Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access

Cervical spine giant cell bone tumor: a case report

World Journal of Surgical Oncology201917:82

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1625-5

  • Received: 14 December 2018
  • Accepted: 2 May 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the bone are locally aggressive primary bone tumors with a benign character. Spinal involvement is rare and they are quite rare in the cervical spine.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old male patient presented with neck pain. Cervical CT revealed a lytic lesion extending posteriorly and causing the collapse of the C4 vertebra corpus. The patient underwent excision of the tumor extending from the anterior to the posterior with a single-stage anterior intervention followed by the placement of an anterior cage and plate-screw system for fusion. The pathology was reported as GCT.

Conclusions

The posteriorly located lesion was widely curetted through an anterior approach in a single session.

Keywords

  • Giant cell tumor
  • Cervical spine
  • Corpectomy

Background

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the bone are locally aggressive primary tumors with a benign character involving the metaphysis of long bones. The tumor develops after physeal closure and causes pathological fractures. The incidence in the spinal cord varies between 1.4% and 9.4% and the most common spinal location is the sacrum. The incidence in the cervical spine is quite low [1, 2]. Primary GCTs in cervical spine constitute 2–3% of all spinal tumors [3, 4]. It is more common in females than males and in the third and fourth decades. The symptom is tenderness in the tumor region. Vertebral GCTs can cause a neurological deficit by growing inside and compressing the spinal canal [5]. Giant cell tumors of the bone are radiologically osteolytic and destructive lesions. The preferred treatment for GCTs is wide en bloc resection but spinal GCTs may not be able to be resected en bloc due to the risk of vascular or neural injury [6, 7]. Common treatment option for spinal GCTs is curettage but if the tumor is removed incompletely, local recurrence and/or metastasis is usually seen [8].

Case report

A 31-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with symptoms of neck pain, back pain (pain in the lower cervical and upper thoracic region), and numbness in both arms for the last 3 months. His physical examination revealed hypoesthesia at the C4 and C5 dermatomes in both arms with no loss of strength. Cervical computed tomography (CT) showed a destructive and compressive lesion in the C4 vertebra corpus (Fig. 1). The retropulsion caused by compression had narrowed the canal. The lesion was also seen to be completely wrapped around the vertebral foramen at the right C4 level and to extend to the lateral mass posteriorly in the axial sections on CT (Fig. 2). Weinstein, Boriani, Biagini (WBB) classification was used for the classification of the tumor (Fig. 3) [1]. In this case, the tumor was located at the regions 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and invaded all the layers except the dura mater. Corpectomy was performed to the C4 vertebra with an anterior approach together with discectomy to the upper and lower disc spaces during surgery. The lesion was seen to extend to the right C4 vertebral foramen in the surgical observation after corpectomy, and the tumor was carefully dissected 360° around the vertebral artery at this level. Once the vertebral artery was revealed, we entered between the mass extending posteriorly to the lateral mass, the spinal cord, and the vertebral artery and performed meticulous intracavitary curettage. In order to ensure stability after tumor excision, the upper and lower corpus endplates were decorticated with the curette. A corpectomy cage was placed into the C4 space, and the system was fixed by placing a plate screw on the upper and lower vertebra from the anterior (Fig. 4). There was no additional neurological deficit postoperatively. The patient’s neurological complaints improved during the postoperative period. There was no residual or remaining tumor after resection. The pathological microscopical evaluation revealed a tumor rich in osteoclastic multinuclear giant cells interspersed in a stroma composed of cells with oval-fusiform nuclei. The pathological diagnosis was giant cell tumor of the bone (Fig. 5a, b). No recurrence was seen during 3 years of follow-up (Fig. 6).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Lytic lesion in C4 vertebral corpus on CT in the sagittal plane

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Lesion extending from the vertebra corpus to the lateral mass on CT in the axial plane

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Weinstein, Boriani, Biagini (WBB) classification is divided into 12 sections with the central cord as the center, in a clockwise direction, starting from the spinous processes. The first region is the spinous process, the sixth region is the anterior vertebral corpus, and the 12th region is the right spinous process: (A) surrounding soft tissue, (B) intraosseous, (C) involving the vertebral canal, (D) located in the epidural space, (E) dura involvement, and (F) vertebral artery involvement

