- Case report
- Open Access
Late recurrence of large peri-stomal metastasis following abdomino-perineal resection of rectal cancer
© Vijayasekar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 20 December 2007
Accepted: 05 September 2008
Published: 05 September 2008
Cutaneous metastasis from colorectal cancer after excision of the primary is a rare occurrence and presents as cutaneous or subcutaneous nodules or as a rash commonly on the anterior abdominal wall.
This is a case description of the management of a large fungating peristomal cutaneous metastasis occurring 14 years after abdomino-perineal excision of the primary cancer. The gross appearance initially suggested possibility of a true metachronous cancer with peristomal spread. But histopathology of the resected specimen showed no colonic mucosal involvement suggesting a true large cutaneous peristomal metastasis which has not been reported previously. Literature review of presentation, management and prognosis of cutaneous metastasis from colorectal cancer is described
Cutaneous metastasis following colorectal cancer resection is a well-recognised entity though rare. Any unusual skin lesions especially on the abdominal wall skin, previous incision scars or near the stoma should be biopsied early to rule out metastatic disease and systematic work-up should be carried out to rule out any metachronous tumour or metastasis elsewhere in the body.
Cutaneous metastasis arising from colorectal malignancy is a rare occurrence though well reported in literature. It is a pointer to more widespread disease and usually indicates a poor prognosis. Cutaneous metastasis can be the presenting feature before the primary is diagnosed e.g. Sister Mary Joseph's nodules. They can also occur late after the primary has been completely excised and can present either as cutaneous rash or as subcutaneous nodules in proximity to previous operative scars (abdominal or perineal) or on the abdominal wall skin. This is an unusual presentation of a large fungating peristomal metastasis without any visceral involvement following abdomino-perineal excision of a large T4 rectal cancer done 14 years earlier.
A 61 year old lady was referred by the General Practitioner as an emergency with a rapidly enlarging fungating mass around her end-colostomy site. She had undergone an abdomino-perineal resection 14 years earlier for a Duke's B rectal cancer. She had initially presented 14 years ago with features of large bowel obstruction secondary to a large rectal tumour. She had a defunctioning loop colostomy constructed followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to shrink the rectal tumour. At the time of the Abdomino-perineal Resection, the tumour was adherent to the uterus and she underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy with partial vaginectomy to achieve full surgical clearance. Histopathology of the original specimen revealed a T4 tumour with clear margins and no lymph node involvement. No chemotherapy was given after surgery.
Stomal recurrence following abdomino-perineal resection of a rectal cancer would indicate a metachronous tumour arising from the colonic mucosa. This is well reported in world literature with at least 10 cases described [1–3]. This may present as a stomal stricture, peristomal rash or ulceration, or as a peristomal mass. The time of presentation of the metachronous tumour can be 4 to 30 years following the original resection of the primary . In the present case, initially the clinical and CT appearances seemed to fit in with a metachronous tumour, explaining the reason for doing a completion colectomy and wide local excision of the mass en bloc. However, the histopathology of the specimen clearly shows normal colonic mucosa from caecum to the stoma with only some ulceration at the stoma site, precluding a metachronous tumour. This suggests a true isolated metastasis to the peristomal skin, as the pre-operative staging CT scan and the operative findings did not show any evidence of other visceral metastasis.
The incidence of cutaneous metastases associated with all cancers in both sexes is 0.7 to 9.0% . In Lookingbill's study of metastatic disease, the incidence of cutaneous metastasis in colorectal cancer was 4.4% . Colorectal metastases usually occur within 2 years of the primary tumour resection and the common organs involved are liver, peritoneum, pelvis, lung and bone in decreasing frequency . The clinicopathological risk factors for skin metastasis are primary tumours that extend transmurally through the wall of the colon or rectum, lymph node metastases at presentation and perforated primary tumour . The commonest site of cutaneous metastasis in colorectal cancer is the abdominal wall skin . They can arise in previous surgical scars (abdominal or perineal) including colostomy reversal scar . Rarely this may occur in the skin of the lower limbs, face or back [8, 9]. The gross appearance of skin metastasis is usually of small subcutaneous nodules, which are under 5 cms in size, or as superficial cutaneous papules. It can present rarely as an inflammatory rash which can be confused with primary skin conditions [10, 11].
Rarely colorectal metastasis may present as a large cutaneous or subcutaneous mass (> 5 cms). Alexandrescu et al described 2 cases of large cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases (11 cms and 5 cms) presenting in the abdominal incision scars occurring 5 and 3 years respectively after the primary tumour resection . At the time of reporting, the patient had survived for 22 and 12 months respectively after wide local excision, without any other metastatic involvement. Tan et al. described inflammatory subcutaneous mass > 10 cms diameter appearing 22 months after primary resection, growing in size rapidly on the scapular region within a documented period of 1 month duration . This was successfully excised but no information is available regarding the survival period. Greenberg et al reported a case of peristomal erythema, ulceration and induration appearing 6 months after abdomino-perineal resection which on shave biopsy turned out to be metastatic disease and a tiny primary focus was found in the resected stump suggesting a true synchronous tumour (< 1 year of primary resection) with peristomal cutaneous metastasis .
Our case is unique due to the size (> 10 cms), location (proximity to colostomy) and the time interval after resection of the primary (14 years). One of the possible mechanisms of spread of the tumour from the rectum to the colostomy site could be via the lymphatic channels in continuity with the loop colostomy that was constructed prior to the patient undergoing the abdomino-perineal excision. The second possibility is for micro-metastasis left behind in lymph nodes along the inferior mesenteric artery pedicle at the time of the abdomino-perineal resection. No specific mention was made in the initial operative notes of the curative or palliative intent of the operation, and if a high tie was carried out (ligation the inferior mesenteric artery flush with the aorta). This could lead to lymph node metastasis developing at a later date and could break through the skin presenting as a fungating mass. Histopathology did not reveal any evidence of lymphoid tissue either in the resected mass or in the remaining mesocolon of the completion colectomy to support these possible lymphatic routes. The third possible mechanism is by iatrogenic implantation of the colorectal cancer cells at the time of initial surgery. This is a well recognised problem and can present as metastatic recurrence in the midline incisions, perineal wounds, port sites and drain sites following surgery. The incidence of wound recurrence following open resection of colorectal cancer was 0.8% to 1.5% in two large series of total of 3314 patients and 80% of these recurrences occurred within 12 months of the initial surgery [15, 16]. The trauma of surgery results in an inflammatory response which has been shown to enhance the successful implantation of exfoliated tumour cells in animal models. This may be a consequence of enhanced tumor cell adhesion or transient generalised immune suppression following surgery . Tumour cell implantation could be the likely cause of metastatic recurrence in our case.
The survival period following diagnosis of cutaneous colorectal metastasis is 1 to 34 months. Lookingbill et al found a mean survival period of 18 months in 18 patients with skin metastases from colorectal carcinoma . In the series by Saeed et al. the survival period was 2 to 4.5 months in 5 cases of colonic cancer . There are case reports of patients surviving 4 years and 10.5 years following treatment of isolated metastsasis . The prognosis of cutaneous metastasis would depend on the presence of concomitant metastasis elsewhere at the time of diagnosis and also on the surgical clearance achieved if found to be true isolated metastasis. Tumour differentiation and lymphovascular invasion are also important factors in altering the prognosis.
Wide local excision of the cutaneous or subcutaneous lesion is the preferred treatment option in isolated lesions. There are no clear guidelines for the optimum chemotherapeutic regimen for a non-resectable recurrence of colorectal cancer. Focal radiotherapy has been tried for cutaneous rash with poor response [8, 11]. The chemotherapy treatments described include 5-fluorouracil , capecitabine , irinotecan , oxaliplatin [6, 11, 14] and cisplatin . The chemotherapy drugs have evolved from a single agent 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as the first line agent to the current combination of drugs. The combination of irinotecan to bolus 5-FU has increased median survival from 12 months to 14.8 months . The combination of infusional 5-FU and leucovorin(LV) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)  or infusional 5-FU/LV with irinotecan (FOLFIRI)  has increased this survival figure to above 20 months. Treating patients sequentially with FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX, or with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI, has increased the median survival times to 21.5 months and 20.6 months, respectively . Our patient was offered chemotherapy but she declined it. We intend to follow her up at 6 monthly intervals with CEA level estimations and cross sectional liver imaging.
Cutaneous metastasis following colorectal cancer resection is a well-recognised entity though rare. Any unusual skin lesions especially on the abdominal wall skin, previous incision scars or near the stoma should be biopsied early to rule out metastatic disease and systematic work-up should be carried out to rule out any metachronous tumour or metastasis elsewhere in the body. For isolated cutaneous or subcutaneous metastasis, wide local excision would be the preferred surgical option followed by adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the histopathological status.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
- Shibuya T, Uchiyama K, Kokuma M, Shioya T, Watanabe Y, Moriyama Y, Matsumoto K, Yokosuka I: Metachronous adenocarcinoma occurring at a colostomy site after abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2002, 37 (5): 387-390. 10.1007/s005350200054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chintamani, Singhal V, Bansal A, Bhatnagar D, Saxena S: Isolated colostomy site recurrence in rectal cancer-two cases with review of literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2007, 5: 52-10.1186/1477-7819-5-52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Townley WA, Kothari MS, Meyrick-Thomas J: Metachronous stomal adenocarcinoma following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005, 87 (6): e1-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz RA: Cutaneous metastatic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995, 33 (2 Pt 1): 161-82; quiz 183-6. 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90231-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lookingbill DP, Spangler N, Helm KF: Cutaneous metastases in patients with metastatic carcinoma: a retrospective study of 4020 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993, 29 (2 Pt 1): 228-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarid D, Wigler N, Gutkin Z, Merimsky O, Leider-Trejo L, Ron IG: Cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases of rectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2004, 9 (3): 202-205. 10.1007/s10147-004-0389-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koea JB, Lanouette N, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Cohen AM: Abdominal wall recurrence after colorectal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000, 43 (5): 628-632. 10.1007/BF02235576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stavrianos SD, McLean NR, Kelly CG, Fellows S: Cutaneous metastasis to the head and neck from colonic carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000, 26 (5): 518-519. 10.1053/ejso.1999.0935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adani GL, Marcello D, Anania G, Mazzetti J, Jorizzo EF, Maestroni U, Donini A: Subcutaneous right leg metastasis from rectal adenocarcinoma without visceral involvement. Chir Ital. 2001, 53 (3): 405-407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damin DC, Lazzaron AR, Tarta C, Cartel A, Rosito MA: Massive zosteriform cutaneous metastasis from rectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol. 2003, 7 (2): 105-107. 10.1007/s10151-003-0019-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong NS, Chang BM, Toh HC, Koo WH: Inflammatory metastatic carcinoma of the colon: a case report and review of the literature. Tumori. 2004, 90 (2): 253-255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alexandrescu DT, Vaillant J, Yahr LJ, Kelemen P, Wiernik PH: Unusually large colon cancer cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases occurring in resection scars. Dermatol Online J. 2005, 11 (2): 22-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tan KY, Ho KS, Lai JH, Lim JF, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW: Cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006, 35 (8): 585-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenberg HL, Lopez L, Butler DF: Peristomal metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Arch Dermatol. 2006, 142 (10): 1372-1373. 10.1001/archderm.142.10.1372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Polglase AL, Johnson WR: Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983, 26 (9): 571-572. 10.1007/BF02552962.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand HS, Bolton J, O'Connell MJ: Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996, 39 (2): 200-207. 10.1007/BF02068076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raa ST, Oosterling SJ, van der Kaaij NP, van den Tol MP, Beelen RH, Meijer S, van Eijck CH, van der Sijp JR, van Egmond M, Jeekel J: Surgery promotes implantation of disseminated tumor cells, but does not increase growth of tumor cell clusters. J Surg Oncol. 2005, 92 (2): 124-129. 10.1002/jso.20273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saeed S, Keehn CA, Morgan MB: Cutaneous metastasis: a clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical appraisal. J Cutan Pathol. 2004, 31 (6): 419-430. 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2004.00207.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Demetriades H, Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Christoforidis E, Betsis D: Abdominal wall metastasis following treatment of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2004, 8 Suppl 1: s101-3. 10.1007/s10151-004-0125-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL: Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343 (13): 905-914. 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, Fuchs CS, Ramanathan RK, Williamson SK, Findlay BP, Pitot HC, Alberts SR: A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (1): 23-30. 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohne CH, van Cutsem E, Wils J, Bokemeyer C, El-Serafi M, Lutz MP, Lorenz M, Reichardt P, Ruckle-Lanz H, Frickhofen N, Fuchs R, Mergenthaler HG, Langenbuch T, Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Voigtmann R, Muller L, Genicot B, Anak O, Nordlinger B: Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (22): 4856-4865. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, Quinaux E, Couteau C, Buyse M, Ganem G, Landi B, Colin P, Louvet C, de Gramont A: FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (2): 229-237. 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.