Open Access

Simultaneous reconstruction of the bone and vessels for complex femoral defect

  • Shimpei Miyamoto1Email author,
  • Masahide Fujiki1,
  • Nokitaka Setsu2 and
  • Akira Kawai2
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201614:291

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1037-8

Received: 6 August 2016

Accepted: 4 November 2016

Published: 18 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Several methods have been reported for intercalary reconstruction of femoral defects. Of these, free vascularized fibula grafts (FVFG) are preferred because of their durability, bone-healing potential, and tolerance to infection. If the bone tumor invades the femoral vessels, simultaneous vascular reconstruction also becomes necessary and significant technical hurdles make limb salvage difficult.

Case presentation

We present a 10-year-old girl who underwent limb-sparing surgery for a distal femur osteosarcoma. The femoral defect was 15 cm long, and the femoral vessel defect was 10 cm long. The femur was reconstructed with bilateral FVFG, and the femoral vessels were reconstructed with saphenous vein grafts. The grafts survived without vascular compromise, and the affected limb was preserved successfully.

Conclusions

Combined use of bilateral FVFG and autologous vein grafts makes limb-sparing surgery for a large osteosarcoma of the femur possible.

Keywords

Popliteal artery Revascularization Flow-through Lateral circumflex femoral Bypass flap

Background

Limb-sparing surgery of a massive femoral defect is a reconstructive challenge. Several methods for bridging a massive femoral defect have been reported, including massive allografts [1], free vascularized fibula grafts (FVFG) [2], massive allografts with FVFG (Capanna method) [3], recycled autografts [4], recycled autografts with FVFG [5], and segmental prostheses [6].

Of these, FVFG is the most suitable procedure because of its durability, bone-healing potential, and tolerance to infection [7]. However, the mechanical strength of single FVFG is not sufficient for femoral reconstruction and a stress fracture incidence rate of 7–16% has been reported [8]. To reconstruct a long femoral defect, bilateral FVFG therefore become necessary. If the bone tumor invades the femoral vessels, simultaneous vascular reconstruction is also required. In these cases, there are significant technical hurdles to salvaging the limb.

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report of successful reconstruction of a complex femur defect including the femoral artery. We describe a case of a 10-year-old girl who underwent simultaneous reconstruction of the distal femur and femoral vessels using bilateral FVFG and autologous vein graft after osteosarcoma resection.

Case presentation

A 10-year-old girl presented with osteosarcoma of her right distal femur, identified after a pathological fracture. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a large tumor arising from the distal femur and infiltrating the wall of the superficial femoral artery (Fig. 1). She was otherwise healthy. She underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with adriamycin, cisplatin, and methotrexate. Then, intercalary wide resection of the femur, including the femoral artery and vein, was performed. The bony defect was 15 cm long and the vascular defect was 10 cm long. The sciatic nerve and the saphenous nerve were preserved.
Fig. 1

Preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image. a Coronal view. b Axial view. Superficial femoral vessels (arrow)

The ipsilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) was harvested, and the superficial femoral artery and vein were reconstructed with interpositional vein grafts (Fig. 2). The bony defect was bridged with an intramedullary nail, and bilateral fibular grafts were transferred. Both fibular grafts were harvested with a monitoring flap; however, circulation of the left monitoring flap was found to be poor and the flap was sacrificed. The left fibula was hooked up to the superficial femoral artery and vein with an end-to-side anastomosis. The right fibula was hooked up to the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and its comitant vein (Fig. 3). The monitoring flap of the right fibula was externalized for postoperative monitoring. We did not perform tibiofibular metaphyseal synostosis for either leg.
Fig. 2

Intraoperative appearance after reconstruction of the superficial femoral artery and vein (arrows). Left side is craniad

Fig. 3

Intraoperative appearance after transfer of the bilateral FVFG. Left side is craniad. left fibula (black arrows), right fibula (white arrows), and monitoring flap of the right fibula (arrow heads)

The wounds healed uneventfully. The circulation of the left fibula was confirmed using color doppler ultrasonography. The rehabilitation started from the fifth postoperative day. The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with the same drugs from the 15th postoperative day for 3 months. At 7 months after the operation, the patient was allowed to walk with full weight bearing. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 14 months after the operation showed patency of the femoral artery and vein. At 20 months after the operation, the patient was able to walk without any assistance, despite a slight leg length discrepancy (Fig. 4). No donor-site morbidity including valgus ankle deformity developed. A plain radiograph obtained 20 months after the operation showed complete bone union (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4

Appearance after 1 year

Fig. 5

Postoperative X-ray obtained after 20 months shows complete bone union

Discussion

We successfully achieved limb salvage for a complex femoral defect after osteosarcoma resection. The defects of the femur and the femoral vessels were reconstructed with bilateral FVFG and autologous vein grafts, respectively.

Several methods have been reported to date for intercalary reconstruction of femoral defects [16, 9]. Among them, the most reasonable method for this case was the Capanna method, which combines FVFG with a massive allograft [9]. In this method, the allograft allows for immediate structural strength and FVFG provides excellent bone-healing potential [10]. However, a bone allograft is not readily available in Japan because of socioreligious reasons [4]. Instead, recycling of devitalized autograft is more widely used [4, 5, 11]. Promising results have been reported with its combined use with FVFG for intercalary femur reconstruction [5], but this method was not indicated for this patient because she had a pathological fracture.

The FVFG was the only biological reconstructive method for this patient. The major problem with FVFG for femoral reconstruction is that single-strut FVFG cannot provide sufficient primary stability for femoral reconstruction [12]. The use of folded FVFG is reported to increase initial strength, but the available length is limited to 13 cm [7]. In this patient, the bone defect was 15 cm long, which exceeds the maximum available length of folded FVFG. Therefore, bilateral FVFG became necessary.

The use of bilateral FVFG for intercalary reconstruction of extensive femoral defects has been reported by several authors [7, 8, 1214]. High rates of bone union with shorter nonweight-bearing duration are reported with this method. Tomita et al. performed bilateral FVFG for 18 femoral pseudarthrosis patients with large bony defects and achieved bone union in 15 of them (83.3%) [14]. Liang et al. performed bilateral FVFG for 16 patients with massive juxta-articular defects of the distal femur. They reported that primary bone union was achieved in 15 patients (93.8%) and eventual union in all patients (100%) [7]. Niethard et al. performed bilateral FVFG for five patients with an oncologic femoral defect. They reported that bone union was achieved in all patients (100%), including two patients with delayed union [12]. Despite these successes, bilateral FVFG are time consuming and technically demanding compared with other alternatives. This technical hurdle becomes even harder after resecting the femoral vessels because bilateral FVFG require two sets of recipient vessels.

Efficacy of vascular reconstruction in the treatment of extremity sarcoma with vascular involvement is well established [15, 16]. Defects of the femoral artery are most commonly reconstructed using an interpositional GSV graft [15]. Synthetic grafts have a similar patency rate to autologous vein grafts [17], but the need for anticoagulation therapy is a major disadvantage in young patients. Autologous vein grafts, therefore, are preferred for young patients. Although the need for simultaneous venous reconstruction is controversial [18], we performed venous reconstruction with a GSV graft in this patient. No postoperative edema of the distal limb occurred, and the reconstructed vein remained patent through the final follow-up at 20 months.

Donor-site morbidity after fibula harvest is not negligible in children. Some authors have reported progressive valgus ankle deformity after fibula harvest in children [19, 20]. To prevent valgus deformity, tibiofibular metaphyseal synostosis has been recommended in children under the age of ten [19]. On the other hand, Kanaya et al. reported that valgus deformity is inevitable even if tibiofibular metaphyseal synostosis is performed [21]. The indication of tibiofibular metaphyseal synostosis in our patient is controversial because she was just 10 years old at the time of surgery. We did not perform tibiofibular metaphyseal synostosis in this patient, and no ankle deformity developed.

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no previous report of the simultaneous reconstruction of the femoral artery and femur. This paucity can be explained by the suggestion that patients with femoral osteosarcoma with vascular involvement are commonly stratified to above-knee amputation or knee rotationplasty. Several studies demonstrated that, if the tumor infiltrates or surrounds the femoral artery, there is no difference in local tumor control and overall survival between amputation and limb salvage with vascular reconstruction [2224]. Patients with knee rotationplasty are expected to have almost the same function as those who undergo below-knee amputation [25, 26]. Despite the high functionality, the resultant disfigurement is difficult for girls to accept.

Conclusions

The combined use of bilateral FVFG and lower limb revascularization with a GSV graft is a somewhat heroic measure, but it can be a permanent and durable limb salvage solution for complex femoral defects. The functional and cosmetic advantages of this method are of great significance in the young population.

Abbreviations

FVFG: 

Free vascularized fibula grafts

GSV: 

Great saphenous vein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the paper.

Authors’ contributions

SM, MF, NS, and AK carried out the operation of the case. SM, NS, and AK carried out the following up of the patient. SM drafted the manuscript. MF, NS, and AK made critical revisions for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and her guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate is not required. In our hospital (National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan), a case report does not require ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital
(2)
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital

References

  1. Deijkers RL, Bloem RM, Kroon HM, Van Lent JB, Brand R, Taminiau AH. Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;439:151–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yajima H, Tamai S, Mizumoto S, Ono H. Vascularised fibular grafts for reconstruction of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:123–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Capanna R, Campanacci DA, Belot N, Beltrami G, Manfrini M, Innocenti M, Ceruso M. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:51–60. vi.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tanzawa Y, Tsuchiya H, Yamamoto N, Sakayama K, Minato H, Tomita K. Histological examination of frozen autograft treated by liquid nitrogen removed 6 years after implantation. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:259–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ogura K, Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M, Fujiwara T, Chuman H, Kawai A. Intercalary reconstruction after wide resection of malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity using a composite graft with a devitalized autograft and a vascularized fibula. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:861575.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cipriano CA, Gruzinova IS, Frank RM, Gitelis S, Virkus WW. Frequent complications and severe bone loss associated with the repiphysis expandable distal femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:831–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Liang K, Cen S, Xiang Z, Zhong G, Yi M, Huang F. Massive juxta-articular defects of the distal femur reconstructed by series connected double-strut free-vascularized fibular grafts. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:E71–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matsuo T, Sugita T, Shimose S, Kubo T, Sunagawa T, Yasunaga Y, Ochi M. Rigid bridging of massive femur defect using double vascularized fibula graft with hydroxyapatite. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:941–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Stans AA, Shin AY, Bishop AT, Sim FH, Moran SL. What is the outcome of allograft and intramedullary free fibula (Capanna technique) in pediatric and adolescent patients with bone tumors? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:660–8.Google Scholar
  10. Weichman K, Dec W, Morris CD, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ. Lower extremity osseous oncologic reconstruction with composite microsurgical free fibula inside massive bony allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:396–403.Google Scholar
  11. Manabe J, Ahmed AR, Kawaguchi N, Matsumoto S, Kuroda H. Pasteurized autologous bone graft in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:258–266.Google Scholar
  12. Niethard M, Tiedke C, Andreou D, Traub F, Kuhnert M, Werner M, Tunn PU. Bilateral fibular graft: biological reconstruction after resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the lower limb. Sarcoma. 2013;2013:205832.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Muramatsu K, Ihara K, Shigetomi M, Kawai S. Femoral reconstruction by single, folded or double free vascularised fibular grafts. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:550–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomita Y, Murota K, Takahashi F, Moriyama M, Beppu M. Postoperative results of vascularized double fibula grafts for femoral pseudoarthrosis with large bony defect. Microsurgery. 1994;15:316–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Baxter BT, Mahoney C, Johnson PJ, Selmer KM, Pipinos II, Rose J, Neff JR. Concomitant arterial and venous reconstruction with resection of lower extremity sarcomas. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21:272–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawai A, Hashizume H, Inoue H, Uchida H, Sano S. Vascular reconstruction in limb salvage operations for soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332:215–222.Google Scholar
  17. Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Prego AA, Ucelay-Gomez R, Freischlag JA, Ahn SS, Baker JD, Machleder HI, Moore WS. Long-term results of infrainguinal revascularization with polytetrafluoroethylene: a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:209–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lun DX, Hu YC, Huang HC. Management of great vessels and nerves in limb-salvage surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors. Orthop Surg. 2013;5:233–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Omokawa S, Tamai S, Takakura Y, Yajima H, Kawanishi K. A long-term study of the donor-site ankle after vascularized fibula grafts in children. Microsurgery. 1996;17:162–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pho RW, Levack B, Satku K, Patradul A. Free vascularised fibular graft in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:64–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanaya K, Wada T, Kura H, Yamashita T, Usui M, Ishii S. Valgus deformity of the ankle following harvesting of a vascularized fibular graft in children. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18:91–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghert MA, Davis AM, Griffin AM, Alyami AH, White L, Kandel RA, Ferguson P, O'Sullivan B, Catton CN, Lindsay T, et al. The surgical and functional outcome of limb-salvage surgery with vascular reconstruction for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:1102–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hohenberger P, Allenberg JR, Schlag PM, Reichardt P. Results of surgery and multimodal therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma invading to vascular structures. Cancer. 1999;85:396–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leggon RE, Huber TS, Scarborough MT. Limb salvage surgery with vascular reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:207–216.Google Scholar
  25. Kawai A, Hamada M, Sugihara S, Hashizume H, Nagashima H, Inoue H. Rotationplasty for patients with osteosarcoma around the knee joint. Acta Med Okayama. 1995;49:221–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujiki M, Miyamoto S, Nakatani F, Kawai A, Sakuraba M. Rotationplasty with vascular reconstruction for prosthetic knee joint infection. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:241405.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement