Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pathological multifocality is not a prognosis factor of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a single-center, retrospective study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 20, Article number: 394 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Non-total thyroidectomy (non-TTx) is a widely accepted operative procedure for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). PTC patients preoperatively diagnosed with unifocal disease are often revealed as having multifocal foci by microscopy. The present study determined whether or not patients with clinically unifocal, but pathologically multifocal non-high-risk PTC treated with non-TTx have an increased risk of a poor prognosis compared to those with pathologically unifocal PTC.

Materials and methods

PTC patients diagnosed as unifocal preoperatively who underwent non-TTx were multifocal in 61 and unifocal in 266 patients microscopically. Oncologic event rates were compared between pathologically multifocal and unifocal PTC patients.

Results

Pathological multifocality was associated with positive clinical lymph node metastasis (cN1) (odds ratio [OR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–8.04) and positive pathological lymph node metastasis (pN1) in > 5 nodes (OR 3.68, 95% CI: 1.60–8.49). No patients died from PTC. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate, remnant thyroid disease-free survival rate, lymph node disease-free survival rate, or distant disease-free survival rate between the two groups. Recurrence in pathologically multifocal PTC patients was locoregional in all cases and able to be salvaged by reoperation. Cox proportional hazard model analyses showed no significant difference in recurrence rates with regard to pathological multifocality and cN or number of pNs.

Conclusion

The prognosis of PTC with pathological multifocality treated by non-TTx was not inferior to that of unifocal PTC. Immediate completion thyroidectomy is not necessary when microscopic foci are proven.

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, and its incidence has been increasing worldwide [1]. Management of PTC has evolved as reflected in professional societies’ clinical practice guidelines [2,3,4,5]. The latest Japanese guidelines set four risk categories predictive of recurrence or cancer death as an initial assessment of PTC based on the preoperative findings according to the TNM classification: very low-risk PTC measuring ≤ 1 cm without any metastases (T1aN0M0); low-risk PTC measuring 1.1–2 cm without any metastases (T1bN0M0); high-risk PTC having at least 1 of several features including tumor size > 4 cm, extrathyroidal extension, or extranodal extension to adjacent structures except for the sternothyroid muscle, clinical node metastasis > 3 cm, and M1; and intermediate-risk PTC, referring to a tumor that does not meet any of the definitions for very low-, low-, or high-risk categories [5].

Aside from active surveillance for very low-risk PTC, hemithyroidectomy (lobectomy or lobectomy plus isthmectomy) along with prophylactic central node dissection is a treatment of choice for the very low-risk, the low-risk, and even some intermediate-risk PTCs [5]. Those surgical procedures have the advantages of avoiding postoperative thyroid hormone replacement and hypoparathyroidism; however, the incidental microscopic multifocality of the disease poses a dilemma. Indeed, multifocal PTC accounts for 18–87% of PTCs [6].

In cases of clinically unifocal PTC treated with non-total thyroidectomy (non-TTx), incidental microscopic PTC is often recognized. In such cases, PTC not detected clinically might be left in the remaining thyroid tissue. Multifocality in the ipsilateral lobe is a risk factor of cancer presence in the opposite lobe that the rate accounts for 16.7–58% [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The European Society of Endocrine Surgeons recommends total or near-total thyroidectomy for apparent multifocal PTC as the initial treatment to reduce local recurrence risk [6]. It also states that completion thyroidectomy may be necessary when the diagnosis of multifocal PTC is made following non-TTx [6]. While the probability of microscopic residual cancer may be high in multifocal PTC treated with non-TTx, the need to add completion surgery remains controversial [6,7,8, 17].

In the previous reports, the multifocality of cases was not clearly described. How microscopic multifocality influences the outcomes of PTC patients thus remains unclear. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a retrospective survey with a study population of patients with pathologically multifocal PTC and those with pathologically proven unifocal PTC treated by non-TTx. The research questions of this study are as follows: is there a difference in oncologic event rates between pathologically multifocal and unifocal PTC treated by non-TTx? What is the likelihood of developing recurrence in patients with pathologically multifocal PTC relative to those with unifocal PTC after controlling for potential confounders?

Patients and methods

Study population

Six-hundred and seventy patients underwent an initial operation for PTC without distant metastasis at Tokyo Women’s Medical University from 2010 to 2017. Clinically, PTC was unifocal in 512 (76.4%) patients. Patients with gross extrathyroidal extension and/or with tumors > 4 cm in size, who underwent total thyroidectomy (TTx) or near TTx, non-TTx followed by completion thyroidectomy (CTx) within 6 months, or who underwent partial thyroidectomy, were excluded. Ultimately, 327 patients who underwent non-TTX, including 320 hemithyroidectomy and 7 subtotal thyroidectomy patients, were enrolled. Serial 5-mm sections of whole specimen were prepared for pathological examination. Pathologically multifocal PTC was found in 61 (18.7%) of the non-TTx patients (Fig. 1). The study included 327 non-high-risk patients who underwent non-TTx for clinically unifocal PTC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight edition of AJCC TNM classification for papillary thyroid carcinoma is described in italic

Full size image

Observations

We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of each patient to collect data on the following: sex, age at surgery, preoperative and postoperative 8th edition UICC TNM classification, use of levothyroxine replacement, and vital status. Preoperative TNM classification was evaluated by neck ultrasonography and/or computed tomography (CT). Patients were followed every 6 to 12 months by both physical examinations and thyroid function tests including serum thyroglobulin evaluations, in conjunction with neck ultrasonography. CT scans were regularly performed on patients with high-risk features, and they were also carried out as needed for those with either apparent or suspected disease recurrence. The oncologic events that account for the study outcomes were the recurrence of PTC (primary) and cancer death (secondary).

Statistical analyses

Student’s t-test and χ2 test were used to compare variables between groups. The disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for the univariable analysis. The hazard ratio was calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP R Pro software program, 14.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University (reference number 4842), and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Results

Clinicopathologic features (Table 1)

Sex distribution and age were not significantly different between the pathologically multifocal and unifocal PTC groups. Distribution of pathological subtype according to 4th edition of WHO classification [18] did not differ between multifocal and unifocal PTC groups (Table 2). Pathological multifocality was associated with clinically positive lymph node metastasis (cN1) (odds ratio [OR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–8.04) and positive pathological lymph node metastasis (pN1) in > 5 nodes (OR 3.68, 95% CI: 1.60–8.49). All cN1 patients were pN1. Postoperative levothyroxine replacement was necessary in 7 (11.5%) pathologically multifocal PTC patients and 74 (27.8%) pathologically unifocal PTC patients. In total, 246 patients (75.2%) maintained their thyroid function without levothyroxine.

Table 1 Clinicopathologic features of patients with pathologically multifocal or unifocal PTC
Full size table
Table 2 Pathological subtype of papillary carcinoma
Full size table

Postoperative events and the survival

Median follow-up period was 5.32 years (range: 0.01–11.38). None of the patients died from PTC (Table 3). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, remnant thyroid DFS (RDFS), lymph node DFS (LDFS), and distant DFS (DDFS) of pathologically multifocal PTC was 90.9% (95% CI: 82.2–99.6), 97.1% (95% CI: 91.6–100), 94.0% (95% CI: 87.3–100), and 100%, respectively (Fig. 2 A–D). The 5-year DFS, RDFS, LDFS, and DDFS of pathologically unifocal PTC were 96.7% (95% CI: 94.3–99.1), 99.5% (95% CI: 98.6–100), 97.1% (95% CI: 94.7–99.4), and 99.0% (95% CI: 98.5–100), respectively (Fig. 2 A–D). While the DFS of pathologically multifocal PTC was lower than that of pathologically unifocal PTC, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.15) (Fig. 2 A). Four patients (6.6%) with pathologically multifocal PTC developed recurrence, 2 in the cervical lymph node, 1 in the mediastinal lymph node, and 1 in the residual thyroid tissue (Table 3). Nine patients (3.4%) with unifocal PTC developed recurrence, 6 in the cervical lymph node only, 1 in the cervical lymph node and lung, and 2 in the residual thyroid tissue (Table 3). Contralateral lobe was resected in 6 patients. PTC in the residual thyroid tissue was detected in 4 (67%) patients. Complication associated with CTx was permanent hypoparathyroidism in one patient and transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in another patient. Cox proportional hazard model analyses showed no significant difference in the hazard ratios of PTC recurrence with regard to pathological multifocality and cN or the number of pNs (Table 4).

Table 3 Postoperative events
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparing unifocal and multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves showing disease-free survival (A), remnant thyroid disease-free survival (B), lymph node disease-free survival (C), distant disease-free survival (D)

Full size image
Table 4 Results of Cox proportional hazard model analyses
Full size table

Discussion

Non-TTx has been the favored operative procedure for PTC including node-positive cases in Japan than in other countries especially before adjuvant radioiodine therapy became available in 2010. In addition to the merits of non-TTx, the shortage of institutions that perform radioiodine therapy and the Japanese historical background of disliking for radiation-using modalities have boosted this tendency. Previous findings that the survival of PTC patients is not markedly affected by the extent of surgery has become the basis of allowing non-TTx for non-high-risk PTC cases [19,20,21,22,23,24].

Performing non-TTx without CTx for multifocal PTC remains controversial [6,7,8, 17, 25]. In the guideline of the American Thyroid Association published in 2015, CTx is recommended for multifocal PTC treated with non-TTx to achieve complete resection of multifocal disease and to allow for efficient RAI therapy [3]. Pathologically multifocal PTC in the unilateral lobe increases the possibility of clinically undetected PTC in the remnant thyroid [7, 8, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Some studies have reported that lymph node metastasis is more often observed in multifocal PTC than in unifocal PTC, although none of them distinguished cN and pN [26,27,28,29,30,31].

In the present study, multifocality was associated with cN and > 5 lymph nodes involved pN1. cN was adopted as a factor separately from pN as it indicates large-volume, macroscopic clinically apparent metastasis. This implies that multifocality is related to the massive lymphatic flow of cancer cells. Multifocality is reported to be a risk factor of cancer recurrence [26,27,28,29, 32,33,34,35]. In contrast, some reports described no marked difference in recurrence [17, 30, 36] or the survival based on multifocality [17, 30, 34, 37].

All the previous studies discussed about clinical multifocality. One unique point of our present study is that the target was multifocality that was recognized only microscopically. In our study, the DFS, RDFS, LDFS, and DDFS of pathologically multifocal PTC were not statistically inferior to those that of pathologically unifocal PTC. Cox proportional hazard model analyses revealed that pathological multifocality was not a risk factor for recurrence. Because of the retrospective nature of the present study, some factors may have affected the association between the multifocality of PTC and disease recurrence. Multivariable analyses, however, indicated that the hazard ratios of pathological multifocality were statistically insignificant. The lymph node was the most frequent site of recurrence. Higher rate of cN1 and higher number of pN1 might affect the higher rate of lymph node recurrence in pathologically multifocal PTC. Indeed, cN1 and > 5 lymph nodes involved pN1 are both reported to be risk factors of locoregional lymph node metastasis [38]. A large volume of lymph node metastasis related to multifocality may be an important risk factor of PTC recurrence. In contrast, recurrence in the remnant thyroid gland was infrequent.

Microscopic PTC may exist in the remnant thyroid gland with high probability, but it did not worsen the prognosis of the multifocal PTC patients. Some studies have reported that PTC found in the remaining thyroid at the time of CTx has no impact on recurrence [13, 39]. All the patients who developed recurrence except for one in the unifocal PTC group who developed lung metastasis were able to be salvaged by a second operation. Complications such as postoperative hematoma, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, or hypoparathyroidism are reported to occur in 5–20% of the patients undergoing CTx [40,41,42]. The timing of the CTx does not influence the permanent complication rate [42].

Non-TTx is a feasible operative procedure for maintaining the postoperative thyroid function and avoiding hypoparathyroidism. Recurrence in lymph nodes or remnant thyroid occurred more often, but not significantly so, in pathologically multifocal PTC patients than in pathologically unifocal PTC patients who treated with non-TTx. Such cases of recurrence were able to be cured by reoperation performed at the time that recurrence was discovered. Performing with non-TTx treatment is acceptable for non-high-risk incidentally multifocal PTC. CTx can be postponed until the time of the evident recurrence.

Limitations of this study include its short follow-up time and small sample size, which may have masked the differences. Further studies with a longer follow-up and larger sample size are required to confirm these findings.

Conclusion

The prognosis of PTC with pathological multifocality treated by non-TTx was not inferior to that of unifocal PTC. Non-TTx is a feasible operative procedure for clinically unifocal PTC without high risk regardless of microscopic multifocality. Immediate CTx is not necessary when microscopic foci are proven.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

CTx:

Completion thyroidectomy

DDFS:

Distant disease-free survival

DFS:

Disease-free survival

LDFS:

Lymph node disease-free survival

Non-TTx:

Non-total thyroidectomy

NS:

Not significant

OR:

Odds ratio

PTC:

Papillary thyroid carcinoma

RDFS:

Remnant thyroid disease-free survival

SD:

Standard deviation

TTx:

Total thyroidectomy

References

  1. Miranda-Filho A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bray F, Cao B, Franceschi S, Vaccarella S, et al. Thyroid cancer incidence trends by histology in 25 countries: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Takami H, Ito Y, Okamoto T, Yoshida A. Therapeutic strategy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in Japan based on a newly established guideline managed by Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgeons and Japanese Association of Endocrine Surgeons. World J Surg. 2011;35:111–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito Y, Onoda N, Okamoto T. The revised clinical practice guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Associations of Endocrine Surgeons: core questions and recommendations for treatments of thyroid cancer. Endocr J. 2020;67:669–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iacobone M, Jansson S, Barczyński M, Goretzki P. Multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma--a consensus report of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES). Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2014;399:141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pasieka JL, Thompson NW, McLeod MK, Burney RE, Macha M. The incidence of bilateral well-differentiated thyroid cancer found at completion thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 1992;16:711–6 discussion 716-717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee KJ, Cho YJ, Kim JG, Lee DH. How many contralateral papillary thyroid carcinomas can be missed? World J Surg. 2013;37:780–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pacini F, Elisei R, Capezzone M, Miccoli P, Molinaro E, Basolo F, et al. Contralateral papillary thyroid cancer is frequent at completion thyroidectomy with no difference in low- and high-risk patients. Thyroid. 2001;11:877–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koo BS, Lim HS, Lim YC, Yoon YH, Kim YM, Park YH, et al. Occult contralateral carcinoma in patients with unilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lodewijk L, Kluijfhout WP, Kist JW, Stegeman I, Plukker JT, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, et al. Characteristics of contralateral carcinomas in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer larger than 1 cm. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2016;401:365–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu ZG, Yan XQ, Su RS, Ma ZS, Xie BJ, Cao FL. How many contralateral carcinomas in patients with unilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are preoperatively misdiagnosed as benign? World J Surg. 2017;41:129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turanli S, Aslan S, Cetin A. Clinical significance of residual occult malignancy in thyroid carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32:398–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang F, Zheng B, Yu X, Wang X, Wang S, Teng W. Risk factors for contralateral occult carcinoma in patients with unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:675643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang W, Kong L, Guo H, Chen X. Prevalence and predictor for malignancy of contralateral thyroid nodules in patients with unilateral PTMC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Connect. 2021;10:656–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yihao L, Shuo L, Pu X, Zipeng W, Hanlin S, Qungang C, et al. Risk factors for contralateral occult papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with clinical unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case-control study. Int J Endocrinol. 2022;2022:5112985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harries V, Wang LY, McGill M, Xu B, Tuttle RM, Wong RJ, et al. Should multifocality be an indication for completion thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma? Surgery. 2020;167:10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosai J, Fagin JA, Piana S, Albores Saavedra J, Franssila KO, Parasad ML, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma. In: Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, editors. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th edition. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017. p. 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mendelsohn AH, Elashoff DA, Abemayor E, St John MA. Surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: is lobectomy enough? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adam MA, Pura J, Gu L, Dinan MA, Tyler DS, Reed SD, et al. Extent of surgery for papillary thyroid cancer is not associated with survival: an analysis of 61,775 patients. Ann Surg. 2014;260:601–5 discussion 605-607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nixon IJ, Ganly I, Patel SG, Palmer FL, Whitcher MM, Tuttle RM, et al. Thyroid lobectomy for treatment of well differentiated intrathyroid malignancy. Surgery. 2012;151:571–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsui KP, Kwan WY, Chow TL. Total vs hemithyroidectomy for intermediate risk papillary thyroid cancer: a 23 year retrospective study in a tertiary center. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;40:431–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu J, Zhang Z, Huang H, Xu S, Liu Y, Liu S, et al. Total thyroidectomy versus lobectomy for intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a single-institution matched-pair analysis. Oral Oncol. 2019;90:17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vargas-Pinto S, Romero Arenas MA. Lobectomy compared to total thyroidectomy for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Res. 2019;242:244–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross DS, Litofsky D, Ain KB, Bigos T, Brierley JD, Cooper DS, et al. Recurrence after treatment of micropapillary thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1043–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Joseph KR, Edirimanne S, Eslick GD. Multifocality as a prognostic factor in thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;50:121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim HJ, Sohn SY, Jang HW, Kim SW, Chung JH. Multifocality, but not bilaterality, is a predictor of disease recurrence/persistence of papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2013;37:376–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng JW, Qu Z, Qin AC, Pan H, Ye J, Jiang Y. Significance of multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1820–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JM. The clinical importance of multifocality on tumor recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Gland Surg. 2021;10:273–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang F, Yu X, Shen X, Zhu G, Huang Y, Liu R, et al. The prognostic value of tumor multifocality in clinical outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:3241–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiriakopoulos A, Petralias A, Linos D. Multifocal versus solitary papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2016;40:2139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang T, He L, Wang Z, Dong W, Sun W, Zhang P, et al. The differences between multifocal and unifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma in unilateral lobe: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:657237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chow SM, Law SC, Chan JK, Au SK, Yau S, Lau WH. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid-prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and multifocality. Cancer. 2003;98:31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim H, Kwon H, Moon BI. Association of multifocality with prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;147:847–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin JD, Chao TC, Hsueh C, Kuo SF. High recurrent rate of multicentric papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2609–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schindler AM, van Melle G, Evequoz B, Scazziga B. Prognostic factors in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer. 1991;68:324–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sciuto R, Romano L, Rea S, Marandino F, Sperduti I, Maini CL. Natural history and clinical outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 1503 patients treated at a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1728–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward DL, et al. The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid. 2012;22:1144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Grigsby PW, Reddy RM, Moley JF, Hall BL. Contralateral papillary thyroid cancer at completion thyroidectomy has no impact on recurrence or survival after radioiodine treatment. Surgery. 2006;140:1043–7 discussion 1047-1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sawant R, Hulse K, Sohrabi S, Yeo JCL, Pal K, Gibb FW, et al. The impact of completion thyroidectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1171–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kupferman ME, Mandel SJ, DiDonato L, Wolf P, Weber RS. Safety of completion thyroidectomy following unilateral lobectomy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tan MP, Agarwal G, Reeve TS, Barraclough BH, Delbridge LW. Impact of timing on completion thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:802–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrine Surgery, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yoko Omi, Kento Haniu, Hidenori Kamio, Mikiko Fujimoto, Yusaku Yoshida, Kiyomi Horiuchi & Takahiro Okamoto

Authors
  1. Yoko Omi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kento Haniu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hidenori Kamio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mikiko Fujimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yusaku Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kiyomi Horiuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takahiro Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YO designed the study. Survey distribution and data collection were performed by YO, KH, HK, MF, YY, and KH. Data analysis and writing of the manuscript were performed by YO. Critical revision was performed by YY, KH, and TO. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoko Omi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University (reference number: 4842), and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omi, Y., Haniu, K., Kamio, H. et al. Pathological multifocality is not a prognosis factor of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a single-center, retrospective study. World J Surg Onc 20, 394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02869-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02869-8

Keywords

  • Papillary thyroid carcinoma
  • Multifocal

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us