Open Access

Thoracolumbar paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma and scoliosis: a case report and literature review

  • Yihao Yang1,
  • Mingyan Ren2,
  • Zhongqin Yuan2,
  • Kun Li3,
  • Zhiping Zhang3,
  • Jing Zhang1,
  • Lin Xie2 and
  • Zuozhang Yang1Email author
Contributed equally
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201614:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0823-7

Received: 26 November 2015

Accepted: 29 February 2016

Published: 5 March 2016

Abstract

Paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis is a rare clinical benign disease. The case we reported is about a 12-year-old girl who was hospitalized due to neoplasm with spinal deformity in the right abdomen for 1 month. Based on a careful preoperative evaluation and found no obvious surgery contraindications, the patient was treated with surgical resection of the tumor and correction of the deformity by surgery. Postoperative pathologic examination confirmed it was a ganglioneuroma. After the operation, the patient recovered well. Her spinal deformity was corrected, and she was 5 cm taller. Complete resection of ganglioneuroma following with a low recurrence rate and a good prognosis, patient does not need further chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other treatments. All follow-up radiographic studies demonstrated no relapse of the tumor in the following 18 months. Combining this case with similar cases at home and aboard and reviewing related literature, we formed conclusions based on the manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of this disease and provided treatments for similar cases.

Keywords

GanglioneuromaScoliosisThoracolumbar spineTumor resection

Background

Ganglioneuromas are rare benign tumors that originate from a neural crest or sympathetic ganglion [1]. They most commonly appear in the posterior mediastinum and abdomen [2]. The patients exhibit no obvious symptoms upon nervous system examination. The ganglioneuromas are often found in females, while the male/female ratio is approximately 2/3 [3]. The incidence of ganglioneuroma is not well documented, but it is estimated to characterize 0.1 to 0.5 % of total central nervous system (CNS) tumors [4]. Paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis is rarer and has only been sporadically reported. In this report, we present a case of thoracolumbar paravertebral ganglioneuroma in a 12-year-old girl who presented with scoliosis. The study and analysis of the case improved the knowledge of this tumor, and related literature was incorporated to improve the understanding of the disease.

Case presentation

A 12-year-old girl visited our hospital with “a right abdominal mass and spinal deformity 1 month” on July 22, 2014. When she was 3, the girl was received a mass resection operation in the local hospital, but without postoperative pathologic examination. She recovered well after the surgery. At the age of 5, her parents found that their daughter had mild claudication, but they did not take it seriously until 1 month ago, when she complained of a right abdominal mass with mild pain. In the meantime, the parents noticed the girl had scoliosis. She was then hospitalized in our orthopedics department. The child did not have a family history of tumors. Upon physical examination, we found an old vertical operation scar sized 5 cm in the right abdominal region. In the right lumbar region, we identified a lump measuring 10 cm × 7 cm that was solid, without clear boundaries, immobilized, and having no tenderness. A lumbar right curvature could be observed, and there was no direct or indirect percussion pain or neurological deficits. From a radiographic examination, the lower segment of the thoracic and lumbar spine showed a right tumefied thoracolumbar curve and left thoracolumbar curve around the 1st lumbar body at a Cobb angle of 33.7° and Ferguson angle of 69.4° (Fig. 1a), respectively. A CT and an MRI showed a paravertebral soft tissue mass from the T12 to L2 vertebrae (Fig. 1be). The preoperative value of NSE was 17.51 μg/L↑. Other laboratory examinations revealed no other abnormalities.
Fig. 1

a The lower segment of the thoracic and lumbar spine existed a right tumefied thoracolumbar curve surrounding the first lumbar body with a Cobb angle of 33.7° and Ferguson angle of 69.4°. b, c Axial CT scans and coronary multi-plane reorganization demonstrated a right paravertebral irregular soft tissue mass with low and nonhomogeneous density, as well as uneven strength from the T12 to L2 vertebrae. The tumor grows through L1/2 right intervertebral foramen lesions to spinal canal. The intervertebral foramen becomes larger, and the right side of L2 vertebrae with irregular bone becomes corroded damage. d, e Axial enhanced MRI scan demonstrated the tumor is less homogeneous reinforcement, grows through L1/2 right intervertebral foramen lesions to spinal canal. The spinal shift to the left side due to cord compression

Fig. 2

a The tumor which was removed in the first operation was 11 cm × 7 cm × 4 cm, well encapsulated, luidity section, solid, and tough texture. b The tumor which was removed in the second operation, measuring 13 cm × 8 cm × 6 cm, has the same character with that in the first operation. c, d 4 × 10, 40 × 10 magnification photomicrograph, respectively, hematoxylin and eosin. The tumor consists of mature ganglion cells, and the oncocyte distributed in mesenchyme with different amounts glial-fibrous tissue. e 20 × 10 magnification photomicrograph, immunohistochemistry, S-100(+). f 20 × 10 magnification photomicrograph, immunohistochemistry, Vim(+)

The large tumor was adjacent to important organs such as the right kidney and inferior vena cava. Moreover, the patient presented with scoliosis. Therefore, a staging operation was performed. The first stage operation by posterior approach aimed to resect the giant tumor, which was derived from the nerve, and to correct the scoliosis. In surgery, we saw that the mass originated from the L1 nerve root and extended into the intervertebral space between L1 and L2. The posterior and partial paravertebral elements of the lump were removed following the reclamation of a vertebral column using a screw-rod system as an internal fixation by a posterior approach. The mass was 11 cm × 7 cm × 4 cm and well encapsulated, luidity section, and was solid with a tough texture (Fig. 2a). Postoperative pathologic examination confirmed it was a ganglioneuroma (Fig. 2cf). The second stage operation by the thoracoabdominal anterior-lateral approach was performed 2 months later to eradicate the thoracolumbar paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma. An intraoperative exploration found that it was a retroperitoneal mass, derived from the intervertebral foramen from L1 to L2, extending T10 to L4, measuring 13 cm × 8 cm × 6 cm, identical in character to the first mass, the giant tumor (Fig. 2b). The postoperative pathologic examination also presented identically.
Fig. 3

a, b The instrument which is used for internal fixation formed an image in the vertebral body and paravertebral region. The lower segment of the thoracic and lumbar spine existed a right tumefied thoracolumbar curve surrounding the first lumbar body with a Cobb angle of 15.3° and Ferguson angle of 44.3°. c, d CT coronary multi-plane reorganization and axial enhanced scan showed the right paravertebral mass had disappeared, and the kidney was lower compared with that before operation. The right kidney vessels are shown clearly

In postoperative plain X-radiographs, the instrument, used for internal fixation, formed an image in the vertebral body and paravertebral region. The lower thoracic and lumbar vertebra surrounding the L1 vertebral body maintained a right direction thoracolumbar scoliosis. We measured a Cobb angle of 15.3° and a Ferguson angle of 44.3° (Fig. 3a, b). A further CT revealed that, compared to preoperation, the right direction paravertebral soft tissue clump had disappeared, the right kidney had descended, and the right renal vessels imaging was clearer (Fig. 3c, d). After the staging operation, the patient’s claudication has been disappeared, the patient was 5 cm taller, and her general condition recuperated well.

Literature review

To review the cases of paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis, we used “scoliosis” and “ganglioneuroma” as keywords to search Medline for publications from the preceding 40 years. Using the strategy, we found 16 reported cases in 13 papers. For details regarding age, position, clinical characteristics, and follow-up, see Table 1.
Table 1

Literature review for the paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis

References

Sex

Age (year)

Site

Curve pattern

Clinical symptoms

Surgery

Follow-up

Onset

Diagnosis

First evaluation

During follow-up

Bauer et al. [16]

F

<12

16

L1–4

Right

Backpain

Paraparesis

TR

2 yrs, NR

Rigault et al. [17]

         

 Case 1

NM

<12

12

NM

Right

No.

No.

TR

11 yrs, NR

 Case 2

NM

7

12

NM

Left

No.

No.

TR

2 yrs, NR

 Case 3

NM

<5

5

NM

Right

Paraparesis

NM

TR

NM, NR

Sampson et al. [18]

F

10

12

T4–7

Right

No.

No.

NM

NM, NM

Cote et al. [19]

F

12

13.8

T5–8

Right

No.

Backpain

TR

2 yrs, NR

Lin et al. [20]

F

<9

9

T12-L3

Right

No.

No.

TR

NM, NM

Choi et al. [4]

F

5

7

T2-L1

Right

Weakness of both legs

NM

PR

NM, NM

Joachim et al. [21]

M

<13

13

T6–10

Right

Backpain

NM

NM

NM, NM

Velyvis et al. [11]

F

<15

15

T2–7

Right

Backpain

No.

TR

6 yrs, NR

Lai et al. [2]

F

10

12

T8–11

Right

No.

No.

TR

2 yrs, NR

Spiegel et al. [22]

F

<14

14

T5–7

Right

No.

No.

TR

2 yrs, NR

Qiu et al. [23]

         

 Case 1

M

<9

9

T9-L1

Left

No.

No.

TR

1 yrs, NR

 Case 2

F

9

14

T3–12

Right

Backpain

No.

TR

2.5 yrs, NR

Kara et al. [24]

M

2

28

T4–11

Right

NM

Dyspnea and vomiting

TR

26 yrs, R

D'Eufemia et al. [25]

F

9

11

T4–11

Right

No.

No.

PR

2 yrs, NM

Current case

F

3

12

T10-L4

Right

No.

No.

TR

18 mths, NR

M male, F female, mths months, yrs years, TR total resection, PR partial resection, NR no recurrence, R recurrence, NM not mentioned

Discussion

Neurogenic tumors may be broadly classified as arising from nerve cells or nerve sheaths. The former group includes ganglioneuroma, ganglioglioma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and neuroblastoma, and the latter includes neurilemmoma, neurofibroma, and malignant schwannoma [5]. In 1941, Eden [6] classified dumbbell-shaped tumors into four categories according to the anatomical relationship, that is, the spinal cord and vertebrae: intradural and extradural; intradural, extradural, and paravertebral; extradural and paravertebral; and foraminal and paravertebral. In this case, the tumor, which was located in the intraspinal region, passes through the intervertebral foramen to form a paravertebral mass resembling a dumbbell. It is extradural and paravertebral according to the Eden categorization. The most common dumbbell-shaped tumor is the Schwann cell tumor, whereas ganglioneuroma is relatively rare [7].

Osteoidosteoma is one of the most common types of scoliosis deformities caused by tumors [8]. The scoliosis caused by osteoidosteoma is mainly connected with pain and paravertebral myositis [9, 10]. But patients with paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis feel no pain and experience no paravertebral myositis. There are three types of paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis: (1) the tumor grows expansively, leading to damages in the side and front vertebrae and eventually to scoliosis; (2) scoliosis is mechanically stimulated, induced the tumor; (3) paravertebral ganglioneuroma and scoliosis occur simultaneously. It was reported 60~80 % of dumbbell tumors can cause nerve root compression symptoms, while 20~40 % of the patients had no nerve compression symptoms [11]. Combined with the patient’s medical history and related literatures, in this case, we consider that scoliosis was caused by ganglioneuroma. One possible reason is that the tumor stimulated the affected side vertebral epiphyseal plate, leading to its overgrowth [4]. Another possible reason is that the tumor involved paravertebral muscle of convex side, causing the convex side muscle atrophy [2].

The typical manifestation of ganglioneuroma is low density and punctate calcification on plain CT, showing a high T2 signal on MRI and a gradual increase in enhancement on dynamic images; it presents as non-enhancement or mild enhancement in the arterial phase of CTs or MRIs and progressive mild enhancement in the delayed phase. If ganglioneuroma shows an atypical manifestation on a CT and an MRI, we consider the tumor to contain a malignant component [12]. In recent years, 3D printing technology has proven helpful not only to make an operation plan and simulate the operation in the preoperative stage but also for patients to learn more about their conditions and facilitate communication with doctors [13, 14].

The ganglioneuroma shows complete capsular and basal growth by expansive patterns. The most effective therapy is a surgical removal operation as soon as possible, which can reduce the risk of malignant transformation, paraplegia, and other abnormalities. Moreover, surgery has a good prognosis. If the tumor does not affect the vital organs, it should be removed completely; however, if complete resection may cause serious complications, then a partial resection should be performed [15]. In this case, the preoperative Cobb angle was 33.7°, but due to the combined thoracolumbar paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma, a complete resection required a laminectomy. To maintain the spinal stability, in this case, the patient also required a scoliosis deformity correction and an internal fixation. The postoperative Cobb angle is 15.3°, and it was corrected well. Thoracolumbar paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma and scoliosis make a single surgical approach difficult to correct a spine deformity and resect the tumor completely. Therefore, the operation is divided into two stages. The interval time between two operations should be 1 to 7 weeks [2, 4, 11, 1625] according to literature reports. However, as for us, the interval time should be considered from patients’ recovery condition after the first operation. If the patient recovers well and shows no signs of surgical contraindication, then the second operation can be performed. A piecemeal resection of the tumor can reduce the injury of paravertebral nerve and muscle. Adopting different surgical approaches can avoid injury of important blood vessels, nerves, and organs, so that the tumor is fully exposed. On the other hand, adopting different surgical approaches is good for operation and shortening the operation time; in addition, patients will better be able to tolerate the operation, while doctors can maintain their physical stamina. And at the same time, it increases the safety during the operation. Paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma and scoliosis usually affect the lung, kidney, intestine, large blood vessels, and other important organs. The postoperative complications include cerebrospinal fluid leakage, paraparesis, intestinal obstruction, perioperative bleeding, and pneumothorax, among other complications [26]. Consequently, multidisciplinary consultation preoperation and intraoperative multidisciplinary joint surgery can lower the risks of developing complications.

Ganglioneuroma has low recurrence rate, a good prognosis, and does not require chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other treatments following complete resection [27, 28]. The patients should accept ultrasonography, DR, and CT checks regularly for a more thorough evaluation of partial recurrence after the surgery. The patient has been followed up for 18 months and shows a good scoliosis correction, a good internal fixation, and no tumor recurrence. At this point, the patient is still under follow-up.

Conclusions

Thoracolumbar paravertebral giant ganglioneuroma and scoliosis is quite uncommon. Through clinical manifestations and auxiliary examination, we can make a preliminary diagnosis, but we nevertheless require pathological diagnosis results for confirmation. The treatment of a ganglioneuroma is divided into a two-stage surgical operation: first, the correction of the deformity and then the resection of the tumor. Long-term, postoperative follow-up series indicate a low incidence of recurrence and a good survival rate if the tumor is completely resected.

Consent

The patient and the families were informed that related data and attached images in the case would be submitted for publication. Since they had signed the Informed Consent Form, its copy can be provided to the journal.

Abbreviation

CNS: 

central nervous system

F: 

female

M: 

male

mths: 

months

NM: 

not mentioned

NR: 

no recurrence

PR: 

partial resection

R: 

recurrence

TR: 

total resection

yrs: 

years

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by grant (no. 2014FB059) from the Joint Special Funds for the Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province-Kunming Medical University, a grant (no. 2015T81139) from the Special Financial Funds of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, a grant (no. 2013M542478) from the General Financial Grant of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grants (no. 2014NS013, 2014NS014, 2014NS015, 2014NS016) from the Scientific Research Projects of Internal Research Institutions of Medical and Health Units in Yunnan Province, and a grant (no. BSJJ201406) from the Doctor Scientific Research Startup funds of Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province which is the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
(2)
Department of Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
(3)
Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

References

  1. Geoerger B, Hero B, Harms D, Grebe J, Scheidhauer K, Berthold F. Metabolic activity and clinical features of primary ganglioneuromas. Cancer. 2001;91(10):1905–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lai PL, Lui TN, Jung SM, Chen WJ. Spinal ganglioneuroma mimicking adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2005;41(4):216–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stout AP. Ganglioneuroma of the sympathetic nervous system. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1947;84:101–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi YH, Kim IO, Cheon JE, Kim WS, Yeon KM, Wang KC, et al. Gangliocytoma of the spinal cord: a case report. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31(5):377–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackerman LV, Taylor FH. Neurogenous tumors within the thorax. A clinicopathological evaluation of forty-eight cases. Cancer. 1951;4:669–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eden K. The dumb-bell tumors of the spine. Br J surg. 1941;28:549–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ozawa H, Kokubun S, Aizawa T, Hoshikawa T, Kawahara C. Spinal dumbbell tumors: an analysis of a series of 118 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(6):587–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Saifuddin A, White J, Sherazi Z, Shaikh MI, Natali C, Ransford AO. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Factors associated with the presence of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(1):47–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ransford AO, Pozo JL, Hutton PA, Kirwan EO. The behaviour pattern of the scoliosis associated with osteoid osteoma or osteoblastoma of the spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 1984;66:16–20.Google Scholar
  10. Kawahara C, Tanaka Y, Kato H, Watanabe S, Kokubun S. Myolysis of the erector spinae muscles as the cause of scoliosis in osteoid osteoma of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(12):E313–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Velyvis JH, Durbhakula S, Wurapa R, Carl AL. Ganglioneuroma with scoliosis of the thoracic spine: a case report. Spine J. 2005;5(4):457–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guan YB, Zhang WD, Zeng QS, Chen GQ, He JX. CT and MRI findings of thoracic ganglioneuroma. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1016):e365–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(4):335–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B, Kamaci S, Kocadereli I. Use of three-dimensional medical modeling methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18(4):740–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanchez-Galan A, Barrena S, Vilanova-Sanchez A, Martin SH, Lopez-Fernandez S, Garcia P, et al. Ganglioneuroma: to operate or not to operate. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;24(1):25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bauer BL, Bauer H, Griss P, Lutcke A, Maroske D, Mennel HD, et al. Dumb-bell ganglioneuroma of the spine misinterpreted as progressive idiopathic scoliosis. Case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(3):189–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rigault P, Padovani JP. Ganglioneuroma and scoliosis. Report of 3 cases. Chirurgie. 1990;116(3):312–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sampson MA, Mitchell R, Morely TR. Case report: painless thoracic scoliosis due to dumb-bell ganglioneuroma—CT and MRI appearances. Clin Radiol. 1991;44(5):359–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Dzus A, Yong-Hing K. Ganglioneuroma of the thoracic spine presenting as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7(6):528–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin HC, Lu WT, Sheih CP, Liao YJ, Tseng SH, Li YW. A giant retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma with intraspinal involvement: report of one case. Acta Paed Sin. 1997;38(5):390–2.Google Scholar
  21. Baehring J, Ogle E, Sze G, Duncan C, Bannykh S. Ganglioneurocytoma of the spinal cord. J Neurooncol. 2005;71(2):149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Spiegel DA, Helseth PH, Roback SA, Partington MD, Cox TD. Atypical scoliosis in a 14-year-old girl. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:270–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Qiu Y, Wang S, Wang B, Zhu F. Adolescent thoracolumbar scoliosis secondary to ganglioneuroma: a two case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(10):E326–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kara T, Oztunali C. Radiologic findings of thoracic scoliosis due to giant ganglioneuroma. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(4):767–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. D'Eufemia P, Properzi E, Palombaro M, Lodato V, Mellino L, Tetti M, et al. Scoliosis secondary to ganglioneuroma: a case report and up to date literature review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014;23(4):322–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. De Bernardi B, Gambini C, Haupt R, Granata C, Rizzo A, Conte M, et al. Retrospective study of childhood ganglioneuroma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1710–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Reeder LB. Neurogenic tumors of the mediastinum. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;12(4):261–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Goh KY, Velasquez L, Epstein FJ. Pediatric intramedullary spinal cord tumors: is surgery alone enough? Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;27(1):34–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yang et al. 2016

Advertisement