Skip to main content

Sternocleidomastoid flap for pedicled reconstruction in head & neck surgery- revisiting the anatomy and technique

Abstract

Background

Previous studies on sternocleidomastoid flaps, have defined the importance of preserving sternocleidomastoid (SCM) branch of superior thyroid artery (STA). This theory drew criticism, as this muscle is known to be a type II muscle, i.e., the muscle has one dominant pedicle (branches from the occipital artery at the superior pole) and smaller vascular pedicles entering the belly of muscle (branches from STA and thyrocervical trunk) at the middle and lower pole respectively. It was unlikely for the SCM branch of STA to supply the upper and lower thirds of the muscle. We undertook a cadaveric angiographic study to investigate distribution of STA supply to SCM muscle.

Methods

It is a cross-sectional descriptive study on 10 cadaveric SCM muscles along with ipsilateral STA which were evaluated with angiography using diatrizoate (urograffin) dye. Radiographic films were interpreted looking at the opacification of the muscle. Results were analyzed using frequency distribution and percentage.

Results

Out of ten specimens, near complete opacification was observed in eight SCM muscle specimens. While one showed poor uptake in the lower third of the muscle, the other showed poor uptake in the upper third segment of muscle.

Conclusion

Based on the above findings we suggest to further investigate sternocleidomastoid muscle as a type III flap, as the STA branch also supplies the whole muscle along with previously described pedicle from occipital artery. However, this needs to be further corroborated intra-operatively using scanning laser doppler. This also explains better survival rates of superior thyroid artery based sternomastoid flaps.

Introduction

Guidelines recommend microsurgical free flap reconstruction as a primary reconstructive option for most defects of head and neck surgery [1, 2]. The use of free flaps is based on the tenet of importing large volumes of healthy tissue from sites distant from radiotherapy and surgical fields. Free radial forearm and free anterolateral thigh flap are the most commonly used microvascular flaps for the soft tissue cover [1]. The only downside being the donor site morbidity [1]. However, this does not reduce the importance of learning the techniques of pedicled flaps for a head and neck surgeon. When the situation demands or when means and expertise are not available, the surgeons have to fall back on pedicled flaps. One such flap is the pedicled sternocleidomastoid (SCM) myocutaneous flap.

Conventionally, the SCM flap has been described as a type II flap by Mathes and Nahai [3] (Table 1), i.e. the muscle has one dominant pedicle (branches from the occipital artery at the superior pole) and smaller vascular pedicles entering the belly of muscle (branches from superior thyroid artery (STA) and thyrocervical trunk) at the middle and lower pole, respectively.

Table 1 Patterns of muscle circulation as described by Mathes & Nahai

The SCM flap is used to reconstruct defects of cheek, floor of mouth [4,5,6], mandible [7] and defects after parotidectomy [8,9,10]. It is also used to reconstruct oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal wall [11,12,13,14], laryngotracheal complex [15,16,17,18], close pharyngocutaneous and cervical oesophagus fistula [19,20,21,22].

This flap is usually not the preferred choice of most surgeons because of it’s proximity to internal jugular lymph nodes, risk of damage to blood supply during neck dissection and ill-effects of radiotherapy on flap viability [20, 23]. Total or partial flap loss has been reported in 10-30% of the cases [24]. However, flap loss may be minimized by modifying the technique to preserve the branch from superior thyroid artery (STA), as shown in our own series of 32 patients, resulting in flap loss of 6.25% [25]. The branch from STA is preserved, firstly by identifying the branch arising from the STA and then dissecting distal to its take off from STA, close to the thyroid gland and if required ligating the STA on the thyroid gland in order to provide the desired length to the flap.

As classically described, if the SCM muscle is a Type II muscle (i.e., having one major and two segmental minor pedicles) then technically, preserving the STA branch should not improve flap results. This was the criticism our previous series received. Hence, we decided to test the hypothesis that the STA pedicle alone would offer adequate perfusion of the muscle, in the absence of perfusion by the posterior occipital artery.

With the above background, we decided to re-visit the arterial anatomy of this flap with the help of cadaveric angiography to test the hypothesis.

Cadaveric angiography is a known technique to study the arterial anatomy of muscles and has been used previously by various other authors [26, 27]. We chose to test our hypothesis using the cadaveric angiography because in a cadaver it was possible to study only the perfusion of the SCM branch of STA. This would be not be possible by conventional angiography as the perfusion from other pedicles (posterior occipital and branches from transverse cervical artery) would confound the results.

Methods

The study was conducted at the Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study where angiographic examination of the SCM muscle was performed on dissected specimens from cadavers to evaluate its blood supply. All the cadavers used were fresh i.e., with 5 hours of death. The neck was dissected immediately and the sternomastoid muscle with the carotid artery were taken out as a unit and the angiographic study was performed ex-vivo. 10 specimens were dissected out from 5 cadavers, i.e., both right sided and left sided specimens. In the specimen, we included (Fig. 1):

  1. i.

    The common carotid artery (CCA) and its bifurcation into the external and internal carotid arteries (ECA & ICA).

  2. ii.

    The STA, along with its origin from the external carotid artery.

  3. iii.

    The SCM of the same side, keeping its pedicles from STA intact.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Specimen of SCM muscle with its blood supply. Infant feeding tube can be seen in common carotid artery. Internal carotid artery and external carotid artery distal to STA is ligated. STA distal to SCM branch is also ligated. (A: Clavicular head of sternocleidomastoid, B: Sternal head of sternocleidomastoid, C: Common carotid artery, D: External carotid artery, E: Internal carotid artery, F: Superior thyroid artery, G: Thyroid branch of superior thyroid artery, H: Sternomastoid branch of superior thyroid artery), I: Fibrofatty tissue of the neck

After placing an infant feeding tube into the common carotid artery, lumen of the all the vessels was flushed with normal saline until no more clots were seen. After removing the clots vessels were ligated at three different sites:

  1. i.

    At the proximal end of the common carotid artery.

  2. ii.

    At the distal end, both on the external and internal carotid arteries.

  3. iii.

    At the distal end of the STA, after the branch to SCM.

Angiography was done immediately after the dissection was completed and the specimen was prepared as described above.

A 20 milliliters (ml) suitable contrast material, 76% diatrizoate (Urograffin) was injected as a bolus push, using a 20 ml syringe through the infant feeding tube from the proximal end. After 5 minutes, keeping it in anatomical position i.e., position of the muscle with its blood supply as it is in the human body, a radiograph of the specimen was obtained. Radiograph was taken using x- rays at 50 kV and 20 mAs. Only outcome measure studied was the pattern of muscle perfusion.

Radiographic films were interpreted looking at the opacification of the muscle. A radiolucent hue was considered as perfusion of the muscle segment.

Atherosclerosis if present usually affects the bifurcation of wider arteries i.e., CCA bifurcating into ECA and ICA. The branching of STA from ECA is usually not the site of atherosclerotic plaques [28].

Data was analyzed using frequency distribution and percentage using Microsoft Excel. Institutional ethics committee approval was obtained before starting the study.

Results

Out of ten specimens, we saw near complete opacification of eight SCM muscle specimens (Fig. 2). One specimen showed poor uptake in the lower third of the muscle, and another showed poor uptake in the upper third segment of muscle (Figs. 3 and 4)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Angiographic film showing complete opacification of the muscle

Fig. 3
figure 3

Angiographic film showing un-opacified lower third. Yellow cross indicates the un-opacified region

Fig. 4
figure 4

Angiographic film showing un-opacified upper third. Yellow cross indicates the un-opacified region

All eight specimens wherein the whole muscle was opacified, showed uniform uptake in all the three segments of the muscle.

Discussion

Based on the above findings, it seems that the SCM perfusion resembles that of a type III muscle, than of type II, as described previously in literature [3]. A type III flap has two dominant pedicles. According to the findings in this study, the STA is the second dominant pedicle supplying the SCM flap, other than its already established supply from the occipital artery (which serves as its first dominant pedicle). Our findings might imply, that STA, not only augments the blood supply of the muscle (via occipital artery) but, is also capable of solely supplying the whole muscle in 80% of cases. STA supplied two-thirds of the muscle, including the lower third of the muscle, in 90% cases. In our previous series, we reported a flap loss of 6.25 % [25], by preserving the SCM branch of STA, as opposed to the historical 10-30%, reported in the literature [24]. These clinical results are reinforced by our present angiographic study. In situations, where more length of the flap is required, the STA was ligated distal to the SCM branch [25]. Tiwari et al have described in their series of 18 successful cases of SCM flaps, of which 3 flaps were done for temporal bone resection defects [22]. In these 3, they detached the muscle from the temporal bone, and none of the muscular branches of occipital artery were preserved. The flap survived solely on the SCM branch from STA, as well as collateral circulation from the branches of occipital and posterior auricular arteries supplying the overlying skin. Wei et al., in their series of 65 patients, emphasized on preserving the SCM branch of STA. They reported partial flap loss of 8 % and did not report any total flap loss [29]. Similarly, Khazaeni in their lone case [30], reported sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap, for a full thickness cheek defect solely based on the SCM branch of STA, as the occipital branch was ligated during the lymph-node dissection in the same case. Jones et al. [24] in their systematic review have described decrease in the complications of the SCM flap from about 60 % [12] in 1980s to present rate of about 2% (2016) [31]. In their review, they attributed lower complication rates to: 1) suturing skin paddle to underlying muscle so that the perforators can be safeguarded from shearing, while handling the flap 2) to check the skin refill before suturing the flap to the defect 3) preservation of SCM branch of superior thyroid artery.

