Skip to main content
Download PDF

Laparoscopic intragastric resection of gastric synovial sarcoma: report of the first ever case with video demonstration

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 19, Article number: 65 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare soft tissue tumor. Among different anatomical locations where it can be found, gastric localization is a very uncommon one. Based on soft tissue sarcoma guidelines, complete tumor excision is considered the main treatment approach. Depending on size and localization of the tumor, both wedge and major gastric resections have been performed in the past for the treatment of this condition.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 43-year-old woman who underwent a laparoscopic intragastric excision of a gastric 10-mm SS located nearby the esophagogastric junction. Pathology examination confirmed the presence of a SS. The resected specimen confirmed margin-free excision of a monophasic spindle cell neoplasm invading the submucosa and presenting the rearrangement of SS18 gene at fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). No adjuvant treatment was offered, and 18 months after surgery, the patient was alive and disease free.

Conclusions

This represents the first case reported in literature of a laparoscopic intragastric resection for a gastric SS. This approach allowed to obtain a full thickness radical tumor resection with the advantages of minimally invasive and organ preserving surgery.

Background

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare malignant tumor derived from mesenchymal tissue and has an incidence of 8 to 10% among all soft tissue sarcomas [1]. Even though it is called “synovial,” its real origin is still unknown as there are no evidences of direct differentiation from synovial tissue.

It occurs primarily in the extremities of arms and legs, often in proximity to joint capsules and tendon sheaths, but it has been rarely observed in the head and neck region, mediastinum, blood vessels, heart, liver, and in gastrointestinal tract [2,3,4,5,6,7,8].

When located in the gastrointestinal tract, it can be easily mistaken for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). What sets these two entities apart is the presence of an SSX-SS18 chromosome translocation [9].

Interestingly, only 40 cases of SS have been reported to have a gastric location [10]. As per virtually all soft tissue tumors, surgical resection with negative margins represents the mainstay of therapy [11, 12]. Major gastric resections as well as wedge or tumor resections, mainly by open surgery, have been performed in the past depending on the size and location of the tumor [10, 13].

We present the first case of laparoscopic intragastric surgery for the treatment of a gastric SS.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old woman was referred to our Tertiary Care Center for a submucosal ulcerated lesion of the upper third of the stomach. Her past medical history was unremarkable, with the exception of a 1-year history of epigastric pain and dyspepsia which failed to improve on standard PPI treatment. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) showed atrophic gastritis with multiple amartomatous polyps and a 10-mm submucosal round-shaped lesion with central ulceration located in the upper third of the stomach in proximity of the esophagogastric junction (Fig. 1a). Multiple biopsies with immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed a rearrangement of SS18 gene, indicative for synovial sarcoma.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy. b PET-CT scan showing a single gastric uptake (red arrow). c Preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy with clip positioning

Full size image

Preoperative staging work-up was completed via chest-abdomen computed tomography (CT) which failed to identify the lesion and a fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET/TC) which demonstrated the presence of a single metabolically active mass in the upper third of the stomach (Fig. 1b).

Given size and location of the tumor near the cardial region, a laparoscopic intragastric approach was used. This approach was employed also based on the fact that no formal lymphadenectomy was deemed necessary. The day before surgery, a further endoscopic evaluation with clip tumor marking was carried out to facilitate intraoperative tumor identification (Fig. 1c).

The patient was placed on the operating table in the supine position with parted legs, 20° reverse Trendelenburg, and slight left-side tilt. A 5-mm camera was used. A 5-mm trocar was placed at the umbilicus, and further, two 5-mm balloon trocars and one 12 balloon trocar were placed in the mid-left upper quadrants of the abdomen considering the position of gastric body in relation to the abdominal wall (Fig. 2). This multiport approach allowed us to perform a full abdominal cavity exploration, an accurate intragastric port placement, the use of an endoscopic linear stapler for a complete full thickness tumor resection, and an easy and safe closure of gastrotomies (Video).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Trocar positioning

Full size image

Additional file 1. Supplemental Digital Content 1.

Postoperative course was uneventful. Soft diet was resumed on postoperative day 1, and patient was discharge on postoperative day 3.

Histopathology examination confirmed the presence of a monophasic spindle cell neoplasm. Four out of ten mitoses on high magnification field was shown, no necrosis was present, and lympho-vascular invasion was seen. The tumor involved the submucosa. Circumferential and deep margins were tumor free. Fluorescence in situ hybridization established the rearrangement of SS18 gene confirming the diagnosis of SS (Fig. 3a, b, c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Surgical specimen. b Hematoxylin eosin strain showing the whole section of the resected tumor. c FISH analysis showing SS18 gene rearrangement

Full size image

No adjuvant treatment was offered, and 18 months after surgery, the patient is alive and disease free.

Discussion

Primary gastric SS is an exceptionally rare disease. The first case was described in 2000, and 40 cases have been reported since [9, 10].

At endoscopic examination, gastric SS resembles a GIST tumor, though diagnosis should be suspected when a white submucosal plaque-like lesion with central depression is observed [9, 14].

On hematoxylin and eosin staining, histology demonstrates a similar pattern or mono or biphasic spindle cell in both SS and GIST tumors. On immunohistochemistry, however, c-kit positivity is lacking in gastric SS, and the fusion products of the SS18 gene combined to either SSX1, SSX2, or SSX4 gene are found [15]. Three histological variants of SS have been described: (1) monophasic, (2) biphasic, and (3) a “poorly differentiated” subtype. The monophasic and biphasic subtypes represent the 89% and 8% of the cases, respectively. The “poorly differentiated” subtype has been observed only in one case [10, 13, 15, 16].

With regard to treatment, no definite guidelines are available for gastrointestinal SS. Based on NCCN and ESMO guidelines for soft tissue sarcomas, complete tumor resection is considered the main goal of surgery and no lymphadenectomy is indicated [11, 12].

In previous series, different surgical approaches have been described in 29 cases: a major gastric resection was performed in 16 cases, and a wedge or tumor resection was carried out in 13 cases [9, 10, 13,14,15, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. A laparoscopic approach was employed in 7 cases [13, 18, 23,24,25,26,27].

In our case, despite the small size of the lesion, a proximal or total gastrectomy would have been required to achieve tumor clearance due to its location nearby the esophagogastric junction. The choice of a laparoscopic intragastric approach allowed us to perform a complete tumor resection within the objective of organ preservation. This approach has been successfully performed in GISTs as well as other tumors located on the posterior wall of the upper third of the stomach when no lymphadenectomy is required [28, 29]. This approach provides minimal patient discomfort in the early postoperative course and avoids post-gastrectomy short- and long-term complications.

Conclusions

This is the first case reported in literature of laparoscopic intragastric resection for a synovial sarcoma of the stomach. This approach allowed to obtain a full thickness complete resection of the tumor with the preservation of the stomach, hence combining the advantages of minimally invasive and organ-preserving surgery.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Jo VY, Fletcher CD. WHO classification of soft tissue tumors: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology. 2014;46(2):95–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roth JA, Enzinger FM, Tannenbaum M. Synovial sarcoma of the neck: a follow up study of 24 cases. Cancer. 1975;35(4):1243–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Witkin GB, Miettinen M, Rosai J. A biphasic tumor of the mediastinum with features of synovial sarcoma. A report of four cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(6):490–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw GR, Lais CJ. Fatal intravascular synovial sarcoma in a 31-year-old woman. Hum Pathol. 1993;24(7):809–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hazelbag HM, Szuhai K, Tanke HJ, et al. Primary synovial sarcoma of the heart: a cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis combining RT-PCR and COBRA-FISH of a case with a complex karyotype. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(11):1434–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fetsch JF, Meis JM. Synovial sarcoma of the abdominal wall. Cancer. 1993;72(2):469–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amr SS, Shihabi NK, Al HH. Synovial sarcoma of the esophagus. Am J Otolaryngol. 1984;5(4):266–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Srivastava A, Nielsen PG, Dal Cin P, et al. Monophasic synovial sarcoma of the liver. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(8):1047–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Billings SD, Meisner LF, Cummings OW, et al. Synovial sarcoma of the upper digestive tract: a report of two cases with demonstration of the X;18 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(1):68–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchand Crety C, Bellefqih S, Amroun K, et al. Primary gastric synovial sarcoma: a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;78:270–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2018). Soft tissue sarcoma (version 2.2018). Retrieved from https://jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/16/5/article-p536.xml

  12. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, et al. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv268–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong H, Law S, Collins R. Gastric synovial sarcoma: a case report and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2020;26:142–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Makhlouf HR, Ahrens W, Agarwal B, et al. Synovial sarcoma of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):275–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Romeo S, Rossi S, Acosta Marín M, et al. Primary synovial sarcoma (SS) of the digestives: a molecular and clinicopathological study of fifteen cases. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2015;12(2):5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Folpe AL, Schmidt RA, Chapman D, et al. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma: immunohistochemical distinction from primitive neuroectodermal tumors and high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22(6):673–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang CC, Wu MC, Lin MT, et al. Primary gastric synovial sarcoma. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012;111(9):516–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinniah RP, Roche E, Cameron D. GI synovial sarcomas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2012;3(4):e11.

  19. Sahara S, Otsuki Y, Egawa Y, et al. Primary synovial sarcoma of the stomach--a case report and review of the literature. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209(11):745–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamata K, Wada R, Yajima N, Sawada M, Wakasa H, Yagihashi S. Primary gastric synovial sarcoma: molecular diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. Clin J Gastreoenterol. 2013;6(4):303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Torres Rivas HE, Fernández S, Fresno MF. Primary gastric synovial sarcoma. Pathology. 2014;46(3):253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong NACS, Campbell F, Shepherd NA. Abdominal monophasic synovial sarcoma is a morphological and immunohistochemical mimic of gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Histopathology. 2015;66(10):974–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. So IT, Cho KB, Lee JY, et al. A primary gastric synovial sarcoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e8904.

  24. Hu S, Wong K, Ramesh KH, Villanueva-Siles E, Panarelli N, In H. Diffuse, aggressive metastatic progression after minimally invasive local resection of primary gastric synovial sarcoma: a case report and systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Canc. 2019;50(6):116–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Olsen G, Beal EW, Pfeil S, et al. Primary gastric synovial sarcoma mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): gastric synovial sarcoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(8):1450–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuente I, Bruballa R, Corradetti S, et al. Gastric synovial sarcoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(7):1515–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ogino S, Konishi H, Ichikawa D, Hamada J, Shoda K, Arita T, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Okamoto K, Yamazaki S, Yasukawa S, Konishi E, Otsuji E. Detection of fusion gene in cell-free DNA of a gastric synovial sarcoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(8):949–56.

  28. Conrad C, Nedelcu M, Ogiso S, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Gayet B. Laparoscopic intragastric surgery for early gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;8:2620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedrazzani C, Vitali M, Guglielmi A. A case of unexpected gastric mass. JAMA Surg. 2015;15(12):1187–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Previous publications and presentations

The authors declare that this report has not been published elsewhere and that it is not been submitted previously for publication elsewhere.

Funding

The authors declare no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Verona University, Verona, Italy

    Matteo Rivelli, Cristian Conti & Corrado Pedrazzani

  2. Division of Minimally Invasive, General and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Eduardo Fernandes

  3. Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University and Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

    Laura Bernardoni

  4. Pathological Anatomy Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Verona University and Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

    Sara Pecori

  5. Oncology Section, Department of Oncology, Verona University and Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

    Sara Cingarlini

  6. Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospital “G.B. Rossi”, Piazzale “L. Scuro” 10, 37134, Verona, Italy

    Corrado Pedrazzani

Authors
  1. Matteo Rivelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristian Conti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Bernardoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sara Pecori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sara Cingarlini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Corrado Pedrazzani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors declare to have agreed both to be personally accountable for author’s own contributions and to ensure that question related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even once in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and resolution documented in the literature. Design: Rivelli M, Fernandes E, Pedrazzani C. Acquisition of data: Rivelli M, Bernardoni L, Pecori S, Cingarlini S. Drafting of the manuscript: Rivelli M, Fernandes E, Conti C, Pedrazzani C. Critical revision of manuscript: Bernardoni L, Pecori S, Cingarlini S, Conti C, Pedrazzani C. Final approval: Rivelli M, Fernandes E, Conti C, Bernardoni S, Pecori S, Cingarlini S, Pedrazzani C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrado Pedrazzani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for case reports deemed not to constitute research at your institution. The authors declare that the patient has given written consent for data and image collection.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that the patient has given written consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivelli, M., Fernandes, E., Conti, C. et al. Laparoscopic intragastric resection of gastric synovial sarcoma: report of the first ever case with video demonstration. World J Surg Onc 19, 65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02172-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02172-y

Keywords

  • Synovial sarcoma
  • Gastric sarcoma
  • Laparoscopy
  • Intragastric resection
  • Organ-preserving surgery

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us