Skip to main content
Download PDF

Significance of accurate hilar and intrapulmonary lymph node examination and prognostication in stage IA–IIA non-small cell lung cancer, a retrospective cohort study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 18, Article number: 258 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The examination of lymph nodes (LNs) plays an important role in the nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients without LN metastasis, the main role of thorough LN examination is accurate staging, which weakens the effect of staging migration. To date, the role of hilar and intrapulmonary (N1) station LNs has not been fully appreciated. In this study, we aimed to confirm the significance of N1 LNs in long-term survival for stage IA–IIA NSCLC patients and to find the minimum number of LN to examine.

Methods

The data of patients who underwent radical lobectomy and were confirmed as having non-metastatic LNs from January 2008 to March 2018 were retrospectively screened. Pathology records were reviewed for the number of LNs examined. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to identify survival and prognostic factors.

Results

The median number of resected N1 LNs was 8. The number of patients with 0–2 N1 LNs, 3–5 N1 LNs, 6–8 N1 LNs, 9–11 N1 LNs, and more than 11 N1 LNs examined was 181, 425, 477, 414, and 531, respectively. Sex (P = 0.004), age (P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.004), differentiation degree (P = 0.001), and number of N1 LNs examined (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Gender (P = 0.006), age (P = 0.031), tumor size (P = 0.001), differentiation degree (P = 0.001), vascular invasion (P = 0.034), and number of N1 LNs examined (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors of disease-free survival. Compared with patients with 0–5 N1 LNs examined, patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined had better OS (P = 0.015) and had better DFS (P = 0.015) if only a landmark 5-year follow-up was performed.

Conclusion

Increasing the number of N1 LN examination might improve the long-term survival of T1-2N0 NSCLC patients. These data indicate that at least 6 N1 nodes examined is an essential part in surgical and pathological management but cannot prove this. This finding should be confirmed in a large, prospective randomized clinical study.

Background

Lung cancer remains the most common type of cancer worldwide [1]. For patients with stage IA–IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy with systemic lymph node (LN) dissection or systematic LN sampling remains the standard therapy [2, 3]. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with stages IA–IIA is about 60–92% [4].

Despite radical resection, patients still have a high risk of recurrence. Kelsey et al. reported that the 5-year actuarial risk of disease recurrence was 36% in patients with stage I–II NSCLC [5]. Inadequate LN examination may be an important risk factor for recurrence [6]. The examination of LNs plays an important role in accurate node staging, and node-positive patients need adjuvant therapy to reduce their risk of recurrence [7]. For node-positive patients, the removal of metastatic LNs has a therapeutic effect. However, for node-negative patients, the main role of thorough LN examination is accurate staging, which weakens the effect of staging migration. The so-called staging migration refers to the insufficient LN examination to make LN-positive staging migrate to LN-negative staging. There is still no consensus regarding the optimal number of perioperative LNs to be retrieved for pathological examination. Some studies have shown that a minimum of 10 LNs should be examined to guarantee an accurate N stage [8, 9]. Liang et al. mentioned at least 16 LNs should be removed during the surgical procedure [10]. For mediastinal (N2) station LNs, the debate is mainly concentrated on the selection between systemic mediastinal LN dissection and selective mediastinal LN sampling. Several researchers believe that mediastinal LN dissection should be routinely performed during surgeries [7, 11]. In contrary, some studies revealed that selective mediastinal LN sampling had a similar impact on surgical outcomes compared with systemic mediastinal LN dissection for early NSCLC [12,13,14]. Currently, few studies have focused on the examination of intrapulmonary or hilar (N1) station LNs. To assess the effect of N1 LN examination on the survival of stages IA–IIA NSCLC patients, we retrospectively screened 3014 NSCLC patients from our center and found the minimum number of N1 LNs to examine.

Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). The data of patients who underwent radical surgery at the Thoracic Surgery Department of SYSUCC between January 2008 and March 2018 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria included the following: (1) confirmed pathological diagnosis of NSCLC, (2) pathologically staged as IA–IIA (T1a-2BN0M0), and (3) confirmed negative surgical margin (R0). The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) underwent neoadjuvant therapy, (2) had multiple primary cancers, (3) underwent sublobectomy, and (4) the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) time of less than 1 month. All patients were restaged according to the TNM staging criteria of the 8th National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) staging system.

Definition and examination of N1 LNs

In this study, the dissection of N1 and N2 LN stations was performed by surgeons and reconfirmed by pathologists. N1 LNs specifically refer to LNs in the lobe in which the tumor is located. N2 and hilar LNs were dissected by surgeons during the operation. Interlobar, lobar, segmental, and subsegmental LNs were extracorporeally dissected from lung specimens by surgeons after surgery. The information on the number of LNs examined and other pathological factors were reviewed from pathology reports.

Follow-up

Follow-ups were performed every 3 months in the first 2 years, every 6 months until 5 years, and once a year thereafter. Surgeons would prescribe chest radiography, ultrasonography, or computed tomography (CT) scans as needed during follow-up. The study endpoints were OS and DFS, which were defined as the time from surgery to death and the time from surgery to first the locoregional or distant recurrence or death, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software, version 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare quantitative data and Pearson’s χ2, or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare categorical data between five groups. The OS and DFS were estimated by using the method of Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for survival. The variables assessed in this study included age, gender, tumor size, smoking history, 8th TNM stage, histology, differentiation degree, visceral pleural invasion, vascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy, number of N2 LNs examined, number of N1 LNs examined, and the thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The number of N2 LNs examined was treated as rank variable categorized into 6 groups, namely, 0 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 8, 9 to 11, 12 to 15, and more than 15. The number of N1 LNs examined was also treated as rank variable categorized into 5 groups, namely, 0 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 8, 9 to 11, and more than 11. Variables whose P values were < 0.1 in univariate analyses were included in multivariate analyses. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and all hypotheses were two-sided.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 2028 patients were eligible for analysis (Fig. 1). The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age of the 1207 male and 812 female patients investigated was 61 years (range, 20 to 83 years). The main pathological type was adenocarcinoma (n = 1567). A total of 266 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. More than half of the patients (n = 1101) underwent minimally invasive VATS, and 927 patients underwent traditional thoracotomy. The median number of N2 LNs examined was 11 (range, 0 to 104). The median number of N1 LNs examined was 8 (range, 0 to 38). The number of patients with 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, and > 11 examined N1 LNs was 181 (8.9%), 425 (21.0%), 477 (23.5%), 414 (20.4%), and 531(26.2%), respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of this study

Full size image
Table 1 Patients characteristics
Full size table

Survival analysis

The 5-year OS rates of patients with 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, and > 11 examined N1 LNs were 73.8%, 85.4%, 89.4%, 84.0%, and 87.8%, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates of patients with 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, and > 11 examined N1 LNs were 60.1%, 74.6%, 75.1%, 76.4%, and 77.3%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2, patients with 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, and > 11 examined N1 LNs had clearly different OS (log-rank p = 0.045, Fig. 2a) and DFS rates (log-rank p = 0.045, Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a OS for patients with different N1 LNs examined patients. b DFS for patients with different N1 LNs examined patients

Full size image

As shown in Table 2, age, gender, tumor size, smoking history, 8th TNM stage, differentiation degree, vascular invasion, and number of N1 LNs examined were statistically significant in univariate analysis of OS, and visceral pleural invasion also had a p value less than 0.1. In multivariate analysis, advanced age (P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 1.042; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.026–1.059), larger tumor size (P = 0.004; HR 1.280; 95% CI 1.081–1.516), and differentiation degree (P = 0.001; HR 1.350; 95% CI 1.064–1.714) were negatively correlated with OS. Male sex (P = 0.004; HR 0.535; 95% CI 0.351–0.814) and number of N1 LNs examined (P = 0.007) were positively correlated with OS. Patients with > 11 N1 LNs (P < 0.001; HR 0.427; 95% CI 0.266–0.688) and 6–8 N1 LNs (P = 0.002; HR 0.484; 95% CI 0.304–0.770) examined were the two groups with the lowest HR value. All factors except adjuvant chemotherapy, number of N2 LNs examined, and thoracotomy or VATS had a P value less than 0.1 in the univariate analysis of DFS and were enrolled in multivariate analysis (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, advanced age (P = 0.031; HR 1.012; 95% CI 1.001–1.023), larger tumor size (P = 0.001; HR 1.237; 95% CI 1.094–1.399), differentiation degree (P = 0.001; HR 1.331; 95% CI 1.119–1.584), and vascular invasion (P = 0.034; HR 1.506; 95% CI 1.031–2.200) were negatively correlated with DFS. Male sex (P = 0.006; HR 0.663; 95% CI 0.495–0.888) and the number of N1 LNs examined were positively correlated with DFS. Patients with > 11 N1 LNs (P = 0.001; HR 0.542; 95% CI 0.384–0.766) and 9–11 N1 LNs (P = 0.002; HR 0.570; 95% CI 0.399–0.813) examined were the two groups with the lowest HR value.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of OS
Full size table
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS
Full size table

Then, we compared prognosis between patients with 0–5 N1 LNs examined and patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined. As shown in Fig. 3, the 5-year OS rates of patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined was significantly higher than the 5-year OS rates of patients with 0–5 N1 LNs examined (87.1% versus 81.9%, log-rank P = 0.015, Fig. 3a), while the 5-year DFS rates of patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined was not apparently higher than the 5-year DFS rates of patients with 0–5 N1 LNs examined (76.2% versus 70.2%, log-rank p = 0.106, Fig. 3b). And examining more than 5 N1 LNs is a positive prognostic factor in multivariate analyses of OS (P = 0.013; HR 0.704; 95% CI 0.533–0.929) and DFS (P = 0.035; HR 0.800; 95% CI 0.650–0.984). If only a landmark 5-year follow-up was performed, patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined had significantly better DFS (P = 0.015, Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a OS for patients with 0–5 and more than 5 N1 LNs examined patients. b DFS for patients with 0–5 and more than 5 N1 N1 LNs examined patients. c Five-year DFS for patients with 0–5 and more than 5 N1 LNs examined patients

Full size image

Discussion

In the treatment of NSCLC patients, accurate node staging is important for predicting prognosis and selecting an appropriate treatment strategy. Clinical N staging based solely on CT and positron emission tomography (PET) is not accurate enough for early NSCLC [15]. Thorough postoperative pathological N examination is optimal for N staging. The number of LNs examined is an intuitive indicator of examination thoroughness. In this study, we found that the number of N1 LNs examined was an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS for stage IA–IIA patients.

There are some potential explanations for the survival advantage brought by the larger number of N1 LNs examined. An increasing number of N1 LNs examined would lead to a greater probability of discovering metastasized LNs in the hilum and lung, leading to stage migration, which is considered to be the main factor for the improvement of OS and DFS in patients with a large number of N1 LNs examined. Inadequate LN examination may result in some metastatic LNs not being detected, and patients would be wrongly staged as IA or IB when they should be staged as IIB and receive adjuvant therapy. The resection of micrometastases and the effect of the immunologic microenvironment may also be related to the survival advantage brought by the larger number of N1 LNs examined [16,17,18,19]. In this study, patients who underwent sublobectomy were excluded which means all intrapulmonary lymph nodes are removed along with the lobes. The resection of micrometastases did not have a significant impact on the survival advantage brought by the larger number of N1 LNs examined.

Several researchers have emphasized that a larger number of LNs examined could increase the accuracy of N staging and enhance prognosis. Samayoa et al. retrospectively analyzed 98,970 patients from The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and found that the amounts of LNs examination apparently affect the long-term survival, and at least 10 LNs should be examined in surgical management [17]. Ou and Zell retrospectively investigated the data of 2545 patients and confirmed that the number of LN examination was the favorable prognostic factor for stage IA patients and suggested that the removal of 11–15 LNs could improve the patients prognosis [20]. However, the above two studies did not separately analyze the effects of N1 and N2 LNs on survival.

In our pilot study, the number of LNs examined was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.005). In this study, the survival advantage from the increase in the number of LNs examined should be attributed to the increase in the number of N1 LNs examined, which might be associated with the following reason. The patients in this study underwent a high-quality mediastinal LN dissection. The number of patients with at least 1, 2, and 3 N2 stations dissected was 1992 (98.2%), 1864 (91.9%), and 1457 (71.8%), respectively, and the median number of N2 LNs examined was 11 in this study. The median number of N2 LNs examined was 12 in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0030 trial which had a superb quality of N2 LN examination [21]. There is no apparent difference in the median number of N2 LNs examined between this study and the ACOSOG Z0030 trial. As the number of N2 LNs examined increases, the survival advantage decreases when the quality of N2 LN examination increases to a high level. The number of N2 LNs examined lost statistical significance in the Cox regression model. However, this result cannot deny the vital role of N2 LN examination in node staging. Both N1 and N2 LN examinations are important for accurate node staging.

Some researchers have focused on the importance of the number of N1 LNs examined. Saynak et al. reported that T1N0 patients with inadequate N1 LNs examined had similar local recurrence-free survival compared with T1N1 patients [22]. The ACOSOG Z0030 trial also found a tendency that the greater the number of intrapulmonary LNs examined, the better the patient survival outcomes [23]. Varlotto et al. demonstrated that a minimum of 11 to 16 LNs should be examined when examining only N1 lymph nodes [24]. Similar to the finding of the above study, patients with more than 11 N1 LNs examined had the lowest HR values in the multivariate analyses of OS and DFS, signifying that at least 12 N1 LNs should be examined to achieve optimal OS and DFS. However, it is difficult to accomplish this goal in clinical practice. Only 26.2% of patients accepted the examination of more than 11 N1 LNs in this study. On the one hand, patients with 6–8 N1 LNs examined had the second lowest HR values in the multivariate analysis of OS, and patients with more than 5 N1 LNs examined had better OS and DFS in landmark 5-year follow-up. The survival analyses showed examining at least 6 N1 LNs could bring survival advantages. On the other hand, the median number of N1 LNs examined in this study was 8, which means that more than half of the patients did not have at least 9 N1 LNs examined. As a comparison, the median number of N1 LNs examined was 5 in the ACOSOG Z0030 trial and 5 in Saynak et al.’s study. It is not easy to examine at least 9 N1 LNs for each patient. The clinical decision should be feasible, and at least 6 N1 LNs examined is a realistic goal in clinical practice. Therefore, we recommend at least 6 N1 LNs examined in surgical and pathological management.

However, the examination of N1 LNs has not received enough attention. One of the phenomena was that the quality of LN examination exhibits noteworthy variability during surgical and pathological management [25, 26]. Another phenomenon is that incomplete intrapulmonary LNs were retrieved in pathological examination. One previous study revealed that a median of six additional LNs was discovered after rechecking remnant lung specimens, and the median number of N1 LNs examined was only 3 in the community-based Memphis Metropolitan Area Quality of Surgical Resection cohort [27]. Although N2 LN examinations were of superb quality, the median number of N1 LNs examined was 5 in the ACOSOG Z0030 trial [21]. In this study, the median number of resected N1 LNs was eight. The pattern of LN examination in which N1 LNs were dissected by surgeons and reconfirmed by pathologists contributed to this result.

In addition to insufficient attention to N1 LN examination possibly affecting the number of N1 LNs examined, the surgical approach may also affect the number of N1 LNs examined. Subramanian et al. reviewed 1687 patients with stage IA NSCLC from the National Cancer Database, and included 1354 patients who underwent lobectomy and 333 patients who underwent sublobar resections. They found that sublobar resection had inadequate LNs examined and was associated with a 39% increased risk of recurrence. The majority of patients were treated with sublobar resection [28]. For both sublobar resection and lobectomy, the procedure of mediastinal LN dissection does not have apparent differences. However, sublobar resection, especially wedge resection, might lose some N1 LNs, which is associated with poor outcomes. In addition, when we dissected intrapulmonary LNs, we found a phenomenon in which patients whose primary tumor was near a segmental bronchus were prone to segmental LN metastases. Therefore, we suggest that patients whose primary tumor is near a segmental bronchus need a careful intrapulmonary LN dissection. Furthermore, intrapulmonary LNs are dissected extracorporeally, if 6 lymph nodes were not dissected in the first operation, it is safe to dissect the lung specimens again to take an LN sample for accurate staging.

There are some limitations to this study. First, this was a single-center retrospective study and associated biases may have been inevitable, and external validation was not performed to validate the findings. Second, this study lacks incidence of local LN failure which makes “stage migration” more convincing. Although intrapulmonary node was removed with lobe, local LN failure will still be associated with unsatisfied hilar LN dissection. In addition, the data of this study did not find a survival advantage from the increase in the number of N2 LNs examined and cannot answer how many N2 LNs should be examined in surgical and pathological management. Therefore, further validation from multicenter database is needed, and, the findings from this study should be cautiously interpreted.

Conclusions

Increasing the number of N1 LNs examined might improve the long-term survival of T1-2N0 NSCLC patients. The data of this study indicate that at least 6 N1 nodes examined is an essential part in surgical and pathological management but cannot prove this. This finding should be confirmed in a large, prospective randomized clinical study.

Availability of data and materials

The key raw data have been deposited into the Research Data Deposit (http://www.researchdata.org.cn), with the approval number of RDDA2020001355, and the datasets used in this study are publicly available.

Abbreviations

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

LDCT:

Low-dose computed tomography

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

LN:

Lymph node

OS:

Overall survival

DFS:

Disease-free survival

ACOSOG:

American College of Surgeons Oncology Group

References

  1. Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, Xu RH. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 global cancer statistics? Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019;39(1):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, Balekian AA, Murthy SC. Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e278S–313S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin K, Zhang K, Zhou F, Dai J, Zhang P, Jiang G. Selection of candidates for surgery as local therapy among early-stage small cell lung cancer patients: a population-based analysis. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018;38(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberhardt WE, Mitchell A, Crowley J, Kondo H, Kim YT, Turrisi A III, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(1):39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelsey CR, Marks LB, Hollis D, Hubbs JL, Ready NE, D’Amico TA, et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer. 2009;115(22):5218–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lardinois D, Suter H, Hakki H, Rousson V, Betticher D, Ris HB. Morbidity, survival, and site of recurrence after mediastinal lymph-node dissection versus systematic sampling after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(1):268–74 discussion 74-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Massard G, Ducrocq X, Kochetkova EA, Porhanov VA, Riquet M. Sampling or node dissection for intraoperative staging of lung cancer: a multicentric cross-sectional study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(1):164–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai Y, Su X, Long H, Lin P, Fu J, Zhang L, et al. Survival analysis of 220 patients with completely resected stage-II non-small cell lung cancer. Chinese J Cancer. 2010;29(5):538–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doddoli C, Aragon A, Barlesi F, Chetaille B, Robitail S, Giudicelli R, et al. Does the extent of lymph node dissection influence outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(4):680–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang W, He J, Shen Y, Shen J, He Q, Zhang J, et al. Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population Study of the US SEER Database and a Chinese Multi-Institutional Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(11):1162–70.

  11. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Maddaus MA. Surgical assessment and intraoperative management of mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(3):1059–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishiguro F, Matsuo K, Fukui T, Mori S, Hatooka S, Mitsudomi T. Effect of selective lymph node dissection based on patterns of lobe-specific lymph node metastases on patient outcome in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a large-scale retrospective cohort study applying a propensity score. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(4):1001–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang W, Chen X, Xi J, Wang Q. Selective mediastinal lymphadenectomy without intraoperative frozen section examinations for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: retrospective study of 403 cases. World J Surg. 2013;37(2):392–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Z, Miao J, Chen Q, Fu Y, Li H, Hu B. Assessment of non-lobe-specific lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2019;10(7):1597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Veeramachaneni NK, Battafarano RJ, Meyers BF, Zoole JB, Patterson GA. Risk factors for occult nodal metastasis in clinical T1N0 lung cancer: a negative impact on survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(3):466–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. May M, Herrmann E, Bolenz C, Brookman-May S, Tiemann A, Moritz R, et al. Association between the number of dissected lymph nodes during pelvic lymphadenectomy and cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node–negative urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(7):2018–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Samayoa AX, Pezzi TA, Pezzi CM, Gay EG, Asai M, Kulkarni N, et al. Rationale for a minimum number of lymph nodes removed with non-small cell lung cancer resection: correlating the number of nodes removed with survival in 98,970 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1005–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science (New York, NY). 2006;313(5795):1960–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Galon J, Fridman WH, Pagès F. The adaptive immunologic microenvironment in colorectal cancer: a novel perspective. Cancer Res. 2007;67(5):1883–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ou SH, Zell JA. Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes removed at lobectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(8):880–6. .

  21. Darling GE, Allen MS, Decker PA, Ballman K, Malthaner RA, Inculet RI, et al. Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: results of the randomized, prospective American College of Surgeons oncology group Z0030 trial. Chest. 2011;139(5):1124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saynak M, Hubbs J, Nam J, Marks LB, Feins RH, Haithcock B, et al. Variability in defining T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer impacts locoregional failure and survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):1645–9 discussion 9-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Osarogiagbon RU, Decker PA, Ballman K, Wigle D, Allen MS, Darling GE. Survival implications of variation in the thoroughness of pathologic lymph node examination in American College of Surgeons oncology group Z0030 (Alliance). Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Varlotto JM, Abram R, Margaret N, Flickinger JC, Decamp MM. Extent of lymphadenectomy and outcome for patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2010;115(4):851–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Little AG, Rusch VW, Bonner JA, Gaspar LE, Green MR, Webb WR, et al. Patterns of surgical care of lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2051–6 discussion 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Farjah F, Flum DR, Varghese TK Jr, Symons RG, Wood DE. Surgeon specialty and long-term survival after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(4):995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramirez RA, Wang CG, Miller LE, Adair CA, Berry A, Yu X, et al. Incomplete intrapulmonary lymph node retrieval after routine pathologic examination of resected lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2823–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Subramanian M, McMurry T, Meyers BF, et al. Long-term results for clinical stage IA lung cancer: comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(2):375–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (grant numbers 2019A1515011601, 2019A1515010298)

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wenyu Zhai, Fangfang Duan and Yuzhen Zheng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Wenyu Zhai, Qihang Yan & Junye Wang

  2. VIP Region, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Fangfang Duan

  3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Yuzhen Zheng

  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Shuqin Dai

  5. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Chao Zhou, Chao Zhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Tao Chen

  6. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second People’s Hospital of Shan Tou, Shan Tou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Jianlong Chen

Authors
  1. Wenyu Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fangfang Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuzhen Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qihang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuqin Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jianlong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Junye Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JYW and WYZ designed the study. FFD, YZZ, and WYZ drafted the manuscript. QHY, SQD, TC, and JLC collected and interpreted the data. WYZ carried out the statistical analysis. FFD and YZZ critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junye Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Consent for publication

All patients enrolled in the study signed the consent for publication

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, W., Duan, F., Zheng, Y. et al. Significance of accurate hilar and intrapulmonary lymph node examination and prognostication in stage IA–IIA non-small cell lung cancer, a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Onc 18, 258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02027-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02027-y

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us