical data

From January 2014 to June 2021, 197 patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer, including 131 males and 66 females, aged 29 to 68 years, and with a median age of 54.6 years, were selected from the Head and Neck Department of Shenzhen Otolaryngology Research Institute/Shenzhen Longgang Otolaryngology Hospital, Head and Neck Department of Gannan Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the First Hospital of Qiqihar in Heilongjiang Province, and Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University. There were 78 cases of tongue cancer, 35 cases of gingival cancer, 32 cases of buccal cancer, 28 cases of oral floor cancer, 24 cases of lingual root or oropharyngeal cancer, 16 cases at stage III, 114 cases at stage IVA, and 67 cases at stage IVB (Table 1). All patients underwent radical tumor resection or radical tumor resection plus flap repair and reconstruction with cervical lymphadenectomy and submandibular gland resection. The marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were treated and submandibular glands were removed during the operation (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).

Table 1 General clinical data of the patients (n = 197)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Incision of the buccal mucosa cancer invading the skin

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy with dissection of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves plus extended radical resection of the right buccal cancer

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

En bloc resection specimen

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Repair of penetrating buccal defect with a pectoralis major flap folded in half

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Re-examination at 3 years after surgery showed that the patient had a good appearance and the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were functioning normally

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Appearance of the intraoral flap repair 3 years after surgery

Full size image

Evaluation criteria for facial nerve function

The facial nerve function was evaluated using the Sunnybrook [14] facial nerve evaluation system. According to this scoring criteria, the higher the score, the better the facial nerve function. The facial nerve function is normal if the scores before and after surgery are the same, and the score after surgery being lower than that before surgery indicates facial nerve dysfunction. In this study, the function of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves was mainly evaluated.

Surgical approaches

All operations were performed by doctors with the title of an associate chief physician or above and with several years of surgical experience. The most suitable surgical incision was selected according to the characteristics of oral and oropharyngeal cancer and the results of the multidisciplinary care discussion. According to the different characteristics of patients and cervical metastatic lymph nodes, three different surgical procedures were used to treat the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves: finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps, finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the intersections of the distal ends of facial arteries and veins with the mandible, and not exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves.

Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps: At the junction of about 1 cm superior to the mandibular angle and 1 cm anterior to the ascending branch of the mandible, an electric scalpel was used to make an incision along the horizontal plane of the mandible, and then, the adipose tissues were carefully cut open, the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerves were located up and down, and the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve was separated during the whole process. Then, the distal ends of the facial artery and vein were separated and disconnected along the surface of the submandibular gland, and the submandibular gland and the lymphoid adipose in region Ib were separated and resected (Fig. 7). Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the intersections of the distal ends of the facial arteries and veins with the mandible: After the platysma flap was overturned, the distal ends of the facial artery and vein were found, and careful separation was conducted. The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve was found on the superficial surface of the facial artery and vein. The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve was dissected throughout by a two-way separation. The distal ends of the facial artery and vein were disconnected. The submandibular gland as well as the lymphoid and adipose tissues in region Ib were separated and excised (Fig. 8). Not exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, the superficial layer of the deep cervical fascia was used as the anatomical plane, and the surrounding tissues were carefully separated along the gland surface. During the process, the gland was slightly pulled down with devices to maintain a safe distance from the marginal mandibular branch and the submandibular gland body; moreover, the distal ends of the facial artery and vein were exposed, the facial artery and vein were disconnected close to the surface of the submandibular gland, blunt dissection was conducted along the circumference of the submandibular gland, and the lymphoid and adipose tissues in region Ib were separated and excised.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Searching for the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Searching for the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve at the distal ends of the facial artery and vein

Full size image

Postoperative observation items

The anatomical position and state of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, as well as the function of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves after surgery, were observed. After the operation, the function of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve was investigated for 7 times until 1 year after the end of radiotherapy, namely, after surgery, before radiotherapy, after radiotherapy, 1 month after radiotherapy, 3 months after radiotherapy, 6 months after radiotherapy, and 12 months after radiotherapy.

Statistical methods

The anatomical state and injury, as well as the occurrence and recovery of complications of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves under the three different surgical procedures, were statistically analyzed. Chi-square test was conducted using SPSS 20.0, and the difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Selection of surgical procedures to protect the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves

Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps was suitable for those with larger and more lymph nodes in region Ib. Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the intersections of the distal ends of facial arteries and veins with the mandible was suitable for those with larger and more lymph nodes in region IIa. Not exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves was suitable for those without obvious lymph nodes in region Ib or region IIa.

The anatomical position of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves

The marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves penetrated from the front or lower ends of the parotid glands. They were constantly located between the deep surface of the platysma and the superficial layer of the deep fascia cervicalis and on the plane of the lower mandible. They crossed the superficial surface of the posterior facial veins, mandibular angles, and anterior facial veins from back to front, and entered the deep surface of deltoid muscles at the distal ends of facial arteries and veins.

Different surgical procedures to deal with the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves

Among the 197 oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy with excision of the submandibular glands, the two methods for finding the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves both successfully found the marginal mandibular branches (Table 2).

Table 2 Different surgical procedures to deal with the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves (n = 197)
Full size table

Injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve

Among the 197 patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer, four patients (4/197, 2.03%) had permanent injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves. Among them, one patient (1/102, 0.98%) had an injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves in whom the nerve was found and exposed at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps; one patient (1/64, 1.56%) had an injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves in whom the nerve was found and exposed at the intersections of the distal ends of the facial arteries and veins with the mandible; and two patients (2/31, 6.45%) had an injury to the nerve in whom the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were not exposed.

The temporary injury occurred in seven patients (7/197, 3.55%). Among them, two patients (2/102, 1.96%) had an injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves in whom the nerve was found and exposed at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps; two patients (2/64, 3.13%) had an injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves in whom the nerve was found and exposed at the intersections of the distal ends of the facial arteries and veins with the mandible; and three patients (3/31, 9.68%) had an injury to the nerve in whom the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were not exposed.

There were statistically significant differences in the protection of the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve among the three different surgical methods (χ2 = 7.9875, P = 0.0184). The best protective effect was to find and expose the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle of the platysma muscle flap, and the injury rate was only 2.94% (Table 3). The patients were followed up for 6–90 months after surgery, and the functions were restored in all patients with temporary injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves.

Table 3 Injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve (n = 197)
Full size table

Discussion

With the development and progress of society, in the treatment of patients with locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer, not only the survival rate but also the quality of life should be improved. The injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves can cause dysfunctions, with a serious physiological and psychological impact on patients. Cervical lymph node metastasis is a characteristic of locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer and an important factor for prognosis. Adequate assessment and lymphadenectomy are extremely important for improving the survival rate and quality of life in locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer [15, 16].

Lymphadenectomy is the gold standard for surgical treatment of cervical lymph node metastasis. With the development of functional surgery, radical cervical lymphadenectomy characterized by the resection of internal jugular veins, sternocleidomastoid muscles, and accessory nerves has been used decreasingly [17, 18]. Under the concept of maximum dissection of cervical lymphoid and adipose tissues and maximum preservation of normal tissues, whether the internal jugular veins, sternocleidomastoid muscles, accessory nerves, and other tissue structures are spared does not affect the thoroughness of cervical lymphadenectomy, and selective lymphadenectomy and comprehensive lymphadenectomy are more in line with the concept of functional surgery [1]. Under the guidance of the concept of functional surgery, the preservation of submandibular glands in cervical lymphadenectomy has received increasing attention. There is enough evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to preserve the submandibular glands in cervical lymphadenectomy for early-stage oral and oropharyngeal cancer; however, it is still necessary to remove the submandibular glands in cervical lymphadenectomy for locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer [19,20,21], and the removal of submandibular glands are closely related to marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves [22].

The anatomy of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves is complicated. The facial nerves run forward and downward from the stylomastoid foramina, pass through the posteromedial surface of parotid glands, and enter the parotid glands. The marginal mandibular branches are sent out from the cervical-facial trunks, pass through the front or lower end of parotid glands, pass through the mandibular angles, and are constantly located between the deep surface of platysma and the superficial layer of deep fascia cervicalis, and on the plane of the lower mandible. They cross the superficial surface of the posterior facial veins, mandibular angles, and anterior facial veins from back to front and enter the deep surface of the deltoid muscles at the distal ends of facial arteries and veins [23,24,25]. A marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve is a fine nerve, which usually has 1–3 branches. After its injury, it leads to paralysis of the lower lip, bilateral facial asymmetry, significantly skewed mouth angle, salivation, and even impact on eating, which seriously affects the appearance and functions of patients, reduces the quality of life, and causes great psychological trauma to patients [9, 26]. How to protect the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves when resecting the submandibular glands in comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer, whether to dissect them and how to dissect, is worth pondering.

In our multicenter retrospective study, according to the different characteristics of patients and cervical metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the proficiency of surgeons, we adopted three different surgical procedures to deal with the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves. For patients with larger and more lymph nodes in region Ib, the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were found and exposed at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps. For patients with larger and more lymph nodes in region IIa, the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves were found and exposed at the intersections of the distal ends of facial arteries and veins with the mandible. After finding the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves in these two ways, the facial nerves were completely separated under direct vision, the proximal and distal ends of facial arteries and veins were disconnected, the submandibular glands were resected, and the lymphoid and adipose tissues in region Ib were cleaned. The dissection of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves according to different characteristics of lymph nodes can avoid the inflammation and tissue adhesion caused by lymph nodes and protect the marginal mandibular branches of facial nerves to the greatest extent. For patients without obvious lymph nodes in region Ib or region IIa, the submandibular glands were removed, and the lymphoid and adipose tissues in region Ib were cleaned without exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, When cleaning the perivascular lymph nodes at the distal end of the facial artery and vein and ligating blood vessels to remove the submandibular gland, special attention should be paid to the position of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve to avoid injury. However, there were statistically significant differences in the protection of the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve among three different surgical methods (P = 0.0184), suggesting that the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve should be dissected as far as possible in the comprehensive neck lymph node dissection for locally advanced oral oropharyngeal carcinoma. The best protection effect was to find and expose the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle of the platysma muscle flap, and the injury rate was only 2.94%.

Among the 197 patients with locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer, the incidence of permanent injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves was 2.03% and that of temporary injury was 3.55%. The extremely low incidence of injury of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves verified our correct choices. We should conduct a sufficient evaluation before the operation, formulate a strict surgical plan, and flexibly choose the measures to protect the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves according to the specific situation of the primary lesion and lymph nodes as well as the surgeon’s proficiency. When the marginal mandibular branches of the sectional nerves are not dissected, the glands should be pulled down slightly with instruments to keep a safe distance from the marginal mandibular branches for resection. When dissecting the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves, we should pay attention to its branches [24, 25]. With thorough hemostasis, the nerves can be clearly and completely exposed during dissection. Electrocoagulation and clamping are prohibited in the peripheral areas of the nerves. The epineuria of the nerves should be protected, and exposure of the nerves should be avoided. Various risk factors that can cause injury to the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves should be minimized, thereby achieving the goal of maximum protection of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves.

Conclusion

The best protective effect was to find and expose the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve at the mandibular angle of the platysma muscle flap. Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the mandibular angles of the platysma flaps was suitable for those with larger and more lymph nodes in region Ib. Finding and exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves at the intersections of the distal ends of facial arteries and veins with the mandible was suitable for those with larger and more lymph nodes in region IIa. Not exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves was suitable for those without obvious lymph nodes in region Ib or region IIa.

In the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer, individualized and precise treatment is required, and every detail in the treatment should be finely managed. Protecting the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves from injury will play an increasingly important role in the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Intraoperatively, we should choose an appropriate method in exposing the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves according to the different characteristics of patients and cervical metastatic lymph nodes as well as the proficiency of surgeons.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets are available on request from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The raw data and all related documents supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

References

  1. Robbins K Thomas, Shaha Ashok R, Medina Jesus E, Califano Joseph A, Wolf Gregory T, Ferlito Alfio, Som Peter M, Day Terry A. Committee for Neck Dissection Classification, American Head and Neck Society. Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(5):536–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang X, Liu F, Lan X, Luo K, Li S. Combined submandibular gland flap and sternocleidomastoid musculocutaneous flap for postoperative reconstruction in older aged patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bo Gu, Fang Q, Yao Wu, Wei Du, Zhang Xu, Chen D. Impact of submandibular gland preservation in neck management of early-stage buccal squamous cell carcinoma on locoregional control and disease-specific survival. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Javadi S, Khademi B, Mohamadianpanah M, Shishegar M, Babaei A. Elective submandibular gland resection in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;33(114):23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wei Du, Fang Q, Liu S, Chen D, Ruihua Luo Xu, Zhang. Feasibility of submandibular gland preservation in cT1-2N0 squamous cell carcinoma in the floor of the mouth. Front Oncol. 2020;10:579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakhetiy A, Kaul P, Pandey A, Patel T, Kumar Meena J, Pal Singh M, et al. Distribution and determinants of submandibular gland involvement in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2021;118:105316.

  7. Zhang X, Liu F, Lan X, Yu L, Wu W, Wu X, et al. Clinical observation of submandibular gland transfer for the prevention of xerostomia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study of 32 cases. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou P, Chen J-X, Zhou Y, Lian C-L, Yan B, San-Gang Wu. Rare metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:728230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Volk Gerd Fabian, Olsen Kerry D, Mäkitie Antti A, Silver Carl E, Zafereo Mark E, Rinaldo Alessandra, Randolph Gregory W, Simo Ricard, Shaha Ashok R, Poorten Vincent Vander, Ferlito Alfio. Facial nerve electrodiagnostics for patients with facial palsy: a clinical practice guideline. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.  2020; 277(7):1855–74.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriguez-Lorenzo Andres, Jensson David, Weninger Wolfgang J, Schmid Melanie, Meng Stefan, Tzou Chieh-Han John. Platysma motor nerve transfer for restoring marginal mandibular nerve function. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(12):e1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elkatatny Amr Abdelmonam Abdelaziz M, Abdallah Hany Abdelrahim Abdelrazik, Ghoraba Dina, Amer Tarek Ahmed, Hamdy Tarek. Hypoglossal facial nerve anastomosis for post-operative and post-traumatic complete facial nerve paralysis. Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(23):3984–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Currie CL, Copeland JL, Voss ML, Swanepoel LM, Ambeskovic M, Patel NB, et al. Trauma-informed interventions versus control for cancer-risk behaviours among adults: rationale and design for a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cozzolino Mauro, Cocco Stefania, Piezzo Michela, Celia Giovanna, Costantini Susan, Abate Valentina, Capone Francesca, Barberio Daniela, Girelli Laura, Cavicchiolo Elisa, Ascierto Paolo Antonio, Madonna Gabriele, Budillon Alfredo, Laurentiis Michelino De. A psychosocial genomics pilot study in oncology for verifying clinical, inflammatory and psychological effects of mind-body transformations-therapy (MBT-T) in breast cancer patients: preliminary results. J Clin Med. 2021;10(1):136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jirawatnotai Supasid, Jomkoh Pojanan, Voravitvet Tsz Yin, Tirakotai Wuttipong, Somboonsap Natthawut. Computerized Sunnybrook facial grading scale (SBface) application for facial paralysis evaluation. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(3):269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoda Nadimul, BC Rajani, Ghosh Subhabrata, KS Sabitha, B Vasantha Dhara, Nathani Jayesh. Cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: a retrospective study on pattern of involvement and clinical analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021;26(1):e84–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding D, Stokes W, Eguchi M, Hararah M, Sumner W, Amini A, Goddard J, Somerset H, Bradley C, McDermott J, Raben D, Karam SD. Association between lymph node ratio and recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(1):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coskun HH, Medina JE, Robbins KT, Silver CE, Strojan P, Teymoortash A, et al. Current philosophy in the surgical management of neck metastases for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015;37(6):915–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teymoortash A, Werner JA. Current advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;11:Doc04.

  19. Amjad S, Borle RM, Khatib MN, Bhola N. Implications of oral squamous cell carcinoma to submandibular gland: a systematic analysis. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33:144–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeng W, Qiu CY, Liu JF, Pan Y, Li R, Luo K, et al. The preservation and application of the submandibular gland in oral squamous cell carcinoma (STROBE). Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(52):e18520.

  21. Koyfman Shlomo A, Ismaila Nofisat, Crook Doug, D’Cruz Anil, Rodriguez Cristina P, Sher David J, Silbermins Damian, Sturgis Erich M, Tsue Terance T, Weiss Jared, Yom Sue S, Holsinger F Christopher. Management of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(20):1753–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Qahtani K, Mlynarek A, Adamis J, Harris J, Seikaly H, Islam T. Intraoperative localization of the marginal mandibular nerve: a landmark study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anthony DJ, Oshan Deshanjana Basnayake BM, Mathangasinghe Y, Malalasekera AP. Preserving the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve during submandibular region surgery: a cadaveric safety study. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tereshenko V, Dotzauer DC, Maierhofer U, Festin C, Luft M, Laengle G, Politikou O, Klein HJ, Blumer R, Aszmann OC, Bergmeister KD. Selective denervation of the facial dermato-muscular complex in the rat: experimental model and anatomical basis. Front Neuroanat. 2021;15:650761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Strantzias P, Botou A, Manoli A, Skandalakis PN, Filippou D. Variation of marginal mandibular nerve in a Caucasian male cadaver: a study using the anatomage table. Cureus. 2019;11(11):e6168.

  26. Rodriguez Colon R, Park JJ, Boczar D, Diep GK, Berman ZP, Trilles J, et al. Evaluating functional outcomes in reanimation surgery for chronic facial paralysis: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(3):e3492.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (No. SZXK039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Longgang E.N.T Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of E.N.T, Institute of E.N.T Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, No.3004, Longgang Avenue, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

    Jiuzhou Zhao, Ke Li & Xiangmin Zhang

  2. Department of Head and Neck, Tumor Hospital of Ganzhou, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

    Wen Zeng

  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, First Hospital of Qiqihaer City, Heilongjiang Province, Qiqihaer, People’s Republic of China

    Chengyu Qiu

  4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

    Jiafeng Liu

  5. Department of Institute of Cancer Research, Tumor Hospital of Ganzhou, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

    Jing Huang

  6. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China

    Michael C. F. Tong

Authors
  1. Jiuzhou Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chengyu Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiafeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ke Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael C. F. Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiangmin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZ completed most of the experiments, and WZ, CQ, JL, CFT and KL assisted in completing the experiments. WZ, CQ, JL, JH and KL completed data collection and statistics. XZ designed and supervised the completion of this experiment and wrote this article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangmin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Ethical Committee of the Longgang E.N.T Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of E.N.T & Institute of E.N.T Shenzhen Review Board approved the study protocol (2022–0001), and written informed consent was obtained from participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Zeng, W., Qiu, C. et al. Protection of the marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerves by different surgical procedures in comprehensive cervical lymphadenectomy for locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a multicenter experience. World J Surg Onc 21, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02913-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02913-1

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us