- Case Report
- Open Access
Mandibular clear cell odontogenic carcinoma
© Kwon et al. 2015
- Received: 9 May 2015
- Accepted: 7 September 2015
- Published: 24 September 2015
Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare intraosseous carcinoma of the jaw; only 81 cases have been reported in the English literatures.
We reported an additional case and reviewed the existing literature. A 70-year-old woman presented with a large painful radiolucent mandibular lesion from the right canine to the left angle area through the midline. No metastatic lymph nodes or distant metastases were detected. She underwent wide surgical resection and reconstruction with a composite fibula free flap. She had no recurrence or metastasis after 18 months.
CCOC occurs predominantly in women in their 50s–70s in the mandible. Painless swelling is the most common symptom, followed by pain, teeth loosening, and paresthesia. CCOC has a good prognosis after surgery. In large mandibular CCOC, wide resection and composite fibula free flap reconstruction is the treatment of choice.
- Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC)
- Fibular free flap
- Mandibular reconstruction
Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare intraosseous carcinoma of the jaw which was first described as a clear cell odontogenic tumor in 1985 by Hansen . CCOC was initially known as clear cell odontogenic tumor or clear cell ameloblastoma. In 1992, CCOC was classified as odontogenic tumor by the WHO ; however, due to its aggressive tendency with local recurrence, regional lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis , CCOC was considered to be a malignant tumor of odontogenic origin in the WHO classification of 2005 .
Only 81 cases have been reported in the English literatures to date excluding the present report [5–12]. CCOC occurs predominantly in the 5th to 7th decades in women in the mandible. Painless swelling is the most common symptom and pain, teeth loosening, and paresthesia follow. In this study, we reported an additional case and reviewed the existing literatures. On review of previous studies, our case was a rare large case, extending from the right canine area to the left angle across the midline. Simultaneous reconstruction with a microvascular fibula free flap was also rare among previous cases. The present study aims to report a rare CCOC case of a large lesion with free flap reconstruction and to review the previous literature.
On immunohistochemical staining, PAS showed glycogen positive, indicating clear cells (Fig. 3b). Mucicarmine was negative, eliminating mucoepidermoid carcinoma (Fig. 3c). Expression of CK-7, which is seen in the majority of cases of carcinoma, was positive focally (Fig. 3d). In addition, S-100 was negative, ruling out melanoma (Fig. 3e). SMA, a marker of proliferation of periendothelial smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts, was also negative (Fig. 3f). Because of the consistency with clear cells and other immunohistochemical results, the final diagnosis of CCOC was established.
During 18 months of follow-up, the patient had no recurrence and distant metastasis. Under the institutional review board (IRB) granted approval of Seoul National University Dental Hospital, the fibula was successfully replaced as the mandible and a symmetrical facial outline was confirmed in the panoramic view (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the patient looked similar to her pre-operative state and did normal ambulation.
A mini review of English literatures with 81 CCOC cases
Signs and symptoms
Resection without ND
Resection with ND
Curettage or enucleation
In some cases, CCOC was reported as difficult to diagnose. Kim et al.  reported a case of a well-defined unicystic radiolucent lesion that was comparable with a cystic lesion. At first, it was misdiagnosed as an infected cyst. In our mini review of the last 81 cases, the most frequent radiologic type was radiolucent (only 4 cases were mixed type). Thus, the possibility of misdiagnosis is relatively high, and the lesion could undergo decompression or curettage before pathologic examination. A radiolucent lesion with jaw enlargement and loosening teeth should be considered to possibly be malignant CCOC in order to identify and treat patients appropriately.
CCOC is also difficult to diagnose histopathologically. The differential diagnosis of jaw tumors with prominent cytoplasmic clearing includes intraosseous salivary gland tumors (epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma) and metastatic tumors (clear cell renal cell carcinoma). Other odontogenic tumors may also show clearing of their constituent cells. Such tumors include calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor and clear cell ameloblastoma. While the former is identified by the presence of psammomatous calcifications and amyloid deposits, the latter may be difficult to distinguish from CCOC . In fact, some authors thought that clear cell ameloblastomas and CCOCs might represent a clinicopathological continuum of a single neoplastic entity . In addition, clear cell carcinoma and CCOC are difficult, and in some cases, impossible to distinguish morphologically and immunohistochemically, despite a different cell of origin. Bilodeau et al.  suggested that location is the most important distinguishing criterion for these tumors.
In CCOC, surgical resection with a wide margin is the treatment of choice. Thus, proper jaw reconstruction is important and should be performed simultaneously with resection. Fibular free flap reconstruction is necessary when the resected jaw defect is large in the mandible; it provides several advantages over other donor sites, including adequate bone length, ease of graft dissection and contouring, a two-team approach, long pedicles with proper vessels, and minimal donor site morbidity. In this case, we obtained an adequate bone length (115 mm) and were able to reconstruct the mandible with satisfactory esthetics and no complications.
Our survey of the English literature demonstrates that CCOC occurs to 5th to 7th decades in women in the mandible with painless swelling. In this case, the patient had a different symptom such as a painful toothache without swelling. We also found that it has a good prognosis after surgery. Radiographic images of CCOC generally demonstrate radiolucency but occasionally they are mixed. The differential diagnosis is broad, so a careful approach is necessary both clinically and immunohistochemically. In a large CCOC in mandible cases, wide resection and composite fibula free flap reconstruction is the treatment of choice.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
This research was supported by the International Research & Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning(Grant number: 2014K1A3A9A01033785).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Hansen LS, Eversole LR, Green T, Powell NB. Clear cell odontogenic tumor—a new histologic variant with aggressive potential. Head Neck Surg. 1985;8:115–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer IR, Pindborg JJ, Shear M. WHO Histological typing of odontogenic tumor. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar M, Fasanmade A, William Barrett A, Mack G, Newman L, Hyde NC. Metastasising clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:190–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- Zhang J, Liu L, Pan J, Tian X, Tan J, Zhou J, et al. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Med Oncol. 2011;28:S626–633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yazici ZM, Mete O, Elmalı Z, Sayin İ, Yilmazer R, Kayhan FT. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma of the maxilla. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove). 2011;54:122–4.Google Scholar
- Infante-Cossio P, Torres-Carranza E, Gonzalez-Perez LM, Gonzalez-Cardero E, Sanchez-Gallego F. Atypical presentation of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:e466–468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swain N, Dhariwal R, Ray JG. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma of maxilla: a case report and mini review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17:89–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalsi AS, Williams SP, Shah KA, Fasanmade A. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a rare neoplasm of the maxillary bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:935–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yancoskie AE, Sreekantaiah C, Jacob J, Rosenberg A, Edelman M, Antonescu CR, et al. EWSR1 and ATF1 rearrangements in clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: presentation of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118:e115–118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krishnamoorthy R, Ravi Kumar AS, Batstone M. FDG-PET/CT in staging of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:1326–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim M, Cho E, Kim JY, Kim HS, Nam W. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma mimicking a cystic lesion: a case of misdiagnosis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;40:199–203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avninder S, Rakheja D, Bhatnagar A. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4:91–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braunshtein E, Vered M, Taicher S, Buchner A. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma and clear cell ameloblastoma: a single clinicopathologic entity? A new case and comparative analysis of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1004–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bilodeau EA, Hoschar AP, Barnes EL, Hunt JL, Seethala RR. Clear cell carcinoma and clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a comparative clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Head Neck Pathol. 2011;5:101–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar