Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Beclin-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 3 and
  • 1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201816:170

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1465-8

  • Received: 20 January 2018
  • Accepted: 3 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The abnormal expression of Beclin-1 has recently been investigated in a variety of tumors. However, previous studies have obtained contradicting results regarding the clinical and prognostic value of Beclin-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic value of Beclin-1 and its correlations with clinical pathological parameters in HCC.

Methods

Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang and Chinese VIP databases. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) to estimate the quality of the involved studies.

Results

Ten eligible studies with 1086 HCC patients were included in this study. Our results showed that decreased Beclin-1 expression in HCC related to histological grade [poor-undifferentiated vs. well-moderate: odds ratio (OR) = 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.65–3.32, P < 0.00001]. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.17–1.75, P = 0.0004) indicated that decreased Beclin-1 expression correlated with poor overall survival (OS).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicated that decreased Beclin-1 expression might relate to poor differentiation and unfavorable outcome in HCC.

Keywords

  • Beclin-1
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Clinicopathological factors
  • Prognosis
  • Meta-analysis

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a principal cause of human cancer death worldwide [1]. Thus far, surgical excision is one of the most effective treatments for HCC [2]. Most early diagnosed HCC patients are treated by surgical excision. However, the post-operative recurrence remains high [3], and the 5-year overall survival (OS) is currently only approximately 18% [4]. Therefore, it is essential to identify an effective biomarker to predict the prognosis of HCC.

Autophagy is an intracellular catabolic process by which cytoplasmic proteins and organelles are delivered to lysosomes and subsequently degraded and recycled [5]. An increasing number of publications have shown that autophagy is closely related to the occurrence and progression of tumors [6]. However, the roles of autophagy in these processes are still controversial. Previous research reported that autophagy might mitigate metabolic stress and increase genomic stability to inhibit tumor development [7]. However, Ma et al. [8] showed that autophagy enhanced the resistance of glioblastoma to chemotherapy. At present, the impact of autophagy in HCC is also a subject of debate [9].

In 1998, Liang et al. [10] identified and cloned the mammalian homolog of yeast Atg6/Vps30 gene, namely, Beclin-1, which is located on human chromosome 17q21. It is a key regulator of autophagy. It induces autophagy by participating in autophagosome formation and endosome maturation, which are major steps of autophagy [11]. Abnormal expression of Beclin-1 was shown to relate to the occurrence and prognosis of breast cancer, gastric cancer, and lymphoma [12]. However, controversial results have been obtained in HCC. Yue et al. [13] found that Beclin-1+/− mice were more prone to develop malignant tumors, including HCC, than wild-type mice. Qiu et al. [14] showed that Beclin-1 expression was correlated with liver cirrhosis, Edmondson grades and vascular invasion. Ding et al. [15] showed that positive Beclin-1 expression was related to favorable outcome in HCC patients, while Wu et al. [16] demonstrated that Beclin-1 expression was not related to prognosis and any clinicopathological factors investigated in HCC. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical and prognostic value of Beclin-1 in HCC.

Methods

Literature search

A systematic literature search was carried out separately by two investigators (Zhiqiang Qin and Xinjuan Yu) in the English databases PubMed and EMBASE and the Chinese databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang and Chinese VIP, with an end date of 30 September 2017. Search terms were “Beclin-1” OR “beclin 1” OR “BECN1” OR “ATG6” AND “hepatocellular” OR “liver” OR “hepatic” AND “carcinoma” OR “tumor” OR “neoplasm” OR “cancer.” In addition, we manually retrieved the references of relevant reviews and the included literatures.

Criteria for inclusion and exclusion

The following inclusion criteria were required for studies to be eligible: (1) were published in English or Chinese, and full-text articles can be retrieved; (2) were retrospective cohort studies; (3) had proven diagnosis of HCC in humans; (4) detected Beclin-1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC); (5) odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on Beclin-1 expression and clinicopathological factors or OS could be obtained. Any study that met the following exclusion criteria was excluded: (1) non-original studies, such as review, case reports, letter to editors, or conference abstracts; (2) laboratory studies, such as studies on animal or cancer cell lines; (3) duplication of previous publications.

Quality assessment

Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), a recommended methodological quality assessment tool, was used to estimate the quality of the eligible literature [17]. Two investigators (Zhiqiang Qin and Xinjuan Yu) conducted the assessment independently. When disagreement occurred, the two investigators had a discussion or the third reviewer (Mei Lin) was recruited until consensus was reached. A study with a score ≥ 6 was graded as a high-quality study and others were graded as low quality [18].

Data extraction

Two investigators (Zhiqiang Qin and Xinjuan Yu) independently extracted data from the included studies. Disagreements regarding data extraction were crosschecked until achieving consensus. The following information were extracted: surname of the first author, publication year, country, number of patients, gender, age range, antibody dilution, evaluation methods, cut-off value, percentage of decreased Beclin-1 expression, histopathological parameters, and HR and 95% CI of Beclin-1 expression for OS. When HR and its 95% CI were not explicitly given in the article, we performed the calculation using data provided by the literature according to the methods reported by Tierney et al. [19].

Statistical analysis

The current study was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [20] (Additional file 1). Pooled ORs and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the associations between Beclin-1 expression and clinicopathological factors. Pooled HR and 95% CI were applied to estimate the effect of Beclin-1 expression on OS. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed by chi-squared test (Q test) and I2 test (range from 0-100%). A P value (Q test) > 0.10 and I2 ≤ 50% indicated no significant heterogeneity. In this case, we used the fixed effect model. When heterogeneity was evident (P value ≤ 0.10 or I2 > 50%), we used the random effect model. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots. All analyses were carried out using Review Manager (version: 5.3, Cochrane Informatics and Knowledge Management Department, http://tech.cochrane.org/revman/download). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Selection of included articles

Six hundred and twenty potential articles were initially retrieved from relevant electronic databases, and 7 articles were obtained from a manual search of references. A total of 200 repeated documents were excluded. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 119 non-original articles, 106 irrelevant articles, and 172 laboratory studies on animals or cell lines were removed. The remaining 30 articles were further investigated by attentively reading the full text. Twenty articles were then excluded due to not fulfilling the inclusion criteria or fulfilling the exclusion criteria. Ultimately, 10 articles with a total of 1086 HCC patients were eligible for further analysis. The selection steps and the reasons for exclusion are summarized in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of study selection

Characteristics and quality assessment of studies

The basic characteristics of the 10 included articles are listed in Table 1. In all, the involved studies consisted of 8 English studies [1416, 2125] and 2 Chinese studies [26, 27]. These studies were published between 2008 and 2016, and the number of participants ranged from 35 to 300. Of the 10 studies, 7 were from China, 2 from Egypt, and 1 from Korea. All the patients included had proven pathological diagnosis of HCC. IHC staining was used to investigate Beclin-1 expression, and immunoreactive score (IRS) was used to assess Beclin-1 expression. The percentage of decreased Beclin-1 expression ranged from 18.52 to 94.21%. Five studies provided information on OS. However, HR and 95% CI could only be obtained in four studies.
Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies

References

Year

Country

No. of patients

Gender (M/F, n)

Age range (years)

Method

Antibody dilution

Counting method

Cut-off staining

Reduced Beclin-1 expression (%)

OS data provided

Ding [15]

2008

China

300

252/48

NR

IHC

1:50

IRS*

10%

205/300 (68.33)

Yes

Kang [21]

2013

China

50

47/3

28–71

IHC

NR

IRS

4

11/50 (22.00)

No

Lee [22]

2013

Korea

190

158/32

29–76

IHC

NR

IRS

6

179/190 (94.21)

Yes

Guo [26]

2013

China

54

39/15

33–75

IHC

1:150

IRS

3

10/54 (18.52)

No

Qiu [14]

2014

China

103

85/18

21–79

IHC

1:100

IRS

8

81/103 (78.64)

Yes

Wu [16]

2014

China

156

143/13

NR

IHC

1:100

IRS

6

83/156 (53.21)

Yes

Osman [23]

2015

Egypt

65

51/14

40–74

IHC

1:100

IRS*

10%

32/65 (49.23)

No

Yang [27]

2015

China

50

39/11

26–74

IHC

NR

IRS

3

11/50 (22.00)

No

Al-Shenawy [24]

2016

Egypt

35

20/15

23–75

IHC

1:350

IRS

1

18/35 (51.43)

No

Zhou [25]

2016

China

83

69/14

NR

IHC

1:100

NR

NR

45/83 (54.22)

Yes

M male, F female, NR not reported, IHC immunohistochemistry, IRS immunoreactive score, IHC expression was evaluated integrating proportion and intensity of positive staining, IRS* IHC expression was evaluated by percent positivity, OS overall survival

The quality of the 10 eligible studies was evaluated by NOS. The scores were all ≥ 6 points (Table 2). This indicated that all the included studies were high-quality studies.
Table 2

Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment

Study

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total

Exposed cohort

Non-exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Outcome of interest

Control for factor

Assessment of outcome

Follow-up long enough

Adequacy of follow-up

score

Ding [15]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Kang [21]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Lee [22]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

 

8

Guo [26]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Qiu [14]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Wu [16]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Osman [23]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Yang [27]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Al-Shenawy [24]

*

*

*

*

**

*

*

*

9

Zhou [25]

*

*

 

*

*

*

*

 

6

*A study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and outcome categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for comparability. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

Beclin-1 expression and clinicopathological parameters

As shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5, decreased Beclin-1 expression was significantly correlated with histological grade (poorly undifferentiated vs. well-moderated: OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.65–3.32, P < 0.00001), with slight heterogeneity (P = 0.22, I2 = 25%). However, decreased Beclin-1 expression was not related to age (older vs. middle aged and youth: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.76–1.35, P = 0.92), gender (male vs. female: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.76–1.63, P = 0.59), liver cirrhosis (positive vs. negative: OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 0.85–3.14, P = 0.14), HBsAg (positive vs. negative: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.45–1.38, P = 0.40), tumor size (> 5 cm vs. ≤ 5 cm: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.88–1.59, P = 0.27), tumor number (multiple vs. solitary: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.77–1.63, P = 0.54), or TNM stage (III–IV vs. I–II: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.72–1.65, P = 0.68). Considerable interstudy heterogeneity was observed in the analyses of the correlation between Beclin-1 expression and liver cirrhosis (P = 0.02, I2 = 57%) or HBsAg (P = 0.08, I2 = 47%). The analyses of Beclin-1 expression and other clinicopathological factors exhibited slight or no heterogeneity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Forest plot of studies assessing the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and a age and b gender

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Forest plot of studies assessing the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and a liver cirrhosis and b HBsAg

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Forest plot of studies assessing the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and a tumor size and b tumor number

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Forest plot of studies assessing the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and a histological grade and b TNM stage

Beclin-1 expression and OS

Four reports that included 642 HCC patients were eligible to investigate the correlation between reduced Beclin-1 expression and OS. As shown in Fig. 6, decreased Beclin-1 expression in HCC was related to poor OS (Beclin-1 low vs. Beclin-1 high: HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.17–1.75, P = 0.0004). There was no heterogeneity in this analysis (P = 0.66, I2 = 0%).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Forest plot of studies assessing the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and OS in HCC patients

Sensitivity analysis

We conduct a sensitivity analysis by excluding one study in turn. In the study of the correlation between Beclin-1 expression and liver cirrhosis, Beclin-1 expression was lower in patients with cirrhosis than in those without cirrhosis (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.04–3.66, P = 0.04) after removing Lee et al.’s study [22], and heterogeneity was still obvious (P = 0.06, I2 = 50%). Except Lee et al.’s study, none of the individual studies evidently impacted the outcomes of the current study.

Subgroup analysis

Remarkable heterogeneity was observed in the meta-analysis of the correlation between Beclin-1 expression and liver cirrhosis or HBsAg. To explore the sources of the heterogeneities, we performed subgroup analysis based on geographic region (Table 3). Beclin-1 was irrelevant to liver cirrhosis of HCC patients from both Asia (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.72–2.25, P = 0.42) and Egypt (OR = 10.03, 95% CI = 0.74–136.23, P = 0.08). Evident heterogeneity existed in Egyptian HCC patients (P = 0.10, I2 = 63%), but not in Asian HCC patients (P = 0.12, I2 = 42%). Beclin-1 was not related to the status of HBsAg in Asian HCC patients (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61–1.34, P = 0.62) with no evident heterogeneity (P = 0.15, I2 = 38%). However, Beclin-1 expression was significantly decreased in Egyptian HBsAg negative HCC patients (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06–0.97, P = 0.04).
Table 3

Subgroup analysis of liver cirrhosis and HBsAg

Subgroups

No. of studies

Pooled OR (95% CI)

P value

Heterogeneity

I 2

P value

Liver cirrhosis

 Asia

6

1.27 (0.72–2.25)

0.42

42%

0.12

 Egypt

2

10.03 (0.74–136.23)

0.08

63%

0.10

HBsAg

 Asia

6

0.91 (0.61–1.34)

0.62

38%

0.15

 Egypt

1

0.24 (0.06–0.97)

0.04

HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Publication bias

Funnel plots of all included studies were symmetrical (Figs. 7 and 8), indicating that there was no significant publication bias present in the current study.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Funnel plot for assessing publication bias of the relationship between Beclin-1 expression and a age, b gender, c liver cirrhosis, and d HBsAg

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Funnel plot for assessing publication bias of the relationship between Beclin-1 expression. a Tumor size. b Tumor number. c Histological grade. d TNM stage. e OS

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Wan Fang, and Chinese VIP were systematically searched, and 10 studies with 1086 HCC patients matched the inclusion criterion. The current study demonstrated that decreased Beclin-1 expression related to poor differentiation in HCC. This was in accordance with Xia et al.’s meta-analysis [28], which showed that reduced Beclin-1 expression was related to poor differentiation in gastric cancer. Consistent with the results obtained in cholangiocarcinoma, bladder, and ovarian cancers [2931], we demonstrated that decreased Beclin-1 expression was associated with unfavorable outcome in HCC patients. These suggested that decreased Beclin-1 might have tumor suppressor function in HCC and indicated that decreased Beclin-1 expression may signify the poor prognosis of HCC. Hence, activation of autophagy may improve the prognosis of HCC patients. Previous studies demonstrated that Beclin-1 downregulated angiogenesis and proliferation of malignant cells [32] and postponed cell cycle progression [33]. In addition, Mathew et al. [34] demonstrated that Beclin-1 could limit genome instability. These may contribute to the tumor suppressor function of Beclin-1. In contrast, other groups discovered that increased Beclin-1 expression was correlated with unfavorable outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma [35], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [36], and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [37]. This discrepancy might be because the role of autophagy on tumor progression was tissue specific.

Significant heterogeneity existed in the analysis of the correlation of Beclin-1 expression and liver cirrhosis or HBsAg. Thus, we performed sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis to discover the sources of the heterogeneities. In sensitivity analysis, Beclin-1 expression was significantly decreased in HCC patients with liver cirrhosis compared to those without liver cirrhosis, but heterogeneity was still obvious after excluding Lee et al.’s study [22]. The rate of decreased Beclin-1 expression was 94.21% in Lee et al.’s study [22], which was higher than the other 7 studies (18.52–78.64%). We hypothesized that the high rate of decreased Beclin-1 expression in Lee et al.’s study might alter the result of analysis. Subgroup analysis based on geographic region showed that Beclin-1 expression was irrelevant to liver cirrhosis of HCC patients from both Asia and Egypt. This suggested that regional difference did not influence the association between Beclin-1 expression and liver cirrhosis in this study. The heterogeneity mainly existed in Egyptian HCC patients. This may be because only two studies from Egypt were involved in this study.

Until now, this study has been the first comprehensive and systematic meta-analysis investigating the clinical and prognostic value of autophagic-related protein Beclin-1 in HCC. This study solved the debate regarding whether Beclin-1 was correlated with clinicopathological factors and prognosis of HCC patients. However, several limitations in this study should be acknowledged. First, although Beclin-1 expression in all of the included reports was detected by IHC, the evaluation methods and cut-off values were diverse. This may be a potential source of heterogeneity. Second, in addition to Beclin-1, other autophagy-related proteins, such as LC3 or Atg-9, can also be investigated to clarify the role of autophagy in HCC. Third, of the 10 included studies, 8 were from Asia and 2 were from Egypt. Studies from other areas were not available. This may cause publication bias and make it difficult to indicate the correlation of Beclin-1 and clinicopathological factors or prognosis among HCC patients from Europe and America. Fourth, studies with positive results are more likely to be published than those reporting negative results. This may also cause publication bias and might potentially contribute to the limited geographical regions involved in the current study. Finally, only four studies were eligible for analyzing the prognostic role of Beclin-1 in the current study. Therefore, more studies are needed to verify the results obtained by the current study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that decreased Beclin-1 expression might relate to poor differentiation and unfavorable outcome in HCC. With regard to the shortcomings of this meta-analysis, we expect studies with larger sample sizes to verify our results.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

CNKI: 

Chinese databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HR: 

Hazard ratio

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

IRS: 

Immunoreactive score

NOS: 

Newcastle-Ottawa scale

OR: 

Odds ratio

OS: 

Overall survival

PRISMA: 

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Declarations

Funding

The study was funded by Shandong Provincial Health Department, China (no. 2016WS0318), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (no. ZR2016HM39), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81702677).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

ML designed the study. ZQQ and JKW retrieved relevant literatures. ZQQ, XJY, and ML extracted data from included studies. JKW, SPM, and NW performed the statistical analysis. ZQQ drafted the manuscript. ML and XJY revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine, Medical College, Qingdao University, No. 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Central Laboratories, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
(3)
Department of Hematology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, 266011, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Shiraha H, Yamamoto K, Namba M. Human hepatocyte carcinogenesis. Int J Oncol. 2013;42:1133–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hanazaki K, Kajikawa S, Shimozawa N, Mihara M, Shimada K, Hiraguri M, et al. Survival and recurrence after hepatic resection of 386 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:381–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schlachterman A, Craft WW Jr, Hilgenfeldt E, Mitra A, Cabrera R. Current and future treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8478–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kulik LM, Chokechanachaisakul A. Evaluation and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 2015;19:23–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000;290:1717–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen P, Cescon M, Bonaldo P. Autophagy-mediated regulation of macrophages and its applications for cancer. Autophagy. 2014;10:192–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Karantza-Wadsworth V, Patel S, Kravchuk O, Chen G, Mathew R, Jin S, et al. Autophagy mitigates metabolic stress and genome damage in mammary tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1621–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ma B, Yuan Z, Zhang L, Lv P, Yang T, Gao J, et al. Long non-coding RNA AC023115.3 suppresses chemoresistance of glioblastoma by reducing autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1864:1393–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee YJ, Jang BK. The role of autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:26629–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Liang XH, Kleeman LK, Jiang HH, Gordon G, Goldman JE, Berry G, et al. Protection against fatal Sindbis virus encephalitis by beclin, a novel Bcl-2-interacting protein. J Virol. 1998;72:8586–96.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:571–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. He Y, Zhao X, Subahan NR, Fan L, Gao J, Chen H. The prognostic value of autophagy-related markers beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein light chain 3B in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:7317–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yue Z, Jin S, Yang C, Levine AJ, Heintz N. Beclin 1, an autophagy gene essential for early embryonic development, is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15077–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Qiu DM, Wang GL, Chen L, Xu YY, He S, Cao XL, et al. The expression of beclin-1, an autophagic gene, in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with clinical pathological and prognostic significance. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:327.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ding ZB, Shi YH, Zhou J, Qiu SJ, Xu Y, Dai Z, et al. Association of autophagy defect with a malignant phenotype and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9167–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu DH, Jia CC, Chen J, Lin ZX, Ruan DY, Li X, et al. Autophagic LC3B overexpression correlates with malignant progression and predicts a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:12225–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:2–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu L, Wu M, Zhao F, Fu W, Li W, Li X, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Gli-1 expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:69087–96.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. w64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang KF, Wang XW, Chen XW, Kang ZJ, Zhang X, Wilbur RR, et al. Beclin 1 and nuclear factor-kappaBp65 are upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:1813–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee YJ, Hah YJ, Kang YN, Kang KJ, Hwang JS, Chung WJ, et al. The autophagy-related marker LC3 can predict prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81540.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Osman NA, Abd El-Rehim DM, Kamal IM. Defective Beclin-1 and elevated hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha expression are closely linked to tumorigenesis, differentiation, and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:4293–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Al-Shenawy HA. Expression of Beclin-1, an autophagy-related marker, in chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma and its relation with apoptotic markers. APMIS. 2016;124:229–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou Y, Wu PW, Yuan XW, Li J, Shi XL. Interleukin-17A inhibits cell autophagy under starvation and promotes cell migration via TAB2/TAB3-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:250–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo XD, Gao YJ, Wan W, Li RS, Zhou YX, Zhao JM, et al. Expression and clinical significance of Beclin 1 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Progress in Modern Biomedicine. 2013;13:85–7.Google Scholar
  27. Yang W, Yang HJ, Mo RX, Li XR, Liao WS, Zhang HM, et al. Expression of Beclin1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma and effects of TGF-β on proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Lab Med. 2015;36:108–9.Google Scholar
  28. Xia P, Wang JJ, Zhao BB, Song CL. The role of beclin-1 expression in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:3303–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang TT, Cao QH, Chen MY, Xia Q, Fan XJ, Ma XK, et al. Beclin 1 deficiency correlated with lymph node metastasis, predicts a distinct outcome in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80317.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu GH, Zhong Q, Ye YL, Wang HB, Hu LJ, Qin ZK, et al. Expression of beclin 1 in bladder cancer and its clinical significance. Int J Biol Markers. 2013;28:56–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cai M, Hu Z, Liu J, Gao J, Liu C, Liu D, et al. Beclin 1 expression in ovarian tissues and its effects on ovarian cancer prognosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:5292–303.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee S, Kim H, Jin Y, Choi A, Ryter S. Beclin 1 deficiency is associated with increased hypoxia-induced angiogenesis. Autophagy. 2011;7:829–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Koneri K, Goi T, Hirono Y, Katayama K, Yamaguchi A. Beclin 1 gene inhibits tumor growth in colon cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:1453–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathew R, Kongara S, Beaudoin B, Karp CM, Bray K, Degenhardt K, et al. Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1367–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang J, Fang Y, Hsi E, Huang Y, Hsu N, Yang W, et al. Immunopositivity of Beclin-1 and ATG5 as indicators of survival and disease recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:5611–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wan X, Fan X, Chen M, Xiang J, Huang P, Guo L, et al. Elevated Beclin 1 expression is correlated with HIF-1alpha in predicting poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Autophagy. 2010;6:395–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ko Y, Cho Y, Won H, Jeon E, An H, Hong S, et al. Prognostic significance of autophagy-related protein expression in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2013;42:829–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement