Open Access

Harmonic focus in total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection: a prospective randomized study

  • Qingqing He1Email author,
  • Dayong Zhuang1,
  • Luming Zheng1,
  • Peng Zhou1,
  • Jixin Chai1 and
  • Zhen Lv1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology20119:141

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-141

Received: 9 August 2011

Accepted: 31 October 2011

Published: 31 October 2011

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare operating time, postoperative outcomes, and surgical complications of total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection between the no-tie technique using the Harmonic Focus and classic suture ligation for hemostasis. Fifty-four patients underwent total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection by classic suture ligation and 51 patients by the Harmonic Focus. There was obvious distinction as to the operating time between the Focus and classic group (102.8 and 150.1 minutes, respectively, P < 0.05). Drainage volume (202.7 ± 187.0 mL vs 299.7 ± 201.4 mL, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the Focus group. Transient hypoparathyroidism had no statistically significant difference between the groups (17.6% vs 18.5%, P > 0 .05). No patient experienced nerve injury or permanent hypocalcemia. The use of Harmonic Focus for the control of thyroid vessels during thyroid surgery is reliable and safe. The device can offer extraordinary capabilities for delicate tissue grasping and dissection.

Keywords

papillary thyroid microcarcinoma thyroid surgery Harmonic Focus total thyroidectomy haemostasis

Background

In early reports, the harmonic scalpel demonstrated some advantages over conventional techniques, particularly in terms of operating time and intraoperative bleeding. The main advantages of ultrasonic coagulating/dissecting systems compared with a standard electrosurgical device are manifested by minimal lateral thermal tissue damage, less smoke formation, no neuromuscular stimulation, and no electrical energy through the patient[1, 2]. This new technology is extensively used in laparoscopic surgery and several fields of minimally invasive surgery [35]. Harmonic Focus has been developed to which allows for precise and simultaneous cutting as well as hemostasis with minimal damage to surrounding tissues. Safe thyroid surgery requires meticulous hemostasis. Hemostasis in thyroid surgery is achieved by means of the conventional clamp-and-tie technique, diathermy, hemostatic clips, and, recently, the Harmonic Focus.

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the operating time, overall drainage volume, and surgical complications such as hypocalcemia, laryngeal nerve palsy in thyroid surgery with the use of the Harmonic Focus.

Methods

Patient Eligibility and Study Design

The study involved 13 men and 92 women from January 2010 to September 2010. One hundred and five consecutive patients were preoperatively diagnosed as papillary thyroid microcarcinoma following typically ultrasound identification of nodules and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology (Figure 1). Exclusion criteria included previous neck operation, a history of neck irradiation. Patients with clinically positive nodes or functional neck dissection were excluded in this study. When level III-IV lymph nodes were positive on frozen section analysis, the dissection was extended to include level IIa and V. The treatment was conducted in accordance with the hospital's ethical standards as set out by its Ethics Committee for Analysis of Research Projects on Human Experimentation. All patients were blinded to the surgical technique used and signed an informed written consent before enrollment to the trial. This prospective randomized trial study was performed on these 105 consecutive patients given total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection (pretracheal, bilateral paratracheal, and prelaryngeal lymph nodes) [6, 7]. Patients were randomly assigned to either the Focus group (in which the operation was performed entirely using the Harmonic Focus and no other hemostatic tool; 51 patients) or the classic group (in which the operation was performed using conventional clamp-and-tie technique and mono-polar electric scalpel; 54 patients). The patients all underwent similar treatment following the same protocol, except for the Harmonic Focus used. Total thyroidectomy and level III-IV and VI dissection were performed by the same experienced thyroid surgical team(six adept surgeons) in all cases. The two groups did not display statistically significant differences in term of age, gender, BMI, and pathology classification (Table 1).
Figure 1

Thyroid microcarcinoma was discovered by screening with ultrasonography.

Table 1

Clinical data between two groups

Variable

Focus Group

(n = 51)

Classic Group

(n = 54)

P-value

Mean age, y[range]

48(27-76)

46.5(23-73)

> 0.05

Sex, No. M/F

6/45

7/47

> 0.05

Diagnosis, No. of patients

   

   papillary thyroid microcarcinom

51

54

> 0.05

Body mass index(BMI)

22.8 ± 1.6

22.6 ± 1.7

> 0.05

A complete preoperative assessment (serum thyrotropin levels, parathyroid hormone, serum Ca and P, nodule size by ultrasonography) was obtained in all patients. Preoperative laryngeal nerve status was determined by indirect laryngoscopy, performed by the same otolaryngologist from the Department of Otolaryngology.

Surgical Technique

Six adept surgeons can use both techniques. Total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection was performed in all patients. Under either block anesthesia cervical plexus or general anesthesia and with endotracheal intubation, the patients were placed on the operating table in the supine position with the neck extended. A 5 cm low-collar incision was made above the sternal notch. After skin incision with the conventional scalpel, flaps were raised using the mono-polar electric scalpel. In the Focus group, we used the Harmonic Focus for vascular control of the thyroid gland (Harmonic Focus, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc, Cincinnati, OH. Figure 2). For better hemostasis, the middle vein, the superior and inferior thyroidal arteries and veins were controlled using level 3. Other small vessels and surrounding connective tissues were controlled using level 5 for easy cutting. For patients in the classic group, mono-polar electric scalpel was used to control the small vessels of the gland and conventional "clip, cut and tie" routines was adapted for the superior and inferior thyroidal arteries, as well as the superior, middle and inferior veins. Total thyroidectomy was first performed. In all patients, we identified recurrent laryngeal nerve routinely. The delicate technique was performed by seeking, identifying and exposing the nerve itself with all branches and following its course with care until it entered larynx. Thyroid gland was examined by frozen section examination during surgery. The tumor size was equal to or less than 10 mm. The parathyroid glands were identified macroscopically, and a meticulous dissection from the thyroid gland was performed. Every effort was made to identify and preserve all parathyroid glands. Parathyroid glands were transplanted in the sternocleidomastoid muscle, if the blood supply to the glands was compromised. Outcomes of the study included operating time, fluid content in the suction balloon (drainage volume), and incidence of complications (rate of hypocalcemia and laryngeal nerve injury). The operative time was measured from initiation of the incision to conclusion of the skin closure. The drains were removed if drainage volume was less than 5 mL in 24 hours.
Figure 2

Paratracheal lymph nodes dissection with the Harmonic Focus, and recurrent laryngeal nerve identified. (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc, Cincinnati, OH).

In all patients, serum parathyroid hormone, serum Ca and P levels were obtained the first postoperative day. Biochemical hypoparathyroidism was defined as serum parathyroid hormone level below 15 ng/L (normal, 15-65 ng/L). Patients with postoperative transient biochemical hypoparathyroidism were giving oral calcium carbonate and calcitriol supplementation, although they showed no clinical symptoms of hypocalcemia. The parathyroid function usually recovers within 3 weeks.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the differences between groups was performed using the 2-sample t test and χ2 test. Statistical analysis was made by SPSS 13. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

15 patients(9 cases in the Focus group and 6 in the classic group) with multifocal or bilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma received both level III-IV dissection (Figure 3). The final pathology in all the patients was papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. All cases were pN0-1b by TNM-staging [8]. The mean tumor diameter was (6.8 ± 2.8) mm. Of the 105 patients, central cervical lymph node metastases were found in 51 (48.6%) patients. Two cases had 1-2 positive level III or IV lymph nodes on final postoperative paraffin sections, thus they did not receive functional neck dissection again.
Figure 3

Total thyroidectomy conbined with level III-IV and VI dissection.

Operative and Postoperative parameters for 2 groups were presented in Table 2. Operating time was significantly shorter in Focus group (P < 0.05) by allowing a one third time saving vs classic hemostasis. Postoperative transient biochemical hypoparathyroidism occurred more frequently in the classic group than in the Focus group, but no obvious distinction. All patients recovered completely, and no permanent hypoparathyroidism was registered.
Table 2

Operative and Postoperative parameters between 2 groups

Variable

Focus Group

(n = 51)

Classic Group

(n = 54)

P -value

Primary tumor size(mm)

6.9 ± 2.5

6.6 ± 2.9

> 0.05

Total operating time(min)

102.8 ± 15.6

150.1 ± 32.9

< 0.05

Time of total

   

   thyroidectomy(min)

43.5 ± 16.1

69.6 ± 24.6

<0.05

Amount of drainage(ml)

202.7 ± 187.0

299.7 ± 201.4

< 0.05

Time of drainage(d)

5.5 ± 2.5

5.9 ± 2.2

>0.05

Serum PTH (ng/L)

   

preoperative

46.90 ± 18.58

43.87 ± 17.21

>0.05

Postoperative

20.6 ± 14.3

19.06 ± 16.88

>0.05

Serum Ca (mmol/L)

   

preoperative

2.37 ± 0.14

2.29 ± 0.23

>0.05

postoperative

2.10 ± 0.18

2.07 ± 0.26

>0.05

Serum P (mmol/L)

   

preoperative

1.35 ± 0.32

1.38 ± 0.37

>0.05

postoperative

1.44 ± 0.27

1.47 ± 0.29

>0.05

Hypoparathyroidism

9

10

>0.05.

Postoperative

   

   hospitalization (d)

5.8 ± 1.35

6.7 ± 1.86

<0.05

Parathyroid gland

   

   autotransplantation(n)

14

16

>0.05.

RLN paralysis

   

   Temporary(n)

1

0

<0.05

   Permanent

0

0

 

Superior laryngeal nerve injury

0

0

 

Lymphatic ducts injured

   

   chyle leakage(n)

1

1

>0.05

Abbreviations: PTH, parathyroid hormone; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve.

No injury to superior laryngeal nerve and recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred. Only one patient (in Focus group) presented temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Intraoperative bleeding was not significant in any patient, and no neck hematoma, seroma, wound infection, or postoperative bleeding was observed. There were neither blood transfusions nor postoperative definitive sequelae. The mean postoperative hospital stay was reduced in the Focus group (P < 0.05). The rate of parathyroid gland autotransplantation was not statistically significant between Focus group (27.5%) and classic group (29.6%).

Two cases with positive lymph node dissection had postoperative chyle leakage. The maximal production of chylous fistula was about 1500 ml/d. Then they were subjected to high negative pressure drainage and local pressure dressing. Sandostatain and reasonable dietry control were applied in two patients. Chyle leakages stopped within 2 weeks.

Discussion

The thyroid gland has an extensive vascular network, thus meticulous hemostasis is essential to ensure a dry surgical field and avoid inadvertent damage to adjacent vital structure. Although total thyroidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures, whether it is the safest, most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve hemostasis is debated [9]. Means to prevent and control intra- or postoperative bleeding therefore remain a topic of utmost importance. In conventional surgery, electrocoagulation and suture ligation are used for haemostasis. The development of ultrasonic instruments in the early 1990s has provided an alternative to other methods of controlling blood vessels(e.g., Ligasure precise, lasers, clips, and staples)[10, 11]. Despite their safety and effectiveness in thyroid surgery, the previous harmonic scalpel instruments are considered large and cumbersome by some surgeons. The new harmonic scalpel(Focus) has been made available since 2008. Recently, the Harmonic Focus has been used as an alternative to conventional hand-tied ligation for hemostasis in thyroid surgery[1216]. The Harmonic Focus gave surgeons the versatility to perform several important functions(e.g., to dissect, cut, coagulate and grasp) without the need to exchange instruments. The device divides tissue by using 55.5 kHz ultrasonic energy transmitted between the instrument blades. This mechanical action disrupts protein hydrogen bonds within the tissue, and functions at a relatively low temperature (between 50°C and 100°C) to cause a lesser tissue injury compared with electrocautery (the Harmonic Focus causes lateral thermal injury 1.5 mm wide, approximately half of that caused by mono-polar systems).

Our data show that the Harmonic Focus allow a one third time saving vs classic hemostasis. Furthermore, the use of the Harmonic Focus would allow reduced traction and reduced manipulation of the thyroid, particularly when dividing the upper pedicle and transecting the superior pole, as claimed by Miccoli et al [17, 18]. The reduced tissue injury and the better hemostasis are confirmed by the statistically significant reduction of drainage volume for patients in the Focus group. That reduction draws attention to the great sealing capacity of this device. After using the Harmonic Focus, some investigators reached similar conclusions regarding postoperative drainage, whereas others did not [1923]. The Harmonic Focus proved to be safe, with good control of the blood vessels and no bleeding after surgery. At our institute, we used the Harmonic Focus exclusively for hemostasis in thyroid surgery, scarcely any ties.

Finally, our data demonstrate that the complication rate in the Focus group might not be significantly reduced. Incidences of definitive hypoparathyroidism, superior laryngeal nerve and recurrent nerve palsy were also not statistically significant. Intraoperative chyle leakage was not found in any patient, although postoperative leakage was detected in two patients. Postoperative lymphatic vessel leak or chylous fistula can be avoided by careful neck dissection in at-risk area during operation. Proper postoperative conservative management is of great help when leakage occurred. Careful dissection techniques using ultrasonic scalpels may be useful for preventing the occurrence of chyle leakage [24].

On the other hand, a major criticism of the Harmonic Focus is its cost [2527]: the Harmonic Focus is disposable, expensive, yet must be considered an additional cost in the diagnosis related group's Medicare hospital payment system. However, when the reduced operating time and length of stay are considered, the device actually might be cost-effective. The use of the Harmonic Focus in multinodular goiter surgery allows for a significant reduction in the length of the procedure with a comparable cost. This represents a refinement of our current technique, with decreased anesthesia and operating time, and has clear economic impacts. But unfortunately, the Harmonic Focus is very expensive(¥7200 in China). The use of the harmonic Focus reduces surgical time, but increases the cost of the surgery. It is our belief that by including in the absolute cost the time saved and the reduction in human resources needed, the use of the Harmonic Focus would prove to be economic.

Conclusions

The Harmonic Focus makes it fast and easy to perform a total thyroidectomy plus level III-IV and VI dissection without bleeding. The main advantage of this technique is that it simplifies the surgical procedure and eliminates the need to have repetitive "clip, cut and tie" maneuvers, while achieving efficient hemostasis. We have demonstrated that the Harmonic Focus is a new ultrasonic device in thyroid surgery, and offering great capabilities for delicate tissue grasping and dissection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Third Batch Special Foundation of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(No. 201003759). The authors appreciated the help on statistics in this paper given by Fei He, graduate student in the Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics of State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Ethical Committee

All patients provided written informed consent for the study, and the study was approved by the Jinan Military General Hospital Research Ethics Board.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Jinan Military General Hospital

References

  1. Bandi G, Wen CC, Wilkinson EA, Hedican SP, Moon TD, Nakada SY: Comparison of blade temperature dynamics after activation of Harmonic Ace scalpel and the Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel LCS-K5. J Endourol. 2008, 22: 333-336. 10.1089/end.2007.0169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Redwan AA: Single-working-instrument, double-trocar, clipless cholecystectomy using harmonic scalpel: a feasible, safe, and less invasive technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010, 20: 597-603. 10.1089/lap.2009.0375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wilhelm T, Metzig A: Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 1757-1758. 10.1007/s00464-009-0820-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ecker T, Carvalho AL, Choe JH, Walosek G, Preuss KJ, Hemostasis in thyroid surgery: harmonic scalpel versus other techniques--a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010, 143: 17-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sanguinetti A, Docimo G, Ragusa M, Calzolari F, D'Ajello F, Ruggiero R, Parmeggiani D, Pezzolla A, Procaccini E, Avenia N: Ultrasound scissors versus electrocautery in axillary dissection: our experience. G Chir. 2010, 31: 151-153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Robbins KT, Shaha AR, Medina JE, Califano JA, Wolf GT, Ferlito A, Som PM, Day TA, Committee for Neck Dissection Classification, American Head and Neck Society: Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008, 134: 536-538. 10.1001/archotol.134.5.536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yu XM, Wan Y, Sippel RS, Chen H: Should all papillary thyroid microcarcinomas be aggressively treated? an analysis of 18,445 cases. Ann Surg. 2011, 254: 653-660.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A: AJCC cancer staging manual (7th ed). 2010, New York, NY: Springer, 111-122.Google Scholar
  9. Dadan J, Nowacka A: A journey into the past--the history of thyroid surgery. Wiad Lek. 2008, 61: 88-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pons Y, Gauthier J, Ukkola-Pons E, Clément P, Roguet E, Poncet JL, Conessa C: Comparison of LigaSure vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and conventional hemostasis in total thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009, 141: 496-501. 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.06.745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, De Crea C, Di Bidino R, Oragano L, Bellantone R: The use of "harmonic scalpel" versus "knot tying" for conventional "open" thyroidectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008, 393: 627-631. 10.1007/s00423-008-0380-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Prgomet D, Janjanin S, Bilić M, Prstacić R, Kovac L, Rudes M, Katić V: A prospective observational study of 363 cases operated with three different harmonic scalpels. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 266: 1965-1970. 10.1007/s00405-009-0954-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Markogiannakis H, Kekis PB, Memos N, Alevizos L, Tsamis D, Michalopoulos NV, Lagoudianakis EE, Toutouzas KG, Manouras A: Thyroid surgery with the new harmonic scalpel: A prospective randomized study. Surgery. 2011, 149: 411-415. 10.1016/j.surg.2010.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Manouras A, Markogiannakis HE, Kekis PB, Lagoudianakis EE, Fleming B: Novel hemostatic devices in thyroid surgery: electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system and harmonic scalpel. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008, 5: 447-466. 10.1586/17434440.5.4.447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Koh YW, Park JH, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC: Clipless and sutureless endoscopic thyroidectomy using only the harmonic scalpel. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 1117-1125. 10.1007/s00464-009-0738-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cirocchi R, D'Ajello F, Trastulli S, Santoro A, Di Rocco G, Vendettuoli D, Rondelli F, Giannotti D, Sanguinetti A, Minelli L, Redler A, Basoli A, Avenia N: Meta-analysis of thyroidectomy with ultrasonic dissector versus conventional clamp and tie. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2010, 8: 112-128. 10.1186/1477-7819-8-112.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Miccoli M, Frustaci G, Fosso A, Berti P: Evaluation of a new ultrasonic device in thyroid surgery: comparative randomized study. Am J Surg. 2010, 199: 736-740. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Berti P: Minimally invasive thyroidectomy in the treatment of well differentiated thyroid cancers: indications and limits. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010, 18: 114-118. 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283378239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McNally MM, Agle SC, Williams RF, Pofahl WE: A comparison of two methods of hemostasis in thyroidectomy. Am Surg. 2009, 75: 1073-1076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koh YW, Park JH, Lee SW, Choi EC: The harmonic scalpel technique without supplementary ligation in total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2008, 247: 945-949. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816bcd61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyreoidectomy (MIVAT) with and without use of harmonic scalpel--a randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008, 393: 647-654. 10.1007/s00423-008-0373-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sartori PV, De Fina S, Colombo G, Pugliese F, Romano F, Cesana G, Uggeri F: Ligasure versus Ultracision in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008, 393: 655-658. 10.1007/s00423-008-0386-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mourad M, Rulli F, Robert A, Scholtes JL, De Meyer M, De Pauw L: Randomized clinical trial on Harmonic Focus shears versus clamp-and-tie technique for total thyroidectomy. Am J Surg. 2011, 202: 168-174. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakayama H, Ito H, Kato Y, Tsuboi M: Ultrasonic scalpel for sealing of the thoracic duct: evaluation of effectiveness in an animal model. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009, 9: 399-401. 10.1510/icvts.2009.206706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sebag F, Fortanier C, Ippolito G, Lagier A, Auquier P, Henry JF: Harmonic scalpel in multinodular goiter surgery: impact on surgery and cost analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009, 19: 171-174. 10.1089/lap.2008.0043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. D'Ajello F, Cirocchi R, Docimo G, Catania A, Ardito G, Rosato L, Avenia N: Thyroidectomy with ultrasonic dissector: a multicentric experience. G Chir. 2010, 31: 289-292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Scilletta B, Cavallaro MP, Ferlito F, Li Destri G, Minutolo V, Frezza EE, Di Cataldo A: Thyroid surgery without cut and tie: the use of Ligasure for total thyroidectomy. Int Surg. 2010, 95: 293-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© He et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement