Application of light microscopical and ultrastructural immunohistochemistry in the study of goblet cell carcinoid in the appendix
© Gulubova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 23 May 2007
Accepted: 06 February 2008
Published: 06 February 2008
Goblet cell carcinoids appear less frequently in the appendix than do other carcinoids. In the presented work a case with a goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix is described.
Routine histological and histochemical methods were employed, with a combination of histochemistry and immunohistochemistry on one section and light and electron microscopical immunohistochemisty on paraffin-embedded material, were applied to identify the type of the carcinoid and to reveal the fine structure of cell types in the tumour nests of the appendix.
During the biopsy of a patient who had undergone appendectomy, an infiltration with clusters of goblet cells in the submucosa of the appendix was found. After a second operation of right-sided hemicolectomy, similar clusters of goblet cells were detected in the muscle layers of the caecum. After 18 months the patient died from cirrhosis and had not developed metastases or any recurrence. Immunohistochemically the serotonin-, somatostatin-, chromogranin A- and synaptophysin-positive endocrine cells were basally attached to mucin-secreting cells. The combined staining revealed simultaneously present endocrine cells (chromogranin-A-positive) and mucin-secreting cells (PAS- or alcian blue-positive). The ultrastructural immunohistochemistry showed that chromogranin A-positive cells had discoid and pleomorphic granules and were located in tumour nests or as single cells in the appendiceal wall.
The combined histochemical and immunohistochemical procedure and the ultrastructural immunohistochemistry on archival material could contribute in clarifying the diagnosis of goblet cell carcinoid.
In the last 30 years, histochemical, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic techniques were applied in the study of carcinoids of the appendix. With the aid of previously mentioned techniques an endocrine cell component has been detected in these tumours. In clinical aspect, published articles have predominantly addressed the diagnostic procedures, progression of, and therapy for the entity [1–4].
Goblet cell carcinoids appear in the appendix less frequently than other carcinoids (and constitute approximately 5% of all appendicle primary tumours) [1, 3, 5, 6]. The goblet cell carcinoid is characterized histologically by goblet cells or signet ring-like cells arranged in clusters, separated by smooth muscle or stroma [2, 3]. The endocrine cells are arranged basally in tumour glands . Goblet cell carcinoids were considered more aggressive than classical carcinoids [2, 3].
In order to determine the clinical behaviour for this tumour there existed several criteria such as low grade of differentiation, increased mitotic activity, invasion in the caecum, lymph nodes metastases and tumour size larger than 2 cm . The right hemicolectomy was prevalent in a number of patients with goblet cell carcinoid [7, 8]. In the last years an adjuvant chemotherapy was applied in the treatment of this type of carcinoid .
Almost all of the studies concerning precise diagnosis of goblet cell carcinoids, were histological and histochemical [1, 6], or immunohistochemical [2, 3, 10]. The endocrine component of that carcinoid was shown to be positive for chromogranin A, serotonin, glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide [2, 3, 10]. The data about the ultrastructural studies were scarce . We did not find an ultrastructural immunohistochemical study on this type of carcinoid published in English. Our report describes a combined histochemical and immunohistochemical technique and simultaneously presents the mucinous and the endocrine cell components of the goblet cell carcinoid on light microscopical paraffin sections. Ultrastructural immunohistochemistry on a paraffin-embedded specimen from goblet cell carcinoid was applied to reveal the fine structure of cell types in the tumour nests of the appendix.
A 60 year old man diagnosed as having an acute perforative appendicitis and periappendicular abscesses, was treated with surgery. The pathological diagnosis was a goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix (WHO histological classification 8243/3), infiltrating the mesoappendix. The macroscopic finding consisted in a slightly tight, oval area in the submucosa of the appendix, located near the caecum and measuring about 0.3 cm in diameter. Concomitant liver cirrhosis (proven hostologically) was observed. Light microscopical finding was present in many groups of goblet cells, separated by fibrous stroma in the submucosa and the muscle layer of the appendix. Small pools of mucin were found between the cell nests. Some tumour nests had central lumens, mimicking normal crypts.
After four months the patient was treated with a second operation, right-sided hemicolectomy. The macroscopic appearance of the colon was almost normal. Only slight induration was observed in the submucosa of the caecum, at the place of the previous appendiceal resection. Histologically, the muscle layer and the submucosa of the caecum were diffusely infiltrated by goblet cells arranged in clusters and separated by fibrous stroma. In the wall of the caecum single tumour cells and nests infiltrated the myenteric plexus. Nuclear atypism and mitoses were visible.
After the right-sided hemicolectomy the patient was treated with six courses of 5 fluorouracil and leucovorin. In the 18 month period image analysis did not reveal metastases or recurrence. The patient was admitted to the hospital where he died from decompensated liver cirrhosis resulting in variceal oesophageal bleeding and with an autopsy confirming no recurrence of tumour.
The sections were stained with hematoxyllin and eosin.
Mucins in the lumen of tumour nests and in the goblet cells stained positively with PAS reaction and alcian blue.
Light and electron microscopical immunohistochemistry
Earlier the floating section immunohistochemistry methodology was described . The two procedures were carried out simultaneously and according to the method of De Vos et al.  on samples embedded in paraffin. In brief: paraffin sections 5 μm thick for light microscopical immunohistochemistry mounted on slides and 40 – 60 μm thick for electron microscope immunohistochemistry were prepared. They were dewaxed twice in xylene for 30 minutes at 56°C, followed by descending ethanol series. The sections were then soaked overnight in 10% sucrose solution at 4°C. The sections were also incubated in 1.2% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, and rinsed in phosphate balanced solution (PBS), pH 7.4, for 15 min. The sections were then blocked for 30 min with normal mouse serum (DAKO). After incubating with the primary mouse (rabbit) anti-human antibodies overnight, the cryostat sections were washed in PBS and incubated with a secondary anti-mouse (rabbit) biotinylated antibody (DAKO) for 4 h, and subsequently with the streptavidin-HRP complex (DAKO) for 4 h, rinsed in PBS, and then in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, for 10 min. The reaction was made visible by using a mixture of 3 mg 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (DAKO), in 15 ml 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, and 36 μl 1% hydrogen peroxide for 10–20 min, and rinsed in PBS.
After dehydration the paraffin sections were mounted with entellan for light microscopy. For better visualization of the DAB reaction product the sections were not counterstained. Sections incubated with non-immune sera instead of the primary antibodies were used as negative controls.
The free floating sections (40–60 μm thick) were postfixed in PBS containing 2% osmium tetroxide for 30 min at 2°C, followed by a rinse in PBS. Finally, sections were dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol and propylene oxide, and flat-embedded with Durcupan, between celophane sheets. Ultrathin sections were cut from areas with immune reactive endocrine cells visible on cellophane preparations. For better visualization of the DAB reaction product they were not counterstained with uranyl acetate. Ultrathin sections were examined and photographed with an OPTON EM 109 electron microscope at 50 kV.
A combined histochemical and immunohistochemical staining
After deparaffinization the 5 μm thick sections were stained first with PAS-reaction or with toluidine blue. Then, the preparations were not mounted with Kanada balsam. They were hydrated in PBS, pH 7.4 for 10 min. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 1.2% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, and rinsed in PBS, pH 7.4, for 15 min. Then, the sections were incubated overnight with the rabbit anti-human chromogranin A, or with the mouse anti-human serotonin. After washing them in PBS, pH 7.4, incubation with a secondary anti- rabbit (mouse) biotinylated antibody (DAKO) for 4 h was done, and subsequently with the streptavidin-HRP complex (DAKO) for 4 h. They were rinsed in PBS, pH 7.4, and then in 0.05 M Tris-HCL buffer, pH 7.5, for 10 min. Finally the reaction was developed with DAB solution as was described above. The sections were mounted with entellan. The pink or blue colour of mucins (PAS or alciane blue) remained visible. Brown endocrine cells could be observed at the basement membrane, beneath goblet cells in the nests.
The antibodies used were: rabbit anti-human chromogranin A (N1535), rabbit anti-human synaptophysin (N1566), mouse anti-human synaptophysin (U0037), rabbit anti-human somatostatin (N1551), and mouse anti-human serotonin (N1530), all obtained from DAKO A/S Denmark. The rabbit anti-human gastrin (PA019-5P), rabbit anti-human bombesin (PA062-5P), rabbit anti-human secretin (PA067-5P) and rabbit anti-human β-endorphin (PA063-5P) were obtained from BioGenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA, USA. The detection system used was DAKO LSAB®2 System, HRP (K0675), and DAKO®DAB Chromogen tablets (S3000) (DAKO A/S Denmark).
Light microscopic immunohistochemistry
A combined histochemical and immunohistochemical staining
In the appendix goblet cell carcinoids appear less frequently than conventional carcinoids . A review of appendiceal tumours set their incidence at only 5% of occurring appendiceal primary tumours . A small number of goblet cell carcinoids have been already described: 30 cases ; 13 cases ; 10 cases ; 33 cases . The existence of this entity is well documented  and many immunohistochemical and some ultrastructural studies have been reported [2, 3, 10, 11].
The goblet cell carcinoid shares histological features with adenocarcinoma (abundant mucin production) and with conventional intestinal carcinoids (endocrine cells). In our case the neoplastic elements were located in the submucosa, as are conventional carcinoids . In contradiction to adenocarcinoma the mucosa was free of malignant changes.
Our patient first had symptoms of acute appendicitis, as was found in most cases described in existing literature . Our 60 year old patient conformed to the median age of patients with such tumours, as literature reports as being over 54.1 years old. The other carcinoid types in the appendix occurred in patients of approximately 40 years old .
In our case the surgical resection of the right colon was based on histological data of submucosal infiltration of the appendiceal wall, upon the finding of mitoses and nuclear atypism . The histological appearance of the tumour in our case is identical with previously described, like tumours (goblet cells arranged in clusters and separated by connective tissue stroma) [2, 3, 6]. The presence of mucin secretion in the goblet cells was confirmed by stained PAS-reaction and with toluidine blue, as was aforementioned [3, 6].
The immunohistochemical analyses showed endocrine cells, immunoreactive for serotonin, somatostatin and for the pan endocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin, which were dispersed among the groups of goblet cells infiltrating the submucosa and muscle layer of appendix. Similar clusters of goblet cells and immunoreative endocrine cells were also found in the wall of the ceacum.
Goblet cell carcinoids display no clear distinguishing immunohistochemical pattern [2, 3]. In our case the appendiceal tumour was diffusely positive for chromogranin A, serotonin and synaptophysin. Somatostatin immunoreactivity was found in scattered cells. It is known that tubular carcinoid is stained weakly for chromogranin A , while goblet cell carcinoids are stained more intensively for the same substance . Irregular serotonin and somatostatin immunoreactivity in these tumours was reported earlier [3, 10]. To our knowledge synaptophysin immunoreactivity was not investigated in goblet cell carcinoids. Synaptophysin like chromogranin is a universal marker of neuroendocrine cells . We observed a diffuse synaptophysin immune reaction in the endocrine cells of the goblet cell carcinoid. Synaptophysin immunoreactivity was visualized also ultrastructurally in cells with granules of the EC2 type.
Ultrastructural examination revealed tumour nests with well-differentiated mucus-producing cells delineated by 2–3 endocrine cells with basement membrane location. The nests were in the submucosa. The endocrine cells were attached to goblet cells or were dispersed as single cells in the appendiceal wall. Electron microscopic examination of our case failed to reveal existence of cells that contain both mucin and secretary granules within their cytoplasm. Therefore we agree with the hypothesis of the dual entodermal and neuroendocrine origin of goblet cell carcinoid . The ultrastructural investigation showed that in morphology the endocrine cells were from the EC2 type with discoid and pleomorphic granules  or from the D type with small electron-dense ovoid granules . We found that chromogranin A marked the endocrine cells from these two types. The ultrastructural immunohistochemistry carried out in the current study was performed on archival materials from paraffin blocks. In this respect, we suggest this method as a suitable tool to study the hormonal nature of goblet cell carcinoids, the location of hormones and the phenotype of endocrine cells.
Another useful method for simultaneous revealing of mucin secretion and endocrine cell component of the tumour on archival paraffin blocks is the combined PAS/alcian blue/chromogranin A staining, applied in our current work. Earlier, Hosaka et al.  had used a similar combination of immunohistochemical (with anti-chromogranin A) and histochemical (PAS/alcian blue) method for a simultaneous detection of endocrine cells and mucin-secreting cells, to present a case with an early-stage colon adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. These authors first performed the immunohistochemical procedure and then counterstained sections with the PAS/alcian blue solution. We transposed the procedures. We first made PAS or alcian blue staining and then the immunohistochemistry. We demonstrated that the immunohistochemical procedure could be performed on previously PAS or alciane blue stained sections, allowing use of immunohistochemistry on archival sections, where paraffin blocks were lost or cut out. The use of combined special histochemical staining methods and immune reactions showed that the mucin-containing goblet cells were sharply delineated from the endocrine cells.
Based on our results we find out that apart from the described serotonin-, somatostatin- and chromogranin A-positive endocrine cells, the goblet cell carcinoid contains also synaptophysin-positive endocrine cells. The ultrastructural immunohistochemistry showed mainly cells from the EC2 or D type. The combined histochemical and immunohistochemical procedure delves a greater possibility for revealing the dual nature of goblet cell carcinoide.
This work was done with the financial support of a research project from 2007, funded by the Medical Faculty of Trakia University, Bulgaria.
Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
- Warkel RL, Cooper PH, Helwig EB: Adenocarcinoid, a mucin-producing carcinoid tumor of the appendix: a study of 39 cases. Cancer. 1978, 42 (6): 2781-2793. 10.1002/1097-0142(197812)42:6<2781::AID-CNCR2820420638>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burke AP, Sobin LH, Federspiel BH, Shekitka KM, Helwig EB: Goblet cell carcinoids and related tumors of the vermiform appendix. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990, 94 (1): 27-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Capella C, La Rosa S, Uccella S, Billo P, Cornaggia M: Mixed endocrine-exocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000, 17 (2): 91-103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberg K, Astrup L, Eriksson B, Falkmer SE, Falkmer UG, Gustafsen J, Haglund C, Knigge U, Vatn MH, Valimaki M: Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (including bronchopulmonary and thymic neoplasms). Part I-general overview. Acta Oncol. 2004, 43 (7): 617-625. 10.1080/02841860410018575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burke AP, Sobin LH, Federspiel BH, Shekitka KM: Appendiceal carcinoids: correlation of histology and immunohistochemistry. Mod Pathol. 1989, 2 (6): 630-637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edmonds P, Merino MJ, LiVolsi VA, Duray PH: Adenocarcinoid (mucinous carcinoid) of the appendix. Gastroenterology. 1984, 86 (2): 302-309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berardi RS, Lee SS, Chen HP: Goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988, 167 (1): 81-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pahlavan PS, Kanthan R: Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix. World J Surg Oncol. 2005, 3: 36-10.1186/1477-7819-3-36.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stancu M, Wu TT, Wallace C, Houlihan PS, Hamilton SR, Rashid A: Genetic alterations in goblet cell carcinoids of the vermiform appendix and comparison with gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Mod Pathol. 2003, 16 (12): 1189-1198. 10.1097/01.MP.0000097362.10330.B1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carr NJ, Remotti H, Sobin LH: Dual carcinoid/epithelial neoplasia of the appendix. Histopathology. 1995, 27 (6): 557-562. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1995.tb00327.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper PH, Warkel RL: Ultrastructure of the goblet cell type of adenocarcinoid of the appendix. Cancer. 1978, 42 (6): 2687-2695. 10.1002/1097-0142(197812)42:6<2687::AID-CNCR2820420625>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gulubova MV, Vlaykova T: Tenascin immunoreactivity in the large bowel and the liver in patients with colorectal cancer. Histochem J. 2001, 33 (2): 111-120. 10.1023/A:1017952331618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Vos R, De Wolf-Peeters C, van den Oord JJ, Desmet V: A recommended procedure for ultrastructural immunohistochemistry on small human tissue samples. J Histochem Cytochem. 1985, 33 (9): 959-964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones RA, MacFarlane A: Carcinomas and carcinoid tumours of the appendix in a district general hospital. J Clin Pathol. 1976, 29 (8): 687-692. 10.1136/jcp.29.8.687.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanthan R, Saxena A, Kanthan SC: Goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix: immunophenotype and ultrastructural study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001, 125 (3): 386-390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH: Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998. Cancer. 2002, 94 (12): 3307-3312. 10.1002/cncr.10589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grabowski P, Schonfelder J, Ahnert-Hilger G, Foss HD, Heine B, Schindler I, Stein H, Berger G, Zeitz M, Scherubl H: Expression of neuroendocrine markers: a signature of human undifferentiated carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Virchows Arch. 2002, 441 (3): 256-263. 10.1007/s00428-002-0650-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujimiya M, Okumiya K, Kuwahara A: Immunoelectron microscopic study of the luminal release of serotonin from rat enterochromaffin cells induced by high intraluminal pressure. Histochem Cell Biol. 1997, 108 (2): 105-113. 10.1007/s004180050151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steel JH, Bishop AE: Molecular approaches to neuroendocrine pathology. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1997, 16 (1-2): 179-205. 10.1023/A:1005712828667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hosaka S, Matsuzawa K, Maruyama K, Ota H, Akamatsu T, Kiyosawa K: Rapid four-month growth of an early-stage adenocarcinoma of the colon with neuroendocrine characteristics. Dig Dis Sci. 2003, 48 (2): 295-298. 10.1023/A:1021923325881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.