Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 18, Article number: 298 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

Ninety patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer were divided into 2 groups: the general anesthesia group (GA group, n = 45) and the TPVB group (TP group, n = 45). The primary outcome was the decline rate of the 6-min walking test (6MWT); the second outcomes were as follows: absolute value and the completion rate of 6MWT, postoperative analgesia deficiency and pain scores, oxycodone consumption, sleep quality, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, and the hospital stay.

Results

Compared with the GA group, the TP group had a lower decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 and POD2. The walking distance on POD1 and POD2 in the TP group was significantly longer than that in the GA group; the completion rate at POD1 in the TP group was higher than that in the GA group. The pain scores and oxycodone consumption at POD1 in the TP group were lower than the GA group. The sleep quality in the TP group was higher than the GA group.

Conclusions

TPVB can significantly improve postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery, which is helpful for promoting the early recovery of patients.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026213. Registered 26 Sept. 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43733.

Introduction

Lung cancer has a high incidence and accounts for a large proportion of thoracic surgeries. Radical resection of lung cancer is traumatic, and early postoperative pain is obvious, which is not conducive to rapid recovery [1, 2]. The improvement of anesthesia factors has positive significance for promoting the rehabilitation of patients. Thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) is an important method of multimodal analgesia that can reduce acute pain and opioid dosage after thoracoscopic surgery [3,4,5]. Early postoperative bedside activities have been recognized as important to recovery after surgery, which can be hampered by severe pain. Reduced pain can help patients carry out postoperative rehabilitation training.

The 6-min walking test (6MWT) is a simple and effective method for evaluating patients’ cardiopulmonary function, which has a guiding significance for the quality of postoperative recovery from lung cancer [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The effect of TPVB on the quality of early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer remains unclear.

In this study, patients who underwent thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery (thoracoscopic lobectomy plus systemic lymph node dissection) [1] were enrolled. The 6MWT and other measurements were selected to evaluate the effect of TPVB on the early rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer. It was hypothesized that early postoperative rehabilitation could be enhanced by TPVB.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This randomized, double-blind study enrolled 90 patients from Oct. 2019 to May 2020. This prospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital [Ethics approval number: 2019-Lunshen-41]. Written informed consent and information release approvals were obtained from all patients prior to their participation in the study. Trial registration—Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026213. Registered 26 Sept. 2019-Prospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43733. The study protocol compline with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Characteristics of participants

Ninety patients with lung cancer, aged 18-65 years, with a BMI of 18-25 kg/m2 and an ASA status of I-III, were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: the general anesthesia group (GA group, n = 45) and the TPVB combined with general anesthesia group (TP group, n = 45).

Inclusion criteria

Confirmed preoperative diagnosis; no history of diabetes, blood disease, or other metabolic disorders; no chronic obstructive or (and) restrictive lung disease; a forced vital capacity > 80% of the predicted value and a first second expiratory rate > 70% of the predicted value; and no smoking history within 2 weeks before the operation.

Exclusion criteria

Communication difficulties; inability to cooperate with researchers; history of preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy; severe cardio-cerebrovascular disease; previous history of other operations; refusal to participate in the trial; drop-out from the trial; and data loss.

Preoperative preparations and anesthesia protocol

No patients received pretreatment before admission to the operating room. All patients were monitored by electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, invasive blood pressure recordings, and bispectral index values.

Operation of TPVB

TPVB was administered by using S-Nerve ultrasound (SonoSite, USA). Two points (T4-5 and T6-7) were selected for blocking, with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine at each point. The success of the block was verified by using skin temperature sensation and tactile sensation in the corresponding area with alcohol-soaked cotton balls [12].

The blinding principle was well controlled in the present study. First, patients were delivered to the pre-anesthesia room. An anesthesiologist who was blinded to this study prepared the drugs and TPVB. All the catheter insertion sites were covered with a film dressing to conceal which approach was being used.

Anesthesia induction

After intravenous injection of 0.08-0.12 mg/kg midazolam, 0.1-1.0 g/kg sufentanil, 0.2-0.6 mg/kg etomidate, and 0.6-0.9 mg/kg rocuronium, a double-lumen bronchial tube was inserted. Mechanical ventilation was performed after induction: FiO2 70%, oxygen flow 1.0-1.5 L/min, VT 6-8 ml/kg, RR 10-14 times/min, and I:E 1:2. During single-lung ventilation, the RR was 12-16 times/min, the other parameters remained unchanged, PETCO2 was maintained at 35-45 mmHg, and the peak airway pressure was maintained lower than 30 cm H2O.

Anesthesia maintenance

Both groups received intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil to maintain the depth of anesthesia and intermittent intravenous infusion of cis-atracurium to maintain muscle relaxation. The infusion rate of propofol was adjusted to maintain a BIS of 40-50, and the fluctuation ranges of the HR and MAP were maintained at no more than 20% of the baseline values. The intraoperative intravenous infusion of Ringer’s solution of sodium lactate was 1-3 ml/kg/h. The postoperative analgesia pump was consistent between the two groups. In addition, 1 mg/kg oxycodone was added to postoperative patient-controlled analgesia pump for postoperative analgesia.

Measurements

A respiratory therapist who was unaware of the study performed a 6MWT for each patient on the day before surgery (POD0), the first day after the operation (POD1), the second day after the operation (POD2), and the third day after the operation (POD3) [9,10,11].

The primary outcome of this study was the decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 [(6MWTPOD0−6MWTPOD1)/6MWTPOD0].

The secondary outcomes of this study were as follows: the absolute value of walking distance; the completion rate of the test (completion rate = number of completed cases per group/total number of cases per group), with the following reasons why patients could not complete the 6MWT: (1) chest pain, (2) intolerable dyspnea, (3) leg cramps, (4) staggering, (5) diaphoresis, and (6) a pale or ashen appearance [13]; the insufficiency of postoperative analgesia within 24 h (VAS ≥ 4 at rest); pain scores at POD1, POD2, and POD3; oxycodone consumption in the first 24 h after surgery; sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale was used to evaluate sleep quality) [14, 15]; the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications [16, 17]; and the hospital stay. According to the study by Sun et al. [12], the complications directly related to TPVB were also observed.

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated with “Power and Sample Size.com,” an online power and sample size calculator. The primary objective of this study was the effect of TPVB on the decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1. According to our preliminary results, the decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 in the GA group was 66%. We hypothesized that the decline rate would have a 50% improvement in the TP group. A sample size of 33 patients in each arm was calculated by using a power of 0.8, a P value of 0.05, and a type-I error of 5%. Taking into account patients lost to follow-up, we enrolled 45 patients in each group.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. The measurement data for a normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; the non-normal data were expressed as the median and interquartile range; and the normal count data were compared with the chi-square test, the non-normal data were compared with the rank-sum test, and the repeated data were compared with repeated measures ANOVA. p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the patients

In this study, 90 patients were included. Due to changes in surgical methods, intraoperative blood transfusion, and failure to implement the 6MWT (non-patient factors), 15 patients were excluded. Finally, 75 patients were analyzed, 41 in the TP group and 34 in the GA group, as shown in Fig. 1. There was no significant difference in the general conditions between the two groups (p > 0.05), as shown in Table 1. No complications directly related to TPVB occurred.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients
Full size table

Results of the 6MWT in the two groups

There was no significant difference in the 6MWT on POD0 between the two groups (p > 0.05). Compared with the GA group, the TP group had a lower decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 and POD2 (p < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 2a. The 6MWT distance on POD1 and POD2 in the TP group was significantly longer than that in the GA group (p < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 2b. The completion rate on POD1 in the TP group was higher than that in the GA group (p < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 2c.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Results of the 6MWT in the two groups. Comparison of 6MWT between the two groups. a The decline rate of 6MWT in the two groups at different time points. Compared with GA group, TP group had a lower decline rate of 6MWT on the POD1 and POD2. b The absolute value of 6MWT at different time points between the two groups. The 6MWT distance on the POD1 and POD2 was significantly greater in the TP group than that GA group. c The completion rate of 6MWT between the two groups. The completion rate on POD1 was higher in the TP group than the GA group. *p < 0.05, compared with the GA group

Full size image

Postoperative complications, analgesia, sleep quality, and hospital stay

Postoperative pulmonary complications (number and rate) occurred in 7 patients (17.0%) and 8 patients (23.5%) in the TP group and GA group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence (number and rate) of postoperative analgesia deficiency in the two groups was as follows: TP group (2 cases, 4.88%) and GA group (2 cases, 5.88%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative analgesia deficiency between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the TP group and GA group (p > 0.05), as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of postoperative pulmonary complications, analgesia and length of hospital stay
Full size table

The pain scores at POD1 in the TP group were lower than the GA group (p < 0.05). The PSQI score in the TP group was higher than the GA group (p < 0.05). Patients in the TP group received less oxycodone than the GA group in the first 24 h after surgery (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Comparison of VAS score, PSQI and oxycodone consumption between groups
Full size table

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that the decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 could be improved by TPVB after radical thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to discuss the effect of TPVB on the 6MWT. The absolute walking distance and completion rate benefited from TPVB. Based on the conclusions, early rehabilitation after thoracoscopic surgery can be enhanced by TPVB.

In this study, the same group of surgeons was selected to balance the effects of different surgical skills and perioperative management. The same professional respiratory therapist who was not aware of the study was selected for performing the 6MWT to ensure the authenticity and objectivity of the results. To ensure the objectivity of the data, anesthesiologists and professional anesthesiology nurses who were not aware of the experimental groups were selected for postoperative follow-up and statistical analysis of the data.

Early bedside activities after surgery are helpful for rapid recovery and can provide the basic conditions for postoperative recovery. The 6MWT is a simple and effective method to evaluate patients’ cardiopulmonary function, which can reflect exercise endurance and predict the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications to a certain extent [7, 13]. It is one of the bases for formulating a postoperative rehabilitation plan and has a guiding significance for the postoperative rehabilitation quality of lung cancer patients.

Three main aspects of 6MWT were evaluated in this study: decline rate of walking distance, absolute walking distance, and completion rate. The results indicated that the decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 and POD2 was lower in the TP group than in the GA group, in addition to that, the absolute distance of the 6MWT in the TP group was significantly greater than that in the GA group on POD1 and POD2, the completion rate of the 6MWT on POD1 was higher in the TP group than in the GA group. The decline rate of the walking test, the absolute value, and the completion rate were consistent, especially on POD1. These results indicate that thoracic paravertebral nerve block can improve the early mobility in patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer and can provide the necessary conditions for promoting early recovery.

Pulmonary complications represent an important group of complications after radical resection for lung cancer and can prolong the hospital stay. One retrospective study showed that general anesthesia combined with TPVB may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications [18], and other studies have shown that TPVB can shorten the postoperative hospital stay [19, 20]. Our study showed that there was no difference in postoperative pulmonary complications or hospital stay between the two groups. The following may be reasons for these results: (1) there are many influencing factors for pulmonary complications, which require the comprehensive application of multiple strategies; (2) there are differences in the methods of TPVB.

As is well known, pneumothorax, puncturing of blood vessels, and local hematoma are common complications of TPVB. According to the study by Sun et al. [12], the complications directly related to TPVB were also observed. No complications directly related to TPVB occurred in our study.

Numerous studies have shown that TPVB can reduce postoperative acute pain [21, 22]. Our results showed that the pain scores at POD1 in the TP group were lower than the GA group. The oxycodone consumption in the TP group was less than the GA group. TPVB alleviated the acute pain at POD1 and decreased the opioid consumption. However, the occurrence of postoperative insufficient analgesia was evaluated in this study. There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative insufficient analgesia between the two groups. The possible reasons were speculated as follows: (1) the incidence of postoperative overall insufficient analgesia tends to decrease after minimally invasive surgery; (2) the analgesic effect was evaluated 24 h after the operation, and the earlier pain level within 24 h after the operation was not evaluated; and (3) the index of analgesia evaluation in this study was resting pain, and no evaluation was made for motion pain. Although there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative analgesia deficiency between the two groups on POD1, patients in the TP group, who had a better performance on the 6MWT, benefited from TPVB.

High quality of sleep helps patients recover after surgery. However, the sleep quality after surgery is usually poor. Postoperative pain is one of the important causes of poor postoperative sleep quality [23]. Our results showed that the sleep quality was improved due to the TPVB. We speculate that TPVB’s relief of postoperative pain may be one of the reasons for its improvement of postoperative sleep quality.

At the same time, we also found that the differences between the two groups were concentrated on POD1 and POD2 after the operation. Although the results showed that TPVB could not significantly improve pulmonary complications or hospital stay, TPVB could promote the early rehabilitation of patients and supply a foundation for rapid rehabilitation.

There are several limitations in this study. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small due to the single-center study. Multicenter studies should be conducted in the future. Secondly, postoperative recovery includes multiple influencing factors. Only TPVB was discussed in this study. Multimode rehabilitation strategies should be administered to achieve the purpose of enhanced recovery. Thirdly, our results are only valid for thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery, and not for all thoracic surgeries.

Overall, the 6MWT could be improved by TPVB in this study. TPVB can significantly improve postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery, which is helpful for promoting the early recovery of patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body mass index

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspiration oxygen

VT:

Tidal volume

RR:

Respiratory rate

I:E:

Inspiratory:expiratory

BIS:

Bispectral index

PETCO2 :

End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure

HR:

Heart rate

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

6MWT:

6-min walking test

VATS:

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

POD0:

The day before surgery

POD1:

The first day after the operation

POD2:

The second day after the operation

POD3:

The third day after the operation

References

  1. Sihoe A. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery. Respirology. 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13920.

  2. Young R, McElnay P, Leslie R, et al. Is uniport thoracoscopic surgery less painful than multiple port approaches? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(3):409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marhofer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the spread of local anesthetic solution after ultrasound-guided lateral thoracic paravertebral blockade: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(5):1106–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taketa Y. Y. Irisawa and T. Fujitani, Comparison of analgesic efficacy between two approaches of paravertebral block for thoracotomy: a randomised trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(9):1274–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydin G, Aydin O, The efficacy of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2018;54(5):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54050075.

  6. Nakagawa T, Chiba N, Saito M, et al. Clinical relevance of decreased oxygen saturation during 6-min walk test in preoperative physiologic assessment for lung cancer surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(10):620–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng GS, Chen LC, Fan HZ, et al. The relationship between steps of 6MWT and COPD severity: a cross-sectional study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:141–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Szczegielniak J, Latawiec KJ, Łuniewski J, et al. A study on nonlinear estimation of submaximal effort tolerance based on the generalized MET concept and the 6MWT in pulmonary rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks D, Solway S, Gibbons WJ. ATS statement on six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(9):1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Przybylowski T, Tomalak W, Siergiejko Z, et al. Polish Respiratory Society guidelines for the methodology and interpretation of the 6 minute walk test (6MWT). Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015;83(4):283–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Southard V, Gallagher R. The 6MWT: will different methods of instruction and measurement affect performance of healthy aging and older adults? J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013;36(2):68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun L, Li Q, Wang Q, et al. Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orbach-Zinger S, Fireman S, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Preoperative sleep quality predicts postoperative pain after planned caesarean delivery [J]. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(5):787–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CR, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research [J]. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA, Strasberg SM. Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):197–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeratichananont W, Thanadetsuntorn C, Keeratichananont S. Value of preoperative 6-minute walk test for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016;10(1):18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong C, Zhu H, Li B, et al. Impact of paravertebral blockade use in geriatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery on postoperative adverse outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(12):5169–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu Z, Liu D, Wang ZZ, et al. The efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(51):e13771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malik M, Black EA. Fast-track video-assisted bullectomy and pleurectomy for pneumothorax: initial experience and description of technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(5):906–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly ME, Mc Nicholas D, Killen J, et al. Thoracic paravertebral blockade in breast surgery: is pneumothorax an appreciable concern? A review of over 1000 cases. Breast J. 2018;24(1):23–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, et al. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD009121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller A, Roth T, Roehrs T, et al. Correlation between sleep disruption on postoperative pain. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):964–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study was supported by the grants from the Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Research Project Joint Construction Project (LHGJ20190607) and Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (2018020844). The funding body played the roles in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Perioperative Medicine and Anesthesiology, Henan University People’s Hospital; Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, No. 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China

    Kang Kang, Xing Meng, Bing Li, Jingli Yuan, Jiaqiang Zhang & Wei Zhang

  2. Department of Cardiology, Henan University People’s Hospital, No. 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China

    Erhu Tian

Authors
  1. Kang Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xing Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jingli Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erhu Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiaqiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KK: Manuscript and data analysis. XM: Follow up. BL: Primary anesthesiologist. JLY: Data collection. EHT: Data analysis. JQZ: Implementation of the study. WZ: Design and clinical studies. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This prospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of People’s Hospital of Henan University and written informed consent was obtained from patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, K., Meng, X., Li, B. et al. Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery. World J Surg Onc 18, 298 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us