Colonoscopy is the first choice for early postoperative rectal anastomotic bleeding
© Lou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 23 October 2014
Accepted: 20 November 2014
Published: 6 December 2014
Anastomotic bleeding is rare but is one of the dangerous complications, with associated morbidity and mortality, at the early stage of rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to report our experiences in the treatment of this emergency condition.
We retrospectively analyzed the general characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with severe anastomotic bleeding after undergoing rectal cancer resection with stapled anastomosis at the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Changhai Hospital (China) between January 2011 and December 2013.
Anastomotic bleeding occurred in six out of 2,181 patients (0.3%) who underwent anterior resection with stapled anastomosis due to rectal cancer. All patients’ bleeding was stopped with colonoscopic techniques. There were no anastomotic leakages or strictures in these six patients.
Anastomotic bleeding was a very rare complication after rectal cancer resection with stapled anastomosis. Colonoscopic treatment, including electrocoagulation and clipping, were both safely and effectively used in the early postoperative period to cease persistent anastomotic bleeding.
KeywordsAnastomotic bleeding Rectal cancer Colonoscopy Hemostasis
Anastomotic bleeding is one of the dangerous complications, with associated morbidity and mortality, at the early postoperative stage of rectal cancer surgery. Although uncommon, significant anastomotic bleeding after rectal resection can be severe enough to require re-operation. This emergency has been reported in recent years [1–3]. However, there are only a few clinical reports focused on the treatments of anastomotic bleeding because of the limited number of cases. The aim of the present study was to report our experiences of colonoscopic hemostasis of anastomotic bleeding at the early postoperative stage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
The ethical committee of Changhai hospital provided ethical approval for this study. Changhai Hospital (Shanghai, China) is a large tertiary hospital that includes medical practice, teaching and scientific research. About 1,500 colorectal cancer patients receive surgical treatment per year. In the present study we included patients from our department between January 2011 and December 2013 who had persistent bleeding of the rectum after rectal anastomosis within the first four postoperative weeks, and one or more of the following criteria as previous report : a significant fall in hemoglobin, need for blood transfusion, hemodynamic instability or shock and, finally, the need for any emergency intervention such as colonoscopy or surgery. All patients received a standardized operation regimen and perioperative medicine according to the hospital protocol. Clinical data concerning demographics, risk factors of hemorrhage, location of the tumor (distance to the anal verge), type of procedure, protective ileostomy, time to postoperative bleeding, colonoscopic hemostatic techniques, complications and postoperative stay were collected retrospectively. A colonoscope (CV-260sl, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used to check for anastomotic bleeding. We used clips (HX-610-135 l, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a high frequency electric surgical operation system (VIO 200 S, ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tubingen, Germany) for hemostasis.
Strategies of colonoscopic hemostasis
Bowel preparations were not required before the colonoscopic hemostasis. Blood and clots often masked the bleeding points, therefore, the first step is to fill the intestinal lumen with cold water to make it possible to identify the bleeding points. There were two different hemostatic strategies for different anastomotic bleeding types. If a colonoscopy revealed an active and continuous bleeding point from the artery, clipping would be adopted. If bleeding was caused by mucosal staxis, electrocoagulation would be adopted.
Results and discussion
Characteristics, treatments and results of seven patients
Type of procedure
Time to postoperative bleeding
Hemoglobin drop (g/dl)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
Blood transfusion (units)
Colonoscopic hemostatic techniques
Postoperative stay (days)
24 hours (First time)
4th day (Second time)
Continuous rectal anastomotic bleeding is rare. However when it occurs, it may need further intervention. In this study, we reported our experiences of successful colonoscopic hemostasis for rectal anastomotic bleeding at the early postoperative stage. All patients avoided more invasive operations for hemostasis and no colonoscopic complications occurred.
The incidence of postoperative colorectal anastomotic bleeding varies from 0.4 to 4% [5, 6]. In our study, the incidence of stapled anastomotic bleeding was 0.3%, lower than that reported in previous reports. Staple line reinforcement has been postulated to reduce associated bleeding risk . Our lower incidence may be attributed to the technique of whole layer interrupted reinforcement sutures after stapled anastomosis.
There are some special characteristics in anastomotic bleeding after stapled rectal anastomosis, such as repeated defecation with blood or blood clots and rectal irritation symptoms. Anastomotic bleeding is usually treated successfully by drugs alone. However, more invasive methods such as colonoscopy or even reoperation are occasionally necessary as anastomotic bleeding can be severe enough to cause hemorrhagic shock. This kind of emergency commonly occurs in the early postoperative period. The time interval to postoperative hemorrhage from a stapled colorectal anastomosis is reported to range from four hours to nine days . In the present study, anastomotic bleeding occurred between two hours and seven days. It is very important to carry out close postoperative monitoring in order to detect rectal anastomotic bleeding as early as possible.
Colonoscopy allows for a direct inspection of the anastomosis with subsequent application of various means of hemostasis. Furthermore, this method has several advantages. Firstly, colonoscopy exerts less physiological stress on patients compared with reoperation. Secondly, no anesthesia is necessary, although some patients may need to have a mild sedative. Thirdly, reoperation and associated complications are thereby avoided. Finally, it is cost-saving in both operative costs and overall length of hospital stay.
However, there are two limitations of this intervention. Firstly, colonoscopy may seem aggressive and possibly even dangerous to perform in the early postoperative period because of air insufflation, local colonoscope trauma and torque . Thus colonoscopic hemostasis needs to be performed by skilled and experienced doctors. Another limitation is the possibility of anastomotic disruption and subsequent leakage due to colonoscopic electrocoagulation at the early postoperative stage. Cirocco and Golub reported the successful use of electrocoagulation, although they noted that an anastomotic fistula that developed in one of their six cases might have been related to this technique . However, due to the small number of cases reported there is not sufficient statistical evidence to demonstrate an increased risk of anastomotic fistula with colonoscopic electrocoagulation. In the present study, we adopted colonoscopic electrocoagulation or clipping of the anastomotic bleeding, and none of our patients developed anastomotic fistula. It remains difficult to know if the beginning of this troublesome complication is the bleeding itself, its hemodynamic consequences or the treatment of the anastomosis .
Anastomotic site, surgical methods and protective colostomy have been reported to be associated with anastomotic bleeding . However, the role of many factors remains controversial. So far, the risk factors for anastomotic bleeding have not been fully elucidated, and anastomotic bleeding cannot be accurately predicted and prevented with precise and effective methods. Our results suggest that anastomotic bleeding appears more likely after anus-preserving operations for low rectal cancer. Some authors suggest adopting an intraoperative colonoscopy in order to routinely secure stapling colorectal anastomosis . However, it is usually impossible to adopt a routine colonoscopy procedure in this manner to check anastomosis perfection in many hospitals. We propose that intraoperative colonoscopy should be adopted for anastomotic bleeding only in those in whom bleeding is suspected during surgery.
Rectal anastomotic bleeding is a rare complication in the early postoperative stage. When it occurs, colonoscopy may be the first choice of hemostasis. Colonoscopic techniques, including electrocoagulation and clipping, are both a safe and effective way to control anastomotic bleeding.
This work was supported by the foundation of 1255 project (number: CH125542500), Changhai Hospital, Shanghai and the foundation from the guiding project (number: 134119a3800), Science and Technology Committee, Shanghai, Republic of China.
- Petronella P, Scorzelli M, Manganiello A, Nunziata L, Ferretti M, Campitiello F, Santoriello A, Freda F, Canonico S: Our experience of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010, 57: 482-486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Nagawa H: Intraoperative colonoscopy for stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Surg Today. 2008, 38: 1063-1065. 10.1007/s00595-007-3740-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, Takemura M, Fujiwara Y: Laparoscopic rectal surgery for middle and lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 145-151. 10.1007/s00464-009-0551-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Serrano MA, Parés D, Pera M, Pascual M, Courtier R, Egea MJ, Grande L: Management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding after colorectal resection and stapled anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2009, 13: 49-53. 10.1007/s10151-009-0458-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malik AH, East JE, Buchanan GN, Kennedy RH: Endoscopic haemostasis of staple-line haemorrhage following colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2008, 10: 616-618. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01459.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Linn TY, Moran BJ, Cecil TD: Staple line haemorrhage following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections may be more common when the inferior mesenteric artery is preserved. Tech Coloproctol. 2008, 12: 289-293. 10.1007/s10151-008-0437-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Downey DM, Ali S, Goldblatt MI, Saxe JM, Dolan JP: Gastrointestinal staple line reinforcement. Surg Technol Int. 2007, 16: 55-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez RO, Sousa A, Bresciani C, Proscurshim I, Coser R, Kiss D, Habr-Gama A: Endoscopic management of postoperative stapled colorectal anastomosis hemorrhage. Tech Coloproctol. 2007, 11: 64-66. 10.1007/s10151-007-0330-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amr MA, Alzghari MJ, Polites SF, Khasawneh MA, Morris DS, Baron TH, Zielinski MD: Endoscopy in the early postoperative setting after primary gastrointestinal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014, 18: 1911-1916. 10.1007/s11605-014-2625-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cirocco WC, Golub RW: Endoscopic treatment of postoperative hemorrhage from a stapled colorectal anastomosis. Am Surg. 1995, 61: 460-463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao WT, Hu FL, Li YY, Li HJ, Luo WM, Sun F: Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2013, 37: 227-232. 10.1007/s00268-012-1812-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.