Skip to main content

The role of systemic immuno-inflammatory factors in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a cohort retrospective study



Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy, surgery being the only potentially curative treatment. The systemic inflammatory response is an important factor in the development of cancer. There is still controversy regarding its role in pancreatic cancer.


Our study is a retrospective observational cohort study. We included patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), who underwent surgical resection in our hospital, between January 2012 and December 2019. We gathered information from preoperative and postoperative blood tests. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were determined.


We included 312 patients. All the immune-inflammatory scores assessed significantly changed after the surgery. The impact on overall survival of these markers showed that only some of the postoperative scores predicted survival: high PLR had a negative prognostic impact, while high lymphocyte and PNI values had a positive effect on overall survival.


The circulating immune cells and their values integrated in the assessed prognostic scores suffer statistically significant changes after curative pancreatic surgery. Only the postoperative values of lymphocyte count, PLR, and PNI seem to influence the overall survival in PDAC.

Trial registration–identifier NCT05025371.


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most frequent pancreatic tumor, comprising about 90% of all pancreatic neoplasms [1]. Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with a survival rate of about 5% at 5 years [2]. The poor prognosis is also reflected by the incidence rate that is almost equal to the mortality rate [2]. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, integrated in a multimodal approach [3]; however, long-term results remain poor. Therefore, a better understanding of the biology of pancreatic cancer, as well as finding easy to use markers for diagnosis and prognosis would be useful in clinical practice [4].

Systemic inflammation has been recognized as a factor with an important role in the development of cancer [5, 6]. The systemic inflammatory response has been quantified through different scores (prognostic nutritional index, systemic immune-inflammation index) or ratios between different circulating immune cells (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio). Although these factors are gaining more interest even in pancreatic cancer, there is still controversy regarding their role in this type of cancer. Since these are easy to determine and easy to use scores, that might improve the management of PDAC, further investigations are necessary.

Our study intends to analyze the role of the available systemic immune-inflammatory scores on a cohort of patients with resectable PDAC from our surgical center. The objective is to assess the utility of these scores, calculated based on both preoperative and postoperative blood work, in predicting the prognosis of patients that underwent surgery with curative intent for PDAC. Another objective of our study is to assess the dynamic of these scores after curative surgery.


Our study is a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (No. 112/15.04.2021), as well as the Ethics Committee of Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Cluj-Napoca (No. 4580/01.04.2021). The study was conducted based on a previously designed study protocol; the study was registered at, having the identifier NCT05025371. The presented study will be reported according to STROCSS guidelines (strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery) [7].

The study population consisted in the patients treated in the Surgical Department of Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Cluj-Napoca between January 2012 and December 2019. The last time of follow-up was April 2021.

We included only the patients with the final histopathological diagnosis of PDAC, who underwent pancreatic surgical resections. We excluded patients with other histopathological diagnoses, patients who underwent palliative interventions and patients with insufficient or incomplete data.

A number of 2396 records of patients with pancreatic tumors were identified in the selected period. After excluding the patients who were inoperable and who underwent palliative procedures, a number of 499 patients who underwent curative surgery was obtained. We then excluded the patients with other definitive histopathological diagnoses: 351 patients diagnosed with PDAC remained. An additional 39 patients were excluded due to insufficient data, so 312 patients were included in our study.

We gathered information from preoperative blood tests and postoperative blood tests. The preoperative blood tests used were those done at admission, before any treatment was administered. The postoperative blood work used was the one at discharge. All blood cell counts will be represented as count *103/μL. Albumin was represented as g/dL. Based on these blood counts, we calculated different immune-inflammatory scores, using the following formulas:

  • NLR was defined as neutrophil/lymphocyte count.

  • LMR was defined as lymphocyte/monocyte count.

  • PLR was defined as platelet/lymphocyte count.

  • SII was defined as (platelet*neutrophil)/lymphocyte count.

  • PNI was defined as 10*albumin + 5*lymphocyte count.

We analyzed the difference between the preoperative and postoperative values. Each parameter was correlated with the overall survival of patients. The overall survival (OS) has been defined as the time from the day of surgery to the time of death from any cause.

We have also gathered other histopathological parameters, like stage, grade of differentiation, nodal positivity (N), extranodal extension (ENE), perineural invasion (Pn), lymphatic invasion (L), and vascular invasion (V).

Our institute has a recommended follow-up protocol: check-ups at every 3 months in the first postoperative year, and afterwards, check-ups at every 6 months for the following 5 years.

Data analysis was performed using R 4.0.1. The cut-off point was chosen taking into consideration the Youden index. Normality of the distribution was calculated using Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram visualization and evaluating skewness and kurtosis. Non-normally distributed variables were represented as median (quartile 1, quartile 3). Difference in the preoperative and postoperative variables was performed using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon signed rank test. The correlation between an ordinal variable and a continuous variable was assessed using Kendall’s tau. Survival analysis was represented using Kaplan-Meier curves. Significance of the Kaplan-Meier curves was assessed using the log-rank test. Univariate survival analysis was performed using a univariate Cox proportional hazards model. A p value under 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariable survival analysis was performed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. In this model, we included the variables that were shown to be statistically significant in the univariable Cox proportional hazards model. The immunoinflammatory markers were not all included in the same model as there are certain components that are common in their calculation.


In the current study, we included a total of 312 patients with their general characteristics presented in Table 1.

Table 1 General characteristics of the cohort

In this cohort, we observed that all the immune-inflammatory markers assessed presented significant changes after the surgery (Table 2).

Table 2 The values of immuno-inflammatory markers before and after the surgical intervention—value changes after surgery

Further, we assessed the impact on overall survival of the value of these markers before and after the surgical intervention. We chose to filter and dichotomize our data by comparing the values over percentile 75% with those under percentile 25%. This has been performed to determine if extreme values of the selected parameters have an impact regarding OS. Using this approach, we observed that only some of the postoperative values predicted survival. Patients with low postoperative lymphocyte count (less than 1.16 compared to greater than 2), high postoperative PLR (greater than 285 compared to less than 145), and low postoperative PNI (less than 34 compared to more than 43) had worse OS (Table 3). More specifically, high PLR had a negative prognostic impact, while high lymphocyte and PNI values had a positive effect on overall survival (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate Cox proportional hazards model using the filtered and dichotomized immuno-inflammatory values on overall survival

To better observe the effect of the significant immuno-inflammatory markers on overall survival, we plotted Kaplan-Meier curves for those considering all quartiles (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves showing the association of postoperative lymphocyte count, PLR, and PNI on overall survival

Added to this, we also calculated the cut-off points for the aforementioned variables considering the death at 1, 2, and 3 years (Table 4). Given the relatively short overall survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we also assessed what are the optimal cut-off values that have a relevance in predicting survival at 1, 2, and 3 years. As it can be observed, in the case of the three postoperative immunoinflammatory markers shown to be associated with overall survival (PLR, PNI, and lymphocytes), the cut-offs have similar values, showing the values around which, a cut-off can be clinically useful. It has to be mentioned that the use of a fixed cut-off, although may be attractive for the sake of simplicity, it does not necessarily reflect the reality, where multiple close cut-off values can have similar associations with overall survival.

Table 4 Cut-off points for death at 1, 2, and 3 years.

We have assessed in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model the stage, grade, resection margin, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, node positivity, extranodal, postoperative PLR higher than 250, postoperative PNI higher than 40, and postoperative lymphocytes higher than 1.5 (Table 5). These cut-offs were chosen because of the previously presented results and rounded so they would be easier to be applied in the clinical setting.

Table 5 Univariate analysis on overall survival

We have also done a multivariate survival analysis, showing that the postoperative PNI, PLR, and lymphocytes have statistical significance in predicting the overall survival (Table 6).

Table 6 Multivariate analysis on overall survival


Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy despite the current available treatments. Our study reunites a cohort of patients with PDAC, surgically treated in our tertiary center with experience in hepatobiliary surgery. We intended to analyze if the host’s immune response will influence the survival of patients; we quantified this immune response by known immune-inflammatory scores (NLR, PLR, LMR, PNI, and SII).

We retrospectively gathered a cohort of 312 patients, offering a large sample of patients compared to other published studies [8,9,10]. The patients included in the present study are classified as stages I through III; most of the included patients were stage IIB. The included patients did not receive any neoadjuvant treatment. Even tough other studies included all stages of PDAC [11] in their analysis, we believe that a more specific approach guided toward only resectable cases can offer important information for the clinical management of patients that undergo surgical treatment, minimizing the discrepancies caused by a heterogenous cohort of patients.

Alteration in the systemic inflammatory response and nutritional deterioration are encountered in cancer patients [12, 13], with the development and progression of cancer being closely related with the host-inflammatory response [14,15,16]. Several inflammation-based prognostic scores were developed for the evaluation of patients with cancer. Regarding the dynamic of the circulating immune cells in patients with cancer, it was observed that neutrophilia is an indicator for systemic inflammatory response and might play a role in carcinogenesis, lymphopenia reflects host immunosuppression and has a negative prognostic value, thrombocytosis is also a negative prognostic factor due to its possible role in cancer progression, while a high monocyte count is correlated with unfavorable prognosis [17]. These findings are the rationale behind the NLR, LMR, and PLR scores. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, while initially developed for the evaluation of critically ill patients, has made its way into the evaluation of oncological patients [18,19,20], being widely used in various types of cancer. However, NLR and the other immune scores have not yet found their role in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer, controversies regarding their signification still exist [8]. The systemic immune-inflammation index was first described in hepatocellular carcinoma [21], as a non-invasive marker that uses an integrated index based on peripheral neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts; since then, its use has been extended to various types of cancer [22]. The prognostic nutritional index combines the evaluation of the immune and nutritional status, being first developed to evaluate postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery [23]; subsequently, more research has found that PNI has an important prognostic role in cancer patients [24].

Our study proved that important changes occur in the circulating immune cells populations after the resection of the tumor. The total neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet count, as well as the NLR, PLR, and SII significantly increased after surgery. On the other hand, the lymphocyte count, LMR, and PNI score decreased. Only a few other studies in medical literature explore the postoperative dynamic of these immune scores, most studies relying only on preoperative values [25]. The postoperative alterations might be caused by the surgical stress, as well as the removal of the tumor itself. Hoshimoto et al. [25] also reported significant postoperative changes in immune-inflammatory markers, except for PLR and LMR. Although, the reported dynamic was different that the one registered in our study—for example, the neutrophil count and the NLR decreased postoperatively.

In our analysis, no preoperative scores predicted overall survival, at any cut-off value used. Various studies in medical literature reported positive results regarding the prognostic power of various immune-inflammatory markers discussed in our study; negative results have been reported as well [9, 26,27,28,29]. Furthermore, a cut-off value for any of these variables was not established, different values being used in different studies [9, 26].

Interestingly, we did find prognostic value for three postoperative markers: the total lymphocyte count, PLR, and PNI score. A high PLR was associated with low survival, while a high lymphocyte count and PNI were associated with good survival. As mentioned before, there are very few reports regarding the importance of postoperative immune-inflammatory markers in the prognosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report the importance of the early postoperative PLR and PNI as prognostic markers in PDAC. Kim et al. [30] analyzed the changes in the immune status after curative pancreatic resections, concluding that the total lymphocyte count and NLR at 1 and 6 months postoperatively are effective predictors for survival. The long-term dynamic of immune markers after pancreatic surgery in oncological patients is an unexplored subject that deserves further investigations.

The strength of the present study relies on the large sample size of patients, with homogenous characteristics: only pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in resectable stages, without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We are also one of the few studies that analyses the postoperative dynamic of immune-inflammatory factors. Limitations are related especially to the retrospective nature of the study. We only analyzed the impact on the overall survival, the retrospective design did not permit the correlation of the immune-inflammatory scores with disease specific complications.

Since the results are promising, but not specific enough to be replicated on a large scale and used in clinical practice, we believe that future research should further explore the topic of immune-inflammatory markers in PDAC with a focus on specific subtypes of immune cells and their role in the progression of cancer. Even more so, since the dynamic of all the immune-inflammatory markers seems to be modified postoperatively, we believe that studying these markers at longer intervals after surgery can offer in depth information regarding their long-term dynamic.

The circulating immune cells as well as their values integrated in prognostic scores (NLR, LMR, PLR, PNI, SII) suffer statistically significant changes after curative pancreatic surgery. The preoperative immune-inflammatory scores analyzed in the present article are not predictive for the overall survival of patients. Only the postoperative values of lymphocyte count, PLR, and PNI seem to influence the overall survival in PDAC. A high PLR had a negative prognostic impact, while high lymphocyte and PNI values had a positive effect on overall survival.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma


Prognostic nutritional index


Systemic immune-inflammation index


Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio


Platelet to lymphocyte ratio


Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio


  1. Haeberle L, Esposito I. Pathology of pancreatic cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, Hollebecque A, Burtin P, Goéré D, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v56–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambert A, Schwarz L, Borbath I, Henry A, van Laethem J-L, Malka D, et al. An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919875568.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris M, Brekke M, Dinant G-J, Esteva M, Hoffman R, Marzo-Castillejo M, et al. Primary care practitioners’ diagnostic action when the patient may have cancer: an exploratory vignette study in 20 European countries. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e035678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, Fletcher CD, O’Reilly DS, et al. A comparison of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with cancer. A Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1073–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, Dowlut N, Iosifidis C, Mathew G, et al. STROCSS 2019 Guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg. 2019;72:156–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad J, Grimes N, Farid S, Morris-Stiff G. Inflammatory response related scoring systems in assessing the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014;13:474–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mowbray NG, Griffith D, Hammoda M, Shingler G, Kambal A, Al-Sarireh B. A meta-analysis of the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting survival after pancreatic cancer resection. HPB. 2018;20:379–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh D, Pyo J-S, Son BK. Prognostic roles of inflammatory markers in pancreatic cancer: comparison between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:9745601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SH, Chung MJ, Kim B, Lee HS, Lee HJ, Heo JY, et al. The significance of the prognostic nutritional index for all stages of pancreatic cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2017;69:512–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12:223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arrieta O, Michel Ortega RM, Villanueva-Rodríguez G, Serna-Thomé MG, Flores-Estrada D, Diaz-Romero C, et al. Association of nutritional status and serum albumin levels with development of toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy: a prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Argilés JM, Busquets S, López-Soriano FJ. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003;6:401–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinoshita A, Onoda H, Imai N, Iwaku A, Oishi M, Fushiya N, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:988–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Krakowska M, Dębska-Szmich S, Czyżykowski R, Zadrożna-Nowak A, Potemski P. The prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. Prz Gastroenterol. 2018;13:218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F, Justin TA, Keeling NJ. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:181–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts--rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102:5–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Wu W, Dong L, Yang C, Fan P, Wu H. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts persistent organ failure and in-hospital mortality in an Asian Chinese population of acute pancreatitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu B, Yang X-R, Xu Y, Sun Y-F, Sun C, Guo W, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6212–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J-H, Zhai E-T, Yuan Y-J, Wu K-M, Xu J-B, Peng J-J, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:6261–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi. 1984;85:1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hua X, Long Z-Q, Huang X, Deng J-P, He Z-Y, Guo L, et al. The value of prognostic nutritional Index (PNI) in predicting survival and guiding radiotherapy of patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;9:1562.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoshimoto S, Hishinuma S, Shirakawa H, Tomikawa M, Ozawa I, Ogata Y. Validation and clinical usefulness of pre- and postoperative systemic inflammatory parameters as prognostic markers in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2020;20:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou Y, Cheng S, Fathy AH, Qian H, Zhao Y. Prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 17 cohort studies. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1899–908.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu R, Ma J, Hu G. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: prognostic significance and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;481:142–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li S, Tian G, Chen Z, Zhuang Y, Li G. Prognostic role of the prognostic nutritional index in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer. 2019;71:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jomrich G, Gruber ES, Winkler D, Hollenstein M, Gnant M, Sahora K, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicts poor survival in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:610–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim EY, Hong TH. Changes in total lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative pancreatectomy in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma and their prognostic role. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:1102–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


“Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Financing Contract number 1032/60/13 January 2021 for Doctoral Research Projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



DS, CP, and NA have designed and conceptualized the present study. CP, DS, and SP have been involved in the acquisition of data. SP has done the statistical analysis of the respective data. CP, DS, AS, and NA have interpreted the study data and have analyzed it in connection with the published data. CP and DS have written the manuscript. AS and NA have substantially revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Popa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has the ethical approval of the Ethical Committee of Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Cluj-Napoca (No. 112/15.04.2021), as well as the Ethics Committee of Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Cluj-Napoca (No. 4580/01.04.2021). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlanger, D., Popa, C., Pașca, S. et al. The role of systemic immuno-inflammatory factors in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a cohort retrospective study. World J Surg Onc 20, 144 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: