- Case report
- Open Access
Gallbladder perforation associated with carcinoma of the duodenal papilla: a case report
© Hosaka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 18 February 2010
- Accepted: 20 May 2010
- Published: 20 May 2010
Gallbladder perforation is a rare clinical condition, which mostly occurs following acute cholecystitis associated with cholelithiasis. A tumor of the ampulla of Vater causes gradually progressive symptoms, and is rarely associated with perforation of the gallbladder.
A 56-year-old man with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater presented with spontaneous gallbladder perforation and localized bile peritonitis. He complained of right upper abdominal pain, and laparotomy revealed perforation of the gallbladder with no gallstones. Postoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy demonstrated a slightly enlarged duodenal papilla, and biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma of the ampulla. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed subsequently.
Ampullary carcinoma can be associated with gallbladder perforation and present with acute manifestations. Immediate surgical treatment is required for this condition.
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Biliary Tract Cancer
- Gallbladder Wall
- Ampullary Carcinoma
Gallbladder perforation (GBP) is a rare but life-threatening condition, which usually requires immediate surgical intervention. Most cases are complicated by acute cholecystitis associated with cholelithiasis , although acute acalculous cholecystitis or intramural vessel thrombosis can sometimes lead to GBP [2, 3].
A tumor of the ampulla of Vater causes gradually progressive symptoms such as jaundice or weight loss, and rarely presents with acute manifestations [4–6]. In this report, we describe a case of ampullary carcinoma presenting with acute development of GBP and bile peritonitis, and discuss the clinical features of the disease.
It has been reported that GBP occurs in about 5% of patients with acute cholecystitis [1, 7]. Ischemic changes of the gallbladder wall triggered by progression of local inflammation lead to gangrene and perforation, which might explain why perforation occurs in the fundus, the most distant part from the main feeding artery, in more than half of cases. Systemic vascular disorders, such as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetes, immunosuppressed states, and malignancy are major risk factors for GBP . Most cases of GBP follow an exacerbation of acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis, and GBP without gallstones is rare. Such cases are mainly attributed to impairment of the blood supply induced by intramural thrombosis . In our patient, who had no underlying risk factor for GBP, no stones were found in the gallbladder, and postoperative pathological examination revealed no thrombotic occlusion of intramural vessels, which is extremely uncommon. The cause of GBP remains unclear. It might have been induced by acute progression of cholecystitis, although the causal relationship between the ampullary tumor and GBP is not obvious.
Preoperative diagnosis of GBP is often difficult, which delays surgical intervention and leads to high morbidity and mortality [1, 7]. CT and ultrasonography are useful in making the diagnosis. Gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid collection, and a streaky omentum or mesentery are common findings of GBP [1, 7–9]. However, accurate diagnosis of a defect in the gallbladder wall is rather challenging. CT has been reported to be more sensitive than ultrasonography in detecting a perforation site in the gallbladder [1, 8], while Sood et al.  reported that a defect in the gallbladder wall could be visualized in more than 70% of cases either by CT or ultrasonography, and suggested the latter as the first-line imaging modality in the evaluation of suspected GBP cases. In our patient, the defect in the gallbladder wall and the amount of leaked bile were small, which made preoperative diagnosis difficult.
Obstructive jaundice is the most common presentation of carcinoma of the papilla, followed by weight loss, abdominal pain, and nausea [4–6]. The disease usually shows gradual progression of these symptoms, and rarely displays an acute clinical onset. Associated GBP, as in our patient, is extremely uncommon. The prognosis of ampullary carcinoma is relatively better than that of other biliary tract cancers after surgical resection . Lymph node metastasis and pancreatic invasion are important prognostic factors [4, 11]. Beger et al.  reported that lymph node involvement was observed in about 10% of patients with a pT1 carcinoma of the papilla. Therefore, Kausch-Whipple procedure or PPPD with lymph node dissection is the first choice of treatment even in patients with localized cancer, although local resection might be beneficial in patients with a poor general condition [12, 13].
Although extremely rare, carcinoma of the duodenal papilla can be associated with GBP and display acute manifestations. In a case of GBP without cholelithiasis, ampullary tumor should be considered as a possible underlying condition.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Derici H, Kara C, Bozdag AD, Nazli O, Tansug T, Akca E: Diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder perforation. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 7832-6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang AJ, Wang TE, Lin CC, Lin SC, Shih SC: Clinical predictors of severe gallbladder complications in acute acalculous cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9: 2821-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Namikawa T, Kobayashi M, Okabayashi T, Okamoto K, Akimori T, Sugimoto T, Hanazaki K: Clinicopathological analysis of idiopathic perforation of the gallbladder. Surg Today. 2007, 37: 633-7. 10.1007/s00595-006-3476-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beger HG, Treitschke F, Gansauge F, Harada N, Hiki N, Mattfeldt T: Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg. 1999, 134: 526-32. 10.1001/archsurg.134.5.526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madjov R, Chervenkov P: Carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. Diagnostic and surgical problems. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003, 50: 621-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N, Nakajima H, Horiguchi S, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A: Clinicopathologic features of ampullary carcinoma without jaundice. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 40: 162-6. 10.1097/01.mcg.0000196191.42296.e0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menakuru SR, Kaman L, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN: Current management of gall bladder perforations. ANZ J Surg. 2004, 74: 843-6. 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03186.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim PN, Lee KS, Kim IY, Bae WK, Lee BH: Gallbladder perforation: comparison of US findings with CT. Abdom Imaging. 1994, 19: 239-42. 10.1007/BF00203516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sood BP, Kalra N, Gupta S, Sidhu R, Gulati M, Khandelwal N, Suri S: Role of sonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder perforation. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002, 30: 270-4. 10.1002/jcu.10071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishihara S, Miyakawa S, Takada T, Takasaki K, Nimura Y, Tanaka M, Miyazaki M, Nagakawa T, Kayahara M, Horiguchi A: Status of surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer. Dig Surg. 2007, 24: 131-6. 10.1159/000101901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moriya T, Kimura W, Hirai I, Mizutani M, Ma J, Kamiga M, Fuse A: Nodal involvement as an indicator of postoperative liver metastasis in carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006, 13: 549-55. 10.1007/s00534-006-1113-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beger HG, Thorab FC, Liu Z, Harada N, Rau BM: Pathogenesis and treatment of neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater: Kausch-Whipple procedure with lymph node dissection in cancer of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004, 11: 232-8. 10.1007/s00534-004-0895-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi A, Konishi M, Nakagohri T, Takahashi S, Kinoshita T: Therapeutic approach to tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Am J Surg. 2006, 192: 161-4. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.