Hu et al dissected 50 cadaveric muscle specimens (without angiography), described a branch of STA, that runs down to the clavicle and supplies perforators to perfuse the lower third segment of the muscle. They also stressed on the importance of STA in supplying the lower third of the muscle [32].

The relatively higher loss of the flap in various series may be due to poor underlying perforators to the overlying skin in which case, there is only a partial loss of the skin paddle while the underlying muscle remains healthy. This has been discussed in detail by Jabaley et al. where they studied the blood supply of sternocleidomastoid in 3 ways: cadaveric dissection, neck dissections and fluorescein dye testing, after the flaps were raised. They concluded that due to paucity of perforators from the muscle to skin or very narrow caliber capillaries traversing from muscle to overlying skin, there is a greater chance of skin-paddle loss that would eventually heal by re-epithelization with healthy underlying muscle [33]. Another proposed reason for higher flap loss is disrupted venous drainage. As most of the discussions revolve around arterial anatomy of the muscle, venous drainage is often overlooked. SCM is drained by accompanying venous tributaries with each vascular pedicle and additionally by small tributaries to external and anterior jugular vein [34]. Every effort should be made to preserve maximum venous tributaries to prevent congestion of the flap.

The limitation of our study is a relatively small sample size, that may obviate anatomic variations in the blood supply and this requires larger numbers to be studied. Another drawback is the unaccounted entity of “feeding-vessel” spasm, a phenomenon which may get aggravated by flap-handling [35,36,37]. In real time surgery, there is always a chance of feeding vessels or perforators ‘going into spasm’ despite rich supply through intramuscular communications. As with all cadaveric studies, it was not possible to study this and it may very well be a cause of flap failure despite angiographic uptake in the lower third of the muscle.

Conclusion

Our findings hint towards possibility of type III like distribution of blood vessels in the SCM muscle instead of type II. We suggest to further investigate SCM muscle’s blood supply using larger number of subjects. This should be further corroborated with intra-operative scanning laser doppler after occluding occipital artery.

We also strongly recommend to preserve STA branch to the SCM along with the occipital artery for better perfusion of lower third of the flap, hence minimizing rates of flap loss and flap-related morbidity.

Availability of data and materials

On Request

References

  1. Ragbir M, Brown JS, Mehanna H. Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(Suppl 2):S191–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joo Y-H, Cho J-K, Koo BS, Kwon M, Kwon S, Kwon S, et al. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;2:12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(2):177–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ariyan S. One-stage reconstruction for defects of the mouth using a sternomastoid myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(5):618–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marx RE, McDonald DK. The sternocleidomastoid muscle as a muscular or myocutaneous flap for oral and facial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43(3):155–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yugueros P, Woods JE. The sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap: a reappraisal. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(2):93–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conley J, Gullane PJ. The sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. Head Neck Surg. 1980;2(4):308–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bugis SP, Young JE, Archibald SD. Sternocleidomastoid flap following parotidectomy. Head Neck. 1990;12(5):430–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jost G, Guenon P, Gentil S. Parotidectomy: a plastic approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23(1):1–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kornblut AD, Westphal P, Miehlke A. The effectiveness of a sternomastoid muscle flap in preventing post-parotidectomy occurrence of the Frey syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1974;77(5):368–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ariyan S. The sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap. Laryngoscope. 1980;90(4):676–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki CT. The Sternocleidomastoid Myocutaneous Flap. Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106(2):74–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Charles GA, Hamaker RC, Singer MI. Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(8 Pt 1):970–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alvarez GE, Escamilla JT, Carranza A. The split sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1983;36(2):183–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eliachar I, Moscona AR. Reconstruction of the laryngotracheal complex in children using the sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap. Head Neck Surg. 1981;4(1):16–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tovi F, Gittot A. Sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap for the repair of laryngeal and tracheal wall defects. Head Neck Surg. 1983;5(5):447–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman M, Grybauskas V, Toriumi DM, Kaplan A, Seiden A. Reconstruction of the subglottic larynx with a myoperiosteal flap: clinical and experimental study. Head Neck Surg. 1986;8(4):287–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman M, Toriumi DM, Owens R, Grybauskas VT. Experience with the sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap for reconstruction of subglottic and tracheal defects: modification of technique and report of long-term results. Laryngoscope. 1988;98(9):1003–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin JS. Sternocleidomastoid myoplasty for the repair of chronic cervical esophageal fistulae. The Laryngoscope. 1986;96(8):834–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Larson DL, Goepfert H. Limitations of the sternocleidomastoid musculocutaneous flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70(3):328–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman M, Toriumi DM, Strorigl T, Chilis T, Skolnik E. The sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap for esophagopharyngeal reconstruction and fistula repair: clinical and experimental study. Laryngoscope. 1988;98(10):1084–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiwari R. Experiences with the sternocleidomastoid muscle and myocutaneous flaps. J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104(4):315–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alvi A, Stegnjajic A. Sternocleidomastoid myofascial flap for head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 1994;16(4):326–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones LF, Farrar EM, Roberts DJH, Moor JW. Revisiting the sternocleidomastoid flap as a reconstructive option in head and neck surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133(9):742–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar V, Gaud U, Shukla M, Pandey M. Sternocleidomastoid island flap preserving the branch from superior thyroid artery for the reconstruction following resection of oral cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol EJSO. 2009;35(9):1011–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Turkoglu E, Seckin H, Gurer B, Ahmed A, Uluc K, Pulfer K, et al. The cadaveric perfusion and angiography as a teaching tool: imaging the intracranial vasculature in cadavers. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2014;75(6):435–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fróes LB, Tolosa EMCD, Camargo RD, Pompeu E, Liberti EA. Radiographic aspects and angioarchitectural arrangements in corrosion casts of the blood supply to the human sternocleidomastoid muscle by the sternocleidomastoid branch of the occipital artery. Rev Hosp Clínicas. 1999;54:127–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh R, Tubbs RS. Histological verification of atherosclerosis due to bends and bifurcations in carotid arteries predicted by hemodynamic model. J Vasc Bras. 2018;17(4):280–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei D, Liu J, Zhao W, Zhu H, Li Z, Wang H. Use of the versatile sternocleidomastoid flap in oral and maxillofacial surgery: our experience. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):742–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khazaeni K, Rajati M, Shahabi A, Mashhadi L. Use of a sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap based on the sternocleidomastoid branch of the superior thyroid artery to reconstruct extensive cheek defects. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(6):1167–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellabban MA. The Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Flap: A Versatile Local Method for Repair of External Penetrating Injuries of Hypopharyngeal-Cervical Esophageal Funnel. World J Surg. 2016;40(4):870–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu KS, Song WC, Kim SH, Choi SW, Han SH, Paik DJ, et al. Branching patterns of the arterial branches supplying the middle vascular pedicle of the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a topographic anatomical study with surgical applications for the use of pedicles osteomuscular flaps. Surg Radiol Anat SRA. 2006;28(1):7–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jabaley ME, Heckler FR, Wallace WH, Knott LH. Sternocleidomastoid regional flaps: a new look at an old concept. Br J Plast Surg. 1979;32(2):106–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bordoni B, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Sternocleidomastoid Muscle. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2021. [cited 2021 Oct 26]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532881/.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barron JN, Emmett AJJ. Subcutaneous pedicle flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1965;18:51–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonde CT, Holstein-Rathlou N-H, Elberg JJ. Blood flow autoregulation in pedicled flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2009;62(12):1671–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Arnold PB, Merritt W, Rodeheaver GT, Campbell CA, Morgan RF, Drake DB. Effects of perivascular Botulinum Toxin-A application on vascular smooth muscle and flap viability in the rat. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(5):463–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous individuals who selflessly donated their bodies for research and academic learning.

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS- Anatomical dissection and performance of procedure, TK- Preparation of manuscript and review of literature, SKP- Anatomical part of the study and concept, RCS- Radiological interpretation, MP- Overall concept of the study, manuscript preparation and editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarun Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Taken from the institutional ethics committee before starting the study- DEAN 2008-09/169

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Competing interests

None

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, A., Kumar, T., Pandey, S.K. et al. Sternocleidomastoid flap for pedicled reconstruction in head & neck surgery- revisiting the anatomy and technique. World J Surg Onc 19, 349 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02470-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02470-5

Keywords

  • Sternocleidomastoid
  • flap
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Reconstruction
  • Cadaver
  • Angiography
  • Superior Thyroid Artery