Open Access

Inflammation-based prognostic scores and nutritional prognostic index in patients with locally-advanced unresectable colorectal cancer

  • Masahide Ikeguchi1Email author,
  • Sho-ichi Urushibara1,
  • Ryugo Shimoda1,
  • Manabu Yamamoto1,
  • Yoshihiko Maeta1 and
  • Keigo Ashida1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201412:210

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-210

Received: 27 May 2014

Accepted: 4 July 2014

Published: 15 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Unresectable colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis. However, some patients survive intensive chemotherapy, and complete resection of primary and metastatic tumors may even be possible. In the present study, we examined the prognostic factors associated with survival after intensive chemotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 61 patients diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced colorectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2013. Among the prognostic parameters, we found that the prognoses of patients with abnormal performance status (PS) of 2 or 3, high Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) of 1 or 2, high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >5, and low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) <40 were poor. Thus, we scored each patient according to our scoring system (abnormal PS, 2 or 3 = +1; high GPS, 1 or 2 = +1; high NLR, >5 = +1; and low PNI, <40 = +1). If the patient showed abnormalities in every parameter, the score would be +4.

Results

Sixteen patients had a score of 0, 17 scored +1, 10 scored +2, 17 scored +3, and one scored +4. The median survival time (MST) of the 61 patients was 9 months. Patients were divided into two groups, a low-score group (0 and +1) and a high-score group (+2, +3, and +4). The MST of the 33 patients in the low-score group was significantly longer than that of the 28 patients in the high-score group (15 months versus 4 months, P < 0.001). Also, conversion chemotherapy was performed in 4.9% (3/61) of patients. And these 3 patients were in a low-score group.

Conclusions

This new prognostic scoring system may help to select patients with unresectable advanced colorectal cancer who are able to survive through intensive chemotherapy.

Keywords

ChemotherapyColorectal cancerInflammationImmunityNutrition

Background

Unresectable locally advanced colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis. Many patients suffer from obstructive ileus or sub-ileus, and bypass surgery or artificial anus reconstruction may be needed to improve their quality of life. 5-Fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan, with or without molecularly targeted drugs, has been administered as first-line and as the standard treatment for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer [1, 2]. Many patients fail to recover from such palliative surgery and effective chemotherapy is therefore not possible. However, some patients undergo complete resection of primary and metastatic cancer sites after intensive chemotherapy, and may subsequently survive for long periods. It is therefore important to identify those patients who are able to survive through intensive chemotherapy.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) has been recognized as a good indicator for the use of intensive chemotherapy in advanced carcinoma [3, 4]; however, this parameter lacks objectivity. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) has been shown to improve the accuracy of predicting cancer-specific survival in a variety of common solid tumors, including colorectal cancer [5, 6]. Regarding measurement of the systemic inflammatory response, the combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin (ALB) may be useful for diagnosing not only chronic inflammation but also nutritional status in cancer patients. Chua and colleagues [7] and Yamanaka and colleagues [8] concluded that the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the peripheral blood of patients was one aspect of the chronic systemic inflammatory response that influenced clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, while Ubukata and colleagues [9] reported that elevated NLR indicated an immunosuppressive state in cancer patients. NLR in peripheral blood may thus be considered as both a marker of inflammation and also an immunological marker. Preoperative assessment of a patient’s immunological and nutritional conditions (prognostic nutritional index, or PNI) has recently been reported as an important marker in cancer patients [10, 11]. Furthermore, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is known to be a good indicator for progression of colorectal cancer [12].

In the present study, we evaluated the objective prognostic markers GPS, NLR, PNI, and CEA in consecutive patients with unresectable advanced colorectal cancer and investigated whether these markers predicted response to chemotherapy and long-term survival.

Methods

Patients

A total of 615 primary colorectal cancer patients were introduced to our department for medical treatment between January 2004 and December 2013. Primary colorectal regions had been resected in 550 patients (89.4%), but colorectal resection had been abandoned in the remaining 65 patients (10.6%) because of advancement of primary or metastatic tumors, poor performance status (PS), or advanced age. Of these 65 patients, four with no advancement of tumors who refused further treatment were excluded from this study. Sixty-one patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer with invasion to neighboring important organs (such as the liver, pancreas, kidney, bladder, or sacral bone) with or without synchronous distant metastasis were diagnosed as initially unresectable. Local invasion of tumors were detected to cavitas pelvis including sacral bone in 19, to liver, duodenum, and pancreas in 11, to uterus or bladder in 18, and to kidney or ureter in 13 patients. Other clinicopathological characteristics of the 61 patients are shown in Table 1. Obstruction was the most commonly detected primary tumor-related symptom (obstruction, 30; bleeding or anemia, 5; obstruction and bleeding, 6; and local pain, 4). The 36 patients (59%) with obstruction caused by primary tumors underwent bypass surgery (n = 8), artificial anus reconstruction (n = 26), or both (n = 2). Metastases were found in 46 patients (75.4%), with liver metastasis the most frequently detected. No distant metastases were found in 15 patients.
Table 1

Clinicopathological characteristics of 61 patients

Age (years, mean ± SD (median and range))

67.8 ± 13.5 (68, 35-94)

Gender (male/female)

35/26

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (0/1/2/3)

33/13/12/3

Location (colon/rectum)

32/29

Primary tumor-related obstruction (yes/no)

36/25

Metastasis (n)

 

 Liver only

20

 Liver and lung

10

 Liver and peritoneum

5

 Extended lymph node only

4

 Peritoneum only

4

 Lung only

1

 Bone only

1

 Lung and bone

1

Treatment (n)

 

 Chemotherapy only

16

 Surgical intervention + chemotherapy

25

 Surgical intervention only

13

 Best supportive care

7

Chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy with or without surgical intervention were performed in 41 patients (67.2%; chemotherapy only, n = 32; and chemo-radiotherapy, n = 9), but no effective treatment other than surgery was possible in a further 13 patients. Seven patients with advanced age or poor PS received best supportive care. The 61 patients were followed until May 2014 and the median follow-up time was 8 months.

Blood samples

Blood samples were taken from each patient routinely at their first visit to our hospital. CRP, serum ALB, NLR, PNI, and CEA levels were analyzed for each patient.

Scoring system

Patients were scored according to the original GPS. The GPS consists of the combination of CRP and ALB measurements. Patients with normal CRP (≤1.0 mg/dL) and normal ALB (≥3.5 g/dL) had a GPS of 0 and were classified as the low GPS group. Patients with either one abnormal factor (GPS = 1), or both abnormal factors (GPS = 2) were classified as the high GPS group. According to a previous report [7], an NLR ≥5 was considered abnormal. The PNI was calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum ALB concentration (g/dL) + 0.005 × lymphocyte count (number/mm2) in peripheral blood. The PNI cut-off value was determined to be 40 [10]. According to Hsu and colleagues [12], CEA ≥10 ng/mL was considered abnormal. All investigations were conducted in conformity with the Recommendations from the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all these 61 patients about their treatment. The study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Tottori University (approval number: 1223).

Statistical analysis

Differences between two parameters were compared using χ2 tests for independence, Fisher’s exact probability test, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between two parameters. Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of differences between survival curves was examined by log-rank tests. A P value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

The median survival time (MST) of the 61 patients was 9 months (range 1 to 75 months). Chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy were performed in 41 patients; however, chemotherapy was ceased after surgical intervention in 13 patients because of poor PS or rapid tumor growth after surgery (Table 1). The MST in the 41 patients who underwent chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of the remaining 20 patients (10 months versus 3 months, P = 0.006). To select those patients likely to survive intensive treatment, we analyzed several prognostic factors. Table 2 shows the correlations between several prognostic factors and patient survival. According to our data, patient age, serum CEA level, and location of tumors (data not shown) were not correlated with patient survival.
Table 2

Prognostic parameters in patients with unresectable advanced colorectal carcinoma

  

n

MST (months)

P

Age (years)

≥75

22

9

0.303

<75

39

9

ECOG-PS

0 or 1

46

10

0.022

2 or 3

15

5

GPS

0 or 1

37

12

<0.001

2

24

4

NLR

≥5

29

4

0.002

<5

32

13

PNI

≥40

35

10

0.002

<40

26

4

CEA (ng/mL)

≥10

33

9

0.268

<10

28

9

CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score; MST, median survival time; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

The mean levels of CRP and ALB, lymphocyte count in peripheral blood, NLR, PNI, and CEA in the 61 patients were 3.2 (range 0.01 to 13.9) mg/dL, 3.4 (range 1.8 to 4.7) g/dL, 1,322 (range 123 to 2,899)/mm2, 5.7 (range 1.1 to 31), 40.6 (range 19.6 to 58) and 567 (range 1.2 to 20,157) ng/mL, respectively. Fifty-three patients died of progressive disease during the follow-up period and the remaining eight were alive at May 2014. Only one patient underwent complete resection of both distant metastatic sites (lung and liver) and the primary tumor after bypass surgery followed by intensive chemotherapy, and this patient remained alive at 75 months after the initial visit to our hospital, without recurrence or additional treatment. Primary tumor resection was performed in a further two patients, one of whom died at 35 months as a result of progression of liver metastasis, and the other remained alive at 13 months, with chemotherapy. Conversion chemotherapy was therefore performed in 4.9% (3/61) of patients with initially unresectable locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Table 3 indicates our scoring system. According to our scoring system, patients with abnormal PS, GPS, NLR, and PNI had a score of 4. Sixteen patients scored 0, 17 scored +1, 10 scored +2, 17 scored +3, and 1 scored +4. The 61 patients were divided into two groups based on our scoring system: a low-score group (0 and +1) and a high-score group (+2, +3, and +4). The MST of the 33 patients in the low-score group (15 months) was significantly higher than that of the 28 patients in the high-score group (4 months, P < 0.001; Figure 1). Three patients who underwent conversion chemotherapy were in the low-score group. Thus, these results indicate that this scoring system based on a combination of several prognostic factors may represent a useful method for selecting patients with initially unresectable advanced colorectal cancer who will survive.
Table 3

Scoring system

  

n

Score

ECOG-PS

0 or 1

46

0

2 or 3

15

+1

GPS

0 or 1

37

0

2

24

+1

NLR

≥ 5

29

+1

< 5

32

0

PNI

≥ 40

35

0

< 40

26

+1

ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

Figure 1

Survival curves of patients with a low- and high- score groups. The survival curve of 33 patients with low scores (score 0 and +1; solid line) was significantly higher than that for 28 patients with high scores (score +2, +3, and +4; dashed line; P < 0.001).

Discussion

R0 (complete resection of tumors) surgery is the only treatment associated with long-term survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this radical surgery may have to be omitted because of numerous distant metastases or local advancement of tumors. Effective chemotherapy should be administered and palliative surgery (bypass surgery or artificial anus reconstruction) performed in such patients. Even if the tumor is deemed unresectable at the time of administration (initially unresectable colorectal cancer), complete resection of both primary and metastatic tumors can be performed after palliative surgery and intensive chemotherapy in a few patients. Such conversion therapy has been associated with favorable long-term survival in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer [1315]. In the present study, we analyzed the factors used to estimate who can undergo conversion therapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable colorectal cancer who had palliative surgery or chemotherapy.

Although conversion chemotherapy has been discussed in relation to unresectable liver metastases, few studies have considered conversion chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer [16, 17]. Hsu and colleagues [12] reported that aggressive chemotherapy had a survival benefit, even in patients with unresectable locally advanced colorectal cancer. They concluded that high a CEA level was a prognostic factor for poorer survival in these patients. In this study, surgical resection of primary sites, or both primary and metastatic sites, could be performed after intensive chemotherapy in 5% of patients with initially unresectable and locally advanced colorectal cancer. However, prior to administering intensive chemotherapy and performing conversion chemotherapy, it is necessary to identify those patients likely to survive. The CEA level is widely used to monitor recurrence during postoperative follow-up, and high serum CEA levels are associated with advanced tumor stage, poor prognosis, and reduced survival in patients with colorectal cancer. CEA may therefore be a good indicator of tumor progression. However, in our study we found that high serum CEA levels did not reflect survival of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. Also, many reports suggest that CEA levels did not correlate with tumor progression in many colorectal tumors [10, 11]. Thus, we excluded the pretreatment serum CEA level from our scoring system.

