- Case report
- Open Access
Intramedullary non-specific inflammatory lesion of thoracic spine: A case report
© Landi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 October 2009
Accepted: 15 January 2010
Published: 15 January 2010
There are several non-neoplastic lesions which mimick intramedullary spinal cord neoplasm in their radiographic and clinical presentation. These can be classified as either infectious (TB, fungal, bacterial, parasytic, syphilis, CMV, HSV) and non-infectious (sarcoid, MS, myelitis, ADEM, SLE) inflammatory lesions, idiopathic necrotizing myelopathy, unusual vascular lesions and radiation myelopathy. Although biopsy may be indicated in many cases, an erroneous diagnosis of intramedullary neoplasm can often be eliminated pre-operatively.
the authors report a very rare case of intramedullary non-specific inflammatory lesion of unknown origin, without signs of infection or demyelinization, in a woman who showed no other evidence of systemic disease.
Intramedullary lesions that mimick a tumor can be various and difficult to interpret. Preoperative MRI does not allow a certain diagnosis because these lesions have a very similar signal intensity pattern. Specific tests for infective pathologies are useful for diagnosis, but histological examination is essential for establishing a certain diagnosis. In our case the final histological examination and the specific tests that we performed have not cleared our doubts regarding the nature of the lesion that remains controversial.
There are several non-neoplastic lesions which mimick intramedullary spinal cord neoplasm. These can be classified as either infectious (TB, fungal, bacterial, parasytic, syphilis, CMV, HSV) and non-infectious (sarcoid, MS, myelitis, ADEM, SLE) inflammatory lesions, idiopathic necrotizing myelopathy, unusual vascular lesions and radiation myelopathy. Although biopsy may be indicated in many cases, an erroneous diagnosis of intramedullary neoplasm can often be eliminated pre-operatively.
We will discuss in detail the differential diagnosis we considered:
Intramedullary tumours of the spinal cord are rare. The most common are astrocytomas and ependymomas which together account for 90%. These lesions can cause significant difficulties in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and vascular abnormalities and neoplasms. Because the clinical characteristics of neoplastic and non-neoplastic spinal cord lesions may be very similar, we rely on MRI for making a correct diagnosis. The MRI makes it possible to locate tumours in the extradural, intradural or extramedullary spaces, or within the cord itself; the tumour's location and its MRI characteristics may actually identify its specific type. In some instances, however, it is quite difficult to identify the exact nature of the pathological changes without a complete and detailed history and clinical examination . In addition, due to the extreme heterogenity of the symptoms and radiological aspects of these lesions, which causes many difficulties in differential diagnosis, it's very important to perform a histological examination, and an extemporary histological finding during surgery. In our case the extemporary histological finding oriented us towards a small cell tumoral lesion, guiding our surgical strategy towards a total removal instead of a biopsy. The most common intramedullary tumors are astrocytomas and ependymomas. Cytological analysis of our lesion did not show the presence of glial-type tumoral cells. In addition, the non-neoplastic nature of the lesion was confirmed by isolation, using immunohistochemical techniques, of T and B lynphoid cells, with the individuation of a polyclonality of plasma cells and with the evidence of slight kappa and lambda chains of immunoglobulins. This histological pattern indicated the possibility of a granulomatous inflammatory intramedullary lesion.
Granulomatous inflammatory and infectious lesions
Granulomatous lesions affecting the spinal cord are principally tubercolosis, sarcoidosis, brucellosis and histocytosis X . In our case the postoperative performance of a BK test and toxotest excluded the possibility of TBC  and toxoplasmosis . Postoperative radiological investigations like chest X-ray, excluded presence of extramedullary localizations of histiocytosis X  and sarcoidosis . As a matter of fact, our first diagnostic hypothesis, was sarcoidosis, that is characterized by the formation of non-caseating multiple granulomas and is similar in appearance to lesions from tuberculosis, although sarcoid lesions do not contain caseation, typical necrosis or TB bacilli. Giant epithelioid cells, otherwise called Langhan cells, may be numerous or infrequent, but contain intracytoplasmatic inclusions that are not present in tubercolosis and are called Schaumann bodies. These inclusions, however, are not specific for sarcoidosis [7, 8]. Diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis depends upon demonstration of a systemic sarcoidosis and the exclusion of other causes for the neurological status. If the lesions of the nervous system do not appear to involve other tissues, as in our case, the diagnosis is misinterpretable and requires histological confirmation . This histological evaluation, in our case, did not show any specific aspects of neurosarcoidosis. Several authors consider the specificity of cerebrospinal fluid angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) high enough to warrant inclusion in the diagnostic evaluation of patients in whom CNS neurosarcoidosis is being considered. However the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid ACE is not clearly defined and can not replace the biopsy. ACE was first reported to be increased in CSF in patient with CNS sarcoidosis in the mid-1980s. Currently the discriminator value of 8 nmol/mL/min was associated with the best combination of sensitivity (55%) and specificity (94%) [6, 7, 9, 10] In our case the cerebrospinal fluid ACE activity was 3.2 nmol/mL/min. Futhermore the Kveim test, a specific skin test used to establish the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, wich is usually positive from 60% to 90% depending on the stadium of the desease, in this case was impossible to execute because in our country is not legal.
In addition, non-tumoral intamedullary lesions generally originate from bacterial, fungal or parasytic localizations, but is unusual for an intramedullary abscess to be present so soon in the absence of systemic disease, as in our case. In these cases the most frequent etiopathology of infection depends on intravenous drug use and immune deficiency disorders, aspects that were not present in our patient . The lesion was studied with histochemical techniques, like PAS and Ziehl Neelsen, that excluded the possibility of a bacterial or fungal nature.
Another intamedullary lesion that mimicks a tumor can be an MS localization. Isolated spinal cord involvement has been rare and can be the initial manifestation of MS . MS is characterized by numerous areas of demyelination and sclerosis in CNS. Generally, in cases without periferical demyelinating lesions, spinal cord biopsy may be a necessary course of action. The histological specific aspects of MS are demyelinating lesions with aggregates of foamy histiocytes . In our case the possibility of MS lesion was excluded because the lesion did not present these histological aspects and there was no evidence of demyelinating lesions in other districts . Another aspect that has to be analysed is the possibility that this lesion may be an intramedullary localization of a demyelinating disease such as SNM (subacute necrotizing myelopathy) . The intramedullary pathological changes that accompany this disease have been well characterized and consist of demyelination, myelomalacia and necrosis, associated with a proliferation of hyalinized capillary-sized vessels and occasional intraluminal thrombosis and endoluminal calcifications , aspects which were not present in our case.
Degenerative and iatrogenic lesions
Another lesion which may mimick an intramedullary tumor is radiation melyopathy . The most common type of this disease is called Chronic Progressive Radiation Myelopathy CPRM, that usually appears 15-20 months after radiation therapy. The histological pattern is very similar to SNM, with plasmacytic infiltration, necrosis and venous teleangectasias. In our case the patient didn't show these aspects and moreover had never undergone radiation therapy. Furthermore degenerative diseases can mimick intramedullary tumors caused by contrast uptake of the myelopathy; In our case imaging excluded such an origin of the disease.
In our experience it is considered appropriate strategy decompression surgery to be performed as soon as the symptoms given by compression of cord manifested by worsening paraparesis or paraplegia. All of that is supported later by histological analysis that can guide intraoperative tank towards the complete removal or to a simple biopsy then integrated with medical therapy. In our case, the therapeutic strategy "wait and see" was based exclusively on the aggravation of the clinical, especially neurological symptoms, radiological outcome and appearance of the extemporaneous histological lesions that favored an injury repetitive small cell lung cancer. All these aspects justified up to us the complete removal of the lesion, then the result is justified by the complete regression of symptoms.
Intramedullary lesions that mimick a tumor can be various and difficult to interpret. Preoperative MRI does not allow a certain diagnosis because these lesions have a very similar signal intensity pattern. Specific tests for infective pathologies such as toxoplasmosis and TBC, besides specific tests for sarcoidosis, are useful for diagnosis. Histological examination is often essential for establishing a certain diagnosis. In our case the worsening of symptoms oriented us to a decompressive surgical strategy and total removal of the lesion, also in relation to the extemporary histological examination: this proved correct because of the drastic improvement observed in symptomatology and the total regression, without recrudescence, of symptoms and disease at 12 months follow-up. The final histological examination and the specific tests that we performed have not cleared our doubts regarding the nature of the lesion that remains controversial.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Brinar M, Rados M, Habek M, Poser MC: Enlargment of the spinal cord: Inflammation or neoplasms?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006, 108: 284-289. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.11.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz TH, McCormick PC: Non-neoplastic intramedullary pathology. Diagnostic dilemma: to Bx or not to Bx. J Neuro-Oncol. 2000, 47: 283-292. 10.1023/A:1006495212574.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torii H, Takahashi T, Shimizu H, Watanabe M, Tominaga T: Intramedullary spinal tubercoloma. Neurologia medico-chirurgica (Tokyo). 2004, 44 (5): 266-268. 10.2176/nmc.44.266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mehren M, Burns PJ, Mamani F, Levy CS, Laureno R: Toxoplasmic myelitis mimicking intramedullary spinal cord tumor. Neurology. 1988, 38: 1648-1650.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton B, Connolly ES, Mitchell WT: Isolated intramedullary histiocytosis-X of the cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 1995, 83: 716-718. 10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jallo GI, Zagzag D, Lee M, Deletis V, Morota N, Epstein FJ: Intraspinal sarcoidosis: diagnosis and management. Surg Neurol. 1997, 48: 514-521. 10.1016/S0090-3019(96)00440-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinas FC, Rengachary S: Diagnosis and management of neurosarcoidosis. J Clin Neurosc. 2001, 8 (6): 505-513. 10.1054/jocn.2000.0950.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caneparo D, Lucetti C, Nuti A, Cipriani G, Tessa C, Fazzi P, Bonucelli U: A case of sarcoidosis presenting as a non-specific intramedullary lesion. Eur J Neurol. 2007, 14 (3): 346-9. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01527.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar N, Frohman EM: Spinal neurosarcoidosis mimicking an idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2004, 61 (4): 586-589. 10.1001/archneur.61.4.586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varron L, Brousolle C, Candessanche JP, Marignier R, Rousset H, Ninet J, Sève P: Spinal cord sarcoidosis: report of seven cases. Eur J Neurol. 2009, 16: 289-96. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02409.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee M, Epstein FJ, Rezai AR, Zagzag D: Nonneoplastic intramedullary spinal cord lesions mimicking tumors. Neurosurgery. 1998, 43 (4): 788-794. 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zagzag D, Miller DC, Kleinmann GM, Abati A, Donnenfeld H, Budzilovich GN: Demyelinating disease versus tumor in surgical neuropathology. Clues to a correct pathological diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993, 17: 537-545. 10.1097/00000478-199306000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeffrey DR, Mandler RN, Davis IE: Retrospective analysis of 33 cases, with differentiation of cases associated with MS and parainfectious events. Arch Neurol. 1993, 50: 532-535.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nesbit GM, Forbes GS, Scheithauer BW, Okazaki H, Rodriguez M: Multiple sclerosis: histopathologic ad MR and/or CT correlation in 37 cases at biopsy and three cases at autopsy. Radiology. 1991, 180: 467-474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.