Nine years experience in surgical approach of leiomyomatosis of esophagus
© Asteriou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 14 November 2009
Accepted: 23 December 2009
Published: 23 December 2009
Leiomyomas of esophagus, although rare, are the most frequent benign tumors of esophagus. Aim of this study is the presentation of 7 patients with esophageal leiomyomas who underwent surgical treatment during a 9-year period.
Epidemiological data (sex, age), the presenting symptoms, diagnostic examinations, tumor location, histopathological findings and the safety and efficacy of surgical resection are analyzed and assessed.
5 men and 2 women with mean age of 56.9 years were operated. In 3 cases the tumor was located at the lower esophagus, while in the other 4 cases, the leiomyoma was found at the median third of esophagus. 4 patients had severe symptoms related to the leiomyoma, such as dysphagia and epigastric pain. All patients underwent a right postolateral thoracotomy with enucleation of the lesion. None of them received resection of part of the esophagus. The mean diameter of the resected tumors was 4.3 cm. The dimensions of leiomyomas were immediately associated with the symptoms. In no case was detected malignancy or recurrence. All patients were relieved from their symptoms, while postoperative morbidity and mortality did not occur.
Esophageal leiomyoma is a benign tumor, which causes symptoms only if its size becomes large. Surgical enucleation is considered to be safe and effective, without complications.
The esophageal leiomyoma is a benign tumor of the esophagus. Other non-malignant lesions of esophagus are hemangioma, lymphangioma, squamous papilloma, fibrovascular polyp and granular cell myoblastoma. The incidence of this kind of lesions is referred to be almost 1% of the esophageal neoplasms in the international literature . Leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of esophagus. The main symptoms usually are dysphagia and epigastric pain, but they are not specific for the disease. Differential diagnosis should always include esophageal cancer . It is important for the modern cardiothoracic surgeon to be aware of this entity. Here, a small case series of 7 patients who were treated in our Institute during the last 9 years is presented, with emphasis in diagnosis and management.
Patients and Methods
This study is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients, whose diagnosis was a possible esophageal leiomyoma. The study took place at the Theagenio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki from September 2000 to September 2009. Seven patients were detected. The epidemiological data (sex, age), presenting symptoms, diagnostic examinations, tumor location, histopathological findings and the safety and efficacy of the surgical resection were analyzed. The standard examinations included preoperative esophagogastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography of the chest. Fine needle aspiration was not performed in any case.
Clinical presentation, diagnostic examinations' results and surgical approach.
Submucosal hypoechoic tumor at 22-28 cm
Submucosal hypoechoic nodule at 29-32 cm
Epigastric pain, Dysphagia
Submucosal hypoechoic tumor at 23-28 cm
Submucosal hypoechoic nodule at 22-26 cm
Submucosal hypoechoic tumor at 27-33 cm
Retrosternal burning, Dysphagia
Submucosal hypoechoic tumor at 20-27 cm
Submucosal hypoechoic nodule at 29-34 cm
Leiomyomas belong to benign mesenchymal tumors of esophagus. They are the most common non-malignant lesions of esophagus, with an incidence approaching 60% of all benign tumors of the organ . The symptoms accompanying esophageal leiomyomas are not specific. It seems that the size of tumor correlates with the severity of the symptoms. Dysphagia with concomitant epigastric pain or retrosternal burning usually appears when the tumor's diameter becomes larger than the critical point of 4.5-5 cm . Smaller leiomyomas may cause mild symptomatology, like unspecified discomfort, or even may be asymptomatic at all. In the majority of cases the lesions are located at the distal two thirds of the esophagus. In our small series, the distribution was almost equal in the two aforementioned positions.
Leiomyomas can mimic cancer of esophagus. Lack of specific symptoms as well as the similarity in initial clinical expression may cause diagnostic confusion. It is, therefore, obligatory the full preoperative investigation of each patient complaining for symptoms possibly relating with an esophageal lesion. Esophagogastroscopy combined with endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation of the tumor is mandatory in order to exclude cancer of esophagus from the differential diagnosis [4, 5]. Leiomyoma's typical appearance is of homogeneous and hypoechoic lesion with clear margin (Fig 1, 2) [6–8]. Computed Tomography scans of the chest ideally complete the preoperative evaluation of the patients, revealing in most cases a mass originating from esophagus without mediastinal lymphadenopathy (Fig 3). Preoperative biopsy of the tumor is a debating issue . Our policy is not to recommend it, because an esophageal leak or fistula can occur with a risk of potential mediastinitis. Moreover, in many cases fine needle aspiration could not provide enough material to establish an accurate histopathological diagnosis. The high risk of complications in combination with the small benefit for the patient suggests not to perform this diagnostic procedure, although other investigators recommend Fine Needle Biopsy via endoscopic ultrasonography.
Different kinds of approaches have been described depended from the location of the tumor. In the majority of the cases the tumor is discovered at the mean or the distal third of the esophagus. Right thoracotomy is suggested in first case; while a left thoracoabdominal approach fits better the second case . Our experience shows that using a right postolateral thoracotomy, excision of the lesion is feasible in both locations. Myotomy of esophagus and extramucosal enucleation of the leiomyoma is the standard and established procedure. The external muscular layer of esophagus is incised longitudinally. Dissection and excision of the tumor with great care not to open the mucosa completes the surgical procedure. If mucosa is penetrated, careful reapproximation with absorbable sutures takes place, while closure of the muscle layers is obligatory, in order to prevent leak. A lung or pleural flap graft may be used in order to seal a potential leakage. In very few cases resection of part of esophagus is described for large tumors [2, 10]. In our opinion, enucleation of the tumor is the only indicated surgical approach of the leiomyoma. Esophagogastrectomy remains the operation of choice exclusively when dealing with esophageal cancer. It is a major operation with concomitant morbidity and mortality due to its possible severe complications.
In conclusion, leiomyoma is a rare benign tumor of esophagus. Correct preoperative evaluation is of great importance in planning of the surgical excision. Enucleation of the lesion using a right postolateral thoracotomy is the most common approach. Postoperative complications are rare, while morbidity and mortality rates tend to be zero universally. Patients' relief from the symptoms is the rule and the prognosis is expected great.
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of this article and accompanying images. Copies of the written consents are available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Mutrie CJ, Donahue DM, Wain JC, Wright CD, Gaissert HA, Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ, Allan JS: Esophageal leiomyoma: a 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 1122-5. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Zhang R, Ouyang Z, Zhang D, Wang L, Zhang D: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2002, 24: 394-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chak A: EUS in submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 56 (Suppl 4): S43-48. 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70085-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Sun Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Wang Z: Transesophageal intraluminal ultrasonography in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi. 2002, 82: 456-458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier JP: Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut. 2000, 46: 88-92. 10.1136/gut.46.1.88.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levine MS, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buetow PC, Lowry MA, Sobin LH: Esophageal leiomyomatosis. Radiology. 1996, 199: 533-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosch T, Kapfer B, Will U, Baronius W, Strobel M, Lorenz R, Ulm K: Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002, 37: 856-862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waxman I, Saitoh Y, Raju GS, Watari J, Yokota K, Reeves AL, Kohgo Y: High-frequency probe EUS-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection: a therapeutic strategy for submucosal tumors of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 55: 44-49. 10.1067/mge.2002.119871.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Punpale A, Rangole A, Bhambhani N, Karimundackal G, Desai N, de Souza A, Pramesh CS, Jambhekar N, Mistry RC: Leiomyoma of Esophagus. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007, 13: 78-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonavina L, Segalin A, Rosati R, Pavanello M, Peracchia A: Surgical therapy of esophageal leiomyoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1995, 181: 257-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch. 2001, 438: 1-12. 10.1007/s004280000338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.