CRP, serum ALB, and peripheral lymphocyte count in cancer patients have recently attracted research attention. These factors may act as indicators of inflammation, nutrition, and immunity. GPS is well known as an inflammatory and nutritional prognostic parameter in various cancers, and may be a useful marker for treatment administration in advanced cancers [18, 19]. Ikuta and colleagues [19] reported that poor GPS may be a negative indicator for palliative bypass surgery in unresectable pancreatic or biliary cancers. NLR may also indicate the patient’s inflammation and immunity status. Circulating lymphocytes are known to play an important immunological role in various carcinomas [20, 21]. Additionally, a strong correlation between cancer progression and lymphopenia was detected in patients with clear cell renal carcinoma [22]. Lissoni and colleagues reported that lymphocytosis occurred independently of tumor histotype and chemotherapeutic regimen in patients who achieved objective tumor regression in response to chemotherapy, and that the mean lymphocyte count was significantly increased after chemotherapy [23]. They added that the mean lymphocyte count decreased with chemotherapy in patients with tumor progression.

Furthermore, ECOG-PS and Onodera’s PNI are known nutritional markers. Although both these markers may be strong prognostic indicators, analyzing them separately may not be enough to select patients able to survive intensive treatment. We therefore advocated a new scoring system using ECOG-PS, GPS, NLR, and PNI. The MST in patients with low scores (score 0 or +1) was 15 months, which was significantly longer than that of patients with high scores (+2, +3, or +4; 4 months). Although the sample size in this study was small, the scoring system was able to predict the prognosis of patients with unresectable advanced colorectal cancer during treatment. In order to prove this fact, future large-scale study is needed.

Conclusion

Patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer with distant metastasis who have low scores may be able to survive through intensive treatment, even if they were deemed to be unresectable at the time of pretreatment. The number of patients of our study was small, but the results from our primitive study may lead us to large-scale study in the future.

Abbreviations

ALB: 

albumin

CEA: 

carcinoembryonic antigen

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

ECOG-PS: 

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status

GPS: 

Glasgow Prognostic Score

MST: 

median survival time

NLR: 

neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio

PNI: 

prognostic nutritional index

PS: 

performance status.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University

References

  1. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, Boni C, Cortes-Funes H, Cervantes A, Freyer G, Papamichael D, Le Bail N, Louvet C, Hendler D, de Braud F, Wilson C, Morvan F, Bonetti A: Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 2938-2947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocákova I, Ruff P, Błasińska-Morawiec M, Šmakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J: Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 4697-4705. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hwang JE, Kim HN, Kim DE, Choi HJ, Jung SH, Shim HJ, Bae WK, Hwang EC, Cho SH, Chung IJ: Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurred or metastatic gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 489-10.1186/1471-2407-11-489.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Urba S, Gatz J, Shen W, Hossain A, Winfree K, Koustenis A, Peterson P, Cohen EE: Quality of life scores as prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced head and neck cancer: analysis of a phase III randomized trial of pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy. Oral Oncol. 2012, 48: 723-729. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.02.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McMillan DC: The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013, 39: 534-540. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kishiki T, Masaki T, Matsuoka H, Kobayashi T, Suzuki Y, Abe N, Mori T, Sugiyama M: Modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2013, 206: 234-240. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chua W, Charles KA, Baracos VE, Clarke SJ: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011, 104: 1288-1295. 10.1038/bjc.2011.100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M: The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2007, 73: 215-220. 10.1159/000127412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ubukata H, Motohashi G, Tabuchi T, Nagata H, Konishi S, Tabuchi T: Evaluation of interferon-γ/interleukin-4 ratio and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicators in gastric cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 102: 742-747. 10.1002/jso.21725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nozoe T, Kohno M, Iguchi T, Mori E, Maeda T, Matsukuma A, Ezaki T: The prognostic nutritional index can be a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2012, 42: 532-535. 10.1007/s00595-011-0061-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Maeda K, Shibutani M, Otani H, Nagahara H, Sugano K, Ikeya T, Kubo N, Amano R, Kimura K, Muguruma K, Tanaka H, Hirakawa K: Low nutritional prognostic index correlates with poor survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer following palliative resection of the primary tumor. World J Surg. 2014, 38: 1217-1222. 10.1007/s00268-013-2386-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsu CW, King TM, Wang HT, Wang JH: Factors that influence survival in unresectable metastatic or locally advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011, 26: 1559-1566. 10.1007/s00384-011-1231-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Uehara K, Ishiguro S, Hiramatsu K, Nishio H, Takeuchi E, Takahari D, Yoshioka Y, Takahashi Y, Ebata T, Yoshimura K, Muro K, Nagino M: Conversion chemotherapy using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI followed by bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011, 41: 1229-1232. 10.1093/jjco/hyr115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Beppu T, Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Imai K, Nitta H, Hayashi H, Chikamoto A, Watanabe M, Ishiko T, Baba H: Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases, focusing on conversion hepatectomy and long-term survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014, 21: supplement pp405-413-doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3577-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein W, Raab HR, Weitz J, Lordick F, Hartmann JT, Stoehlmacher-Williams J, Lang H, Trarbach T, Liersch T, Ockert D, Jaeger D, Steger U, Suedhoff T, Rentsch A, Köhne CH: Survival of patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a multidisciplinary concept (CELIM study). Ann Oncol. 2014, 25: 1018-1025. 10.1093/annonc/mdu088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Masi G, Cupini S, Marcucci L, Cerri E, Loupakis F, Allegrini G, Brunetti IM, Pfanner E, Viti M, Goletti O, Filipponi F, Falcone A: Treatment with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan enables surgical resection of metastases in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006, 13: 58-65. 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tomoda M, Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Enomoto H, Akiba T, Yanaga K: Usefulness of monthly chemotherapy for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014, 34: 191-194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. La Torre M, Nigri G, Cavallini M, Mercantini P, Ziparo V, Ramacciato G: The Glasgow Prognostic Score as a predictor of survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012, 19: 2917-2923. 10.1245/s10434-012-2348-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ikuta Y, Takamori H, Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto D, Chikamoto A, Kuroki H, Sakata K, Sakamoto K, Hayashi H, Imai K, Nitta H, Hirota M, Kanemitsu K, Beppu T, Baba H: The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is a good predictor of indication for palliative bypass surgery in patients with unresectable pancreatic and biliary cancers. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013, doi:10.1007/s10147-013-0613-yGoogle Scholar
  20. Milasiene V, Stratilatovas E, Norkiene V, Jonusauskaite R: Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood as prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. J BUON. 2005, 10: 261-264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fogar P, Sperti C, Basso D, Sanzari MC, Greco E, Davoli C, Navaglia F, Zambon CF, Pasquali C, Venza E, Pedrazzoli S, Plebani M: Decreased total lymphocyte counts in pancreatic cancer: an index of adverse outcome. Pancreas. 2006, 32: 22-28. 10.1097/01.mpa.0000188305.90290.50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saroha S, Uzzo RG, Plimack ER, Ruth K, Al-Saleem T: Lymphopenia is an independent predictor of inferior outcome in clear cell renal carcinoma. J Urol. 2013, 189: 454-461. 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.166.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lissoni P, Fumagalli L, Brivio F, Rovelli F, Messina G, Di Fede G, Colciago M, Brera G: Cancer chemotherapy-induced lymphocytosis: a revolutionary discovery in the medical oncology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2006, 20: 29-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ikeguchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement