Skip to main content

The effects and safety of omega-3 fatty for acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) with omega-3 fatty, yet the results remained inconsistent. Therefore, we attempted this meta-analysis to analyze the role of omega-3 fatty in the treatment of ALI patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed databases from inception date to October 31, 2019, for RCTs that compared the treatment of ALI with or without omega-3 fatty. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted data from the published articles. Summary mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome by fixed- or random-effects model.

Results

Six RCTs with a total of 277 patients were identified, of whom 142 patients with omega-3 fatty acid treatment and 135 patients without omega-3 fatty treatment. Omega-3 fatty treatments significantly improve the PaO2 (MD = 13.82, 95% CI 8.55–19.09), PaO2/FiO2 (MD = 33.47, 95% CI 24.22–42.72), total protein (MD = 2.02, 95% CI 0.43–3.62) in ALI patients, and omega-3 fatty acid treatments reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = − 1.72, 95% CI − 2.84 to − 0.60) and intensive care unit stay (MD = − 1.29, 95% CI − 2.14 to − 0.43) in ALI patients.

Conclusions

Omega-3 fatty can effectively improve the respiratory function and promote the recovery of ALI patients. Future studies focused on the long-term efficacy and safety of omega-3 fatty use for ALI are needed.

Background

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a very common kind of critically ill disease in the clinic, which is caused by various intrapulmonary and external factors such as severe trauma, shock, acidosis, or serious infection [1, 2]. If left untreated, it may progress into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with high mortality [3]. In the past decade, great progress has been made in the management of patients with ALI and ARDS. However, the mortality of ALI/ARDS is still high with a range of 40 to 31% [4, 5]. In addition to infection control, low tidal volume protective lung mechanical ventilation and nutritional treatment of ARDS/ALI play an important role in the treatment strategies [6,7,8], especially the provision of calories by fat nutrition is a key part [9].

At present, the fat emulsions used in clinical practice are mostly based on soybean oil. Soybean oil-based fat emulsions are rich in long-chain fat emulsions, which can affect granulocyte activity under severe stress such as trauma and infection, resulting in impaired immune function and increased lipid peroxidation, which in turn increases organ function damage [10, 11]. This tendency to increase the inflammatory response often makes the use of soybean oil-based fat emulsions in a dilemma clinically. In recent years, omega-3 fatty acids have attracted much attention due to their ability to reduce inflammation and regulate immunity. It has been reported [12, 13] that it can inhibit inflammation and regulate immunity in many diseases. It has good effects in the treatment of severe patients such as sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome [14, 15]. Compared to traditional fat emulsions, omega-3 fatty shows its superiority in nutritional therapy for critically ill patients [16]. However, the studies on the effects of omega-3 fatty for the treatment of ALI are still lacking.

Based on literature review, we have found that there are several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on the omega-3 fatty in the treatment of ALI, yet the results have remained inconsistent. Furthermore, there are very few related meta-analyses on the role of omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of ALI; further investigations are needed. Therefore, we attempted to conduct this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omega-3 fatty in the treatment of ALI, to provide insights into the clinical management of ALI.

Methods

We attempted to conduct and report this meta-analysis in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [17].

Literature search

Relevant RCTs on the role of omega-3 fatty in the treatment of ALI were screened and identified. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for relevant trials published in English or Chinese up to October 31, 2019. The following search terms were used: “omega-3; fish oil; ω-3; acute lung injury; ALI; acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARDS.” We adopted those search terms with combined Boolean operators “AND” or “OR” in every database. Besides, relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses from those databases were identified, and their bibliographies were scrutinized for further relevant trials, as were those of the RCTs included in the review.

Eligibility criteria

Two investigators independently reviewed the identified articles. The inclusion criteria for RCTs were as follows: (1) RCT design, (2) comparative analysis of ALI treatment with or without omega-3 fatty, and (3) the details of omega-3 fatty treatment and related outcomes were reported. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case reports, reviews, editorial comments, meeting abstracts, and articles without applicable data; (2) studies with insufficient data, such as missing the standard deviation (SD); and (3) considerable overlaps between the authors and research centers among the published literature.

Study selection

The search results were imported into the software of Endnote X7 for literature management. Two authors independently reviewed the title, abstract, or descriptors of the identified studies and excluded the studies that clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria. After excluding duplicate and apparently irrelevant studies, the full text of the remaining studies was reviewed to assess eligibility for inclusion. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion or by asking an independent third opinion.

Data collection

Two authors independently extracted the data from each study with a standardized data extraction checklist, which included the study characteristics (e.g., first author’s name, publication year, journal, country where the study was conducted), characteristics of included study subjects (e.g., number of participants, age, gender distribution), details of omega-3 fatty treatment intervention, outcome variables (e.g., follow-up period), and study conclusion. Outcomes were extracted preferentially by intention to treat (ITT) at the end of follow-up. Quantitative data were extracted to calculate effect sizes. Data on effect size that could not be obtained directly were recalculated whenever possible or contacted the original authors for data. Any discrepancy was resolved by further consensus.

Risk of bias assessment

Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies for major potential sources of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, which includes the method of random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other sources of bias. We evaluated the methodological quality of every included RCT by rating each criterion as low, high, or unclear risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved through further discussion whenever necessary.

Statistical analysis

The Review Manager Version 5.3 software was used for data analysis. All the data syntheses and interpretations were also performed by two authors independently to ensure the accuracy of the results. Binary outcomes were presented as Mantel–Haenszel-style odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs). A fixed-effect model was adopted in cases of homogeneity (P value of χ2 test > 0.10 and I2 < 50%), whereas a random-effect model was used in cases of obvious heterogeneity (P value of χ2 test > 0.10 and I2 ≥ 50%). Publication bias was evaluated by using funnel plots, and asymmetry was assessed by conducting Egger regression test. The statistical significance level was 0.05 in this present study.

Results

Study selection

Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of study selection. The electronic searches identified 111 literatures, and 80 reports were clearly not relevant after the first screening. The full text of 21 studies was retrieved for further in-depth consideration, and 15 studies were excluded for several reasons: 12 studies were not RCT, 2 studies were with inappropriate intervention, and 1 study was a low-quality report. Finally, 6 RCTs [18,19,20,21,22,23] were included in this meta-analysis. References cited in published original and review papers were examined, and no further studies were found.

Fig. 1
figure1

The flow chart of study selection

Characteristics of included RCTs

The characteristics of RCTs included in this present meta-analysis are presented in Table 1. Of these included studies, one was performed in India [23], and the rest of the five studies in China [18,19,20,21,22]. The combined sample size across the 6 included studies was 277 participants, with 142 ALI patients with omega-3 fatty treatment and 135 patients without omega-3 fatty acid treatment. The patient samples in the included studies were different with a range of 34 to 61. For study results, one study did not support the use of omega-3 fatty in ALI patients, whereas the other studies all favored the use of omega-3 fatty in the treatment of ALI.

Table 1 The characteristics of the included RCTs

Methodological quality of the included studies

Figures 2 and 3 show the quality assessment of the studies in this present meta-analysis. All 6 included studies were randomized, but only two RCTs [21, 23] specified the method of randomization. All the RCTs did not report whether any allocation concealment process was used. Four RCTs [20,21,22,23] reported the design on blinding patients, personnel, and outcome assessors. No other significant biases among the included RCTs were found. Intention to treat (ITT) was performed for all patients.

Fig. 2
figure2

Risk of bias graph

Fig. 3
figure3

Risk of bias summary

Outcomes

The changes of PaO2

Three RCTs [19, 20, 22] reported the changes of PaO2 for ALI patients with or without omega-3 fatty acid treatment; the pooled data from the three RCTs revealed that the omega-3 fatty acid treatments significantly improve the PaO2 in ALI patients (MD = 13.82, 95% CI 8.55–19.09, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Forest plot for the changes of PaO2

The changes of PaO2/FiO2

Five RCTs [18,19,20,21,22] reported the changes of PaO2/FiO2 for ALI patients with or without omega-3 fatty treatment; the pooled data from the five RCTs revealed that the omega-3 fatty acid treatments significantly improve the PaO2/FiO2 in ALI patients (MD = 33.47, 95% CI 24.22–42.72, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

Forest plot for the changes of PaO2/FiO2

The changes of total protein

Three RCTs [18, 21, 22] reported the changes of TP for ALI patients with or without omega-3 fatty treatment; the pooled data from the three RCTs revealed that the omega-3 fatty acid treatments significantly increase the TP in ALI patients (MD = 2.02, 95% CI 0.43–3.62, P = 0.01, I2 = 30%; Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

Forest plot for the changes of TP

The duration of mechanical ventilation

Three RCTs [21,22,23] reported the duration of MV for ALI patients with or without omega-3 fatty treatment; the pooled data from the three RCTs revealed that the omega-3 fatty acid treatments significantly reduced the duration of MV in ALI patients (MD = − 1.72, 95% CI − 2.84 to − 0.60, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%; Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure7

Forest plot for the duration of MV

The length of ICU stay

Three RCTs [21,22,23] reported the length of ICU stay for ALI patients with or without omega-3 fatty acid treatment; the pooled data from the three RCTs revealed that the omega-3 fatty acid treatments significantly reduced the length of ICU stay in ALI patients (MD = − 1.29, 95% CI − 2.14 to − 0.43, P = 0.003, I2 = 59%; Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure8

Forest plot for the length of ICU stay

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

No subgroup analyses were performed in our study because the heterogeneity among the included RCTs in the synthesized results remained small. We attempted to evaluate publication bias by using a funnel plot if 10 or more RCTs were included [24]. However, the number of included RCTs was only six; we could not evaluate publication bias by using a funnel plot. Sensitivity analyses, which investigate the influence of one study on the overall risk estimate by removing one study in each turn, suggested that the overall risk estimates were not substantially changed by any single study.

Discussion

Patients with ALI are in a state of high metabolism, and it is necessary to provide nutritional support [25]. Besides, the nutritional support of critically ill patients should fully consider the tolerance of the damaged organ; critically ill patients should start EN as soon as the conditions permit [25]. It has been reported that early EN support improves immune function and protein levels in ARDS patients, which may reduce mortality and shorten the duration of MV and ICU stay [26]. With six RCTs included, the results of this present meta-analysis have indicated that omega-3 fatty acids significantly improve the PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 increase the TP level, and reduce the length of MV and ICU stay for ALI patients. Therefore, the use of omega-3 fatty acids is a promising and effective treatment strategy for ALI.

The potential mechanism of omega-3 fatty acids for ALI treatment should be considered. A number of studies [27,28,29] have found that omega-3 fatty acids can regulate the synthesis of lipid mediators, release cytokines, and activate white blood cells and endothelial cells, thereby regulating the body’s excessive inflammatory response to reduce the lung inflammation. Moreover, it is possible that omega-3 fatty acids increase the patient’s PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 to improve the patient’s respiratory function. Furthermore, omega-3 fatty acids can reduce the concentration of IL-8, leukotriene, and neutrophils in the bronchial lavage fluid of patients, and reduce alveolar permeability, thereby improving patients’ gas exchange [30, 31]. Meanwhile, it not only provides energy as a nutrient-supporting substance and maintains nitrogen balance, but also reduces insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia [32]. However, the potential risks of omega-3 fatty acid use should also be concerned. Two included RCTs [21, 22] reported the adverse events after the use of omega-3 fatty, mainly diarrhea, bloating, and gastric contents reflux. It can be related to that after long-term or unreasonable use of antibiotics, the intestinal flora is dysfunctional, which can easily lead to diarrhe a[33]. And it is possible that the nutrient solution temperature is too low [34]. The occurrence of diarrhea is negatively associated with the serum protein levels [35]. Attention should be paid to the speed of infusion; the temperature of the nutrient solution should also be appropriate.

The pathological feature of ALI is pulmonary edema caused by increased pulmonary capillary permeability; the pathological basis of which is neutrophil-mediated local inflammatory response in the lung [36]. Pathophysiological changes were mainly due to increased Qs/Qt and imbalance of ventilation/blood flow ratio [37]. The application of omega-3 fatty acids not only can quickly reduce the inflammatory reaction of lung tissue, but also can transform LTB4, which aggravates inflammatory reaction, into LTB5 series, which is less active, thereby significantly reducing pulmonary edema, improving the pulmonary vascular permeability [38,39,40]. Besides, as specific immunonutrients, omega-3 fatty can regulate the activity of lipid mediators, cytokines, and endothelial cell, thereby regulating the excessive inflammatory response of the body under infection and trauma [41]. Given all this together, the use of omega-3 fatty may be a useful adjuvant therapy for ALI patients.

The limitations existed in this study must be considered. Firstly, the number of RCTs included in this study is too small, and five out of six RCTs were from China, and the representativeness is poor. Secondly, the potential risk of bias in the allocation concealment process, blinding of researchers, and blinding of outcome assessments must be considered since the information on those issues remains unclear; omega-3 fatty treatment was associated with the reduced days of ICU for ALI patients, but the result should be taken cautiously. Further studies with strict design are needed. Thirdly, no relevant economic indicators were reported among included RCTs; thus, we could not perform analysis on this issue. Future clinical trials should focus on collecting and reporting relevant economic data to evaluate the cost of omega-3 fatty acid treatment. And the selected indicators should reflect the purpose of the study as much as possible with longer follow-up period.

In conclusion, as a kind of nutritional preparation, omega-3 acids can improve the respiratory function and respiratory status of ALI patients by increasing PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2. Meanwhile, it can increase the TP level, and reduce the length of MV and ICU stay of ALI patients. Therefore, omega-3 fatty may be a potential effective and safe strategy for the ALI treatment. Future larger-scale RCTs are needed to further evaluate the timing and dosage of omega-3 fatty application in ALI treatment.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

ALI:

Acute lung injury

OR:

Odds ratios

MD:

Mean differences

CI:

Confidence intervals

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CNKI:

China National Knowledge Infrastructure

CBM:

China Biomedical Literature Database

ITT:

Intention to treat

TP:

Total protein

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

References

  1. 1.

    Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roubinian NH, Triulzi DJ. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload and transfusion-related acute lung injury: etiology and prevention. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2019;33(5):767–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gossman W, Peniston Feliciano HL, Mahapatra S: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In: StatPearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL); 2019.

  4. 4.

    Erickson SE, Martin GS, Davis JL, Matthay MA, Eisner MD, Network NNA. Recent trends in acute lung injury mortality: 1996-2005. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1574–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Spragg RG, Bernard GR, Checkley W, Curtis JR, Gajic O, Guyatt G, et al. Beyond mortality: future clinical research in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(10):1121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mokra D, Mikolka P, Kosutova P, Mokry J: Corticosteroids in acute lung injury: the dilemma continues. Int J Mol Sci 2019, 20(19).

  7. 7.

    Dushianthan A, Cusack R, Burgess VA, Grocott MP, Calder PC. Immunonutrition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1:CD012041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen JJ, Deng JS, Huang CC, Li PY, Liang YC, Chou CY, et al. P-Coumaric-acid-containing adenostemma lavenia ameliorates acute lung injury by activating AMPK/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling and improving the anti-oxidant response. Am J Chin Med. 2019:1–24.

  9. 9.

    Stapleton RD, Martin TR, Weiss NS, Crowley JJ, Gundel SJ, Nathens AB, et al. A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(7):1655–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    King HM, Cosslett AG, Thomas CP, Price-Davies R. A HPLC method to monitor the occurrence of lipid peroxidation in intravenous lipid emulsions used in parenteral nutrition using in-line UV and charged aerosol detection. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018;28:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fell GL, Anez-Bustillos L, Dao DT, Baker MA, Nandivada P, Cho BS, et al. Alpha-tocopherol in intravenous lipid emulsions imparts hepatic protection in a murine model of hepatosteatosis induced by the enteral administration of a parenteral nutrition solution. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0217155.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baker MA, Cho BS, Anez-Bustillos L, Dao DT, Pan A, O'Loughlin AA, et al. Fish oil-based injectable lipid emulsions containing medium-chain triglycerides or added alpha-tocopherol offer anti-inflammatory benefits in a murine model of parenteral nutrition-induced liver injury. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(4):1038–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kristine Koekkoek W, Panteleon V, van Zanten AR. Current evidence on omega-3 fatty acids in enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2019;59:56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Parikh R, Bates JHT, Poynter ME, Suratt BT, Parsons PE, Kien CL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of omega-3 fatty acids in patients with severe sepsis compared with healthy volunteers: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2019.

  15. 15.

    Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):48–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Klek S. Omega-3 fatty acids in modern parenteral nutrition: a review of the current evidence. J Clin Med. 2016;5(3):34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dai F, Zhao Z. Application of enteral nutrient solution rich in omega-3 fatty acids in patients with ARDS. Mod Pract Med. 2009;21(6):588–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shen Y, Shi X. Therapeutic effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid on acute lung injury. Chin J Microecol. 2010;22(7):640–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shen Y, Shi X, Wu A. Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on plasma TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in patients with acute lung injury. Strait Pharm J. 2011;23(6):251–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang R, Gao D, Gong W, Xu L, Liu C. Lung protection of omega-3 fatty acids in elderly patients with acute lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation. Med J Clin Res. 2011;28(8):1478–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhao Z, Dai F, He G, Luo W. Lung protection of omega-3 fatty acids in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation. Parent Enteral Nutr. 2010;17(5):266–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gupta A, Govil D, Bhatnagar S, Gupta S, Goyal J, Patel S, et al. Efficacy and safety of parenteral omega 3 fatty acids in ventilated patients with acute lung injury. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15(2):108–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Turner KL, Moore FA, Martindale R. Nutrition support for the acute lung injury/adult respiratory distress syndrome patient: a review. Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26(1):14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Raghavendran K, Napolitano LM. ALI and ARDS: challenges and advances. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27(3):xiii–xiv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Scorletti E, Byrne CD. Omega-3 fatty acids and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: evidence of efficacy and mechanism of action. Mol Asp Med. 2018;64:135–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abdelhamid AS, Brown TJ, Brainard JS, Biswas P, Thorpe GC, Moore HJ, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD003177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lee HJ, Han YM, An JM, Kang EA, Park YJ, Cha JY, et al. Role of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in preventing gastrointestinal cancers: current status and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(12):1189–203.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    He GZ, Dong LG, Cui XY, Chen XF. Zhang R: [impact of glutamine and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on intestinal permeability and lung cell apoptosis during intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;15(5):484–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    He GZ, Dong LG, Chen XF, Zhou KG, Shu H. Lymph duct ligation during ischemia/reperfusion prevents pulmonary dysfunction in a rat model with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and glutamine. Nutrition. 2011;27(5):604–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zayed EA, AinShoka AA, El Shazly KA. Abd El Latif HA: improvement of insulin resistance via increase of GLUT4 and PPARγ in metabolic syndrome-induced rats treated with omega-3 fatty acid or l-carnitine. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2018;32(11):e22218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guo Q, Goldenberg JZ, Humphrey C, El Dib R, Johnston BC. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD004827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pitta MR, Campos FM, Monteiro AG, Cunha AGF, Porto JD, Gomes RR. Tutorial on diarrhea and enteral nutrition: a comprehensive step-by-step approach. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019;43(8):1008–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hod K, Sperber AD, Maharshak N, Ron Y, Shapira I, David Z, et al. Serum cholinesterase activity is elevated in female diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome patients compared to matched controls. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(12):e13464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Qu L, Chen C, Chen Y, Li Y, Tang F, Huang H, et al. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and autophagy in acute lung injury (ALI): a review. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:1828–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gouda MM, Bhandary YP. Acute lung injury: IL-17A-mediated inflammatory pathway and its regulation by curcumin. Inflammation. 2019;42(4):1160–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gammone MA, Riccioni G, Parrinello G, D’ Orazio N. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: benefits and endpoints in sport. Nutrients. 2018;11(1):46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rutting S, Xenaki D, Lau E, Horvat J, Wood LG, Hansbro PM, et al. Dietary omega-6, but not omega-3, polyunsaturated or saturated fatty acids increase inflammation in primary lung mesenchymal cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2018;314(6):L922–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gutierrez-Delgado RI, Barraza-Villarreal A, Escamilla-Nunez C, Hernandez-Cadena L, Garcia-Feregrino R, Shackleton C, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation during pregnancy on lung function in preschoolers: a clinical trial. J Asthma. 2019;56(3):296–302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Xu QL, Cai C, Qi WW, Xia ZG. Tang YZ: [influence of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on inflammation-related parameters in lung tissue of rats with severe scald]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2011;27(5):358–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZH, JZ and Y H designed the research; ZH, JZ, WH, MY, LH, RJ, XH, HF and HC conducted the research; ZH, JZ, HY, WS and XH analyzed the data; ZH wrote the first draft of the manuscript; and ZH, JZ and YH had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuancheng Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

None.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Zheng, J., Huang, W. et al. The effects and safety of omega-3 fatty for acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Onc 18, 235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01916-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Omega-3 fatty
  • Acute lung injury
  • Treatment
  • Meta-analysis
  • Review