- Open Access
The versatility of the free osteocutaneous fibula flap in the reconstruction of extremities after sarcoma resection
© Bach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 12 February 2004
- Accepted: 01 July 2004
- Published: 01 July 2004
An understanding of the biology of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, knowledge of adjuvant therapies and refinement in techniques of reconstructive surgery have allowed limb-sparing and limb salvage surgery to become a reality in the management of malignant tumors of the extremities. Functional limb salvage following radical resection has become a possibility in many resectable tumors by the use of alloplastic prostheses, homograft or autogenous bone for skeletal reconstitution combined with vascularized soft tissue coverage. Although the free fibula flap has been well described for reconstructions of the mandible and oral cavity, it has not been widely presented as an ideal tool to preserve extremities and to circumvent amputation.
Patients and methods
We describe the complex surgical reconstruction in four patients with primary sarcomas of the extremities. The sarcomas (Ewing's sarcoma, osteosarcoma and epitheloid sarcoma) were resected radically and the massive bone and soft tissue defect was replaced by vascularized free fibula transfer.
We present our experience with versatility of this osteocutaneous flap to allow reconstruction and salvage of extremitity sarcomas. There were no operative or postoperative complication and all the four patients had good limb function. The flap was found to be versatile as it could be used for either upper limb or lower limb and for large defects. The results were better in upper limb than in lower limb.
Free fibular graft was found to be effective for salvaging limb function where a massive bone defect resulted from wide tumor resection in the extremities.
- Ewing's sarcoma
- epitheloid sarcoma
- free fibula flap
- microvascular bone transfer
Common malignant tumors of the musculoskeletal system in children and young adults include Ewing's sarcoma and the osteosarcoma, osteosarcoma being the most frequent malignant neoplasm followed by Ewing's sarcoma. The osteosarcoma generally involves the metaphysis of long tubular bones especially the distal femur or proximal tibia, whereas Ewing's sarcoma occurs with almost equal frequency in flat bones and diaphyses of tubular bones and may occasionally arise in soft tissues [1–3]. Epitheloid sarcoma is rare. It occurs nearly three times more often in males compared to females, with the peak incidence between 20 and 29 years of age. Finger, hand, wrist and forearm are preferably affected in this type of malignant tumor [4, 5].
Early recognition and surgical treatment seem to offer the best chance for long term survival for these patients [2–6]. Limb-sparing resection in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant irradiation and/or chemotherapy is nowadays recommended as the treatment of choice in resectable soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the extremities [7, 8]. By this approach survival rates comparable to those after amputation and a better quality of life can be achieved . Important prerequisites to be considered in limb salvage surgery are local tumor control with disease free surgical margins (R0-Resection) and coverage of the surgical defect with vascularized tissue [8–10]. Without complex reconstruction using free flaps, radical resection may not be compatible with limb conservation. Moreover microvascular reconstruction has advantage of wound closure with vascularized tissue in one stage and the use of a distant donor site does not alter the function of an already compromised limb [7, 9, 11].
In the reconstruction of extensive long bone defects especially in combination with soft tissue loss, vascularized bone transfer is preferable, especially when the treatment protocol includes adjuvant irradiation and chemotherapy. For the reconstruction of larger bony defects, revascularized iliac crest or fibula are the first choice. The fibula has certain advantages compared to the crest; It is a straight cortical bone, its length is almost always sufficient to reconstruct large defects, and soft tissue reconstruction is possible by including a skin island [12–14]. Fibula transfer has been used extensively to bridge defects in the long bones of both the upper and lower limbs.
We demonstrate the versatility of the free osteocutaneous fibula flap in the reconstruction of extremities following sarcoma resection, presenting reconstructive procedures of all long bones of the extremities.
We describe here our initial experience with the treatment of bone tumors occurring in the extremities, which were treated after resection with a vascularized osteocutaneous fibular graft in four patients. All patients suffered from malignant tumors (Ewing-sarcoma, osteosarcoma and epitheloid sarcoma). The age of the patients at the time of surgery ranged from 13 to 34 years. The follow-up periods after bone transplantation ranged from 9 to 17 month. The affected bone sites were tibia, femur, humerus and the radius. After clinical examination imaging studies were carried out to assess tumor mass, soft tissue involvement and infiltration of adjacent tissues. Conventional X-rays, soft tissue magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomographic (CT) scan and angiography of the recipient site as well as of the lower leg fibular donor site were conducted. Radical tumor resection including all compartmental structures was performed after histological verification of the malignancy. Temporary intermittent wound closure was achieved by intraoperative application of continuous vacuum sealing (VAC). After complete resection of the tumor (R0) within the afflicted compartments, the reconstruction was subsequently done in a second step.
Operative technique and technique of free fibular transfer
Stage I – Debridement
A preoperative angiogram was carried out to assess the anatomical variation of the vessels at the donor and recipient site. The recipient vessels may be displaced by previous surgery and scar formation and must be preserved during radical resection of the tumor. The scar tissue was debrided and vessels dissected free.
Stage II – Fibula osteocutaneous flap harvesting and transplantation
A tourniquet was applied to the leg while harvesting the fibula. Whenever possible, the graft was harvested by incorporating the superficial skin flap to provide soft tissue coverage and to allow postoperative monitoring of the microvascular flap. However, skin paddles wider than 8 cm usually required skin grafting of the donor site. An elliptical skin paddle, with its central axis along the posterior border of the fibular head and beginning 10 cm below the fibular head, was incised and harvested subfascially up to the septum between the soleus and peroneus muscles. The skin perforators were identified. All skin perforators were dissected up to their origin and all muscle branches were clipped or ligated. The plane of dissection was between the peroneus longus and soleus and 2 – 3 mm of muscle sleeve around the fibula was included to incorporate the peroneal vascular pedicle. The interosseus membrane was divided and proximal and distal osteotomies were performed. The vascular pedicle was finally separated from the posterior tibial muscle and dissected up to the level of the posterior tibial artery. After these procedures were completed, the blood supply of the flap was solely from its vascular pedicle. The tourniquet was then released and the pedicle was ligated and separated when the recipient site was ready. Bony fixation was then achieved according to the situation of the recipient bones by impelling the end of the fibula into the medullary cavity of the recipient bone, if possible additional screw fixation were performed following microsurgical vessel anastomosis. Postoperative monitoring was easily performed by inspecting the microcirculation of the skin paddle.
Case – 1
Case – 2
Case – 3
Case – 4
The mainstay of the curative treatment of nearly every primary tumor of the musculoskeletal system is adequate surgical resection, as a good local control of primary seems to offer the best chance for long time survival in these patient [5, 15]. Besides, early functional rehabilitation depends on sufficient primary surgery [2, 3, 8, 10]. Radiation and chemotherapy are important adjuvant in the overall management of these tumors. The integration of reconstructive procedures into the oncological treatment is mandatory for soft tissue defects with exposure of bones, joints, tendons and neurovascular bundles [10, 16]. Combined orthopedic and plastic surgical management is essential both, at operation and rehabilitation. Adequate surgery represents early radical resection of the primary tumor while maintaining the highest possible level of quality of life. Therefore limb-sparing resection of sarcomas and immediate bony and soft-tissue reconstruction plays a key role in the multidisciplinary treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities [9, 10, 17, 18]. Several reconstructive procedures for bone defects following wide tumor resection in the extremities have been attempted. There are nonvascularized cancellous and cortical autografts, allografts, bone transport procedures and prosthetic replacements [16, 19–24]. Conventional cancellous graft reconstructions are suitable for situations with limited bone defects which are surrounded by adequate soft tissue coverage. The disadvantage of the procedure is the time required to obtain revascularization between the bone graft and the recipient site, moreover stress fractures and nonunion of the bone segments often occurs . Cadaveric bone allografts have been employed in recent years for limb reconstruction [6, 21]. However the healing mechanism of bone allografts is characterized by limited revascularization and in most cases restricted within a few millimeters of the bone surface. Reconstruction procedures by bone transport, like the Ilizarov technique include the disadvantage that it takes a long time (month to years) to compensate long bone defects which usually arise after adequate tumor resection. Moreover it has been described that this method comprises a high complication rate in patients with bone sarcomas . All these techniques are further compromised by the frequently necessary irradiation. Another option for reconstructing a long bone defect is free vascularized bone transfer [18, 26–32]. The healing mechanisms of a vascularized bone autograft are distinctly different from the other procedures. Revascularization occurs as a surgical event immediately upon restoration of physiologic blood flow at the completion of the vascular anastomosis. This circumstance retains osteoblastic and osteoclastic potential for primary bone healing as a simple fracture and to enhance early bone remodelling, which leads to a faster incorporation of the graft . The free fibula flap is now a well-recognized source of vascularized bone [33–35] and has important advantages over other donor sites. The fibula is a long and straight tubular bone which is not difficult to harvest, the anatomy is predictable and its size and shape allow intramedullary dowelling of femoral, tibial and humeral defects . Donor site morbidity is minimal up to a graft length of 20 cm. Vascularized free fibular grafting has been used successfully to treat bone defects associated with trauma, osteomyelitis and bone-non-union [13, 20, 21]. In the four presented patients after resection of malignant sarcomas of the extremities, the free osteocutaneous fibular graft produced a rapid bone union and adequate soft tissue coverage. Although bone transfers to the lower extremity showed significantly more hypertrophy than those in the upper extremity [30, 31], the small diameter of the fibula limits its capacity to bear certain weight. Though sufficient hypertrophy of the grafted fibula can often be expected in the case of children, in adults this bone graft seems to be more suitable for reconstruction of the upper extremities . In our cases bone union of the recipient bone with the fibular graft was observed within 5 month. Moreover the method of using an osteocutaneous free fibula flap with a composite skin flap is effective for vascular monitoring as well as closing the resulting skin and soft tissue defect which frequently results from tumor resection. Although the follow-up period has been relatively short, there has been no local recurrence or distant metastasis in any of the presented patients.
The compound free microvascular fibular flap seems to be suitable to minimize the number of surgical procedures and to maintain as much functional capability as possible for the patient. Moreover our results illustrate the versatility of this osteocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of extremities after sarcoma resection since most long bones of the extremities could be bridged. We emphasize that the vascularized fibula graft should be considered a reconstructive option for salvaging limb function where a massive bone defect results from wide resection of malignant tumor in the extremities as it may leads to an improvement of the quality of life for the patients.
Patient's permission was obtained for publication of their case details.
- Vlasak R, Sim FH: Ewing's sarcoma. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996, 27: 591-603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yaw KM: Pediatric bone tumors. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999, 16: 173-183. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199903)16:2<173::AID-SSU8>3.3.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arndt CAS, Crist WM: Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. New Eng J Med. 1999, 341: 342-352. 10.1056/NEJM199907293410507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roitzsch E, Irmscher J: Epithelial sarcoma. Three case reports with a review of literature. Zentralblatt für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie. 1976, 120: 417-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nigst H: Soft tissue tumors of the hand. Orthopade. 1988, 17: 209-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bach AD, Walgenbach KJ, Horch RE: Hemangiosarcoma of the left hand in a patient with the rare combination of Maffucci's an Stewart Treves syndrome. Vasa. 2000, 29: 71-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terek RM: Tumors of the elbow and forearm. Hand Clin. 1994, 10: 543-551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drake DB: Reconstruction for limb-sparing procedures in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Clin Plast Surg. 1995, 22: 123-128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal HG, Terek RM, Lane JM: Management of extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Clin Orthop. 1993, 289: 66-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinau HU, Büttemeyer R, Vogt P, Hussmann J, Hebebrand D: Limb salvage and reconstructive procedures in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Recent results Cancer Res. 1995, 138: 31-39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horch RE, Stark GB: The rectus abdominis free flap as an emergency procedure in extensive upper extremity soft tissue defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999, 103: 1421-1428.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrison DH: The osteocutaneous free fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986, 68: 804-810.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newington DP, Sykes PJ: The versatility of the free fibula flap in the management of traumatic long bone defects. Injury. 1991, 22: 275-281. 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90005-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minami A, Kutsumi K, Takeda N, Kaneda K: Vascularized fibular graft for bone reconstruction of the extremities after tumor resection in limb-saving procedures. Microsurgery. 1995, 16: 56-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aboulafia AJ, Malawer MM: Surgical management of pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1993, 71: 3358-3366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choong PF, Sim FH: Limb-sparing surgery for bone tumors: new developments. Semin Surg Oncol. 1997, 13: 64-69. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199701/02)13:1<64::AID-SSU10>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nichter LS, Menendez LR: Reconstructive considerations for limb salvage surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993, 24: 511-521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wexler AM, Eilber FR, Miller TA: Therapeutic and functional results of limb salvage to treat sarcomas of the forearm and the hand. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1988, 13: 292-296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aberg M, Rydholm A, Holmberg J, Wieslander JB: Reconstruction with a free vascularized fibular graft for malignant bone tumor. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988, 59: 430-437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mankin HJ, Doppelt SH, Sullivan TR, Tomford WW: Osteoarticular and intercalary allograft transplantation in the management of malignant tumors of bone. Cancer. 1982, 50: 613-630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford W: The use of frozen cadaveric allografts in the management of patients with bone tumors of the extremities. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987, 18: 275-289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Malawer MM: The effects of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer. 1981, 47: 1005-1012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guggenheim JJ: The Ilizarov method. Orthopedic and soft tissue applications. Clinics Plast Surg. 1998, 25: 567-578.Google Scholar
- Enneking WF, Morris JL: Human autologous cortical bone transplants. Clin Orthop. 1972, 87: 28-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozaki T, Nakatsuka Y, Kunisada T, Kawai A, Danura T, Naito N, Inoue H: High complication rate of reconstruction using Ilizarov bone transport method in patients with bone sarcomas. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998, 118: 136-139. 10.1007/s004020050333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gidumal R, Wood MB, Sim FH, Shives TF: Vascularized boned transfer for limb salvage and reconstruction after resection of aggressive bone tumor. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1987, 3: 183-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minami A, Ogino T, Sakuma T, Itoga H, Usui M: Free vascularized fibular graft for the treatment of a congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Microsurgery. 1987, 8: 111-116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W: Reconstruction of tibia by ipsilateral vascularized fibula and allograft. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997, 68: 298-301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Twisk R, Pavlov PW, Sonneveld J: Reconstruction of bone and soft tissue defects with free fibula transfer. Ann Plast Surg. 1988, 21: 555-558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- El Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM: Hypertrophy after free vascularized fibular transfer to the lower limb. Microsurgery. 2002, 22: 367-370. 10.1002/micr.10066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tu YK, Yen CY, Yeh WL, Wang IC, Wang KC, Ueng WN: Reconstruction of posttraumatic long bone defect with free vascularized bone graft: good outcome in 48 patients with 6 year's follow up. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001, 72: 359-364. 10.1080/000164701753542014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ceruso M, Falcone C, Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Capanna R, Manfrini M: Skeletal reconstruction with free vascularized fibula graft associated to bone allograft after resection of malignant bone tumor of limbs. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2001, 33: 277-282. 10.1055/s-2001-16597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan I, Ada S, Ozerkan F, Bora A, Ademoglu Y: Reconstruction of soft tissue and bone defects in lower extremity with free flaps. Microsurgery. 1998, 18: 176-181. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1998)18:3<176::AID-MICR10>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hidalgo DA, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, HU QY: A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998, 102: 722-732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert A: Vascularised transfer of the fibular shaft. Int J Microsurg. 1979, 1: 100-106.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.