- Technical innovations
- Open Access
Thoracoscopic enucleation of a large esophageal leiomyoma using a three thoracic ports technique
World Journal of Surgical Oncologyvolume 4, Article number: 70 (2006)
Video assisted thoracoscopic resection of an esophageal leiomyoma offers distinct advantages over an open approach. Many papers have described various techniques of thoracoscopic resection.
We describe a 32-year old man who presented with intermittent dysphagia. Imaging studies showed a large esophageal leiomyoma. He underwent thoracoscopic enucleation using a three thoracic-ports technique.
Thoracoscopic enucleation can be technically performed using a three thoracic-ports technique.
Leiomyoma is the most common benign esophageal tumor (70%–80%), occurring more often in the lower than the upper part. Many authors have described the use of videothoracoscopic surgery to performed enucleation of an esophageal leiomyoma with various techniques [1–3]. Everitt et al  was the first to report the thoracoscopic approach using seven thoracic ports. More recently, others have reported using the thoracoscopic approach with four thoracoscopic trocars or a small thoracotomy (Table 1). Herein, we report a patient with large esophageal leiomyoma, which was removed thoracoscopically, using a three thoracoscopic trocars technique.
A 32-year-old man presented with a 6-month history of intermittent dysphagia. Barium swallow showed an extrinsic compression of the lower thoracic esophagus. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, which revealed a large submucosal mass in the lower thoracic esophagus without mucosal irregularity. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax showed a large homogeneous tumor in the esophageal muscular layer, measuring about 5 × 6 cm, without paraesophageal lymph nodes and projecting into the right pleural cavity (Figure 1). Routine laboratory and clinical findings were normal.
The patient was intubated with a double lumen tube for one-lung ventilation and was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position. Three thoracic trocars were introduced (Figure 2). The camera port (10-mm) was placed at the ninth intercostal space, mid-axillary line. Two 5-mm trocars were introduced at the fifth intercostal space, anterior axillary line and the seventh intercostal space, posterior axillary line for using a "grasper" or coagulating device. The left lung was retracted to expose the lower thoracic esophagus. A simple hook was used to divide the mediastinal pleura overlying the esophagus. The lesion was then enucleated by careful dissection.
Intraoperative endoscopy with air insufflation was performed to confirm esophageal integrity (Figure 3). The esophageal muscle was re-approximated with interrupted 3/0 Dexon. The specimen was removed within an endobag through the camera port. A 28 Fr chest tube was inserted through the camera port for postoperative drainage. The operative time was 2 hours and intraoperative blood loss was minimal.
Barium swallow at day 3 after surgery revealed no leakage and the patient was started on a liquid diet on day 4. The pathological report showed a leiomyoma with mitotic figure 0–1 per10 high power fields (HPF). Immunoperoxidase stainings were positive for smooth mucle actin, and negative for S-100, CD34 and C-kit. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6. The patient is currently asymptomatic three months after surgery.
Esophageal leiomyoma is an uncommon benign tumor of smooth muscle origin. The most common anatomical location is in the lower third of the esophagus . Malignant degeneration is rare, but removal is often required on symptomatic grounds. The characteristics of the lesion are clearly seen using esophagoscopy and conventional imaging techniques (barium swallow, CT scan, EUS) without the need for preoperative endoscopic biopsy . Thoracoscopic enucleation is less invasive than open surgery, avoiding scaring and the discomfort of thoracotomy.
A thoracoscopic approach offers potential advantages compared with traditional thoracotomy, including minimal aesthetic disability, less pain, and better postoperative respiratory function. The limited operative trauma should allow a reduced postoperative hospital stay and more rapid resumption of normal activity .
The leiomyoma enucleation was easily performed and the esophageal muscular layer was carefully closed because of the reported development of a pseudodiverticulum after the procedure [6–8]. Intraoperative endoscopy with air insufflation confirmed an intact mucosal layer without any degree of esophageal stricture after suturing.
Some authors state that intraoperative endoscopy is not necessary to detect any perforation, because they infused blue dye proximally to the tumor after distal compression to create a bulge in the mucosa . However, intraoperative endoscopy can reveal an electrical injury to mucosa which cause delayed perforation.
The advantages of thoracoscopic removal of esophageal leiomyoma are confirmed in the limited series that have been published in recent years. Of particular significance is the relative simplicity of this kind of approach compared with traditional thoracotomy . Even with previous reports using four thoracic ports, the technique is applicable with three ports without any special instruments. This technique can be performed without morbidity and mortality, as in the recent study described.
Thoracoscopic enucleation is treatment of choice of esophageal leiomyoma. Even with previous reports using four thoracic ports, the technique is replicable with only three ports.
Roviaro GC, Maciocco M, Varoli F, Rebuffat C, Vergani C, Scarduelli A: Videothoracoscopic treatment of oesophageal leiomyoma. Thorax. 1998, 53: 190-192.
Nguyen NT, Alcocer JJ, Luketich JD: Thoracoscopic enucleation of an esophageal leiomyoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000, 31: 89-90. 10.1097/00004836-200007000-00023.
Izumi Y, Inoue H, Endo M: Combined endoluminal-intracavitary thoracoscopic enucleation of leiomyoma of the esophagus. A new method. Surg Endosc. 1996, 10: 457-458. 10.1007/s004649910091.
Everitt NJ, Glinatsis M, McMahon MJ: Thoracoscopic enucleation of leiomyoma of the esophagus. Br J Surg. 1992, 79: 643.
Seremetis MG, Lyons WS, DeGuzman VC, Peabody JW: Leiomyomata of the esophagus. Cancer. 1976, 38: 2166-2177. 10.1002/1097-0142(197611)38:5<2166::AID-CNCR2820380547>3.0.CO;2-B.
Bardini R, Segalin A, Asolati M, Bonavina L, Pavanello M: Thoracoscopic removal of benign tumors of the oesophagus. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993, 1: 277-279.
Bryan AJ, Buchanan JA, Wells FC: Saccular oesphageal diverticulum at the site of enucleation of a leiomyoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990, 4: 624-625. 10.1016/1010-7940(90)90023-S.
Bardini R, Asolati M: Thoracoscopic resection of benign tumours of the esophagus. Int Surg. 1997, 82: 5-6.
Coral RP, Madke G, Westphalen A, Tressino D, Carvalho LA, Mastalir E: Thoracoscopic enucleation of a leiomyoma of the upper thoracic esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2003, 16: 339-341. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2003.00323.x.
Izumi Y, Inoue H, Takeshita K, Kawano T, Yoshino K, Endo M: Thoracoscopic enucleation of leiomyoma of the esophagus: report of two cases. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995, 43: 216-220.
Schmid RA, Schob OM, Klotz HP, Vogt P, Weder W: VATS resection of an oesophageal leiomyoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis Recklinghausen. Eur J Cadriothorac Surg. 1997, 12: 659-662. 10.1016/S1010-7940(97)00210-8.
Infante M, Alloisio M, Massone PB, Ravasi G: Thoracoscopic resection of an esophageal stromal tumor through the left pleural cavity. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001, 11: 273-276. 10.1097/00129689-200108000-00009.
Von Rahden BH, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR: Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus: minimal invasive versus open approach. Surg Endosc. 2004, 18: 924-930. 10.1007/s00464-003-9130-9.
Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
We would like to thank Dr. Narong Lert-akayamanee and the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, for all their help in the preparation of this manuscript.
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
TA is the primary surgeon in charge who prepared the manuscript, VC is the second surgeon in charge who helped in the preparation of manuscript and edited it for its scientific content. TA, JS are the surgical staff who helped in the preparation of the figures for this manuscript. VL edited the manuscript for its scientific content.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.