Skip to main content

Novel nomogram for predicting risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after right colectomy for cancer

A Correction to this article was published on 10 March 2022

This article has been updated



Early postoperative small bowel obstruction (EPSBO) is a common complication after colorectal cancer surgery. Few studies have specifically studied risk factors for early small bowel obstruction after right colectomy, especially in establishing predictive models. The purpose of the current study was to establish an effective nomogram to predict the incidence of EPSBO after right colectomy.


The current study retrospectively analyzed data from a total of 424 patients who underwent right colectomy in a local hospital from January 2014 to March 2021. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for EPSBO after right colectomy. A nomogram was established by independent risk factors, and the prediction performance of the model was evaluated using an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration chart.


A total of 45 patients (10.6%) developed early small bowel obstruction after right colectomy. Male sex, history of abdominal surgery, open surgery, long operative time, anastomotic leakage, and preoperative albumin were closely related to EPSBO. Analysis of postoperative rehabilitation indices showed that EPSBO remarkably slowed the postoperative rehabilitation speed of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male sex, open surgery, operative time, and anastomotic leakage were independent risk factors (P < 0.05), and the operation time had the greatest impact on EPSBO. On the basis of multivariate logistic regression, a nomogram was constructed, which showed moderate accuracy in predicting EPSBO, with a C-statistic of 0.716. The calibration chart showed good consistency between the predicted probability and ideal probability.


The current study constructed a nomogram based on the clinical data of patients who underwent right colectomy, which had moderate predictability and could provide reference value for clinicians to evaluate the risk of EPSBO.


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant tumor worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths [1]. Although various treatments for colon cancer have been reported, surgical resection is still the most important treatment [2]. However, there were some studies showed that surgical resection is associated with various complications, with incidence rates ranging between 10% and 37%, which seriously affects the postoperative quality of life and survival time of patients [3]. In particular, early postoperative small bowel obstruction (EPSBO) is a complication of colorectal cancer surgery. The incidence of EPSBO after colorectal cancer surgery was 4.5–12.8% and that the incidence of EPSBO after right hemicolectomy remained high without declining [4, 5]. Previous studies also reported that EPSBO inhibited early oral intake and early ambulation, prolonged postoperative hospital stay, increased cost of hospitalization, and reduced utilization rate of hospital beds [6]. In addition, extension of hospital stay leads to the inability of patients to undergo timely postoperative adjuvant therapy (less than 8 weeks), which reduces the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy in patients with colorectal cancer [7]. There have study also showed that EPSBO was an independent risk factor for secondary adhesive intestinal obstruction [8].

Different surgical methods and surgical ranges for right colon cancer have been used, and these have led to different incidences of postoperative complications, including complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymph node dissection, standard operation and extended right colectomy, and differences in the medial boundary of lymph node dissection [9,10,11]. Currently, few studies on risk factors for EPSBO after right hemicolectomy have been reported, especially to establish predictive models. Therefore, there is a need to establish a predictive model of EPSBO after right hemicolectomy and determine controllable risk factors. Few previous studies have explored risk factors for EPSBO after colorectal cancer surgery, including, male sex, operative time, ASA > grade 3, open surgery, emergency surgery, intraoperative blood loss, previous abdominal surgery history, and defunctioning ileostomy [4,5,6, 12,13,14]. The purpose of the current study was to construct a nomogram to predict the incidence of EPSBO after right colectomy. This will help clinicians control risk factors in patients with right colectomy and reduce EPSBO incidence, shorten postoperative hospital stay and improve quality of life.



In total, 424 patients who underwent right colectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2014 to March 2021 were retrospectively recruited. EPSBO can be diagnosed if the patient has three or more clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, no exhaust, or defecation for more than 24 h within 30 days after colectomy, or signs such as abdominal tenderness, hyperactivity, metal sound, abdominal X-ray, or CT examination indicates small intestinal dilatation and gas-liquid level [4]. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent right colectomy, which was confirmed as malignant by pathology. The exclusion criteria included a previous history of intraperitoneal radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or inflammatory bowel disease [4, 13]. Recruited study patients were divided into two groups: the EPSBO and no EPSBO groups. All operations were undertaken by experienced gastrointestinal surgeons. The anastomotic method was stapler anastomoses. All patients underwent adequate preoperative evaluation, and there were no significant differences in perioperative management. The current retrospective study was approved by the hospital ethics committee.


Variables analyzed as EPSBO risk factors included age, sex, anemia, preoperative obstruction, hypertension, diabetes, BMI, emergency operation, history of abdominal surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, ASA score, type of surgery (standard or extended), surgical approach (open or laparoscopy), blood loss, operative time, tumor diameter, preoperative NLR (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio), preoperative albumin, pathological T stage, preoperative CEA, pathological N stage, metastasis, anastomotic leakage, and incision infection.

Statistical analyses

IBM SPSS software (version 22.0) was used for statistical analyses. The results are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) or median (quartile 1, quartile 3). Data conforming to a normal distribution were analyzed using t tests (two-tailed), whereas data not conforming to a normal distribution were analyzed using Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests. Fisher’s exact test or Pearson χ2 test were used to analyze grade data between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used, where variables with P < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Forest plots, nomograms, ROC curves and correction curves were drawn using R software (version 4.0.5). Through 1000 bootstrap resamplings, internal verification of the nomogram was completed, and the C-statistic/area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate the performance of the model. A calibration curve was used to show consistency between the observation frequency and prediction probability.



In total, 424 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy were included in the current study. The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The findings showed that EPSBO occurred in 45 patients (10.6%). In addition, male sex (P = 0.013), history of abdominal surgery (P = 0.026), open surgery (P = 0.012), operative time (P = 0.002), preoperative albumin (P = 0.029), and anastomotic leakage (P = 0.024) were significantly associated with EPSBO and were considered risk factors. However, in the current study, ASA ≥ 3, emergency surgery, intraoperative bleeding and preoperative intestinal obstruction were not strongly related to EPSBO (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken. The findings, presented in Table 2, showed that male sex, history of abdominal surgery, open surgery, operative time, preoperative albumin, and anastomotic leakage were closely related to EPSBO. The multivariate analysis showed that sex (OR 2.426, 95%CI 1.191–4.941; P = 0.015), open surgery (OR 2.181, 95%CI 1.045–4.554; P = 0.038), operative time (OR = 1.026,95%CI 1.010–1.043; P = 0.002), and anastomotic leakage (OR 3.094,95%CI 1.142–8.377, P = 0.026) were independent risk factors for EPSBO. Of note, the operative time had the greatest effect on EPSBO. A forest plot was drawn based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors of EPSBO after right colectomy
Fig. 1
figure 1

Forest plot

Nomogram for EPSPO

A nomogram to predict the risk of EPSBO after right colectomy was constructed based on the results obtained by multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram showed that male sex, open surgery, operative time, and anastomotic leakage were significantly correlated with EPSBO (Fig. 2). Each factor in the nomogram had a scoring standard, with a higher total score indicating a greater risk of EPSBO. For example, a male patient who underwent open surgery with an operative time of 150 min and no anastomotic leakage had a total score of 95 points (20 points for male, 25 points for open surgery, 50 points for operative time, 0 points for anastomotic leakage), leading to an approximately 20% predicted risk of EPSBO. The area under the ROC curve was then computed, which showed that the nomogram had good predictive ability. The AUC value of the model was 0.716 (Fig. 3A), which indicated that the C-statistic value was 0.716 and that the predictive ability of the model for EPSBO risk was medium. The calibration curve showed that the predictive model established in the current study was close to the ideal state, indicating good calibration (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Nomogram for predicting risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after right colectomy. Locate male or female on the horizontal axis of gender. Draw a line up to the point axis to determine the number of points toward EPSBO the patient should receive. Repeat this process for other horizontal axes, drawing a straight line to the point axis at a time. Then, calculate the sum of points for all risk factors. Draw a straight line down to find out the risk of EPSBO

Fig. 3
figure 3

Validation of the nomogram. A ROC analysis of EPSBO. The AUC value is 0.716 (95% CI, 0.639–0.794). B Calibration plot of the nomogram for EPSBO. The y-axis represents the actual probability of EPSBO. The x-axis represents the estimated probability, and the ideal line is close to the actual line, indicating a good prediction

Postoperative characteristics of patients

The postoperative characteristics of EPSBO patients, including time to first ambulation, day of first flatus, day of first meal, drainage tube removal time, and length of hospital stay, are shown in Table 3. In the EPSBO group, the time to first ambulation was significantly longer than those in the non-EPSBO group. EPSBO prolonged the drainage tube removal time, which led to a significantly higher hospitalization time of patients than those without EPSBO. Patients with anastomotic leakage were excluded to reduce the influence of anastomotic leakage on postoperative rehabilitation indicators, and the data were reanalyzed. The findings are shown in Table 4. Significant differences in time to first ambulation (2.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.6 ± 1.5), length of hospitalization (13.0 ± 4.2 vs. 16.8 ± 5.7) and time to remove drainage tube (9.1 ± 2.5 vs. 11.53 ± 3.6) between the two groups (P < 0.001) were observed. The day of first flatus (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.7) and day of first meal (3.0 ± 1.4 vs 4.1 ± 3.6) in the EPSBO group were longer than those in the non-EPSBO group, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.097 and P = 0.379). Among EPSBO patients who were included in the current study, two patients needed reoperation, one due to incisional hernia, and the other due to internal hernia (2/45, 4.4%). Fortunately, no patients died due to EPSBO.

Table 3 Postoperative characteristics of patients with EPSBO
Table 4 Postoperative characteristics of patients without anastomotic leakage


EPSBO is the most frequent complication in colorectal surgery [12]. Previous studies reported an EPSBO incidence ranging from 4.5 to 12.8% [4]. The diagnosis of EPBO is complicated due to overlap between the symptoms and signs of postoperative patients and those of postoperative recovery, as well as the use of analgesics, which explains the wide range in incidence [5]. The findings of the current study showed an EPSBO incidence rate of 10.6%, which was relatively high. Therefore, it is important to explore risk factors for EPSBO. The current study retrospectively explored risk factors for EPSBO after right colectomy in 424 patients and constructed a nomogram to predict the risk of EPSBO after right colectomy. Previous studies have described many potential risk factors for EPSBO. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the current study established a nomogram containing four risk factors. The C-statistic of this model showed a medium ability to predict the risk of EPSBO. The current study evaluated the risk of EPSBO based on this model to make individualized predictions of EPSBO and took postoperative preventive measures for patients who were assessed as high risk to reduce the burden on patients. Liang Wen Quan et al. [15] predicted prolonged posterior ileus and established a nomogram including preoperative albumin. Lv X et al. [16] established a model to predict bowel obstruction in preoperative colorectal cancer patients with clinical characteristics. The study subjects were mainly patients with preoperative bowel obstruction caused by malignant tumors and used a public database, which was different from our study. The current study is one of few studies focusing on the risk of EPSBO after right colectomy, and few studies have established nomograms for this disease. Therefore, new nomograms are urgently needed.

The findings of the current study showed that the probability of EPSBO was significantly higher in males than in females, which was consistent with previous studies [4, 6, 12, 13, 17]. Male patients may be more prone to EPSBO due to narrow pelvic space and high visceral fat content. However, since right colectomy falls under abdominal surgery, the degree of pelvic stenosis apparently has little effect on operation and postoperative complications. In addition, previous studies indicated that alcoholism and chronic lung disease increase the risk of EPSBO [5], and males account for the vast majority of these cases [18]. The current study did not collect data on alcoholism or chronic lung disease, although it can be postulated that the increased risk of EPSBO in males is due to multiple factors. Open surgery leads to an inflammatory response, whereas the use of laparoscopic surgery reduces abdominal injury and direct contact with intestines, resulting in a reduced inflammatory response and adhesion. This explains why open surgery is more prone to EPSBO and was an independent risk factor in the current study [19]. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies undertaken by Nakajima et al. [20], Masoomi Hossein et al. [5], and Eto Ken et al. [6]. Notably, some researchers believe that the incidence of EPSBO in the two operations is similar, which indicates that, although laparoscopic surgery reduces the inflammatory response caused by abdominal injury, laparoscopic surgery has a long operative time. However, the current study conducted subgroup analysis and found no significant difference in operative time between the two operations. Therefore, the current study suggests that open surgery is a risk factor for EPSBO in right colectomy, although technical variations among different surgeons may cause confounding bias.

A history of abdominal surgery increases the risk of EPSBO, which has been confirmed by previous studies [21, 22]. After multivariate analysis and controlling for confounding factors, a history of abdominal surgery was not an independent risk factor for EPSBO (P = 0.111). A long operative time was considered a very important independent risk factor in current and previous studies [4, 12, 14, 22]. Therefore, surgeons should complete the operation as soon as possible while ensuring surgical treatment to reduce complications caused by long operative times. The current study found a close relationship between preoperative serum albumin level and EPSBO, which indicates that poor systemic nutritional status increases the risk of EPSBO after right colectomy. This is consistent with the findings of Pan Chi et al. [14], who hypothesized that preoperative low albumin induced EPSBO. Hypoproteinemia leads to intestinal swelling, which results in a local inflammatory response in the small intestine and increases the risk of EPSBO. In addition, the current study showed that anastomotic leakage increased the risk of EPSBO. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of EPSBO patients showed that most EPSBOs occurred after anastomotic leakage. Therefore, the inflammatory response promotes the formation of intestinal obstruction by activating polymorphonuclear leukocytes [23].

Although extended resection (P = 0.365) and SMA as the medial boundary of lymph node dissection (P = 0.347) expanded the operation area, they did not significantly increase the risk of EPSBO. However, the dissection of lymph nodes on the SMA surface led to severe chylous ascites. Moreover, previous studies have shown that lymph node dissection damages autonomic nerves and leads to gastrointestinal dysfunction [10]. In clinical practice, we found a high incidence of chylous ascites after right colectomy; After completing this manuscript, we studied the risk factors of chylous ascites with curiosity and published it before the acceptance of this article [24]. Emergency surgery for patients with right colon cancer was generally due to complete intestinal obstruction, followed by intestinal perforation. Notably, emergency surgery was rarely performed for intestinal obstruction of right colon cancer in the study. Generally, endoscopic colonic stent implantation was performed first, which transformed emergency surgery into elective surgery, thereby increasing the possibility of laparoscopic surgery and speeding up postoperative rehabilitation. A previous study by Ji Woong BAE showed that 93% (13/14) of patients in the stent group underwent elective laparoscopic surgery [25].

The effect of EPSBO on postoperative rehabilitation of patients was explored in the current study by analyzing indicators of postoperative rehabilitation, including first ambulation time, day of first flatus, day of first meal, removal of drainage time, and length of hospital stay. We found that early out-of-bed activities can reduce the risk of EPSBO, which emphasizes the importance of early out-of-bed activities and verifies that ERAS can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function [26, 27]. The findings showed that EPSBO significantly prolonged the drainage tube removal (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 14.4 ± 6.0 P < 0.001) and hospital stay (13.6 ± 5.5 vs. 18.5 ± 7.6 P < 0.001), which greatly affected the rehabilitation of patients. Anastomotic leakage also significantly prolongs the length of hospital stay [28]. The findings of the current study showed that anastomotic leakage was a risk factor for EPSBO. Therefore, it was necessary to exclude patients with anastomotic leakage to more accurately show the effect of EPSBO on hospital stay. The findings showed that EPSBO still significantly prolonged hospital stay (13.0 ± 4.2 vs. 16.8 ± 5.7) after excluding patients with anastomotic leakage, indicating that EPSBO cannot be ignored. However, we found that the eating time and time to remove the drainage tube were late, which seemed inconsistent with the ERAS protocol. The main reason was the large time span of case collection, different competent doctors and patient safety considerations. In addition, we believe that EPSBO leads to the prolongation of drainage tube removal time. Patients with EPSBO are prone to abdominal pain, abdominal distention, or other symptoms that are necessary to eliminate anastomotic leakage, chylous ascites, and other life-threatening complications. On the other hand, EPSBO may lead to a large amount of plasma exudation and peritonitis, and it is therefore necessary to delay drainage tube removal.

Reoperation and mortality rates reported in the current study were lower than those of a study by Khrucharoen U et al. involving 184,660 people [29]. However, preventing the occurrence of EPSBO remains an important implication. Some of the risk factors identified in the current study can be controlled. For example, laparoscopic surgery should be used as much as possible, and it is recommended to convert emergency surgery into elective surgery through endoscopic technology to reduce the risk of EPSBO. During the operation, the intestine should be handled carefully, and the operation should be completed as soon as possible without performing optional maneuvers [4]. Hypoproteinemia should be corrected actively before the operation, and anastomotic leakage should be prevented. In addition, intraoperative preventive operations, including the use of starch-free gloves and flushing with normal saline below 37 °C, should be considered, which may reduce the incidence of small intestinal adhesion and obstruction [30]. For patients with high scores, antiadhesion drugs, such as sodium hyaluronate, can be given appropriately, or moxibustion can be used to reduce the risk of intestinal obstruction [31, 32]. In addition, more attention should be paid to the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) to promote rapid rehabilitation [26, 27, 33]. For example, eating should be resumed as soon as possible, and the drainage tube should be removed early. We can even cooperate with information specialists to design an automatic computer application to better implement personalized management schemes for patients. At present, our department is trying to use this nomogram and is expected to share its practicability in the near future.

According to the latest study, we believe that CME has not proved inferior to traditional surgery in terms of feasibility and safety. And with the expansion of future research samples, this conclusion will be evaluated more accurately [34]. The current study constructed a novel nomogram based on the findings of multivariate logistic regression analysis, including male sex, open surgery, operative time, and anastomotic leakage. The nomogram provided surgeons with a predicted risk of EPSBO. This was established by perioperative clinical data, which can help surgeons formulate personalized preventive measures according to the degree of risk.

The current study had some limitations. First, due to the single-center retrospective design of the current study, potential selection bias could not be avoided. Second, since the current study undertook only internal verification, it was unclear whether the constructed nomogram has universal applicability. Finally, the operations were not performed by the same surgeon, and there may therefore be potential performance bias. The current study envisages prospective multicenter research in the future to improve the performance of the model.


The current study explored risk factors for EPSBO after right colectomy through intergroup comparisons and obtained independent risk factors for EPSBO through multivariate logistic regression. Therefore, a nomogram was constructed to predict EPSBO risk, which has good predictive ability, can accurately provide individualized prediction of EPSBO, and plays an active role in patient management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history



Early postoperative small bowel obstruction


Concordance statistic


Receiver operating characteristic curve


Area under curve


American Society of Anesthesiologists


Odds ratio


Confidence interval


Body mass index


Superior mesenteric artery


Superior mesenteric vein


Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio


Enhanced recovery after surgery


  1. Hirano H, Takashima A, Hamaguchi T, et al. Current status and perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitors for colorectal cancer. Japan J Clin Oncol. 2021;51:10–9. 2020/11/19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: colon cancer, Version 2.2018. J National Comprehensive Cancer Net. 2018;16:359–69. 2018/04/11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnarson Ö, Butt-Tuna S, Syk I. Postoperative complications following colonic resection for cancer are associated with impaired long-term survival. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21:805–15. 2019/03/19.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura Y, Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, et al. Intraoperative maneuvers may affect the development of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: Multicenter prospective cohort study. Int J Surg (London, England). 2021;86:52–6. 2021/01/29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chaudhry O, et al. Predictive factors of early bowel obstruction in colon and rectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2008. J Am College Surg. 2012;214(2012/04/03):831–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eto K, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, et al. Defunctioning ileostomy is a key risk factor for small bowel obstruction after colorectal cancer resection. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:1789–95. 2018/03/02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Massucco P, Fontana A, Mineccia M, et al. Prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label trial, designed to evaluate the best timing of closure of the temporary ileostomy (early versus late) in patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and with indication for adjuvant chemotherapy: the STOMAD (STOMa closure before or after ADjuvant therapy) randomised controlled trial. BMJ open. 2021;11:e044692. 2021/02/21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SY, Park KJ, Ryoo SB, et al. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction is an independent risk factor for subsequent adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing open colectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:3007–14. 2014/08/16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang S, Wang X, Deng Y, et al. Gastrocolic ligament lymph node dissection for transverse colon and hepatic flexure colon cancer: risk of nodal metastases and complications in a large-volume center. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2020;24:2658–60. 2020/07/16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng X, Li H, Lu X, et al. Regional lymph nodes distribution pattern in central area of right-sided colon cancer: in-vivo detection and the update on the clinical exploration. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11:2095–105 2021/06/08.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzarella G, Muttillo EM, Picardi B, et al. Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4945–55. 2021/05/13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suwa K, Ushigome T, Ohtsu M, et al. Risk factors for early postoperative small bowel obstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42:233–8. 2017/07/28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang WS, Park YC, Jo YG, et al. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction after laparotomy for trauma: incidence and risk factors. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018;94:94–101. 2018/02/15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang XJ, Chi P, Lin HM, et al. Risk factors for early postoperative small bowel obstruction after elective colon cancer surgery: an observational study of 1,244 consecutive patients. Digest Surg. 2018;35:49–54. 2017/05/10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang WQ, Zhang KC, Li H, et al. Preoperative albumin levels predict prolonged postoperative ileus in gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:1185–96. 2020/04/02.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lv X, Yu H, Gao P, et al. A nomogram for predicting bowel obstruction in preoperative colorectal cancer patients with clinical characteristics. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:21. 2019/01/20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim CH, Joo JK, Kim HR, et al. The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Advanced Surg Techniq Part A. 2014;24:543–9. 2014/07/26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magitta NF, Walker RW, Apte KK, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and clinical correlates of COPD in a rural setting in Tanzania. Eur Respir J. 2018;51. 2018/02/02.

  19. Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P, et al. Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). Lancet (London, England). 2020;395:33–41. 2020/01/08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakajima J, Sasaki A, Otsuka K, et al. Risk factors for early postoperative small bowel obstruction after colectomy for colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 2010;34:1086–90. 2010/02/13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5472–80. 2016/05/01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheyn D, Bretschneider CE, Mahajan ST, et al. Incidence and risk factors of early postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2019;220:251.e251–9. 2018/11/25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasslan R, Utiyama EM, Marques GM, et al. Inflammatory activity modulation by hypertonic saline and pentoxifylline in a rat model of strangulated closed loop small bowel obstruction. Int J Surg (London, England). 2014;12:594–600. 2014/05/07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hui-Da, Zheng Yu-Rong, Liu Zhen-Ze, Chen Ya-Feng, Sun Chun-Hao, Xu Jian-Hua, Xu. Nomogram for predicting chylous ascites after right colectomy.  World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;13(11):1361-71.

  25. Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kang DW, et al. Clinical benefits and oncologic equivalence of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:153–8. 2016/05/20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Q, Du L, Lu L, et al. Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative period of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendoscopic Advanced Surg Techn Part A. 2019;29:178–83. 2019/01/08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adam MA, Lee LM, Kim J, et al. Alvimopan provides additional improvement in outcomes and cost savings in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;264:141–6. 2015/10/27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. La Regina D, Di Giuseppe M, Lucchelli M, et al. Financial impact of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:580–6. 2018/09/15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khrucharoen U, Juo YY, Wongpongsalee T, et al. Risk factors for readmission for early small bowel obstruction following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an MBSAQIP analysis. Surg Obes Related Dis. 2021;17:1041–8. 2021/05/10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayashi S, Fujii M, Takayama T. Prevention of postoperative small bowel obstruction in gastric cancer. Surgery Today. 2015;45:1352–9. 2014/12/30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tabata T, Kihira T, Shiozaki T, et al. Efficacy of a sodium hyaluronate-carboxycellulose membrane (seprafilm) for reducing the risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:188–93. 2010/02/05.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:Cd005080. 2009/01/23.

  33. Barbieux J, Hamy A, Talbot MF, et al. Does enhanced recovery reduce postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery? J Visc Surg. 2017;154:79–85. 2016/09/13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anania G, et al. Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Techn Coloproctol. 2021;25(10):1099–113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by malignant Tumor Clinical Medicine Research Center, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, China (2020N090s).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Z-HD collected the clinical data. Z-HD, L-YR, and C-ZZ designed the study and supervised the statistical data. Z-HD and S-YF contributed to the analyses. X- JH provided clinical advice, reviewed the manuscript, and gave final approval of the version of the article to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhua Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital. Informed consent individual patients were waived because of the retrospective nature of the analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In this article, Figure 1 was not updated as per correction and that Table 1 corrections were incorrectly carried out.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, H., Liu, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Novel nomogram for predicting risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after right colectomy for cancer. World J Surg Onc 20, 19 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Nomogram
  • Right colectomy
  • Early postoperative small bowel obstruction
  • Risk factors