Open Access

Mammotome-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery: a novel technique for early-stage breast cancer

World Journal of Surgical Oncology201412:99

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-99

Received: 25 March 2013

Accepted: 4 April 2014

Published: 18 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Because of its minimally invasive and highly accurate nature, the use of Mammotome, a vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device has proven beneficial to the treatment of benign breast lesions. Taking advantage of endoscopic and Mammotome techniques together, we utilized the Mammotome device for therapeutic excision of malignant lesions in breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods

Between December 2009 and January 2010, two patients with early breast cancer received Mammotome-assisted endoscopic BCSs. Under ultrasound monitoring, the Mammotome system dissected the surrounding tissue and freed the tumor en bloc leaving negative margins; endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection then followed.

Results

The operation time was less than 180 minutes and the mean blood loss was 60 ml. The post-operative pathology report confirmed two patients to have invasive ductal carcinoma, one without axillary lymph nodes metastasis (0/11) and the other with one lymph node metastasis (1/21). No adverse events were noted. During a mean follow-up of 26.5 months, no evidence of recurrence or metastasis was found. The patients were satisfied with the cosmetic results.

Conclusions

Mammotome-assisted endoscopic surgery appears to be a valuable option for early breast cancer. The long-term therapeutic effect remains to be confirmed.

Keywords

Mammotome Endoscopic surgery Early-stage breast cancer

Background

One of the current standards of approach for early-stage breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery (BCS)[1]. However, clinically, a minority of breast cancer patients with BCS are still dissatisfied with their cosmetic outcome[2, 3]. In order to avoid the obvious incision of the breast and obtain a better cosmetic outcome, endoscope-assisted surgery has been adapted in BCS, but the applications are restricted because of the long operation time involved and relatively large blood loss[4].

The most commonly used vacuum-assisted biopsy device, Mammotome (Ethicon Endo-surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA), has been successfully employed for excision of benign breast lesions such as fibroadenoma and intraductal papillomas due to its advantages of minimal invasiveness and more precise tissue harvesting[5, 6]. However, until now, there have been few reports on its application in resecting malignant breast tumors. In this study, we used a Mammotome-assisted endoscopic technique to excise the early breast cancer, improve the accuracy and completeness of excision and acquire a better appearance in two patients.

Methods

Between December 2009 and January 2010, two patients underwent Mammotome-assisted endoscopic excision technique of a preoperatively diagnosed invasive breast cancer at our hospital. Table 1 summarizes their characteristics. The two patients were women. On examination, one patient’s tumor was localized in the upper-outer quadrant of the left breast near the axilla (2.1 cm maximum diameter) and one enlarged lymph node which might have been involved was located in the ipsilateral axilla by ultrasonography (clinical stage: T2,N1,M0). The other patient’s tumor was 3.0 cm in maximum diameter and localized in the upper-inner quadrant of the left breast by preoperative ultrasonography (clinical stage: T2,N0,M0). Both patients’ hormone receptor status was estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) positive and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative. After four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the DE regimen (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and epirubicin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, every 2 weeks), ultrasound examinations showed that the tumors were reduced to 0.90 cm and 0.96 cm respectively in the maximum diameter and partial remission was achieved according to tumor response criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST)[7]. All patients underwent Mammotome-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery. The surgical procedures are described below.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the two patients before surgery

Patient number

Age/sex

Tumor size (cm)

TNM

Hormone status

HER-2

NACT regimen

Tumor size (cm) after NACT

1

57/F

2.1

T2N1M0

+

-

Docetaxel + epirubicin

0.9

2

41/F

3.0

T2N0M0

+

-

Docetaxel + epirubicin

0.96

NACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Surgical procedures

The patient was placed in the supine position, with the arm abducted to 90° after the induction of general anesthesia. The cutting edges were marked at a distance of 5 mm from the tumor, and at the lower exterior margin of the breast, the intersection points of the nipple level line and anterior border of the latissimus dorsi muscle were marked as the puncture sites for the Mammotome (Figure 1A). The lipolysis solution (250 ml of saline, 250 ml of distilled water, 1 mg epinephrine and 400 mg lidocaine) was injected into the subcutaneous space above the lesion, retromammary spaces and axillary fossa. A 5-mm incision was made in the skin at nipple level Mammotome puncture site and then an 8G probe was inserted into the posterior of the tumor via the retromammary spaces under ultrasonic guidance. The probe aperture was turned facing up towards the tumor and after rotation of the probe, the first 12 biopsies were taken and the deep, superior, inferior and superficial margins of the tumor were removed. Then, another 5-mm incision was made at the lower exterior margin of breast as the second puncture site, the Mammotome probe was inserted into tumor area, a further seven biopsies were taken and the medial and lateral margins of the tumor were resected (Figure 1B). All of the tissue margins were shown to be negative by intra-operative frozen section analysis (FSA). Sufficient liposuction was performed in the axillary, subcutaneous and retromammary spaces of the breast via the two Mammotome puncture sites using a metal aspiration tube with a side aperture (a suction tip used for uterine curettage); (Figure 1C). Another 5-mm incision was made at the upper exterior margin of the breast areola, with two Mammotome puncture sites as trocar sites. CO2 pressure was infused into the axilla to approximately 8 mmHg and then a 30-degree 10-mm endoscope was inserted into the subcutaneous space through the trocar sleeve. The trocar sleeve was placed in the lower exterior margin incision of breast, and the operating instruments were inserted into the other two trocars (Figure 1D). Under endoscopy, we found the tumor had been almost dissected (Figure 1E). Fibrous tissues connected with the tumor were removed and then levels I and II axillary lymph nodes were dissected endoscopically. The endoscopic dissection method of axillary lymph nodes was described previously[8]. The dissected tumor and axillary specimen (Figure 1F) were extracted through the axillary incision. A suction drainage tube was inserted into the axillary space through the inferior trocar hole.
Figure 1

The detailed process of the Mammotome-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery for case 1. (A) The edges of the tumor to be cut and the axillary border were marked. (B) The tissues in inferior margin of tumor were removed. (C) The fat was aspirated. (D) Endoscope and operating instruments were inserted into the subcutaneous space. (E) Tumor’s endoscopic image. (F) Resected specimens.

The anesthesia and positioning of patient 2 was same as patient 1. The cutting edges were marked at a distance of 5 mm from the tumor. The intersection points of the cutting edges extension line with the upper margin of areola and the upper exterior margin of the breast were marked as skin puncture sites of the Mammotome (Figure 2A). After injecting lipolysis solution, normal tissues on the marked cutting edges around the tumor were excised by the Mammotome device under ultrasound guidance. The resected tissue was obtained for intra-operative FSA and was shown to have negative margins. A 3-cm peri-areolar incision was made, and the subcutaneous space from the incision to the cavity around the tumor was freed. The small amount of mammary gland tissue remaining connected around the lesion was removed. The tumor was dissected and removed via the incision (Figure 2B, and C). A 10-mm incision was made in the lower exterior margin of breast, and another 5-mm incision was made at the intersection point of anterior border of the latissimus dorsi muscle and the nipple level line. Lipolysis and liposuction of the axillary fossa and endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection were performed as mentioned above.
Figure 2

The Mammotome-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery used for case 2. (A) Cutting edges of tumor and axilla were marked. (B) Dissected tumor and the surrounding normal tissues. (C) Ultrasound assessment for the Mammotome procedure and schematic representation of Mammotome excision.

Results

The operation time and the blood loss of each patient is shown in Table 2. The pathology report was that the margins (medial, lateral, superior, inferior, superficial, and deep) of each breast mass were uninvolved with tumor. Two cycles of chemotherapy with DE regimen were administered post-operatively. Post-operative radiation therapy was administered, followed by endocrine therapy. The post-operative pathology report confirmed the two patients as having invasive ductal carcinoma, but no metastases were demonstrated in the dissected axillary lymph nodes (0/11) of one, and one lymph node metastasis (1/21) was demonstrated in the other.
Table 2

Clinical outcomes for patients after surgery

Patient number

Operation time (minutes)

Lymph node status

Blood loss (ml)

Drainage time (days)

Drainage volume (ml)

Chemotherapy regimen

Radiation therapy

Follow-up (months)

Complications

1

175

0/11

70

10

387

Docetaxel + epirubicin

Yes

27

None

2

150

1/21

50

7

227

Docetaxel + epirubicin

Yes

26

None

The patients received follow-up evaluation every six months. They remained well and disease-free for over 26 months after the operation. No evidence of recurrence or metastasis was found. No adverse events associated with endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection had been observed at the time of writing. Furthermore, two patients were very satisfied with the cosmetic results (Figure 3A and B for patients 1 and 2, respectively).
Figure 3

Pre- and post-operative images of case 1 and case 2. (A) Case 1, 18 months after surgery. (B) Case 2, 12 months after surgery.

Discussion

Endoscopic surgery has been used in the treatment of breast cancer for over a decade[912]. As a minimally invasive technique, endoscopic surgery has prominent advantages over the traditional open approach. Many clinical trials have demonstrated that endoscope-assisted BCS is safe and feasible for early-stage breast cancer[13, 14]. Ultrasound-guided Mammotome biopsy is widely recognized as an accurate and valuable option for the diagnosis of breast lesions[15], and this procedure has recently been highly recommended and increasingly applied in the treatment of benign breast lesions[5, 6]. However, it has rarely been recommended for malignant breast tumor removal in accordance with the en bloc resection principle of malignant tumors.

Employing the advantages of the Mammotome, we expected that a vacuum-assisted biopsy system could be used to remove non-cancerous surrounding tissues before performing complete excision of a small size tumor rather than directly cutting the tumor into pieces. In our studies, we combined the Mammotome and endoscopic techniques in BCS and used the Mammotome system for therapeutic excision of malignant lesions. Under ultrasound guidance, the Mammotome system facilitated the removal of the cutting edges, approximately 4 mm in thickness, around the tumor, and each specimen was sent for intra-operative FSA. Using this technique, after the tumor had been almost completely separated, we could conserve the normal breast tissue adjacent to the tumor as much as possible. If the distance between tumor and nipple was < 3 cm, the residual breast tissues contiguous to the tumor could be excised through a peri-areolar incision to perform wide local excision surgery. If the tumor-nipple distance was > 3 cm, the tumor dissection could be performed via the endoscopic approach.

Endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection was performed with three trocars individually located at the lower exterior margin of the breast, the upper exterior margin of the areola, intersection points of the nipple level line and the anterior border of the latissimus dorsi muscle (some of these trocar sites could also serve as Mammotome puncture sites). The axillary specimens were extracted from the axillary incision, and the dissected tumor was extracted from the axillary or the peri-areolar incision.

A number of researchers have limited their clinic trials of endoscopic breast cancer surgery to T1 and small T2 tumors[12, 16]. Based on our practice, the size and location of the tumor and the tumor-nipple distance should be assessed carefully in Mammotome-assisted endoscopic BCS, because oncologic safety and the convenience of the operation should be given full consideration[17]. The maximum tumor diameter of both patients presented herein was reduced to <1 cm after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The cutting edges of the Mammotome were 5 mm away from the tumor, and all margin tissues were confirmed to be negative by intra-operative FSA. Theoretically, breast cancer patients with tumors <2 cm in size, located >2 cm from the areola and without invasion of the skin and pectoralis major muscle can safely undergo Mammotome-assisted endoscopic BSC.

An important purpose of this surgery is to obtain better cosmetic results. Small incisions were made in a distal and poorly-visible area with access the tumor, which was then removed with the Mammotome and endoscopic surgery technique. In the two patients described herein, we made another skin incision around the areola or in the axillary fossa through which to excise and remove the tumor, and no breast skin incision or obvious scar was detectable at the operation site. These two patients were very satisfied with the post-operative cosmetic results. No recurrence or metastasis had occurred in follow-up for a mean of 26.5 months.

Additionally, endoscopy-assisted techniques for the removal of malignant tumors have been described previously with better cosmetic outcome than the conventional BCS[14]. However, in open surgery or under an endoscope, without real-time ultrasonic guidance, it is difficult to achieve precise excision of tumor margin along the pre-drawn excision line. Moreover, the traction during operation may cause the actual cutting edges to deviate from the pre-drawn lines, which may lead to insufficient dissection or over-dissection. In Mammotome-assisted endoscopic BCS, the surgeon can accurately dissect the tumor margin and free the tumor under real-time ultrasonic guidance, thereby avoiding deviation from actual excision lines from the pre-drawn ones. Although in case 2, the length of the incision may not show significant advantage compared with minimally invasive open surgery, we believe that the length and location of the incisions can be further improved with the accumulation of our surgical experience.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first time that a combinative use of Mammotome and endoscopic surgery techniques to perform the en bloc resection of breast cancer has been reported. We advocate that Mammotome-assisted endoscopic BCS should be a safe and effective technique for minimally invasive tumor excision with a safety margin in early-stage breast cancer. Additionally, this novel surgical approach could also provide a significantly better cosmetic outcome than conventional lumpectomy for well selected patients. Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages to this technique which are as follow: patients with tumor >2 cm are not suitable for this method; the operation time is longer than that of open surgery; and the operation can only be successfully performed by a surgeon experienced in endoscopic and Mammotome techniques. Moreover, the long-term therapeutic effect still requires further confirmation with a large-sample clinical trial and long-term follow-up.

Abbreviations

BCS: 

breast-conserving surgery

ER: 

estrogen receptor

FSA: 

frozen section analysis

HER-2: 

epidermal growth factor receptor 2

NACT: 

neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PR: 

progesterone receptor

RECIST: 

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ling Zhong for helping with the images collection and Junlan Liu for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (No.cstc2013jcyjA10116 and 2011AB5041).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Breast Disease Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University

References

  1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1227-1232. 10.1056/NEJMoa020989.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW: Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast. 1999, 8: 162-168. 10.1054/brst.1999.0017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yang JD, Lee JW, Kim WW, Jung JH, Park HY: Oncoplastic surgical techniques for personalized breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patient with small to moderate sized breast. J Breast Cancer. 2011, 14: 253-261. 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.4.253.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Noguchi M: Roles of endoscopy-assisted approaches in surgical management of breast cancer: present state of the art and outlook for the future. Trends Cancer Res. 2006, 2: 85-92.Google Scholar
  5. Iwuagwu O, Drew P: Vacuum-assisted biopsy device-diagnostic and therapeutic applications in breast surgery. Breast. 2004, 13: 483-487. 10.1016/j.breast.2004.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Maxwell AJ: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision of breast papillomas: review of 6-years experience. Clin Radiol. 2009, 64: 801-806. 10.1016/j.crad.2009.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the united states, national cancer institute of Canada. J Nati Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 205-216. 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan LJ, Jiang J: Surgical technique of fully endoscopic modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Chin J Breast Dis (electronic version, in Chinese). 2010, 4: 17-26.Google Scholar
  9. Tamaki Y, Nakano Y, Sekimoto M, Sakita I, Tomita N, Ohue M, Komoike Y, Miyazaki M, Nakayama T, Kadota M, Monden M: Transaxillary endoscopic partial mastectomy for comparatively early-stage breast cancer. An early experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998, 8: 308-312. 10.1097/00019509-199808000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tamaki Y, Sakita I, Miyoshi Y, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Monden M, Noguchi S: Transareolar endoscopy-assisted partial mastectomy: a preliminary report of six cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001, 11: 356-362. 10.1097/00129689-200112000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Langer I, Kocher T, Guller U, Torhorst J, Oertli D, Harder F, Zuber M: Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection: a prospective analysis of 52 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005, 90: 85-91. 10.1007/s10549-004-3268-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Owaki T, Yoshinaka H, Ehi K, Kijima Y, Uenosono Y, Shirao K, Nakano S, Natsugoe S, Aikou T: Endoscopic quadrantectomy for breast cancer with sentinel lymph node navigation via a small axillary incision. Breast. 2005, 14: 57-60. 10.1016/j.breast.2004.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Leff DR, Vashisht R, Yongue G, Keshtgar M, Yang GZ, Darzi A: Endoscopic breast surgery: where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011, 125: 607-625. 10.1007/s10549-010-1258-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Park HS, Lee JS, Park S, Kim SI, Park BW: The feasibility of endoscopy-assisted breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2011, 14: 52-57. 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakano S, Sakamoto H, Ohtsuka M, Mibu A, Sakata H, Yamamoto M: Evaluation and indications of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsy. Breast Cancer. 2007, 14: 292-296. 10.2325/jbcs.14.292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan AC: Endoscopic-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate mammary prosthesis reconstruction for early breast cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002, 16: 302-306. 10.1007/s004640000203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzal F, Riedl O, Mittlbock M, Dubsky P, Bartsch R, Steger G, Jakesz R, Gnant M: Oncologic safety of breast-conserving surgery after tumour downsizing by neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective single centre cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011, 127: 121-128. 10.1007/s10549-010-1164-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement