Open Access

Palliative treatment of pelvic bone tumors using radioiodine (125I) brachytherapy

  • Chongren Wang1,
  • Zhengqi Chen1,
  • Wei Sun2, 3,
  • Yisilamu Yasin4,
  • Chuanyin Zhang5,
  • Xiaojun Ma2,
  • Jian Chen2,
  • Jiakang Shen2,
  • Yingqi Hua2, 3Email author and
  • Zhengdong Cai2, 3Email author
Contributed equally
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201614:294

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1050-y

Received: 25 April 2016

Accepted: 7 November 2016

Published: 25 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Complete resection of pelvic bone tumors, especially recurrent and metastatic ones, is often impossible to achieve using conventional surgery. This study aimed to assess the benefits and adverse effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioiodine (125I) brachytherapy for inoperable recurrent and metastatic bone tumors of the pelvis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 22 patients with confirmed pelvic bone tumors (10 females and 12 males; 15–84 years; 21 with primary pelvic tumor and one with pelvic metastasis). CT-guided 125I brachytherapy was performed using 9–21 125I seeds (radioactivity of 0.5–0.7 mCi). Seed implantation was validated by postoperative CT scanning. Complications, pain, survival, and CT-estimated tumor size were carried out to evaluate the therapeutic benefits.

Results

Postoperative CT scans revealed satisfactory 125I seed implantation, and the radiation dose delivered to 90% of the target area (D90) was higher than the prescription dose (PD). No obvious complications were observed. Pain was reported by 19 of 22 patients, but 17 reported pain relief after implantation. Follow-up ranged 8–27 (median, 19) months. Tumor size was reduced in 11 patients within 1 month after surgery, nine patients showed no change, and tumor size increased in two patients. Finally, 1- and 2-year survival was 81.8 and 45.5%, respectively; 1- and 2-year local tumor control rates were 59.1 and 36.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

125I seed implantation significantly reduced bone tumor size and relieved pain, with a low complication rate. These findings suggest that 125I brachytherapy treatment could be a useful palliative approach for pelvic bone tumor treatment.

Keywords

Pelvic tumor 125I seed Brachytherapy Efficacy Safety

Background

Malignant bone tumors severely affect patient quality of life and are associated with low survival, high disability, recurrence, and mortality. In the 1970s, hemi-pelvic resection was the routine approach for patients with malignant pelvic bone tumor but only achieved a 15% 5-year survival rate. Survival was increased to 50–80% in recent years by applying comprehensive and multidisciplinary treatment strategies such as surgery combined with chemo-radiotherapy [1]. However, despite that surgery is considered as the only curative approach for bone tumors, complete resection of pelvic tumors with conventional surgery is hard to achieve due to the invasiveness of malignant bone tumors and complicated anatomic structure of the pelvis [2, 3]. The local recurrence rate of pelvic tumors is as high as 39.3% after conventional therapy [4, 5], and most patients are not fit enough to undergo a second surgery. In addition, the narrow therapeutic window of conventional chemotherapy drugs makes it difficult to increase the concentrations of drugs within the tumor tissues to improve local tumor control [6].

Brachytherapy, also known as internal radiotherapy, involves a micro-radiation source placed inside or next to a tumor. The maximum effective treatment is achieved by continuous irradiation with low-energy X-rays. A key feature of brachytherapy is localized irradiation, which significantly reduces the probability of unnecessary damage to surrounding healthy tissues [7], as observed in the treatment of various types of cancer [8]. There is no need to ensure adequate exposure of the target area or perform radical resection of the tumor tissue with conventional surgery; therefore, brachytherapy can significantly reduce surgical trauma [9]. 125I is a synthetic low-energy radiation source with short radiation range and a half-life of 60.1 days. It has several advantages such as long half-life, safety, reliability, and low pollution. 125I may cause anti-tumor effects by various mechanisms: (1) induction of tumor cell apoptosis, (2) promotion of tumor cell cycle arrest, (3) interference with tumor cell signal transduction, and (4) prevention of tumor tissue angiogenesis [10]. Grossman et al. first reported the success of 125I brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer, with 5- and 9-year survival rates of 83 and 52%, respectively [11]. Although 125I brachytherapy is used as an effective treatment approach for prostate, digestive tract, lung, liver, and pancreatic cancers, it remains controversial due to local adverse effects such as skin ulceration and skin sinus formation, bladder irritation syndrome, proctitis, rectum ulceration, and prostate rectum fistulae. In addition, peripheral pulmonary emboli can occur if radiation seeds enter the systemic circulation.

Effective brachytherapy for pelvic tumors requires a high level of precision regarding the position and dose of radiation seeds in order to reduce possible adverse effects. Indeed, the complicated anatomical structure, abundant neurovascular networks, and the specific pathological type of pelvic tumor have to be taken into consideration. Probably because of the difficulties associated with pelvic operations, reports regarding 125I brachytherapy for the treatment of pelvic tumors are scarce.

This retrospective study aimed to assess the clinical data of 22 patients who underwent 125I brachytherapy between September 2009 and April 2011 for the palliative treatment of inoperable bone tumors in the pelvis. The computed tomography (CT)-guided 125I brachytherapy procedure was investigated, as well as its therapeutic and adverse effects.

Methods

Patients

This was a retrospective study of all patients with pelvic bone tumor treated with 125I brachytherapy by the Bone Tumor Group, Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital. Twenty-two patients (10 females, 12 males) were assessed, including six patients with chordoma; three with osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor; two with chondrosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and melanoma; and one with leiomyosarcoma, large B cell lymphoma, intermuscular hemangioma, and neurilemmoma. Except for the patient with large B cell lymphoma, the other 21 cases had primary bone and soft tissue malignant tumors after the first conventional surgery, including the patient with melanoma with local recurrence and adjacent pelvic skeleton erosions. All diagnoses were confirmed by experienced pathologists. Patients were 15–84 years of age (median, 43 years). There was no indication of surgery for the pelvic tumors. Nineteen patients complained of various degrees of pain in the pelvis or lower extremities.

125I brachytherapy was carried out with the intent to narrow the resection scope of conventional surgery, reduce recurrence rate, improve the completeness of tumor resection, and preserve organ function. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the tumor proliferated and locally infiltrated the surrounding organs or tissues; (2) the tumor was not easily resectable, due to large major axis length (>6 cm), extension to adjacent vasculature and nerves, and/or no clear margin; (3) isolated recurrent or metastatic bone tumor; (4) need to treat localized residual pelvic cancer after conventional surgery or external radiation therapy; (5) the patient declined conventional surgery or was unfit for conventional surgery; (6) no history of radiotherapy to the pelvis; and (7) the patient accepted brachytherapy using 125I seeds. The exclusion criteria were (1) active tumor bleeding, necrosis, or ulceration; (2) cancer infiltration into a large area or involving a large blood vessel; (3) non-suitability of the patient for radiotherapy, or contraindication to anesthesia; or (4) closeness of large vessels to seed implantation site.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital. The need for individual consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Instrument and reagents

An 18-gauge, 200-mm long puncture needle (Dr. J, Japan) was used for the delivery of the 125I seeds, which were purchased from the China Institute of Atomic Energy (Beijing, China). The 125I seeds were cylindrical (0.8 mm × 0.45 mm) with titanium capsules. The average energy was 27–35 keV, and the radioactivity ranged 0.5–0.7 mCi, with a half-life of about 60 days. Tissue penetration was about 17 mm. The initial dosing was 7 cGy/h. The TPS-200 analysis system was purchased from Hokai Medical Equipment Co. Ltd. (Zhuhai, China).

Preoperative preparation

Each patient underwent thin-layer CT (Brilliance 64, Philips, Best, The Netherlands) 1 week before operation. The planning target volume (PTV) was designed to be a bit larger than the gross tumor volume (GTV), with 1.5-cm outward extension. A three-dimensional planning system (TPS) was used to design the optimal route around functional sensitive regions or organs. Calculations were undertaken for the required numbers of seeds and radioactivity coverage using the Hailar formula, determining the target region of the tumor, implantation site of seeds, and dosage distribution. The Hailar formula used in the current study was Hailar coefficient (Da) = (tumor length + width + height)/3; total activity of the seeds = Da × 5; number of implanted seeds = total activity/individual seed activity. The final number of seeds ranged from 9 to 21, with a median of 4.5.

Implantation

The puncture site was determined under CT guidance. Then, the puncture needle was positioned to the predetermined site and depth after routine disinfection and anesthesia. The radioactive seeds were implanted through the needle and their position was confirmed with a CT scan. The seeds were implanted with a high density at the peripheral site of the target region and relatively sparsely at the center to achieve homogeneous radioactivity distribution. The implanted seeds were distributed in a fan-shape, with approximately 1 cm between each seed. All operations were performed by two orthopedic surgeons (Drs. Xiaojun MA and Chongren Wang), and intraoperative localization was carried out with CT-scan navigation. Radioactivity protections were used during the operation.

Postoperative evaluation

The TPS system was used for postoperative (1 month) evaluation, and a CT scan was performed for each patient. The therapeutic effect was assessed using pain severity, tumor size, survival, and complications. Pain severity was graded according to the WHO standards [12]: grade 0, no pain; grade I, tolerable pain, no obvious effect on sleep or regular daily life; grade II, obvious intolerable pain, seriously interference with sleep, analgesics required; grade III, severe unbearable pain with disrupted sleep, associated with passive positional changes of nerves or functional autonomic nerve disorder. Pain relief outcome was classified as significantly effective (pain severity decreased by two grades or complete pain relief), effective (pain severity decreased by one grade), or invalid (no obvious pain relief or more severe pain) [13]. The KPS and VAS systems were used to assess patient symptoms, quality of life, pain, and disability, before and after treatment. Patients were reexamined by CT 2 months after surgery; the same radiologist assessed each patient before and after operation. Tumor remission was defined according to the following standards [1416]: obvious remission (OR), tumor volume (0.5 × long axis × short axis × short axis) decreased by more than 50%; partial remission (PR), volume decreased by 25–50%; slight remission (SR), volume decreased by less than 25%; no remission (NR), no decrease or increased volume.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) and were analyzed using the paired t test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 17.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Short-term evaluation after radioactive seed implantation

Postoperative CT and TPS evaluation revealed satisfactory 125I seed implantation, with a median radiation dose of 45 cGy (IQR 27.5–85.0 cGy) delivered to 90% of the target area (D90) and surpassing the prescription dose (PD) (D90 > PD). Dose inhomogeneity was no more than 20% PD. In the present study, 19 out of 22 patients showed decreased postoperative tumor volumes (Fig. 1, Table 1), and OR, PR, and SR were achieved in two, 14, and three patients, respectively.
Fig. 1

125I seed distribution and tumor size after brachytherapy. A1, A2, and A3 were obtained before brachytherapy; B1, B2, and B3 were recorded 2 months after brachytherapy. Seeds were evenly distributed within tumors, which were reduced in size after treatment. Obvious remission was observed in B1 and B3 (A1 diameters, 12.5 and 3.7 cm; B1 diameters, 7.3 and 2.1 cm; A3 diameters, 14.7 and 5.2 cm; B3 diameters, 5.6 and 3.3 cm). Partial remission was observed in B2 (A2 diameters, 11.2 and 6.7 cm; B2 diameters, 9.8 and 5.9 cm)

Table 1

Patient characteristics and tumor size pre- and post-125I seed implantation in the 22 patients

    

Pre-implantation tumor characteristics

Post-implantation (1 month) tumor characteristics

Gender

Age

Pathological type

Dose (cGy)

Major axis (cm)

Minor axis (cm)

Volume (cm3)

Major axis (cm)

Minor axis (cm)

Volume (cm3)

M

34

Chordoma

80

16.7

10.2

839.2

14.5

9.1

604.65

M

58

Chordoma

30

10.1

7.9

314.7

6.6

5.2

88

M

58

Chordoma

100

22

14.4

2288

22

14.6

2346.3*

M

84

Chordoma

100

19.1

12.3

1441.7

14.8

11.8

1025.64

F

43

Chordoma

50

8

3.7

54.4

7

3.3

39.2

F

47

Chordoma

30

13.3

6.3

267.9

12.1

4.9

148.1

M

20

GCT

20

8.9

5.6

142

8

5.1

111

M

30

GCT

100

20

11.6

1350

18

9.2

768.6

F

64

GCT

60

6

4.7

67.5

5.8

4

46.4

M

75

Osteosarcoma

70

9.8

3.9

76.3

9.7

3.5

60.5

F

15

Osteosarcoma

80

18

9.6

828

14.7

8.9

582.12

F

20

Osteosarcoma

60

15.6

9.4

683.3

9.7

8.1

494.7

M

39

Chondrosarcoma

30

10.3

6.9

248

9.1

6.1

168

M

46

Chondrosarcoma

20

9.3

6.5

195.3

6.6

5.7

107.1

M

54

Fibrosarcoma

100

20.9

12.7

1681.6

19.7

12

1427.3

F

60

Fibrosarcoma

40

14.4

8.1

474.2

15.3

8.3

523.3*

F

24

Malignant melanoma

30

10.7

7.4

293.9

10

6.5

209

F

50

Malignant melanoma

30

10

7.7

368

9.5

7.5

267

M

39

B-DLCL

20

8.5

5.8

142.8

3.8

2.7

13.4

F

44

Hemangioma

10

7.4

4.6

79.5

6.5

3.9

50.7

M

61

Leiomyosarcoma

100

14.7

12.1

1070

15

13.1

1300.7*

F

16

Mesenchymal neoplasm

10

7.8

3.6

49.2

7.2

3.1

34

n = 22 Median (IQR)

45 (27.5–85.0)

10.5 (8.8–17.0)

7.55 (5.4–10.6)

304.3 (126.4–896.9)

9.7 (6.9–14.9)

6.3 (4.0–9.1)

188.5 (58.05–645.6)

*Tumor progression

Pain

Regional pain was significantly alleviated in all patients after surgery. The VAS scores were significantly decreased at 1 month after implantation compared with the pre-implantation scores (P < 0.05; Table 2), but there was no intergroup difference at 1, 3, or 6 months after implantation (all P > 0.05). Nineteen patients reported pain after surgery, including one patient with grade I pain, eight with grade II, and 10 with grade III. One month after surgery, eight patients experienced significant pain relief, and nine reported effective pain relief, indicating an overall pain relief rate of 89.5%. Three months after implantation, seven patients had significant pain relief, and eight reported effective pain relief, for a pain relief rate of 78.9%. At 6 months after the implantation, four patients experienced significant pain relief, and six had effective pain relief, indicating an overall pain relief rate of 52.6%. Two patients reported complete pain relief until death. The KPS scores were significantly increased at 1 month after implantation compared with the pre-implantation scores (P < 0.05; Table 2). Three months after surgery, KPS scores for pain showed a further relief compared with 1 month post-implantation scores (P < 0.05), but the changes were not significant (P > 0.05) 3 months after seed implantation.
Table 2

Preoperative and postoperative VAS and KPS scores

Evaluation

KPS

VAS

Pre-implantation

44.5 ± 7.2

7.2 ± 1.9

1 month post-implantation*

73.2 ± 7.0

4.7 ± 1.1

3 months post-implantation*

75.0 ± 6.6

3.8 ± 1.2

6 months post-implantation*

75.9 ± 7.2

3.6 ± 1.0

*All values given as mean ± SD, p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative scores

Complications

No complication associated with seed implantation (such as infection, active bleeding, nerve damage, fracture, and bone radiation necrosis) was observed. One patient experienced defecation dysfunction due to tumor progression 4 months after implantation.

Long-term follow-up

Follow-up was 8–27 months, with a median of 19 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 81.8 and 45.5%, respectively (Fig. 2). The main cause of death was multi-organ failure. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 59.1 and 36.4%, respectively (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curve after 125I brachytherapy

Fig. 3

Local tumor control rates after 125I brachytherapy

Discussion

Pelvis bone tumors, either primary or metastatic, often compress the adjacent soft tissues, vessels, and nerves, causing local pain, lower extremity edema, dysfunction, and paralysis. It is often impossible to achieve the radical resection of bone tumors of the pelvis because of the proximity of delicate organs and structures such as the bladder, rectum, sciatic nerve, and blood vessels [17, 18]. Although it is not very clear whether 125I implantation is effective against pelvis bone tumor, some reports have shown the effectiveness of external beam radiotherapy for asymptomatic or ambulatory patients with spinal cord metastases [19]. Brachytherapy has also been shown to be effective and safe in patients with spinal tumors [2022]. Because of similar considerations in terms of delicate surrounding tissues and the risk of iatrogenic injury, the therapeutic approaches to spine and pelvis tumors share some features. Therefore, 125I implantation could be an important treatment modality for the quality of life of patients with pelvic bone tumors.

Radiation therapy is accepted as the first-line treatment for most patients with metastatic spinal tumors [23]. 125I brachytherapy was introduced for the treatment of prostate cancer in 1965 [24, 25]. The application of 125I brachytherapy in the treatment of spinal metastases has been reported with positive therapeutic efficacy [2629]. Therefore, radioactive seeds could be applied for the treatment of pelvic bone tumor. The present study suggested satisfactory therapeutic effects of 125I brachytherapy for the palliative treatment of inoperable recurrent and metastatic pelvic tumors. Accurate implantation of radioactive seeds could be the key to achieving good therapeutic outcomes. A recent study using ablative radiation dose approach showed that CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent anorectal cancer achieved durable tumor control, effective palliation, improved long-term survival, and minimal long-term morbidity [30]. Another study showed that high-dose brachytherapy achieved high local control rates and low toxicity in patients with pelvis tumors that were not readily accessible to other therapies [31]. Taken together, these previous studies and the present study suggest that brachytherapy could achieve high-precision treatment of tumors of the pelvic area, with minimal damage to other organs and tissues.

The low-energy radioactivity released from 125I seeds in a single spot is negatively associated with the squared distance to the position of the seeds; therefore, radioactivity rapidly decreases as the distance increases. The implanted seeds should be evenly distributed and sparse distribution cannot guarantee an effective dosage. Moreover, a too dense distribution is a waste of radioactive material and can cause adverse effects. CT scanning parameters such as thickness, spacing interval, and scanning direction were rigorously identical between the pre- and intra-implantation CT scans to facilitate seed implantation accuracy. Seed numbers and positions were chosen strictly according to the preoperative design, with the puncture route carefully selected to avoid injury to adjacent vessels or organs. This could be associated with the low rate of implantation-induced complications observed in the present study. The puncture angle, depth, and position of the needle tip were also adjusted under CT guidance to ensure implantation safety and accuracy. Post-implantation CT scanning was performed immediately to assess seed distribution and determine possible complications. CT scanning was also used during follow-up to assess the therapeutic effects. The present study showed that tumor size (Fig. 1, Table 1) and pain were significantly reduced, which is supported by a previous study [32]. Furthermore, it was reported that adverse side effects of brachytherapy mainly involve local adjacent organs [3336]. Therefore, CT scanning was performed throughout the whole treatment procedure to ensure implantation accuracy and effectively avoid short- and long-term complications.

In the present study, 1- and 2-year survival rates of 81.8 and 45.5%, respectively, were observed, while the 1- and 2-year local tumor control rates were 59.1 and 36.4%, respectively. These rates are greater than those described for conventional radiotherapy, as reviewed by Lutz et al. [37]. Indeed, external beam radiotherapy for bone tumors has been shown to provide complete pain palliation for 33% of patients, but with acute and late toxicity rates of 10–37 and 1–11%, respectively [37]. In addition, median survival was around 2–4 months [37]. The present study suggests that better outcomes could be achieved with brachytherapy, as supported by previous studies. Indeed, percutaneous 125I seed implantation has been proposed as an alternative or retreatment option for recurrent spinal primary tumors [38]. In addition, this approach was recently described for the treatment of malignant osseous tumors [39].

A few limitations of this study should be mentioned. First, the sample size was small and from a single center, which might affect both the accuracy of our findings and their generalizability. In addition, subdividing the patients into primary and metastatic tumor subgroups was not possible because of the small sample size. Finally, a number of different types of tumors were included, which could bias the results because of different radiosensitivity. Nevertheless, our results provide a basis for the treatment of patients with malignant pelvic bone tumors not treatable by conventional methods.

Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that 125I brachytherapy could be considered a novel minimally invasive palliative treatment for inoperable recurrent and metastatic bone tumors of the pelvis. The procedure is likely to be a useful approach with few adverse effects. However, further multicenter randomized studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

GTV: 

Gross tumor volume

NR: 

No remission

OR: 

Obvious remission

PD: 

Prescription dose

PR: 

Partial remission

PTV: 

Planning target volume

TPS: 

Three-dimensional planning system

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

CRW, ZQC, YQH, and ZDC contributed to the conception and design; CRW, ZQC, WS, YSLM, CYZ, XJM, JC, and JKS contributed to the acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; CRW, ZQC, YQH, and ZDC have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content; all authors have given final approval of the version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital. The need for individual consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
(2)
Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
(3)
Shanghai Bone Tumor Institution
(4)
Department of Spine Surgery, Xinjiang People’s Hospital
(5)
Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital Baoshan Branch Affiliated to Fudan University

References

  1. Sakamoto A, Iwamoto Y. Current status and perspectives regarding the treatment of osteo-sarcoma: chemotherapy. Rev recent clin trials. 2008;3:228–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kitagawa Y, Ek ET, Choong PF. Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour. J orthop surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:155–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jeon DG, Kim MS, Cho WH, Song WS, Lee SY. Reconstruction with pasteurized autograft-total hip prosthesis composite for periacetabular tumors. J surg oncol. 2007;96:493–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Gebhardt MC. Malignant tumors of the pelvis: an outcome study. Clin orthop relat res. 2004;425:212–7.Google Scholar
  5. Bergh P, Gunterberg B, Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Prognostic factors and outcome of pelvic, sacral, and spinal chondrosarcomas: a center-based study of 69 cases. Cancer. 2001;91:1201–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Klimo Jr P, Thompson CJ, Kestle JR, Schmidt MH. A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease. Neuro oncol. 2005;7:64–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Martinez-Monge R, Pagola M, Vivas I, Lopez-Picazo JM. CT-guided permanent brachytherapy for patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung cancer. 2008;61:209–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Merrick GS, Butler WM, Galbreath RW, Lief JH. Five-year biochemical outcome following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinical T1-T3 prostate cancer. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 2001;51:41–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson M, Colonias A, Parda D, Trombetta M, Gayou O, Reitz B, et al. Dosimetric and technical aspects of intraoperative I-125 brachytherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Phys med biol. 2007;52:1237–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang J, Zhang JG, Song TL, Zheng L, Huang MW. [CT guided interstitial 125I seed implantation treatment for head and neck malignant tumor]. West China J Stomatology. 2008;26:8–9, 14.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman HB, Batata M, Hilaris B, Whitmore Jr WF. 125I implantation for carcinoma of prostate. Further follow-up of first 100 cases. Urology. 1982;20:591–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsumine A, Kusuzaki K, Matsubara T, Shintani K, Satonaka H, Wakabayashi T, et al. Novel hyperthermia for metastatic bone tumors with magnetic materials by generating an alternating electromagnetic field. Clin exp metastasis. 2007;24:191–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze WM. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J clin oncol. 2007;25:1423–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang P, Ma Y, Wang JJ, Ran WQ, Jiang YL, Qu A. [Ultrasound guided implantation of radioactive (125)I seeds for treatment of recurrent head and neck carcinomas]. J Peking University. 2012;44:291–4.Google Scholar
  15. Park JO, Lee SI, Song SY, Kim K, Kim WS, Jung CW, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria. Jpn j clin oncol. 2003;33:533–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang XM, Zhen-Jia LI, Le-Bin WU. The clinic application of CT-guided interstitial ~(125)I seeds implantation in curing lung cancer. Chinese J Radiology. 2005;5:42–44.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis VO. What’s new in musculoskeletal oncology. J bone joint surg am. 2009;91:1546–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Donati D, El Ghoneimy A, Bertoni F, Di Bella C, Mercuri M. Surgical treatment and outcome of conventional pelvic chondrosarcoma. J bone joint surg br. 2005;87:1527–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Black P. Spinal metastasis: current status and recommended guidelines for management. Neurosurgery. 1979;5:726–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers CL, Theodore N, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Thomas T, Lam S, et al. Surgery and permanent 125I seed paraspinal brachytherapy for malignant tumors with spinal cord compression. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 2002;54:505–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutin PH, Leibel SA, Hosobuchi Y, Crumley RL, Edwards MS, Wilson CB, et al. Brachytherapy of recurrent tumors of the skull base and spine with iodine-125 sources. Neurosurgery. 1987;20:938–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Delaney TF, Chen GT, Mauceri TC, Munro JJ, Hornicek FJ, Pedlow FX, et al. Intraoperative dural irradiation by customized 192iridium and 90yttrium brachytherapy plaques. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 2003;57:239–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ptashnikov DA, Usikov VD, Korytova LI. [Current aspects of surgical treatment for primary and metastatic tumors of the spine combined with radiation and chemotherapy]. Vopr onkol. 2005;51:300–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Borchers H, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Brehmer B, Tietze L, Reineke T, Pinkawa M, et al. Permanent 125I-seed brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison considering oncological and quality of life results. BJU int. 2004;94:805–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Carlton Jr CE, Scardino PT. Combined interstitial and external irradiation for prostatic cancer. Prog clin biol res. 1987;243B:141–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li T, Li J, Wang Z, Liu B, Han D, Wang P. A preliminary comparative clinical study of vertebroplasty with multineedle or single-needle interstitial implantation of (125)I seeds in the treatment of osteolytic metastatic vertebral tumors. J neurosurg spine. 2014;20:430–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Feiz-Erfan I, Rhines LD, Weinberg JS. The role of surgery in the management of metastatic spinal tumors. Semin Oncol. 2008;35:108–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Scutellari PN, Antinolfi G, Galeotti R, Giganti M. Metastatic bone disease. Strategies for imaging. Minerva Med. 2003;94:77–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA cancer j clin. 2007;57:43–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bishop AJ, Gupta S, Cunningham MG, Tao R, Berner PA, Korpela SG, et al. Interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of locally recurrent anorectal cancer. Ann surg oncol. 2015;22 Suppl 3:S596–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kishan AU, Lee EW, Mcwilliams J, Lu D, Genshaft S, Motamedi K, et al. Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: preliminary outcomes and toxicity of a joint interventional radiology and radiation oncology technique for achieving local control in challenging cases. J contemp brachytherapy. 2015;7:327–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Koswig S, Budach V. Remineralization and pain relief in bone metastases after after different radiotherapy fractions (10 times 3 Gy vs. 1 time 8 Gy). A prospective study. Strahlenther onkol. 1999;175:500–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinez-Monge R, Nag S, Nieroda CA, Martin EW. Iodine-125 brachytherapy in the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver. Cancer. 1999;85:1218–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vikram B, Mishra S. Permanent iodine-125 implants in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer with positive surgical margins. Head neck. 1994;16:155–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cesaretti JA, Stone NN, Stock RG. Urinary symptom flare following I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 2003;56:1085–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tapen EM, Blasko JC, Grimm PD, Ragde H, Luse R, Clifford S, et al. Reduction of radioactive seed embolization to the lung following prostate brachytherapy. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 1998;42:1063–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, Chow E, Hahn C, Hoskin P, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int j radiat oncol biol phys. 2011;79:965–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cao Q, Wang H, Meng N, Jiang Y, Jiang P, Gao Y, et al. CT-guidance interstitial (125)Iodine seed brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for recurrent spinal primary tumors. Radiat oncol. 2014;9:301.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang W, Wu L. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous permanent iodine-125 implantation for patients with malignant osseous tumors. Tumori. 2014;100:296–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement