Skip to main content
Download PDF

Head and neck cutaneous melanoma: 5-year survival analysis in a Serbian university center

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 18, Article number: 312 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Head and neck melanoma (HNM) is specific from the anatomical and etiopathogenetic aspects. In addition to morphopathological parameters, rich vascularization and lymphatic drainage of the head and neck affect the occurrence of lymphogenic and hematogenous metastases, as well as the metastases on both sides of the neck.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study included cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent surgery at a clinical center over a 10-year period. The clinical follow-up was at least 60 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the survival analysis. The predictor effect of certain independent variables on a given dichotomous dependent variable (survival) was measured by the Cox regression analysis.

Results

The analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics of 116 patients with HNM revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in age and gender in the total sample. Thirty-three (28.45%) patients were already in stage III or IV of the disease at the first examination, which affected the overall survival rate. The overall 5-year survival was 30.2%. No statistically significant difference in 5-year survival was found in relation to age and location. The period without melanoma progression decreased progressively in the advanced stage. Forty-nine patients (42%) underwent surgery for lymphogenic metastases in the parotid region and/or neck during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Patients with HNM included in this study frequently presented an advanced stage of the disease at the first examination, which is reflected in a low rate of 5-year survival. Early diagnosis and adequate primary treatment can ensure longer survival.

Background

Melanoma is one of the most malignant tumors in human population and the most malignant skin tumor. The incidence of melanoma varies around the world, and it has been steadily rising in recent decades. An increase of up to 200% over the last 20 years has been reported [1]. The increase in incidence is higher in males than in females [2].

Head and neck melanoma is specific in two aspects: anatomical and etiopathogenetic. In addition to local infiltration, which is assessed on the basis of a number of parameters (tumor thickness, number of mitoses, lymphovascular invasion, satellitosis), rich vascularization and lymphatic drainage of the head and neck affect the occurrence of lymphogenic and hematogenous metastases, as well as metastases on both sides of the neck in melanoma near the sagittal plane. The main prognostic factor is the thickness of the tumor. With the increase in the thickness of the tumor, the risk of developing lymphogenic metastases increases [3]. Metastases in the lymph nodes of the neck and parotid region, as well as lymph nodes in the occipital region for melanoma in the occipital region, are typical. The distribution of melanoma localization is as follows: face (52%), scalp (19%), neck (17%), ear (9%), and mucosal lesions (3%) [4]. The clinical course also depends on the localization of the primary tumor; therefore, the localization on the earlobe and scalp is mentioned as a risk factor for an aggressive clinical course. For head and neck melanoma, males are associated with a worse prognosis, while melanoma on the face mainly does not cause metastases [5, 6]. The etiology of head and neck melanoma is related to the exposure to UV radiation as an important factor. The head and neck area accounts for 9% of body surface area, while the prevalence of melanoma of these regions is higher [5, 6].

The median age at diagnosis was about 60 years, but a quarter of patients were younger than 45 [7]. Early diagnosis and adherence to established treatment guidelines significantly affect survival in these patients [8].

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) assigns the following important factors: tumor thickness and ulceration for T category, the number of lymph nodes with micro or macro metastases, satellite infiltrations or in transit metastases for N category, and the presence of distant metastases and/or elevated plasma LDH levels for M category [9, 10].

Surgical treatment is the gold standard for treating cutaneous melanoma. Treatment of melanoma begins with an excisional biopsy. After the diagnosis is confirmed, the stage of the disease is determined. Then, a wide excision of the tumor is applied. Surgical margins of healthy tissue are defined as follows: for in situ melanoma 5 mm, for melanoma up to 1 mm it is 1 cm, and for the rest, the margin is 2 cm in the healthy tissue [11, 12]. The use of sentinel node biopsy is controversial. According to reports, it is performed in only 5–7% of all head and neck melanomas, and some studies show no difference in survival with or without sentinel biopsy [13,14,15,16]. Therapeutic dissections are performed when lymph node enlargement is clinically and radiologically confirmed. Dissection can be classified as radical neck dissection, modified radical neck dissection, or extended neck dissection. When clinically indicated, parotidectomy is performed in the form of a superficial parotidectomy, for melanoma in the parotid masseteric region and in front of a vertical line passing through the external auditory canal. In melanomas located in front of a vertical line passing through the external auditory canal, a dissection of the I–IV group of neck nodes is performed. For melanoma behind the vertical line through the external auditory canal, a posterolateral dissection is performed, which includes group V of the neck nodes and postauricular and suboccipital nodes [17]. In clinically positive metastases in the parotid region, some authors suggest elective neck dissection because they found the existence of occult metastases in 38% of patients [18].

Five-year survival for scalp and neck cutaneous melanoma has been on the rise recently (93.9% cases have been reported). However, in positive lymph nodes, survival is up to 83.1%, which is lower than in other anatomical regions. In relation to tumor thickness, for T1 disease-specific, 5-year survival (5-year DS) is 96.7% and for T4 it is 62.3% [19, 20].

The aim of this paper is to analyze the incidence of head and neck melanoma in the total population of cutaneous melanoma and determine the prognostic significance of gender, age, localization, and disease stage at a 5-year survival rate. The period without disease progression and the type of surgery during the follow-up are also shown.

Methods

The retrospective cross-sectional study includes patients with cutaneous melanoma over a 10-year period who underwent surgery at a university clinical center in Niš, Serbia. Patients with melanoma of the head and neck were selected from the medical reports. Demographic characteristics (gender, age), localization of melanoma, and TNM classification according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (TNM classifications for cutaneous melanoma, eighth edition) [9] were analyzed. The stage of the disease was defined during conciliar examination, and all patients were clinically monitored at the oncology advisory board for at least 60 months. It was determined whether lymphogenic or hematogenous metastases and melanoma-specific mortality occurred.

The study procedures were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approvals of the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Niš.

Statistical analysis

The following statistical parameters are presented by descriptive statistical analysis: arithmetic mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, absolute frequency (n), and structure index (%). The comparison of the frequency of occurrence of individual modalities of attribute features between groups was performed by Pearson χ2 test/Fisher exact test. The comparison of the mean values of the numerical features between the two independent groups of respondents was performed by Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test. To measure the correlation of certain traits, a Pearson correlation analysis was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The predictor effect of certain independent variables on a given dichotomous dependent variable (survival) was measured by Cox regression analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS program version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The threshold for statistical significance was the level of statistical error less than 5% (p < 0.05). The results of the statistical analysis are presented in tables and graphs.

Results

In the period from 2005 to 2015, a total of 774 patients with cutaneous melanoma were registered at the oncology advisory board of the University Clinical Center of Niš (Serbia), and 116 of them were diagnosed with head and neck cutaneous melanoma (14.99%). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with head and neck melanoma are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients
Full size table

The Student t test shows that there was no statistically significant difference in age and gender in the total sample (p = 0.9). Melanoma was most often diagnosed in persons aged 50 to 80 years. The most common localization was on the face. Unfortunately, a significantly large number had an advanced stage of the disease with already present lymphogenic and/or hematogenous metastases at the first examination (stages III and IV were diagnosed in 33 patients) (Table 1).

The distribution of the location in relation to gender differs significantly for tumors on the face and scalp. Namely, 40% of all melanomas in males is on the scalp, while 55% of melanomas in females is on the face (Pearson χ2 = 13.102, p = 0.004).

The overall 5-year survival is 30.2% (Table 2). It is statistically significantly higher in females (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.020). In our sample, female patients lived on average 9 months longer than male patients.

Table 2 Five-year survival by gender in total
Full size table

There is no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival in relation to age (T test, p = 0.204) and localization (χ2 test, p = 0.323), but survival is significantly shorter if lymphogenic or hematogenous metastases (stages III and IV) were reported at the first surgeon’s examination (χ2 test, p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Disease stage and 5-year survival
Full size table

The disease-free interval was calculated for a follow-up period of 60 months, regardless of the fact that in some patients the follow-up period was significantly longer (up to 150 months). The period without melanoma progression decreases progressively in the advanced stage, and the occurrence of parenchymal metastases is more frequent in later stages (Table 4). Based on the decision of the oncology advisory board, specific oncological therapy was determined for parenchymal metastases (29 patients).

Table 4 Disease stage and disease-free period
Full size table

Forty-nine patients (42%) underwent surgery for lymphogenic metastases in the parotid region and/or neck and superficial parotidectomy and radical neck dissection were performed (Table 5). In patients with stage III, extensive excision and radical neck dissection were simultaneously performed during the first surgery. During the follow-up of patients in stage III, six patients underwent neck surgery, including four reoperations on the same side of the neck, and two patients underwent dissection on the contralateral side of the neck.

Table 5 Disease stage and location of lymphogenic metastases
Full size table

Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to monitor the prognosis of patient survival in relation to the examined factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis (Fig. 1a) indicates a better prognosis in females (p = 0.031), while the localization of melanoma (Fig. 1b) does not affect survival (p = 0.253).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Kaplan-Meier data analysis in relation to gender of patients. b Kaplan-Meier data analysis in relation to location of melanoma

Full size image

Cox regression analysis of survival predictors (backward stepwise method) indicates that the presence of metastases at the first examination, higher Breslow thickness, and higher number of nearby lymph nodes that have cancer (N) are predictors of poor survival. Size of the primary tumor (T), although seemingly with a pronounced prognostic value (HR = 1.524), is at the very limit of statistical significance (p = 0.047; 95% CI = 1.005–2.311), so it still cannot be interpreted as one of the predictors. Gender was also not a significant predictor of survival (Table 6). Localization of tumor, presence of distant metastasis (M), Clark level, and disease-free period (DFP) were as variables removed from the model at previous steps of the backward stepwise Cox regression analysis as non significant.

Table 6 Cox regression survival predictor analysis
Full size table

Discussion

Our study included patients with head and neck melanoma (HNM) followed in the 5-year period from diagnosis. A total of 116 patients with HNM makes up 14.99% of all melanoma patients in the same time period, which represents a lower prevalence of HNM than in other studies [7]. HNM is more common in males (57.76%) and people older than 50 years (77.59%), but neither of the abovementioned predictors affects survival. El Sharouni et al. in a study of 54,645 patients point out to male gender as an important predictor of disease outcome [21]. The total 5-year survival in our sample is 30.2%, which is far less than the results in other studies [19, 20]. Reduced 5-year survival in our sample is associated with a large number of patients who consulted a doctor in an already advanced stage of the disease with present metastases (as many as 28.45% of patients in stages III and IV). Higher Breslow thickness, higher degree of tumor spread to regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastases at the first examination were highlighted as predictors for the poor outcome. They significantly affect the progressive reduction of the disease-free period, which corresponds to the results of other authors [3, 7, 22].

Our study showed that the primary localization of melanoma did not affect 5-year survival. The results of other studies indicate that melanoma of the scalp has a more aggressive clinical course with more frequent local recurrences, shorter disease-free period, and almost twice the chance of disease progression [22,23,24,25]. The conclusions of other authors on the influence of scalp melanoma on 5-year survival are divided. According to some authors, these localisation of primary melanoma do not make a significant difference in 5-year survival compared to melanoma of other head and neck regions [25,26,27,28], while Ozao-Choy et al. indicate that melanoma of the scalp significantly adversely affects 5-year survival compared to melanoma of other localizations of the head and neck [29, 30].

Den Hondt et al. in their paper point out the importance of elective neck dissection in patients with metastases in the parotid region. In our sample, 18% of patients with metastases had metastases in the parotid region of which as many as 89% of patients had failure in cervical nodes. Elective neck dissection not only reduces failure rates in cervical nodes but also provides more accurate information about the stage of the disease and prognosis [31].

Radical neck dissection (RND) was performed in 70 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically proven positive lymph nodes. In 22 patients who were in stage III at the first examination, RND was performed in the same act as radical excision of cutaneous melanoma. In other 48 patients, RND was performed during a follow-up, four of whom underwent redissection. The literature shows a great range in recurrence rates after neck dissection (from 0 to 43%) [16, 32,33,34,35,36,37]. In a study with a similar number of patients, Andersen et al. [38] stated that the recurrence rate after RND was 11%, which is similar to the percentage in our sample (6.06%). One interesting fact from our sample is that recurrences after RND occurred only in patients who were in stage III at the first examination, while in patients who underwent RND during the follow-up, there were no recurrences.

Song et al. indicate the importance of using systemic therapy in patients who were in the third stage of the disease at the time of the first examination due to the fact that recurrences in the lymph nodes occur more often in these patients and they have a poorer prognosis. The use of systemic therapy in these patients significantly improves 5-year survival [39].

However, since the incidence of head and neck cutaneous melanoma continues to increase all over the world, and that it dramatically affects quality of life both in patients and caregivers, the primary prevention and early diagnosis should become a priority [40, 41]. Excessive sun exposure and overuse of solarium have been established as the major cause of cutaneous melanoma, so the effect of health education on this behavior could be valuable, along with the secondary prevention measures of particularly at risk populations [42,43,44].

Conclusions

Patients with head and neck melanoma included in this study very often presented melanoma in an advanced stage of the disease at the first examination, which caused the low rate of 5-year survival. Treatment of head and neck melanoma is a great challenge due to frequent metastases to lymph nodes and the development of distant metastases. Therefore, in addition to adequate oncosurgical treatment, it is necessary to pay attention to postoperative monitoring and further treatment in accordance with treatment protocols.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Weinstock MA. Epidemiology, etiology, and control of melanoma. Med Health R I. 2001;84(7):234–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html (Accessed on 8 Oct 2020).

  3. Uslu U, Schuler G, Breuninger H. Factors influencing disease progression in patients with head and neck melanoma. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(7):3811–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw JHF, Fay M. Management of head and neck melanoma, treatment of metastatic melanoma. Morton R, editor. InTech; 2011. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/treatment-of-metastatic-melanoma/management-of-head-andneckmelanoma. ISBN: 978-953-307-574-7.

  5. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Retsas S, Henry K, Mohammed MQ, MacRae K. Prognostic factors of cutaneous melanoma and a new staging system proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC): validation in a cohort of 1284 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(4):511–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Qurayshi Z, Hassan M, Srivastav S, et al. Risk and survival of patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma: national perspective. Oncology. 2017;93(1):18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ow TJ, Grethlein SJ, Schmalbach CE. Education Committee of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS). Do you know your guidelines? Diagnosis and management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Head Neck. 2018;40(5):875–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Melanoma staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition and beyond. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. AJCC Staging Manuals. Available online: http://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/deskreferences/Documents/AJCC%207th%20Ed%20Cancer%20Staging%20Manual.pdf (Accessed on 8 Oct 2020).

  11. Yao K, Balch G, Winchester DJ. Multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(1):267–xi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balch CM, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, et al. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg. 1993;218(3):262–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Möhrle M, Schippert W, Rassner G, Garbe C, Breuninger H. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy of therapeutic relevance for melanoma? Dermatology. 2004;209:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Medalie N, Ackermann AB. Sentinel node biopsy has no benefit for patients whose primary cutaneous melanoma has metastasized to a lymph node and therefore should be abandoned now. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151:298–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Balch CM, Cascinelli N. Sentinel- node biopsy in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1370–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJ. Dilemma of clinically node-negative head and neck melanoma: outcome of “watch and wait” policy, elective lymph node dissection, and sentinel node biopsy – a systematic review. Head Neck. 2008;30:380–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Guidelines for patients: melanoma. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/content/PDF/melanoma-patient.pdf (Accessed on 8 Oct 2020).

  18. O’Brien CJ, McNeil EB, McMahon JD, Pathak I, Lauer CS. Incidence of cervical node involvement in metastatic cutaneous malignancy involving the parotid gland. Head Neck. 2001;23:744–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ch’ng S, Pinna A, Ioannou K, Juszczyk K, Shannon K, Clifford A, Uren R, Clark JR. Assessment of second tier lymph nodes in melanoma and implications for extent of elective neck dissection in metastatic cutaneous malignancy of the parotid. Head Neck. 2013;35(2):205–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lachiewicz AM, Berwick M, Wiggins CL, Thomas NE. Survival differences between patients with scalp or neck melanoma and those with melanoma of other sites in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(4):515–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El Sharouni MA, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, van Diest PJ, Louwman MWJ, Kukutsch NA. Sex matters: men with melanoma have a worse prognosis than women. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(11):2062–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Terakedis BE, Anker CJ, Leachman SA, et al. Patterns of failure and predictors of outcome in cutaneous malignant melanoma of the scalp. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(3):435–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leong SP, Accortt NA, Essner R, et al. Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(4):370–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien CJ, Coates AS, Petersen-Schaefer K, et al. Experience with 998 cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck over 30 years. Am J Surg. 1991;162(4):310–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shumate CR, Carlson GW, Giacco GG, et al. The prognostic implications of location for scalp melanoma. Am J Surg. 1991;162(4):315–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Giorgi V, Rossari S, Gori A, et al. The prognostic impact of the anatomical sites in the ‘head and neck melanoma’: scalp versus face and neck. Melanoma Res. 2012;22(5):402–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parrett BM, Kashani-Sabet M, Singer MI, et al. Long-term prognosis and significance of the sentinel lymph node in head and neck melanoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(4):699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cappello ZJ, Augenstein AC, Potts KL, et al. Sentinel lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with melanoma of the scalp. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(6):1411–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozao-Choy J, Nelson DW, Hiles J, Stern S, Yoon JL, Sim MS, Faries MB. The prognostic importance of scalp location in primary head and neck melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(3):337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie C, Pan Y, McLean C, Mar V, Wolfe R, Kelly J. Impact of scalp location on survival in head and neck melanoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):494–498.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Den Hondt M, Starr MW, Millett MC, Smyth J, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Thompson JF, Ch’ng S. Surgical management of the neck in patients with metastatic melanoma in parotid lymph nodes. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(8):1462–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mack LA, McKinnon JG. Controversies in the management of metastatic melanoma to regional lymphatic basins. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. White N, Yap LH, Srivastava S. Lymphadenectomy for melanoma in the clinically N1 neck: radical, modified radical, or selective? J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:385–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Turkula LD, Woods JE. Limited or selective nodal dissection for malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1984;148:446–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Van de Vrie W, Eggermont AM, Van Putten WL, et al. Therapeutic lymphadenectomy in melanomas of the head and neck. Head Neck. 1993;15:377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jonk A, Strobbe LJ, Kroon BB, et al. Cervical lymph­node metastasis from cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck: a search for prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:298–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen P, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Is adjuvant radiotherapy necessary after positive lymph node dissection in head and neck melanomas? Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:554–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersen PS, Chakera AH, Thamsborg AK, et al. Recurrence and survival after neck dissections in cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Dan Med J. 2014;61(12):A4953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Song Y, Tieniber AD, Gimotty PA, Mitchell TC, Amaravadi RK, Schuchter LM, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC. Survival outcomes of patients with clinical stage III melanoma in the era of novel systemic therapies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(13):4621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Berwick M, Buller DB, Cust A, Gallagher R, Lee TK, Meyskens F, Pandey S, Thomas NE, Veierød MB, Ward S. Melanoma epidemiology and prevention. Cancer Treat Res. 2016;167:17–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Resteghini C, Trama A, Borgonovi E, Hosni H, Corrao G, Orlandi E, Calareso G, De Cecco L, Piazza C, Mainardi L, Licitra L. Big data in head and neck cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018;19(12):62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen N, Fedewa S, Chen AY. Epidemiology and demographics of the head and neck cancer population. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30(4):381–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sterba KR, Zapka J, Cranos C, Laursen A, Day TA. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patient-caregiver dyads: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(3):238–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilmore S. Melanoma screening: informing public health policy with quantitative modelling. PLoSONE. 2017;12(9):e0182349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project 43012 and Project 41018).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, 18000, Serbia

    Aleksandar Višnjić

  2. Institute of Public Health of Niš, Niš, 18000, Serbia

    Aleksandar Višnjić & Mariola Stojanović

  3. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, 18000, Serbia

    Predrag Kovačević

  4. Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Centre of Niš, Niš, 18000, Serbia

    Predrag Kovačević & Stefan Mladenović

  5. Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Orthopedics, Kreisklinik Roth, Roth, 91154, Germany

    Asen Veličkov

Authors
  1. Aleksandar Višnjić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Predrag Kovačević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asen Veličkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mariola Stojanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stefan Mladenović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, AV and PK; methodology, AV and MS; software, MS; validation, AV, PK, and AV; formal analysis, AV, AV, and MS; investigation, AV and SM; resources, AV and SM; writing—original draft preparation, AV, PK, and AV; writing—review and editing, AV, PK, AV, and SM; visualization, SM; supervision, AV, PK, AV, MS, and SM; project administration, PK, AV, and SM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Mladenović.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study procedures were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approval of the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Niš.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent from the patients was obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Višnjić, A., Kovačević, P., Veličkov, A. et al. Head and neck cutaneous melanoma: 5-year survival analysis in a Serbian university center. World J Surg Onc 18, 312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02091-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02091-4

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us