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

C4 corpectomy, corpectomy cage, and C3–5 anterior plate-screw image on postoperative CT in the sagittal plane

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a, b Pathology figure. Osteoclastic multinuclear giant cells (arrowheads) interspersed in a stroma composed of cells with oval-fusiform nuclei (stars). (Hematoxylin and eosin, × 200, × 400 magnification, respectively)

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

No recurrence was seen on the direct X-ray taken in the postoperative third year

Discussion

GCTs are rare tumors and are quite rare in the cervical spine. Various treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, embolization, cryotherapy, and chemical adjuvants are used for spinal GCTs. Denosumab has been used in adjuvant therapy in recent years [9]. The aim of the treatment is to remove the tumor and prevent its recurrence while avoiding neurological structure damage and spinal integrity deterioration [1013]. Although total en bloc resection is the best treatment method, it may not be possible as in other long bones due to reasons such as spinal cord injury during surgery, large vessel injury (thoracic aorta in the upper thoracal region, between T1–T4, ductus thoracicus and vertebral artery in the cervical region) due to blunt dissection, excessive bleeding, development of instability due to spinal osteotomies, and contamination during removal of the tumor cells, especially in the peduncle [14, 15]. Good results were reported with en bloc resection to decrease local recurrence in vertebral tumors by Boriani et al. [16]. Martin et al. recommended preoperative embolization followed by lesion resection for big lesions and en bloc resection in appropriate cases [10]. Although Marcove et al. [17] reported good results with cryotherapy, Leggon et al. [18] encountered a high local recurrence rate of 62% with cryotherapy followed by curettage. Radiotherapy (RT) is an option to decrease postoperative recurrence in GCTs. However, discussion continues on the development of myelopathy and sarcoma due to radiotherapy [19, 20]. Yang et al. reported sarcomatous changes in one of their three cases following postoperative RT [13]. RT should therefore mostly be reserved for recurring lesions [8, 13].

Curettage can be used for small lesions limited to the anterior cervical column, and anterior stabilization can be used for lesions limited to the vertebral corpus in cervical spine GCTs [11, 21, 22]. Surgery is performed in two stages as anterior and posterior for cases undergoing large excision. Anterior and posterior fusion is used to prevent instability after the excision [21, 23].

It is difficult to predict the prognosis in GCT cases as the recurrence rate is 11–50% even with the best treatment method of en bloc resection [8, 1012, 24]. Local recurrences are most commonly seen in the first 3 years [8]. The local recurrence rate is 22–42% for all cases, but spinal GCT recurrence rates are from small series as spinal involvement by this disorder is rare [11, 25]. There is also no definite treatment scheme. Although our case had a cervical spine lesion extending posteriorly from the corpus, the vertebral corpus lesion was removed en bloc with a pure anterior approach and the lateral mass extension was excised with intracavitary curettage. A second surgery was therefore not required. Since radiotherapy use in the postoperative period is controversial, we decided not to administer radiotherapy to the patient after consulting with the radiation oncology department.

Conclusions

In this case, the posteriorly located lesion was widely curetted through an anterior approach in a single session. The patient did not experience any recurrence during the 3 years of follow-up.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The authors declare no financial support.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

İS analyzed the patient’s data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. MK assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. UPH contributed to the manuscript by adding pathological photomicrographs. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

The patient has given written informed consent to use her medical history including radiology in the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Yeni Yüzyıl University Medical Faculty, Merkez Mahallesi,Çukurçeşme Caddesi No:51, Gaziosmanpaşa, İstanbul, Turkey
(2)
Department of Pathology, Yeni Yüzyıl University Medical Faculty, Merkez Mahallesi, Çukurçeşme Caddesi No:51, Gaziosmanpaşa, İstanbul, Turkey

References

  1. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Casadei R, Boriani L, Donthineni R, Gasbarrini A, Pignotti E, Biagini R, Schwab JH. Giant cell tumor of the mobile spine: a review of 49 cases. Spine. 2012;37:E37–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182233ccd.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Junming M, Cheng Y, Dong C, Jianru X, Xinghai Y, Quan H, Wei Z, Mesong Y, Dapeng F, Wen Y, Bin N, Lianshun J, Huimin L. Giant cell tumor of the cervical spine: a series of 22 cases and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(3):280–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318162454f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lorenzo ND, Delfini R, Ciappetta P, Cantore G, Fortuna A. Primary tumors of the cervical spine: surgical experience with 38 cases. Surg Neurol. 1992;38:12–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Shirakuni T, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S, Fujiwara M. Giant cell tumor in cervical spine. Surg Neurol. 1985;23:148–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Öztop F. Omurga tümörlerinin patolojisi. In: Zileli M, Özer AF, editors. Omurilik ve Omurga cerrahisi, cilt 2. İzmir: Meta Basım Matbaacılık Hizmetleri; 2002. p. 957–74.Google Scholar
  6. Dahlin DC. Giant-cell tumor of vertebrae above the sacrum : a review of 31 cases. Cancer. 1977;39:1350–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim S, Kim Y, You S, Kim S, Park I, Baik M. The trend of treatment for giant cell tumors of the spine in recent years. Age. 2003;30:68.Google Scholar
  8. Fidler MW. Surgical treatment of giant cell tumours of the thoracic and lumbar spine: report of nine patients. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakazawa T, Inoue G, Imura T, Miyagi M, Saito W, Namba T, Shirasawa E, Uchida K, Takahira N, Takaso M. Remarkable regression of a giant cell tumor of the cervical spine treated conservatively with denosumab: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;24:22–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin C, McCarthy EF. Giant cell tumor of the sacrum and spine: series of 23 cases and a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:69–75.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Sanjay BK, Sim FH, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Klassen RA. Giant-cell tumours of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:148–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Thangaraj R, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Stirling AJ, Spilsbury J, Spooner D. Giant cell tumour of the spine sacrum: a suggested algorithm for treatment. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(7):1189–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1270-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang SC, Chen LH, Fu TS, Lai PL, Niu CC, Chen WJ. Surgical treatment for giant cell tumor of the thoracolumbar spine. Chang Gung Med J. 2006;29(1):71–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Su YP, Chen WM, Chen TH. Giant-cell tumors of bone: an analysis of 87 cases. Int Orthop. 2004;28:239–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0564-z.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Toribatake Y. The effect of total en bloc spondylectomy on spinal cord circulation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1993;67:1070–80.Google Scholar
  16. Boriani S, Biagini R, De Iure F, Di Fiore M, Gamberini G, Zanoni A. Lumbar vertebrectomy for the treatment of bone tumors: surgical technique. Chir Organi Mov. 1994;79:163–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcove RC, Sheth DS, Brien EW, Huvos AG, Healey JH. Conservative surgery for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. The role of cryosurgery as a supplement to curettage and partial excision. Cancer 1994;74(4):1253–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Leggon RE, Zlotecki R, Reith J, Scarborough MT. Giant cell tumor of the pelvis and sacrum: 17 cases and analysis of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423(1):196–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Feigenberg SJ, Marcus RB Jr, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, Berrey BH, Enneking WF. Radiation therapy for giant cell tumors of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:207–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Miszczyk L, Wydmanski J, Spindel J. Efficacy of radiotherapy for giant cell tumor of bone: given either postoperatively or as sole treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol BioI Phys. 2001;49:1239–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mattei TA, Ramos E, Rehman AA, Shaw A, Patel SR, Mendel E. Sustained long-term complete regression of a giant cell tumor of the spine after treatment with denosumab. Spine J. 2014;14:e15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen G, Li J, Li X, Fan H, Guo Z, Wang Z. Giant cell tumor of axial vertebra: surgical experience of five cases and a review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0438-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshioka K, Kawahara N, Murakami H, Demura S, Kawaguchi M, Oda M, Matsumoto I, Tomita K. Cervicothoracic giant cell tumor expanding into the superior mediastinum: total excision by combined anterior-posterior approach. Orthopedics. 2009;32:531. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090527-26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zileli M, Isik HS, Ogut FE, Is M, Cagli S, Calli C. Aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(3):593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2510-x. View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu W, Li X, Huang W, Wang Y, Han S, Chen S, Xu L, Yang X, Liu T, Xiao J. Factors affecting prognosis of patients in a single center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):804–10. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2707-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement