Open Access

Sentinel node biopsy using indocyanine green in oral/oropharyngeal cancer

  • Hanwei Peng1Email author,
  • Steven J. Wang2,
  • Xiaohua Niu1, 5,
  • Xihong Yang1,
  • Chongwei Chi3 and
  • Guojun Zhang4
Contributed equally
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201513:278

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0691-6

Received: 16 April 2015

Accepted: 7 September 2015

Published: 17 September 2015

Abstract

Backgrounds

Radioactive tracer-based detection has been proposed as a standard procedure in identifying sentinel nodes for cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma. However, access to radioactive isotopes may be limited in some surgical centers, and there is potential risk of the radioactive tracers to the operators. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green combined with blue dye mapping in sentinel node biopsy for cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Methods

Twenty-six cases of previously untreated oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma staged cT1-2N0M0 were enrolled in this study. One milliliter of indocyanine green (5 mg/ml) and 1.5 ml of methylene blue (1 mg/ml) were injected sequentially around the primary tumor in a four-quadrant pattern before skin incision. After elevation of the platysma flap and posterior retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, fluorescence images were taken with a near-infrared detector, with special attention paid to any blue-dyed lymph nodes. Lymph nodes identified first with fluorescent hot spots with or without blue dye were defined as sentinel nodes, and they were harvested and sent for pathologic study.

Results

Sentinel nodes were successfully harvested in all 26 cases. The number of sentinel nodes (SNs) per case varied from 1 to 9, with an average of 3.4. Routine pathology demonstrated occult metastasis exclusively in SNs in four cases (15.4 %). No tracer-associated side effects occurred in this series.

Conclusions

Near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green combined with methylene blue mapping is a feasible and reliable new method for SN biopsy in cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Keywords

Sentinel node biopsy Indocyanine green Near-infrared fluorescence Oral neoplasms Oropharyngeal neoplasms Methylene blue

Background

Management of the clinically negative neck (cN0) in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma remains a dilemma. Because there is no diagnostic test available that can accurately evaluate cervical lymph node metastatic status, management options for this situation have included elective neck dissection or watchful waiting [13]. However, studies demonstrate that 20–40 % of cN0 patients have occult cervical metastases and will inevitably develop cervical recurrence if a watchful waiting policy is followed; on the other hand, the 60–80 % of patients who have truly negative neck nodes will risk unnecessary injury if an elective neck dissection is performed. Heretofore, selective neck dissection (SND), a procedure that is less invasive than radical neck dissection or modified neck dissection, is widely accepted as the gold standard for management of cN0 neck of oral/oropharyngeal cancer [1, 48].

In the past two decades, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as a promising minimally invasive procedure for management of the cN0 neck of oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma [1, 9, 10]. SNB allows the surgeon to identify and harvest the upper echelon lymph nodes that drain the site of a primary malignancy. Furthermore, SNB allows the pathologist to focus on a few lymph nodes and make further pathologic analysis of both clinically occult micro- and macro-metastases. Use of this technique may avoid overtreatment of oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma with pathologically N0 neck.

SNB is a more minimally invasive procedure than SND, and it has higher sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the metastatic status of the cN0 neck in oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma compared to traditional physical examination and imaging scans (CT, MRI, or PET/CT) or image-guided FNA [1, 9, 10]. Although SNB has been administered as a routine procedure in breast cancer, skin melanoma, and vulvar carcinoma in many centers worldwide, its use in head and neck mucosal cancers is much less common, likely because of challenges with regard to sentinel node (SN) detection techniques when applied to the head and neck [1114]. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative γ probe detection or blue dye mapping is the most commonly used technique for SNB in head and neck mucosal cancers [7, 12]. However, the access of radioactive isotopes is limited in many surgical units, and there is potential risk of the radioactive tracers to the operators. We have previously performed studies of SNB in oral tongue cancers using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with intraoperative Methylene blue dye mapping or with intraoperative γ probe and achieved encouraging results [1518]. However, because of the inconvenience of the procedure and potential hazards of the radioactive tracer, we attempted to look for an alternative technique which would be accurate, convenient, and safe.

Near-infrared fluorescence (NIF) imaging is a newly developed SNB technique firstly introduced by Kitai et al. in 2005 [19]. Subsequent reports of its successful use in gastric, gynecologic, lung, esophagus, as well as skin cancer are found in the literature [2022]. To our knowledge, there are only a few pilot studies of SNB with NIF mapping for head and neck mucosal cancer that have been published, which have demonstrated the proof of principle and safety of this technique; however, the largest subject sample size was only 14 cases [2326]. Clearly, further studies with more patients are needed to establish the feasibility and reliability of NIF imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) for evaluating the cervical lymph node status of cN0 head and neck mucosal cancers. In the current study, we report our results of SNB for 26 cases of cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma using NIF imaging with ICG combined with methylene blue mapping. Considering the higher possibility of occult metastasis in cT3–4 cases, similar to other studies, we included only cT1-2N0M0 patients in the current study.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated cT1-2N0M0 oral or oropharyngeal cancer who were to undergo selective neck dissection (levels I–III) or modified radical neck dissection plus radical resection of the primary tumor with or without reconstruction were enrolled in this study. Exclusion criteria were age <18, having a history of previous neck surgery or radiotherapy; pregnancy; lactation; or an allergy to iodine, shellfish, or ICG. Clinical stage was based on physical examination and imaging studies (CT or MRI with contrast).

This study was conducted with the approval of Medical Ethics Committee of Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before SNB.

SN mapping was performed using the Optical Molecular Imaging Operation Navigation System (OMIONS, Zhongke Medical Imaging Technology Co. Ltd., Anhui, China). The system consists of two wavelength-isolated light sources: a “white” light source, generating 400–650 nm light and a “near-infrared” light source, generating 760 nm light. Color video and NIR fluorescence images are simultaneously acquired and displayed in real time using custom optics and software that separate the color video and NIF images. The imaging head is attached to a flexible double-joint arm, which permits positioning of the imaging head virtually anywhere over the surgical field [27].

The ICG (Dandong, China) was dissolved at a concentration of 5 mg/ml, and the methylene blue (Beijing, China) was prepared at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. One milliliter of ICG was injected around the tumor in a four-quadrant pattern (Fig. 1); 1.5 ml of methylene blue was then injected in the same manner. Immediately after injection of the tracers, a standard incision was made and the platysma flap was elevated. After exposure of the subplatysmal plane in the neck and retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle posteriorly, the surgical field was measured for fluorescent signal using the OMIONS. During neck dissection, measurement of fluorescence was performed every 5 to 10 min until hot spot(s) appeared on the screen. Special attention was paid to the blue-dyed lymphatics and lymph nodes. The first appearing lymph nodes with NIF hot spots with or without visible blue dye were defined as SNs and were resected for further confirmation under the OMIONS (Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5). Neck dissection was continued after harvest of the SNs; any blue-dyed lymphatic at this point was considered to be second station lymph nodes rather than SNs, and they were separately sent for pathologic analysis. The resection of the primary tumor was subsequently performed by standard procedure; reconstruction of the defect was done as indicated. The harvested SNs were bisected along the long axis through their hilum; one half was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sent for routine pathologic examination; the other half was deposited in liquid nitrogen for further investigation. All non-SNs were examined by routine histopathological analysis.
Fig. 1

One milliliter of indocyanine green at a concentration of 5 mg/ml was injected around the tumor in a four-quadrant pattern

Fig. 2

After exposure of the subplatysmal plane in the neck and retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle posteriorly, fluorescent hot spots appeared under “near-infrared” light source

Fig. 3

Color image of the sentinel nodes under “white” light source shows visible blue dye

Fig. 4

Ex vivo sentinel nodes with or without blue dye

Fig. 5

Ex vivo confirmation using OMIONS showed all sentinel nodes had fluorescent hot spots

Results

Patient and tumor features

Clinical data of the patients are detailed in Table 1. A total of 26 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (n = 19) or oropharynx (n = 7) and a clinical stage of T1-3N0M0 were enrolled in this study from July 2014 to December 2014. Median patient age was 60.5 years (range 43–77 years). Fifteen patients had cT1 primary, eleven patients had cT2. Location of primary tumor included oral tongue (n = 14), buccal mucosa (n = 3), palatoglossal arch (n = 3), base of the tongue (n = 3), hard palate (n = 2), and soft palate (n = 1). All patients underwent a radical resection of the primary tumor with negative surgical margins. Of the 26 patients, eleven needed a surgical reconstruction (radial forearm flap, n = 7; infrahyoid myocutaneous flap, n = 2; local mucosal flap, n = 1; skin graft, n = 1), whereas primary closure was possible for the remaining patients. Ipsilateral SND was performed in 20 patients, modified radical neck dissection (MRND) was performed in 5 patients, and bilateral SND was performed in 1 patient; selection of an appropriate ND type was based on clinical indications. The sentinel node excision was performed prior to the reconstructive surgery; SNB did not have any impact on reconstruction. There were no complications associated with the technique. SNB added an average of about 15 min to the total operation time compared with a standard neck dissection procedure.
Table 1

Clinical data of the patients enrolled

Pt No.

Age

Sex

Primary site

cTNM

ND type

Reconstruction

pTNM

SN site

SN no. (p+/total)

Other LN no.

1

63

M

Palate

T1N0M0

SND

Local mucosal flap

T1N0M0

IIa

0/2

0/12

2

55

F

PGA

T1N0M0

MRND

RFAF

T1N2M0

IIa, III

2/3, 0/2

0/19

3

51

F

Tongue

T1N0M0

MRND

None

T1N0M0

IIa

0/6

0/22

4

59

M

BOT

T2N0M0

SND

None

T3N0M0

IIa

0/2

0/25

5

72

M

Buccal

T2N0M0

SND

None

T2N0M0

Ib

0/1

0/9

6

71

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

SND

None

T3N0M0

IIa

0/3

0/24

7

57

M

Buccal

T2N0M0

SND

None

T3N1M0

Ib

1/1

0/17

8

55

M

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

IHMCF

T1N2MO

Ib, IIa

1/2, 2/3

0/26

9

66

F

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N0M0

IIa

0/3

0/24

10

49

M

PGA

T1N0M0

MRND

RFAF

T1N0M0

IIa

0/9

0/17

11

56

M

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N0M0

Ib, IIa

0/1, 0/2

0/13

12

45

F

Palate

T2N0M0

SND

RFAF

T2N0M0

IIa

0/1

0/14

13

72

M

PGA

T1N0M0

MRND

RFAF

T1N0M0

IIa

0/5

0/19

14

53

F

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N0M0

Ib, IIa

0/2, 0/2

0/12

15

73

M

Buccal

T1N0M0

SND

Skin graft

T1N0M0

Ib

0/6

0/12

16

47

M

BOT

T1N0M0

bi-SND

IHMCF

T1N0M0

Ia

0/1

0/30

17

75

F

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N0M0

IIa

0/2

0/9

18

73

M

Soft palate

T1N0M0

SND

RFAF

T1N0M0

IIa

0/1

0/11

19

77

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

SND

None

T2N0M0

Ia, IIa

0/2, 0/3

0/17

20

55

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

MRND

None

T3N0M0

Ia, III

0/2, 0/2

0/39

21

64

M

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N1M0

Ib,IIa

1/1, 0/2

0/20

22

56

M

BOT

T2N0M0

SND

RFAF

T2N0M0

IIa, III

0/1, 0/3

0/18

23

76

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

SND

None

T2N0M0

IIa

0/1

0/29

24

50

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

SND

None

T2N0M0

Ib, IIa

0/2, 0/2

0/20

25

68

F

Tongue

T2N0M0

SND

None

T2N0M0

Ia, IIa

0/1, 0/2

0/17

26

62

F

Tongue

T1N0M0

SND

None

T1N0M0

Ia, III

0/1, 0/3

0/23

Abbreviations: ND neck dissection, SN sentinel node, LN lymph node, p+ pathologically positive, M male, F female, SND selective neck dissection, bi-SND bilateral selective neck dissection, cSND contralateral selective neck dissection, PGA palatoglossal arch, MRND modified radical neck dissection, RFAF radial forearm flap, BOT base of the tongue, IHMCF infrahyoid myocutaneous flap

At least 1 SN was successfully detected in all 26 patients. A total of 88 SNs were harvested, with a SN number per case of 1-9, average of 3.4 SNs. The number of non-SNs was 498 in 26 cases, with an average of 19.2 per case. All the SNs were detected in the ipsilateral neck; anatomic distribution of these 88 SNs was as follows: level IIa 63.6 % (56/88), level Ib 17.0 % (15/88), level III 11.4 % (10/88), and level Ia 8.0 % (7/88).

Routine histological analysis of the neck dissection specimens demonstrated that four patients had occult lymph node metastasis (15.4 %), and all the metastatic tumors were found exclusively in SNs. Nodal classification was elevated from cN0 to pN1 and pN2 both in two patients.

Additional blue-dyed lymph nodes after removal of the SNs were found in 11 patients. All these lymph nodes were free from metastasis under routine pathology.

No side effects associated with ICG injection were observed in this series.

Discussion

Although multiple studies have demonstrated the potential benefit of SNB in head and neck cancers, only a few centers have used this technique to determine the necessity of neck dissection for cN0 head and neck cancers, due to several possible reasons including the complex lymphatic anatomy of the head and neck and less accessibility of the primary tumor location [28]. With regard to SN detection techniques, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative γ probe detection, with or without blue dye mapping, is now considered the gold standard method [12, 29, 30]. However, several disadvantages of this standard procedure are notable: (1) SNB using radioactive tracers requires a nuclear physician, and both the staff and patient are exposed to radiation although the dose is much lower than the maximum safe limit; (2) the use of radioactive tracer is also associated with the need to safely dispose of any contaminated waste; (3) preoperative lymphoscintigraphy entails an additional procedure for the patient which increases the overall cost of care; furthermore, the lymphoscintigraphy injection is done while patients are awake which may provoke pain and anxiety for some; (4) the so-called shine-through phenomenon handicaps SN detection when the primary site and the possible SNs are in close anatomic proximity, e.g., cancer of the floor of the mouth [5, 12]; and (5) blue dye also has disadvantages, in that blue-dyed SNs can only be identified when the lymphatic or lymph nodes are surgically exposed. Thus, developing a novel alternative to overcome these pitfalls without compromising diagnostic reliability could increase the acceptance and use of SNB for head and neck cancer. We hypothesize that intraoperative NIF imaging with ICG combined with blue dye mapping is a SNB technique that is a potential alternative to the current gold standard of isotope detection.

ICG has been used extensively in the medical field since 1957 [31]. It is now widely used in measurement of liver/renal function, retinal angiography, cardiac output, as well as perforator detection in flap harvest and monitoring [32]. As soon as ICG is infused intravenously, it rapidly binds to plasma proteins and thereby is confined to the vascular space. ICG is removed exclusively by the liver at the rate of 18–24 % per minute with a half-life of 150–180 s [22]. The clinical use of ICG in detection of SN successfully was first introduced by Kitai in breast cancer [19]. To our knowledge, only a few studies on SNB for head and neck mucosal carcinoma using NIF imaging with ICG have been reported in the English literature, and the results show potential feasibility [2326, 28]. However, further studies are needed to verify the feasibility, efficacy, and optimal protocol for this technique.

Drawing from our previous experience doing SNB for oral cancer using radioactive tracer and blue dye mapping, we performed the current study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of SNB using NIF imaging combined with methylene blue dye mapping for oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma. The fluorescent signals were successfully captured after elevation of the platysma flap and posterior retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in all 26 cases. SNs in 15 cases were also visibly blue dyed. In a study using ICG with blue dye in SNB for breast cancer, Hirono et al. defined both fluorescence positive and blue-dyed lymph nodes as SN [33]. However, we surmise that migration of ICG from the primary to the SNs is in the same manner as but faster than that of methylene blue [20], resulting in a proportion of SNs that concentrate only detectable ICG without visually detectable level of methylene blue. All the blue-dyed lymph node(s) identified after fluorescence hot spots were free from metastasis, supporting the rationale of the SN definition used in this series: the lymph node(s) with hot spots detected first were defined as SN. Anatomic distribution of the SNs in the current study was similar to the metastatic pattern of oral/oropharyngeal cancer in our early retrospective study [34]: most frequently in ipsilateral level IIa (63.6 %, 56/88), followed by level I (25.0 %, 22/88), finally level III (11.4 %, 10/88). The average number of SNs harvested in this study was higher than our previous study using radioactive tracer (3.4 per case vs. 2.0 per case) [16, 17].

There are several advantages of this technique compared with standard SNB with radioactive tracers. (1) ICG is a radiation-free tracer and safe, rare side effects have been reported, and special radiation protection is unnecessary. (2) SNB using NIF imaging with ICG is a convenient one-step procedure; patients’ discomfort and anxiety during preoperative injection of the tracer for lymphoscintigraphy can be avoided. (3) The cost of a full dose of ICG is much less than a radiotracer, and the fluorescence imaging device is also less expensive than a γ probe; therefore, as a result of the lower cost, patients in developing countries may also benefit from SNB with ICG. (4) With stimulation of near-infrared light, the fluorescent signal of the ICG was detectable after platysmal flap elevation and posterior retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, making it easy for a surgeon to remove the SNs; as demonstrated in this study, SNs were successfully identified in all 26 cases. (5) SNs harvested with this technique represent the first echelon nodes that drain the primary site. In the current study, we demonstrated that fluorescence positive SNs accurately determined the cervical lymph node metastatic status in all 26 cases, without any false negatives.

In this study, selective or modified radical neck dissections were still performed in all patients. Our results suggest removal of sentinel nodes alone could reliably demonstrate the cervical nodal status for these tumors. If comprehensive neck dissection could be limited to those with positive sentinel nodes, the potential morbidity of this surgical procedure would be avoided and the cost and length of hospital stay might be reduced.

Interestingly, the average number of SNs harvested in our study is higher than other reports [33]. We believe that this may be related to the sensitivity of the OMIONS. Since quantification of the NIF is not possible using the current generation of OMIONS, we harvested all lymph nodes with any visible fluorescent signal.

Another previously reported advantage of SNB with ICG fluorescent imaging in superficial cancers is that it enables visualization of lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor to the regional lymph node basin. Thus, SNs can be identified and resected more rapidly and easily, especially in cases with multiple lymphatic drainage pathways [35]. However, this advantage was not observed in our study. We failed in attempts to measure fluorescent signal transcutaneously in all the first five cases. A possible explanation is that the penetrating thickness through soft tissues of NIF from ICG is 0.5–1 cm [32, 35], whereas oral cavity and oropharyngeal lymphatic channels and SNs are usually embedded in the deep fatty tissue and blocked by either mandible or sternocleidomastoid muscle, making it impossible for the CCD camera to capture the NIF signal transcutaneously.

The inability to detect NIF signal transcutaneously does mean that an initial neck incision of sufficient length must be made to allow exposure of the expected neck levels where the sentinel nodes are likely located, which is an acknowledged drawback of this technique. In comparison, with the radioactive tracer/γ-probe technique, transcutaneous detection allows one to make a small skin incision over the target sentinel nodes. Another drawback of this technique is that shadowless lights in the operating theater give off their own intrinsic NIF beam; therefore, lymphatic navigation must be performed in the dark to minimize the interference with beams produced by the ICG.

Conclusions

Based on the results of our study, which is the largest series reported to date, we conclude that NIF imaging with ICG to identify the SNs in oral/oropharyngeal cancer is feasible, reliable, and safe. SNB using this technique correctly evaluates the cervical node status as confirmed on routine pathology of complete neck dissection specimens. NIF imaging with ICG is a promising SNB technique for oral/oropharyngeal cancer that deserves further research to refine the technique. Future consideration should be given to a prospective trial comparison of NIF imaging with ICG versus radioisotope techniques for sentinel node identification in oral cancer.

Notes

Abbreviations

BOT: 

base of the tongue

cN0: 

clinically negative neck

IHMCF: 

infrahyoid myocutaneous flap

MRND: 

modified radical neck dissection

NIF: 

near-infrared fluorescence

OMIONS: 

Optical Molecular Imaging Operation Navigation System

PGA: 

palatoglossal arch

RFAF: 

radial forearm flap

SNB: 

sentinel node biopsy

SND: 

selective neck dissection

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding source

This work was supported by the funds from Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2011CB707705).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
(2)
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
(3)
Intelligent Medical Research Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(4)
Breast Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
(5)
Current address: Key Lab of Major Obstetrics Disease of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

References

  1. Ahmed MM, Moore BA, Schmalbach CE. Utility of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma sentinel node biopsy: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150:180–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yongkui L, Jian L, Wanghan, Jingui L. 18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with primary head and neck cancer before treatment: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2013;22:e11–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, Casselman JW, Kremer B, van Engelshoven JM, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:266–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rigual N, Loree T, Frustino J, Jayaprakash V, Cohan D, Sullivan M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in lieu of neck dissection for staging oral cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:779–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Civantos FJ, Stoeckli SJ, Takes RP, Woolgar JA, de Bree R, Paleri V, et al. What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2010? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:839–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Civantos Jr F, Zitsch R, Bared A, Amin A. Sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:683–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stoeckli SJ, Pfaltz M, Ross GL, Steinert HC, MacDonald DG, Wittekind C, et al. The second international conference on sentinel node biopsy in mucosal head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:919–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ross GL, Shoaib T, Soutar DS, MacDonald DG, Camilleri IG, Bessent RG, et al. The First International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer and adoption of a multicenter trial protocol. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:406–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Radkani P, Mesko TW, Paramo JC. Validation of the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique in head and neck cancers of the oral cavity. Am Surg. 2013;79:1295–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Civantos FJ, Zitsch RP, Schuller DE, Agrawal A, Smith RB, Nason R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately stages the regional lymph nodes for T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinomas: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1395–400.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Patuzzo R, Maurichi A, Camerini T, Gallino G, Ruggeri R, Baffa G, et al. Accuracy and prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanomas. J Surg Res. 2014;187:518–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Alkureishi LW, Burak Z, Alvarez JA, Ballinger J, Bilde A, Britten AJ, et al. Joint practice guidelines for radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node localization in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3190–210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1365–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindell G, Jonsson C, Ehrsson RJ, Jacobsson H, Danielsson KG, Kallstrom BN, et al. Evaluation of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node procedure in vulvar cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;152:91–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang SL, Guo ZM, Zhang Q, Wei MW, Yang AK, Peng HW, et al. [Sentinel lymph node radiolocalization in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue]. Ai Zheng. 2007;26:533–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peng HW, Zeng ZY, Chen FJ, Guo ZM, Zhang Q, Wei MW. [Clinical research of sentinel node biopsy in oral tongue carcinoma]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004;39:126–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang G, Fan W, Zhang W, Peng H. Sentinel lymph node detection by combined dye-isotope technique and its predictive value for cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with lingual carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;116:1213–5.Google Scholar
  18. Peng HW, Zeng ZY, Chen FJ, Guo ZM, Zhang Q, Xu GP, et al. [Optimized methods of sentinel node localization in cN0 tongue carcinoma]. Ai Zheng. 2003;22:286–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitai T, Inomoto T, Miwa M, Shikayama T. Fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green for detecting sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2005;12:211–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kong SH, Noh YW, Suh YS, Park HS, Lee HJ, Kang KW, et al. Evaluation of the novel near-infrared fluorescence tracers pullulan polymer nanogel and indocyanine green/gamma-glutamic acid complex for sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in large animal models. Gastric Cancer. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0345-3.Google Scholar
  21. Handgraaf HJ, Verbeek FP, Tummers QR, Boogerd LS, van de Velde CJ, Vahrmeijer AL, et al. Real-time near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery in gynecologic oncology: a review of the current state of the art. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):606–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts HW, Donati-Bourne JF, Wilson VL, Wilton JC. The use of live fluorescence staining techniques in surgery: a review. J Invest Surg. 2013;26:283–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Vorst JR, Schaafsma BE, Verbeek FP, Keereweer S, Jansen JC, van der Velden LA, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping of the oral cavity in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:15–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iwai T, Maegawa J, Hirota M, Tohnai I. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using a new indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system with a colour charged couple device camera for oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:e26–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. van den Berg NS, Brouwer OR, Klop WM, Karakullukcu B, Zuur CL, Tan IB, et al. Concomitant radio- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity using ICG-(99 m)Tc-nanocolloid. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1128–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bredell MG. Sentinel lymph node mapping by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in oropharyngeal cancer—preliminary experience. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chi C, Ye J, Ding H, He D, Huang W, Zhang GJ, et al. Use of indocyanine green for detecting the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients: from preclinical evaluation to clinical validation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83927.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakamura Y, Fujisawa Y, Nakamura Y, Maruyama H, Furuta J, Kawachi Y, et al. Improvement of the sentinel lymph node detection rate of cervical sentinel lymph node biopsy using real-time fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green in head and neck skin cancer. J Dermatol. 2013;40:453–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Govers TM, Hannink G, Merkx MA, Takes RP, Rovers MM. Sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:726–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heuveling DA, Flach GB, van Schie A, van Weert S, Karagozoglu KH, Bloemena E, et al. Visualization of the sentinel node in early-stage oral cancer: limited value of late static lymphoscintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:1065–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Paumgartner G. The handling of indocyanine green by the liver. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1975;105:1–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Te Velde EA, Veerman T, Subramaniam V, Ruers T. The use of fluorescent dyes and probes in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:6–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirano A, Kamimura M, Ogura K, Kim N, Hattori A, Setoguchi Y, et al. A comparison of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging plus blue dye and blue dye alone for sentinel node navigation surgery in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4112–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Guo ZM, Zeng ZY, Chen FJ, Peng HW, Wei MW, Zhang Q, et al. [Management option for cervical metastases in tongue squamous cell carcinoma with clinically N0 neck]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005;40:91–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Polom K, Murawa D, Rho YS, Nowaczyk P, Hunerbein M, Murawa P. Current trends and emerging future of indocyanine green usage in surgery and oncology: a literature review. Cancer. 2011;117:4812–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peng et al. 2015

Advertisement