- Case report
- Open Access
The Merendino procedure following preoperative imatinib mesylate for locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the esophagogastric junction
© Staiger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 19 November 2007
Accepted: 04 April 2008
Published: 04 April 2008
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of the esophagogastric junction might pose a major problem to surgical resection. If locally advanced, extended or multivisceral resection with relevant procedural-specific morbidity and mortality is often necessary.
We report a case of a patient with a locally advanced GIST of the esophagogastric junction who was treated by transhiatal resection of the lower esophagus and gastric cardia with reconstruction by interposition of segment of the jejunum (Merendino procedure). Prior to resection, downsizing of the tumor had successfully been achieved by treatment with imatinib mesylate for six months. Histological proof of GIST by immunohistochemical expression of c-KIT and/or PDGF alpha Receptor is crucial to allow embarking on this treatment strategy.
A multimodal approach for an advanced GIST of the esophagogastric junction with preoperative administration of imatinib mesylate could avoid extended resection. The Merendino procedure might be considered as the reconstruction method of choice after resection of GIST at this location.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), although relatively rare, are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Recently, GISTs were defined by the characteristic expression of the c-Kit protooncogene (CD117) and specific histological and immunohistochemical criteria . It has been postulated, that the so called interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) are related to GIST tumors. ICCs are part of the autonomic nervous system regulating the peristalsis of the GI tract. Others hypothesize that GIST originate from primitive (stem) cells in the GI tract, which then can develop into an ICC .
The population-based annual incidence of GISTs is estimated with 14.5 per million for Sweden, but the figure may also contain GISTs detected incidentally and at autopsy . In the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) data from 1992 to 2000 the age-adjusted yearly incidence rate was 6.8 per million . The median age at diagnosis has been reported to be 55 to 65 years . The incidence of GIST is not known for all populations, most data refer to Caucasian industrialized populations.
In the past, surgery was the only effective treatment for localized GIST. Radiotherapy has been applied without success and the response rates of standard chemotherapy regimes in series published before 2000 have been very poor and could not prevent early relapse and tumor related death in metastasized patients. The introduction of the molecular-targeted therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate (STI571, Glivec®, Novartis) in 2001 significantly improved the outcome especially in patients with advanced and metastasized disease [6, 7]. Imatinib mesylate is a selective small molecule receptor inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including c-Kit which was initially approved for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia harbouring c-Kit and BRC-ABL mutations. Following the demonstration of an objective response in more than 50% of the treated patients with GISTs, imatinib mesylate became rapidly the therapy of choice for unresectable or metastatic GIST . The therapy is well tolerated with mild side effects diminishing with continuous treatment.
Although GIST can arise everywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, they most often occur in the stomach (50% to 60%). About 20% to 30% of GISTs develop in the small intestine. GIST of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or distal esophagus are rare with less than 5% and have been described only in small series or case reports [9, 10]. Small GISTs of the esophagus often are handled by gastroenterologists with an endoscopic surveillance strategy or sometimes endoscopic resection. Due to a main extraluminal growth GIST can reach a size of up to 15 cm prior to diagnosis. Then however, the tumors are often treated like carcinoma of the GEJ with extensive surgery and lymphadenectomy such as abdomino-thoracic or transhiatal esophageal resection. The preferred method of reconstruction is esophagogastric anastomosis with considerable subsequent morbidity [11, 12]. As GISTs usually do not metastasize to lymph nodes, a less radical approach could be considered. However, large tumor size and peritumorous neoangiogenesis often make a limited but complete resection difficult. In this setting, cytoreduction and regression of the peritumorous neoangiogenesis through imatinib mesylate therapy with neoadjuvant intent may decrease the risk of tumor rupture and bleeding and increase the likelihood of potential curative resection.
We report the case of a patient with a locally advanced GIST of the GEJ who was first treated by imatinib mesylate followed by tumor removal with limited resection and interposition of a segment of the jejunum (Merendino procedure).
A 51-year-old male was referred to our hospital with dysphagia and recurrent upper abdominal discomfort. Apart from arterial hypertension, no significant medical history was reported. Endoscopy detected an ulcerous lesion dorsal at the GEJ (figure 1), however, biopsies did not prove malignant disease. Deep biopsies lead to the histopathological diagnosis of a GIST in the GEJ. High-resolution multislice computerized tomography (CT) showed a solid tumor measuring 7.6 cm extending from the distal esophagus to the gastric cardia and fundus with extension into of the left diaphragmatic muscular column and the splenic hilus (figure 2). Surgery with curative intent at this stage would have required a multivisceral resection by an abdomino-thoracic approach, including resection of the left diaphragmatic muscle as well as splenectomy. After thorough discussion of the treatment options, the patient consented to try to downstage the tumor first by neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate followed by surgery after three to six months.
Staging and neoadjuvant treatment
First reported in 1998, most GISTs are characterized by an oncogenic mutation in the Kit tyrosine kinase (CD 117), allowing spontaneous (ligand-independent) receptor dimerization and kinase activation [13, 14]. The c-Kit expression distinguishes GISTs from tumors of smooth muscle cells. GISTs are the most common non-epithelial tumors of the GI tract. The diagnosis of GIST has dramatically increased since 1992, and survival has dramatically improved since 2002. Size and mitotic count are the most prognostic features and are used for risk stratification . All tumors larger than 2 cm have a risk of recurrence and tumor exceeding 5 cm should be considered potentially malignant.
Initial treatment of localized GIST should aim at complete resection of the tumor with margins of 1–2 cm. Segmental resection of small bowel or colon is adequate, no lymphatic dissection is required. Small tumors (< 3 cm) of the stomach could be excised by a laparoscopic approach . Larger tumors request functional gastric resection like antrectomy or resection of the gastric fundus with tube forming . Locoregionally advanced tumors or those poorly positioned requiring total gastrectomy or other extended resection should be considered for neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate and afterwards re-evaluated for resection [18, 19]. The response rate to be expected from drug therapy is 75% to 80%. It is reasonable to consider the disease as initially as "unresectable" without incurring risk of unacceptable morbidity or functional deficit and therefore to use imatinib mesylate therapy as the first-line anticancer therapy.
In our case, primary resection would have necessitated a multivisceral resection including the distal part of the esophagus, the proximal stomach, spleen and a part of the diaphragm to remove the tumor without contamination and clear margins. After pre-treatment with imatinib mesylate and relevant tumor shrinkage segmental resection was possible. Reconstruction of the upper part of the GI tract after resection of carcinoma of the GEJ usually necessitates esophago-gastrostomy or a Roux-en-Y procedure. Both are often followed by considerable postoperative morbidity mainly due to acidic or biliary esophageal reflux. Dumping syndrome and weight loss are sequelae of excluding the duodenal passage . For locally advanced carcinomas of the esophagus and the GEJ requiring extended lymph node dissection this procedural specific morbidity and mortality is accepted.
Unlike, the resection of GIST tumors does not require lymph node dissection. For these reasons GIST of the GEJ should be treated by limited resection and optimal functional reconstruction if the size of the tumor allow. In 1955, Merendino and Dillard published a technique to reconstruct the esophagogastric passage and to prevent reflux and esophagitis following resection of the GEJ . Initially, the procedure was developed for a variety of benign diseases like severe esophagitis, stricture or cardiospasm. In its final version, the operation consists of the interposition of an isoperistaltic segment of jejunum between the esophagus and stomach, with bilateral vagotomy and a pyloroplasty. In a series of patients who underwent this operation the mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index did not differ from that of healthy controls . We regard the Merendino procedure as an ideal indication for resectable GIST of the proximal stomach or GEJ. In our case, the clinical response to imatinib mesylate with tumor shrinkage prevented an abdomino-thoracic approach with multivisceral resection and allowed a reconstruction of a functional competent GEJ.
Neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate for locally advanced GIST represents a not yet fully established strategy to handle large GIST that can be resected only with curative intent by major procedures accompanied with organ function loss, i.e. Whipple' procedure for GIST of the duodenum or abdomino-perineal excision for GIST of the rectum or recto-vaginal septum. Two phase II trials currently explore this option in a standardized fashion. The study of the RTOG S-0132 initially used 8 weeks (now 3 months) treatment with imatinib mesylate at 400 mg daily upfront to resection. The so-called Apollon study (CSTI571 BDE43) foresees 6 months of pre-treatment. It is still matter of debate whether treatment with imatinib mesylate should be continued postoperatively. The experience of several centers [, BFR14 study] as well as the guidelines of the NCCN recommend a minimum treatment period with imatinib mesylate of 12 months, thus we continued therapy after recovery in our patient. Response to treatment fulfilling the criteria of a partial remission according to RECIST criteria  requires 3–6 months of therapy . Therefore special criteria of contrast media uptake in CT or MRI have been established [26, 27]. Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-desoxyglucose (FDG) is an ideal tool to monitor treatment effects as it demonstrates shut-down of the tumor metabolism as early as 24 h or 72 hours . In case CT does not show tumor shrinkage early, treatment can be continued safely if PET documents stop of proliferative activity. Also in our patient, 18F-FDG PET was antecedent to CT in demonstrating response to imatinib mesylate and allowed us to complete the full course of preoperative therapy. PET otherwise has been used successfully in epithelial cancer of the esophagus to evaluate treatment with preoperative radiochemotherapy .
Combined modality therapy of preoperative imatinib mesylate downstaging of a GIST of the GEJ with limited resection and reconstruction by a interposition of a jejunal segment resulted in an R0 resection and excellent functional outcome of the patient.
To the patient, who has willingly provided written consent and agreed for publishing this case report
- Coindre JM, Emile JF, Monges G, Ranchere-Vince D, Scoazec JY: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: definition, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features, and diagnostic strategy. Ann Pathol. 2005, 25: 358-385. 10.1016/S0242-6498(05)80145-2. quiz 357View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirota S, Isozaki K: Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Pathol Int. 2006, 56: 1-9. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.02036.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Oden A, Dortok A, Gustavsson B, Sablinska K, Kindblom LG: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era – a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer. 2005, 103: 821-829. 10.1002/cncr.20862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB: The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005, 100: 162-168. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40709.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reichardt P, Pink D, Mrozek A, Lindner T, Hohenberger P: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Z Gastroenterol. 2004, 42: 327-331. 10.1055/s-2004-812691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, Morgan JA, George S, Zahrieh D, Fletcher CD, Demetri GD, Bertagnolli MM: Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 2325-2331. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez EA, Livingstone AS, Franceschi D, Rocha-Lima C, Lee DJ, Hodgson N, Jorda M, Koniaris LG: Current incidence and outcomes of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors including gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2006, 202: 623-629. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Heinrich MC, Tuveson DA, Singer S, Janicek M, Fletcher JA, Silverman SG, Silberman SL, Capdeville R, Kiese B, Peng B, Dimitrijevic S, Druker BJ, Corless C, Fletcher CD, Joensuu H: Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 472-480. 10.1056/NEJMoa020461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): definition, occurrence, pathology, differential diagnosis and molecular genetics. Pol J Pathol. 2003, 54: 3-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O'Leary TJ: Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999, 23: 82-87. 10.1097/00000478-199901000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blum MG, Bilimoria KY, Wayne JD, de Hoyos AL, Talamonti MS, Adley B: Surgical considerations for the management and resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007, 84: 1717-1723. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Sobin LH, Lasota J: Esophageal stromal tumors: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 17 cases and comparison with esophageal leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000, 24: 211-222. 10.1097/00000478-200002000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, Kawano K, Hanada M, Kurata A, Takeda M, Muhammad Tunio G, Matsuzawa Y, Kanakura Y, Shinomura Y, Kitamura Y: Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998, 279: 577-580. 10.1126/science.279.5350.577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006, 130: 1466-1478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW: Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002, 33: 459-465. 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT: Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg. 2006, 243: 738-745. 10.1097/01.sla.0000219739.11758.27. discussion 745-7PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hohenberger P, Reichardt P, Gebauer B, Wardelmann E: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) – current concepts of surgical management. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004, 129: 1817-1820. 10.1055/s-2004-829035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- NCCN guidelines. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/sarcoma.pdf
- Hohenberger P, Wardelmann E: Surgical considerations for gastrointestinal stroma tumor. Chirurg. 2006, 77: 33-40. 10.1007/s00104-005-1125-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gockel I, Pietzka S, Junginger T: Quality of life after subtotal resection and gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Chirurg. 2005, 76: 250-257. 10.1007/s00104-004-0950-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merendino KA, Dillard DH: The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg. 1955, 142: 486-506.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J, Werner M, Siewert JR: Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Ann Surg. 2000, 232: 733-742. 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rutkowski P, Nowecki Z, Nyckowski P, Dziewirski W, Grzesiakowska U, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Krawczyk M, Ruka W: Surgical treatment of patients with initially inoperable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) during therapy with imatinib mesylate. J Surg Oncol. 2006, 93: 304-311. 10.1002/jso.20466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 205-216. 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, LeCesne A, Reichardt P, Blay JY, Issels R, van Oosterom A, Hogendoorn PC, Van Glabbeke M, Bertulli R, Judson I: Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1127-1134. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17098-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stroszczynski C, Jost D, Reichardt P, Chmelik P, Gaffke G, Kretzschmar A, Schneider U, Felix R, Hohenberger P: Follow-up of gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST) during treatment with imatinib mesylate by abdominal MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005, 15: 2448-2456. 10.1007/s00330-005-2867-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi H, Charnsangavej C, de Castro Faria S, Tamm EP, Benjamin RS, Johnson MM, Macapinlac HA, Podoloff DA: CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: a quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004, 183: 1619-1628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stroobants S, Goeminne J, Seegers M, Dimitrijevic S, Dupont P, Nuyts J, Martens M, van den Borne B, Cole P, Sciot R, Dumez H, Silberman S, Mortelmans L, van Oosterom A: 18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec). Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 2012-2020. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00073-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ott K, Weber WA, Lordick F, Becker K, Busch R, Herrmann K, Wieder H, Fink U, Schwaiger M, Siewert JR: Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 4692-4698. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.