Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Breast hemangioma with difficulty in preoperative diagnosis: a case report

  • Naotake Funamizu1Email author,
  • Isao Tabei1,
  • Chikako Sekine1,
  • Azusa Fuke1,
  • Mitsuo Yabe1,
  • Hiroshi Takeyama2 and
  • Tomoyoshi Okamoto1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201412:313

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-313

Received: 3 April 2014

Accepted: 3 October 2014

Published: 14 October 2014

Abstract

We report a rare case of breast hemangioma found in a 70-year-old Japanese female. Before seeking medical attention, the patient noticed a hard mass in her right breast but denied associated symptoms. A mammography revealed a well-circumscribed, highly dense, lobular nodule located in the middle inter portion of the right breast. To verify this finding, we used ultrasonography which revealed an irregular, iso-echoic nodule measuring 10 mm in the same portion. Based on these findings, we suspected a malignancy and performed a core needle biopsy. Unexpectedly, a histological examination of the biopsy displayed normal vasculature, adipose, and mammary tissues. In order to make an accurate diagnosis, the mass was surgically excised under general anesthesia and sent to pathology. Pathological findings of the mass were positive for breast hemangioma, and the patient has had no recurrence of the disease for the past 24 months.

Keywords

Breast hemangiomaBreast hemangiosarcoma

Background

Breast hemangioma is a rare, benign vascular tumor that accounts for only 0.4% of all breast tumors [1]. Preoperatively, hemangiomas of the breast are difficult to diagnose using conventional imaging modalities since they lack pathognomonic characteristics. We report the case of a 70-year-old Japanese female with a breast hemangioma.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old Japanese female consulted a local hospital upon noticing a hard mass in her right breast, and was later referred to our hospital for diagnosis and treatment. The patient denied a family history of breast cancer, while her physical examination revealed a firm, mobile mass measuring 10 mm. No axillary lymphadenopathy or nipple discharge was observed. A mammography (MMG) was performed in the standard craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique positions. The MMG demonstrated a well-circumscribed, highly dense, lobular mass in the middle inner portion of the right breast (Figure 1a). No associated calcifications were present.We followed up the MMG with an US which revealed a poorly demarcated, iso-echoic lesion of 10 mm without any accompanying posterior echo attenuation (Figure 1b). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a well-defined, enhanced mass at both the early and late phases (Figure 2a).Following variations in results, the patient underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). T1-weighted images of the tumor displayed high signal intensity, while the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated a heterogeneous enhancement in both the early and delayed phases (Figure 2b). Based on our MRI findings, a preoperative diagnosis of occult breast cancer was suspected. Since these findings were highly suggestive of a malignant tumor, an aspiration biopsy cytology (ABC) was performed. An ABC analysis showed a poor specimen composed only of blood. A sonography-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) was then performed and was positive for vascular, adipose and mammary tissues, but lacked evidence of a malignancy.As a result, a total excisional biopsy of the tumor in the inner portion of the right breast was performed under general anesthesia. The resected specimen (17 × 23 mm in size) was a firm, well-circumscribed mass with a brownish hue (Figure 3). A histological examination of the specimen revealed a breast hemangioma lacking cellular atypia (Figure 4). The postoperative course of the disease has remained recurrence-free for 25 months.
Figure 1

A mammography revealed a circumscribed, high-density lobular nodule. a. The nodule measured 1 cm in diameter and was located in the middle inter portion of her right breast. b. An ultrasonography (US) revealed a heterogeneous, iso-echoic mass with irregular margins measuring 10 × 12 mm in diameter. No accompanying posterior acoustical shadowing was observed.

Figure 2

Enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. a. Enhanced computed tomography showed a well-enhanced nodule in both the early and late phase. b. Dynamic T-1 weighted image revealed a highly intense nodule in the right breast (A). A subtraction image showed a hyper-intense nodule in early and late phases (B, C).

Figure 3

Macroscopic view of the surgical specimen.

Figure 4

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained section demonstrated that the tumor consisted of both dilated and congested vessels filled with numerous red blood cells.

Discussion

Breast hemangioma is a rare, benign vascular tumor representing only 0.4% of all breast tumors [1]. Histologically, breast hemangiomas are classified as either diffuse or localized. Localized hemangiomas are further divided into the following subtypes: peri-lobular, parenchymal, subcutaneous and venous. The parenchymal subtype is classified into capillary and cavernous hemangiomas [2]. Peri-lobular hemangiomas are relatively common lesions that are generally small and impalpable [3]. The other two types of hemangiomas are rare [2]. When making a diagnosis of breast hemangioma, it is important to include hemangiosarcoma, lipoma, cysts, mucinous carcinomas and fibroadenoma in the differential. It should also be noted that an accurate preoperative diagnosis of breast hemangioma seems difficult using current imaging modalities, as well as ABC and CNB.

When looking at summarized patient reports, only three out of 27 breast hemangiomas have been diagnosed preoperatively [426]. Furthermore, women comprised 23 of these patients while men accounted for only four (age range 17 to 82 years; mean age 55.6 years). Moreover, the majority of masses in these patients appeared on an MMG as oval, or high-density, lobular lesions with well-circumscribed edges. With sonographic studies, 63.0% of these patients showed well-circumscribed, hypoechoic masses. In addition, vascularity on color Doppler sonography has not been found to have diagnostic value. As previously described, radiographic assistance in reaching the diagnosis has been limited. Breast hemangioma specimens analyzed by CNB or ABC were found to contain hematic material in 40.7% of patients (Additional file 1: Table S1). Unfortunately, these findings are unreliable for making an accurate diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is confirmed, surgical resection is curative since most breast hemangiomas have low malignant potential [3, 27]. Pathologically, it is important to distinguish hemangiomas from hemangiosarcomas. Hemangiosarcomas have an extremely poor prognosis with a three-year survival rate of just 38%. Mesurolle et al. reported that CNB was a potential method of distinguishing hemangioma from hemangiosarcoma, even though 37% of hemangiosarcomas are incorrectly diagnosed as hemangiomas using CNB [28, 29]. The difficulty in making a clear distinction between the two is due to the varying degree of cellular atypia found in hemangiosarcomas [30], and supports the need to perform a total excisional biopsy if hemangioma is suspected.

Conclusions

When ABC or CNB of a suspected breast tumor exhibits only hematic material, it is necessary to consider a vascular tumor in the differential diagnosis. Likewise, it is essential to perform a total excisional biopsy if hemangioma of the breast is suspected.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of the case report and any accompanying images.

Abbreviations

ABC: 

aspiration biopsy cytology

CNB: 

core-needle biopsy

CT: 

computed tomography

MMG: 

mammography

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

US: 

ultrasonography

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Curtis R Lacy who participated in the discussion and English translation of this paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
(2)
Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Smythe FW: Brief communication: intramammary hemangioma. Ann Surg. 1942, 115: 716-719. 10.1097/00000658-194204000-00022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rosen PP, Jozefczyk MA, Boram LH: Vascular tumors of the breast. IV: the venous hemangioma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985, 9: 659-665. 10.1097/00000478-198509000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoda SA, Cranor ML, Rosen PP: Hemangiomas of the breast with atypical histological features: further analysis of histological subtypes confirming their benign character. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992, 16: 553-560. 10.1097/00000478-199206000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sebek BA: Cavernous hemangioma of the female breast. Cleve Clin Q. 1984, 51: 471-474. 10.3949/ccjm.51.2.471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Webb LA, Young JR: Case report: haemangioma of the breast–appearances on mammography and ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 1996, 51: 523-524. 10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80198-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Markopoulos C, Sampalis F, Gogas H, Despotidis P, Kyriakou V: Cavernous haemangioma of the breast. A case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998, 19: 246-248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vuorela AL: MRI of breast hemangioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998, 22: 1009-1010. 10.1097/00004728-199811000-00032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Galindo LM, Shienbaum AJ, Dwyer-Joyce L, Garcia FU: Atypical hemangioma of the breast: a diagnostic pitfall in breast fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001, 24: 215-218. 10.1002/1097-0339(200103)24:3<215::AID-DC1044>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Aurello P, Cicchini C, Mingazzini P: Hemangioma of the breast: an unusual lesion without univocal diagnostic findings. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 20: 611-613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Siewert B, Jacobs T, Baum JK: Sonographic evaluation of subcutaneous hemangioma of the breast. Am J Roentgenol. 2002, 178: 1025-1027. 10.2214/ajr.178.4.1781025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Mariscal A, Casas JD, Balliu E, Castellà E: Breast hemangioma mimicking carcinoma. Breast. 2002, 11: 357-358. 10.1054/brst.2002.0453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chung SY, Oh KK: Mammographic and sonographic findings of a breast subcutaneous hemangioma. J Ultrasound Med. 2002, 21: 585-588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mesurolle B, Wexler M, Halwani F, Aldis A, Veksler A, Kao E: Cavernous hemangioma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic findings and follow-up in a patient receiving hormone-replacement therapy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003, 31: 430-436. 10.1002/jcu.10193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayasaka K, Tanaka Y, Saitoh T, Takahashi M: Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI of breast hemangioma. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003, 27: 493-495. 10.1016/S0895-6111(03)00043-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinoshita S, Kyoda S, Tsuboi K, Son K, Usuba T, Nakasato Y, Kashiwagi H, Komine K, Takeishi M, Sato S, Takeyama H, Uchida K, Yamazaki Y, Sakamoto G: Huge cavernous hemangioma arising in a male breast. Breast Cancer. 2005, 12: 231-233. 10.2325/jbcs.12.231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim SJ, Han HS, Kim JS, Park JH, Jeon HJ, Yi JG: Cavernous hemangioma of the breast parenchyma with unusual features. J Ultrasound Med. 2006, 25: 1343-1346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Vourtsi A, Zervoudis S, Pafiti A, Athanasiadis S: Male breast hemangioma–a rare entity: a case report and review of the literature. Breast J. 2006, 12: 260-262. 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00251.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Adwani A, Bees N, Arnaout A, Lanaspre E: Hemangioma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasound features. Breast J. 2006, 12: 271-10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00255.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim DC, Song BJ: Subcutaneous venous hemangioma of the breast. J Ultrasound Med. 2007, 26: 1097-1100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalfior D, Eccher A, Menestrina F, Bonzanini M, Dvornik G: Epithelioid hemangioma of the thoracic wall mimicking breast tumor: a case report. Breast J. 2008, 14: 300-301. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00579.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leddy R, Cluver A: Mammographic and sonographic characteristics of a cavernous hemangioma in a male patient. J Ultrasound Med. 2010, 29: 645-649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawatra V, Lakshmikantha A, Dhingra KK, Gupta P, Khurana N: A rare coexistence of concurrent breast hemangioma with fibroadenoma: a case report. Cases J. 2009, 2: 7005-10.1186/1757-1626-2-7005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferreira SS, Barra RR, Gonçalves MC, Galvão CN, Santos GC, Alexandrino A, Vieira RA, da Rocha ET, Moriguchi SM: Breast hemangioma investigation–a rare condition documented by nuclear medicine, radiology and pathology. Breast J. 2011, 17: 305-307. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01083.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tilve A, Mallo R, Pérez A, Santiago P: Breast hemangiomas: correlation between imaging and pathologic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012, 40: 512-517. 10.1002/jcu.21904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ameen R, Mandalia U, Marr AA, McKensie P: Breast Hemangioma: MR Appearance with Histopathological Correlation. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012, 2: 53-10.4103/2156-7514.100376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tadakoshi M, Ishibashi H, Orimoto Y, Sugimoto I, Iwata H, Yamada T, Hida N, Ohta T: Huge hemangioma in the chest mimicking a breast tumor: report of a case. Ann Vasc Dis. 2012, 5: 222-224.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jozefczyk MA, Rosen PP: Vascular tumors of the breast. II: perilobular hemangiomas and hemangiomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985, 9: 491-503. 10.1097/00000478-198507000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mesurolle B, Sygal V, Lalonde L, Lisbona A, Dufresne MP, Gagnon JH, Kao E: Sonographic and mammographic appearances of breast hemangioma. Am J Roentgenol. 2008, 191: W17-W22. 10.2214/AJR.07.3153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen KT, Kirkegaard DD, Bocian JJ: Angiosarcoma of the breast. Cancer. 1980, 46: 368-371. 10.1002/1097-0142(19800715)46:2<368::AID-CNCR2820460226>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Kaufman RJ, Rosen PP: Angiosarcoma of the breast. Radiology. 1992, 183: 649-654. 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584913.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Funamizu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement